The size of the force of gravity tells us how much matter is beneath us. The size of the Earths magetospere tells us how much ferro based materials are moving down there.
To all the haters, im not saying this whole thing is true BUT a long time ago ppl thought the world was flat and reacted the same way as you guys do when they made up the idea of the earth being round, stop hatin and think outside the box...
@666darius666 Um, we learned the Earth wasn't flat because we got better educated on how the Earth works. Just like we learned the Earth isn't hollow. See, the point of learning is we actually KNOW things now. "Thinking outside the box" is saying "Don't be afraid to think idiotic things that fly in the face of mountains of evidence!".
@bbmcrae im seriously doubting this whole thing is real BUT like you said we got better education, in the old days ppl were being teached that the earth was actually flat...
it could be the same thing here with ppl assuming the earth is not hollow while we actually do NOT have proof that it is that way.
@666darius666 You're "doubting" the Earth is hollow? Okay. You do understand that science, through decades of vast research and experimentation across the globe, understands what how the Earth is composed and how it works? So, equating actual science with a crazy Youtube video is ridiculous? I could just as well argue that when you wake up and there's snow outside, that magic dragons brought it. After all, you never saw the snow fall.
@bbmcrae im not saying that, what i ment with that was that i wont be surprised if the earth isnt hollow neither if it is hollow, and also the snow part, what i said was is that it has not been proven yet, snow has been proven to come from clouds as we all know.
@666darius666 I'm saying we DO know this thing. The fact that's we haven't seen the core of the Earth with our own eyes doesn't mean that we don't know, through mountains of research and understanding of how our planet works, whether it's hollow or not. Every single piece of scientific evidence refutes that. To say "we don't know" is untrue. We do know. Google it. Crazy videos are fun to watch, but do your research, my friend.
@666darius666 Here's the second sentence of the Wikipedia article, just to get you started:
"The hypothesis has been shown to be wrong by observational evidence, as well as by the modern understanding of planet formation; the scientific community has dismissed the notion since at least the late 18th century."
I'm all for new ideas and re-thinking old concepts. But willful ignorance and insanity have no place at the party, you know?
@666darius666 If you compare the level of education to the level of our technological advancements, our educational system (globally) sucks. The entire system, from being a little kid untill you're first (after graduation) job, is a big FAIL. What do you get when schools and prisons are owned by private companies instead of ''the people''. Profit. How do you get profit, by cutting expenses. Seriously, the global educational system is a big f*ck-up and very outdated for this time.
@cavello89 The system is set-up for wealthy people to sustain thier grip on society, by overcharging necessities so that they are practically only affordable for the elite class, or the ''higher half of the middle class''. I'm from Holland myself, a very wealthy country, but I learned English from tv and games, and never even got the option to go to college.
@cavello89 There's so much money involved into it, I never thought my parents would be able to pay for it. Didn't even cross my mind as a teenager that it really was an option, or if it was, that it was worth all the trouble of my parents grabbing their last pennies and draining their bankaccounts.
@666darius666 google the greek god (titan?) Atlas. even the ancient greeks knew the earth was round. the idea of the earth being flat was total bullshit being taught in elementary school.
As you may or may not know: stars run on nuclear fusion, it requires immense pressure and heat. This "inner sun" would be waaaay too small to have enough pressure on it's core to get a nuclear fusion reaction. learn some basic physics and smoke less weed, you're ideas may seem cool when you're high, but you should realise that they're kinda stupid when you're sober..
If the inner human species are so advanced, why don't they drill to the outer surface and explore space aswell with satellites and probes? 6:13 of FAIL right here.
@Jenoer Even IF there is a far more advanced human species beneath us they will probably have different techniques, as for satellites : You saw the world was inverted so they would probably have their sattelites in the sky too. (we wouldnt send a sattelite down a giant hole into the earth either now would we?)
@666darius666 Why would you send satelites/probes to 'explore' if you can see the other side of the world and simply take a boat, airplane or a walk there..
If you are inside a closed box you would want to take a peak outside, even 'we' do it, by sending probes as far as we can to see whats out there..
And no we havent sent satelites down into the earth, however we sent probes and scanned under the surface with satelites and other various tools.
@SirS666 Why would they believe this? They won't even believe the real stuff because their book say different. This is not in the bible, so a cristian won't believe it. Maybee if it was much hotter, like a hell :)
cant fault the graphics.. smooth, and near flawless ( earth model could be higher res ) but the subject matter. what utter nonsense! if he's so sure about this, take a months wage, book passage on a fishing boat and go visit the north pole... i eagerly await his video from the molten core of our planet :)
lovely work. beautifully presented. its great to open peoples minds a little bit. people get so arrogant and certain on this earth.....but an open mind is a beautiful thing. salute!
This video is the most retarded thing ever, I'm going to need 2 gallons of brain bleach. "5th dimension"? Really? The captions aren't even spelled correctly! This is so unscientific I'm suprised anyone actually believes this.
Great job with the video. I at least am open to the possibilities. As others have stated, if you don't have an open mind and an imagination, you'll never discover new things.
If the Earth is a dydon sphere how the hell has the supposed small sun managed to reach enough mass to keep fusion stable? Not only that with earth quakes volcanoes and the forces of tidal breaking the thin shell would have been ripped apart. And one more thing explain how the gravity would work as it is the weakest force that again builds with mass if the earth is hollow how can this be achieved?
the earth still cannot be a dyson sphere because of the materials that we find in the crust. If the earth were a dyson sphere we would find an abundance of space frames where we are currently drilling for oil and there would not be any magma. there would also be a abundance of rare earth metals and less oil and less magma
You make mention of a seismic 'shadow' in the video, but that's from 1970's data. Modern data has been able to sort out all the layers that made that data fuzzy. A real "shadow" would be an absense of data, not chaotic or unclear readings. A void would come up as a void, no seismic waves would pass through it at all.
Also there is no 'interference' patterns at the poles. The poles are the poles, they're the same as any other part of the spherical planet.
