Yes but it can't defeat the Dassault Rafale or the F-22 or the PAK-FA or the J-20 :*)
I love how people make comments like this when the PAK-FA and J-20 don't yet exist in any comparable sense.
PAK-FA is likely to be comparable with the eurofighter typhoon the russian technology is way behind the US its just talked up to give the likes of lockheed martin and excuse to build F-22's
For all the arguments about wich is the better plane:
Germany had a lot of fucking advanced planes in world war 2, yet they lost to the british, who were still flying with a lot of bi-planes. Its not really the plane or the technology. Its the courage and character that is holding the damn stick and the peole in their ears who tell them what to do.
@zerocker45 I do not. I know someone that flies a Eurofighter Typhoon and he said it is the most advanced aircraft in the world and will beat pretty much any plane in a dogfight. I'm only going off what he's saying but i'm rather certain he knows what he's talking about :P
@Vann7 very true.. honestly i am not familiar with the actual targeting systems of the US and Russian fighters, but from what i have seen from simulators, russian (Mig 29 and Su-27) are superior to US F-15 and F-18 for example. They might not have the comprehensiveness of the US but they have much better range. And the missiles are way more effective. The Vympel and the Novator, are way beyond the AMRAAM and Phoenix. They have a range between 200 and 500 km! Mach 4.5 to 6!
@mihailofsx@mihailofsx it was said that chinnese Submarines shot down the F22 that crashed in Alaska.. no idea if true.. but the events around the F22 "accident" if you google and research forums for some time.... are very suspicious to say the least. like the F22 being armed with a nuclear weapon.. the american pilot dont eject and submarines of china been spotted there days before that. to name a few.
@Vann7 does not do them any good if they can not get a lock
and thats where the f-22 shines
btw i love the russians and i am very glad we like each other i dont want to find out who really could win the war cuse i think every one would loose if it came down to it
but ya yall may have the ordinances but we have the delivery system
@hardwirecars not all missiles are Radar signal chase..or laser visual lock. there are InfraRed missiles they detect heat of *jets and but also radio signals.. All Russians modern jets can fire missiles at 4xtimes the range of 40km Aim120. that is ~160km and they can be guided by remote controll..means F22 will have to avoid them FIRST ,before they have a chance to fire anything . so last thing an F22 pilot will like is to have a 5 of those missiles chasing you.
@hardwirecars Just remember that stealth techonoly in F22 , does NOT means that they are 100% invisible . that doesnt exist. in Kosovo warfor example one F-117 was shot down by old Sa-3 rusian missiles, you can wiki it. F22 stealth technology allows them to have a way lower radar signal than normal jets.but still they can be tracked. and their heat thats questionable.you can't hide the engines gases emission at all,. youtube seach
- - -
IR Signature Comparison Jet Fighter - Rafale - F22
@Vann7 oh i know that its not 100% invisible i just under stand that right now it is the best that we (hole world) have gotten
and the f-22 has hidden its engine temps there is something to the (i think they are called ) cowls on the exhaust that makes its engine temp read much much much lower then any other jet.
@hardwirecars but the biggest nightmare for F22 pilots will be Russians land defense systems like S-300 /S-400 .their range is naturally way higher about ~400km. and their speed about 10x times of any modern jet. and they were made to counter "stealth" planes and icbm.
means than in theory Venezuela will be able to shot down an F22 flying in
south florida.
but more interesting will be to compare the F22 vs PAK-T50 ,
they made it to counter F22 and F-35 and also have stealth.tech.
@Vann7 Venezuela is over 1,800 km from the southern most point of south Florida... Either way you need line of sight for detection and tracking with radar or optical sensor systems, an F22 traveling low at supersonic speeds following a preplanned course plotted with satellite surveillance would penetrate enemy airspace without a wink.
@Prometheus203 well. in practice you will never see an F22 ,close to venezuela or any other "hostile" territory, friendly to russians. is their top superiority fighter ,and they are not going to risk their tech losing one in an dangerous zone ,so that Russians or allies can reverse engineer it. as happened before w/ the F-117 in bosnia with much older defense.about the low altitude -speed tactic, you will need more than luck to evade an S-300PMU that can target very low fly 2m at mach 8 speeds.
@vfIskullangel lol. that was pathetic. the fucking missle looks like a toy. lmao. j-20 will rape the shit out of that piece of crap. i wouldn't count on that aim120 to deliver the package. it looks so weak. it'll be so ez to lose that, even the j-20 can do it.
@ervin920 oh yea does china have a stealth no does chinas government work no in fact communism fails all over the world examples ussr cuba vietnam and your j-20 is prone engine failure you commy so shove an eggroll in it.
@mrfrankincense only for a little bit and its like your saying its all pointless cause of that quirk.the missile is going to give it away anyway but we don't even know all the tricks the f-22 has up its sleave if im not mistaken a lot of it is still classified.
@mrfrankincense im not so sure.things like all its radar capability and of course how the technology works.there is a bit more to be released I think but why would we yet?a suitable rival has not arrived yet.
@GreyGeek77 The F-22 (and most modern "stealth" fighters)' "S" type air intakes have a great increase in drag when getting close to mach two so I doubt that the Raptor or the Pak FA surpass mach two by more than .4.
/watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M LOOL its funny how somehow foreign countries know everything bout US nad what is does and what/how its aircraft operate...........just like they knew that obamas trip to asia costed over 200million a day or 2billion a week LOOL
@TH7596 you are a silly partisan hack. Please document your "$200 MILLION A DAY" claim.. If you can't, or if it's lush dumbaugh, don't waste your breath.
