The JOOZ apparently didn't like what he was saying too much so they decided to shut off his lights.
It's not the first time it's happened, nor will it be the last.
Just ask Rick Sanchez, Pat Buchanan, Phil Donahue (for pooh-poohing their propaganda in the run up to the Purim 2003 War-For-Israel), and Mel Gibson.
Supporting the legitimacy of our corrupt political system and the mendacious den of political whores who have turned the U.S. into a de facto vassal of AIPAC is an unstated requirement.
If u want Liberty u have to do more then all other People that didnt know who they a realy voting. Explain what Ron Paul will bring back to American People. Good Luck to Americans that Paul wins, otherwise sorry for another 4 bad years
Twitter and Facebook are more addictive than Marijuana just saying. Oh btw I have smoked marijuana for 2 years now and I just recently quit so I could get a job. Haven't touched it in 4 weeks even though I am around it all the time. Another thing I have an addiction to cigarettes I tried quitting multiple times but it just isn't happening. Also I seem to like most 18 year olds have an addiction to my phone...cant go without it. What does cigarettes and phones have in common unlike weed? Death
@RonPaulLikeABoss When I say death from cell phones I mean all the ignorant people that can't wait until they are done driving to text somebody back. There are more deaths from texting while driving than the use of marijuana by far
This video should be titled..."How to get Fox News to fire you in less than five minutes"...thank you Judge, you are a true light in these times of darkness....I support you.
What if the majority of Americans are actually voting for Ron Paul, but the numbers of the election primaries lie simply because it's a fixed election. Do we realize this? Is it a coincidence that the majority of the internet promotes Ron Paul, while the media, electoral college, and power-hungry officials promote otherwise to the public. (Because what people say on the internet is not really fixed). What if we are being lied to when this has already been according to 'their' plan.
@ TwinSmoke. The bottom line is, you don't have the right to tell people that they are not allowed to ruin there life. Are you going to start regulating the food that we eat because obesity can ruin our life. This is about freedom and personal responsibility.
By the way, I smoke every day. I don't hurt anyone and I take care of all my responsibilities. There is no reason I should be considered a criminal for what I do in the privacy of my home when no other party is affected by my actions.
@TwinSmoke First of all, Weed is NOT ADDICTIVE, if you stop smoking weed nothing will happen to your body unlike cigarettes and other drugs. People smoke weed because they like it not because they need it. Second, If your gonna talk about "Gateway Drugs" then you have to mention Nicotine and Alcohol, both of which are addictive. Third, Ron Paul wants to get rid of the federal government and its laws, by doing so, he return power to the state, the states would then choose to legalize or not...
@NanaDontDie First of all, weed IS addictive to those with addictive personalities. If you stop smoking cigarettes, the worst thing you have to worry about is weight gain. Second, nicotine and alcohol are NOT gateway drugs. I'd like to know where you got that one ROFL!! Third, if Paul was president, why have a federal governent at all? We could get rid of all 3 branches of government. Paul would have the easiest presidency ever.
This nomination process is proof that we Americans cannot think for ourselves. We hear someone pretty say, "isolationist" and like a bunch of parrots we caw, "isolationist, isolationist!". RP believes in supporting our allies by not subsidizing their enemies and trading with those who will trade fairly with us. How is that isolationist? RP wants to legalize all drugs. Really? Say it again parrot! RP wants to decriminalize nonviolent users and let the States determine it's own laws. And
i can't understand ,is American people are stupid!? how can they not vote for this man?? I see all the comments are from different contries all over the world ,but not america.Do you prove that you are dumb as hell? i mean Senator wants to save this world ..the 3rd warld war is approaching us..Please vote for him...
he left out what if the elections were rigged, what if ron paul has no intention of winning, what if he's another corporate shill, put there to give libertarians and constitutionalists false hope, and what if, what if the only way america could get its republic back, was by overthrowing the pariahs by force, trying and excuting criminals like ben shalom bernank, and rahm emanuel, obama and bush, the founding fathers of america would have revolted for a lot less.
"What if this is happening again?" It never stopped happening! Everything he's talking about has been going on nonstop for DECADES. Politicians make promises and make promises to get elected and don't keep ANY of them. EVER.
George Orwell wrote 1984 which I read in high school. The most shocking point in that book was that the government ran EVERYTHING including the opposition.
Why doesn't Judge Napoletano run for President as a third party candidate and implement real constitutional government, if elected? This guy has the guts to tell it like it is but would be totally misrepresented by the lame stream media if he were to run. He has the power of persuasion to attract the ordinary people because he is a real opinion leader but the billionaire owned news media would have a field day tearing him down. The billionaires own most of the other presidential candidates.
Judge Andrew Napolitano, he's onto them. Ever notice the more tax you have to pay, the bigger the government's debt grows? Congress, with impunity, passing unconstitutional laws, rampant insider trading, gross criminal activity. There is only one recourse when a government has reached this point. Citizens - load 'em and stand ready to defend your very freedom.
Food for thought, if the Federal Government needed the 18th Amendement to prohibit the sale, manufacture and distribution of intoxicating liquors (alcohol), how is it that the government can ban any other substance?
It seems even in the hey-day of progressivism the progressives couldn't even phathom such a leap of power without going through the proper legal channels.
I'll pitch in here. It is only a suggestion that the Founders were deists. The only one who I atleast, have ever been able to truly pinpoint as a deist was Jefferson, and even then, his moral beliefs (Jefferson Bible) guided his policy making along with the Constitution.
@socomfan555 To say America was not founded on Judeo-Christian principals is incorrect though. Deism does not reject moralism, simply the notion any god is constantly interfering with the world.
The United States has maintained many Judeo-Christian laws up unitl the 1960s when supreme Court decided to build on 19th-20th century progressivism and basically made stuff up using the 14th Amendment and the Commerce clause while simultaneously ignoring the 9th Amendment.
Ron Paul is the only real choice, and it's a damn shame that most Americans lack the logic and intelligence to see that. Without the big changes Paul proposes, this country is in grave danger of entering into another war and eventually defaulting on our debts making the great depression look like a walk in the park. WAKE UP, PEOPLE. The government is currently made up of a homogenous mixture of self-serving politicians who are oblivious to the real issues! VOTE RP, and help rescue America!
@sisgp1 You know I was always questioning the fact that a guy as open as this judge is on FOX NEWS but you say his show has been cancelled? I had no idea, though it all makes sense now...my opinion of Fox News stands firm I suppose.
What the... Did I realllly just see a Fox News video I at least mostly agreed with? I'm not really on the same page as Ron Paul on economic/labour related ideas. I'm a Left-Libertarian/Social-Anarchist, myself... But I do agree with the Libertarian critique of the state. And Dr. Paul does seem to be scaring the shit out of the establishment, and that's always a good thing to see in my books.
I wish more people would stand up and have the guts to admit Ron Paul is our Last BEST Hope! The media has done a grave injustice, by ignoring him all together. WAKE UP Everyone and don't let us continue down Either Party's hand fed Crap to us. The clearest definition of Insanity Is,........doing the same thing over & over again and expecting different results ! This has been going on since Nixon, and will continue until there is no more USA ! Lets start a Fresh new era>> VOTE RON PAUL !
its funny for me(a swedish man) to see how the media treats Ron Paul, its EXACTLY how our media treated SD(The Swedish Democrats)...No actually Swedish media was 10times worse, but its the same thing in a lower degree.
@yfz450mane, maybe you should look up Iraq dimwit. 20,000 permenant duty troops are still there, not to mention the 50,000 or so Private Contracted security forces that the Taxpayer is footing the bill on, at over 100,000 dollars a year a piece. When were you in Iraq? Since you know so much about the country. Ron Paul wants to bring every last soldier home from every part of the world! Do you people even comprehend what that means? It means we would stop bullying every other nation on earth.
@lifeisgood070 actually, bush bailed out the banks, look it up, it was called the TARP fund. And which president sent us to Iraq for wmd's? Bush. Who ended it? Obama. Why is it fair to support Israel over its neighbors? It may not be, but america supports israels democratic government over its neighboring dictators, just like we support south korea, and supported south vietnam.
Ron Paul is just another actor in the scripted drama. He is a liar,deceiver, cheat and thief.He is the greatest one so far and has all of you fooled. He is brought to you by the same people who have placed these other limited candidates and he is just playing the role they have assigned him. I agree with everything else in this video except his views on RP.
@lioner2 Liar deciever cheat? Any facts to back that up? 4 the last 30 yrs hes been by far the most consistent to his word & no one can find any dirt on him 'cause he lives his life purely, I study him fairly regularly. Do some homework b4 u mislead others. If he were to get in office he'd get assassinated by the establishment 'cause of his pure libertarian beliefs, the FED wont let it happen, and instead of tarnishing his reputation they ignore him in the media because that's all they can do!
@Lonsterlmfu I have some facts for you. RP has recently been endorsed by Stormfront, the KKK and David Duke. When RP was asked to return the money he'd gotten from them, he refused. RP is running on the GoP ticket even though ALL of his views are liberal except for fiscal representation. He doesn't stand a chance. It should be obvious by now seeing as how he places in dead last in every state. RP says he's not an racist, but says that if Israel was attacked with nukes, we wouldn't get involved.
@TwinSmoke Is anything you said worse than a candidate who gave banks trillions of dollars, started and continued wars without public approval, endorses the assassination, imprisonment and torture of his own citizens, and grabs power whenever possible?
Who cares if the KKK endorsed Paul? The previous KKK grand wizard graduated from my highschool. idc if they hate blacks. But I care when someone kills my fellow Americans. And that is what Obama is doing. The kkk hardly does that now.
