Those supposed "x wings" look more like Z-95 Headhunters, which can easily be fitted with remote operation controls to be used as training drones. Do they think we are stupid?
@azjeff1971 9/11 "truthers" wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass.
All of their claims have been scientifically debunked. Many times. Full explanations for each phenominum has been shown to not be what they claim. It is known as blind bias and ignorance that fuels their claims.
@JPorter36 Defend your house self idk I didnt really think about what to say in a smart answer I wasnt trying or needing to show off... Wow you wanna be friends I will discuss numerous subjects with you its just hard being a single dad and dealing with trolls all the time over the raps I make. Wow theres a new can of worms so just have fun
@JPorter36 So how much time did you spend typing that... Wow your book smart can you hunt defend? I was just replying no Running for group support ass. I really dont know whats the deal with you but you a joke your not as smart as you think you are or you wouldnt even had replied... GEEK and bin laden and al qaeda are what I was talking ABOUT! do you have any proof that they actually took down the towers?
@JPorter36 your a fucking idiot listen to what the man is saying if the Government isnt to blame then prove them wrong by releasing all the information that was collected and NOW THEY HAVE FOUND BLASTING RESIDUE so now Can you back up your claim that Ghaad had anything to do with this any video tapes blue prints witness's?
Ya know, you really had me, until you said that the X-wings weren't really X-wings. They have their wings down for speed, and then extend them for attack maneuvers. Come on man!
you're wrong... Stephen Speilberg orchestrated the whole thing, the official story AND alternative story are both fabrications by those "in the know" and that it's all just for show. The real motives behind Speilberg's display cannot be known!
An exhaust port in SPACE? There is no air in space, you don't put an open conduct so that air comes in and make it lead to the main reactor. And come on, what about the fake names.... Porkins?! Is that all they could come up with?
Clearly not a cover up! Not only that the whole last section failed. The craft was an X-Wing. Its S-foils were closed and not locked into attack position. Next you be saying those Y-Wings behind them are cardboard cut outs!!
You guys need to get over the fact the Empire has fallen and the Emperor is no more!
Why isn't anyone talking about Jar Jar? We know Palpatine had him transferred, but no one knows where he went, and other than one alleged sighting, no one has seen him since the Senate was disbanded!!1!
Did he really "just go home to his family" as SOME people would have us believe?
Or was murdered on Alderaan as so many TRUE websites claim? Was ALL of Alderaan destroyed just to prevent him from telling us what REALLY happened on 5/25?
Come on, was this done to ridicule 9/11 truthers? I think we have to analyse the hypocrisy:
1) Luke Skywalker used The Force - and we don't want to believe OBL and the 19 li'l hijackers used magic carpets, do we?
2) It's interesting that the hijackers are compared to the SW rebels and the Empire equals the US adm. Um - do debunkers approve of supporting the baddies?
3) Comparing reality to a movie??
This is a great example of Debunkers Cognitive Dissonance - or maybe dual perception.
@Thetan1974 you're dumb. this is a joke. say it with me. a joke. there is nothing to suggest this is a parallel event to 9/11. osama bin laden did not use the force, george bush is not palpatine. no one is comparing the movie to reality, only you. rather, the comparison is a fictional movie (star wars) to another fictional movie (loose change).
If Osama didn't use his magic wand, how did he create the phenomenons during the collapses of THREE WTC skyscrapers as put up by AE911Truth. org?
Why haven't NIST explained them - and not at all building 7? What sense does it make to state that "Releasing building 7 data could jeopardize public safety"?
And how did he make NORAD stand down?
The official story about 9/11 os clearly the fairy tale despite some errors in Loose Change and other 9/11 Truth documentaries.
@Thetan1974 i could tell you. but see, it doesn't matter. because you don't want to hear the truth. NORAD did not issue a stand down. that's a lie. watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q
of course it doesnt matter to you that it's false. this is why i won't spend more time addressing your claims. it would be a complete and utter waste of time.
It's you who can't accept the truth; NORAD did of course not "issue" a stand down, but they were "out of order"! THEY should have responded directly to the off course jets. NOT the FAA.
@Thetan1974 no one pulled their plug. they were not out of order.
you're ignorant of the role of NORAD if you think it was their job - not the FAA's. i mean seriously even the dumbass site you gave me should give you hint.
"One ongoing mission of the Battle Management Center is to coordinate "air sovereignty" efforts, MONITORING EVERY AIRCRAFT THAT ENTERS [emphasis mine] U.S. or Canadian airspace"
that's ENTERING US AIRSPACE! that means from outside the country ENTERING the country.
@Thetan1974 What the fuck?? I did. I quoted your dumbass site and explained why their conclusion makes no sense. I can read it a million times and it's still wrong. Seriously, how dumb are you? When someone tells you why you're wrong, do you just repeat the very same thing endlessly? Here's a clue. Repeating the same shit over and over doesn't make it true.
As is stated on that site, NORAD would monitored a plane ENTERING the US airspace from outside... not a commercial flight within the US.
You can also go over the NIST Report and it will only make sense to those who are hell bent on believing that there's no inside job.
It's not really my problem that you don't understand the article. As it is clearly explained, NORAD would monitor and get info on every plane that go off radar, also domestic. Has nothing to do with keeping an eye on planes entering US airspace.
@Thetan1974 if it has "nothing to do with keeping an eye on planes entering US airspace" why does the article clearly state "MONITORING EVERY AIRCRAFT THAT ENTERS U.S. or Canadian airspace" in freaking all caps? simple question, really.
for reasons that escape me, you can't seem to understand that NO ONE other than some delusional conspiracy theorists think that it was NORAD's responsibility to monitor flights ORIGINATING in the united states pre-9/11. one ENTERING the US is a whole nother deal
It seems that you both do not understand the article nor what even The 9/11 Ommission Report says about NORAD's monitoring cababilities, and that you somehow accuse Major Martin and PM of being mistaken/wrong...?
