@Jozehkmz how do you put an integrated gpu to intel's cpu.The integrated gpu radeon HD 3200 is made for AMD's architecture while intel uses a different one.
disculpame pero no estoy d acuerdo contigo, tu puedes tener la mejor tarjeta de video que si tu prosesador es malo vas a estar jugando a la velocidad de el nivel 1 de tetrix. :D ... no es menos sierto que en este video exajeraron con el grafico, poco prosesador no quiere decir malos graficos.
mmm?? pues clarisimo esta que la comparacion que hace AMD aquie es mas que pura basura!!!= El acelerador Grafico ATI compaado con el Chipset intel ovio es mayor en 3d con ATI pero!!! consume un 25% myor de energia Ahora si ponemos!! Ahora a comparar un Procesador el que sea Pro adicional una tarjeta ATI o Nvidia con la cantidad misma en Memoria si los comparamos se va a ver igual AMD siempre se la saca con los graficos pero jamaz menciona algo de performance NUevo xD v los nuevos a 32 NM d intel
AMD a mi entender es mejor q intel Mi turion no me da la misma potensia ke un athlon pero recuerda q un athlon esta hecho para PC y no para laptop lo mismo pasa con intel algunos chipest estan hechos para PC y otros para laptops los de PC son mas rapidos pero consumen mas energia Yo tengo un turion x2 ultra 64 con la targeta graphica de ATI en un monitor de 17" Mi bateria no podria ser mejor la verdad Me dura de + d 2 horas jugando juegos como Warcraft y Battlefield 2. Ahora comparalo con intel
right i got a turion x2 ultra 64, with ATI radeon graphics and it couldnt be better, my graphics are great and my batery life is awsom, compared to my old laptop which had an intel 2 duo core. lol and my current laptop actually has a bigger screan.
keep in mind. an amd based notebook with standard ati graphics, may be a bad comparison when looking at the graphics card. BUT the intel one is twice as expensive~ with GMA graphics.
The Core 2 Duo spanks the Turion X2 Ultra but he Radeon 3200 IGP spanks EVERY Intel IGP by a huge margin. Now, what's more important: a faster CPU or a faster graphics chipset. For nearly everyone, it's a faster graphics chipset. (Any Core 2 Duo (even CULVs!) and Turion X2 Ultra will be fast enough for most nearly anyone's needs, including YouTube HD content. What separates the men from the boys is the graphics processor.)
u cant compare x3100 with the ati hd 3200 thats stupid ... like comparing ps2 with ps3 ... i have a turion 64 x1 with radon x1100 and my GF have the intel of this video and mi x1100 owns a lot ...i mean if the ati x1100 beats the x3100 ... u cant compare with hd 3100 ... :S
AMD processors are a lot faster, and they don't overheat. My dad used AMD processors since '95, the AMD processors are 100°C cooler than Intel, even without thermal paste. we have 2 laptops that have Intel, and every program runs slower than a snail, and the laptops overheat, and shutdown due to overheating issues. My dad always trust AMD processors, and 3/5 of the computers in my house have AMD processors, such as Athlon XP 1700+ Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+ & 4400+, no lags, no fuss.
This is not the amd is faster than intel. This video shows that only the graphics integrated video showdown and surely the amd wins because it has a nvndia nforce chipset or ati chipset unlike intel has only an intel or S3 unichrome graphics series. But if the amd and intel have the same graphics videocard then the intel surely wins. noob video....
intel core 2 duo is usually faster than turion.. but most AMDs come with better GPUs if you buy them assembled.. i customized a laptop tho with an Intel core 2 duo T9600 with a radeon HD4650.. works incredible with a customed LED 1080p glare screen
This is NOT a good comparison of processors. If you want a FAIR comparison you need to use the same GPU! Everyone knows the integrated Intel GPU is CRAP. A laptop that comes with ATI or NVidia GPUs are going to perform (decent) for games. My personal bias is ATI, but AMD laptops are not the only ones that come with ATI or NVidia GPUs! I bet you my A355-S6943 will blow both of these away :)) Keep in mind, if you are going to compare 1 aspect (processor), *ALL* others MUST BE SAME (RAM,GPU ETC)!!!