@lifeisgood070 The American people are fickled. In our wars with Afghanastan and then Iraq, the people overwhemingly supported the wars at first. Therefor, public approval was there. As far as "assassination, imprisonment and torture". That is a bunch of crap. We use that against alqaeda, alqaeda supporters and those that harbor al qaeda. You should really study these things you preach about.
I care that white supremists support Paul. It tells me all I need to know about the guy.
@TwinSmoke Also... I'm not a racist or against freedom of religion... but have you read a fucking book on Israel? The UK and other nations created this fake Jewish nation in the middle. How is favoring one group (jews) over another (islams) morally fair at all? That region has been at war with itself for 1000's of years. And honestly, I could care less about what a bunch of seemingly stuck up Jewish people think is their god given right. Let them fight for it. Stop killing Americans.
@lifeisgood070 I DO favor Jews over islamists. Have you ever read the quran? I've read parts of it. The quran talks all through it about killing ANYONE that does not worship islam. If you'd like, I can provide quotes for you and links.
@TwinSmoke He can't choose who endorses him, I'll look in2 the KKK,David Duke info, I remain skeptical, He's a Libertarian constitutionalist.Hello? It's vital we get back 2 respecting it. Its what makes this nation great. He doesn't stand a chance only because he's a threat to the elitists bankers/FED and therefore he is ignored in the media. He isn't a racist and your follow up to the reason you think he is one doesn't explain your point Nor did u support ur accusations of him being a liar
@Lonsterlmfu First of all, I never said he was a liar. Someone else did. But here is a few link for you. Even shows Paul in a picture with white supremists. newsone.c o m/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-10-racist-ron-paul-friends-supporters/
Paul is NOT ignored in the media. He's had just as much airtime as everyone else. But you Paul supporters like to use that as an excuse.
Him not standing a chance has NOTHING to do with bankers. He is a LIBERAL running on the GoP ticket!!!!!!
@TwinSmoke I 100% disagree W/u he's a LIBERTARIAN. A consistent one. & I have attentively watched EVERY 1 of the debates, up 'til lst night he was definitely ignored in the debates! Hve u been paying attention at all? I watch Fox/CNN everyday, listen 2 it political programs on XM. Do research online, He has most definitely been ignored no rational denying that. Also, he IS a threat to the big banks and the FED. LOL!! Elevate your thinking please you clearly don't get the point.
@Lonsterlmfu Oh I most certainly do get the point. All Paul ever says is that everything is the feds fault. El Nino, the Earthquakes around the world, whatever. It's all the feds fault. Paul has NO CLUE how to create jobs. He doesn't know how to run our military. Just because he was a flight surgeon, who cares? He never even shot a gun in the military. He never commanded any troops. And I don't really watch the news. I don't feel the need to be indoctrinated. I reasearch everything on my own.
@TwinSmoke He is a veteran and a doctor, None of the other candidates up there have ever fought for this country! At least the man served! Romney has what? 5 sons?? All of which have not enlisted or fought for this country!
@Lonsterlmfu Oh give me a break. Ron Paul wasn't even drafted as he claims. And he was a FLIGHT SURGEON for crying out loud. He has NO CLUE what goes on on the front lines. He's never been there. I don't care for Romney too much. But I do like Santorum and Gingrich. With Santorum, we'd finally have religion again and with Newt, noone can out debate him. He is a historian. I'm a veteran too. Does that qualify me to run for the presidency? It takes so much more.
@SirUncleCid Then go to hell? That's your only alternative. If that's what you truly want, have at it. But thank you. I always knew Paul wasn't religious and you just proved my point.
@SirUncleCid Funny. All of our founding fathers made decisions based on religion. That's who Paul is trying to speak for. But he cannot. He does not side with them on religious issues. Paul is a fraud. Period.
@TwinSmoke Nah, they just knew that humans cannot take away "God given rights". And you're just an idiot. How are you going to make decisions based on religion... when there are now plenty of religions. They'd conflict all day. Keep the race war going, says TwinSmoke!
@SirUncleCid Which God given rights u are talking about mate..Go ask those dying of hunger in Africa or in many parts of the world about God given rights.. Rights are just privileges and whats funny is they are not the same every where u go around the world. Every country has different rights than the next country and if they were God given rights than God would've been making sure u got a plate of food, drinking water, no rapes etc etc.
@BIGVHRIS32 I used quotations mostly to signify that I was joking. I don't believe in God. I don't believe in Heaven, Hell. We are soulless creatures like the rest of them. And yeah, lol, this God guy definitely doesn't like Africa... At all.
@BIGVHRIS32 Are you dumb?.. Notice how in all these cases rights are taken away. You have the right to speak unless another person takes the right from you. People starving in Africa are starving because of oppression, not because food doesn't exist. Are you going to tell me there is no such thing as food in Africa?..
The amazing irony of this is that it's your atheist lunatic friends who oppressed the Africans to begin with, thinking them to be sub human... Fuck you. You're retarded.
@SirUncleCid So, Paul likes to bring up our founding fathers when it suits him. But when it comes to religion, he'll give our founding fathers the shaft. Ok, I got it. Thanks for clearing that up.
@TwinSmoke I am not Ron Paul. Stop associating my views with his. Apparently religion = government, visa versa, to you. If anything, I think Paul is more respectful to the founding fathers than any of the other candidates.
@SirUncleCid You are sticking up for loser Paul. Therefor you must atleast share his phylosophy. You really think Paul is more respectful to the founding fathers? Do you feel that the founding fathers that found this nation as a Judeo Christian nation would agree with legalizing narcotics, prostitution and gay marriage? You think they would agree with abandoning our allies? No, they most certainly wouldn't. Better think twice before including our founding fathers and Paul in the same sentence.
@TwinSmoke Our founding father did abandon our ally France! Washington warned us against foreign alliances,and Adams fought a Quasi-war against France because we refused to acknowledge our alliance with them in their war against England.
Our Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights for a reason. The first Amendment prevents the ability to create a nation religion and to prevent the abrigement free exercise of religion.
Many of the founders were deists. Also, look up JohnDickinson
@socomfan555 France has NEVER really been an ally of ours. The only reason they made friends with us to begin with is so that we could give their country back to them after they surrendered it.
@TwinSmoke France and the United States had a loose alliance after the revolutionary war. France called upon the United States to aid it in its war against Great Britain, and I believe it was Adams who refused, leading to the Quasi-War.
Sir, I'm not even American, but even I know the US wasn't founded upon Christianity or Judaism or any religion. A lot of the Founding Fathers were Deists.
They were for liberty which would include legalization of Drugs.
“Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth & protection of the country.” -Thomas Jefferson
And they were pretty Non-interventionist as well. They didn't want anything to do with foriegn wars that weren't any of their own buisness. How do you not know this?
@SolarFireflies LOL! This nation WAS founded as a Judeo Christian nation. It's not suprising to hear someone that's not even an American say what you said. As far as Jefferson's quote. Pot wasn't made illegal untill 1937 and wasn't made a controlled narcotic untill 1970. Our founding fathers would NOT allow legalization of narcotics including heroin, PCP, meth. If you're going to be a foreigner posting here, you better study up. You clearly don't have a clue.
@TwinSmoke Dude, I'm sorry, but you are such a fucking idiot. You should be asking questions about why things are the way they are instead of giving close-minded explanations for important issues that require close and logical examination to truly understand. I know you're ignorant mind will just get angry as it tries to process intelligence so I will say no more, but I really hope you're only in the 10th grade or something because you've got a lot of growing up to do, buddy.
@daytonlax34 LOL! It's hillarious how you tell me to grow up ROFL!! I don't have to curse to get a point across. I also am obviously WAY more educated than you. I've served this country. I've graduated college twice. What have you done lately? Whine, bitch and moan would be my guess. I'm also guessing that you've never opened a book or done ANY KIND of research LOL! I don't even have to work hard with you. You make yourself look like a moron. Keep up the good work.
And how exactly was the US, where it had a core belief for "freedom of religion," founded upon just one religion? You can tell me it was founded on religious principles but on a specific religion? No.
If you're saying Pot wasn't made illegial until 1937 then you're saying Pot was legal before that time, so what exactly is your point? Doesn't seem like they minded drugs being legal. How exactly do you know they'd be against meth, etc?
@SolarFireflies I can't believe you don't understand the simiplist of historical facts. This nation WAS founded as a Judeo Christian nation. Even the founding fathers mentioned that. They gave us freedom of religion, freedom of speech and the right to bear arms so that the government could never fully contoll the people.
It took a while to make pot illegal because they didn't know what it was. Just like how they used to put cocaine in Coca Cola.
If the US was founded as a Judeo-Christian nation specifically, then I can see very little Freedom for Religion at work there. Besides, the founding fathers were noted secualrists. So that makes me more inclined to believe America wasn't founded on any specific religion.
-
Why make it illegial in the first place? It should be up to a person what they consume, not the state, and that I know the founders would agree with.
@SolarFireflies Every one of our laws comes from the Bible. That right there should tell you who founded this nation. But I will reiterate.... We were given the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to assemble and the right to bear arms so that this nation could never be a communist nation. What don't you get about that?
Sir, with all due respect, if you believe Common Law comes from the Bible, then I have nothing else to say to you, you clearly do not know its history.
...What I really don't get is why you're bringing communism into this now when it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
@TwinSmoke They agreed with slavery, so suck my ass. I think the founding fathers firmly believed do what you want until it impedes on someone else doing what they want. I think people should be able to make their own decisions, but like you, most people are fucking idiots and would make the wrong decision. And our allies? You mean the people we're going to help conquer the world with? Eat dick, forealz.