Let's try something else: Do you have any problem in understanding what this man is saying?:
@Thetan1974 major martin and pm are not mistaken or wrong. NORAD did not track commercial flights originating in the United States. the guy who wrote this crap is deluded and he thinks NORAD monitored ALL commercial flights originating in the united states. his argument, are you denying that he believes this?
As an Imperial Star Destroyer captain, I received the standard censored version. But when this was revealed, I started to question the motives of doing this. Is George Lucas hiding something?
Obi Wan Kenobi was seen inside the Death Star just hours before the attack which would have given him time to plant explosives. Ben Kenobi happens to be the man who trained none other than Darth Vador himself. Why did the Death Star gunners stand down once the attacking Rebel fighters entered the Death Star trench?
Wake up people! The Death Star attack was an inside job!
How could a small missile cause an explosion that big? It has never happened once in history
Luke Skywalker was seen inside the Death Star just hours before the attack with individuals dressed in stormtrooper uniforms helping him escape! Plus he happens to be the son of Darth Vador himself.
The Death Star attack was an inside job to give the empire justification to invade Hoth!
Yet so many sheeple believe it was done by a bunch of nerf herder rebels.
Are you people blind? The Death Star was just a bunch of rebels who hate the empire, those of you who said Palpatine invaded Hoth just for oil are morons, we did it to protect us from these scum! GOD BLESS THE EMPIRE!
It's unnerving; the amount of comments on here saying "omg man it's a movie" and also the amount of comments questioning the nerd credentials of the creator.
Not only is this a joke (and a rather funny one at that), but I'd assume some of the 'evidence' (eg the x-wing S-foils) is intentionally bullshit regarding Star Wars canon to take the piss out of some of the more asinine 9/11 conspiracy theories.
And it;s also here to take the piss out of plot holes.
When Luke fired the proton torpedos, his S-foils were locked in attack position. The X-Wing travels much faster in the closed position. He also would have converted all power from shields and lasers into his engine, then just before the shockwave hit, he would have converted all power to the shields. As he gets farther away, there is less deceleration due to gravity. Thus, he was able to get away in time. You fail at being a nerd.
its a movie they half to be able to escape. and a government cover up, what its a movie and they are x-wings in there other mode. The ring is a sort of shook wave blast thing. the Ingcom company thing is so fake so how do u know them.
A proton torpedo is much slower than a Star fighter. After a 90 degree turn it would be moving much slower. The X-Wing looks just like a Z-95 headhunter minus 2 laser cannons which could have easily been attached by any half competent engineer.
Also, I think it ironic that if you respect this video's analogy between the rebel fighters and Al Qaeda, it's like saying Al Qaeda are the good guys and that the United States represents the Empire (which, I think it does, actually).
Furthermore, the ring described to be a separate event is actually the light from the explosion. As the camera's distance from the explosion is likely to be astronomical, we would be expected to experience the light before the sound of the shock wave (all of which would be moving faster than the artifacts of the destruction itself). And besides, in the Star Wars universe, there has been no comparable study such as that of NIST to support any official explanation of the Death Star. ;)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Firstly, although it refers to "anomalies'' regarding the appearance of the explosion accompanying the Death Star's destruction, it doesn't use any known physics to explain what they may be -- unlike the reference to the squibs which are seen ejecting from the twin towers and which are normally only seen during controlled demolitions.
As a 9/11 truth activist, I would just like to say that the Star Wars video about the Death Star destruction being an inside job was a funny one. But I wouldn't say it's an accurate depiction of, say, Loose Change, even though it uses, at least on the surface, the same film making techniques to get across it's point.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
MektRanzz, you made insightful and respectful comments, yet got thumbed down like crazy by all the people here. It's really sad that so many people are so upset by the idea that they can never even bring themselves to consider it rationally. Amazing and sad.
Shouting that 9/11 was an inside job does not make it true, if it was true, the tactics used by "truthers" make it very hard to respect their version of the 'truth'. Learn a little about true skepticism and you'll see what I mean.
We need part 2. I would ask how it was that Darth Vader conveniently "survived" the attack. Was he given foreknowledge of the event by a secret phone call?
Tget are x-wings, their air spoilers are in transit position. Do you remember the next order give. "Lock air spoilers into attack position" and on that command the wings extend apart.
arent the ships shown in that clip actualy x-wings? im pretty sure they are but im not a starw ars nut so i dont know every detail...but im pretty sure the x-wings can lock s foils or somethin like that to change the wing configuration for flight or combat purposes
Hard to say which is funnier: the vid's dry-witted mockery of neurotic conspiracy theorists, or all the neurotic, irony-impaired Troofers heightening the mockery by having a hissy fit in the comments.
hahaha! Thanks!! I appreciate the compliment. But actually you've got it backwards: Fox News sounds like _me_. After all, you don't think it's mere *coincidence* that Fox supports Israel the same way I do!?! No way, man - there's adeeper explanation for all of it...and you never can tell who's really pulling the strings....
No, you're missing the point of this which is not to compare the destruction of the Death Star to the Twin Towers. Rather, it is to satirize the "Loose Change" crowd. Also, you may argue that the Iraq War is about oil or whatever but 9-11 itself was religious fanatacism.
911 wasn't about religious fanatacism or anything like that.
The wtc was attacked because it was loosing money and was about to go redundant, so they bought it and when the attack happened they got insurance off it, plus the put options.
But who knows?
and, im not in the loose change crowd, this should not turn into a club that undertand and a different club that don't.
i can't remember the exact amount of money they got from insurance but it was around 7 billion.
the complex costs less then that but the point was larry was supose to use that money to rebuild the complex beacuse he owned the land, but he dosent want to pay for it and now the tax payers have to pay for it.
actually the real reason it's taking so long is both the unions and litigation from people who want to build a shrine to islam instead of the towers.
and no, the insurance money was not around 7 billion. more like around 50 million and the insurance deal costs 2 million. the buildings themselves costs way more than that...