For sure... but it compares the whole platform, not only the CPU. AMD wins, cause it has a good CPU, great GPUs and own chipsets^^ That's why amd bought ati. To win the fight with intel. AMD RULEZ ^^ It always had the best technologies, and they had it ALWAYS first! for example?? First 1ghz Cpu? AMD, First, True 64 bit 2 core Cpu? AMD, Who will produce cpu in 22 Nm technology? Well not intel first...
hi! ive done my reasearch dude im getting a notebook w this configuration amd turion x2 w ati 3200 and the cheapest laptop w this hardware is the gateway dont remember the model but it costs like 570 dlls so i dont like the brand but what can i do im poor lol and i want that hardware on my next notebook!
There are a limited number of labtops with Duo processors and Nvidia chipsets. Most of the Duo notebooks have Intels garbage graphics card, so reinserting the comparison. Yes it is a far general comparsion. Overall. Reason why not many notebooks were made with Nvidia chipsets and Duo processors is to keep the price high for those notebooks.
you got to sacrifice something for the price, this could be balance, ex: an core2 duo with1.8 ghz and ati hd 3450 would have been a better comparison, the 1.8 intel core 2 duo = amd dual core 2.4
IBM XT computers from 1980-1985, when Microsoft & IBM partnered up, and MSFT made the MS-DOS for the IBM machines & Windows 1.01, and OS/2 as well, supported up to 4.5MHz, 640KB RAM, 20MB HDD, 5 1/4" Floppy
Here is the truth, take away the integrated video cards, and the Intel core 2 duo outperforms amd turion in every possible way, runs cooler, and saves battery life. Now, lets turn to integrated graphics, you are comparing a new integrated ATI to intels old x3100 platform. X3100 is being phased out, and this is not a true comparision. I'm sorry but for now, intel still wins
They are both intergrated and both use system memory, look up the HP6735s IGP HD 3200 graphics. the HD 3200 is the king of intergrated, do ur research before u come bashing te video :)
Maybe it's not fair to compare them but it was very useful for me. Now I know if it's worth to buy the notebook I'm looking at, he HD 3200 will make a nice change and since I'm no big gamer I do not need an even stronger GPU. Thanx for the video! :)
not a fair comparison, the intel didnt have a dedicated graphics card like that on the AMD setup. how can you compare cpu's on a graphics test when the job is 50% down to the graphics card...and the amd setup is using a more capable graphics card, give both systems the same graphics card, the same RAM, and then you can compare cpu's.
at the moment your not comparing the cpu's at all as both systems are equipped clearly very differently.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
why the fuck am i stupid, its not hard to get 2 graphics cards the same or of similar spec and the same ram you dumb fuck, here you are comparing cpu speed alone but if one graphics card is clearly better then how is it a fair test??
so shut the fuck up with ya crap and go fuck yaself dick face
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
NO THE INTEL SETUP IS INTEGRATED! the ATI card is dedicated, this means the intel card is soldered onto the chipset and the ATI card isnt, its dedicated and the system does not use the graphics memory to run.
who said you must have the same spec, anything with very close spec would be a good comparison you fuckin nob.
everybody knows a dedicated graphics card will out perform an integrated card you prick so why is it stupid to suggest maybe both having dedicated graphics would be fairer, since when was the graphics power down to just the cpu's??