@SirUncleCid LOL! I laugh at your kindergarden grammar and terms of endearment. As far as our allies, I'm talking about the ones that could be attacked any day. Like South Korea, Poland and Israel. About making the wrong decisions. That's all you. I don't do drugs. I don't need it. So study up buttercup. You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
@SirUncleCid Are you an American? If you are, I'll tell you something about the future of America in the Middle East, and this is from an Arab living in the Middle East. The Egyptian elections will no doubt bring about the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood with an overwhelming majority of votes through parliament. The brotherhood have criticized US politics and want to open talks with Iran...you can probably guess whats next but I think America is gonna sanction Egypt and potentially invade...watch
@SirUncleCid Many of the Founders found slavery to be an attrocious act against humanity. The reason, at least from their letters, that Washington and Jefferson as well as others maintained slaves, is because they knew that they would have a harder time as free black men.
@mpitts87 Really? Can you prove that? I didn't think so. You may be a pothead and can't go a day without it. But as far as I'm concerned, if I want to get high, I just go skydiving. Drug addicts are part of the downfall of America. Congratulations pothead. Get high all you want. But you'll NEVER be able to outsmart me LOL!!
@TwinSmoke do a little research Washington did so did Jefferson, I don't smoke so all your name calling is just showing your stupidity and your lack of an actual argument and also cannabis is not addictive at all.
@mpitts87 LOL! Maybe I didn't tell you, but I've been a paramedic for 19 years and a nurse for 11. I know WAY more than you do about any drug out there. Cannabis is just as addictive as cigarettes if you smoke enough of it. And then some because cannabis gets you high and cigarettes don't. Therefor, there are MANY out there that may not have a physical addiction to it, but they DO have a mental addiction to it. Better study up buttercup. You're way out of your league here.
@TwinSmoke Then please tell me what in cannabis is addictive, and by your logic video games, television, education, and anything else can be addictive if you do it enough. Also emotions are addictive if you take being addicted to something as in you cant control the urge to do it. And just because your a paramedic/nurse means nothing what is your expertise in the nursing field? Prenatal? because your understanding of what constitutes an addict isn't your understanding of healthcare.
@mpitts87 Actually, I've always been in the emergency field. It's what I love. However, there's nothing really good about cannabis. I would suggest you read up. Since I know you probably won't do this on your own, I have a link for you. abovetheinfluence.c o m/facts/drugsmarijuana/?utm_campaign=paid-search&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_content=marijuana&gclid=CLH14Yfuw64CFcGc7QodJnH9VQ
@TwinSmoke I never said there was anything good about it, just simply there is no chemical that can be addictive in it. But obviously you rather just say its bad and not stay on topic. I would of thought you were a liberal by the way you argue.
@mpitts87 Yeah, yeah, yeah. Your liberal comment is ridiculous and I cannot be baited into something that will turn into nothing. By the way, marijuana WAS the topic. But if the last link wasn't good enough, try this one. addict-help.c o m/marijuana.asp. I could go on all day.
@TwinSmoke since you know so much on the subject why do call it marijuana, that name was made up by US propaganda. But back to you staying on topic. If I said that a house is blue and you say that the house is not safe, that's not staying on topic sure we are talking about the same house but not in the same context. Therefore you were not staying on the topic of cannabis's addictive properties or the lack thereof.
@mpitts87 It's well known that those with addictive personalities can and DO get addicted to pot. I have friends that smoke that crap all the time even though I haven't smoked it in 19 years. I've seen many that went from pot to cocaine or acid. Therefor, it IS a gateway drug. ANYONE that wants to legalize that crap can't be that intelligent.
@TwinSmoke So you`re saying that you need those laws in order to "stay away" from those drugs... LOL you`re like: omg they are going to legalice heroin now i`m going to be an addict :O LOL
@magicthunder666 If you don't have your own mind, you're not worth my time. It's comical to see Paul supporters do nothing but quote Mr. Paul. But I just noticed your handle. So, between the fact that you can't do anything but quote Paul and you're a satanist, that's really all I need to know.
@TwinSmoke LOL you`re obviously incapable of answering the most pragmatic argument and you`re trying to deviate the main point in order of avoid the fact that you don`t have a real answer for it... so cut the "ad nominem" fallacies for a second (you`re not arguing agains the the idea, but you`re deviating the argument to attack ME as a person to disguise you`re own lack of arguments)... LOL
@magicthunder666 First of all, you never ASKED a question genius. Secondly, you have YET to say anything that has to do with the topic at hand. Thirdly, I haven't "attacked" you. I merely stated the obvious facts. But you still have YET to ad anything to this conversation. You are speaking incoherantly and you're off in your own little world. But you could always pray to Satan. I'm sure he'll give you something worth while to ad to this.
@TwinSmoke omf lol XD i`ve never said anything about a "question" (quote me if you can), but i do took a posture and made an argument, that you so far have been incapable of giving an answer for.. instead of that you`re using ad-nominem fallacies to disguise you`re own lack of arguments (how cheap is that?) LOL very lame indeed.
*Do you need those laws in order to "stay away" from those drugs?
*would you become an heroin addict if the law agains it dissapear?
@magicthunder666 You know, maybe you should try being a paramedic. I bet your thoughts would change then. I've SEEN what happens to people on that crap. So, since I've been a paramedic for 19 years and used to work in Miami Florida. I'll consider this an education for you. You clearly have not seen what I have. But in your last post, you said "you`re obviously incapable of answering the most pragmatic argument". If pragmatic argument isn't a question, why should I answer?
@TwinSmoke LOL this is way too easy,(lets just ignore how you obviously don`t know the difference betwen giving an answer to a question and giving an answer to an argument, so lets carry on), ok, now your falling in to an "honor by association fallacy":
premise (A) = you are a paramedic
premise (B) = you've seen what happens to drug addicts
A+B = C (your argument)
(C) = as i`m a paramedic and I've seen what happens to drug addicts, people need laws to keep them away from drugs LMFAO
@magicthunder666 It's becoming clear to me now that you could care less about anyone but yourself. I, on the other hand, care about everyone. I hate to see people destroy their lives and their families lives because of drugs. But if you think a drug addict doesn't harm anyone else by using, I can prove you wrong all day. Your theory about drug use is completely invalid. You don't have the education or knowledge to beat me on this topic. But let's continue anyway.
@TwinSmoke XD still using ad hominem fallacies to disguise your own lack of arguments agains my ideas LOL, don`t you see how pathetic that is?... let me show you:
premise (A)= you don`t care about anyone but yourself.
premise (B)= I care about everyone
A+B= C (what you just said)
(C) = As you don´t care about anyone, but i care about everyone, people need laws to keep them away from drugs LOL
stop evading my questions
would you become an heroin addict if the law agains it dissapear?
@magicthunder666 I wouldn't use drugs under any circumstance. But there are MANY others that would. I mean if it's legal and readily available, then why not try it? Those that do try it will statistically do it again. But you keep worshiping the devil, not caring about anyone but yourself and keep coming up with fruitless points in an otherwise meaningful conversation. You're doing a fantastic job so far.
@TwinSmoke I dislike you very much, so fucking strongly opinionated, you don't even understand drugs would be harder to get if they were regulated, it is WAY easier to get marijuana in high school than alcohol, and that is when you are young and naive. If we regulated drugs, made them legal at age 25, and highly educated everyone on them, I can guarantee that there would not be drug use increase. There is evidence from Holland supporting that. and stats don't show that you will use again?
@rickyp17 I could care less how you feel about me LMAO!! I understand drugs and the ramifications better than you ever will. I used to be one of them. Then I quit and became a paramedic in Miami Florida. Your ignorant thoughts mean nothing to me. I know more about drugs and the effects that they give than you ever will. I have saved numerous lives from overdoses. What have you done lately? If you're atleast not as educated as me, just stop. I'll make you look stupid every single time.
@TwinSmoke Haha, you understand drugs and the ramification better than a former addict? tut oh, your ignorance is showing.. Haha i catch you in a lie as i continue reading quote " i wouldn't do drugs under any circumstance", You think your smart, when you are just straight up bullshitting, you don't make anybody look dumb but yourself, you don't even argue the points other people make against you, you just talk out of your ass.
@rickyp17 You are a complete and TOTAL idiot. allow me to draw in crayon for you what I was telling you since you just can't get it with your feeble mind. Yes, I used to do drugs. No, under any circumstance would I ever do them again. My God you are stupid. I've done them. I've saved those that HAVE done them. What have you done lately? You are clearly an idiot and I have no further use for you. It must suck to be uneducated. But whenever you'd like, I can for sure enlighten you. ROFL. Dumbass.
@TwinSmoke Haha, you will never be able to "enlighten" anyone, when you say, "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance", that say's that i have never done drugs, fucking ANY circumstance, you un-educated, liar, haha what hospital do you work at what degrees do you hold? how do you have so much time for youtube? You haven't saved shit, i've already argued with you on an other account completely about this, you never brought it up. You are bullshitter, get over it.
@rickyp17 Yep, just as I thought. You cannot grasp the simplest of things. LOL!! Saying "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance" does NOT mean "I have never done drugs" you moron. My God you are stupid. But I tell you what. One day, when you're all grown up and you graduate kindergarden, come back and we can continue this discussion. Because as of right now, you've proven over and over again that you don't have the intelligence to keep up with me. ROFL!
@TwinSmoke Haha, Clearly you have a misconception of the english language, it is all good though, because i am a happy, loving, person. Some-what intelligent, haha at the very least intelligent enough to keep up with a lying troll. You know you are lying about saving people, and for the record, you have to say again, or you are saying you have never done drugs, you fucking retard.