Nope, not a chance. The structure of the planet is solid and even its densities are known. We know where and when an earthquake happens, so one can calculate the speed of seismic waves as it passes through the planet by measuring when seismic waves arrive at distant locations. If there were a void anywhere in the center, it would be identified as such, because seismic waves wouldn't pass through it, it would appear as a shadow of sorts. There's no void inside the Earth.
wow, boy does it is amazing planet we live in this video I just saw really surprised me for its content, if you know English you'll like veil and you will surprise you to enjoy
Oh God. Where to begin... 1) Earthquakes bounce off layers in the earth just like sound waves in undersea thermals.The Earth nor the Sea need be hollow to explains this. 2) An inner sun would be too small to generate fusion. If made of gas, it would simply be a bit denser at the center. If made of molten metal, it would quickly develop a crust. 3) Such a complex and unstable system would very quickly rip itself apart, due to the gravitational tug of the Moon. ( Cool video, though, nice work ! )
@SystemError51 Agreed, with all those grammatical and spelling errors in the video, combined with sensationalist paranoid bullshit about church, CIA and the "illuminati", all this technobabble is comedy.
Real science doesn't have to be presented with an introduction that "it's supported by many researchers" - it would already have been given funding by governments and major corporations.
This video is a pristine example of techniques used by snake-oil salesmen. Utter bullshit.
This would be so sweet if it were true, but I think it isn't. I don't think having a one endless day would be good, I like to be in the dark sometimes.
@GilaTomster Humans are what create those problems.Time to except it and fight it.
What an idiot you are man.So you think we're like cattle or something? Grow up! If they can travel here they can also replicate food without hurting anyone. Have you ever heard of nanotechnology?It's a little something civilisations tend to discover before FTL space travel.
a clink in the earth/dyson sphere model would be radiation from the center sun. How would the 'inner earth layer' be protected from it. Also stars no matter the size have a strong gravity effect. Dyson sphere's in general theory are to capture 100% of the energy of that star it's encompassing.
And if a race built this dyson sphere why haven't they built more, it is an interesting theory, but modern physics couldn't explain this. And planes do fly over the north pole. ;)
a sphere cannot have a stable athmosphere on its inside, because it would collapse into its center due to gravitation.
a "sun" inside the earth cannot exist because its mass would be too small to prevent itself from collapsing, too small to even form something like a sun.
@melmec False, gravity can also be created by motion ( example : if you ever have been in a rollercoaster etc.) Second of all , we ASSUME a sun that size is impossible purely because we have never seen it, seeing all the magnetic fields its fairly possible (just think of plasma fusion power plants wich is basically getting power from a tiny sun with the use of powerfull magnetic fields)
@amannvig As opposed to throwing around words like 'dimensions' and 'vibrations' whithout giving a second thought (or even a first thought) to what they actually MEAN? Believe me, I'm well versed in the laws of physics and I can tell you without a doubt that nothing in this video is true.
@scuzzulus I'm starting a physics degree this autumn :) I know about gauss' law for gravity because my high school physics teacher told me about it, but it wasn't on the course.
This strikes me as less "this is a reasonable theory which explains empirical observations" and more "we made up some shit you can't disprove". Well, we can kinda disprove it, but I imagine you'd put your fingers squarely in your ears if we tried.
If there were no star inside the Earth in this model, anything on the inner surface would be weightless (Gauss's Law). Adding the star makes everything fall into the star. You can go ahead and contest Newton's law of gravity too, but I think you'll come up rather short.
To those who are looking for what the song is called, once you find the original video [which this Youtube user stole] you'll find a direct mention of the song title and artist.
It has no sence for me. Tell me if im wrong, but magnetic field should go throught the sun which have it;s own field, couse in new science sun is a kind of blackhole too, which have same kind of magnetic field. It can't be left withouth any so we must say, that earth have second magnetic field as a flying stone in dysonsphere theory. Maybe I'm wrong or not well informed, but that's my point of view.
weird thing, i watched this video muted, while listing to "M4 part 2"(the song played for ending credits in the game Mass Effect), and it matched PERFECTLY, with the animations in this video, no joke, PERFECTLY! it was probably one of those "once in a life-time" things, i paused and rewound at certain points to read some of the text, but kept the music running, and because of that, some how they even ended at the same time! try listing to that song with the vid, it works very well
Interesting video only question is how would this affect the inner Earth's gravity? Given the mass of star in the center as well as the mass of the other size of the inner sphere, wouldn't the objects be pulled towards the center. There isn't very much mass "beneath" you to keep you fixed on the inner shell.
@keviichann nah there is no mass in the core of this theory (besides the little sun) , i assume the crust would be heavier than the inward sun and would hence keep us on the ground
"We assume our planet exists basically in two parallel dimensions."
Well shit, how can I argue with that logic? Actually I can argue with that very easily, using my theory that the Earth is in fact a slice of bacon. First, we assume that our planet is bacon. Next we assume that it has length of approximately 5 times its width, resembling a slice of bacon. Why doesn't the illuminati accept my BaconEarth theory? Because THEY want the bacon for themselves. Also, my bacon is the 6TH DIMENSION
Holy shit, nice animation. And very convincing. I could almost believe that you were a stupid, insane conspiracy theorist. But no one that dumb would have these animation skills.
I love this theory. And while by 'modern' science it may seem flawed, if we look PAST current science (as lets face it science is always historically wrong and updated) into a post-modern perspective this theory is really quite interesting. I'll be reading more up on it. Fantastic vid btw, even if the spelling and grammar are a little off. Any ideas what the song is called/who it's by?
This had literally no evidence of anything and was full of grammar errors. Though a wonderful and fantastic idea, it makes no sense. A hollow structure the size of the Earth and with an inward gravitational pull (why we don't float off the spherical surface) would collapse in on itself because of the immense weight. The same problem a Dyson Sphere would face.
This had literally no evidence of anything and was full of grammar errors. Though a wonderful and fantastic idea, it makes no sense. A hollow structure the size of the Earth and with an inward gravitational pull (why we don't float off the spherical surface) would collapse in on itself because of the immense weight.
second if there was a star at the center of the earth wouldn't it heat the inner surface evenly? and if it did then how could Antarctica be a giant ice plug why wouldn't it melt?
third...gravity? the water doesn't fall straight into the star because why? id like to know about this miracle gravity that repels everything on the inside of the sphere and attracts everything on the outside. please id like to know more..
