Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ottoman hated jews they brought down the Ottoman empire during ww1 with their british zionist and saudi zionist arab zionist dogs, the zionist jews are the rats of the earth were ever they go they take their disease with them they must be exterminated

  • @YUSKHAN

    The Ottomans had spanish-french economy-finance ministers in this time, and we have Fugger jews who destroyed the contact between Transylvanian and hungrian armies 20 000 soldiers stayed at home and guns in Mohács battle, the germnas didnt help (habsburgs were under Fugger finance) Fuggers were early Rotchilds who wanted Northen Hungarian heavy-caves. Hobsburgs occupied, West and North Hungary , Ottomans occupied Cumania and Yazigia, trnsylvanians were your vassall.

  • @HungarianHistory

    I forgot somebody killed 2. th Luis polish-lithuanian Jagello king of hungary, maybe a fuggar-habsburg spy.

  • @HungarianHistory

    Mohács was the first zionist inside job of 1th Frank king of french, his sephardic jews in Ottoman elite, Fugger jews from Germany and the Habsburgs with Fugger money. We never give up after Mohács next came Habsburg imperialists, WW1, WW2, communism and now the zionist eu for our plain and sweet water! Its the reason for antisemitism in Hungary. Im proud to 600 000 killed jews under nazies! It was the reaction for their inside crimes!

  • @HungarianHistory

    The Germans Austrians,Hungerians and Ottomans won ww1 but, the jews and jewish bankers that were living in germany during ww1 brought america into ww1 to help the british empire if they got Palestine in return from the Ottomans, if Germany had won ww1 then ww2 would never have happened and most of the problems today would not be happening there would be peace on earth, so fuck hooked nose jew rat basteds which are about to start ww3 with Iran

  • Hungarians are Turkic

  • turk are mongols(The Turkic migration as defined in this article was the expansion of the Turkic peoples across most of Central Asia into Europe and the Middle East between the 6th and 11th centuries AD (the Early Middle Ages). Tribes less certainly identified as Turkic began their expansion centuries earlier as the predominant element of the Huns. Their prehistoric point of origin was the hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China and Inner Mongolia.)

  • @goran21715

    hahahahah

    turks are turks, mongols are mongols you are idiot! XD

  • @HungarianHistory hahaha you idiot the nation change him name policy with tme& nation around him name different name if you read mesopotamia history you see one nation had different name egypt named him different to ASSyrian in ancient lran had different name first was know Medes empire then persian then sassanbide then faris the qajat then lean in ancent time so turk are mongols & this fact go read turkic migration to see realy they mongols& what you try to deny it that appear your ignorant

  • @goran21715

    turks are from chus tribe. chus were post sumerians in iranian highland, post sumerians7scythians. turks have nothing with the mongols, they joined to xiongnu later with the third group the manchus! learn first write next!

  • @HungarianHistory ignore go read history there were any mention of turk in ancient history of Zagros or misopotamia (Kurds who were the native inhabitants of the area long before the migration of the other races and tribes.In an article published in Kurdistan Mustafa Qaradaghi states that Gutium or Guti,the ancient Kurds who spoke a branch of Hurrian language,which was also spoken by their kin of Subartu,Lulu, Kassite,& Mittani.Their capital city was in& around the town of Kirkuk, named Arrapha.

  • @HungarianHistory no my dear lranhighland know in history Zagros peoples and there wasn't any tribes in Zagros mountian chus tibes,you can return to archive of clay tablet of sumerian &akkadianb&assyrian &hurrian &mitanni,lol turk are real mogols go read (turkic migration )to know fact of turk mongols,dont care to spelling (next) go learn real history of turk mongols then account me in spelling correct or not(hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China &Inner Mongolia)

  • @goran21715

    tatars and mongols are different.

    chus were post sumerians and not türks, türks were tatars and chus (uze)

  • @HungarianHistory Tater imgration to north Russia ) they dont enter in midde east , lol we talk in orignal the turk and tater was tribes of mongols and they was nomadic tribes spreat in north of china and inner mongolia (although they are closely related to the Oghuz (Turkmens) and Karluks (Karakhanids, Sarts, Uyghurs). Neither did Bulgars (Kazan Tatars, Chuvash) and non-Muslim Turkic groups (Tuvans, Yakuts, Yugurs) come close to adopting the ethnonym "Turk" in its Islamic Era sense.

  • @goran21715

    the türk tribal unio is from xiongnu, in ad 91 the western huns begann the migration to west (Atillas huns), the east huns stayed at home (eftalites) they came later as avars. Attilas huns never lived in türk tribal unio. they were other part

  • @HungarianHistory l know that dear and all you say just right but foolish turk claim they have hun root they shame they mongols root, forethat they claim different trinbes except mongols

  • @goran21715

    xiongnu similar to cccp, multinational unio. huns (scythians), mongols, manchus, oghuzes (chus). the turkic races turanid and pamirid are from cro magnonid andronovo type, and r1a1 y-dna. mongols are bajkalid, sinoid, tungusic types with asian C3 y-dna!

  • @HungarianHistory No they not similar , the xiongnu was mongols tribes while the the scythian was eastern lranian tribes,so they different in race and language, the toran trem hadn't any relaion to turks race uran ancient name of lranian tribes ruled by farydun king east of oxues river in era of Zoroaster,there are not term asisian peoples in history,turk use this term to fake to other to cover him mongols original,cause the india and inran &arabian peninsula also asia &they not mongols race

  • @goran21715

    assyrians were from chus too.