@rickyp17 Unlike you, I have a great understanding of the English language. But you actually think you're intelligent when you don't know the difference between "I've used drugs in the past" and "I'll never use them again"? Really? You are comical. Your points are proven invalid and moot at best. But you telling me that I'm lying about saving people. Is that supposed to be an insult? ROFL! I know what I've done with my life which is clearly more than you've ever acheived. Give it a rest.
@TwinSmoke Haha, WOW, first of all you are not acknowledging all the bullshit you have spewed, where are you a doctor, what degree from where? what drugs did you do? how often? How long?, If you had said, "I've used drugs in the past, i'll never use them again" that would make sense, but you can't even acknowledge the FACT, that if you say "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance." Implies that you have and will never do drugs. FUCKING MORON.
@rickyp17 LOL! Your stupidity is amazing. First of all, I'm not a doctor. But I have been a paramedic for 19 years. Secondly, (and this is where your stupidity comes in) me saying that I wouldn't touch drugs under any circumstance in NO WAY IMPLIES that I've never done them in the past. Everything I've stated thus far is grammatically correct. It's not my fault you're not intelligent enough to know that. Everything else you asked is none of your buisness. Must suck to be inferior. LMAO!!
@TwinSmoke Haha, the fact of the matter is you are a troll. Yes it does you fucking idiot, you have to use, either now, or anymore, for it to not imply that. You are literally retarded. If a former drug user "I wouldn't touch drugs under any circumstance", you have to say now, because obviously in your past there were circumstances. Only somebody who has never done drugs can say that. I.e I meet you for the first time, you say that, absolutely implies you have never done them. specify. dickhead.
@rickyp17 LMAO!! I love your terms of endearment. However, on the stupidity scale, you rank at the top. You can't even comprehend the simplist parts of the English language LOL!! I DO NOT have to use now or anymore. You're just too stupid to understand. I could draw it for you in crayon, but something tells me you still won't get it. I mean seriously. As dumb as you are, I can't even believe you'd come here and TRY to debate anyone. You look like an idiot to everyone reading this.
@TwinSmoke Haha, please refer me to this stupidity scale, you know double digits is a low iq right.. You may want to take a test, might put things in perspective for you, and the fact of the matter is i am right. Anybody who can logically think will be on my side. You literally only call me dumb, and never refute anything I say with an actual argument, you are a weak-minded, old, internet troll.
@rickyp17 Yeah, I call you dumb because you clearly are. All you do is come here, curse and belittle anyone that doesn't agree with you. That's pretty childish. But, I've had an IQ test on 3 seperate occasions and it doesn't matter what my IQ is, you'd never believe me anyway. But if you want me to "refute" you cursing because you're not smart enough to post something without cursing, think again. Want to have a serious debate? Then grow up and ask a question worth answering.
@TwinSmoke The drug war is an un-winnable fallacy, surely anyway who understands how corporations lobby/why, understands that.(in this case Pharma and Private-prison)
@TwinSmoke ok in that same argument let make video games illegal because some people may get addicted to them, lets ban cigarettes, alcohol, sex, and anything else that someone could become addicted to. When do you want to take personal responsibility for your own actions and not have someone have to tell you what you should or should not do?
@TwinSmoke Just because your a paramedic for 19 years and a nurse for 11 years does NOT grant you any knowledge about Cannabis. I have ADHD and I used to e on Adderall. Adderal is WAYYYY worse then cannabis. With Adderall I experienced irriatiblity, sleeplessness, loss of appetite (lost 30 pounds while on adderall).
With cannabis, I was able to focus while being able to eat, able to sleep and keep in a positive mood.
@MikeyJTheGreat I will put it to you this way. Basically cannabis impairs your brain function. Here's proof. abovetheinfluence.c o m/facts/drugsmarijuana/?utm_campaign=paid-search&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_content=marijuana&gclid=CLH14Yfuw64CFcGc7QodJnH9VQ
So, I welcome you to research this all you want. I've already done my homework.
@TwinSmoke you just dont get it do you. I dont even smoke weed, but you can't post 'sources' that are blindly anti-weed. I don't see anything factual. It's all opinions and bad experiences.
@TwinSmoke No you didn't, Abovetheinfluence is an organization that is COMPLETEY baised against marijuana. Your brain washed from the propoganda site. That site also says the gateway is real lol. List a real source of info please.
@TwinSmoke THC (Tetrahydracannabinol) regulates things like dopamine and serotonin in the brain so obviously thats why people with ADHD and Depression are prescribed to it. If you worry about a plant, i'd worry more about the phramaceuticals they commonly prescribe to people.
@TwinSmoke Like I said at least he served. We don't just need people on the front lines. I think Gingrich is the most intelligent candidate by far, I'm just weary of his past I can't stand Santorum or the things he stands 4 he's a war hawk extreme opposite of Paul. I'm afraid he'd use his religion 2 dictate/impose his values on America.
@TwinSmoke LOL very Naive response, u don't think with the way Obama hs disregarded separation of church & state (which is not in our constitution!) U don't think that Santorum could impose his extreme Catholic ideals on the country?? Like his anti contraception stance?? LOL I'm done arguing with you you're not quite on the level of objective debating that I thought gawd that response was revealing ..you THINK you know what you're talking about, but you dont'.
@TwinSmoke Another thing, I'm a very objective person, especially right now in the mess we're in, I'm not so sure RP would be the best guy to run this country but when it comes to respecting the constitution auditing the fucked up FED and leaving moral issues out of politics I think he's got it right! You really should stop finding reasons to bash him, he's the most humane relatable person running. Who are you supporting? Owebama??
@Lonsterlmfu Paul doesn't want to audit the fed. He wants to end it. But he has no clue what to do once it's gone. The other 3 candidates want to audit them. RP's ideas are mostly liberal. Allowing states to legalize narcotics, gay marriage and prostitution. Bringing our troops home and abandoning our allies. Especially ones that could be attacked any day like South Korea and Israel. Paul even stated that if Israel gets nuked, we wouldn't get involved. He's an idiot.
@TwinSmoke hey i got one for you....obama was endorsed by the nation of Islam an openly racist group and all he said was that he cant stop ppl from backing him up....how about the fact that our nations support of Israel makes us targets to those that Israel attacks how about RP gets money from American troops than all everyone else put together are you saying their opinions dont matter? it seems to me that u sir are blind to common sinse
Comment removed
everdox 1 hour ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The JOOZ apparently didn't like what he was saying too much so they decided to shut off his lights.
It's not the first time it's happened, nor will it be the last.
Just ask Rick Sanchez, Pat Buchanan, Phil Donahue (for pooh-poohing their propaganda in the run up to the Purim 2003 War-For-Israel), and Mel Gibson.
Supporting the legitimacy of our corrupt political system and the mendacious den of political whores who have turned the U.S. into a de facto vassal of AIPAC is an unstated requirement.
djs259 9 hours ago
RON PAULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
hosank 21 hours ago
Someone else posted this same clip entitled "How to get fired in 5 minutes". lol
.
***** Ron Paul for President 2012 *****
VerumAdNauseam 3 days ago
i like this video...look at the "BLOODLINES"...N.W.O.
TheDamien420 3 days ago
If u want Liberty u have to do more then all other People that didnt know who they a realy voting. Explain what Ron Paul will bring back to American People. Good Luck to Americans that Paul wins, otherwise sorry for another 4 bad years
blacktricky1 3 days ago
@blacktricky1 i say either way, it's all the same government...an complex system.
TheDamien420 3 days ago
Twitter and Facebook are more addictive than Marijuana just saying. Oh btw I have smoked marijuana for 2 years now and I just recently quit so I could get a job. Haven't touched it in 4 weeks even though I am around it all the time. Another thing I have an addiction to cigarettes I tried quitting multiple times but it just isn't happening. Also I seem to like most 18 year olds have an addiction to my phone...cant go without it. What does cigarettes and phones have in common unlike weed? Death
RonPaulLikeABoss 3 days ago
@RonPaulLikeABoss When I say death from cell phones I mean all the ignorant people that can't wait until they are done driving to text somebody back. There are more deaths from texting while driving than the use of marijuana by far
RonPaulLikeABoss 3 days ago
Comment removed
up2space 4 days ago
This video should be titled..."How to get Fox News to fire you in less than five minutes"...thank you Judge, you are a true light in these times of darkness....I support you.
ih8thesheep 4 days ago 13
its funny because its all true!!!
chillinpotato5 5 days ago
What if the majority of Americans are actually voting for Ron Paul, but the numbers of the election primaries lie simply because it's a fixed election. Do we realize this? Is it a coincidence that the majority of the internet promotes Ron Paul, while the media, electoral college, and power-hungry officials promote otherwise to the public. (Because what people say on the internet is not really fixed). What if we are being lied to when this has already been according to 'their' plan.
Specopleader 5 days ago
lol he says 'what if?' as if this is all hypothetical
tbone963 5 days ago 8
@ TwinSmoke. The bottom line is, you don't have the right to tell people that they are not allowed to ruin there life. Are you going to start regulating the food that we eat because obesity can ruin our life. This is about freedom and personal responsibility.
By the way, I smoke every day. I don't hurt anyone and I take care of all my responsibilities. There is no reason I should be considered a criminal for what I do in the privacy of my home when no other party is affected by my actions.
mwalton1845 6 days ago
this is a TOTAL rip off of Ron Paul's "what if" speech. WHAT A MEDIA TOOL!!!! go Ron Paul. not that i dont agree with this speech.
no1wrench 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke First of all, Weed is NOT ADDICTIVE, if you stop smoking weed nothing will happen to your body unlike cigarettes and other drugs. People smoke weed because they like it not because they need it. Second, If your gonna talk about "Gateway Drugs" then you have to mention Nicotine and Alcohol, both of which are addictive. Third, Ron Paul wants to get rid of the federal government and its laws, by doing so, he return power to the state, the states would then choose to legalize or not...