@sonofrock97 Not exactly,Its cross signature shows up on radar as the size of a bird,But Russia has some pretty advanced SAMs and I wouldnt send an F-22 to attack them anytime soon
@schicktd Not anymore. They solved that problem by having all internal racks equipped with hydraulic arms, which shove the missile away from the plane. Inverted or not, the raptor has teeth
@DirectInjected Yeah,That might be the case...In a video game...there's a Big distinction in the real world....Until i see it happen....I'm going take your words with a grain of salt...There's always been some sort of actuator to push the bomb of rocket away from the aircraft...Be it CAD or Hydraulic as you explained...Not in a purely inverted position though...
@SangheiliSniper11 apparently not. in simulated air war with china and russia, the F22, F35 and F18 superhornet werent as good as the russians aircraft.
@SangheiliSniper11 depends on who writes the program. If I work for lockhead wanna bet lockhead wins or if i work for mig to continue my employment I wouold bet they win. at least till the next modell is available.
in the real world the mig 29 didn't do so well and yet on paper they were supposed to be better.
@christos200 Good aircraft, it does lack a reduced radar cross section though, in terms of russian aircraft I think the SU-47 was the best, I'm not the biggest fan of the SU-35 or PAK-FA
@SangheiliSniper11 the su-35 bm/s has 3 radars. and one facing back. it can also backfire those r-27 missiles. the one radar does search on the x-band(if i'm not mistaken) which makes the f22 vissible on great distances. it is the latest version. i like the F-22 but the su-35bm/s was builted as an Anti-F22 fighter. and the su47 whas just a show plane . only 2 where builded
@christos200 xband doesn't pick up the F-22, It's still in development. The BM docent serve as a decent anti-f-22 aircraft, no aircraft can. The PAK-FA is still being built, the SU-47, the only match for the F-22, was never built. The Russian aviation ministry classified it a test aircraft but you should know that when it was in test phase it was an armed aircraft. The Russian aircraft still lacks an "anti-F-22" aircraft. If you're thinking low band radar, that still cant pick up the F-22.
@SangheiliSniper11 Do you happen to know why the SU-47 never made it to production? I find it to be one of the most beautiful fighters ever built, although, I still love the F-22!
@STRYKER1467 its momentum, if you had any brains you would realise that anything inside a moving object has the same speed, thats why when your in a car you only get pressed against the seat when it accelerates but not when its moving, that's also why if you threw a ball out of the window it would be traveling at the same speed at the car you dipshit. dont make factual assumptions unless you know the facts yourself fcktard
@STRYKER1467 Learn some physics you little girl. anything inside the F22 would be moving at the same momentum, so when it is dropped out and is rocket propelled forward, it would gain even more momentum, going faster than the F22. Maybe you should try thinking before typing, dumbass.
@LiveAndLetDie222 when its dropped, out of the plane, it has to go twice as fast as the plane, as shown in the video. that seems like a remarkable speed for a missle to be going. im not saying its fake or anything, but iv never seen anything like that
it doesnt tho, have you seen the amount of $trillions the US national debt is? theres no way to recover from that amount debt yet the amount spent each year on the military is vast.
bad times ahead for the US, its consuming itself to ruin.
what is the way? national debt of approx $15 trillion, growing by $4 billion a day since 2007. public debt equalling $40 thousand per person.
there only seems to be ron paul addressing it. us debt held by foreigners is high, esp china and japan, the world currency is dollars, the oil standard is (petro)dollars but the producers are talking about change to euro's, Iraq did and look what happened there, Iran are doing the same thing. unstable dollar fucks the world. not looking good
im not getting at the US, i spent most life in the US but live in europe now. im concerned, the fed is dodgy but thats just 1 of many, america was a great special country but its being destroyed under our feet, it just seems to be a platform now for the wealthy elite to get more wealth, power and play war games on the world for control of the planet without giving a shit about the consequences to the country and the american people. americans are wising up rapidly tho which is good.
A poor pilot in the SU-37 would be dead before he ever new a F-22 was even in the area! Stealth is the major factor in a real life battle between these planes.
The only thing that sucks here is your english, mate.
Have you ever actually heard of a bombing mission that requires the plane to fly upside down
Or how likely is it that the pilot of the f22 will be in a vantage point and able to fire an Aim 9 in a dogfight, while he is upside down.
That might be a problem, IF the missile wouldnt be extended out of the bay, and indeed out of the fuselage to allow its IR- seeker to get a wiff of the plane its being fired at.
PAK FA doesn't exist. So far the only thing that rapes is the Raptor because it is real. Besides the Raptor was developed in the 90's. Its design is almost 20 years old and the Russians are finally developing something that MIGHT come close. But years later.
SU-47 featured some of tech a F-22 has. Russia wasn't able to continue development due to the '90s economy collapse but they have a plan designed it's just undergoing testing.
SU-47 is a demonstration jet. You build a demonstration jet to test new technologies in real world. The SU-47 will never be a production jet. It's similar to the US x jet program.
Yes and on that jet was RAM, the very thing that makes the F-22 stealthy(n' shape). It also had 3D thrust vectoring which the F-22 doesn't have. Then again it's a ex aircraft but you never now. Also Russia has a history of releasing their aircraft after the competitor did, to cheat of em'.
The Russians will never be able to afford a stealth fighter. For every hour the Raptor flies it costs $40,000+ plus to maintain due to the stealth coating. Our military budget it more than the worlds combined. Even if the Raptor is the greatest fighter ever made I bet we have something better not released. Thats why the pentagon allowed the program to be cut back.
Stealth was not invented in Russia. A Russian scientist developed mathmatical equations that helped design stealthy shapes but the Russians never developed anything from it.