crap I gave this retarded idiotic bastard a thumbs up before reading his flipping second paragraph. Please forgive me for me hastiness :'( someone please thumb it down for me
this video is no comparison u have the ultra dual core 2.1ghz cpu and a core 2 duo 2.1z on top of that u have a shitty video card on an intel put a better one in (geforce) or any other and see the boost in performance
you can see that only a Fast CPU dosnt count much if the IGP sucks
given the fact the AMD M780G / HD3200 has a UVD decoder so it can decode Blu-Ray smooth and correctly
Intel IGPs cant run many games, why no driver support!, AMD's IGPs can run many games why? it uses same driver base as Discrete Radeon HD cards like HD 4000/3000/2000 Series
the AMD M780G / HD 3200 core is based on a HD 2400 discrete core so ;)
bigjoe87865...you're a moron. Both laptops have integrated graphics. This video shows how BAD the Intel graphics are compared to AMD/ATI new integrated graphics (the HD3200 IGP). This is a HUGE step for AMD since it will pull almost everyone on a budget to buy AMD based laptop.
Gma sucks no 3D capabilities
allofyousuckla 10 months ago
turion!
torontoraps8 11 months ago
no...no...no... you CAN'T COMPARE A AMD PROCESSOR (w/ HD3200) with a INTEL CENTRINO CORE 2 DUO (w/ intel gma X3100)
in that case, the AMD will always the winner in fps
but if you put the HD3200 in the Centrino Core 2 Duo you will have a better pc with a good gaming...
Jozehkmz 1 year ago
@Jozehkmz how do you put an integrated gpu to intel's cpu.The integrated gpu radeon HD 3200 is made for AMD's architecture while intel uses a different one.
pieflyNERD 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jozehkmz No you will not.
SOF006 8 months ago
aTİ 3200 integrated .! Onboard
BrowningARMS 1 year ago
OK, put an hd3200 ok centrino core duo 2.1. youll get about 35 fps.
aureliocertified 1 year ago
intel core 2 duo & ATI mobility HD 4500 is the best combination for a gaming laptop. GMA is good to...to wipe ur ass.
gandalfwiz20007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amd Phenom II x4
or
Intel core i7??
amdorintel.ucoz.com
mixa1996 1 year ago
NOT FAIR! Intel GMA are no good for gaming but ATI are good for gaming. You should do C2D+3200/TX2+3200?
BedfordMarcus 1 year ago
@BedfordMarcus its fair,both of them are integrated gpu
spartand001 1 year ago
@BedfordMarcus Trust me, intel would still suck; they don't have related architecture, intel doesn't have 3DNow
Emmanuyael 1 year ago
@Emmanuyael Intel still has EESE4.1 which is similar to 3DNow. No fanboy stuff, I use AMD
chrischoy9 5 months ago
......per gli appassionati intel.....
MrChanakkale 1 year ago
....dedicato a tutti i felici possessori in processori intel.......
MrChanakkale 1 year ago
fuck AMD ownz!!
RE4E 1 year ago
anyone knows the title of the game? It looks cool
dan15ph 1 year ago
i have amd turion 2x2 2.20Ghz
ati radeon hd 3650 1gb shared mem
512 dedicated mem do you think i could run mass efect 2 ? cuse i completed bioshock 2 in high ?
miri2po2 1 year ago
Hey I have a gateway nv5331u does anybody think I could run mass effect 2 on it
kickapoo75 1 year ago
@kickapoo75 i have the same but radeon 4570 ... mass effect 2 30+ but sometimes get fps down under 15-20 ... and bio 2 on high ... without shadows
Manthy485 1 year ago
my new dv6 has amd turion 2x and ati hd 4650 good enuf i quess :)
muuhhaahhh 2 years ago
yup i hv the same laptop
nine9live5 2 years ago
what are these game name?
syazmie97 2 years ago
este video es caca!! solamente comparamos las tarjetas de video y no el procesador
starscream0169 2 years ago
disculpame pero no estoy d acuerdo contigo, tu puedes tener la mejor tarjeta de video que si tu prosesador es malo vas a estar jugando a la velocidad de el nivel 1 de tetrix. :D ... no es menos sierto que en este video exajeraron con el grafico, poco prosesador no quiere decir malos graficos.