"t stands to reason that there is a strong possibility that when a star goes supernova, and it collapses on itself, that it can form a planetoid type body that has water on it...."
Jeez man, just take a look at the basic physics of a supernova, there is no way that the aftermath would leave a planet covered in water. Physics just doesn`t allow it, not even if you massively jig the numbers. Use you brain. Actually use it. Apply the scientific method to all thought. this is a ridiculous video
@OmegaDude22 - IMO, we still don't understand, fully, how the life and death of suns work in all of their intimate details. There could be more factors than we realize that determine what happens and why....this is why I posted this.... Science's track record is a long series of corrected assumptions, so more things are possible than we previously thought.....again, IMO...
I believe that our Earth may be the product of a sun that went supernova, several billion years ago. Water is the by product of burnt hydrogen...in other words water is nothing more than the ashes of suns or stars burning it all up. It stands to reason that there is a strong possibility that when a star goes supernova, and it collapses on itself, that it can form a planetoid type body that has water on it....
@jasquatch Whay? But nuclear fusion of hydrogen produces helium, a completely different process from buring it. And stars don't go supernova until they run out of hydrogen and anything else it can fuse.
@jasquatch we are all but star dust. The conservation of matter by Einstien "Matter can neither be created nor destroyed but only changed". When a Star goes Super Nova it implodes on itself and creates a black hole and many Nutrino Particles which are passing through the Earth as I write. Your theory is very flawed. Planetoids are created by matter that get's pulled into a gravitational rotation attracting more and more matter..like comets, asteroids ect. This process taking billions of years.
The accepted concept is that Planetoids are created by gravitational forces caused by rotational patterns around a Sun. It can start from a very small object and collect more space debri and matter until a planet is created. However a Super Nova implodes on itself creating a Black Hole. What exists on the other side of that black hole could be a planetary system. It's meer speculation at present. However Earth being the result of a SuperNova is very unlikely unless proven otherwise.
@jasquatch I believe you are delusional. Are you an Alex Jones/David Icke junkie? This is a very interesting, well-produced video (other than the typo-ridden superimposed subtitles), though. Where'd you find it?
@jasquatch@jasquatch you know the sun doesn't actually burn hydrogen in that sense? it is far too hot and hasn't enough oxygen. Any water molecules which formed in the sun would be immediately ripped apart by the temperatures. The sun 'burns' hydrogen in its nuclear fire to helium, then lithium, etc. No water is produced until the sun dies and sheds its outer layers; as they cool, water can form, but there is no solid 'shell' of ground for it to fall onto, as you seem to suggest.
@jasquatch Materials from wich the earth formed were indeed once part of stars.Humans and every other species on the earth were formed out of materials that were formed in and spread out by supernovas.So infact we are made of stardust.
When stars collapse they do not form planetoids though.They form either a white dwarf,a neutron star or a black hole depending on their mass.
You showed that you have no understanding what a scientific theory is. The theory of General Relativity is just a "theory" that describes gravity and how the mass distorts the fabric of space time. They can measure how, and how much the light can bend of a star, so they know exactly their gravitational pull. This HAS to match Earth's mass.If General Relativity is wrong (and in this case not by a small factor), everything from satellites, rockets, GPS, will fail miserably.
This is nonsensical for several reasons.Some are the gravitational pull that is necessary to keep the earth around the sun , the moon, keep magnetic fields without a magnetic iron core, no enough mass to make a inner sun shine, no way to keep the climate stable, no observed data to match your hypothesis ...and so on.
I agree that it appears nonsensical to a mind that was classically trained by institutions that want you to believe in their agendas. Many of the cutting edge sciences are blowing the old paradigms out of the water. Their is plenty of evidence, not proof, just like evolution, creationism, intelligent design and intervention are all still theories, not proof, but evidence to support that all celestial bodies have a hollow core to all of the them. Many credible books have been written about it.
@jasquatch Ok, if you think gravity is...some attraction...then how do oyu think earth formed? if matter has pulling power it would form a solid sphere, not a hollow one. Of course satelites are not alowed in poles, imagine a few hundred satelites all crossing at single two points, that would be cathastrophic. of course they all have their altitude, but thats not that relevant, as there is an altitudal zone in which they.orbit.
@jasquatch How would Richard C. Hoagland's hyperdimensional physics model fit into your idea on how stellar systems, their satellites and all work... how do they orbit? I fully agree that our educational institutions and mass media only program us to view things in 3 dimensions and make us believe that nothing exists outside of the small range that we can percieve with our 3 dimensional senses...
@nixdorfbrazil What if Gravity doesn't exist, and was just magnetism? What if the Sun wasn't hot, and was just pure energy? What if the Earths Atmospheric elements created an internal heat blanket under the Atmosphere due to the Sun's pure energy colliding with, and through them? What if the Sun revolved around the Earth like our moon? What if we were thrown off Earth like projectiles because the Earth is spinning on an axis right? What if 1+1 Dimensional Earth Became the 4th Dimension? WHAT IF!
that was an awesome video. I have a question. is it really illegal to fly over the north and south poles? I tried to look up info on this online, but found very ambiguous information. can anyone confirm this or clarify? that being said, if earth is a living organism (gaia theory), then it would have to have something pulsating inside of it, like a heart or energy center, wouldn't it? not just dead dirt and rock.
@Metrukuta occam's razor is not a rule to debunk the paranormal and everything alternative. occam never meant it to be. it's the pseudoskeptics that use it that way. visit SCEPCOP at DebunkingSkeptics dot c o m and read the treatise.
The Hollow Earth theory is purely scientific therefore I can and will use Occam's Razor to debunk this. In order for Earth to be hollow like this video claims, our current, and working, knowledge about planet formation and gravity itself would have to be completely rethought. So, what is the simplest explanation? That our current and, like I said before, WORKING knowledge is correct, or that we have to rethink everything we know about physics for this theory to even work?
Comment removed
tonlap 2 days ago
disregard physics acquire tinfoilheadwear.