It makes a huge difference. The Russian military did not develop stealth. The US took all the knowledge of stealth and created the first viable stealth aircraft.
They developed the flying wing design which in inherently stealthy. I have never heard or read anything that says they were purposely trying to find a design that avoids radar.
@101andrewj well yeah the germans wer just starting to figure it out.... unfortunitly the germans wer defeated and the americans stole a bunch of there top nazi scientists.... but if the germans wer givin more time.... like if they won ww2... they deffently would have been the first to build a complete stealth plane.... altho the first was designed to scatter radar beams and was made of wood 2 obsorb some of the radar
@101andrewj ya I saw that on Discovery channel... btw the only reason for USA having that kind of Army is cuz every single European scientist goes there >.>
@disturbedone5009 Russian and Germany pretty much invented a lot of things that changed the world. I wouldn't be surprised if they did. But you're right russia ran out of money after that none of what they came up with went anywhere.
But we Americans actually are your friends, albeit not close, and we are not at war with you. In fact, we are both invested in the International Space Station, working together for the common good. True, Lockheed took the scientific paper written by a Russian, and applied it to develop stealth technology / F/A-117. There is far more to the F-22 than just stealth - supercruise, AESA radar, avionics, integration with other systems in the theater of operations, ...
i dont see why the pentagon and congress spend so much damn money anymore, we have the worlds largest military, and the only enemies were bound to face are those of terrorist groups, north korea may have strained relationships with the US, but i doubt they'll want to go to war with us because they know we can blow them off the map. all this continual military spending is pointless imo -__-
You can never have a too strong military but you can have a weak military that will allow you to get your ass kicked. Every time we have entered a war with a global power we get our ass kicked until the military gets its shit together. WW1 we didn't have any infantry rifles so we redesigned the Lee Enfield (which we were building for the British. WW2 none of our fighters could hang with the Messerschmidt or Zero. Korea we were getting destroyed by the MiG15.
but think about it, honestly, look at our military, if you say that its not enough to protect this country, they you have had ur head up your ass for way too long. our military is the largest in the world, and even the next three top militaries combined dont equal our own. Our military, as it is, is more than enough to protect our country, but people just enjoy spending money to come up with new ways to kill people, and thats the shit i dont like nor understand.
Largest in the world? 1. China - 1,700,000 2. India - 1,200,000 3. North Korea - 900,000 4. South Korea - 560,000 5. Pakistan - 520,000 6. United States - 475,000 7. Iraq - 360,000 - Pre-2003 8. Myanmar - 325,000 9. Russia - 320,000 10. Iran - 320,000 You sure about that?
hmm i read somewhere that we did have the largest military, must have been a dud. well, you get my point right? its bs that we spend so much when half the countries you listed up there are not hostile. Our military is the most technologically advanced in the world, that you cant deny, so the constant use and purchase of expensive equipment like the raptor is somewhat pointless.
To me, if were going to spend that much money, at least spend it on something useful and combat tested, like the predator UAV's. I just dont see why a military as strong as ours which has no equal from any of our enemies(technologically) see the purchase and continual funding of projects such as the raptor(even though it has been put on hold) and the newer and larger carriers the navy plans on building. The money used to fund the military could fix a large number of problems this country has.
If China and N Korea invaded we would be in a world of shit. Most of our military is spread all over the world and the majority of civilians that do have firearms have ones that are ineffective or obsolete tactically.
At this point in time our military is the most technologically advanced yes but that is right now only. Who knows what will come out of Russia or China. The Raptor has no equal in the air right now. That makes it extremely valuable.
i agree with the fact that the F-22 is a great asset to us, but i dont see an invasion by china or north korea happening because while our country itself has limited manpower, we do have allies and in a situation where we have to wage war on our own soil, i doubt they wouldnt come and help us out. and also, to amass an invasion force to attack us effectively without anyone noticing would be quite the longshot.
. look at D-day, even with the limited recon methods back then, the germans were semi-prepared for the invasion, even though their best fighting forces were stationed further north, the crack panzer divisions and ss stationed at normandy put up quite a fight. and if they did manage to invade, the sheer amount of resources needed to keep the invading army supplied would eventually bite them in the ass, just like the germans.
even in the worst case scenario of an invasion of our homeland, i have anough faith in the military of this country that i know we'd be able to push them back
Our military is far from the largest in the world. with all our guys, we are nothing more than 600,000 people, reserves included. China has a standing army of over 2.8 MILLION! We are just one of the most advanced.
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes but it can't defeat the Dassault Rafale or the F-22 or the PAK-FA or the J-20 :*)
I love how people make comments like this when the PAK-FA and J-20 don't yet exist in any comparable sense.
PAK-FA is likely to be comparable with the eurofighter typhoon the russian technology is way behind the US its just talked up to give the likes of lockheed martin and excuse to build F-22's
jmpompey1 1 month ago
Reminds me of the Microprose game F19 stealth from 1988. Open baydoors fire missile close baydoors and get the hell out..
merstrand 1 month ago
@gummy0021 Thanks :) but maybe I knew all along and I trolled the troll.. now thats some twilight zone shit
larzinator1988 4 months ago
@gummy0021 nice trolling you almost convinced me
larzinator1988 4 months ago
@gummy0021 the plane is but an extension of the pilot, thats the first thing a fighter pilot learns
larzinator1988 4 months ago
For all the arguments about wich is the better plane:
Germany had a lot of fucking advanced planes in world war 2, yet they lost to the british, who were still flying with a lot of bi-planes. Its not really the plane or the technology. Its the courage and character that is holding the damn stick and the peole in their ears who tell them what to do.