lokilindo 2 years ago
mmm?? pues clarisimo esta que la comparacion que hace AMD aquie es mas que pura basura!!!= El acelerador Grafico ATI compaado con el Chipset intel ovio es mayor en 3d con ATI pero!!! consume un 25% myor de energia Ahora si ponemos!! Ahora a comparar un Procesador el que sea Pro adicional una tarjeta ATI o Nvidia con la cantidad misma en Memoria si los comparamos se va a ver igual AMD siempre se la saca con los graficos pero jamaz menciona algo de performance NUevo xD v los nuevos a 32 NM d intel
starscream0169 2 years ago
AMD a mi entender es mejor q intel Mi turion no me da la misma potensia ke un athlon pero recuerda q un athlon esta hecho para PC y no para laptop lo mismo pasa con intel algunos chipest estan hechos para PC y otros para laptops los de PC son mas rapidos pero consumen mas energia Yo tengo un turion x2 ultra 64 con la targeta graphica de ATI en un monitor de 17" Mi bateria no podria ser mejor la verdad Me dura de + d 2 horas jugando juegos como Warcraft y Battlefield 2. Ahora comparalo con intel
lokilindo 2 years ago
What about Turion X2 Ultra and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530?
izgil82 2 years ago
right i got a turion x2 ultra 64, with ATI radeon graphics and it couldnt be better, my graphics are great and my batery life is awsom, compared to my old laptop which had an intel 2 duo core. lol and my current laptop actually has a bigger screan.
lokilindo 2 years ago
That's not fair.....!!!
gunkde21 2 years ago
Why??both on Integrated graphics, mobile cpus with the same speed...what is not being fair??
marcogugo 2 years ago 2
how about intel with gtx 280m vs amd with 3200, haha amd will fck up
seonjie 2 years ago
we are talking about notebooks not PCs, couse if we where to compare PCs whhat will intel do against an AMD Athlon 64 x2 dual core, or an ultra?
lokilindo 2 years ago
AMD/ATI Best Fucking team
AxLZ1 2 years ago 19
This video should have title " GMA vs Radeon 3200"
robsons6 2 years ago
A computer is as fast as its slowest component.
func0il 2 years ago 2
...that's very true, never noticed it that way.
CaptainOmar 2 years ago
keep in mind. an amd based notebook with standard ati graphics, may be a bad comparison when looking at the graphics card. BUT the intel one is twice as expensive~ with GMA graphics.
Hidezepickle 2 years ago
AMD proccsessor just beats everything.
QUproductions 2 years ago
amd is for gaming that's why it's better ;)
Spectr0n 2 years ago
The Core 2 Duo spanks the Turion X2 Ultra but he Radeon 3200 IGP spanks EVERY Intel IGP by a huge margin. Now, what's more important: a faster CPU or a faster graphics chipset. For nearly everyone, it's a faster graphics chipset. (Any Core 2 Duo (even CULVs!) and Turion X2 Ultra will be fast enough for most nearly anyone's needs, including YouTube HD content. What separates the men from the boys is the graphics processor.)
nortexoid 2 years ago
u cant compare x3100 with the ati hd 3200 thats stupid ... like comparing ps2 with ps3 ... i have a turion 64 x1 with radon x1100 and my GF have the intel of this video and mi x1100 owns a lot ...i mean if the ati x1100 beats the x3100 ... u cant compare with hd 3100 ... :S
nojita 2 years ago
actually you have to comapre like that now.
ATI graphics are now the integrated graphics for AMD.
btw my tx2500 has the exact same specs as the AMD computer in the video
tiezep 2 years ago
of course amd is always better tha intel lol
TACA520 2 years ago 2
lol, yeah, unless you benchmark ANY desktop or mobile processor....
WarrenMI48091 2 years ago
AMD processors are a lot faster, and they don't overheat. My dad used AMD processors since '95, the AMD processors are 100°C cooler than Intel, even without thermal paste. we have 2 laptops that have Intel, and every program runs slower than a snail, and the laptops overheat, and shutdown due to overheating issues. My dad always trust AMD processors, and 3/5 of the computers in my house have AMD processors, such as Athlon XP 1700+ Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+ & 4400+, no lags, no fuss.