Madhijz 6 days ago 4
Interesting, imagining a heaven where most people believe a hell would be. Pretty cool, despite most of the video being bullshit.
mrchillin157 1 week ago
Ik vond het boek beter!
wtp1981 1 week ago
Look what the age of computer-animation and modern agnosticism brought to us...
sroodhorst 1 week ago
correction magnetosphere
2 / 10
please see me
LJK1111 1 week ago 3
The size of the force of gravity tells us how much matter is beneath us. The size of the Earths magetospere tells us how much ferro based materials are moving down there.
Nice animations,
3 / 10
must try harder!
LJK1111 1 week ago
This is true!
In 1711. Not at any point after we, you know, learned stuff about how the Earth works. But, please, enjoy the madness. It makes for fun sci-fi.
bbmcrae 1 week ago
Woow what a good animation. I like how it's represent the hollow earth model
sharavsambuu 1 week ago
good music
MrAapenkind 1 week ago
To all the haters, im not saying this whole thing is true BUT a long time ago ppl thought the world was flat and reacted the same way as you guys do when they made up the idea of the earth being round, stop hatin and think outside the box...
666darius666 1 week ago 2
@666darius666 Um, we learned the Earth wasn't flat because we got better educated on how the Earth works. Just like we learned the Earth isn't hollow. See, the point of learning is we actually KNOW things now. "Thinking outside the box" is saying "Don't be afraid to think idiotic things that fly in the face of mountains of evidence!".
bbmcrae 1 week ago
@bbmcrae im seriously doubting this whole thing is real BUT like you said we got better education, in the old days ppl were being teached that the earth was actually flat...
it could be the same thing here with ppl assuming the earth is not hollow while we actually do NOT have proof that it is that way.
666darius666 1 week ago
@666darius666 You're "doubting" the Earth is hollow? Okay. You do understand that science, through decades of vast research and experimentation across the globe, understands what how the Earth is composed and how it works? So, equating actual science with a crazy Youtube video is ridiculous? I could just as well argue that when you wake up and there's snow outside, that magic dragons brought it. After all, you never saw the snow fall.
bbmcrae 1 week ago
@bbmcrae im not saying that, what i ment with that was that i wont be surprised if the earth isnt hollow neither if it is hollow, and also the snow part, what i said was is that it has not been proven yet, snow has been proven to come from clouds as we all know.
we simply do not know this thing YET.
666darius666 1 week ago
@666darius666 I'm saying we DO know this thing. The fact that's we haven't seen the core of the Earth with our own eyes doesn't mean that we don't know, through mountains of research and understanding of how our planet works, whether it's hollow or not. Every single piece of scientific evidence refutes that. To say "we don't know" is untrue. We do know. Google it. Crazy videos are fun to watch, but do your research, my friend.
bbmcrae 1 week ago
Comment removed
bbmcrae 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@666darius666 Here's the second sentence of the Wikipedia article, just to get you started:
"The hypothesis has been shown to be wrong by observational evidence, as well as by the modern understanding of planet formation; the scientific community has dismissed the notion since at least the late 18th century."
I'm all for new ideas and re-thinking old concepts. But willful ignorance and insanity have no place at the party, you know?
bbmcrae 1 week ago
@666darius666 If you compare the level of education to the level of our technological advancements, our educational system (globally) sucks. The entire system, from being a little kid untill you're first (after graduation) job, is a big FAIL. What do you get when schools and prisons are owned by private companies instead of ''the people''. Profit. How do you get profit, by cutting expenses. Seriously, the global educational system is a big f*ck-up and very outdated for this time.
cavello89 1 week ago
@cavello89 The system is set-up for wealthy people to sustain thier grip on society, by overcharging necessities so that they are practically only affordable for the elite class, or the ''higher half of the middle class''. I'm from Holland myself, a very wealthy country, but I learned English from tv and games, and never even got the option to go to college.
cavello89 1 week ago
@cavello89 There's so much money involved into it, I never thought my parents would be able to pay for it. Didn't even cross my mind as a teenager that it really was an option, or if it was, that it was worth all the trouble of my parents grabbing their last pennies and draining their bankaccounts.
cavello89 1 week ago
@666darius666 google the greek god (titan?) Atlas. even the ancient greeks knew the earth was round. the idea of the earth being flat was total bullshit being taught in elementary school.
ManylulzwithMurder 1 day ago
Middle-Earth... Tolkien was right!
MrHardstylefucker 1 week ago 3
As you may or may not know: stars run on nuclear fusion, it requires immense pressure and heat. This "inner sun" would be waaaay too small to have enough pressure on it's core to get a nuclear fusion reaction. learn some basic physics and smoke less weed, you're ideas may seem cool when you're high, but you should realise that they're kinda stupid when you're sober..
mosseljaan 1 week ago
Nice fairytale
BeBwoy 1 week ago
you should check your spelling B
PlatypusPizza 1 week ago
Why this video sucks:
- "Illuminati and church are keeping this secret" << someone made that up
- "If we assume the earth has two dimensions..." << then its true?!??
- "You need a open mind, conception and spiritual abilities" << believe in shit that isn't true
- "Truth" << actually means bullshit
and then i knew the rest of the video was 100% bullshit.
KennYA51 1 week ago 3
damn dude got to be a bad smoke huh ?
TVD1able 1 week ago
If the inner human species are so advanced, why don't they drill to the outer surface and explore space aswell with satellites and probes? 6:13 of FAIL right here.
Jenoer 1 week ago
@Jenoer Even IF there is a far more advanced human species beneath us they will probably have different techniques, as for satellites : You saw the world was inverted so they would probably have their sattelites in the sky too. (we wouldnt send a sattelite down a giant hole into the earth either now would we?)
666darius666 1 week ago
@666darius666 Why would you send satelites/probes to 'explore' if you can see the other side of the world and simply take a boat, airplane or a walk there..
If you are inside a closed box you would want to take a peak outside, even 'we' do it, by sending probes as far as we can to see whats out there..
And no we havent sent satelites down into the earth, however we sent probes and scanned under the surface with satelites and other various tools.