NanaDontDie 1 week ago
@NanaDontDie First of all, weed IS addictive to those with addictive personalities. If you stop smoking cigarettes, the worst thing you have to worry about is weight gain. Second, nicotine and alcohol are NOT gateway drugs. I'd like to know where you got that one ROFL!! Third, if Paul was president, why have a federal governent at all? We could get rid of all 3 branches of government. Paul would have the easiest presidency ever.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
This nomination process is proof that we Americans cannot think for ourselves. We hear someone pretty say, "isolationist" and like a bunch of parrots we caw, "isolationist, isolationist!". RP believes in supporting our allies by not subsidizing their enemies and trading with those who will trade fairly with us. How is that isolationist? RP wants to legalize all drugs. Really? Say it again parrot! RP wants to decriminalize nonviolent users and let the States determine it's own laws. And
RevEasterday 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i can't understand ,is American people are stupid!? how can they not vote for this man?? I see all the comments are from different contries all over the world ,but not america.Do you prove that you are dumb as hell? i mean Senator wants to save this world ..the 3rd warld war is approaching us..Please vote for him...
serg25042008 1 week ago
@TwinSoke Why is gay marriage immoral?
FVAnon 1 week ago
@FVAnon AGENDA 21
TheEnneagram 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he left out what if the elections were rigged, what if ron paul has no intention of winning, what if he's another corporate shill, put there to give libertarians and constitutionalists false hope, and what if, what if the only way america could get its republic back, was by overthrowing the pariahs by force, trying and excuting criminals like ben shalom bernank, and rahm emanuel, obama and bush, the founding fathers of america would have revolted for a lot less.
occultologist 1 week ago
"What if this is happening again?" It never stopped happening! Everything he's talking about has been going on nonstop for DECADES. Politicians make promises and make promises to get elected and don't keep ANY of them. EVER.
TheMeanGreenGoblin 1 week ago
George Orwell wrote 1984 which I read in high school. The most shocking point in that book was that the government ran EVERYTHING including the opposition.
armitius66 1 week ago
Search: 'Ron Paul, What If'.
PirateSygnal 1 week ago
This was a truly heroic statement on mass (controlled) media. Kudos to the Judge!
03CobraR 1 week ago
Why doesn't Judge Napoletano run for President as a third party candidate and implement real constitutional government, if elected? This guy has the guts to tell it like it is but would be totally misrepresented by the lame stream media if he were to run. He has the power of persuasion to attract the ordinary people because he is a real opinion leader but the billionaire owned news media would have a field day tearing him down. The billionaires own most of the other presidential candidates.
veniceit1 1 week ago
whys he saying what if? this stuff is all true
spiffydude16 1 week ago
read thewayhomeorfacethefiredotnet, the truth about politics and government explained
asianbodyart 1 week ago
Judge Andrew Napolitano, he's onto them. Ever notice the more tax you have to pay, the bigger the government's debt grows? Congress, with impunity, passing unconstitutional laws, rampant insider trading, gross criminal activity. There is only one recourse when a government has reached this point. Citizens - load 'em and stand ready to defend your very freedom.
hd4ms 1 week ago
Food for thought, if the Federal Government needed the 18th Amendement to prohibit the sale, manufacture and distribution of intoxicating liquors (alcohol), how is it that the government can ban any other substance?
It seems even in the hey-day of progressivism the progressives couldn't even phathom such a leap of power without going through the proper legal channels.
socomfan555 1 week ago
I'll pitch in here. It is only a suggestion that the Founders were deists. The only one who I atleast, have ever been able to truly pinpoint as a deist was Jefferson, and even then, his moral beliefs (Jefferson Bible) guided his policy making along with the Constitution.
socomfan555 1 week ago
@socomfan555 To say America was not founded on Judeo-Christian principals is incorrect though. Deism does not reject moralism, simply the notion any god is constantly interfering with the world.
The United States has maintained many Judeo-Christian laws up unitl the 1960s when supreme Court decided to build on 19th-20th century progressivism and basically made stuff up using the 14th Amendment and the Commerce clause while simultaneously ignoring the 9th Amendment.
Supreme Court is corrupt.
socomfan555 1 week ago
Ron Paul is the only real choice, and it's a damn shame that most Americans lack the logic and intelligence to see that. Without the big changes Paul proposes, this country is in grave danger of entering into another war and eventually defaulting on our debts making the great depression look like a walk in the park. WAKE UP, PEOPLE. The government is currently made up of a homogenous mixture of self-serving politicians who are oblivious to the real issues! VOTE RP, and help rescue America!
daytonlax34 1 week ago
Ron PauL is Heard , Americans Vote for Ron PauL 2012
NaomII1986 1 week ago
Comment removed
NaomII1986 1 week ago
Is this guy still alive?
SapoArdente 1 week ago
Wow, this was on Fox
TallestFiddle 1 week ago
RON PAUL 2012! HE'S OUR ONLY HOPE!
susaneldridge1 1 week ago
no wonder they cancelled the Judges show!!
sisgp1 1 week ago 6
@sisgp1 You know I was always questioning the fact that a guy as open as this judge is on FOX NEWS but you say his show has been cancelled? I had no idea, though it all makes sense now...my opinion of Fox News stands firm I suppose.
Tohdette 1 week ago
This is on FOX!?
kunschner 1 week ago 18
@kunschner yeap sadly they cancelled the show
magr2005 1 week ago
@kunschner ya but they fired him
zoomorphicrap 1 week ago
@kunschner it WAS. Fox cancelled his show last week even though it's was one of Fox's highest rated show.
residentzombie 1 week ago
This is pretty much the greatest video ever. Paul/Napolitano 2012!
AdarianDreamer 1 week ago
This was the most informative show to learn about the Constitution ever and now the Judge is censored for teaching us the truth.
ThePorthos44 1 week ago
What the... Did I realllly just see a Fox News video I at least mostly agreed with? I'm not really on the same page as Ron Paul on economic/labour related ideas. I'm a Left-Libertarian/Social-Anarchist, myself... But I do agree with the Libertarian critique of the state. And Dr. Paul does seem to be scaring the shit out of the establishment, and that's always a good thing to see in my books.
kwaal 1 week ago
I wish more people would stand up and have the guts to admit Ron Paul is our Last BEST Hope! The media has done a grave injustice, by ignoring him all together. WAKE UP Everyone and don't let us continue down Either Party's hand fed Crap to us. The clearest definition of Insanity Is,........doing the same thing over & over again and expecting different results ! This has been going on since Nixon, and will continue until there is no more USA ! Lets start a Fresh new era>> VOTE RON PAUL !
alvinbeltramo 1 week ago
Comment removed
petefaders 1 week ago
That dude is probably going to be shot in a "drive by" by the end of this year.
grimapocalypse2 1 week ago
its funny for me(a swedish man) to see how the media treats Ron Paul, its EXACTLY how our media treated SD(The Swedish Democrats)...No actually Swedish media was 10times worse, but its the same thing in a lower degree.
MakeAGameWithMe 1 week ago
Buddhism 101:
What if the system can't give you security, and it is a simple property of nature?
And even more horrific? What if everything is as it is supposed to be and is a consequence of what you were actually working for?
2zaci2 1 week ago
Never thought I'd like a video from Fox this much
TheSearches 1 week ago
What if we're so focused on dumb ass bullshit and not the real problem?
SirUncleCid 2 weeks ago
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE TRUTH. :)
fantamize 2 weeks ago
@yfz450mane, maybe you should look up Iraq dimwit. 20,000 permenant duty troops are still there, not to mention the 50,000 or so Private Contracted security forces that the Taxpayer is footing the bill on, at over 100,000 dollars a year a piece. When were you in Iraq? Since you know so much about the country. Ron Paul wants to bring every last soldier home from every part of the world! Do you people even comprehend what that means? It means we would stop bullying every other nation on earth.
BarrackBLEWit 2 weeks ago
@lifeisgood070 actually, bush bailed out the banks, look it up, it was called the TARP fund. And which president sent us to Iraq for wmd's? Bush. Who ended it? Obama. Why is it fair to support Israel over its neighbors? It may not be, but america supports israels democratic government over its neighboring dictators, just like we support south korea, and supported south vietnam.
yfz450mane 2 weeks ago
I hate fox news, but I am seduced right now. Shall i hate all things fox, or admit that i totally fucking agree with this?
EagleSlightlyBetter 2 weeks ago
Ron Paul is just another actor in the scripted drama. He is a liar,deceiver, cheat and thief.He is the greatest one so far and has all of you fooled. He is brought to you by the same people who have placed these other limited candidates and he is just playing the role they have assigned him. I agree with everything else in this video except his views on RP.
lioner2 2 weeks ago
@lioner2 Liar deciever cheat? Any facts to back that up? 4 the last 30 yrs hes been by far the most consistent to his word & no one can find any dirt on him 'cause he lives his life purely, I study him fairly regularly. Do some homework b4 u mislead others. If he were to get in office he'd get assassinated by the establishment 'cause of his pure libertarian beliefs, the FED wont let it happen, and instead of tarnishing his reputation they ignore him in the media because that's all they can do!
Lonsterlmfu 2 weeks ago
@Lonsterlmfu I have some facts for you. RP has recently been endorsed by Stormfront, the KKK and David Duke. When RP was asked to return the money he'd gotten from them, he refused. RP is running on the GoP ticket even though ALL of his views are liberal except for fiscal representation. He doesn't stand a chance. It should be obvious by now seeing as how he places in dead last in every state. RP says he's not an racist, but says that if Israel was attacked with nukes, we wouldn't get involved.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke Is anything you said worse than a candidate who gave banks trillions of dollars, started and continued wars without public approval, endorses the assassination, imprisonment and torture of his own citizens, and grabs power whenever possible?