larzinator1988 4 months ago
ахха F-22 груда железа которую бояться даже выпустить на поле боя янки почему то побоялись выпустить их в Ливии
Ghetto00750 5 months ago
@Ghetto00750 F-22 истребитель воздушного боя прежде всего. С кем там в Ливии воевать было? Со старенькими МиГ-23? Где достойный противник?
lamerchaynik 1 month ago
Actually the J-20 could be a lot better than the F-22 at Dogfights.
zerocker45 5 months ago
@zerocker45
Its all about the PAK-FA
marinecorpsman5 5 months ago
@marinecorpsman5 Yes.. the airplanes competing right now are the F-22 Raptor, the PAK-FA and the J-20.
zerocker45 5 months ago
@zerocker45 Eurofighter is beast :P
Jiminibobster 5 months ago
@Jiminibobster Yes but it can't defeat the Dassault Rafale or the F-22 or the PAK-FA or the J-20 :*)
zerocker45 5 months ago
@zerocker45 Oh I bet it can ;)
Jiminibobster 5 months ago
@Jiminibobster Well... it can but the probabilities are very low... Is like a MiG-21 vs. F-14... or MiG-23 vs. F-18... you get it?
zerocker45 5 months ago
@zerocker45 I do not. I know someone that flies a Eurofighter Typhoon and he said it is the most advanced aircraft in the world and will beat pretty much any plane in a dogfight. I'm only going off what he's saying but i'm rather certain he knows what he's talking about :P
Jiminibobster 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Jiminibobster If thats your opinion... Well, Ok.
zerocker45 5 months ago
Making money for the Chinese
marktimmer2212 5 months ago
@engaurd This was at normal frame rate.
liOVERLOADil 5 months ago
i just guessing the mig is in to pieces now
Machinewar6 6 months ago
that's aim-120d
dharmdevil 6 months ago
lol it would be funny if the f22 went supersonic and flew past its missle XD
SlyTy98 6 months ago
damn..... america
Mikerohren 6 months ago
lol the missile looks like a bug on crack. wait for iiiiit-WEE!
EliteMadHornet 6 months ago
Bye bye my house.
bunny153649 6 months ago
USA is not to be fucked with.
KingofBiH 6 months ago
@smilingvulcan can one ather fighter jet on this world fires a missile at supersonic speed?? plz reply
aarrmmeenndd100 7 months ago
OMG that was AMAZAZING
thunderstrike534 7 months ago
Holy s**t, that was cool!
activeattack75 7 months ago
Comment removed
Vann7 7 months ago
@Vann7 very true.. honestly i am not familiar with the actual targeting systems of the US and Russian fighters, but from what i have seen from simulators, russian (Mig 29 and Su-27) are superior to US F-15 and F-18 for example. They might not have the comprehensiveness of the US but they have much better range. And the missiles are way more effective. The Vympel and the Novator, are way beyond the AMRAAM and Phoenix. They have a range between 200 and 500 km! Mach 4.5 to 6!
mihailofsx 7 months ago
Comment removed
Vann7 7 months ago
@mihailofsx @mihailofsx it was said that chinnese Submarines shot down the F22 that crashed in Alaska.. no idea if true.. but the events around the F22 "accident" if you google and research forums for some time.... are very suspicious to say the least. like the F22 being armed with a nuclear weapon.. the american pilot dont eject and submarines of china been spotted there days before that. to name a few.
Vann7 7 months ago
@Vann7 does not do them any good if they can not get a lock
and thats where the f-22 shines
btw i love the russians and i am very glad we like each other i dont want to find out who really could win the war cuse i think every one would loose if it came down to it
but ya yall may have the ordinances but we have the delivery system
hardwirecars 7 months ago
@hardwirecars not all missiles are Radar signal chase..or laser visual lock. there are InfraRed missiles they detect heat of *jets and but also radio signals.. All Russians modern jets can fire missiles at 4xtimes the range of 40km Aim120. that is ~160km and they can be guided by remote controll..means F22 will have to avoid them FIRST ,before they have a chance to fire anything . so last thing an F22 pilot will like is to have a 5 of those missiles chasing you.
Vann7 7 months ago
@Vann7 f-22 even has heat stealth and good luck finding your target visually at 25+ miles
hardwirecars 7 months ago
Comment removed
Vann7 7 months ago
@hardwirecars Just remember that stealth techonoly in F22 , does NOT means that they are 100% invisible . that doesnt exist. in Kosovo warfor example one F-117 was shot down by old Sa-3 rusian missiles, you can wiki it. F22 stealth technology allows them to have a way lower radar signal than normal jets.but still they can be tracked. and their heat thats questionable.you can't hide the engines gases emission at all,. youtube seach
- - -
IR Signature Comparison Jet Fighter - Rafale - F22
Vann7 7 months ago
@Vann7 oh i know that its not 100% invisible i just under stand that right now it is the best that we (hole world) have gotten
and the f-22 has hidden its engine temps there is something to the (i think they are called ) cowls on the exhaust that makes its engine temp read much much much lower then any other jet.
hardwirecars 7 months ago
@hardwirecars but the biggest nightmare for F22 pilots will be Russians land defense systems like S-300 /S-400 .their range is naturally way higher about ~400km. and their speed about 10x times of any modern jet. and they were made to counter "stealth" planes and icbm.
means than in theory Venezuela will be able to shot down an F22 flying in
south florida.
but more interesting will be to compare the F22 vs PAK-T50 ,
they made it to counter F22 and F-35 and also have stealth.tech.
Vann7 7 months ago
@Vann7 Venezuela is over 1,800 km from the southern most point of south Florida... Either way you need line of sight for detection and tracking with radar or optical sensor systems, an F22 traveling low at supersonic speeds following a preplanned course plotted with satellite surveillance would penetrate enemy airspace without a wink.
