Added: 3 years ago
From: exopol
Views: 5,554
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes, they are censoring important evidence. I have been BLOCKED and my comments removed from AE911Truth YouTube Channel. They do not want Dr. Judy Woods' evidence known or discussed. She has been deliberately excluded from the Toronto 911 Public Hearing. Something is very wrong.

    WATCH -

    Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez Questions Richard Gage at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011

    /watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU

    VERY TELLING !

  • 1/3 ~ SPECIAL Report - 1985 CNN ~ Electromagnetic - Radio Frequency Technology

    /watch?v=fq17HUxkTZ8

  • Ever seen an aceteline torch. That is what can happen when jet fuel (JP3) is mixed with air and is combusted. The wind currents in the World Trade Center caused that Jet Fuel to combust at a high temp.Glow Plugs don't even need oxygen, just pressure like was pressant that day on 9-11.

  • Thermite/thermate is the coverup story for the real cause. Of course "thermitic" material was found in the dust. The dust was made up of all the different materials that made up the building. Thermite is basically alluminium and iron oxide(rust). Well of course we will have both these materials in the dust - along with concrete dust, marble etc etc. Where did the towers go? Ask Dr. Judy Wood

  • Even more disturbing, darker than the idea that American citizens have been murdered in cold blood under the full glare of an Administration that leads the world in intelligence gathering, is the total blackout across the main news wires, including the BBC, of any forum for debating the evidence of FOUL PLAY.

    In an English Court the visible evidence is enough to mount a case for Prosecuting key people involved in the 911 scam. Each must answer under oath questions not asked by the media.

  • The evidence points to thermate or its

    counterpart - thermite. This

    compound was developed in the

    early 1900's & can burn at 4000 deg F When placed into a shaped

    wire wrap it will - when ignited - burn

    like a welding arc and easily cut

    through steel. Another less likely

    culprit for heat is white phosphorus. Remember that a paper fire does not burn much hotter than 500 deg Fahrenheit. Jet fuel burns around 1100 degrees.Steel does not start losing strength until temps over 2000 degrees.

  • The info's important here, but straining to hear it under the music is challenging. Thanks for posting this but could you turn the music down?

  • OMG good points are made here...

  • Nano-thermate was found in every dust sample collected - so argue all you want - it was used, if for no other reason but to confuse the issue. I believe they used more then nano-thermate and high-powered energy weapons - they used everything they had at their disposal. The existance of nano-thermite implicates the Us military. It is not available anywhere except for 2 US labs where it is produced. I doubt you can get it on the open market. It was a brand new invention in 2001 - check it out

  • Thermite is complete bullshit!

    Steven Jones is a government agent who worked in Los Alamo military base in the 80s on the weaponization of cold fusion.

    And his claims are ALL DEBUNKED. HE'S A LIAR!

    watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM

    He will NEVER EVER go in court with his bullshit, he would self-destruct the co-opted so-called "truth" movement, unlike Dr. Judy Wood.

  • @FringeReality

    "Thermite is complete bullshit!"

    While I can't rule out the possibility that the perps may have used some thermite (it would be a good way to muddy the waters), it becomes obvious when the evidence is examined that the thermite theory is...well...complete bullshit.

    What is a concern is that AE911truth have successfully got lots of credible professional people on board and managed to convince them to say "Thermite!" on cue.

    Gotta give the COINTELPROstitutes some credit, I guess.

  • The evidence points to thermate or its

    counterpart - thermite. This

    compound was developed in the

    early 1900's & can burn at 4000 deg F When placed into a shaped

    wire wrap it will - when ignited - burn

    like a welding arc and easily cut

    through steel. Another less likely

    culprit for heat is white phosphorus. Remember that a paper fire does not burn much hotter than 500 deg Fahrenheit. Jet fuel burns around 1100 degrees.Steel does not start losing strength until temps over 2000 degrees.

  • Holy smoke Batman!

  • i think it was the former canadian defence minister who talked on this issue, check him out. also, it is quite dissapointing to know that the truth movement went 'territorial' over their claims,if thats true.i always knew it had to be more than just simple demolition used if they were to carry out such an even in front of the public and the world.

  • 3:30 So numerous platic ID cards can surive the heat, but items (where the planes hit) were destroyed.

