If you want a thought upon the editing - I think the sound effect cuts in slightly too early. You'd have to be flying about four foot away from the back end for there to be no time lag at all on that! Mild camera shaking would be the least of your worries.
F-14A tomcat,look at the nozzles before expanding.And the two things right between the engine intakes are the pylons for the aim-54 "phoenix" long range aam.They had a range of 150 nautical miles and the aim-54 c was also capable of locking onto ships aswell as aircraft.
wen i use the tomcat, or anyother aircraft tht uses a jet, i dont see the fire coming out the back?? is there a specific setting i need to hve for the graphics?
Wrong. It doesn't add fuel to the engine. It squirts fuel into the exhaust behind the engines. Exhaust is hot enough to melt metal, so the fuel ignites instantly. Afterburners don't affect the engine. Read up on it.
who told you it had more payload and range? it actually has only half the tomcat's capability. they have done tests, flying tomcats and hornets against super hornets, and the super hornets always ran out of fuel, placed last, and carried the least of all three planes.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the F/A-18 E/F is actually more agile, carries more payload, and has better range and 50% fewer parts than this big cat. and its cheaper and stealtier with better avionics and radar.
More agile? Maybe. Bigger payload? No. Better range? Not a chance. Cheaper? The initial cost is about the same, but the maintenance is where the Super Hornet wins out. The Tomcat was designed as a fleet defence fighter to protect against cruise missiles and bombers. has to have a long ass range, where the Super Hornet does not.
FINALLY!!!!!!!!! may be a bit late replying but someone who isn't brainwashed at how "brilliant" the super hornet is when it clearly isnt! im an ex tomcat pilot and i hate people saying how great the hornet is!!
looks like a modified f-14D variant
RezViper 1 year ago
I don't see the goal of this video, it isn't the real reactors!
Oliwierw 1 year ago
If you want a thought upon the editing - I think the sound effect cuts in slightly too early. You'd have to be flying about four foot away from the back end for there to be no time lag at all on that! Mild camera shaking would be the least of your worries.
Ropponmatsu2 1 year ago
nice effects.....but i hate the old F-14Bs.....the D model's way better.
6V92TA 2 years ago
@6V92TA either way they both suck.
TomcatSucks4ever2 2 years ago
@TomcatSucks4ever2 Here we go with a flamer.....
6V92TA 2 years ago
this is not F-14B it+s F-14A, Yes D model is better , but for me F-14A has better look :D
glazuna 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we enjoy flying "Flight Simulator"?
(2) What does make us to play Flight Simulator over and over again?
(3) Why do some of us prefer to fly fighter (eg. F-16) instead of commerical aeroplanes (eg. 747)?
(4) If Flight Simulator allows us to choose your desired jet engines or to modify aeroplanes, will this be fun for players?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
how do u do that?
neykku 2 years ago
sweet, i have vegas pro 8.0, how do u get the screen shake effect?
FsxfleetRobertw 2 years ago
hehe i love the iris f-14 one of the best jets in fsx
blazefox2 3 years ago
how did those after burners work? all my freeware fighter jets F/A 18, F16, F14, F-22, none of their after burners work. help.
HairTriggerRaptor 3 years ago
shift+ f4
acturboy 2 years ago
How do u set afterburner????????
010Daoudi010 3 years ago
how do u get an f14 on fsx, please someone let me in on this amazing shit!
pnye01 3 years ago
how do you get the f 14 on fsx? send me the link.
