u guys are wankers. cars dont explode unless there is a bomb in this case it was releasing fuel which ignited causing flames not explosions, if u wanks knew how to drive there wouldnt be any deaths, and if u were that worried about being rear ended then y u dont wear seatbelts and othe safety devices that were around in the 70s I still think it was a shit desighn but hey if you crash into a wall doing 100 y would you think it was the cars fault you died
@DanDaMan4A69 Because it wasn't the Pinto drivers' faults that their gas tanks would explode, covering the car's interior in burning fuel. It was a faulty, unsafe design that caused so many deaths. Additionally, the gas tanks only exploded, and not in the typical movie-type sense, when the car was hit from behind with some force, which meant someone else's bad driving caused the problem.
@happyfeet19942008 Is that the story? I always heard that they commenced a risk analysis for the cost of reducing fatality's from gas tank punctures and concurred that it was cheaper to pay up to the lawsuits than put a 15 dollar piece of plastic as a buffer zone because it would eventually cost them more than to pay off people.
@thinkpad411 Rgardless of the fiiiiix, public image had been shttered so they could have made the Pinto a perfect car and no one would have bought it so they took the tech of a Pinto and placed in it other cars people drove.
another dummy that don't even know what a pinto is and the real story behind that why don't you reasearch something before you go make and ass out of yourself moron!!
To make it even worse they came with Firestone 500 tires which would develop huge goose eggs on the sidewalls before they blew...only car that ran worse after a dealer tuneup because early pollution requirements were difficult to meet before computers and cats..
@bellcord Bullshit, If the car ran worse after a "dealer tune up" it wasnt tuned right to begin with. The only tuning to be done would have been changing the plugs and wires. I was able to tune my '78 2.3 in around twenty minutes. Our shop sold Firestone tires for years and had no such problems. Early pollution requirements were never a problem providing the car was in proper tune. Look for a "huge goose egg ready to blow" between your legs.
@dicarlo57 Don't hand me that horseshit junior ...I WAS THERE...The Firestone 500 tires were a HUGE scandal because they developed bulges on the sidewalls..just like mine did...read it in the paper ..went out to check and sure as hell a big goose egg in 2 of the 4...and I mean as big as your fist....Also , Pinto's still had a carbuerator which tuned by the dealer to pollution specs made it run worse ...it was in spec for minimum hydrocarbons but idled and ran so lean it drove awful..
They later found that there were protuding bolts that were in the rear close to the gas tank. If you had a rear end collision these bolts would go into and puncture the tank.
We had three people that were killed here in Austin Texas due to this bad design.
You all are a bunch of ass holes. I LOVE to get blown up in cars. It has happened to me 4 times. It's really a rush. Better than getting my nipples pierced. These cars ROCK!!!! I've had 2 wagons, and they are the BOMB!! :)
@19rsm61 I a cop that got badly burned when his Crown Vic got rear ended. I guess the guys at Ford are slow learners. Are you refering to the 60's Chevy pickups with the gas tanks right behind the seat?
hey in my old days we ride in the back of these thing no seat belts ! ate fish with mercury ! cooked diner in the oven ! stood in line for a pay phone ,! wore plad pants ,white shoes! play outside untill it was dark ! had board games ! no cell phone or high tect stuff ! and lived ?? !
pintos were bad, but '73-'89 chevy trucks were worse, killing over 1800 people. Chevy refused to aknowledge the problem for nearly 20 years. The problem was that the gas tanks-some had two-were on the sides of the vehicle, outside the frame.
@explodingchevy where did you get these numbers? I still see hundreds of these around even though they havent been built since 1987. (GMT400 generation truck came out late 1987 as a 1988 model year fyi)
" I would further suggest that the comments below are from people who never saw a Pinto and seek to denigrate automobiles from American manufacturers. Sorry we can't HEAR you.
How's your Toyota with the sticking gas pedel that won't stop - gotta love it - to death.
'...Pinto explosion fatality estimates range widely from 27 to 900,[98] with the lowest figures being allegedly in line with comparable fatality statistics for other car models....Of the two plaintiffs, one was killed in the collision that caused her Pinto to explode, and her passenger, 13-year old Richard Grimshaw, was badly burned and scarred for life."