WinVistaUser2 2 years ago 2
Um........ yea.... Most CPUs don't go past 65c IF you want them to live.
You my friend are not too savvy on the tech.
dregothic 2 years ago
Sinappi
Hakkapettikka
Fuck finland
peterinfamilyguy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not the amd is faster than intel. This video shows that only the graphics integrated video showdown and surely the amd wins because it has a nvndia nforce chipset or ati chipset unlike intel has only an intel or S3 unichrome graphics series. But if the amd and intel have the same graphics videocard then the intel surely wins. noob video....
robertthehacker12 2 years ago
robertthehacker12 stfu look that´s true /watch?v=20PyFNoG2aA Nvidia vs. intel
StevensiTX 2 years ago
Guess what?
AMD owns ATi now.
So STFU for the ones saying AMD wins because of ATi.
SolarianStrike 2 years ago
Comment removed
robertthehacker12 2 years ago
Why don't you see a video where an intel cpu survives and an amd goes up in smoke.
an65001 2 years ago
Should I get a AMD Turion x2 or Intel Core 2 Duo processor for a laptop?
SpitfireN34 2 years ago
intel core 2 duo is usually faster than turion.. but most AMDs come with better GPUs if you buy them assembled.. i customized a laptop tho with an Intel core 2 duo T9600 with a radeon HD4650.. works incredible with a customed LED 1080p glare screen
xlaelx 2 years ago 2
This is NOT a good comparison of processors. If you want a FAIR comparison you need to use the same GPU! Everyone knows the integrated Intel GPU is CRAP. A laptop that comes with ATI or NVidia GPUs are going to perform (decent) for games. My personal bias is ATI, but AMD laptops are not the only ones that come with ATI or NVidia GPUs! I bet you my A355-S6943 will blow both of these away :)) Keep in mind, if you are going to compare 1 aspect (processor), *ALL* others MUST BE SAME (RAM,GPU ETC)!!!
bykelife 2 years ago 2
plenty of Intel laptops come with ATI or NVIDIA graphics
sleepyj327 2 years ago
dont forget, these 2 gfx cards are similar in pricing. maybe thats why they were compared
Abz90L 2 years ago
For sure... but it compares the whole platform, not only the CPU. AMD wins, cause it has a good CPU, great GPUs and own chipsets^^ That's why amd bought ati. To win the fight with intel. AMD RULEZ ^^ It always had the best technologies, and they had it ALWAYS first! for example?? First 1ghz Cpu? AMD, First, True 64 bit 2 core Cpu? AMD, Who will produce cpu in 22 Nm technology? Well not intel first...
yukaszz 2 years ago 4
AMD the best ,intel SUCKs
elrumberito 2 years ago
hi! ive done my reasearch dude im getting a notebook w this configuration amd turion x2 w ati 3200 and the cheapest laptop w this hardware is the gateway dont remember the model but it costs like 570 dlls so i dont like the brand but what can i do im poor lol and i want that hardware on my next notebook!
javimx6 2 years ago
not always , intel cpu crap too sometimes
sonofliberty08 2 years ago
Celeron Only and Semporns for AMD
chrischoy9 2 years ago
There are a limited number of labtops with Duo processors and Nvidia chipsets. Most of the Duo notebooks have Intels garbage graphics card, so reinserting the comparison. Yes it is a far general comparsion. Overall. Reason why not many notebooks were made with Nvidia chipsets and Duo processors is to keep the price high for those notebooks.