  • @HungarianHistory its turk mongols encyclopoedia (The Turkic migration as defined in this article was the expansion of the Turkic peoples across most of Central Asia into Europe and the Middle East between the 6th and 11th centuries AD Tribes less certainly identified as Turkic began their expansion centuries earlier as the predominant element of the Huns. Their prehistoric point of origin was the hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China and Inner Mongolia)

  • @HungarianHistory Taking these circumstances into consideration it is probably safe to say that the Huns gradually extended their power and to some degree their presence from a Turkic and Mongolian urheimat across the plains to Europe by the first few centuries AD at the latest, probably before, The Hunnic leaders then commanded a vast Asian empire including many ethnicities and speaking many languages: Mongolian, Ugric, Iranian and possibly others as well as Turkic

  • @HungarianHistory The Turks or Proto-Turks were a large group of nomadic tribes that dominated the northern steppes from the 6th to the 8th century. The Chinese words for the Turks (Tujue 突厥 [twetkjuet] or Tiele 鐵勒 [tjetlak]) are derived from the Turkish word "Türk" or "Türküt". The Turkish languages belong to the Altaic language family. The Turks were originally nomad tribes that migrated with their cattle from pasture to pasture along the rivers in the steppe area of modern Mongolia

  • @HungarianHistory haha you stupid and ignor (The Turks or Proto-Turks were a large group of nomadic tribes that dominated the northern steppes from the 6th to the 8th century. The Chinese words for the Turks (Tujue 突厥 are derived from the Turkish word "Türk" or "Türküt". The Turkish languages belong to the Altaic language family. The Turks were originally nomad tribes that migrated with their cattle from pasture to pasture along the rivers in the steppe area of modern Mongolia.

  • a magyart többnyire a rokonnépek sanyargatták na meg a labancok!

  • Az lehet, hogy a Bolsevizmus Zsidó találmány, de azt ne feledjük, hogy 89 után szabad vásár volt. Özönlöttek be a zsidók meg minden. Horthy volt a legjobb, mielőtt még a Nácikkal kellett szövetkeznie. ÚJ KORMÁNYZÓT!

  • Arrow Cross forever!

  • Ment a pont, nagyszerű videók így tovább !

  • @Twycross

    no. but the Árpád dinasty originated in Subarto, Subartuans or hurrians had sumerian contact or origin.we are from Carpathian Basin, and our ancestors who lived in the Basin anytime! The Transylvanian Tabletts of Tartária (Romanian National Museum) had runes 7200 year old! these runes next in sumerian Balu Monuments (Brittish Museum-Jemdet Nassr Culture). The Ancient Midle East and Carpathia had contacts!

    Have you brain to this information?

  • @Twycross

    no. but the Árpád dinasty originated in Subarto, Subartuans or hurrians had sumerian contact or origin.we are from Carpathian Basin, and our ancestors who lived in the Basin anytime! The Transylvanian Tabletts of Tartária (Romanian National Museum) had runes 7200 year old! these runes next in sumerian Balu Monuments (Brittish Museum-Jemdet Nassr Culture). The Ancient Midle East and Carpathia had contacts!

    Have you brain to this information?

  • *****FREEDOM

  • Good video!

  • Testvérem ez annyira jó hogy ***** nem elég hozzá!

  • Szuperjó képvágások!

    Gratulálok!

  • Brothers...We are not Ottoman Janissary...We Anatolian Turks all brother of Magyars.Long live free Hungary with your heroes 

  • @TurkoTartarian lol all turk are mongols (The Turks or Proto-Turks were a large group of nomadic tribes that dominated the northern steppes from the 6th to the 8th century. The Chinese words for the Turks (Tujue 突厥 are derived from the Turkish word "Türk" or "Türküt". The Turkish languages belong to the Altaic language family. The Turks were originally nomad tribes that migrated with their cattle from pasture to pasture along the rivers in the steppe area of modern Mongolia. )

  • @TurkoTartarian THE TURL ARE MONGOLS (The Turkic migration as defined in this article was the expansion of the Turkic peoples across most of Central Asia into Europe and the Middle East between the 6th&11th centuries AD (the Early Middle Ages)Tribes less certainly identified as Turkic began their expansion centuries earlier as the predominant element of the Huns. Their prehistoric point of origin was the hypothetical Proto-Turkic region of the Far East including North China and Inner Mongolia.

  • @goran21715 Turks are only Turks :) But their name is Turk, surmane is Turanian ( like Hungarians,Proto-Bulgars, Mongols etc...) Mongols are our relatives that's true (like Gypsies are Slave people's relatives :) ) İf u research Slave nations history, u can find easily their teachers were Avars,Huns,Kypchaks and other Turkish tribes that settled North side of Black Sea and Alföld steppes..Otherwise, in Avar and Khazar graves,both Mongoloid and Europoid skulls found.

  • @TurkoTartarian So friend,there is no pure race in world today but historically many nations can be relative with each other (like Serbs-Russians or Hungarians-Turks etc..) We shall both like our cultures and relatives and believe humans equity

  • Naygon szep Klip Baratam

  • Nice video!

  • Good video!

  • We need in Poland to clean up some Zionists.

  • VESSZEN TRIANON !!

    GREETINGS FROM TÖRÖK !!

  • @Askar590

    ITS FROM SUMER

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more