The wikipedia information quoted above suggests that the exploding Pinto seems to be an exaggeration....."
@91dodgespiritrt Yes but it makes sense that if the rear is hit hard enough, gas can leak all over the road, and then ignite from something superfluous like sparks from a dangling bumper.
@91dodgespiritrt The issue was the filler pipe separated from the fuel tank upon a hard collision, instead of from the body of the car resulting, the fuel draining out and igniting.
You have to recall the time, the gas crisis was ongoing in 1973 and many were puting locking gas caps on their cars which aggravated the situation.
Never figured out how the hard plastic shield between the rear axle and tank helped anything.
Btw, a mallory unilite, MSD and heavy duty front springs were the ticket.
@happyfeet19942008 Nonsense. It was Lee Iacoccas' idea to market the early pintos weighing 1900 lbs. In the case of an extreme rear end collision the gas tank would ram into the rear axle, rupture and in many cases ignite. The revised design -I believe 1973 and later- weighed 2700 lbs. The additional weight being in reinforced rear frame sections and inner quarter panels, and a simple plastic sheild covering the diffrential cover. I owned a 78 pinto with a 2.3 which was a fine car
@happyfeet19942008 They did not explode. In a severe rear end collision (such as a notable example where the car was stopped and hit at 50mph), the gas tank could get punctured and then the leaking gas could cause the car to burst into flames. It wasn't any more dangerous than any other small car at the time. There was also a plate put on new cars staring in the mid 70s and also on existing ones in a recall that would prevent the gas tank from getting punctured.
@volvicnaturelle1 Because of the bumper design (there really are no bumpers) if a Pinto was rear ended, the gas tank would rupture and usually burst into flames.
My 1st car was an old 1973 Pinto. I was 16years old. I gladly shelled out 500bucks. The engine set on fire within 2 weeks. Had drove less then 200 miles. True story!
My father had a 1973 explosive pinto and he got rear ended at a stop light by a big Plymouth Fury. He only got a small dent in the chrome trim around the tail light but the (rusty) Plymouth's front end was destroyed. My father says he was shocked he didn't blow up when he got hit then was even more shocked and amused by the level of damage to both cars.
@mrvladtepes Yeah and fORD doesnt have this problem too? type in youtube "RUNAWAY CARS"
They sold ford SUV with cruise control problems for years in America and had problems. Then knowing the problem, they still sold these things in the UK. Also ford SUVs and trucks catch on fire, type in "ford cruise control fire"
At least Toyota accepted responsibility, halted production to investigate the problem, and even publicly apologized to the American public. ford's policy is to "delay and cover-up".
lots of old muscle cars with the gas cap in the rear would blow up to if hit hard enough. if it should blow up the impact would have probably killed you anyways. i see it as, atleast the explosion might take the asshole who hit you with you :P
they put ttwo extra smaller tanks inbetween the box and fenders so they could say "we get more miles per tank", yet not to many people know about this. pinto blowing up was not a serious problem anyways. very rare occurance.
I have a pinto its a great car and only the 71 model caught fire. They made them for 10 years you know and only one ever burnt. Good car cute commercial. I wish I could go back and but a brand new one.
nice spelling
TheLethalPriest 1 month ago
u guys are wankers. cars dont explode unless there is a bomb in this case it was releasing fuel which ignited causing flames not explosions, if u wanks knew how to drive there wouldnt be any deaths, and if u were that worried about being rear ended then y u dont wear seatbelts and othe safety devices that were around in the 70s I still think it was a shit desighn but hey if you crash into a wall doing 100 y would you think it was the cars fault you died
dumbass
DanDaMan4A69 2 months ago
@DanDaMan4A69 Because it wasn't the Pinto drivers' faults that their gas tanks would explode, covering the car's interior in burning fuel. It was a faulty, unsafe design that caused so many deaths. Additionally, the gas tanks only exploded, and not in the typical movie-type sense, when the car was hit from behind with some force, which meant someone else's bad driving caused the problem.
Clarancecat 2 months ago
@DanDaMan4A69 Most of the fires occurred on highways and surface streets, not when someone ran their Pinto into a wall.
Clarancecat 2 months ago
They're great when re-worked for the quarter mile...Horrible on the street...