Prometheus203 6 months ago
@Prometheus203 well. in practice you will never see an F22 ,close to venezuela or any other "hostile" territory, friendly to russians. is their top superiority fighter ,and they are not going to risk their tech losing one in an dangerous zone ,so that Russians or allies can reverse engineer it. as happened before w/ the F-117 in bosnia with much older defense.about the low altitude -speed tactic, you will need more than luck to evade an S-300PMU that can target very low fly 2m at mach 8 speeds.
Vann7 6 months ago
Comment removed
Vann7 6 months ago
I wonder what effect this has on missile range as the missile expends less time accelerating?
marshfield01 8 months ago
"The US sucks". Let their enemies believe...
IauthenticI 8 months ago
Look at that accelration!
The f-22 was already suersonic :)
kastek9v 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unfortuantly the drag on this type of plane is so bad tht it can not pass mach 3 an F-22 Raptor can easily pass one of this
Maltese123able 9 months ago
Unfortuantly the drag on this type of plane is so bad tht it can not pass mach 3 an F-22 can easily pass one of this
Maltese123able 9 months ago
Srry typo in here
Maltese123able 9 months ago
srry typo plz read the one above...
Maltese123able 9 months ago
bye bye J-20....
vfIskullangel 1 year ago 53
@vfIskullangel lol. that was pathetic. the fucking missle looks like a toy. lmao. j-20 will rape the shit out of that piece of crap. i wouldn't count on that aim120 to deliver the package. it looks so weak. it'll be so ez to lose that, even the j-20 can do it.
ervin920 8 months ago
@ervin920 oh yea does china have a stealth no does chinas government work no in fact communism fails all over the world examples ussr cuba vietnam and your j-20 is prone engine failure you commy so shove an eggroll in it.
blurrblaster 7 months ago
Enemy's radar just detected him and turned away.
mrfrankincense 1 year ago
@mrfrankincense but they were ambushed at a time and place of the f-22's choosing.and the missle goes mach 4.
renegadekav 1 year ago
@renegadekav true but Why make a stealth aircraft that can't shoot without losing that advantage?
mrfrankincense 1 year ago
@mrfrankincense only for a little bit and its like your saying its all pointless cause of that quirk.the missile is going to give it away anyway but we don't even know all the tricks the f-22 has up its sleave if im not mistaken a lot of it is still classified.
renegadekav 1 year ago
@renegadekav Only it's top speed
mrfrankincense 1 year ago
@mrfrankincense im not so sure.things like all its radar capability and of course how the technology works.there is a bit more to be released I think but why would we yet?a suitable rival has not arrived yet.
renegadekav 1 year ago
@mrfrankincense It's top speed is Mach 2.4
F16V1PER 1 year ago
@F16V1PER
That's the "advertized" speed. Do you believe it? I don't. I'd wager it is closer to or slightly above Mach 3.0
GreyGeek77 1 year ago
@GreyGeek77 The F-22 (and most modern "stealth" fighters)' "S" type air intakes have a great increase in drag when getting close to mach two so I doubt that the Raptor or the Pak FA surpass mach two by more than .4.
Stover36 10 months ago
/watch?v=27qdB1D0s9M LOOL its funny how somehow foreign countries know everything bout US nad what is does and what/how its aircraft operate...........just like they knew that obamas trip to asia costed over 200million a day or 2billion a week LOOL
TH7596 1 year ago
@TH7596 Yeah, but they don't work in the aviation community and rely on out of context sensationalist news reports.
Eagle1oh7 1 year ago 7
@TH7596 you are a silly partisan hack. Please document your "$200 MILLION A DAY" claim.. If you can't, or if it's lush dumbaugh, don't waste your breath.
kenfo0 5 months ago
8,000 trillion dollars
msalak87 1 year ago
were are people getting 300 billion dollars from?
Inklebonker1 1 year ago
A little out of my budget...
Maybe I could afford a flashing light for a few thousand?
jamesdstudent 1 year ago
How much can I get one for on eBay?
jamesdstudent 1 year ago
@jamesdstudent 300 billion.
cutty02 1 year ago
@jamesdstudent 300 million.
cutty02 1 year ago
lucky there wasnt any sky divers near the jet eh?
zack6sw 1 year ago
That was fast for F-22 to fire AIM-120 most aircraft firing missiles to slow to hit their targets.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
Sinister!
EquinoxParadox91 1 year ago
At that speed he's lucky the missile fell away from the jet.
Afrocanuk 1 year ago
@Afrocanuk The missile would've fallen away just as fast if he'd been flying 10,000 mph.
teejfalconaf 1 year ago
a question i've always had: since the f-22 is stealth does that mean it cannot be shot down by a radar guided missle?
sonofrock97 1 year ago
@sonofrock97 Not exactly,Its cross signature shows up on radar as the size of a bird,But Russia has some pretty advanced SAMs and I wouldnt send an F-22 to attack them anytime soon
tossingmidgetsforfun 1 year ago
Inverted, and firing an Aim 9 is outside the envelope...
schicktd 1 year ago
@schicktd Not anymore. They solved that problem by having all internal racks equipped with hydraulic arms, which shove the missile away from the plane. Inverted or not, the raptor has teeth
DirectInjected 1 year ago
@DirectInjected Yeah,That might be the case...In a video game...there's a Big distinction in the real world....Until i see it happen....I'm going take your words with a grain of salt...There's always been some sort of actuator to push the bomb of rocket away from the aircraft...Be it CAD or Hydraulic as you explained...Not in a purely inverted position though...
schicktd 1 year ago
lol, video is clearly sped up.