Jenoer 1 week ago
6 minutes and 13 minutes of fucking bullshit
GenraalBouman 1 week ago 14
@GenraalBouman lmao....thumbs up for you sir!!
hongpingmike 6 days ago
What Music is this?
Avigoorn 1 week ago
There will be plenty of christians and islamics to believe this shit.
SirS666 1 week ago
@SirS666 Why would they believe this? They won't even believe the real stuff because their book say different. This is not in the bible, so a cristian won't believe it. Maybee if it was much hotter, like a hell :)
snatermans 1 week ago
cant fault the graphics.. smooth, and near flawless ( earth model could be higher res ) but the subject matter. what utter nonsense! if he's so sure about this, take a months wage, book passage on a fishing boat and go visit the north pole... i eagerly await his video from the molten core of our planet :)
SystemParanoia 2 weeks ago
Video poster.. you are an idiot!
SystemParanoia 2 weeks ago
@SystemParanoia that "idiot " sure knows how to use 3d, video and music editing software like a pro must be a different kind of idiot
makebake 2 weeks ago
you idiot.. please go castrate yourself so as not to contaminate future humankind with your 'dumb-ass' genes.
pfah4216 2 weeks ago
utter utter rubbish
Alunism 2 weeks ago
I won't subscribe to this theory, but I still think it's a bloody funny thought :D
Adharkach 2 weeks ago
are you retarded?
PacoDeOrozco 2 weeks ago
lovely work. beautifully presented. its great to open peoples minds a little bit. people get so arrogant and certain on this earth.....but an open mind is a beautiful thing. salute!
johnnystarrysky 3 weeks ago
bunch of idiots
JRvonP 3 weeks ago
cool video bro :)
beckdude5 1 month ago
Two parallel dimension? No, i beleive we exist in three dimensions - Up, side, and width. Oh, and time may count as a 4th dimension is some models.
TehOrkyMan 1 month ago
This video is the most retarded thing ever, I'm going to need 2 gallons of brain bleach. "5th dimension"? Really? The captions aren't even spelled correctly! This is so unscientific I'm suprised anyone actually believes this.
zhoufood 1 month ago
Great job with the video. I at least am open to the possibilities. As others have stated, if you don't have an open mind and an imagination, you'll never discover new things.
saqsay1 1 month ago
Someone actually believes this crap? rofl
SonDudu2 1 month ago
Major phantom mask illusion moment at 1:30
TheZythe 1 month ago
To paraphrase the great Wolfgang Pauli, this video isn't even wrong.
BlankVellum 1 month ago
Anyway Nice tune ;)
ricochetlaugh 2 months ago
If the Earth is a dydon sphere how the hell has the supposed small sun managed to reach enough mass to keep fusion stable? Not only that with earth quakes volcanoes and the forces of tidal breaking the thin shell would have been ripped apart. And one more thing explain how the gravity would work as it is the weakest force that again builds with mass if the earth is hollow how can this be achieved?
baileysnape 2 months ago
Also, can we just fucking duke it out Halo style?
pm2981988 2 months ago
This is fucking stupid.
pm2981988 2 months ago
the earth still cannot be a dyson sphere because of the materials that we find in the crust. If the earth were a dyson sphere we would find an abundance of space frames where we are currently drilling for oil and there would not be any magma. there would also be a abundance of rare earth metals and less oil and less magma
inventor121 2 months ago
GODDAMIT!! I was looking for the Sci-Fi version of a dyson sphere, not this hollow earth shit.
Please change the title of this video
Bos187 2 months ago 20
Three theories that could possibly exist if this is true.
1. One this would be a spectacular theory of a natural dyson sphere.
2. How is the star so small being able to heat the inside without killing anything?
3. What if this planet was manufactured?
TheDeadpoolZone 2 months ago
So where is the Dyson Sphere?
akibmatf 2 months ago
This is disinformation from the NWO.
rfwelsh 2 months ago
AND THE A HORSE BATMAN.
OntDinRS 2 months ago
You make mention of a seismic 'shadow' in the video, but that's from 1970's data. Modern data has been able to sort out all the layers that made that data fuzzy. A real "shadow" would be an absense of data, not chaotic or unclear readings. A void would come up as a void, no seismic waves would pass through it at all.
Also there is no 'interference' patterns at the poles. The poles are the poles, they're the same as any other part of the spherical planet.
ikan0uchuujin 3 months ago
Nope, not a chance. The structure of the planet is solid and even its densities are known. We know where and when an earthquake happens, so one can calculate the speed of seismic waves as it passes through the planet by measuring when seismic waves arrive at distant locations. If there were a void anywhere in the center, it would be identified as such, because seismic waves wouldn't pass through it, it would appear as a shadow of sorts. There's no void inside the Earth.
ikan0uchuujin 3 months ago
wow, boy does it is amazing planet we live in this video I just saw really surprised me for its content, if you know English you'll like veil and you will surprise you to enjoy
xazavu 3 months ago
Oh God. Where to begin... 1) Earthquakes bounce off layers in the earth just like sound waves in undersea thermals.The Earth nor the Sea need be hollow to explains this. 2) An inner sun would be too small to generate fusion. If made of gas, it would simply be a bit denser at the center. If made of molten metal, it would quickly develop a crust. 3) Such a complex and unstable system would very quickly rip itself apart, due to the gravitational tug of the Moon. ( Cool video, though, nice work ! )
chialeux514 3 months ago
A simple test: DRILL. Science can prove anything that is natural. Earth is a solid rock, AKA the most probable explanation.
Whosthatmiscreant 3 months ago
Incredible graphics and interesting imaginative ideas.
sydfan526 3 months ago
This would make such cool premise for a SciFi story
Bizzer10 3 months ago
molto factibile ma ancho molti puti
woloabel 3 months ago
idk but whats this song i havent paid attention to the video just jamming
Dperez07 3 months ago
But a smaller sun in a hollow Earth would make it implode, even a small sun woule
ikton50009 3 months ago
For the sake of humanity, I can only hope that this is some form of school project where you have to create some awesome looking visuals.
If however you are serious, then I guess I don't want to live on (or in! haha) this planet anymore.
