this was a really bad video, the pictures moved too fast =[ and i didn't really get any explination at all out of this video.......please thumbs up or thumbs down if you agree or dissagree with me!
Maybe we should call it a supernatural thing or a Vampire or perhaps an angel oh did I forget the werewolf...ouch, a dead werewolf killed by a Vampire :-)
OH, and if I am going to compare, then give me the fox skull you are using so I can compare it as well to the Montauk Monster. It is the only way to do it scientifically if I am to respond to your suggestions.
Still waiting for your amazing evidence that the Montauk Monsters upper jaw, or "nose bone," as you like to call it, belongs to a fox and does not, "even come close," to that of a raccoon.
Where is this Smithsonian fox skull you have babbled on about that is a match for the Montauk Monster???
this was a really bad video, the pictures moved too fast =[ and i didn't really get any explination at all out of this video.......please thumbs up or thumbs down if you agree or dissagree with me!
xDStunner 2 years ago 2
Let's just call it a dang rabbit and drop it. I don't want to see these pictures anymore, the longer you look at them the uglier they get.
ToryMae 2 years ago
Maybe we should call it a supernatural thing or a Vampire or perhaps an angel oh did I forget the werewolf...ouch, a dead werewolf killed by a Vampire :-)
Have fun
Gaus
Gaus212 2 years ago
a hybrid
mexicankid625 3 years ago
No there is no reason to call it a hybrid sines there are hundreds of normal candidates,just watch "Yj64nqedul0" and you may agree with me
Gaus
Gaus212 2 years ago
usesing the pictuers from this and other videos and having tested dna of this animal i would say that it is undiscribable
applecookies123 3 years ago
Um, your video clearly showed the teeth were only a match between a raccoon and the Montauk Monster, and never a match to a fox..ever.
How did you fail to notice this?
Lagomort 3 years ago
My friend are you incapable of looking at the whole animal or unwilling to do that I don't know...
but since you have been fixated on the lower jaw can you do me a favor and use the same energy to prove the nose bone belongs to a raccoon ...
It don't even come close
Gaus
Gaus212 3 years ago
Show me a "nose bones"
Lagomort 3 years ago
OH, and if I am going to compare, then give me the fox skull you are using so I can compare it as well to the Montauk Monster. It is the only way to do it scientifically if I am to respond to your suggestions.
Lagomort 3 years ago
Still waiting for your amazing evidence that the Montauk Monsters upper jaw, or "nose bone," as you like to call it, belongs to a fox and does not, "even come close," to that of a raccoon.
Where is this Smithsonian fox skull you have babbled on about that is a match for the Montauk Monster???
Lagomort 3 years ago
Hey Lagomort , watch this and tell me what you think
Thanks
"Yj64nqedul0"
Gaus212 2 years ago