9/11 Conspiracy Theories - P.11e Twin Towers Contolled Demo?

[ArbeitMachtFreiUSA]

OBSERVE *how much time* the LYING SHILLS spend "debunking" (they'd like to think) the clear and obvious fact 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB.

You will QUICKLY REALIZE that THE 9/11 COVERUP IS IN PROGRESS when there is SO MUCH EFFORT and so much of it is OUTRIGHT LIES AND DISINFORMATION. It looks like Karl Rove stays pretty busy managing his band of right-wing flying monkeys for Bush.

Could be part of why Rove left the White House, to devote more time to propping up the coverup.

[911NeverForget]

another LiarExposer account...

[911NeverForget]

where did you get THAT from? i did do what the video says. i guess you didnt watch the whole thing...

[bukkake2007]

"where did you get THAT from? i did do what the video says. i guess you didnt watch the whole thing..."

well wot exactly did u do then? wot does the video say?

[911NeverForget]

why do i have to explain what i did? i did what i was doing in the video: debunking the reports of explosives being bombs.

[bukkake2007]

yeah except u didnt "debunk" those reports u just offered an alternative explanation. there is no way 2 prove wot those guys heard, we can only guess. do u get that??? it could b either way. also copying exactly wot debunking911 says could almost b called plagiarism.

[911NeverForget]

you're still saying that copied it. no i did not. you have no proof of that.

[bukkake2007]

they use the exact same argument, almost the exact same words as u use!!! u say that when ppl think of terrorists they think of bombs, implying that they thought there were bombs there, just like debunking911 says. u also just cast doubt by emphasising the word "appeared". just like debunking911.

so while u did show 1 or 2 quotes taken out of context u have by no means debunked anything.

[911NeverForget]

and no one else uses the same info? CTists change their claims, but we dont. we use the same sources. we use the same arguments.

i state most of that stuff anyway.

again, i DID debunk it. this is another type of CTist behavior: deny that i debunked anything.

[bukkake2007]

how exactly did u debunk it? u never explained how.

"you're still saying that copied it. no i did not"

u went from denying that u were copying and then saying that its ok. blaming it on "typical ctist behaviour" is a copout.

[911NeverForget]

i did explain it somewhat. look up.

i didnt blame you for it. i didnt say it was okay.

[bukkake2007]

"debunking the reports of explosives being bombs."

u did not do that, u just gave another possibility of wot they couldve meant.

"i didnt say it was okay."

no but u implied that it wasnt bad, and im not saying it is. the thing is u lied about not copying then u admitted it.

[911NeverForget]

yes, and when i did that, i debunked what CTists assume it is.

no but u implied that it wasnt bad, and im not saying it is. the thing is u lied about not copying then u admitted it.

where did i imply that it wasnt bad?

i never admitted it. ive never lied about it.

[bukkake2007]

"you're still saying that copied it. no i did not."

"and no one else uses the same info?"

isnt using the same info copying?? unless u acknowledge ur source its called plagiarism too. by asking that question ur implying that its ok.

also u didnt debunk wot cts assume those quotes mean. the only way 2 do that would b 2 talk 2 the witnesses themselves and ask them wot they meant, coz anything we say is just speculation.

[911NeverForget]

when i mean that, i mean that we ALL use it. im not implying that its okay.

[bukkake2007]

"im not implying that its okay."

so ur doing it even though u dnt think its ok? so then wot did u do in this video that hasnt been done before?

[911NeverForget]

i never said or implied that it was NOT okay either.

[bukkake2007]

so ur indifferent about it then? the question still remains though, wot did u do or say that hasnt been already done?

[911NeverForget]

"so ur indifferent about it then?"

basically, i have mixed views about it.

"the question still remains though, wot did u do or say that hasnt been already done?"

any theories that i havent covered on my videos yet. ;)

[bukkake2007]

"any theories that i havent covered on my videos yet."

i meant in this particular video.

[911NeverForget]

"i meant in this particular video."

honestly, im not sure. i tend to forget a few theories, but when i see what i missed i usually cover it in the next video. ;)

[bukkake2007]

"honestly, im not sure."

ur not sure wot u accomplished with this video that hasnt already been done?

[911NeverForget]

"ur not sure wot u accomplished with this video that hasnt already been done?"

no, i mean if i forgot any theories in the vid.

[mafaldacrumbwitty]

what is spelled w-h-a-t. Not wot. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you can't spell.

[bukkake2007]

well done, uve managed 2 put the very argument that debunking911 already uses on video. bravo.

[911NeverForget]

since when? i say that debunking911 debunks the CLAIM. nice way to draw to conclusions.

[bukkake2007]

dude, ur argument is exactly the same, same premises and almost same dialogue, u just made a vid about it. it has by no means been debunked, its just an alternative explanation. alternative explanations rnt proof man.

[911NeverForget]

debunking means to disprove. what did i do in the vid? tell the story of the Three Little Pigs?

[bukkake2007]

u may as well have 4 all the disproving u did. an alternative explanation does not disprove anything. do u know wot i mean?

[911NeverForget]

it doesnt because i DIDNT have a A.E. i debunked it.

