haha you are missing a link but i love it
pleasereason 1 year ago
Actually, your argument would go as follows:
CLAIM: I deserve a 100 on the final exam.
DATA: I've done well all semester (including sitting on the front row).
WARRANT: Doing well all semester merits a 100 on the final exam.
The warrant is the basic assumption that allows you to support the claim by the data given. Of course, you can see that the assumption is fallacious.
REBUTTAL: Doing well all semester doesn't have anything to do with how well someone performs on a final exam.
socrhet26 1 year ago
So, what grade did you get?
PattyCake3747 1 year ago
haha you are missing a link but i love it
pleasereason 1 year ago
Actually, your argument would go as follows:
CLAIM: I deserve a 100 on the final exam.
DATA: I've done well all semester (including sitting on the front row).
WARRANT: Doing well all semester merits a 100 on the final exam.
The warrant is the basic assumption that allows you to support the claim by the data given. Of course, you can see that the assumption is fallacious.
REBUTTAL: Doing well all semester doesn't have anything to do with how well someone performs on a final exam.
socrhet26 1 year ago
So, what grade did you get?
PattyCake3747 1 year ago