SystemError51 3 months ago
@SystemError51 Agreed, with all those grammatical and spelling errors in the video, combined with sensationalist paranoid bullshit about church, CIA and the "illuminati", all this technobabble is comedy.
Real science doesn't have to be presented with an introduction that "it's supported by many researchers" - it would already have been given funding by governments and major corporations.
This video is a pristine example of techniques used by snake-oil salesmen. Utter bullshit.
evilcatpillow 3 months ago
Wow. No science. None whatsoever. What a dip.
googy2ne 3 months ago
Dude... If you could use this kind of graphic design skill to talk about REAL things, there'd be more interest in science overall.
j6k4m8 3 months ago
So why isn't there light shining out of the poles?
Oscy 4 months ago
Great visuals! Please go the scientists and offer your talent to help them produce such stunning visuals of actual science theories.
DracaOxians 4 months ago
Wow, this crack pot actually took the time to make a pretty cool video.
unfortunately this person couldn't explain the ground he stands on if his life depended on it.
Nexstarcrazyness 4 months ago
this is such pseudoscience
irishdude69 4 months ago
Terrible assumption after terrible assumption. Absolutely no evidence. I have to say though, nice graphics.
TorchonFire 4 months ago
This would be so sweet if it were true, but I think it isn't. I don't think having a one endless day would be good, I like to be in the dark sometimes.
mcz1945 4 months ago
If anyone actually believes this, then humanity is doomed.
danman2125 4 months ago
@GilaTomster Humans are what create those problems.Time to except it and fight it.
What an idiot you are man.So you think we're like cattle or something? Grow up! If they can travel here they can also replicate food without hurting anyone. Have you ever heard of nanotechnology?It's a little something civilisations tend to discover before FTL space travel.
TheBlackIdentety 5 months ago
NICE TUNE
ricochetlaugh 5 months ago
maybe GRAVITY has a conscious and is purposely doing what we observe in this universe?
quest33613 5 months ago
hmm interesting, for those who call this bullshit, then you guys don't have imagination lols
Enoa7 6 months ago
I'm looking forward for those Dyson sphere earths.
Do you think the abyss would then be the halfway between the outer and the inner waters ?
zabuzato 6 months ago
Music: Robert Burian - Recovery
Anarfabeztia 7 months ago
What software did you use to make this?
ArchCivis 7 months ago
You might have discovered the actual shape of the Hollow Earth (a spiritual dimension not visible to us) but the fields are.
Google: The Hollow Earth reality explained
why is there? what is it? where it came from?
-Hollow Earth has something to do with the Poles Shifting.
Foundation360 7 months ago
You are an idiot.
OpethNation 7 months ago
a clink in the earth/dyson sphere model would be radiation from the center sun. How would the 'inner earth layer' be protected from it. Also stars no matter the size have a strong gravity effect. Dyson sphere's in general theory are to capture 100% of the energy of that star it's encompassing.
And if a race built this dyson sphere why haven't they built more, it is an interesting theory, but modern physics couldn't explain this. And planes do fly over the north pole. ;)
gateen22 7 months ago
UM CAN SOMEONE SAY PERPETUAL MOTION PLEASE?
vladyyt 7 months ago
>>Let's see what these two dimensions would look like if we could see them booth
>>would look like if we could see them booth
>>see them booth
>>booth
noahevans 7 months ago
clearly a troll canibal at work
fdr100100 7 months ago
BRB, have to go disconnect all the joints on a corpse, otherwise Issac Newton will just keep rolling around in his grave.
thebrowneyedgirl97 8 months ago
Google: "Sun, planets made of different stuff" July 02, 2011
cmsahe 8 months ago
this is physically not possible.
a sphere cannot have a stable athmosphere on its inside, because it would collapse into its center due to gravitation.
a "sun" inside the earth cannot exist because its mass would be too small to prevent itself from collapsing, too small to even form something like a sun.
melmec 8 months ago 18
@melmec oh on the contrary Procyon's companion is smaller than the earth
silentassassin9 2 months ago
@silentassassin9 put Procyon inside the Earth and see what happens ;-)
Its gravitation would collapse the earth.
melmec 2 months ago
@melmec 0
Dre4dnought 1 month ago
@melmec False, gravity can also be created by motion ( example : if you ever have been in a rollercoaster etc.) Second of all , we ASSUME a sun that size is impossible purely because we have never seen it, seeing all the magnetic fields its fairly possible (just think of plasma fusion power plants wich is basically getting power from a tiny sun with the use of powerfull magnetic fields)
666darius666 1 week ago
@amannvig As opposed to throwing around words like 'dimensions' and 'vibrations' whithout giving a second thought (or even a first thought) to what they actually MEAN? Believe me, I'm well versed in the laws of physics and I can tell you without a doubt that nothing in this video is true.
Metrukuta 8 months ago
@93tomb o rly? what class do you learn that in? (i'm just starting physics this fall)
scuzzulus 8 months ago
@scuzzulus I'm starting a physics degree this autumn :) I know about gauss' law for gravity because my high school physics teacher told me about it, but it wasn't on the course.
93tomb 8 months ago
This strikes me as less "this is a reasonable theory which explains empirical observations" and more "we made up some shit you can't disprove". Well, we can kinda disprove it, but I imagine you'd put your fingers squarely in your ears if we tried.
93tomb 8 months ago
If there were no star inside the Earth in this model, anything on the inner surface would be weightless (Gauss's Law). Adding the star makes everything fall into the star. You can go ahead and contest Newton's law of gravity too, but I think you'll come up rather short.
AbuseTeamRobot 8 months ago
To those who are looking for what the song is called, once you find the original video [which this Youtube user stole] you'll find a direct mention of the song title and artist.
setherial666 8 months ago
It has no sence for me. Tell me if im wrong, but magnetic field should go throught the sun which have it;s own field, couse in new science sun is a kind of blackhole too, which have same kind of magnetic field. It can't be left withouth any so we must say, that earth have second magnetic field as a flying stone in dysonsphere theory. Maybe I'm wrong or not well informed, but that's my point of view.