    Yeah. Do you need someone to explain the science of THE BUILDING WAS LARGE to you?

  • So what is this. The conspiracy is a conspiracy?

  • alot of people have been caught up in the tragedy of the whole thing, and believe what they were told....like mindless zombies.

    its a shame and quite dispickable a government would do such a thing, and the mainstream media.....helped them cover it up with fake video.....dont expect any help there.

    like sheep we are all being led to slaughter

  • Comment removed

  • So a video that says nothing, but repeat pointless statements by one guy saying he hasn't seen a phone isn't catering to mindless sheep like zombie activity?

    Amazing how these videos repeatedly forget to mention that the jet fuel set other things on fire which burn at much higher temperatures.

  • whats amazing is the thought that people acutally believe jet fuel can vaporize two 110 story bildings to no more than one story of rubble.

    only a fool would believe that

  • @leadstring66 - would be nice if we could get some fools, they would prob be able to think better than th bunkerhaus

  • not to mention that there was no fire up to floors80 and jet fuel burns at 530 degrees.......

    LOL

  • whats it gonna take for people to wake up? mainstream media isnt gonna help, as its obviously dominated by the same evil group of people that did this.

    excellent choice of music BTW ..been rediscovering my dusty old orb records lately :)

  • Good copy of Relics from the Rubble. Where to find for myself? Your clips are the ones I want, too. No doorknob... the store display... the file cabinet... the horseshoe, steel arriving at JFK on forklift, the meteorite, Architect's quote.. "have never seen the level of destruction..." Could you megaupload your avi or mpg files, please!? I want to make a video with these and more.

  • I rate this video a 5 star ,I saw something about 911 that I haven't seen before the horseshoe shaped 6 inch steel .Thanks for the work that was well done .

  • Larry Silverstein 'WE PULLED THE BUILDING" building 7

  • Comment removed

  • The building looked like a pyroclastic explosion and all the dust. There is video of steel turning to dust, the concrete, there were no large chunks, how did the upper levels of the building become pulverized? If it was a pancake you would see larger sections of the building.

  • There is a lot of evidence to support the use of thermite on 9/11. Search youtube or google.

  • -

    Steve Jones chain of evidence custody wasn't the best...

    Anyway - who cares THERMATE plus D.E.W. is possible. It's not either or binary logic with this stuff.

    -

  • I agree with you there. I just thought the video footage of molten metal weeks after the event took place was compelling.

  • "Bums" are human beings. Dirty jokes are vulgar. And you are a hypocrite.

  • And when is your boyfriend, John Hutchison, going to start standing up for 911 Truth?

  • Can't see the problem you have with swearing. You like dirty jokes according to your channel description. You're not being too much of a hypocrite there, Andrew, are you? LOL!

  • -- Re below--

    Instead of calling each other frackkin' idiots - discuss the data. From what I know thermate was not used to pulverise concrete...

    And...

    Thermate does not cause just PLASTIC ID cards to be left when metallic objects go molten.

    Thermate cannot put huge circular holes in the tops of buildings.

    Thermate cannot cause geological monitoring stations to register a huge peak in magnetic resonance at the time the towers came down.

    -

  • "Some" eyewitnesses saw planes.

    Most didn't. And some saw something other than a plane.

    Keep twisting the truth. You'll be irrelevant very soon.

  • forget googling judy wood, just youtube search her interview. A physicist who is serious about 9/11 truth asks some very simple questions about her theory and she just dribbles nonsense the whole time. This hutchison guy is a known hoax-artist as well. watch her interview and you'll know why so many 9//1 truth-seekers have no stomach for her theory.

  • try this blog, it has the interview on there as well as a transcript, analysis and links to sources.

    w , 911blogger , com/node/8110

  • That "physicist" is now nowhere to be found. The video was edited to make it look like she wasn't answering his questions.

    It was a vidscam, and you're promoting it.

    You should check out all of all person's videos before opening your mouth.

  • Your reaction is a strange one. That video was NOT edited and this judy wood person has nothing to say about science, just "pictures".