Again Yes this is a great comparison
emuguy2003 2 years ago
yeah yeah thats true
Intel forever thats fucking wrong comparasion
5TuNeR5 2 years ago
yeah but, these two laptops would of been about the same price. if you wanted a nvidia integrated card, you would have to pay at least a 100£ extra
Abz90L 2 years ago
you got to sacrifice something for the price, this could be balance, ex: an core2 duo with1.8 ghz and ati hd 3450 would have been a better comparison, the 1.8 intel core 2 duo = amd dual core 2.4
gandalfwiz20007 2 years ago
is this a good processer
AMD Turion 64 X2 mobile technology RM-74 / 2.2 MHz
zexion65 2 years ago
lol 2.2Mhz?
fabianz03 2 years ago
lol WTF 2.2Mhz thats processor from ice age xDxD
5TuNeR5 2 years ago
its 2.1 Ghz not 2.2Mhz
and where you have seen processor from 2.2Mhz???
they doesnt exist
SutkasFan 2 years ago
IBM XT computers from 1980-1985, when Microsoft & IBM partnered up, and MSFT made the MS-DOS for the IBM machines & Windows 1.01, and OS/2 as well, supported up to 4.5MHz, 640KB RAM, 20MB HDD, 5 1/4" Floppy
WinVistaUser2 2 years ago
4.5 MHz ???
thats a murder
104.5 MHz its a frequency of a radio station
SutkasFan 2 years ago
Here is the truth, take away the integrated video cards, and the Intel core 2 duo outperforms amd turion in every possible way, runs cooler, and saves battery life. Now, lets turn to integrated graphics, you are comparing a new integrated ATI to intels old x3100 platform. X3100 is being phased out, and this is not a true comparision. I'm sorry but for now, intel still wins
sanjose21ca 2 years ago
nb platfrom "puma" in my land so expensive...
HP PAVILION TX2531AU - 1184 $
but
BenQ S42 (P8600+9600GT ) - 1040 $
- -a
GrianInW 2 years ago
They are both intergrated and both use system memory, look up the HP6735s IGP HD 3200 graphics. the HD 3200 is the king of intergrated, do ur research before u come bashing te video :)
rocky2237 3 years ago
huh you are a verrry big sucker
i mean u compare an ati radeon with a simple video card lol u are craaazy
xXMouadXx 3 years ago
INTEL en ese caso utiliza chipset, mientras que AMD utiliza una targeta grafica (GPU)
Es estupida la comparacion... ._.
crawcc 3 years ago
amd utiliza la grafica integrada(hd3200) igual que intel(gma x3100), si no sabes mejor no comentes
luiggiibanez 3 years ago 2
Orale felicidades ...
Ojala nadie se esquivocara alguna vez en su vida ...
No lo crees ??
crawcc 3 years ago
AMD RULEZ
druidkg 3 years ago 2
I Thinks This Is more of a gpu bound comparison and we all know about intels integrated graphics -_-
certifiedgmane 3 years ago
i agree, i'm a AMD fan, but i have to say thats completely graphics related... ati(amd) graphics FTW! xD lol
bear2180 3 years ago
hd 3200 it isnt a dedicated gpu its integrated like the 3100
anche360 3 years ago 2
Maybe it's not fair to compare them but it was very useful for me. Now I know if it's worth to buy the notebook I'm looking at, he HD 3200 will make a nice change and since I'm no big gamer I do not need an even stronger GPU. Thanx for the video! :)
Taru58 3 years ago
u cant compare those too!!
one has intergrated one has dedicated.
niggasoffdablock 3 years ago
hd3200 is a igp (shared ram) like the gma3100... it has no dedicated memory
RockMarius 3 years ago 2
memory doesnt matter. the chipset matters
you could have 80 gigs ddr3 put a pentium 2 in there and it will shit itself.
the3200 is a dedicated GPU doesnt matter the ram
niggasoffdablock 3 years ago
Love AMD
Bodraw333 3 years ago 2
not a fair comparison, the intel didnt have a dedicated graphics card like that on the AMD setup. how can you compare cpu's on a graphics test when the job is 50% down to the graphics card...and the amd setup is using a more capable graphics card, give both systems the same graphics card, the same RAM, and then you can compare cpu's.
at the moment your not comparing the cpu's at all as both systems are equipped clearly very differently.
jinx20001 3 years ago
You're fucking stupid
Amebixfan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why the fuck am i stupid, its not hard to get 2 graphics cards the same or of similar spec and the same ram you dumb fuck, here you are comparing cpu speed alone but if one graphics card is clearly better then how is it a fair test??
so shut the fuck up with ya crap and go fuck yaself dick face
jinx20001 3 years ago
It's fair because they're both INTEGRATED GRAPHICS, and the AMD platform costs SIGNIFICANTLY LESS.