CrispiJones 8 months ago
weird thing, i watched this video muted, while listing to "M4 part 2"(the song played for ending credits in the game Mass Effect), and it matched PERFECTLY, with the animations in this video, no joke, PERFECTLY! it was probably one of those "once in a life-time" things, i paused and rewound at certain points to read some of the text, but kept the music running, and because of that, some how they even ended at the same time! try listing to that song with the vid, it works very well
Rocleod211 8 months ago
So if the earth were hollow, and the core was a star - it would be day time inside the earth, all day erry day?
alienfast 9 months ago
Interesting video only question is how would this affect the inner Earth's gravity? Given the mass of star in the center as well as the mass of the other size of the inner sphere, wouldn't the objects be pulled towards the center. There isn't very much mass "beneath" you to keep you fixed on the inner shell.
eeroth42 9 months ago
@eeroth42 In fact, the gravity from the shell you'd stand on would exactly cancel itself out, more or less, so you'd fall into the star.
93tomb 8 months ago
EARTH IS SPINNING IN WRONG DIRECTION ! GOP IN CONTROL ?
kn9ioutom 9 months ago
we should tunnel down and steal their oil, if they have any.
scuzzulus 9 months ago
Could you make the words a little smaller I could almost read them!
jonscott7 9 months ago
cool ass visuals and music
cmonutube 9 months ago 2
are you retarded?
TotalGameMaster 9 months ago
lol conspiracy theorist you so crazy(literally, you're fucking batshit insane seek help)
soffa93 9 months ago
Theoretical wouldnt an inward earth be impossible since matter would fall into the core. We would practicly fall into the sun.
keviichann 9 months ago
@keviichann nah there is no mass in the core of this theory (besides the little sun) , i assume the crust would be heavier than the inward sun and would hence keep us on the ground
scuzzulus 9 months ago
this is fucking hilarious - it's a bit clump of rock, bro, not a bloody illuminati conspiracy
LegolessVideos 9 months ago
How can earthquakes travel from one side to the other if there's a big empty vacuum in the middle?
9hello123 9 months ago
"We assume our planet exists basically in two parallel dimensions."
Well shit, how can I argue with that logic? Actually I can argue with that very easily, using my theory that the Earth is in fact a slice of bacon. First, we assume that our planet is bacon. Next we assume that it has length of approximately 5 times its width, resembling a slice of bacon. Why doesn't the illuminati accept my BaconEarth theory? Because THEY want the bacon for themselves. Also, my bacon is the 6TH DIMENSION
Fiwer1st 10 months ago 2
Holy shit, nice animation. And very convincing. I could almost believe that you were a stupid, insane conspiracy theorist. But no one that dumb would have these animation skills.
DontMockMySmock 10 months ago
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.
bagtaggar 10 months ago
Nice visualizations, but this is so dumb.
presbarkeep 10 months ago 17
@presbarkeep Ah, but what IF..life was right under our noses...and WE'RE the aberrations........ fuck it... no ಠ__ಠ
imarkglass 3 months ago
I love this theory. And while by 'modern' science it may seem flawed, if we look PAST current science (as lets face it science is always historically wrong and updated) into a post-modern perspective this theory is really quite interesting. I'll be reading more up on it. Fantastic vid btw, even if the spelling and grammar are a little off. Any ideas what the song is called/who it's by?
lhowardpask 10 months ago
Nice graphics.
Fake and gay theory.
nadoeloiskat 10 months ago
This had literally no evidence of anything and was full of grammar errors. Though a wonderful and fantastic idea, it makes no sense. A hollow structure the size of the Earth and with an inward gravitational pull (why we don't float off the spherical surface) would collapse in on itself because of the immense weight. The same problem a Dyson Sphere would face.
swarm420 11 months ago
This had literally no evidence of anything and was full of grammar errors. Though a wonderful and fantastic idea, it makes no sense. A hollow structure the size of the Earth and with an inward gravitational pull (why we don't float off the spherical surface) would collapse in on itself because of the immense weight.
swarm420 11 months ago
Earth is hollow! Kraken awaits inside! lolol. What a moronic delusion this theory is!
Marsnet 11 months ago
*snif* *snif*..wait..is that...BULLSHIT????
ASWE323 11 months ago
Lmaoshmsfoaidmt
you cant be serious... really?
first off what is holding it open?
second if there was a star at the center of the earth wouldn't it heat the inner surface evenly? and if it did then how could Antarctica be a giant ice plug why wouldn't it melt?
third...gravity? the water doesn't fall straight into the star because why? id like to know about this miracle gravity that repels everything on the inside of the sphere and attracts everything on the outside. please id like to know more..
deathknight51 11 months ago
Comment removed
deathknight51 11 months ago
"t stands to reason that there is a strong possibility that when a star goes supernova, and it collapses on itself, that it can form a planetoid type body that has water on it...."
Jeez man, just take a look at the basic physics of a supernova, there is no way that the aftermath would leave a planet covered in water. Physics just doesn`t allow it, not even if you massively jig the numbers. Use you brain. Actually use it. Apply the scientific method to all thought. this is a ridiculous video
SingularityMedia 1 year ago
Flashy graphics, but you can't even call these wild assertions a theory.
ElevenDestinys 1 year ago
Professor. LAVA. HOT!
AllYourPie 1 year ago
@OmegaDude22 - IMO, we still don't understand, fully, how the life and death of suns work in all of their intimate details. There could be more factors than we realize that determine what happens and why....this is why I posted this.... Science's track record is a long series of corrected assumptions, so more things are possible than we previously thought.....again, IMO...
jasquatch 1 year ago
I believe that our Earth may be the product of a sun that went supernova, several billion years ago. Water is the by product of burnt hydrogen...in other words water is nothing more than the ashes of suns or stars burning it all up. It stands to reason that there is a strong possibility that when a star goes supernova, and it collapses on itself, that it can form a planetoid type body that has water on it....
jasquatch 1 year ago
@jasquatch Whay? But nuclear fusion of hydrogen produces helium, a completely different process from buring it. And stars don't go supernova until they run out of hydrogen and anything else it can fuse.