Who cares if the KKK endorsed Paul? The previous KKK grand wizard graduated from my highschool. idc if they hate blacks. But I care when someone kills my fellow Americans. And that is what Obama is doing. The kkk hardly does that now.
lifeisgood070 2 weeks ago
@lifeisgood070 The American people are fickled. In our wars with Afghanastan and then Iraq, the people overwhemingly supported the wars at first. Therefor, public approval was there. As far as "assassination, imprisonment and torture". That is a bunch of crap. We use that against alqaeda, alqaeda supporters and those that harbor al qaeda. You should really study these things you preach about.
I care that white supremists support Paul. It tells me all I need to know about the guy.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke Also... I'm not a racist or against freedom of religion... but have you read a fucking book on Israel? The UK and other nations created this fake Jewish nation in the middle. How is favoring one group (jews) over another (islams) morally fair at all? That region has been at war with itself for 1000's of years. And honestly, I could care less about what a bunch of seemingly stuck up Jewish people think is their god given right. Let them fight for it. Stop killing Americans.
lifeisgood070 2 weeks ago
@lifeisgood070 I DO favor Jews over islamists. Have you ever read the quran? I've read parts of it. The quran talks all through it about killing ANYONE that does not worship islam. If you'd like, I can provide quotes for you and links.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke He can't choose who endorses him, I'll look in2 the KKK,David Duke info, I remain skeptical, He's a Libertarian constitutionalist.Hello? It's vital we get back 2 respecting it. Its what makes this nation great. He doesn't stand a chance only because he's a threat to the elitists bankers/FED and therefore he is ignored in the media. He isn't a racist and your follow up to the reason you think he is one doesn't explain your point Nor did u support ur accusations of him being a liar
Lonsterlmfu 2 weeks ago
@Lonsterlmfu First of all, I never said he was a liar. Someone else did. But here is a few link for you. Even shows Paul in a picture with white supremists. newsone.c o m/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-10-racist-ron-paul-friends-supporters/
Paul is NOT ignored in the media. He's had just as much airtime as everyone else. But you Paul supporters like to use that as an excuse.
Him not standing a chance has NOTHING to do with bankers. He is a LIBERAL running on the GoP ticket!!!!!!
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke I 100% disagree W/u he's a LIBERTARIAN. A consistent one. & I have attentively watched EVERY 1 of the debates, up 'til lst night he was definitely ignored in the debates! Hve u been paying attention at all? I watch Fox/CNN everyday, listen 2 it political programs on XM. Do research online, He has most definitely been ignored no rational denying that. Also, he IS a threat to the big banks and the FED. LOL!! Elevate your thinking please you clearly don't get the point.
Lonsterlmfu 2 weeks ago
@Lonsterlmfu Oh I most certainly do get the point. All Paul ever says is that everything is the feds fault. El Nino, the Earthquakes around the world, whatever. It's all the feds fault. Paul has NO CLUE how to create jobs. He doesn't know how to run our military. Just because he was a flight surgeon, who cares? He never even shot a gun in the military. He never commanded any troops. And I don't really watch the news. I don't feel the need to be indoctrinated. I reasearch everything on my own.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke He is a veteran and a doctor, None of the other candidates up there have ever fought for this country! At least the man served! Romney has what? 5 sons?? All of which have not enlisted or fought for this country!
Lonsterlmfu 2 weeks ago
@Lonsterlmfu Oh give me a break. Ron Paul wasn't even drafted as he claims. And he was a FLIGHT SURGEON for crying out loud. He has NO CLUE what goes on on the front lines. He's never been there. I don't care for Romney too much. But I do like Santorum and Gingrich. With Santorum, we'd finally have religion again and with Newt, noone can out debate him. He is a historian. I'm a veteran too. Does that qualify me to run for the presidency? It takes so much more.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke I don't want your religion.
SirUncleCid 2 weeks ago
@SirUncleCid Then go to hell? That's your only alternative. If that's what you truly want, have at it. But thank you. I always knew Paul wasn't religious and you just proved my point.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke Paul has religious qualities, but I couldn't tell you if he's religious. It has no place to make decisions in government, though.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Funny. All of our founding fathers made decisions based on religion. That's who Paul is trying to speak for. But he cannot. He does not side with them on religious issues. Paul is a fraud. Period.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Nah, they just knew that humans cannot take away "God given rights". And you're just an idiot. How are you going to make decisions based on religion... when there are now plenty of religions. They'd conflict all day. Keep the race war going, says TwinSmoke!
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Which God given rights u are talking about mate..Go ask those dying of hunger in Africa or in many parts of the world about God given rights.. Rights are just privileges and whats funny is they are not the same every where u go around the world. Every country has different rights than the next country and if they were God given rights than God would've been making sure u got a plate of food, drinking water, no rapes etc etc.
BIGVHRIS32 1 week ago
@BIGVHRIS32 I used quotations mostly to signify that I was joking. I don't believe in God. I don't believe in Heaven, Hell. We are soulless creatures like the rest of them. And yeah, lol, this God guy definitely doesn't like Africa... At all.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@BIGVHRIS32 Are you dumb?.. Notice how in all these cases rights are taken away. You have the right to speak unless another person takes the right from you. People starving in Africa are starving because of oppression, not because food doesn't exist. Are you going to tell me there is no such thing as food in Africa?..
The amazing irony of this is that it's your atheist lunatic friends who oppressed the Africans to begin with, thinking them to be sub human... Fuck you. You're retarded.
knowwaie 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid So, Paul likes to bring up our founding fathers when it suits him. But when it comes to religion, he'll give our founding fathers the shaft. Ok, I got it. Thanks for clearing that up.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke I am not Ron Paul. Stop associating my views with his. Apparently religion = government, visa versa, to you. If anything, I think Paul is more respectful to the founding fathers than any of the other candidates.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid You are sticking up for loser Paul. Therefor you must atleast share his phylosophy. You really think Paul is more respectful to the founding fathers? Do you feel that the founding fathers that found this nation as a Judeo Christian nation would agree with legalizing narcotics, prostitution and gay marriage? You think they would agree with abandoning our allies? No, they most certainly wouldn't. Better think twice before including our founding fathers and Paul in the same sentence.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Our founding father did abandon our ally France! Washington warned us against foreign alliances,and Adams fought a Quasi-war against France because we refused to acknowledge our alliance with them in their war against England.
Our Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights for a reason. The first Amendment prevents the ability to create a nation religion and to prevent the abrigement free exercise of religion.
Many of the founders were deists. Also, look up JohnDickinson
socomfan555 1 week ago
@socomfan555 At least someone knows what they're talking about.. Not some close-minded cockass.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@socomfan555 France has NEVER really been an ally of ours. The only reason they made friends with us to begin with is so that we could give their country back to them after they surrendered it.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke France and the United States had a loose alliance after the revolutionary war. France called upon the United States to aid it in its war against Great Britain, and I believe it was Adams who refused, leading to the Quasi-War.
socomfan555 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke
Sir, I'm not even American, but even I know the US wasn't founded upon Christianity or Judaism or any religion. A lot of the Founding Fathers were Deists.
They were for liberty which would include legalization of Drugs.
“Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth & protection of the country.” -Thomas Jefferson
And they were pretty Non-interventionist as well. They didn't want anything to do with foriegn wars that weren't any of their own buisness. How do you not know this?
SolarFireflies 1 week ago
@SolarFireflies LOL! This nation WAS founded as a Judeo Christian nation. It's not suprising to hear someone that's not even an American say what you said. As far as Jefferson's quote. Pot wasn't made illegal untill 1937 and wasn't made a controlled narcotic untill 1970. Our founding fathers would NOT allow legalization of narcotics including heroin, PCP, meth. If you're going to be a foreigner posting here, you better study up. You clearly don't have a clue.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Dude, I'm sorry, but you are such a fucking idiot. You should be asking questions about why things are the way they are instead of giving close-minded explanations for important issues that require close and logical examination to truly understand. I know you're ignorant mind will just get angry as it tries to process intelligence so I will say no more, but I really hope you're only in the 10th grade or something because you've got a lot of growing up to do, buddy.
daytonlax34 1 week ago
@daytonlax34 your ignorant mind*
daytonlax34 1 week ago
@daytonlax34 LOL! It's hillarious how you tell me to grow up ROFL!! I don't have to curse to get a point across. I also am obviously WAY more educated than you. I've served this country. I've graduated college twice. What have you done lately? Whine, bitch and moan would be my guess. I'm also guessing that you've never opened a book or done ANY KIND of research LOL! I don't even have to work hard with you. You make yourself look like a moron. Keep up the good work.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke respect for serving. do some research on the drug issue though. there's alot to it. and i am educated. good talking with yo
daytonlax34 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke
And how exactly was the US, where it had a core belief for "freedom of religion," founded upon just one religion? You can tell me it was founded on religious principles but on a specific religion? No.
If you're saying Pot wasn't made illegial until 1937 then you're saying Pot was legal before that time, so what exactly is your point? Doesn't seem like they minded drugs being legal. How exactly do you know they'd be against meth, etc?
Hah, look who's talking.
SolarFireflies 1 week ago
@SolarFireflies I can't believe you don't understand the simiplist of historical facts. This nation WAS founded as a Judeo Christian nation. Even the founding fathers mentioned that. They gave us freedom of religion, freedom of speech and the right to bear arms so that the government could never fully contoll the people.
