Let me be the first to start the Sun Exchange, I want 3 trillion; or you will all fry horribly, I will be willing trade even Steven to get us out of our national debt to End the Fed and free my children.
@Yoetah DoD maybe, elements inside certainly. I've been looking into the royal think tanks like Queen Beatrix's and rockefeller's Club of Rome, bilderberg group, earth summit, maurice strong, they all work together to form our minds a certain way. mainly because they fear overpopulation. and are using the pseudoscience of AGW to shape humanity to murder itself... to save the mothership earth.
Yep the pseudoscience of AGW would "likely fit the bill, The common enemy of humans becomes itself."
@Yoetah they made forecasts based on a limited analysis of solar influence, the last 30 years or so, while the correct analysis of solar activity must necessarily encompass many centuries to be reliable. As you said "questionable correlations". ALL the IPCC analysis that leads to AGW is flawed. They're now starting to say that the next cooling period will be also caused by GW!! How ludicrous.
Yet the solar variation doesn't explain the large global changes in temperatures over the last few decades. Which is the whole point of the matter. For example this very video has a chart comparing temps and solar variation during a time period with relatively consistent co2 and other factors so solar events will have a large effect of course. They stop this chart at 1985 because the correlation breaks down very badly as GHG forcing becomes noticeable.
@garith21 that's why the "warming" has stopped in the last 12 years, despite the constant increase in CO2 emissions? OR maybe it's because the solar activity has reduced dramatically in the last years? Even if you compare cycle 23 with the 22 you'll already see an important decrease. If you pay attention, you'll see that glaciers are growing in both poles... since 2007.
u see if they accept it it will be a death blow to thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, and to the big bang theory in general. so it's not just about economy and co2 trade, bussiness and profits.
The US constitution rightly ASSUMES that Governments cannot be trusted -that's the whole reason for the constitution's existence: to limit the power of Government and to protect the people.
So it should come as no surprise that Government-funded science is designed to allow Governments to assume more power and even to justify it overriding the constitution - which Obama is doing by signing away your liberty to a world government - all in the name of climate change.
Here's a fact: The environment you are in right now contains less than half a percent of CO2. Less than 20% of THAT is man-made. It IS simple math, but then again...
of course they did not want to acknowledge it gets in their way of giving us a global CO2 tax...Its a complete fraud and they want to tax us regardless of it not being our fault... Al Gore is making billions and has people in his pocket.. They will ignore it and I suggest you (Henrik Svensmark) start being very careful in your movements...they will be threatening you im sure,,,Good luck and I hope you find a way forward
A huge ball of fire thousands of times larger than the Earth having an effect on the weather? That's just crazy talk!! I'll take my helping of sarcasm with a bottle of carbonated water please.
Obviously another team need to look into his raw data and peer review his results then publish! May be he is right, may be he is wrong but if most scientists are wrong we need a different Political approach and we need it now.
Climate Science is so politicized now it's like Galileo's experience when he told people the earth wasn't the center of the universe. I'm glad these researchers are finding that there's far more to climate science than CO2. Anthropogenic Global Warming has been hyped past the point of logical belief or explanation.
Whether it is changing the climate or not, if you agreed that the CO2 currently being produced is acceptable, you are a fool. That much CO2 is not a good thing, and it will kill us. Live more responsibly and we will all benefit. The planet isn't going anywhere, the people are the one's leaving.
there has been over 10X more CO2 than there is now. Plants love it and if we want to increase plant yield, for the starving and burdgeoning population, we may want to consider upping the output.
Also, more CO2 is released from the ocean floor than from all human activity.
All I am saying is that excess CO2 and other pollutants are not necessary. We can moderate them, find alternatives, but we don't. The earth and all its lifeforms are adapting to survive to the climate fluctuations.. Humans are not, and frankly, the earth doesn't care if we die off or not. If humans want to continue living, they will have to adapt..
Since you want to lower CO2 then you will then help me out, right?
I know how to get 80% of the co2 out the system. Do you want to donate to my research and development?
If you don't then please do your own research and development, or keep the mouth shut.
Either way, please do not force me to fund my competition via taxes. When Obama gives money ($150 b) to his friends and I get zero, I then am competing with the USA government...or the UN and the world.