GuitarFlighter9 3 years ago
it's payware so pay for it
grame141 2 years ago
That is just like from the one Training Mission Scene in Top Gun when there is that Real Close up of the Afterburner.
bstep13 3 years ago
Greetings! -Maverick
I have a need... A NEED FOR SPEED!!! -Maverick and Goose
ryanlim2002 3 years ago
F-14A tomcat,look at the nozzles before expanding.And the two things right between the engine intakes are the pylons for the aim-54 "phoenix" long range aam.They had a range of 150 nautical miles and the aim-54 c was also capable of locking onto ships aswell as aircraft.
tomcatfour 3 years ago
the phoenix couldn't lock on to ships.....it was specifically an air to air missile.
gonavy29 3 years ago
Dude, those graphics are pretty hot
howd ya get it so high?
blurraptor22 3 years ago
He probably edited it on sony vegas, but thats just a guess.
9TKyuubi 3 years ago
same here,i cant get any of my effects to work other than runway effects
panzerkiller13 3 years ago
wen i use the tomcat, or anyother aircraft tht uses a jet, i dont see the fire coming out the back?? is there a specific setting i need to hve for the graphics?
coolman17701 3 years ago
you have to put the "internals" of the effects folder into the FS effects folder, same goes for gauges and stuff.
Mustang1204 3 years ago
i got FSx lol but the 1 thing i never new was what the afterburner do. can some 1 tell me ASAP?
killingbomb0 3 years ago
it speeds up aircraft by adding more fuel to the engine in a very inefficient manner...
afterburners suck fuel at increased rate, so basically they are only used when you need to push the engines to their limits.
nameless0193 3 years ago
Wrong. It doesn't add fuel to the engine. It squirts fuel into the exhaust behind the engines. Exhaust is hot enough to melt metal, so the fuel ignites instantly. Afterburners don't affect the engine. Read up on it.
emoklan 3 years ago
I know that, lol, i just simplified it a bit, and yes, the location where this fuel gets squirted can still be considered a part of engine...
nameless0193 3 years ago
actually yeah it is a tomcat look at how the engines are set up rtard
Mig4512 4 years ago
Nice CG!
VSkwidd 4 years ago
you could cook many hot dogs with that.
wog222 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ANT NO TOM CAT
clockwork624 4 years ago
it is a tomcat, didn't u see the cockpit style when it rolled?
dtn94 4 years ago 3
dude its the IRIS F-14A.
flooglafish 4 years ago
how can i use War planes in FSX is it like addon or ?
AntichristForEver 4 years ago
Can you please tell me, how afterburner works? PLEASE! I can't get it work!
PS: REALLY GOOOOOD VIDEO!!!
RamaLamaDingDon 4 years ago
u press i in fsx
bensonak47 4 years ago
put the F-14 effects in the effects folder in the main fsx or 2004 folder
flooglafish 4 years ago
those afterburner effects kick ass
billy2757 4 years ago
who told you it had more payload and range? it actually has only half the tomcat's capability. they have done tests, flying tomcats and hornets against super hornets, and the super hornets always ran out of fuel, placed last, and carried the least of all three planes.
stealthf14d 4 years ago
what airplane is that?
wasifyar 4 years ago
F-14 Tomcat, designed by Grumman (now Northrop Grumman). replaced by the F/A-18E/F Sewer Hornet, stupidest decision navy ever made
stealthf14d 4 years ago
thanks man
wasifyar 4 years ago
no prob
stealthf14d 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the F/A-18 E/F is actually more agile, carries more payload, and has better range and 50% fewer parts than this big cat. and its cheaper and stealtier with better avionics and radar.
raptordriver13 4 years ago
More agile? Maybe. Bigger payload? No. Better range? Not a chance. Cheaper? The initial cost is about the same, but the maintenance is where the Super Hornet wins out. The Tomcat was designed as a fleet defence fighter to protect against cruise missiles and bombers. has to have a long ass range, where the Super Hornet does not.
brtshstel 4 years ago 2
FINALLY!!!!!!!!! may be a bit late replying but someone who isn't brainwashed at how "brilliant" the super hornet is when it clearly isnt! im an ex tomcat pilot and i hate people saying how great the hornet is!!
FsxfleetRobertw 2 years ago
LOL! this was amazing with the speakers way up!
squeekyV 4 years ago