Cool music btw :P
OmegaDude22 1 year ago
@jasquatch we are all but star dust. The conservation of matter by Einstien "Matter can neither be created nor destroyed but only changed". When a Star goes Super Nova it implodes on itself and creates a black hole and many Nutrino Particles which are passing through the Earth as I write. Your theory is very flawed. Planetoids are created by matter that get's pulled into a gravitational rotation attracting more and more matter..like comets, asteroids ect. This process taking billions of years.
vitalsenise 1 year ago
@vitalsenise
Look at the physics.
Not all supernova result in a black hole. Few in fact. Neutron stars are probably a more common product.
Look up the Chandrasekhar limit.
SingularityMedia 1 year ago
The accepted concept is that Planetoids are created by gravitational forces caused by rotational patterns around a Sun. It can start from a very small object and collect more space debri and matter until a planet is created. However a Super Nova implodes on itself creating a Black Hole. What exists on the other side of that black hole could be a planetary system. It's meer speculation at present. However Earth being the result of a SuperNova is very unlikely unless proven otherwise.
vitalsenise 1 year ago
@jasquatch I believe you are delusional. Are you an Alex Jones/David Icke junkie? This is a very interesting, well-produced video (other than the typo-ridden superimposed subtitles), though. Where'd you find it?
Aphradonis 11 months ago
@jasquatch @jasquatch you know the sun doesn't actually burn hydrogen in that sense? it is far too hot and hasn't enough oxygen. Any water molecules which formed in the sun would be immediately ripped apart by the temperatures. The sun 'burns' hydrogen in its nuclear fire to helium, then lithium, etc. No water is produced until the sun dies and sheds its outer layers; as they cool, water can form, but there is no solid 'shell' of ground for it to fall onto, as you seem to suggest.
93tomb 8 months ago
@jasquatch Materials from wich the earth formed were indeed once part of stars.Humans and every other species on the earth were formed out of materials that were formed in and spread out by supernovas.So infact we are made of stardust.
When stars collapse they do not form planetoids though.They form either a white dwarf,a neutron star or a black hole depending on their mass.
TheBlackIdentety 5 months ago
you are high. SCIENCE DOES NOT EQUAL SCIENCE FICTION
mkronck 1 year ago
Are you more interested in a shit throwing fest or a conversation of possibilities?
jasquatch 1 year ago
You showed that you have no understanding what a scientific theory is. The theory of General Relativity is just a "theory" that describes gravity and how the mass distorts the fabric of space time. They can measure how, and how much the light can bend of a star, so they know exactly their gravitational pull. This HAS to match Earth's mass.If General Relativity is wrong (and in this case not by a small factor), everything from satellites, rockets, GPS, will fail miserably.
nixdorfbrazil 1 year ago
This is nonsensical for several reasons.Some are the gravitational pull that is necessary to keep the earth around the sun , the moon, keep magnetic fields without a magnetic iron core, no enough mass to make a inner sun shine, no way to keep the climate stable, no observed data to match your hypothesis ...and so on.
nixdorfbrazil 1 year ago 7
I agree that it appears nonsensical to a mind that was classically trained by institutions that want you to believe in their agendas. Many of the cutting edge sciences are blowing the old paradigms out of the water. Their is plenty of evidence, not proof, just like evolution, creationism, intelligent design and intervention are all still theories, not proof, but evidence to support that all celestial bodies have a hollow core to all of the them. Many credible books have been written about it.
jasquatch 1 year ago
@jasquatch Ok, if you think gravity is...some attraction...then how do oyu think earth formed? if matter has pulling power it would form a solid sphere, not a hollow one. Of course satelites are not alowed in poles, imagine a few hundred satelites all crossing at single two points, that would be cathastrophic. of course they all have their altitude, but thats not that relevant, as there is an altitudal zone in which they.orbit.
the87jazels 1 year ago
@jasquatch How would Richard C. Hoagland's hyperdimensional physics model fit into your idea on how stellar systems, their satellites and all work... how do they orbit? I fully agree that our educational institutions and mass media only program us to view things in 3 dimensions and make us believe that nothing exists outside of the small range that we can percieve with our 3 dimensional senses...
iroquoisfalls 7 months ago
@jasquatch Great troll! People actually think you're serious! My hat's off to you.
acr08807 5 months ago
@nixdorfbrazil What if Gravity doesn't exist, and was just magnetism? What if the Sun wasn't hot, and was just pure energy? What if the Earths Atmospheric elements created an internal heat blanket under the Atmosphere due to the Sun's pure energy colliding with, and through them? What if the Sun revolved around the Earth like our moon? What if we were thrown off Earth like projectiles because the Earth is spinning on an axis right? What if 1+1 Dimensional Earth Became the 4th Dimension? WHAT IF!
drebogotti49 7 months ago
Category:
Entertainment
bierhumpen01 1 year ago 35
that was an awesome video. I have a question. is it really illegal to fly over the north and south poles? I tried to look up info on this online, but found very ambiguous information. can anyone confirm this or clarify? that being said, if earth is a living organism (gaia theory), then it would have to have something pulsating inside of it, like a heart or energy center, wouldn't it? not just dead dirt and rock.
GlobalDating 1 year ago
Beautiful animation.
comedycartoons 1 year ago
Hi, I'd like you to meet my friend, Occam's Razor.
Oh, what's that, Occam's Razor? This is complete bullshit? Well, if you say so!
=)
Metrukuta 1 year ago 39
@Metrukuta occam's razor is not a rule to debunk the paranormal and everything alternative. occam never meant it to be. it's the pseudoskeptics that use it that way. visit SCEPCOP at DebunkingSkeptics dot c o m and read the treatise.
GlobalDating 1 year ago
@GlobalDating
The Hollow Earth theory is purely scientific therefore I can and will use Occam's Razor to debunk this. In order for Earth to be hollow like this video claims, our current, and working, knowledge about planet formation and gravity itself would have to be completely rethought. So, what is the simplest explanation? That our current and, like I said before, WORKING knowledge is correct, or that we have to rethink everything we know about physics for this theory to even work?
Metrukuta 1 year ago
Hey man,,,
I need 2 read a lot about some things,, that 5th dimension,,, I just don´t visualize ur final thesis,,,
but this is a major league work,, I love it
EarthquakeMachine 1 year ago