CO2 is not a pollutant it is essential to plant life and through various researches into layering of rock and ice formations its been shown that historically there was far far more CO2 in the atmosphere in the past and that CO2 is a product of warming, the issue is so publicised now by the communists trying to create a world government and dominate the globe. All evidence which refutes their theory (theory is all they have) is quelled and public publication such as you-tube is the only way
If you think there is one sole reason for climate change, then you are being foolish. Yes, of course the sun and stars and clouds have an affect, but to rule out completely human's affect is ridiculous. You have to respect every variable of the equation
i never said there was 1 cause, human adaptation? If we are not the most adaptable animal by defnition, i want to know waht animal s mre adptable to change than us.
Continuing down the path, humans are the only species which could probably save the planet.
1. nuclear warheads detonated in series causing a ripple or wave could nudge an asteroid from a collion coarse with earth.
2. Using the sme principle, we could push asteroids with the right material to extend the life of the sun.
OriginalAntiDave, you are an idiot. There is not enough mass of asteroids in the entire solar system to make one hill of beans difference in the life cycle of the sun. Indeed even tossing all of the planets in the solar system into the sun would not impact the life cycle of the sun in any meaningful way. All of the mass of the planets added together is less than 0.2% of the mass of the sun, so clearly asteroids would have less impact than an amoeba on the toe of an elephant.
By your logic, we should kill all beings that produce co2, just like some suggest that we kill all cows because of the Methane production.
Can't you see that MORE co2 is better?
Can't you see that the rocks in the ocean are a buffer and can absorb massive amounts of co2?
Want to live more responsible?
Don't to me... (I don't need your money...I am just making a point). I you want to help and can think...then write me a note...interview...and if you have skills...you can help...
@ seaplaneguy1, I would be happy to donate to your research, only I am an unemployed graduate student with no money. Perhaps when the day comes that I do have an income, I could help you out. Until then I will continue to do what I can with what I have to reduce my own personal emissions. Do you have a website where I can see some of your R&D?
@dave, you are right, I never accused you (dave) of being a fool. Though if you believe that the level of C02 emissions on this planet are acceptable, and that if you believe there is one sole reason for climate change, only then are you thinking foolishly.
Look the UN Panel of Minons, that have the CO2 fakeout from their Masters, the Illuminiati. They run all governmental and political, military, industrial, banking complex.
@junglelord The people that say things like space is electric and run by electricity, not gravity, will not get published and will be received in a negitive manner. So cosmogenic aerosols creating clouds is a death sentence to the evil minion old dead men of the UN Panel on Global Warming, which they switched to Climate Change evil bastards.
Unbelievable that the MSM is ignoring "Climategate". Obama and his minions are doing their best to destroy the United States as the main global power. His actions are treasonous. He needs to fail as president. He needs to fail so our country can succeed.
'Climatic variations' are real. They've been happening all through Earth's history.
'Climate change' , ie, a sudden change caused by our emissions, is NOT real. The climate wasn't settled and constant for centuries and then suddenly changed recently, the way they are trying to make us believe. There have been many variations the last few centuries and things haven't suddenly become worse. There were more, and stronger, hurricanes in the 1940s than there have been recently, for instance.
4:17 I read from his eyes- "F..ck, this guy from Danmark can brake our CO2 teory. What we are going to do with out those millions of tax payers $ !!!!... We must ignore this guy and shut his face up...
What is the song that starts at 7:09? So beautiful and it really made me think about this video and the fact that we might not actually be the sole cause of the climate change. Maybe we are not the reason to the climate change at all.
Let me be the first to start the Sun Exchange, I want 3 trillion; or you will all fry horribly, I will be willing trade even Steven to get us out of our national debt to End the Fed and free my children.
chronicrelatavist 7 months ago
@Yoetah DoD maybe, elements inside certainly. I've been looking into the royal think tanks like Queen Beatrix's and rockefeller's Club of Rome, bilderberg group, earth summit, maurice strong, they all work together to form our minds a certain way. mainly because they fear overpopulation. and are using the pseudoscience of AGW to shape humanity to murder itself... to save the mothership earth.
Yep the pseudoscience of AGW would "likely fit the bill, The common enemy of humans becomes itself."
