Billy Meier lie detecter test on ufo photo's and encounters

[BONITOdaHORA]

whats the name of this doc ,please+?

[whales]

thanks for the upload. any idea what the full documentary is called?

[electronicmedium]

looks too fake

[Cayne160]

@electronicmedium You look Fake , Dumb ass. Of Course it Looks Fake . Who's actually used to seeing these type of things on a daily basis? Fukkin Skeptics. You are the typical lost soul that has no idea of the Alien agenda!

[flowerbower]

Lie detector? Oh yeah, that pseudoscientific gadget that the CIA believed in and which failed to detect several extremely dangerous spies within its own organisation! It's a toy, invented by the same person who invented Wonder Woman's magic lariat, haha.

[2009OLP]

@flowerbower Consider the psychological stress analysis done by Michael Arndt in 2007 who is a consultant to the US special forces. He concluded Meier is telling the truth.

[flowerbower]

@2009OLP Is that the same Michael Arndt who said 5 years ago that polygraphs are highly unreliable and that an MRI can be much more accurate?

BTW, everyone seems to forget that Meier has also shown photographs of flying pterodactyls. Are we supposed to believe those as well?

[2009OLP]

@flowerbower The test done in 2007 was not a polygraph test.

[flowerbower]

@2009OLP I did not say that it was. The point is that none of these lie-detecting methods have any scientific validity because a 'lie' is an abstract moral construct. It cannot be 'separated' from the subject as DNA or a fingerprint can. For instance, the subject might have some mental defect which blocks the expected 'normal' response to lie-telling. And the fact remains that Meier has faked flying objects other than saucers. What is one to make of that?

[broooziy]

@flowerbower type in mrmorlam1 he has reproduced the laughable "wedding cake spaceship" model, as for the metal samples that the chemist Marcel Vogel tested , well they just happened to vanish straight after he had them and cannot be tested by independent scientists and are proof of nothing

[broooziy]

@flowerbower as for the former UN diplomat, what is failed to be mentioned is the fact that she was only 8 years old at the time, and obviously very impressionable and hardly a very reliable witness, so slipping in the part about being a a former UN diplomat to try give credibility is just another red herring.

[flowerbower]

@broooziy Thanks for that info. As I always say, we can never (as a society) permit direct democracy (e.g. everyone voting on every issue via their computer) because there are just too many loonies around who do not even begin to understand the concept of valid evidence. Imagine true 'majority rule', when the majority is composed of idiots!

[broooziy]

@flowerbower ooops i missed out the letter r in mrmorlam1, yes agree with what you say....Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence ;))

[2009OLP]

@flowerbower Please provide proof that they were all fake models. Nobody has been able to duplicate his photos to this day. Also the original investigators had models made in 1978 and tested them against meiers photos. It was found by the photo analysis computer that meiers photos were large objects a distance from the camera, while the models the investigators had made were small objects close to the camera in the photos taken. Also explain the metal that a lead scientist, Marcel Vogel examined

[2009OLP]

at IBM labratories. He concluded that he could not reproduce that metal by any known means on this planet. Or how about the former UN diplomat that met Meier when he was traveling in india in 1964 and took photographs there as well of ufos. She saw these ufos and also went through a PSE test (ya, ya not good enough). But consider that a former UN diplomat is testifying to meiers truthfulness after witnessing the events herself. Also it is impossible that Meier faked the 1964

[2009OLP]

Photographs, as he had his money stolen upon arriving in India and also many different people saw the object and the photographs of it. These people include a reporter from the New Delhi Statesman, S. Venkatesh who also produced an article on the subject. This is the foundational evidence to the meier case, which all of the "professional" skeptics (around 20) failed to duplicate in Michael Horns recent challenge. These skeptics include Neil deGrasse Tyson.

[2009OLP]

All of that evidence and proof is only the tip of the iceberg. So if you want to back your claims up, go ahead and try to reproduce his evidence. Until then the fact still stands, that the Meier Case is absolutely true and authentic.