[bukkake2007]

how did u debunk it then dude? all u did was show how sum quotes were taken out of context and that others couldve meant other things when they said explosions. 2 me, proving something wrong would mean that theres no doubt they meant those other things. u expressed probability, not certainty.

[911NeverForget]

quotes, links, etc. i showed how quotes were taken out of context. for those who think they werent, would that be disproving?

[bukkake2007]

so were u just trying 2 show that some quotes were taken out of context or were u trying 2 show that wot those guys heard werent explosions from bombs but something else?

[911NeverForget]

both.

[bukkake2007]

well wot exactly did u debunk then? the 1st part was just an example of quote twisting, nothing 2 disprove there. the 2nd didnt disprove wot ppl say, it just gives another way of interpreting wot those witnesses said.

[911NeverForget]

what is the topic of this video?

[bukkake2007]

that some ppl give quotes of ppl saying that they heard explosions. u say that they didnt hear bombs but the sound of floors pancaking or other explosions. that doesnt prove anything. the only thing u proved was that some quotes were taken out of context, but doesnt mean the witnesses didnt hear bombs.

[911CommissionCoverup]

Who are you going to believe?

A) A few LYING right-wing losers like the author of this video who go to AN AWFUL LOT OF WORK trying to maintain the 9/11 coverup to protect the real mass murderers?

B) HUNDREDS of professional architects, engineers, physicists and other scientists, pilots, and educated people of all types, NOW including 7 CIA veterans! See my profile for details...

LET THE TRUTH BE KNOWN!

[911NeverForget]

5th time: quit posting the same crap on every one of my videos.

[ghk13287]

"5th time: quit posting the same crap on every one of my videos." To me, anyone who posts the word-for-word same thing on multiple videos is a spammer. So, I mark those as spam.

[911NeverForget]

i probably would do the same.

[debunkin]

Wow how biased of a comment can you get.

[debunkin]

I'm and I think that the conspiracy theorist make me look bad.

[debunkin]

I'm a democrat. And i think that the theorist make me look bad.

[dav0820]

Here we go again. Watch "Loose Change" and find out those guys or constantly having to re-edit their little movie because it has been debunked so many times. 60 Mintues, Popular Mechanics,Discovery channel hav all debunked it. Your losing your power base!

[911NeverForget]

dav, theres people still denying it, and the theories still exist today.

you CTists will deny everything.

[dav0820]

These CTists will not accept the truth. If they did they would have to leave their parents basement and get a job.

[911NeverForget]

ding!

[livanletliv]

The governments Mind Control fairy tale and cartoon hoax is the biggest, most improbable, most unbelievable Conspiracy Theory of all.LIES AND MORE LIES!  Arrest the Mass Murderers and Traitors NOW!!

The War on Terror is a War on the American people and our freedoms. WAKE UP NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE

[joeystockdale]

Since 911 Halliburtons stock has gone up 2000% Black water has made billions, The Carlyle Group has made billions and the fed has printed a trillion dollars for this war all being attached with debt that our childrens children will pay for all while your chasing boogie men in caves. What a scam!

[911NeverForget]

proof?

[ghk13287]

"Since 911 Halliburtons stock has gone up 2000% Black water has made billions," So, every stock that went up since 911 was part of the plot? I know the plot is big, but this is insane. Wait - it's a truther comment, so it's insane by definition.

[mt3355]

You lost me at pancaked. That has been proven wrong cosidering the building fell too fast. Watch the videos closely. Also if what your saying is true then why haven't all the other buildings design the same way been examined for the same kinds of failure. These buildings were build well. This is all basic stuff.

[911NeverForget]

fell "too fast?" ive debunked this in another video. they didnt fall too fast.

thats because the possibilities of the same thing happening to them are low.

they werent built as well as you think. after all, they collapsed.

[joeystockdale]

Inside job!

[911NeverForget]

proof?

[joeystockdale]

911never and washdcdem. The Laws of Physics. Do you read? Can you understand simple laws of nature like Inertia, Conservation, gravity? Have you read Operation Northwoods? Oh yea you don't read.

[911NeverForget]

have CTists read The Laws of Physics? some of them completely assume that 9/11 didnt go by this!

[joeystockdale]

Who?

[911NeverForget]

CTists: a shorter way of saying "conspiracy theorists."

[joeystockdale]

Your right, the laws of physics were circumvented with the use of thermate and explosives. Glad to see your getting it.

[911NeverForget]

since when have i never gotten it? CTists dont get it.

[WashDCDemocrat]

Screw yourself, this was Osama's handiwork, not the work of the White House.

[joeystockdale]

Washdc. "Srewyourself" Great argument, you must be a real big brained scholar.

[911NeverForget]

thats because he isnt as much of a debunker as me. (no offense WashDC. ;) )

hes just stating what debunkers are trying to say.

[WashDCDemocrat]

911NeverForget tells it like it is.

[dav0820]

This has already been debunked by Popular Mechanics Magazine and Discovery channel.

Go get a job hippie!!

[911NeverForget]

so? debunking911 debunked it. is the theory gone? no. CTists need to get a job.