Like I said, google "screw loose change". one of the better documentaries out there.
ive now looked at what larry got from the attacks, he did spend 3.2 billion like it says in this film, he put a 3.5 billion deal on acts of terrorism, and he did get 7 billion beacuse he got double the amount beacuse it was two different attacks.
i don't know why i looked at this beacuse its irrevlent to anything and proves nothing.
don't listen to anybody, look at the way the building fell and who you think can get more from the attacks.
It's been a while since I've seen it but I do remember the explanation about the insurance was given backed by actual documents from the financial transactions.
And oh yeah, I love how you say "if thats all you have to convince others that 911 was a conspiracy"
Its a conspiracy either way. If were to believe the official conspiracy theory, then 19 guys with box cutters (Rumsfeld says "Plastic knives") and an old cave man CONSPIRED to bring down the towers and attack the Pentagon.
That's actually an urban legend from the week after 9/11 that has long since been debunked. All the hijackers are dead as Dillinger. There are some other arabs who share the same name, who have long since been proven to be completely different people. We know exactly who each and every one of the hijackers are. And it is entirely plausible for a radical jihadi to rationalize screwing whores as long as they are infidel whores, just like it is perfectly okay to murder infidel civilians.
No, they did not see their photos. They are completely different people, who simply happened to have the same name. Every hijiacker's identity has been established and their death confirmed.
Mohammed Atta's father also later praised the 7/7 London bombings and spoke of an ongoing "religious war" in which there would be many more "fighters like my son." As for the hijackers' behavior, google "Takfir wal-Hijra."
Which doesn't change the fact that he called his son a "fighter" against the west. What do you think he meant by that, a prize fighter? If he thought his son was innocent, wouldn't he keep describing 9/12 call rather than conceding he was a terrorist? Do you think he'd be more clear-headed and honest a) ONE day after his son has supposedly died and been accused of the deaths of (at the time) 100's of 1000's of deaths or b) several years later? Heard of the five stages of grief?
Since you've done your own research and have concluded that 911 was an inside job, share with us just one bit of evidence you have. You know what? I'll save you some time. You have zero! All you're going to do in response is call me a name. That's not evidence. Get a girlfriend and prove to us you are not one of life's losers!
I was not going to call you a name, and I apologize for calling you an asshole. I will give evidence.
Theres a lot, Ill show 3:
1) Molten Metal- Steven Jones has examined previously Molten Metal in the towers, and found traces of Thermite. He has also looked at debris and videos and pointed out that there are many things that just look like signature thermite reactions.
"1) Molten Metal- Steven Jones has examined previously Molten Metal in the towers, and found traces of Thermite"
- False. Jones did not find thermite, he found traces of sulfur, and jumped to the conclusion that this "proved" thermite was used, when there are many other materials in the WTC, such as aluminum, which could have produced the traces of sulfur.
2) Insider Trading- The days before Sept.11, Put Options (Bets that stocks will fall) went to an all-time high for Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines, and a stock that owns 22 floors of the World Trade Center. Of course, these stock prices fell greatly after 9/11.
3) Witness reports report two VERY interesting things- Witnesses saw low level flashes and heard crackling.
Dude, don't you think if a few airliners flew into some buildings full of fuel it woldn't be uncommom for explosions for various reasons to be occuring? You're really playing stupid now and quite frankly if this is the best you have to convince others 911 was a conspiracy, you're on really thin ice.
Whatever noises they heard, they certainly weren't CDs, because they were heard long before the WTC collapse, and also they were heard at the base, and the collapse (or demo as you believe) happened way above at the point of the jet impact.
Put Options get placed on all kinds of stocks every day.
The building collapsed due to its weakened state long after the crash sounds were heard (and there are lots of things that could've caused those noises, like debris or corpses falling) so even if those sounds were explosions, they happened long prior to the collapse and therefore ar not responsible for bringing it down in a CD.
The Put Options SURGED to very high levels in the days leading up to September 11th. What would give investors the notion to suddenly place put options on Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines, and 22 floors of the World Trade Center?
These explosions may have happened prior to the collapse, but these explosions were big bangs (video evidence shows), and that is significant evidence to support the theory of charges going off.
I can easily explain the Put Options being heavy, which was investigated by the FBI, Treasury Dept, & IRS. There was significant bad news about AMR Corp (the parent company of American Airlines & primary client of Boeing) which reported losses which resulted in Morgan Stanley downgrading their rating of Boeing and AMR. So there is a logical explanation for all your questions.
Gret parody. Easy due to a great deal of suspension of disbelief in Star Wars AND any conspiracy. Especially on "the storm trooper effect" and the whole episode 6 plot. Using the 2 X-Wing modes as a poor straw man argument is just a fine parody. I bet JarJar did it!
Everyone knows that the X-Wing has two modes, attack mode, and cruising mode. When in cruising mode the wings are not extended. They move into the X formation when they begin their attack run. Jeez.
That's good, it's just like a real conspiracy show. But the bit at the end about the X-Wings is wrong. They change from flat wings to X-Wings for when they attack. It even shows that even the movie so that bit is all wrong. I liked the idea about the ring. That was an effect added in the 90s re-release. It's just a cool effect really but if you read it as a fact it doesn't make sense. It's good.
Dude...He's satirizing propaganda films. He did it on purpose. Propaganda films are notorious for taking footage out of context and discarding anything that doesn't fit their storyline. Duh
Those supposed "x wings" look more like Z-95 Headhunters, which can easily be fitted with remote operation controls to be used as training drones. Do they think we are stupid?
dgdfhfghgfhgfgffjhj 1 month ago
Hitler destroyed his countrys headquarters...
Mudachucha 5 months ago
that is a very clever title, sir.
UnemployedZombie 5 months ago
I love this vid, thank you.
stewcal5 5 months ago
LOL, to damn funny and such a honest reflection of every conspiracy lover on the internet
lastchip 6 months ago 2
Its all just a movie....CMON!!!
MasterBrick100 6 months ago
LOL, nicely done, this captures the idiocy of the TruTh!!!ELEVENTY!! tards perfectly.
goandfuckoff 6 months ago
FUCK ALL 9/11 TRUTHERS
azjeff1971 6 months ago 2
@azjeff1971 9/11 "truthers" wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass.