Crazcompart 4 months ago
@happyfeet19942008 Is that the story? I always heard that they commenced a risk analysis for the cost of reducing fatality's from gas tank punctures and concurred that it was cheaper to pay up to the lawsuits than put a 15 dollar piece of plastic as a buffer zone because it would eventually cost them more than to pay off people.
thinkpad411 4 months ago 3
@thinkpad411 that's right, sick and disturbing
arseniyonline1234555 4 months ago
@thinkpad411 Rgardless of the fiiiiix, public image had been shttered so they could have made the Pinto a perfect car and no one would have bought it so they took the tech of a Pinto and placed in it other cars people drove.
sphinxrising58 3 months ago
It is the HOTTEST car ever built!
CptNeutralize 5 months ago
it's still safer than driving a modern toyota.
craze1701 5 months ago 2
i have a ford pinto ive got it from american graffiti
redracing20 5 months ago
im surprised when the hose touched the back of the pinto it didnt explode... oh duhh there was no gas
fatqwert200 5 months ago
LOL that's so true!!! thank you for posting this video!!!!
TheMostAwesomeMan242 5 months ago
saw two people killed in this unsafe car, both burned to death , shame on you Ford!!!
Rickdamm 5 months ago
When the horse licked the back of the Pinto i closed my eyes thinking it would blow.
fredmonk9947 6 months ago
25 MPG! Outrageous! Who ever heard of such amazing fuel economy?
GmanNetworks 6 months ago
Still want a pinto..
shoottothrill556 6 months ago
pinto coolest little car,FORD should consider bringing it back retro style like the mustang and t bird it would probably do well in sales.
stangfever04 6 months ago
another dummy that don't even know what a pinto is and the real story behind that why don't you reasearch something before you go make and ass out of yourself moron!!
irobot2009able 7 months ago
Mine was a brand-new '73..
bellcord 8 months ago
being seen in one of these is as embarrasing as being seen in an AMC
msmithstud 8 months ago
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk quem quer pinto aí gennnte????ha!ha!ha! esses americanos, nao sei não....gayzaços! big gays!!!! lolo kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk!
solon366 9 months ago
The little horse seemed to smell something bad at the rear end and dashed away.
Helmut83 9 months ago
carefree car... but not in reverse
fairyheli2 10 months ago
To make it even worse they came with Firestone 500 tires which would develop huge goose eggs on the sidewalls before they blew...only car that ran worse after a dealer tuneup because early pollution requirements were difficult to meet before computers and cats..
bellcord 10 months ago
@bellcord Bullshit, If the car ran worse after a "dealer tune up" it wasnt tuned right to begin with. The only tuning to be done would have been changing the plugs and wires. I was able to tune my '78 2.3 in around twenty minutes. Our shop sold Firestone tires for years and had no such problems. Early pollution requirements were never a problem providing the car was in proper tune. Look for a "huge goose egg ready to blow" between your legs.
dicarlo57 8 months ago
@dicarlo57 Don't hand me that horseshit junior ...I WAS THERE...The Firestone 500 tires were a HUGE scandal because they developed bulges on the sidewalls..just like mine did...read it in the paper ..went out to check and sure as hell a big goose egg in 2 of the 4...and I mean as big as your fist....Also , Pinto's still had a carbuerator which tuned by the dealer to pollution specs made it run worse ...it was in spec for minimum hydrocarbons but idled and ran so lean it drove awful..
bellcord 8 months ago
@bellcord What year pinto are you refering to? My '78 had a 2.3 which was easy to tune and allways ran well.
dicarlo57 8 months ago
Pintos aren't bad with cheese! Oh....you mean the car!
visor109 10 months ago
26 ppl are burn victims who are bitter
mrsnizz20XL 11 months ago
They later found that there were protuding bolts that were in the rear close to the gas tank. If you had a rear end collision these bolts would go into and puncture the tank.
