ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
your a fool, calling hovind a liar, he backs everything he says with science and scripture put together. fools calling the wise a liar haha classic. and why would u hate on a creationist jus because its a different view point. because u dont like the fact that their is a God and u will have to take account the things you do on this earth one day...your either go to heaven if you accept Jesus Christ or go to Hell for rejecting Him.
To be fair, he only complained about hitler trying to speed up the process of natural selection. which is obviously, unnatural. he didn't contradict himself
Richard Dawkins got ownd by William Lane Craig, Craig also owned Christopher Hitchens bad even the atheists admitted he got pwnt.
TheGeneralOfWar 1 hour ago
HAHAHAHAH. You could check out his website. OMG HAHAHAHHA
nm2w 2 months ago
banana proof for evolution? WTF!
ProMajtas 3 months ago
Skip to 0:34
lovingboarding 4 months ago
Natural selection evidently buried both Stalin and Hitler
slaviczech 5 months ago
The Banana Joke WAS EPIC!!! So many levels of Pure Genius!
MrLittletomdj 5 months ago 5
why they all act like they don't know he's an act!?
omarlives 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52
Grade school level lies are not an argument.
The real world is not evil, it's extraordinary.
Ryakki 5 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52
from worm to human? seriously? you wrote an article about evolution but know nothing about it???
Kiesel 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read my popular Internet articles: ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE
Mogley52 6 months ago
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from traits having survival value. It doesn't produce those traits. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed in design or useless.
Mogley52 6 months ago
Folklore was a way for Ancient People to teach their young ones to respect each other and find basic understandings of the world....
Then some ass that believed Santa Clause was real decided to teach his young that the entire world revolves around them and shit....idk
KenFan4life 7 months ago
lol the homos you meet on the street
xBlackOrgasm 7 months ago
Not sure if the earth is 6,000 year old or billions, but I do believe God did it!
jrichard1977 7 months ago
your a fool, calling hovind a liar, he backs everything he says with science and scripture put together. fools calling the wise a liar haha classic. and why would u hate on a creationist jus because its a different view point. because u dont like the fact that their is a God and u will have to take account the things you do on this earth one day...your either go to heaven if you accept Jesus Christ or go to Hell for rejecting Him.
DaBesGuy13 10 months ago
@DaBesGuy13 hmmmmmmm............
theeyeofreason1 8 months ago
@DaBesGuy13 Brainwashed. Yes you are, sir.
Ottoplemeniti 8 months ago
@DaBesGuy13 LMFAO SURE BUDDY.
Powerlifter83 6 months ago
rofl "there's different names for it..."
corporalcharlie 10 months ago
To be fair, he only complained about hitler trying to speed up the process of natural selection. which is obviously, unnatural. he didn't contradict himself
badazz1989 11 months ago
hahaha i wonder why any of these guys even went on this guys show lol
yhwhizlife1 1 year ago
@yhwhizlife1 cause they had NO idea what they were getting into, or to try and put their ideologies on air. lol
dogonname 9 months ago
kent hovinds arguement is the biggest load of shit ive ever heard, its scary that theres people that dumb in the world!
AFIEBHC 1 year ago
Superb ending.
karlkarlkarl1234 1 year ago
Don't ever compare Darwin with Hitler...
Hejzwej 1 year ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@Hejzwej ahhhhhhh hitler and darwin, such like minded individuals. you can take offence, but truth is truth, they were very like minded.
IWantToKnowChrist 6 months ago
@Hejzwej i do it all the time.
ProMajtas 3 months ago
@Hejzwej hhhah only the stupidest moron would, darwin saw the beauty of nature and truth, hitler misinterpreted and ignored the real truth.
Etrajbe 2 months ago
Comment removed
psbartolomeo 1 year ago
This is the funniest shit I ever seen in youtube.
JerezJulio 1 year ago