Get that through your head
Amebixfan 3 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NO THE INTEL SETUP IS INTEGRATED! the ATI card is dedicated, this means the intel card is soldered onto the chipset and the ATI card isnt, its dedicated and the system does not use the graphics memory to run.
jinx20001 3 years ago
HD3200 is IGP... idiot. Don't deserve to use CAPS LOCK KEY, YOU SON OF A 7@990+!!!!!!!!
googlifi 3 years ago 3
what do u mean by caps lock key? applicable only to intel?
rapps143 2 years ago
stupid. its impposible to equip both systems with the same spec.
mellovicious 3 years ago
who said you must have the same spec, anything with very close spec would be a good comparison you fuckin nob.
everybody knows a dedicated graphics card will out perform an integrated card you prick so why is it stupid to suggest maybe both having dedicated graphics would be fairer, since when was the graphics power down to just the cpu's??
jinx20001 3 years ago
lol are you retarded, the radeon 3200 is right on the turion mobile chipset, as is the X3100 is on the intel chipset
Amebixfan 3 years ago 3
crap I gave this retarded idiotic bastard a thumbs up before reading his flipping second paragraph. Please forgive me for me hastiness :'( someone please thumb it down for me
googlifi 3 years ago
Got to say I go Intell based PC and trust me if you plan to buy something i highly recommend AMD !!!!
enirhpenipe 3 years ago
this video is no comparison u have the ultra dual core 2.1ghz cpu and a core 2 duo 2.1z on top of that u have a shitty video card on an intel put a better one in (geforce) or any other and see the boost in performance
kenllll 3 years ago
well this is a correct comparison
AMD 2.1ghz CPU+IGP vs Intel 2.1ghz CPU+IGP
you can see that only a Fast CPU dosnt count much if the IGP sucks
given the fact the AMD M780G / HD3200 has a UVD decoder so it can decode Blu-Ray smooth and correctly
Intel IGPs cant run many games, why no driver support!, AMD's IGPs can run many games why? it uses same driver base as Discrete Radeon HD cards like HD 4000/3000/2000 Series
the AMD M780G / HD 3200 core is based on a HD 2400 discrete core so ;)
tommarnk 3 years ago 2
amd is perferc for gamers around the globe, cheep and with great performance
NeMoMk 3 years ago
AMD siempre le va a ganar a intel en los graficos y en la velocidad
dx10977 3 years ago
look at the grafic card on intel....put a geforce pls .... stupid video
bogdan9 3 years ago
thanks for the video! i think i am going with amd and hd3200 now =)
sinniebunnie 3 years ago
are you freakin kidding me?... the intel is running a shitting GMA graphics.
thats the only reason why the turion looks better.
bigjoe87865 3 years ago 2
they are only using integrated graphics cards. unfortunately for intel, they don't have a GPU as good as HD3200...
if tey used something like hd3450 in that intel notebook, then they would be using AMD technology, wouldn't they?
abutulija 3 years ago 3
bigjoe87865...you're a moron. Both laptops have integrated graphics. This video shows how BAD the Intel graphics are compared to AMD/ATI new integrated graphics (the HD3200 IGP). This is a HUGE step for AMD since it will pull almost everyone on a budget to buy AMD based laptop.
soldersucker 3 years ago 6
I absolutely agree. It definitely persuaded me to.
Jasonian 3 years ago
Comment removed
StevensiTX 3 years ago
AMD really is better and cheap, very nice.
ZerGsiX 3 years ago 14
i agree with you, but only desktop amd's, on laptops there are crappy
gandalfwiz20007 2 years ago