We had three people that were killed here in Austin Texas due to this bad design.
tejanochris 11 months ago
I like how they called it a carefree car.. not carefree when something rams into the back of it
koshi116 11 months ago
That is a quick way to die , when you drive a toyota your suffering will be endless and you didnt know how you die!
arielrodrigo1 11 months ago
lol funny as hell
CoyoteInterceptor 1 year ago
what are you talking about? as long as you dont touch the rear end of it it wont blow up! theyre great cars! lmao
Joester1908 1 year ago
the commercial is just soo cheesy
HassanOntario 1 year ago
You all are a bunch of ass holes. I LOVE to get blown up in cars. It has happened to me 4 times. It's really a rush. Better than getting my nipples pierced. These cars ROCK!!!! I've had 2 wagons, and they are the BOMB!! :)
Thunderchicken1997 1 year ago 2
no I don't want a Pinto, it has fail written all over it.
ZerolockXXX 1 year ago
laugh about the Pinto but remember...a lot of people have died in Crown Vics and Chevy pickups cause of poor gastank placement.
19rsm61 1 year ago
@19rsm61 I a cop that got badly burned when his Crown Vic got rear ended. I guess the guys at Ford are slow learners. Are you refering to the 60's Chevy pickups with the gas tanks right behind the seat?
aqinthe 11 months ago
hey in my old days we ride in the back of these thing no seat belts ! ate fish with mercury ! cooked diner in the oven ! stood in line for a pay phone ,! wore plad pants ,white shoes! play outside untill it was dark ! had board games ! no cell phone or high tect stuff ! and lived ?? !
cowboy0140 1 year ago
Pinto. Foals find it sexually alluring.
boiledelephant 1 year ago
what a LAME video...
chakuman 1 year ago
Thats why they recalled those vehicles and fixed them
jefflablanc 1 year ago
LOL 0:28 what if the horse headbutted the car and BOOM!!!
antieye555 1 year ago
FUCK YALL PINTO HATERS!
kartracer105 1 year ago
@kartracer105 .....right on kartracer105
19rsm61 1 year ago
The carefree car *BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM*
FireJigglypuff2310 1 year ago
buy cheap.........get cheap.......and dead.
wdh47211 1 year ago
It's been proven many times that they weren't any more dangerous than other cars it's size in it's time.
Compared to today yes it's a death machine, but back then had an average number of deaths for a car 75ish.
Briancmwilliams 1 year ago
ha my dad had a couple of these..... you needed a couple of them to keep one going!!!!! hahahaha
bighead29058 1 year ago
hell i like pintos
wheeler8801 1 year ago
I rear-ended a pinto once, it exploded in my face and then galloped away.
Libervurto 1 year ago
the car built especially for micheal bay
nickrulez809765 1 year ago
pintos were bad, but '73-'89 chevy trucks were worse, killing over 1800 people. Chevy refused to aknowledge the problem for nearly 20 years. The problem was that the gas tanks-some had two-were on the sides of the vehicle, outside the frame.
Side impact = explosion
explodingchevy 1 year ago
@explodingchevy fuck u
franknigai 1 year ago
@explodingchevy where did you get these numbers? I still see hundreds of these around even though they havent been built since 1987. (GMT400 generation truck came out late 1987 as a 1988 model year fyi)
mustang633NY 1 year ago
People, ANY car will blow up if you hit them hard enough. The Crown Vic was a bigger car and it blew up alot.
azgypsy 1 year ago
I had a '77 for 20 years...never blew up
LTF6161 1 year ago
I had one. It was a great little car! I only sold it to get a bigger car when I had kids.
LonLofgren 1 year ago
I have an idea: Don't touch the rear.
boogioogigoof 1 year ago
" I would further suggest that the comments below are from people who never saw a Pinto and seek to denigrate automobiles from American manufacturers. Sorry we can't HEAR you.
How's your Toyota with the sticking gas pedel that won't stop - gotta love it - to death.
91dodgespiritrt 1 year ago 2
'...Pinto explosion fatality estimates range widely from 27 to 900,[98] with the lowest figures being allegedly in line with comparable fatality statistics for other car models....Of the two plaintiffs, one was killed in the collision that caused her Pinto to explode, and her passenger, 13-year old Richard Grimshaw, was badly burned and scarred for life."
The wikipedia information quoted above suggests that the exploding Pinto seems to be an exaggeration....."