All of their claims have been scientifically debunked. Many times. Full explanations for each phenominum has been shown to not be what they claim. It is known as blind bias and ignorance that fuels their claims.
JRBeaman 6 months ago
Lolm this is a great comedy P.S., at 3:57 it's called locking S Foils.
pacman5698 6 months ago
@JPorter36 bitch im jakedean and i have two channels stay the FUCK off of them bitch, ur just trying to stir up stuff
KCArmstrongXIIV 7 months ago
@JPorter36 Defend your house self idk I didnt really think about what to say in a smart answer I wasnt trying or needing to show off... Wow you wanna be friends I will discuss numerous subjects with you its just hard being a single dad and dealing with trolls all the time over the raps I make. Wow theres a new can of worms so just have fun
JakeDean91909 7 months ago
@JPorter36 So how much time did you spend typing that... Wow your book smart can you hunt defend? I was just replying no Running for group support ass. I really dont know whats the deal with you but you a joke your not as smart as you think you are or you wouldnt even had replied... GEEK and bin laden and al qaeda are what I was talking ABOUT! do you have any proof that they actually took down the towers?
JakeDean91909 7 months ago
@JPorter36 your a fucking idiot listen to what the man is saying if the Government isnt to blame then prove them wrong by releasing all the information that was collected and NOW THEY HAVE FOUND BLASTING RESIDUE so now Can you back up your claim that Ghaad had anything to do with this any video tapes blue prints witness's?
JakeDean91909 7 months ago
Comment removed
eaglepoint23 7 months ago
Where Is Part 2? I Love This!!!! LOL!!!
Guitarman5150 9 months ago
Ya know, you really had me, until you said that the X-wings weren't really X-wings. They have their wings down for speed, and then extend them for attack maneuvers. Come on man!
zwgrad09 9 months ago 7
you're wrong... Stephen Speilberg orchestrated the whole thing, the official story AND alternative story are both fabrications by those "in the know" and that it's all just for show. The real motives behind Speilberg's display cannot be known!
secretbonus 1 year ago
An exhaust port in SPACE? There is no air in space, you don't put an open conduct so that air comes in and make it lead to the main reactor. And come on, what about the fake names.... Porkins?! Is that all they could come up with?
ultramarinegoat 1 year ago
@ultramarinegoat It's a thermal exhaust port according to the movie. It vents excess thermal energy. It doesn't bring stuff in. :)
fortehlulz9999 1 year ago
lolz, somethings are just Plain and visible before the nake eye, OF Course it was all filmed on a secret sound stage.
godofmars 1 year ago
I WANT PART TWO!!! This brings laughing tears to my eyes!!! I love it!! :-)
testdummy007 1 year ago
The explosion footage is faked, I've seen the original footage that didn't have a ring
trailersic 1 year ago
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL epic
regulatorzone 1 year ago
Clearly not a cover up! Not only that the whole last section failed. The craft was an X-Wing. Its S-foils were closed and not locked into attack position. Next you be saying those Y-Wings behind them are cardboard cut outs!!
You guys need to get over the fact the Empire has fallen and the Emperor is no more!
gg4tb 2 years ago
Why isn't anyone talking about Jar Jar? We know Palpatine had him transferred, but no one knows where he went, and other than one alleged sighting, no one has seen him since the Senate was disbanded!!1!
Did he really "just go home to his family" as SOME people would have us believe?
Or was murdered on Alderaan as so many TRUE websites claim? Was ALL of Alderaan destroyed just to prevent him from telling us what REALLY happened on 5/25?
Find Jar Jar, Find the TRUTH!
Taddare 2 years ago
Come on, was this done to ridicule 9/11 truthers? I think we have to analyse the hypocrisy:
1) Luke Skywalker used The Force - and we don't want to believe OBL and the 19 li'l hijackers used magic carpets, do we?
2) It's interesting that the hijackers are compared to the SW rebels and the Empire equals the US adm. Um - do debunkers approve of supporting the baddies?
3) Comparing reality to a movie??
This is a great example of Debunkers Cognitive Dissonance - or maybe dual perception.
Thetan1974 2 years ago
@Thetan1974 LoL. Someone can't take a joke.
TsukiTanaka 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 No, this is just a bit of light hearted fun. No matter what you believe happened on 9/11, you should always be able to laugh at yourself.
Maybe nobody takes your 'truth' seriously because you take yourselves a little too seriously.
karatechopgeo 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 you're dumb. this is a joke. say it with me. a joke. there is nothing to suggest this is a parallel event to 9/11. osama bin laden did not use the force, george bush is not palpatine. no one is comparing the movie to reality, only you. rather, the comparison is a fictional movie (star wars) to another fictional movie (loose change).
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
@theZodiacDigital
If Osama didn't use his magic wand, how did he create the phenomenons during the collapses of THREE WTC skyscrapers as put up by AE911Truth. org?
Why haven't NIST explained them - and not at all building 7? What sense does it make to state that "Releasing building 7 data could jeopardize public safety"?
And how did he make NORAD stand down?
The official story about 9/11 os clearly the fairy tale despite some errors in Loose Change and other 9/11 Truth documentaries.
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 i could tell you. but see, it doesn't matter. because you don't want to hear the truth. NORAD did not issue a stand down. that's a lie. watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q
of course it doesnt matter to you that it's false. this is why i won't spend more time addressing your claims. it would be a complete and utter waste of time.
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
@theZodiacDigital
It's you who can't accept the truth; NORAD did of course not "issue" a stand down, but they were "out of order"! THEY should have responded directly to the off course jets. NOT the FAA.
dnotice. org (The NORAD Papers VI)
Who pulled their plug? Osama from his cave??
LMFAO
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 no one pulled their plug. they were not out of order.
you're ignorant of the role of NORAD if you think it was their job - not the FAA's. i mean seriously even the dumbass site you gave me should give you hint.