    It's true that conventional demolition doesn't cause the pulverization we saw, but this wasn't conventional demolition. We know that the thermate used by the military could have achieved this effect. I'm sick of the hoaxes and disinformation, 911research is an excellent website that isn't as patriotic about its findings as you seem to be. Use your brain.

  • Yeah, yeah. Your bullshit is losing ground daily.

    You never counted for much of anything, and soon, you'll be completely irrelevant. lol

  • YOU BELIEVE THE PLANES WERE HOLOGRAMS!

    You're a fucking idiot.

    Were ufo's and the devil also involved?

    You make 9/11 truthers look like retards when you buy into this shit. No matter, we'll see how "holgraphic" the nuke missing from the US military is when obama false flags us into world war 3.

    Fend for yourself, fucker.

  • You are such a fool! LOL

  • I know the american media is controlled by 5 corporations but you're the fool if you think every cameraman, editor and low level employee in these news offices were in on the conspiracy.

    Energy weapons and holographic planes?  Ridiculous.

    Eyewitnesses saw planes.

  • @-obeliskbreaker

    --> you are just the type of person that represents the current mainstream 9/11 researcher to me. Probably got into it after you mum gave you a copy of Loose Change (8th edition) in 2007.

    "Were ufo's and the devil also involved?"

    -- I wondered when that line would come out. Classic cliche. The other guy was right - you're an armchair 'ho.

  • Check out architects and engineers for 9/11 truth for starters. The reason it doesn't resemble classic controlled demolition is because they didn't use dynamite or c4.

    Undetonated thermite was found in the pulverized dust.

    You need to check the credibility of your sources, seriously. wood and hutchison have no evidence of their hypothesis'.

    It is far more likely that they knew the attack was coming, allowed it to happen and then demolished the buildings & falsified the names of the hijackers.

  • they also have enrgy weapons.

    see John Hutchison effect and targetted energy weapons

  • JESUS CHRIST! You're one of those "fake plane doctored video" people, you're not doing us any favours here promoting that nonsense! What the fuck is wrong with you people?

  • What the fuck is wrong with "you people"? LOL

    Well, now that I know I'm not doing a disingenuous cocksucker like you any favors, I haven't got a problem in the world. You just made my day.

    We salute you, armchair whore. lol

  • Look who's talking

  • LOL You are such a fool!

  • I wouldnt count out , them testing a new classified weapon on ourselves .

    the firetruck with the front half melted is a good example of wtf could do that .

    good vid!

  • Fantastic video!

    We're gonna get these pricks.

  • The photo at 1:41. Man, where does the energy come from to blow that shit. I mean look at it! That is a freekin explosion.

    Ya know the interior columns WeRe accessible from the elevator shafts, and there was also room between floors, kindof like a crawl space, so there was no need to go into office space.

  • Great. Respect!

  • Thank you for that,what about vapourised human victims? why does Dr.Judy Wood get such a bad press from the rest of the 9/11 truth movement? her theories fit the facts.

  • I think that stands out

    good vid, I like the big rock thing that fused into whatever that is o.O

  • Ever seen the sphire turn to dust? Who knows what type of energy could turn that 4 inch steel into dust.amazing and obvious the media and reporters will rot in jail

  • -

    Yup - if the spire/column footage is really just that - it basically closes the case on conventional demolition.

    If anyone wants to see it - there is an animated gif of OK type quality on Judy Wood's site.

    -

  • @exopol WTC1 Spires Dropped--not vaporized NIST FOIA: WTC1 Collapse (WNBC Dub10 54) Search and watch this title on Youtube. The recently released, better quality videos show the columns falling down, NOT dissociating.

    Judy Wood would postpone discovery of the WHO, saying that when we know HOW, we will find out WHO did 9/11. It is ten years and the WHO are still at large.

    ReDiscover911. COM

  • so what weapons are you talking about? The video doesn't really say anything at all.

  • -

    Well get to the end of the video and see the two URLs I suggested ppl look at and spend TIME doing so - you can't weigh things up on 5 mins online.

    -

  • A nuclear reaction causes the most dense mass to absorb the reaction which causes molecular disassociation to occur in the higher mass count. Think about it. Why was paper left alone. Reduce paper to it's actual mass, there's not enough mass to absorb anything so the energy would pass it by to the denser material. Physics will not lie!

  • Micro nukes.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more