ParapaDrifter 1 year ago
Comment removed
david222444 1 year ago
@Yoetah they made forecasts based on a limited analysis of solar influence, the last 30 years or so, while the correct analysis of solar activity must necessarily encompass many centuries to be reliable. As you said "questionable correlations". ALL the IPCC analysis that leads to AGW is flawed. They're now starting to say that the next cooling period will be also caused by GW!! How ludicrous.
angelpbj 1 year ago
@Yoetah
Yet the solar variation doesn't explain the large global changes in temperatures over the last few decades. Which is the whole point of the matter. For example this very video has a chart comparing temps and solar variation during a time period with relatively consistent co2 and other factors so solar events will have a large effect of course. They stop this chart at 1985 because the correlation breaks down very badly as GHG forcing becomes noticeable.
garith21 1 year ago
@garith21 that's why the "warming" has stopped in the last 12 years, despite the constant increase in CO2 emissions? OR maybe it's because the solar activity has reduced dramatically in the last years? Even if you compare cycle 23 with the 22 you'll already see an important decrease. If you pay attention, you'll see that glaciers are growing in both poles... since 2007.
angelpbj 1 year ago
u see if they accept it it will be a death blow to thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, and to the big bang theory in general. so it's not just about economy and co2 trade, bussiness and profits.
ActiveStorage 2 years ago 3
@ActiveStorage I agree, the rabbit hole goes down and down...
angelpbj 1 year ago
The US constitution rightly ASSUMES that Governments cannot be trusted -that's the whole reason for the constitution's existence: to limit the power of Government and to protect the people.
So it should come as no surprise that Government-funded science is designed to allow Governments to assume more power and even to justify it overriding the constitution - which Obama is doing by signing away your liberty to a world government - all in the name of climate change.
Welcome to communism, America.
numbskullandy 2 years ago 13
Here's a fact: The environment you are in right now contains less than half a percent of CO2. Less than 20% of THAT is man-made. It IS simple math, but then again...
Lodhizattva 2 years ago
The carbon cult gets too much money and that's what they care about, not science.
1965ace 2 years ago 4
The main problem is a result of
a) religion
b) politician
c) financial institution
all interacting with eachother to take all the power and resource for themselves
tociph 2 years ago 3
I think the main problem could be that "they" can't tax cosmic rays.
hamblin31 2 years ago 20
and now proof if we didn't had these things the world would be a better place, i don't think so.
xzaz2 2 years ago
of course they did not want to acknowledge it gets in their way of giving us a global CO2 tax...Its a complete fraud and they want to tax us regardless of it not being our fault... Al Gore is making billions and has people in his pocket.. They will ignore it and I suggest you (Henrik Svensmark) start being very careful in your movements...they will be threatening you im sure,,,Good luck and I hope you find a way forward
Peace
catchtwenty2ube 2 years ago 5
A huge ball of fire thousands of times larger than the Earth having an effect on the weather? That's just crazy talk!! I'll take my helping of sarcasm with a bottle of carbonated water please.
DiabloLucky13 2 years ago 3
Obviously another team need to look into his raw data and peer review his results then publish! May be he is right, may be he is wrong but if most scientists are wrong we need a different Political approach and we need it now.
ktmcmc 2 years ago 3
Climate Science is so politicized now it's like Galileo's experience when he told people the earth wasn't the center of the universe. I'm glad these researchers are finding that there's far more to climate science than CO2. Anthropogenic Global Warming has been hyped past the point of logical belief or explanation.
Rockyspoon09 2 years ago 6
Whether it is changing the climate or not, if you agreed that the CO2 currently being produced is acceptable, you are a fool. That much CO2 is not a good thing, and it will kill us. Live more responsibly and we will all benefit. The planet isn't going anywhere, the people are the one's leaving.
creed9145 2 years ago
bone head,
there has been over 10X more CO2 than there is now. Plants love it and if we want to increase plant yield, for the starving and burdgeoning population, we may want to consider upping the output.
Also, more CO2 is released from the ocean floor than from all human activity.
OriginalAntiDave 2 years ago
All I am saying is that excess CO2 and other pollutants are not necessary. We can moderate them, find alternatives, but we don't. The earth and all its lifeforms are adapting to survive to the climate fluctuations.. Humans are not, and frankly, the earth doesn't care if we die off or not. If humans want to continue living, they will have to adapt..
creed9145 2 years ago
@creed9145
Since you want to lower CO2 then you will then help me out, right?
I know how to get 80% of the co2 out the system. Do you want to donate to my research and development?
If you don't then please do your own research and development, or keep the mouth shut.
Either way, please do not force me to fund my competition via taxes. When Obama gives money ($150 b) to his friends and I get zero, I then am competing with the USA government...or the UN and the world.