"One ongoing mission of the Battle Management Center is to coordinate "air sovereignty" efforts, MONITORING EVERY AIRCRAFT THAT ENTERS [emphasis mine] U.S. or Canadian airspace"
that's ENTERING US AIRSPACE! that means from outside the country ENTERING the country.
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
@theZodiacDigital
Please read again: "The NORAD Papers VI"
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 What the fuck?? I did. I quoted your dumbass site and explained why their conclusion makes no sense. I can read it a million times and it's still wrong. Seriously, how dumb are you? When someone tells you why you're wrong, do you just repeat the very same thing endlessly? Here's a clue. Repeating the same shit over and over doesn't make it true.
As is stated on that site, NORAD would monitored a plane ENTERING the US airspace from outside... not a commercial flight within the US.
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
@theZodiacDigital
You can also go over the NIST Report and it will only make sense to those who are hell bent on believing that there's no inside job.
It's not really my problem that you don't understand the article. As it is clearly explained, NORAD would monitor and get info on every plane that go off radar, also domestic. Has nothing to do with keeping an eye on planes entering US airspace.
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 if it has "nothing to do with keeping an eye on planes entering US airspace" why does the article clearly state "MONITORING EVERY AIRCRAFT THAT ENTERS U.S. or Canadian airspace" in freaking all caps? simple question, really.
for reasons that escape me, you can't seem to understand that NO ONE other than some delusional conspiracy theorists think that it was NORAD's responsibility to monitor flights ORIGINATING in the united states pre-9/11. one ENTERING the US is a whole nother deal
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
@theZodiacDigital
It seems that you both do not understand the article nor what even The 9/11 Ommission Report says about NORAD's monitoring cababilities, and that you somehow accuse Major Martin and PM of being mistaken/wrong...?
Let's try something else: Do you have any problem in understanding what this man is saying?:
watch?v=JZNQq7XBLwc&feature=related
Thetan1974 1 year ago
@Thetan1974 major martin and pm are not mistaken or wrong. NORAD did not track commercial flights originating in the United States. the guy who wrote this crap is deluded and he thinks NORAD monitored ALL commercial flights originating in the united states. his argument, are you denying that he believes this?
theZodiacDigital 1 year ago
As an Imperial Star Destroyer captain, I received the standard censored version. But when this was revealed, I started to question the motives of doing this. Is George Lucas hiding something?
stardestroyer001 2 years ago
Obi Wan Kenobi was seen inside the Death Star just hours before the attack which would have given him time to plant explosives. Ben Kenobi happens to be the man who trained none other than Darth Vador himself. Why did the Death Star gunners stand down once the attacking Rebel fighters entered the Death Star trench?
Wake up people! The Death Star attack was an inside job!
MJB919 2 years ago
Death Star attack=inside job!
How could a small missile cause an explosion that big? It has never happened once in history
Luke Skywalker was seen inside the Death Star just hours before the attack with individuals dressed in stormtrooper uniforms helping him escape! Plus he happens to be the son of Darth Vador himself.
The Death Star attack was an inside job to give the empire justification to invade Hoth!
Yet so many sheeple believe it was done by a bunch of nerf herder rebels.
MJB919 2 years ago
lmao
kevinscales 2 years ago
stupid
starwarsfamilyguy0 2 years ago
so wheres the rest of it then???.
raabgunner 2 years ago
stupid
SuperHaloMaster117 2 years ago
Are you people blind? The Death Star was just a bunch of rebels who hate the empire, those of you who said Palpatine invaded Hoth just for oil are morons, we did it to protect us from these scum! GOD BLESS THE EMPIRE!
bozoinabox 2 years ago 16
leave star wars alone
TRUTHbe4yourEYES 2 years ago
X-wings can close and look like that
x-wings are my favorite space ship
Luigiforbrawl765 2 years ago
hilarious dude! +1
evert999 2 years ago
This is pure genius!!! LMAO
joeysmom6074 2 years ago
Excellent satire of the 9/11 anomaly hunters, lost in the minutia of apophenia and their confirmation bias.
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago 2
I think the hunters themselves are a means of trolling terrorism itself.
But yeah, this is awesome.
LulzIshall 2 years ago
Comment removed
ThorGoLucky 2 years ago
Clearly, the same people who were involved in the destruction of the Death Star were responsible for the destruction of WTC.
LunchAnderson 3 years ago
u got to remembur nineelevun noine elevun nain elevuuuuuuuuuuun!
LunchAnderson 3 years ago
Dude, you rule.
badnewswade 3 years ago
It's unnerving; the amount of comments on here saying "omg man it's a movie" and also the amount of comments questioning the nerd credentials of the creator.
Not only is this a joke (and a rather funny one at that), but I'd assume some of the 'evidence' (eg the x-wing S-foils) is intentionally bullshit regarding Star Wars canon to take the piss out of some of the more asinine 9/11 conspiracy theories.
And it;s also here to take the piss out of plot holes.
Cheer up guys, it's a joke.
holydave 3 years ago 2
dude it is a fucking movie. do you think any of the things in star wars are real
LetsEatRHCPs 3 years ago
He's making fun of a documentary called "Loose Change", which is a conspiracy theory about 9/11.
KillerAJ 3 years ago
awesome, pure genius
sh0ckerturb0 3 years ago
What happened to Manny Boffins?
soundmixer6393 3 years ago
(Dead)
asmunchr 2 years ago
Warsie, note which comment of yours I removed and watch your mouth.
skayhab 3 years ago
When Luke fired the proton torpedos, his S-foils were locked in attack position. The X-Wing travels much faster in the closed position. He also would have converted all power from shields and lasers into his engine, then just before the shockwave hit, he would have converted all power to the shields. As he gets farther away, there is less deceleration due to gravity. Thus, he was able to get away in time. You fail at being a nerd.
hellfishazeroth 3 years ago
MektRanzz is totally correct!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Darkrang55 3 years ago
its a movie they half to be able to escape. and a government cover up, what its a movie and they are x-wings in there other mode. The ring is a sort of shook wave blast thing. the Ingcom company thing is so fake so how do u know them.