Hatinonthehaters 1 year ago
@Hatinonthehaters actually it isnt
th3asianator 1 year ago
Damn, the F 22 is one bad mutha, I would hate to come up against it in a fire fight
mankind2112 1 year ago
wow! it's fast.
TENJHOTENGE1 1 year ago
F-22 always wins.
SangheiliSniper11 1 year ago 20
@SangheiliSniper11 unless it fights the senate lol! F-22 is dead, long live the Superhornet
Ltmoney 1 year ago
@SangheiliSniper11 but never fought... ;)
bingofioul 1 year ago
@SangheiliSniper11 apparently not. in simulated air war with china and russia, the F22, F35 and F18 superhornet werent as good as the russians aircraft.
stephenpprice 11 months ago
@stephenpprice and we all know computer games are the most accurate way to determine this...
SangheiliSniper11 11 months ago
@SangheiliSniper11 depends on who writes the program. If I work for lockhead wanna bet lockhead wins or if i work for mig to continue my employment I wouold bet they win. at least till the next modell is available.
in the real world the mig 29 didn't do so well and yet on paper they were supposed to be better.
123456789mischief 9 months ago
@stephenpprice
You realize that in those kinds of contests countries tone down their avionics and equipment so the other doesn't know the capability?
For us it's called underestimation.
LgndryThndr 9 months ago
@SangheiliSniper11 F-22 ceased production. Loses by default.
SnuggeryBuggery 9 months ago
@SnuggeryBuggery
>Implying production couldn't be picked up at any time of choosing
>Implying we even have any one worthy of using the F22 on.
Our F15's seem to fuck everyone elses shit just fine.
LgndryThndr 9 months ago
@SnuggeryBuggery every plane has a limit on production, do you think countries just make them nonstop? fucking idiot
AdverbAdjective 9 months ago
@SangheiliSniper11 what is your opinion for SU-35 BM/S ?
christos200 9 months ago
@christos200 Good aircraft, it does lack a reduced radar cross section though, in terms of russian aircraft I think the SU-47 was the best, I'm not the biggest fan of the SU-35 or PAK-FA
SangheiliSniper11 9 months ago
@SangheiliSniper11 the su-35 bm/s has 3 radars. and one facing back. it can also backfire those r-27 missiles. the one radar does search on the x-band(if i'm not mistaken) which makes the f22 vissible on great distances. it is the latest version. i like the F-22 but the su-35bm/s was builted as an Anti-F22 fighter. and the su47 whas just a show plane . only 2 where builded
christos200 9 months ago
@christos200 xband doesn't pick up the F-22, It's still in development. The BM docent serve as a decent anti-f-22 aircraft, no aircraft can. The PAK-FA is still being built, the SU-47, the only match for the F-22, was never built. The Russian aviation ministry classified it a test aircraft but you should know that when it was in test phase it was an armed aircraft. The Russian aircraft still lacks an "anti-F-22" aircraft. If you're thinking low band radar, that still cant pick up the F-22.
SangheiliSniper11 9 months ago 5
@SangheiliSniper11 Do you happen to know why the SU-47 never made it to production? I find it to be one of the most beautiful fighters ever built, although, I still love the F-22!
HelpfulHow2s 2 months ago
@HelpfulHow2s Cost, it was too expensive.
SangheiliSniper11 2 months ago
It`s called momentum...
vladvladSM 1 year ago
fuck u asshole its a fake look how fast the raptor is and the rocket is at the same place -___- fuckin dickhead :P
STRYKER1467 1 year ago
@STRYKER1467 its momentum, if you had any brains you would realise that anything inside a moving object has the same speed, thats why when your in a car you only get pressed against the seat when it accelerates but not when its moving, that's also why if you threw a ball out of the window it would be traveling at the same speed at the car you dipshit. dont make factual assumptions unless you know the facts yourself fcktard
maplestorym0bs 1 year ago
@STRYKER1467.... Even by the low standards of you tube.... You are a fucking moron.
Fromanttodugong 1 year ago
@STRYKER1467 Learn some physics you little girl. anything inside the F22 would be moving at the same momentum, so when it is dropped out and is rocket propelled forward, it would gain even more momentum, going faster than the F22. Maybe you should try thinking before typing, dumbass.
LiveAndLetDie222 1 year ago
@LiveAndLetDie222
What your saying is correct with regards to physics although this does look fake. That missile accelerated way too quick to look real lol.
29Gixxer 1 year ago
@29Gixxer The AIM-120's rocket gives an awesome thrust. Still it looks fake... even the F-22 looks fake... How can a plane be so... Raptor...
Stover36 1 year ago
@Stover36
Yeah upon having a second look...it's probably just speeded up.
29Gixxer 1 year ago
@LiveAndLetDie222 when its dropped, out of the plane, it has to go twice as fast as the plane, as shown in the video. that seems like a remarkable speed for a missle to be going. im not saying its fake or anything, but iv never seen anything like that
SkullakaAce 1 year ago
@STRYKER1467
Thats too dumb to not reply to this , but it all been already said...
moicced 1 year ago
F-35 JSF has one engine for both variants the VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing for all the noobs out there) and the standard variant
grome333 1 year ago
i hate to say it, but i dont think thats an F22, it could be the F-35 joint strike fighter. Im not sure, just my oppinion. ^_^
GunnyMongoose 1 year ago
@GunnyMongoose I was wrong, its an F22, i checkd my sources. Either way, id hate to be on the recieving end of that missle.
