The oficial taly of serious adverse events (ie. Guillain-Barre Syndrome) & deaths resulting from inoculation w Gardasil & Cervarix curently stands ‘3.34/100,000 doses distributed’, almst dble the avrage death rate frm cervical cancer (2.4/100,000 women). The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) confirmed, as of November 3, 2010, a total of 20,575 adverse reactions, including 352 reports of abnormal pap smears post vaccination& 89 reported deaths associatedGardisil&Cervarix
there's actually a number of experiments, studies, and data taken from medical histories- you can even watch it happen under a microscope with timelapse if u wanted. all of which that point it out as a very obvious result of HPV. -- HPV doesnt cause cancer in every case ofcourse. but a significant % of infections cause cancer- enough to compose 70% of cervical cancer.
4000 girls die from cervical cancer a year there is 144 million females in usa 4000 die from this out of 144 million thats about 0.0027777777 % so my point here is why take the chance of this chemical in your body when you are more likely to get in a plane crash then die from cervical cancer ..also this drug is all about money and anyone who thinks its not is just plain ignorant . 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
How many times did he say that screening PREVENTS cancer? PREVENTS!!! Try... finds. He's a doctor. Screening finds it after you have it, it cannot prevent it.
A friend of mine was pushed by her former gyno to get Gardasil. She did, unknownly of the dangers. A doctor should never sell you medical care. They should only provide you medical care. There is a big difference between these two things.
I understand your concern with this similiar CANCER problem. Please take just a few minutes to view "A NEW CURE FOR CANCER"listed here on the U-Tube. I think you will understand the difference in North and South Spun Fluids, we are all consuming(we are south-spun in our molecular make-up).Please leave me a comment if this info is helpful at all.Have a wonderous day!
The film describes screening as viable, but its positive portrayal of the vaccine may not be warranted at this time. It says screening is costly but doesn't say Merck makes this vaccine costly too. It doesn't mention Merck's lobbying to require all young girls in USA be vaccinated. Apparently, major question remain. The vaccine (FDA "fast tracked") hasn't been adequately tested for potential impacts on women's health and fertility down the road. Lets not set ourselves up for another DES.
This has been flagged as spam show
The oficial taly of serious adverse events (ie. Guillain-Barre Syndrome) & deaths resulting from inoculation w Gardasil & Cervarix curently stands ‘3.34/100,000 doses distributed’, almst dble the avrage death rate frm cervical cancer (2.4/100,000 women). The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) confirmed, as of November 3, 2010, a total of 20,575 adverse reactions, including 352 reports of abnormal pap smears post vaccination& 89 reported deaths associatedGardisil&Cervarix
promiseIsaih60 1 year ago
looks to me deadly when left untreated
ashfaquehq 1 year ago
There is no proof that HPV causes cervical cancer.
claymoreman90 2 years ago
i beg to differ.
there's actually a number of experiments, studies, and data taken from medical histories- you can even watch it happen under a microscope with timelapse if u wanted. all of which that point it out as a very obvious result of HPV. -- HPV doesnt cause cancer in every case ofcourse. but a significant % of infections cause cancer- enough to compose 70% of cervical cancer.
kahlern 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4000 girls die from cervical cancer a year there is 144 million females in usa 4000 die from this out of 144 million thats about 0.0027777777 % so my point here is why take the chance of this chemical in your body when you are more likely to get in a plane crash then die from cervical cancer ..also this drug is all about money and anyone who thinks its not is just plain ignorant . 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
pecincano 3 years ago
How many times did he say that screening PREVENTS cancer? PREVENTS!!! Try... finds. He's a doctor. Screening finds it after you have it, it cannot prevent it.
smileeus 3 years ago
i had the injectionn yoohoo
amyofjarra0708 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A friend of mine was pushed by her former gyno to get Gardasil. She did, unknownly of the dangers. A doctor should never sell you medical care. They should only provide you medical care. There is a big difference between these two things.
JoeyLxyz 3 years ago
@JoeyLxyz : The health department in my city offers the vaccine free of charge so i dont think its a big money thing.
co2oo8 1 year ago
I understand your concern with this similiar CANCER problem. Please take just a few minutes to view "A NEW CURE FOR CANCER"listed here on the U-Tube. I think you will understand the difference in North and South Spun Fluids, we are all consuming(we are south-spun in our molecular make-up).Please leave me a comment if this info is helpful at all.Have a wonderous day!
drdecharge13 4 years ago
Don't be a guinea pig for Merck vaccines. Remember vioxx?
pakieire 4 years ago
The film describes screening as viable, but its positive portrayal of the vaccine may not be warranted at this time. It says screening is costly but doesn't say Merck makes this vaccine costly too. It doesn't mention Merck's lobbying to require all young girls in USA be vaccinated. Apparently, major question remain. The vaccine (FDA "fast tracked") hasn't been adequately tested for potential impacts on women's health and fertility down the road. Lets not set ourselves up for another DES.
Howard1255 5 years ago
How much did Merck pay for this??
LOLLLLLL
erikkohler 5 years ago
Can anyone say Guinnie Pig? I hope this vaccine works. If it doesn't then we are back at square one and the CDC is 100 Billion dollars richer...
elucidatus 5 years ago
I thought it was a big problem here, but in India lots worse!
SamWoodie 5 years ago 2