It took a while to make pot illegal because they didn't know what it was. Just like how they used to put cocaine in Coca Cola.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke
If the US was founded as a Judeo-Christian nation specifically, then I can see very little Freedom for Religion at work there. Besides, the founding fathers were noted secualrists. So that makes me more inclined to believe America wasn't founded on any specific religion.
-
Why make it illegial in the first place? It should be up to a person what they consume, not the state, and that I know the founders would agree with.
SolarFireflies 1 week ago
@SolarFireflies Every one of our laws comes from the Bible. That right there should tell you who founded this nation. But I will reiterate.... We were given the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom to assemble and the right to bear arms so that this nation could never be a communist nation. What don't you get about that?
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke
Sir, with all due respect, if you believe Common Law comes from the Bible, then I have nothing else to say to you, you clearly do not know its history.
...What I really don't get is why you're bringing communism into this now when it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
SolarFireflies 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke They agreed with slavery, so suck my ass. I think the founding fathers firmly believed do what you want until it impedes on someone else doing what they want. I think people should be able to make their own decisions, but like you, most people are fucking idiots and would make the wrong decision. And our allies? You mean the people we're going to help conquer the world with? Eat dick, forealz.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid LOL! I laugh at your kindergarden grammar and terms of endearment. As far as our allies, I'm talking about the ones that could be attacked any day. Like South Korea, Poland and Israel. About making the wrong decisions. That's all you. I don't do drugs. I don't need it. So study up buttercup. You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke I don't even know why we're having this conversation. Paul won't get elected anyways. Then, fuck yes, more war. I can't wait!
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Are you an American? If you are, I'll tell you something about the future of America in the Middle East, and this is from an Arab living in the Middle East. The Egyptian elections will no doubt bring about the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood with an overwhelming majority of votes through parliament. The brotherhood have criticized US politics and want to open talks with Iran...you can probably guess whats next but I think America is gonna sanction Egypt and potentially invade...watch
Tohdette 1 week ago
@Tohdette Yes, that's almost what I had figured was going to happen. You brought a new perspective to it, definitely.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Many of the Founders found slavery to be an attrocious act against humanity. The reason, at least from their letters, that Washington and Jefferson as well as others maintained slaves, is because they knew that they would have a harder time as free black men.
socomfan555 1 week ago
@socomfan555 Thank you for that.
SirUncleCid 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Our founding fathers believed that slavery would eventually disappear like how it was happening in the rest of the world.
RMinecraftworld 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke its funny because Washington had one of the largest hemp farms ever in America.
mpitts87 1 week ago
@mpitts87 Really? Can you prove that? I didn't think so. You may be a pothead and can't go a day without it. But as far as I'm concerned, if I want to get high, I just go skydiving. Drug addicts are part of the downfall of America. Congratulations pothead. Get high all you want. But you'll NEVER be able to outsmart me LOL!!
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke do a little research Washington did so did Jefferson, I don't smoke so all your name calling is just showing your stupidity and your lack of an actual argument and also cannabis is not addictive at all.
mpitts87 1 week ago
@mpitts87 LOL! Maybe I didn't tell you, but I've been a paramedic for 19 years and a nurse for 11. I know WAY more than you do about any drug out there. Cannabis is just as addictive as cigarettes if you smoke enough of it. And then some because cannabis gets you high and cigarettes don't. Therefor, there are MANY out there that may not have a physical addiction to it, but they DO have a mental addiction to it. Better study up buttercup. You're way out of your league here.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Then please tell me what in cannabis is addictive, and by your logic video games, television, education, and anything else can be addictive if you do it enough. Also emotions are addictive if you take being addicted to something as in you cant control the urge to do it. And just because your a paramedic/nurse means nothing what is your expertise in the nursing field? Prenatal? because your understanding of what constitutes an addict isn't your understanding of healthcare.
mpitts87 1 week ago
@mpitts87 Actually, I've always been in the emergency field. It's what I love. However, there's nothing really good about cannabis. I would suggest you read up. Since I know you probably won't do this on your own, I have a link for you. abovetheinfluence.c o m/facts/drugsmarijuana/?utm_campaign=paid-search&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_content=marijuana&gclid=CLH14Yfuw64CFcGc7QodJnH9VQ
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke I never said there was anything good about it, just simply there is no chemical that can be addictive in it. But obviously you rather just say its bad and not stay on topic. I would of thought you were a liberal by the way you argue.
mpitts87 1 week ago
@mpitts87 Yeah, yeah, yeah. Your liberal comment is ridiculous and I cannot be baited into something that will turn into nothing. By the way, marijuana WAS the topic. But if the last link wasn't good enough, try this one. addict-help.c o m/marijuana.asp. I could go on all day.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke since you know so much on the subject why do call it marijuana, that name was made up by US propaganda. But back to you staying on topic. If I said that a house is blue and you say that the house is not safe, that's not staying on topic sure we are talking about the same house but not in the same context. Therefore you were not staying on the topic of cannabis's addictive properties or the lack thereof.
mpitts87 1 week ago
@mpitts87 It's well known that those with addictive personalities can and DO get addicted to pot. I have friends that smoke that crap all the time even though I haven't smoked it in 19 years. I've seen many that went from pot to cocaine or acid. Therefor, it IS a gateway drug. ANYONE that wants to legalize that crap can't be that intelligent.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke So you`re saying that you need those laws in order to "stay away" from those drugs... LOL you`re like: omg they are going to legalice heroin now i`m going to be an addict :O LOL
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 I was hoping to deal with people here that had more intelligence than to just quote Ron Paul. But I guess you're not it. Too bad.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Lol i was hoping to get a REAL answer... but i guess you`re not trying to aboid the argument i`ve just quote (sarcasm) LOL
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 If you don't have your own mind, you're not worth my time. It's comical to see Paul supporters do nothing but quote Mr. Paul. But I just noticed your handle. So, between the fact that you can't do anything but quote Paul and you're a satanist, that's really all I need to know.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke LOL you`re obviously incapable of answering the most pragmatic argument and you`re trying to deviate the main point in order of avoid the fact that you don`t have a real answer for it... so cut the "ad nominem" fallacies for a second (you`re not arguing agains the the idea, but you`re deviating the argument to attack ME as a person to disguise you`re own lack of arguments)... LOL
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 First of all, you never ASKED a question genius. Secondly, you have YET to say anything that has to do with the topic at hand. Thirdly, I haven't "attacked" you. I merely stated the obvious facts. But you still have YET to ad anything to this conversation. You are speaking incoherantly and you're off in your own little world. But you could always pray to Satan. I'm sure he'll give you something worth while to ad to this.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke omf lol XD i`ve never said anything about a "question" (quote me if you can), but i do took a posture and made an argument, that you so far have been incapable of giving an answer for.. instead of that you`re using ad-nominem fallacies to disguise you`re own lack of arguments (how cheap is that?) LOL very lame indeed.
*Do you need those laws in order to "stay away" from those drugs?
*would you become an heroin addict if the law agains it dissapear?
ANSWER (if you can) LOL
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 You know, maybe you should try being a paramedic. I bet your thoughts would change then. I've SEEN what happens to people on that crap. So, since I've been a paramedic for 19 years and used to work in Miami Florida. I'll consider this an education for you. You clearly have not seen what I have. But in your last post, you said "you`re obviously incapable of answering the most pragmatic argument". If pragmatic argument isn't a question, why should I answer?
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke LOL this is way too easy,(lets just ignore how you obviously don`t know the difference betwen giving an answer to a question and giving an answer to an argument, so lets carry on), ok, now your falling in to an "honor by association fallacy":
premise (A) = you are a paramedic
premise (B) = you've seen what happens to drug addicts
A+B = C (your argument)
(C) = as i`m a paramedic and I've seen what happens to drug addicts, people need laws to keep them away from drugs LMFAO
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 It's becoming clear to me now that you could care less about anyone but yourself. I, on the other hand, care about everyone. I hate to see people destroy their lives and their families lives because of drugs. But if you think a drug addict doesn't harm anyone else by using, I can prove you wrong all day. Your theory about drug use is completely invalid. You don't have the education or knowledge to beat me on this topic. But let's continue anyway.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke XD still using ad hominem fallacies to disguise your own lack of arguments agains my ideas LOL, don`t you see how pathetic that is?... let me show you:
premise (A)= you don`t care about anyone but yourself.
premise (B)= I care about everyone
A+B= C (what you just said)
(C) = As you don´t care about anyone, but i care about everyone, people need laws to keep them away from drugs LOL
stop evading my questions
would you become an heroin addict if the law agains it dissapear?
magicthunder666 1 week ago
@magicthunder666 I wouldn't use drugs under any circumstance. But there are MANY others that would. I mean if it's legal and readily available, then why not try it? Those that do try it will statistically do it again. But you keep worshiping the devil, not caring about anyone but yourself and keep coming up with fruitless points in an otherwise meaningful conversation. You're doing a fantastic job so far.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke I dislike you very much, so fucking strongly opinionated, you don't even understand drugs would be harder to get if they were regulated, it is WAY easier to get marijuana in high school than alcohol, and that is when you are young and naive. If we regulated drugs, made them legal at age 25, and highly educated everyone on them, I can guarantee that there would not be drug use increase. There is evidence from Holland supporting that. and stats don't show that you will use again?
rickyp17 1 week ago
@rickyp17 I could care less how you feel about me LMAO!! I understand drugs and the ramifications better than you ever will. I used to be one of them. Then I quit and became a paramedic in Miami Florida. Your ignorant thoughts mean nothing to me. I know more about drugs and the effects that they give than you ever will. I have saved numerous lives from overdoses. What have you done lately? If you're atleast not as educated as me, just stop. I'll make you look stupid every single time.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, you understand drugs and the ramification better than a former addict? tut oh, your ignorance is showing.. Haha i catch you in a lie as i continue reading quote " i wouldn't do drugs under any circumstance", You think your smart, when you are just straight up bullshitting, you don't make anybody look dumb but yourself, you don't even argue the points other people make against you, you just talk out of your ass.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 You are a complete and TOTAL idiot. allow me to draw in crayon for you what I was telling you since you just can't get it with your feeble mind. Yes, I used to do drugs. No, under any circumstance would I ever do them again. My God you are stupid. I've done them. I've saved those that HAVE done them. What have you done lately? You are clearly an idiot and I have no further use for you. It must suck to be uneducated. But whenever you'd like, I can for sure enlighten you. ROFL. Dumbass.
