Sure; he tries to make it sound like it was a heroic thing to do, but what Larry Silverstein didn't mention is that he had JUST taken a multi-million dollar insurance policy on the building 2 or 3 weeks before 9/11.
....and we're the "conspirators" for asking questions...????
"PoetryZound" has posted comments on many different 9/11 TRUTH videos using alias screen names, he tries to get people to argue with him so he can repeat disinformation over & over again. He is clearly a shill & government sponsored disinformation COINTELPRO operative. Do not be fooled into arguing with him, thats what he wants so he can repeat disinformation again & again.
oh ppl and it turned out that silverstein did NOT talk to the fire commander on the phone about wtc..the commander denied even havin tht convo...and than when asked about this at some speech silverstein was giving...he said "next question"...got a liar already
Think about what Silverstein is referring to when he uses the pronoun "it"... Would he say "pull it" with the word "it" referring to the occupants of the building and the firefighters (who were already out of the building)? Of course not; he is clearly referring to WTC 7, which he was talking about in the sentences immediately preceding this one. He then continues by using the pronoun "it" in place of WTC 7.
Look up firefighting terms used by firefighters. Nowhere is the term "pull" or "pull it" listed. This is a demolition term. Furthermore, "pull it" is also NOT the colloquial English term meaning "evacuate." Also, Silverstein uses two forms of the verb "pull", the second of which is used in a direct causal relationship with "then we watched the building collapse." It is obvious that there is a causal relationship between "pull" and "collapse."
What a bunch of crap! How many times do we need to hear these stupid lies repeated? He is NOT talking about, "pulling down" the building; he is taking about, "pulling out" the firefighters. This is pathetic! But I guess for those who wish to ignore reality, taking things out of context is a necessity.
Sure; he tries to make it sound like it was a heroic thing to do, but what Larry Silverstein didn't mention is that he had JUST taken a multi-million dollar insurance policy on the building 2 or 3 weeks before 9/11.
....and we're the "conspirators" for asking questions...????
ichbingott4510 5 months ago in playlist WTC 911 Act
**** READERS BEWARE **** READERS BEWARE ****
"PoetryZound" has posted comments on many different 9/11 TRUTH videos using alias screen names, he tries to get people to argue with him so he can repeat disinformation over & over again. He is clearly a shill & government sponsored disinformation COINTELPRO operative. Do not be fooled into arguing with him, thats what he wants so he can repeat disinformation again & again.
JG1635 1 year ago
Well demarspeed199, if as you say Silverstein didn't talk to the fire commander, then he didn't tell anyone to pull it.
PoetryZound 1 year ago
oh ppl and it turned out that silverstein did NOT talk to the fire commander on the phone about wtc..the commander denied even havin tht convo...and than when asked about this at some speech silverstein was giving...he said "next question"...got a liar already
demarspeed199 2 years ago
In addition to the comments below:
Think about what Silverstein is referring to when he uses the pronoun "it"... Would he say "pull it" with the word "it" referring to the occupants of the building and the firefighters (who were already out of the building)? Of course not; he is clearly referring to WTC 7, which he was talking about in the sentences immediately preceding this one. He then continues by using the pronoun "it" in place of WTC 7.
mvanbebber 3 years ago
Here's a linguistic approach to this argument:
Look up firefighting terms used by firefighters. Nowhere is the term "pull" or "pull it" listed. This is a demolition term. Furthermore, "pull it" is also NOT the colloquial English term meaning "evacuate." Also, Silverstein uses two forms of the verb "pull", the second of which is used in a direct causal relationship with "then we watched the building collapse." It is obvious that there is a causal relationship between "pull" and "collapse."
mvanbebber 3 years ago
What a bunch of crap! How many times do we need to hear these stupid lies repeated? He is NOT talking about, "pulling down" the building; he is taking about, "pulling out" the firefighters. This is pathetic! But I guess for those who wish to ignore reality, taking things out of context is a necessity.
jamesklambert 4 years ago