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
CO2 is not a pollutant it is essential to plant life and through various researches into layering of rock and ice formations its been shown that historically there was far far more CO2 in the atmosphere in the past and that CO2 is a product of warming, the issue is so publicised now by the communists trying to create a world government and dominate the globe. All evidence which refutes their theory (theory is all they have) is quelled and public publication such as you-tube is the only way
scottwright666 2 years ago 5
If you think there is one sole reason for climate change, then you are being foolish. Yes, of course the sun and stars and clouds have an affect, but to rule out completely human's affect is ridiculous. You have to respect every variable of the equation
creed9145 2 years ago
omg,
i never said there was 1 cause, human adaptation? If we are not the most adaptable animal by defnition, i want to know waht animal s mre adptable to change than us.
Continuing down the path, humans are the only species which could probably save the planet.
1. nuclear warheads detonated in series causing a ripple or wave could nudge an asteroid from a collion coarse with earth.
2. Using the sme principle, we could push asteroids with the right material to extend the life of the sun.
OriginalAntiDave 2 years ago
OriginalAntiDave, you are an idiot. There is not enough mass of asteroids in the entire solar system to make one hill of beans difference in the life cycle of the sun. Indeed even tossing all of the planets in the solar system into the sun would not impact the life cycle of the sun in any meaningful way. All of the mass of the planets added together is less than 0.2% of the mass of the sun, so clearly asteroids would have less impact than an amoeba on the toe of an elephant.
Samuraiakira2000 2 years ago
@creed9145
By your logic, we should kill all beings that produce co2, just like some suggest that we kill all cows because of the Methane production.
Can't you see that MORE co2 is better?
Can't you see that the rocks in the ocean are a buffer and can absorb massive amounts of co2?
Want to live more responsible?
Don't to me... (I don't need your money...I am just making a point). I you want to help and can think...then write me a note...interview...and if you have skills...you can help...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
how about killing anyone who farts on the grounds that he pollutes the earth?
changewind13 2 years ago
@ seaplaneguy1, I would be happy to donate to your research, only I am an unemployed graduate student with no money. Perhaps when the day comes that I do have an income, I could help you out. Until then I will continue to do what I can with what I have to reduce my own personal emissions. Do you have a website where I can see some of your R&D?
creed9145 2 years ago
@dave, you are right, I never accused you (dave) of being a fool. Though if you believe that the level of C02 emissions on this planet are acceptable, and that if you believe there is one sole reason for climate change, only then are you thinking foolishly.
creed9145 2 years ago
Wow, global warming could possibly be related to that gigantic burning ball of fire in the sky? Madness! *sarcasm*
cathardy10 2 years ago 3
Look the UN Panel of Minons, that have the CO2 fakeout from their Masters, the Illuminiati. They run all governmental and political, military, industrial, banking complex.
junglelord 2 years ago
@junglelord The people that say things like space is electric and run by electricity, not gravity, will not get published and will be received in a negitive manner. So cosmogenic aerosols creating clouds is a death sentence to the evil minion old dead men of the UN Panel on Global Warming, which they switched to Climate Change evil bastards.
junglelord 2 years ago 2
Unbelievable that the MSM is ignoring "Climategate". Obama and his minions are doing their best to destroy the United States as the main global power. His actions are treasonous. He needs to fail as president. He needs to fail so our country can succeed.
producehawk 2 years ago 4
So the climate change is real, but it's not entirely human caused. ?
greymval 2 years ago 7
'Climatic variations' are real. They've been happening all through Earth's history.
'Climate change' , ie, a sudden change caused by our emissions, is NOT real. The climate wasn't settled and constant for centuries and then suddenly changed recently, the way they are trying to make us believe. There have been many variations the last few centuries and things haven't suddenly become worse. There were more, and stronger, hurricanes in the 1940s than there have been recently, for instance.
goss1961 2 years ago 3
Any connection to Chemtrails?
1EcoChick 2 years ago
4:17 I read from his eyes- "F..ck, this guy from Danmark can brake our CO2 teory. What we are going to do with out those millions of tax payers $ !!!!... We must ignore this guy and shut his face up...
Rafal264 2 years ago 5
What is the song that starts at 7:09? So beautiful and it really made me think about this video and the fact that we might not actually be the sole cause of the climate change. Maybe we are not the reason to the climate change at all.
Jansmaaa 2 years ago 4