Darkrang55 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you guys nerds or something.
kingchaunc 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont bother...lameass here assumes we dont know an X Wing has two flight profiles.
hey douche, it was an X Wing Fighter,flown by the alliance,and ruined their plans with it's successful attack.....deal
nature223 4 years ago
That's an X-Wing DAMMIT! It's that way because de S-Foils are not locked im the attack position
niuderdrastico 4 years ago
THAT's SO NERD!
niuderdrastico 4 years ago
A proton torpedo is much slower than a Star fighter. After a 90 degree turn it would be moving much slower. The X-Wing looks just like a Z-95 headhunter minus 2 laser cannons which could have easily been attached by any half competent engineer.
Xemnas255 4 years ago 2
wait...IIRC proton torpedoes are fuckin fast. not as fast as concussion missiles but still..
Warsie 3 years ago
Also, I think it ironic that if you respect this video's analogy between the rebel fighters and Al Qaeda, it's like saying Al Qaeda are the good guys and that the United States represents the Empire (which, I think it does, actually).
MektRanzz 4 years ago
more like the CIS vs Republic; the "Terrorists" and their supporters being the separitists.
Warsie 3 years ago
Furthermore, the ring described to be a separate event is actually the light from the explosion. As the camera's distance from the explosion is likely to be astronomical, we would be expected to experience the light before the sound of the shock wave (all of which would be moving faster than the artifacts of the destruction itself). And besides, in the Star Wars universe, there has been no comparable study such as that of NIST to support any official explanation of the Death Star. ;)
MektRanzz 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Firstly, although it refers to "anomalies'' regarding the appearance of the explosion accompanying the Death Star's destruction, it doesn't use any known physics to explain what they may be -- unlike the reference to the squibs which are seen ejecting from the twin towers and which are normally only seen during controlled demolitions.
MektRanzz 4 years ago
As a 9/11 truth activist, I would just like to say that the Star Wars video about the Death Star destruction being an inside job was a funny one. But I wouldn't say it's an accurate depiction of, say, Loose Change, even though it uses, at least on the surface, the same film making techniques to get across it's point.
MektRanzz 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
MektRanzz, you made insightful and respectful comments, yet got thumbed down like crazy by all the people here. It's really sad that so many people are so upset by the idea that they can never even bring themselves to consider it rationally. Amazing and sad.
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!
smitty121981 2 years ago
Shouting that 9/11 was an inside job does not make it true, if it was true, the tactics used by "truthers" make it very hard to respect their version of the 'truth'. Learn a little about true skepticism and you'll see what I mean.
kevinscales 2 years ago
We need part 2. I would ask how it was that Darth Vader conveniently "survived" the attack. Was he given foreknowledge of the event by a secret phone call?
AbecedariusRex 4 years ago
This is great!
outkid 4 years ago
"Now let's look at it upside down." Funniest line! But it was even more hilarious when it showed the two X Wings!
I love this video! Makes those stupid 9/11 conspiracy theorist look like dumbasses! As a Star Wars fan, I found this to be extremely funny!
RedeemingLight 4 years ago
it was cool till they mentioned how that wasn't an X-Wing, when it clearly was.
radicalaceshasbrin 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure that's the entire joke. Conspiracy theorists ignoring blatant facts to support their arguments and all.
BitVyper 4 years ago
Why were there stand down orders?
It looks "exactly like" a controlled demolition!
LOL! Love it!
Wez666 4 years ago
where's the part 2?
medziokliss 4 years ago
Tget are x-wings, their air spoilers are in transit position. Do you remember the next order give. "Lock air spoilers into attack position" and on that command the wings extend apart.
ScoobySnackAttack 4 years ago
Lock S-Foils into attack position!
Narfmaster 4 years ago 2
WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE?
I don't see no evidence
Even if you show me
Even if you tell me
I just like to whine and complain like some kind of stupid braying jackass
WhineAssQuestions 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Duh, WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE?
I CAN'T SEE ANY.
EVEN IF YOU SHOW IT TO ME.
I ONLY SUPPORT THE FAITH-BASED OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY.
WAQoWAQjob 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
9/11 was an inside job.
Don't blaspheme the 9/11 truth movement.
As a Warsie, the vid is nice
Warsie 4 years ago
i don't like how they blasphemed the 9/11 truth movment myself, but hey, its funny ,ppl will have their opinions
frnnk 4 years ago
9/11 was NOT an inside job you stupid fucking idiot!!!
poulopoulosjoshua 3 years ago
So, is there a part 2?
ColberFan47 4 years ago
This satire shows where americas heart is
ianfranklin1 4 years ago
HAHAHAHAHA
Brilliant!
PiOfFive 4 years ago 2
arent the ships shown in that clip actualy x-wings? im pretty sure they are but im not a starw ars nut so i dont know every detail...but im pretty sure the x-wings can lock s foils or somethin like that to change the wing configuration for flight or combat purposes
KillerXzen 4 years ago 2
If the author means to equate the official explanation of the events of 9/11 with science fiction, then "Mission Accomplished"!
BShinkicker 4 years ago
Hard to say which is funnier: the vid's dry-witted mockery of neurotic conspiracy theorists, or all the neurotic, irony-impaired Troofers heightening the mockery by having a hissy fit in the comments.
spynverzyon 4 years ago 3
you sound exactly like fox news spynverzyon. lol!!!
christophermarshall 4 years ago
hahaha! Thanks!! I appreciate the compliment. But actually you've got it backwards: Fox News sounds like _me_. After all, you don't think it's mere *coincidence* that Fox supports Israel the same way I do!?! No way, man - there's adeeper explanation for all of it...and you never can tell who's really pulling the strings....
Can you...?
spynverzyon 4 years ago 2
Dun dun duuuuunnnnn.....
Lonewolf20k 4 years ago
Lol very funny. I guess since I'm not a big star wars fan I'm probably wrong, but was that shock wave in the original version? Eh, gj anyway.