TwinSmoke 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, you will never be able to "enlighten" anyone, when you say, "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance", that say's that i have never done drugs, fucking ANY circumstance, you un-educated, liar, haha what hospital do you work at what degrees do you hold? how do you have so much time for youtube? You haven't saved shit, i've already argued with you on an other account completely about this, you never brought it up. You are bullshitter, get over it.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 Yep, just as I thought. You cannot grasp the simplest of things. LOL!! Saying "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance" does NOT mean "I have never done drugs" you moron. My God you are stupid. But I tell you what. One day, when you're all grown up and you graduate kindergarden, come back and we can continue this discussion. Because as of right now, you've proven over and over again that you don't have the intelligence to keep up with me. ROFL!
TwinSmoke 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, Clearly you have a misconception of the english language, it is all good though, because i am a happy, loving, person. Some-what intelligent, haha at the very least intelligent enough to keep up with a lying troll. You know you are lying about saving people, and for the record, you have to say again, or you are saying you have never done drugs, you fucking retard.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 Unlike you, I have a great understanding of the English language. But you actually think you're intelligent when you don't know the difference between "I've used drugs in the past" and "I'll never use them again"? Really? You are comical. Your points are proven invalid and moot at best. But you telling me that I'm lying about saving people. Is that supposed to be an insult? ROFL! I know what I've done with my life which is clearly more than you've ever acheived. Give it a rest.
TwinSmoke 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, WOW, first of all you are not acknowledging all the bullshit you have spewed, where are you a doctor, what degree from where? what drugs did you do? how often? How long?, If you had said, "I've used drugs in the past, i'll never use them again" that would make sense, but you can't even acknowledge the FACT, that if you say "I wouldn't do drugs under ANY circumstance." Implies that you have and will never do drugs. FUCKING MORON.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 LOL! Your stupidity is amazing. First of all, I'm not a doctor. But I have been a paramedic for 19 years. Secondly, (and this is where your stupidity comes in) me saying that I wouldn't touch drugs under any circumstance in NO WAY IMPLIES that I've never done them in the past. Everything I've stated thus far is grammatically correct. It's not my fault you're not intelligent enough to know that. Everything else you asked is none of your buisness. Must suck to be inferior. LMAO!!
TwinSmoke 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, the fact of the matter is you are a troll. Yes it does you fucking idiot, you have to use, either now, or anymore, for it to not imply that. You are literally retarded. If a former drug user "I wouldn't touch drugs under any circumstance", you have to say now, because obviously in your past there were circumstances. Only somebody who has never done drugs can say that. I.e I meet you for the first time, you say that, absolutely implies you have never done them. specify. dickhead.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 LMAO!! I love your terms of endearment. However, on the stupidity scale, you rank at the top. You can't even comprehend the simplist parts of the English language LOL!! I DO NOT have to use now or anymore. You're just too stupid to understand. I could draw it for you in crayon, but something tells me you still won't get it. I mean seriously. As dumb as you are, I can't even believe you'd come here and TRY to debate anyone. You look like an idiot to everyone reading this.
TwinSmoke 6 days ago
@TwinSmoke Haha, please refer me to this stupidity scale, you know double digits is a low iq right.. You may want to take a test, might put things in perspective for you, and the fact of the matter is i am right. Anybody who can logically think will be on my side. You literally only call me dumb, and never refute anything I say with an actual argument, you are a weak-minded, old, internet troll.
rickyp17 6 days ago
@rickyp17 Yeah, I call you dumb because you clearly are. All you do is come here, curse and belittle anyone that doesn't agree with you. That's pretty childish. But, I've had an IQ test on 3 seperate occasions and it doesn't matter what my IQ is, you'd never believe me anyway. But if you want me to "refute" you cursing because you're not smart enough to post something without cursing, think again. Want to have a serious debate? Then grow up and ask a question worth answering.
TwinSmoke 5 days ago
@TwinSmoke People that like the particular substance the used will most likely try it again.
rickyp17 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke The drug war is an un-winnable fallacy, surely anyway who understands how corporations lobby/why, understands that.(in this case Pharma and Private-prison)
rickyp17 1 week ago
@rickyp17 I would ask that you speak English on this website. But you were probably too high to even know the difference.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke ok in that same argument let make video games illegal because some people may get addicted to them, lets ban cigarettes, alcohol, sex, and anything else that someone could become addicted to. When do you want to take personal responsibility for your own actions and not have someone have to tell you what you should or should not do?
mpitts87 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Just because your a paramedic for 19 years and a nurse for 11 years does NOT grant you any knowledge about Cannabis. I have ADHD and I used to e on Adderall. Adderal is WAYYYY worse then cannabis. With Adderall I experienced irriatiblity, sleeplessness, loss of appetite (lost 30 pounds while on adderall).
With cannabis, I was able to focus while being able to eat, able to sleep and keep in a positive mood.
MikeyJTheGreat 1 week ago
@MikeyJTheGreat I will put it to you this way. Basically cannabis impairs your brain function. Here's proof. abovetheinfluence.c o m/facts/drugsmarijuana/?utm_campaign=paid-search&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_content=marijuana&gclid=CLH14Yfuw64CFcGc7QodJnH9VQ
So, I welcome you to research this all you want. I've already done my homework.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke
using 'above the influence' as a scientific source...please i hope you're not serious
OBAViJEST 1 week ago
@OBAViJEST Then try this one. I could post links on this crap all day long. addict-help.c o m/marijuana.asp
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke you just dont get it do you. I dont even smoke weed, but you can't post 'sources' that are blindly anti-weed. I don't see anything factual. It's all opinions and bad experiences.
OBAViJEST 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke No you didn't, Abovetheinfluence is an organization that is COMPLETEY baised against marijuana. Your brain washed from the propoganda site. That site also says the gateway is real lol. List a real source of info please.
MikeyJTheGreat 5 days ago
@MikeyJTheGreat Then how about this one? psychologytoday.c o m/blog/the-teenage-mind/201012/is-marijuana-addictive
Or this one? drugabuse.g o v/publications/research-reports/marijuana-abuse/marijuana-addictive
Or this one? healthland.time.c o m/2010/10/19/is-marijuana-addictive-it-depends-how-you-define-addiction/
This one? recoveryguy.hubpages.c o m/hub/Is-Marijuana-Addictive
This one? spiritualriver.c o m/is-marijuana-addictive/
And this one. marijuana-addiction.n e t/
TwinSmoke 5 days ago
@TwinSmoke THC (Tetrahydracannabinol) regulates things like dopamine and serotonin in the brain so obviously thats why people with ADHD and Depression are prescribed to it. If you worry about a plant, i'd worry more about the phramaceuticals they commonly prescribe to people.
MikeyJTheGreat 1 week ago
@SirUncleCid Why not? Our founding fathers used religion to guide their policies.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Like I said at least he served. We don't just need people on the front lines. I think Gingrich is the most intelligent candidate by far, I'm just weary of his past I can't stand Santorum or the things he stands 4 he's a war hawk extreme opposite of Paul. I'm afraid he'd use his religion 2 dictate/impose his values on America.
Lonsterlmfu 1 week ago
@Lonsterlmfu He wouldn't use religion to dictate his values on America. We have a seperation of church and state. NOONE can trump that.
TwinSmoke 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke LOL very Naive response, u don't think with the way Obama hs disregarded separation of church & state (which is not in our constitution!) U don't think that Santorum could impose his extreme Catholic ideals on the country?? Like his anti contraception stance?? LOL I'm done arguing with you you're not quite on the level of objective debating that I thought gawd that response was revealing ..you THINK you know what you're talking about, but you dont'.
Lonsterlmfu 1 week ago
@TwinSmoke Another thing, I'm a very objective person, especially right now in the mess we're in, I'm not so sure RP would be the best guy to run this country but when it comes to respecting the constitution auditing the fucked up FED and leaving moral issues out of politics I think he's got it right! You really should stop finding reasons to bash him, he's the most humane relatable person running. Who are you supporting? Owebama??
Lonsterlmfu 2 weeks ago
@Lonsterlmfu Paul doesn't want to audit the fed. He wants to end it. But he has no clue what to do once it's gone. The other 3 candidates want to audit them. RP's ideas are mostly liberal. Allowing states to legalize narcotics, gay marriage and prostitution. Bringing our troops home and abandoning our allies. Especially ones that could be attacked any day like South Korea and Israel. Paul even stated that if Israel gets nuked, we wouldn't get involved. He's an idiot.
TwinSmoke 2 weeks ago
@TwinSmoke hey i got one for you....obama was endorsed by the nation of Islam an openly racist group and all he said was that he cant stop ppl from backing him up....how about the fact that our nations support of Israel makes us targets to those that Israel attacks how about RP gets money from American troops than all everyone else put together are you saying their opinions dont matter? it seems to me that u sir are blind to common sinse
BigDJuggalo420 1 week ago