91dodgespiritrt 1 year ago 6
@91dodgespiritrt Yes but it makes sense that if the rear is hit hard enough, gas can leak all over the road, and then ignite from something superfluous like sparks from a dangling bumper.
thinkpad411 4 months ago
@91dodgespiritrt The issue was the filler pipe separated from the fuel tank upon a hard collision, instead of from the body of the car resulting, the fuel draining out and igniting.
You have to recall the time, the gas crisis was ongoing in 1973 and many were puting locking gas caps on their cars which aggravated the situation.
Never figured out how the hard plastic shield between the rear axle and tank helped anything.
Btw, a mallory unilite, MSD and heavy duty front springs were the ticket.
rampking1 3 months ago
"The New little Carefree Car from Ford"
I don't think Carefree really describes the Ford Pinto.
jubinizzle 1 year ago
@jubinizzle It does, really, because if it cared about anything it wouldn't explode. :)
gp75motorsports 1 year ago
Care free car alright!
TheXenomorph1980 1 year ago
This was back in the day when "import" meant crap. Now "American" is the new crap.
xar51 1 year ago
getting rear ended causes the thing to basically explode
happyfeet19942008 1 year ago
no it wont my dad had a 70 pinto and he got ran into the rear and nothing happened ecept the car had to be put in the junk yard
94504civic 1 year ago
@happyfeet19942008 That was actually a defense mechanism
aqinthe 11 months ago
@happyfeet19942008 Nonsense. It was Lee Iacoccas' idea to market the early pintos weighing 1900 lbs. In the case of an extreme rear end collision the gas tank would ram into the rear axle, rupture and in many cases ignite. The revised design -I believe 1973 and later- weighed 2700 lbs. The additional weight being in reinforced rear frame sections and inner quarter panels, and a simple plastic sheild covering the diffrential cover. I owned a 78 pinto with a 2.3 which was a fine car
dicarlo57 8 months ago
@happyfeet19942008 They did not explode. In a severe rear end collision (such as a notable example where the car was stopped and hit at 50mph), the gas tank could get punctured and then the leaking gas could cause the car to burst into flames. It wasn't any more dangerous than any other small car at the time. There was also a plate put on new cars staring in the mid 70s and also on existing ones in a recall that would prevent the gas tank from getting punctured.
johnw429 6 months ago 2
@happyfeet19942008 they fixed that problem by securing the tank in rubber!
youpooper18 5 months ago
@youpooper18 it didn't work.
camouflagecamaro99 5 months ago
@happyfeet19942008 i owned one and well yets say my wifes in a wheel chair
iamcooldk 3 months ago
why is that car so bad?
volvicnaturelle1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@volvicnaturelle1 Because of the bumper design (there really are no bumpers) if a Pinto was rear ended, the gas tank would rupture and usually burst into flames.
atomikrobot300099 1 year ago
@volvicnaturelle1 its bad because when you get hit in the back, you explode.
MrMynameisalex 1 year ago
pinto-disco inferno
jomicvicious 1 year ago
is the pony supposed to mean it is a mini mustang cuz that would be a discrace
AreUBlem 1 year ago
is there a link to the exploison video at the end?
TheAbelinc2 1 year ago
i use a pinto as a racecar.... i changed the fuel tank (:
350z350zify 1 year ago
Yeah, I'd still get one. I'm looking for a '71 or '72. after they were recalled, the gas tank problem was fixed.
longhairedpig 1 year ago
My 1st car was an old 1973 Pinto. I was 16years old. I gladly shelled out 500bucks. The engine set on fire within 2 weeks. Had drove less then 200 miles. True story!
NewChannels 1 year ago 13
Wow it can keep up with a pony!
DVeck89 1 year ago
That explosion at the end was NOT a Pinto blowing up......nice try!!!
CJurasin 1 year ago
i wonder, what would happen if i park a ford pinto by times square????