My god WTF has happened in the discussion panel. Jesus Christ can't you freakin people leave your political bullshit in a 9/11 video.
Andorian12 4 years ago
I don't know if i should find this funny or stupid.
your comparing star wars film with 911, that is stupid.
the quicker people understand that 911 was about oil and drugs the better.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
No, you're missing the point of this which is not to compare the destruction of the Death Star to the Twin Towers. Rather, it is to satirize the "Loose Change" crowd. Also, you may argue that the Iraq War is about oil or whatever but 9-11 itself was religious fanatacism.
skayhab 4 years ago
911 wasn't about religious fanatacism or anything like that.
The wtc was attacked because it was loosing money and was about to go redundant, so they bought it and when the attack happened they got insurance off it, plus the put options.
But who knows?
and, im not in the loose change crowd, this should not turn into a club that undertand and a different club that don't.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
You do realize that the insurance money you're talking about was much less than the cost of the loss of the actual buildings right?
Google "screw loose change" and "obsession: radical Islam's war on the west" and learn the truth.
ColonelSheppard 4 years ago
i can't remember the exact amount of money they got from insurance but it was around 7 billion.
the complex costs less then that but the point was larry was supose to use that money to rebuild the complex beacuse he owned the land, but he dosent want to pay for it and now the tax payers have to pay for it.
thats why the new wtc is taking so long to build.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
actually the real reason it's taking so long is both the unions and litigation from people who want to build a shrine to islam instead of the towers.
and no, the insurance money was not around 7 billion. more like around 50 million and the insurance deal costs 2 million. the buildings themselves costs way more than that...
Like I said, google "screw loose change". one of the better documentaries out there.
ColonelSheppard 4 years ago
ok i see.
i do know each of the two towers costs around 1 billion.
ive been given so many numbers in how much money was made from the complex, i don't know who to believe.
no offence, but i don't trust you. :)
im just trying to figure this whole thing out like lots of other people.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
hey if you trusted me, I wouldn't trust you :p
But SLC is a great explanation of the claims 9/11 conspiracy theory believers make.
ColonelSheppard 4 years ago
ive now looked at what larry got from the attacks, he did spend 3.2 billion like it says in this film, he put a 3.5 billion deal on acts of terrorism, and he did get 7 billion beacuse he got double the amount beacuse it was two different attacks.
i don't know why i looked at this beacuse its irrevlent to anything and proves nothing.
don't listen to anybody, look at the way the building fell and who you think can get more from the attacks.
make up your own mind.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
everybody should make up there own mind and should be free to express there views without been bullied.
im fed up of people calling each other conspiracy nuts, stupid, idiot.......
i wish people would grow up.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
when i said
he did spend 3.2 billion like it says in this film
i mean the proper loose change.
not this rubbish film.
christophermarshall 4 years ago
oh, by the way, did you find out the money clamed was 50 million from screw loose change?
christophermarshall 4 years ago
It's been a while since I've seen it but I do remember the explanation about the insurance was given backed by actual documents from the financial transactions.
ColonelSheppard 4 years ago
And oh yeah, I love how you say "if thats all you have to convince others that 911 was a conspiracy"
Its a conspiracy either way. If were to believe the official conspiracy theory, then 19 guys with box cutters (Rumsfeld says "Plastic knives") and an old cave man CONSPIRED to bring down the towers and attack the Pentagon.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
The "official" conspiracy theory? As opposed to what? Imitation ones? GreatHaku, the more you talk, the more you're making a fool out of yourself!
MGR1900 4 years ago
Well, by definition, the official story is a conspiracy theory.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
It is not a theory. We know for a fact who carried it out. Mohammed Atta's cell of 19 hijackers.
waltereg0 4 years ago
Some of them turned up alive, protesting their innocence. Mohammed Atta's father claimed that he got a phone call from Atta on Sept.12, 2001.
The FBI even admits that some of the hijackers' identities are questionable, so it's a theory.
Considering the MASSIVE AMOUNTS of evidence, the official story is nothing more than a theory.
The alleged hijackers weren't even fanatical Muslims. They fooled around with prostitutes!
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
That's actually an urban legend from the week after 9/11 that has long since been debunked. All the hijackers are dead as Dillinger. There are some other arabs who share the same name, who have long since been proven to be completely different people. We know exactly who each and every one of the hijackers are. And it is entirely plausible for a radical jihadi to rationalize screwing whores as long as they are infidel whores, just like it is perfectly okay to murder infidel civilians.
waltereg0 4 years ago
No. Some of them reported seeing their photos on tv. It wasnt just name-crisis.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
No, they did not see their photos. They are completely different people, who simply happened to have the same name. Every hijiacker's identity has been established and their death confirmed.
waltereg0 4 years ago
Mohammed Atta's father also later praised the 7/7 London bombings and spoke of an ongoing "religious war" in which there would be many more "fighters like my son." As for the hijackers' behavior, google "Takfir wal-Hijra."
hhtf 4 years ago
That doesn't change the fact he claimed to recieve a september 12 phone-call from him.
If anyone wants to get hard-hitting information on 911 go to the geocities website, Killtown. He has a list of 250+ Smoking guns.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Which doesn't change the fact that he called his son a "fighter" against the west. What do you think he meant by that, a prize fighter? If he thought his son was innocent, wouldn't he keep describing 9/12 call rather than conceding he was a terrorist? Do you think he'd be more clear-headed and honest a) ONE day after his son has supposedly died and been accused of the deaths of (at the time) 100's of 1000's of deaths or b) several years later? Heard of the five stages of grief?
hhtf 4 years ago
9/11 WAS an inside job! Do your own research! Don't just think its all been debunked! Do your OWN research!
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Since you've done your own research and have concluded that 911 was an inside job, share with us just one bit of evidence you have. You know what? I'll save you some time. You have zero! All you're going to do in response is call me a name. That's not evidence. Get a girlfriend and prove to us you are not one of life's losers!
MGR1900 4 years ago
I was not going to call you a name, and I apologize for calling you an asshole. I will give evidence.
