This stuff about demolition has been refuted many times over. There are tons of eyewitnesses of the planes hitting the buildings - idiots. There is plenty of other evidence too. Anyone who tries to claim otherwise is either blind, gullible or a deliberate liar.
The essential explanation is that the top storey below the plane hit-point had to bare the weight of the falling storeys above the hit-point, when the supports around the hit-point gave way. The top storey could not bare this weight, and in turn that gave way too. Rinse and repeat, except with the added weight of another storey for each failed storey, until you nothing but a pile of rubble.
But yes, other 9/11 debunking websites go into far greater detail.
This stuff about demolition has been refuted many times over. There are tons of eyewitnesses of the planes hitting the buildings - idiots. There is plenty of other evidence too. Anyone who tries to claim otherwise is either blind, gullible or a deliberate liar.
EquineDreams 5 months ago
@EquineDreams
The essential explanation is that the top storey below the plane hit-point had to bare the weight of the falling storeys above the hit-point, when the supports around the hit-point gave way. The top storey could not bare this weight, and in turn that gave way too. Rinse and repeat, except with the added weight of another storey for each failed storey, until you nothing but a pile of rubble.
But yes, other 9/11 debunking websites go into far greater detail.
BlackstoneGod 2 months ago