LOL
joker0187 1 year ago
"you wont be pushed around by the wind" or anything by any chance
no one will want you or themselves dead alright
joker0187 1 year ago
Happy Feet was a suck ass movie.
irocz0r 1 year ago
It's not frisky, it's "risky"!
galoon 1 year ago
not only unsafe, but ugly too.
rtsoccerplayer 1 year ago 2
@rtsoccerplayer lolzz truee
bkzzxlilxthug 1 year ago
My father had a 1973 explosive pinto and he got rear ended at a stop light by a big Plymouth Fury. He only got a small dent in the chrome trim around the tail light but the (rusty) Plymouth's front end was destroyed. My father says he was shocked he didn't blow up when he got hit then was even more shocked and amused by the level of damage to both cars.
tallboyyyy 1 year ago
does the car suddenly accelerate out of control? no that's toyota.
mrvladtepes 1 year ago
and lexus
ClassicSteinwayJonas 1 year ago
@mrvladtepes Yeah and fORD doesnt have this problem too? type in youtube "RUNAWAY CARS"
They sold ford SUV with cruise control problems for years in America and had problems. Then knowing the problem, they still sold these things in the UK. Also ford SUVs and trucks catch on fire, type in "ford cruise control fire"
At least Toyota accepted responsibility, halted production to investigate the problem, and even publicly apologized to the American public. ford's policy is to "delay and cover-up".
minja714 1 year ago
Sad thing is that the Pinto was built better than all of the crap built today....
JesusChrysler300 1 year ago
lol... NOOOO!!! That little critter is too comfy near that cars rear end I must say...
gat666 1 year ago
priced like a standard car bomb
Ziplock74 1 year ago
lots of old muscle cars with the gas cap in the rear would blow up to if hit hard enough. if it should blow up the impact would have probably killed you anyways. i see it as, atleast the explosion might take the asshole who hit you with you :P
anthonyledo 2 years ago
8 - two plastic protection shield on the 2 round headlights,,,
9 - two leaf springs changed to top on the axle than under the axle,,,
10 - two gas charger lift spring supports on the front hood for open 90 degrees hold it the hood,,,
11 - two drive lights kits with 55 watts on the front bumper and two on the rear bumper,,,
12 - aluminum cooler fan on the motor for cooler radiator,,,
13 - eight small lights inside the car for better to see at night,,
bestamerica 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i miss my 1975 mercury bobcat car so much,,,
i did put full load on my bobcat car before,,,
.
1 - two full powered windows,,,
2 - two full lock / unlock powered doors,,,
3 - two full powered mirrors,,,
4 - one powered motor wiper blade on the rear window with a water from the honda car part,,,
5 - electric delay timer wiper blade,,,
6 - two taillights with 3 colors ( amber / red / white ) on the rear taillights from the capri car part,,,
7 - auto speed cruise control,,,
bestamerica 2 years ago
Had 3 of them in over 30 years of driving...never had a problem with ANY of them...good little cars, and cheap to own operate.
455Transam 2 years ago 3
You also know that a Chevy trucks had problems blowing when they were hit an the side.
EdwardPack1988 2 years ago 11
they put ttwo extra smaller tanks inbetween the box and fenders so they could say "we get more miles per tank", yet not to many people know about this. pinto blowing up was not a serious problem anyways. very rare occurance.
anthonyledo 2 years ago
@anthonyledo I know,my friends pinto got rear ended by a Buick Lasebre. Pinto has a bent bumber, Buick was totaled.
EdwardPack1988 2 years ago
No, these cars are BEAST.........when you drop a 302,351, or even a big block 429/460 in it :)
AJahtp 2 years ago 4
but its risky more like
FILIPINOCD 2 years ago
nice
HBMAN665420 2 years ago
happyfeet19942008 fucking puto
NAHUATL1977 2 years ago
shit...now i want TWO
JuicedJetta 2 years ago
LOL probly a chevy lover who edited this!
I have a pinto its a great car and only the 71 model caught fire. They made them for 10 years you know and only one ever burnt. Good car cute commercial. I wish I could go back and but a brand new one.
BigDestructor 2 years ago
lolololol!!!!!
mgospeed31 2 years ago
ur a stupid faggot asshole
gerfiglmac 2 years ago
:25 Kinda surprised it didn't blow up when the pony bumped into it.
Ghostpilot 2 years ago 74
I was hoping the pony was going to explode, lol. Woulda been funny
Dragon45348 2 years ago 39
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA that was the funniest comment ever 5star.
marvinracer88 2 years ago
@Ghostpilot that is what i was waiting for....
LOKOGONO 1 year ago
Best car i ever worked on
jesshooker 2 years ago
Ehh, you spelt Really wrong!
RedFlashProductions 2 years ago