GunnyMongoose 1 year ago 2
each aim120 costs $386 000
usa has money to waste
Lenangreal 2 years ago
@Lenangreal
it doesnt tho, have you seen the amount of $trillions the US national debt is? theres no way to recover from that amount debt yet the amount spent each year on the military is vast.
bad times ahead for the US, its consuming itself to ruin.
ChuckMamuck 1 year ago
there is a way, the debt we "owe" is to the federal reserve. which is corrupt we all know that
truegwbfan 1 year ago
@truegwbfan
what is the way? national debt of approx $15 trillion, growing by $4 billion a day since 2007. public debt equalling $40 thousand per person.
there only seems to be ron paul addressing it. us debt held by foreigners is high, esp china and japan, the world currency is dollars, the oil standard is (petro)dollars but the producers are talking about change to euro's, Iraq did and look what happened there, Iran are doing the same thing. unstable dollar fucks the world. not looking good
ChuckMamuck 1 year ago
@truegwbfan
im not getting at the US, i spent most life in the US but live in europe now. im concerned, the fed is dodgy but thats just 1 of many, america was a great special country but its being destroyed under our feet, it just seems to be a platform now for the wealthy elite to get more wealth, power and play war games on the world for control of the planet without giving a shit about the consequences to the country and the american people. americans are wising up rapidly tho which is good.
ChuckMamuck 1 year ago
Well there goes 3/4 of my house.
rminb010204 1 year ago 24
@rminb010204 more like you entire house, and your neighborhood.
bobbillgeorge20 1 year ago
@rminb010204 there goes all of my trailer...
hastyhoegaarden 1 year ago
@rminb010204 looool...exactly
GreatRedTiger 11 months ago
@rminb010204 there goes my house, car, and everything else I own.
bunny153649 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake lol
STRYKER1467 2 years ago
its not fake dumbass. are you like 5 years old how is it fake its a fucking airplane shooting a missle
Blackblade22100 1 year ago
lol awsome!
victoria3552 2 years ago
Langweilig
127bond 2 years ago
lol, its about a military jet not a invasion.. o well we and our allies would just push them back and kill them on their own turf ;)
cscmole 2 years ago
Pentagon does not let a program get cutback, it is Congress who dictates spending by pentagon/ all military.
gothenburgmark 2 years ago
i dont realy care all about your arguments all car is that the f22 is an awesome looking plane and its sweet
higgybaby1239876 2 years ago
Yet another demonstration of how alien technology contributes to American superiority.
phidelt08 2 years ago
For the amount of research money spent on developing the F22, the US could have just purchased Russia.. Again.. XD
texNoz 2 years ago
A poor pilot in the SU-37 would be dead before he ever new a F-22 was even in the area! Stealth is the major factor in a real life battle between these planes.
dgunsnfun 2 years ago
So the missile goes faster than the plane.
eviltwin777 2 years ago
Starscream!
Foromir27 2 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
Hahahaha!!!!!!!!
Do you think this jet "invisible" with open "doors"? :]
Try to shoot rocket in "upside down" position.
Try to shoot not-aim120 - such a Sidewinder.
Try to drop a bomb like JDAM :]
Craptor sucks.
Flashrahhh 2 years ago
The only thing that sucks here is your english, mate.
Have you ever actually heard of a bombing mission that requires the plane to fly upside down
Or how likely is it that the pilot of the f22 will be in a vantage point and able to fire an Aim 9 in a dogfight, while he is upside down.
That might be a problem, IF the missile wouldnt be extended out of the bay, and indeed out of the fuselage to allow its IR- seeker to get a wiff of the plane its being fired at.
rdrivers679 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
HAHA :]
Dickhead, don't teach me your scum's language :]
If it will be real airwar - you should shut your mouth.
I think every Su-35BM will rape at least 50 Craptors. And each PAK FA will rape 500 Craptors. :]]]]]]]
So fuck off and die.
Flashrahhh 2 years ago
Haha, first of all, I'm not even english... nor am I Russian.
Just laying the facts on the table, wich I suggest you start doing aswell, just once you get that head pulled out of your ass.
rdrivers679 2 years ago 3
rofel at any russian heap of shit getting anywhere near an f22
eowdevastator 2 years ago
Man that dude has some serious problems..lol peole like that shouldnt comment
jtlovett27 2 years ago 2
man you crazy as hell, I'll wait till a RAPTOR bombs your backyard, and then we'll see what sucks. The Raptor owns everything
narutodemonfoxnaruto 2 years ago
PAK FA doesn't exist. So far the only thing that rapes is the Raptor because it is real. Besides the Raptor was developed in the 90's. Its design is almost 20 years old and the Russians are finally developing something that MIGHT come close. But years later.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago 5
SU-47 featured some of tech a F-22 has. Russia wasn't able to continue development due to the '90s economy collapse but they have a plan designed it's just undergoing testing.
eviltwin777 2 years ago 2
SU-47 is a demonstration jet. You build a demonstration jet to test new technologies in real world. The SU-47 will never be a production jet. It's similar to the US x jet program.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago 2
Yes and on that jet was RAM, the very thing that makes the F-22 stealthy(n' shape). It also had 3D thrust vectoring which the F-22 doesn't have. Then again it's a ex aircraft but you never now. Also Russia has a history of releasing their aircraft after the competitor did, to cheat of em'.
eviltwin777 2 years ago
The Russians will never be able to afford a stealth fighter. For every hour the Raptor flies it costs $40,000+ plus to maintain due to the stealth coating. Our military budget it more than the worlds combined. Even if the Raptor is the greatest fighter ever made I bet we have something better not released. Thats why the pentagon allowed the program to be cut back.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
Yeah i know they won't make as much just like right now.
eviltwin777 2 years ago
We shall easily destroy F-22 Technologies a stealth have invented in Russia!
bkrru 2 years ago
Stealth was not invented in Russia. A Russian scientist developed mathmatical equations that helped design stealthy shapes but the Russians never developed anything from it.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago 2
What difference does that make?