Theres a lot, Ill show 3:
1) Molten Metal- Steven Jones has examined previously Molten Metal in the towers, and found traces of Thermite. He has also looked at debris and videos and pointed out that there are many things that just look like signature thermite reactions.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
"1) Molten Metal- Steven Jones has examined previously Molten Metal in the towers, and found traces of Thermite"
- False. Jones did not find thermite, he found traces of sulfur, and jumped to the conclusion that this "proved" thermite was used, when there are many other materials in the WTC, such as aluminum, which could have produced the traces of sulfur.
waltereg0 4 years ago
He didn't just find Sulfur. Watch his part in Terrorstorm to hear about the other things he found, which shouldn't have been there.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
2) Insider Trading- The days before Sept.11, Put Options (Bets that stocks will fall) went to an all-time high for Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines, and a stock that owns 22 floors of the World Trade Center. Of course, these stock prices fell greatly after 9/11.
3) Witness reports report two VERY interesting things- Witnesses saw low level flashes and heard crackling.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Keep talking. I'll just watch you post and I'll sit back and watch the entertainment!
MGR1900 4 years ago
Now who's pulling insults.
Let's see you refute those 3 pieces of evidence. Here's an even better idea. Go out and do your own research!
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Easy! Debunking911 dot com. It's THE website that shuts up all you paranoid dilusional, LSD taking, pot smoking, hippie, conspirary losers!
MGR1900 4 years ago
Witnesses saw low level flashes and heard crackling! LOL! Yep! That's it! CONSPIRACY!
MGR1900 4 years ago
That's just one piece of evidence in a long-line. Why would a plane that crashed on the higher levels trigger low-level flashes and sounds.
All Witnesses reported multiple explosions and bomb-like explosions going off all over the place.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Dude, don't you think if a few airliners flew into some buildings full of fuel it woldn't be uncommom for explosions for various reasons to be occuring? You're really playing stupid now and quite frankly if this is the best you have to convince others 911 was a conspiracy, you're on really thin ice.
MGR1900 4 years ago
No, theirs A LOT more. Do your own research, man. You'll see the questions rise.
And these explosions were on the base. The fires were at higher levels.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
The collapse occurred at higher levels, so any "explosion" at the base therefore had nothing to do with the collapse far above.
waltereg0 4 years ago
Perhaps.. but that's not my point. My point is, how could a jet crashing into the higher levels touch the basement floors.
Have you ever heard William Rodriguez' account? He hears explosions on the lower levels.
One witness saw 6 brief flashes being emitted just before the building collapsed.
Another witness reported seeing bright flashes bursting from the base.
Firefighters also spoke of crackling sounds.
Crackling sounds & Low-level flashes is signature for CDs.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
Whatever noises they heard, they certainly weren't CDs, because they were heard long before the WTC collapse, and also they were heard at the base, and the collapse (or demo as you believe) happened way above at the point of the jet impact.
waltereg0 4 years ago
So what?
Put Options get placed on all kinds of stocks every day.
The building collapsed due to its weakened state long after the crash sounds were heard (and there are lots of things that could've caused those noises, like debris or corpses falling) so even if those sounds were explosions, they happened long prior to the collapse and therefore ar not responsible for bringing it down in a CD.
waltereg0 4 years ago
The Put Options SURGED to very high levels in the days leading up to September 11th. What would give investors the notion to suddenly place put options on Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines, and 22 floors of the World Trade Center?
These explosions may have happened prior to the collapse, but these explosions were big bangs (video evidence shows), and that is significant evidence to support the theory of charges going off.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
I can easily explain the Put Options being heavy, which was investigated by the FBI, Treasury Dept, & IRS. There was significant bad news about AMR Corp (the parent company of American Airlines & primary client of Boeing) which reported losses which resulted in Morgan Stanley downgrading their rating of Boeing and AMR. So there is a logical explanation for all your questions.
seattlepi dot nwsource dot com/ business/38213_boeing08 dot shtml
waltereg0 4 years ago
Great vid! The Loose Change idiot should be shot for being a traitor to the US. If this was WWII, he would have been shot already.
MGR1900 4 years ago
For speaking his mind, MGR? You are an outright asshole! Those very words you just typed and posted prove you hate Freedom Of Speech.
GreatHakuProductions 4 years ago
No, for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
MGR1900 4 years ago
Oh my god he's right, none of it adds up! I'm going to preach this to all my friends/family/co-workers!
Xethemez 4 years ago
superb - and a great article too
conradslater 4 years ago
Gret parody. Easy due to a great deal of suspension of disbelief in Star Wars AND any conspiracy. Especially on "the storm trooper effect" and the whole episode 6 plot. Using the 2 X-Wing modes as a poor straw man argument is just a fine parody. I bet JarJar did it!
olllj 4 years ago
Everyone knows that the X-Wing has two modes, attack mode, and cruising mode. When in cruising mode the wings are not extended. They move into the X formation when they begin their attack run. Jeez.
christianelliott 5 years ago
Loos change had worse straw man arguments than this.
olllj 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
/f/'in nerd
frnnk 4 years ago
That's good, it's just like a real conspiracy show. But the bit at the end about the X-Wings is wrong. They change from flat wings to X-Wings for when they attack. It even shows that even the movie so that bit is all wrong. I liked the idea about the ring. That was an effect added in the 90s re-release. It's just a cool effect really but if you read it as a fact it doesn't make sense. It's good.
Phwalalabah 5 years ago
Dude...He's satirizing propaganda films. He did it on purpose. Propaganda films are notorious for taking footage out of context and discarding anything that doesn't fit their storyline. Duh
JudoSnakey 5 years ago
Okay, no need for a "Duh" there. We are actually coming from the same angle here. I do realize what it's all about.
Phwalalabah 5 years ago
Amazing!!!
SkyDude79 5 years ago
This is great!
SkyDude79 5 years ago
why?
peterfett 5 years ago
Do a search here on YouTube for "Loose Change, 9-11"
skayhab 5 years ago