IauthenticI 2 years ago
It makes a huge difference. The Russian military did not develop stealth. The US took all the knowledge of stealth and created the first viable stealth aircraft.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
Actually, the Germans invented it by mistake.
The Horten Ho 229 Flying Wing was difficult to track on radar during flight tests.
VigilanteAgumon 2 years ago
Yeah they came across it but it was unintended. Wasn't the main reason for the flying wing to reach America?
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
The 229 was a jet fighter.
VigilanteAgumon 2 years ago
Yeah I know but the main reason for building a flying wing was a test bed for the Amerika bomber.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
@disturbedone5009 german scientists first developed stealth planes in ww2.... but the usa deffently perfected the design durring the cold war
101andrewj 2 years ago
They developed the flying wing design which in inherently stealthy. I have never heard or read anything that says they were purposely trying to find a design that avoids radar.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
@101andrewj well yeah the germans wer just starting to figure it out.... unfortunitly the germans wer defeated and the americans stole a bunch of there top nazi scientists.... but if the germans wer givin more time.... like if they won ww2... they deffently would have been the first to build a complete stealth plane.... altho the first was designed to scatter radar beams and was made of wood 2 obsorb some of the radar
101andrewj 2 years ago
@101andrewj ya I saw that on Discovery channel... btw the only reason for USA having that kind of Army is cuz every single European scientist goes there >.>
kolesztar 2 years ago
@disturbedone5009 Russian and Germany pretty much invented a lot of things that changed the world. I wouldn't be surprised if they did. But you're right russia ran out of money after that none of what they came up with went anywhere.
supramanz 1 year ago
But we Americans actually are your friends, albeit not close, and we are not at war with you. In fact, we are both invested in the International Space Station, working together for the common good. True, Lockheed took the scientific paper written by a Russian, and applied it to develop stealth technology / F/A-117. There is far more to the F-22 than just stealth - supercruise, AESA radar, avionics, integration with other systems in the theater of operations, ...
MusicalFan1701 2 years ago
i dont see why the pentagon and congress spend so much damn money anymore, we have the worlds largest military, and the only enemies were bound to face are those of terrorist groups, north korea may have strained relationships with the US, but i doubt they'll want to go to war with us because they know we can blow them off the map. all this continual military spending is pointless imo -__-
camwizardoz 2 years ago
You can never have a too strong military but you can have a weak military that will allow you to get your ass kicked. Every time we have entered a war with a global power we get our ass kicked until the military gets its shit together. WW1 we didn't have any infantry rifles so we redesigned the Lee Enfield (which we were building for the British. WW2 none of our fighters could hang with the Messerschmidt or Zero. Korea we were getting destroyed by the MiG15.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
but think about it, honestly, look at our military, if you say that its not enough to protect this country, they you have had ur head up your ass for way too long. our military is the largest in the world, and even the next three top militaries combined dont equal our own. Our military, as it is, is more than enough to protect our country, but people just enjoy spending money to come up with new ways to kill people, and thats the shit i dont like nor understand.
camwizardoz 2 years ago
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
hmm i read somewhere that we did have the largest military, must have been a dud. well, you get my point right? its bs that we spend so much when half the countries you listed up there are not hostile. Our military is the most technologically advanced in the world, that you cant deny, so the constant use and purchase of expensive equipment like the raptor is somewhat pointless.
camwizardoz 2 years ago
To me, if were going to spend that much money, at least spend it on something useful and combat tested, like the predator UAV's. I just dont see why a military as strong as ours which has no equal from any of our enemies(technologically) see the purchase and continual funding of projects such as the raptor(even though it has been put on hold) and the newer and larger carriers the navy plans on building. The money used to fund the military could fix a large number of problems this country has.
camwizardoz 2 years ago
If China and N Korea invaded we would be in a world of shit. Most of our military is spread all over the world and the majority of civilians that do have firearms have ones that are ineffective or obsolete tactically.
At this point in time our military is the most technologically advanced yes but that is right now only. Who knows what will come out of Russia or China. The Raptor has no equal in the air right now. That makes it extremely valuable.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
i agree with the fact that the F-22 is a great asset to us, but i dont see an invasion by china or north korea happening because while our country itself has limited manpower, we do have allies and in a situation where we have to wage war on our own soil, i doubt they wouldnt come and help us out. and also, to amass an invasion force to attack us effectively without anyone noticing would be quite the longshot.
camwizardoz 2 years ago 2
. look at D-day, even with the limited recon methods back then, the germans were semi-prepared for the invasion, even though their best fighting forces were stationed further north, the crack panzer divisions and ss stationed at normandy put up quite a fight. and if they did manage to invade, the sheer amount of resources needed to keep the invading army supplied would eventually bite them in the ass, just like the germans.
camwizardoz 2 years ago
even in the worst case scenario of an invasion of our homeland, i have anough faith in the military of this country that i know we'd be able to push them back
camwizardoz 2 years ago
France : 350 000 military activ mate
but anyway USA is a lot higher than 475... easily more than 1 million no ?
( are you speaking about ground army only or ground army + air force + navy ? )
XavierB0126 2 years ago
I think those were for active Army ground troops.
disturbedone5009 2 years ago
Our military is far from the largest in the world. with all our guys, we are nothing more than 600,000 people, reserves included. China has a standing army of over 2.8 MILLION! We are just one of the most advanced.
toolguy1974 2 years ago