Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • IMPEACH THIS MAN!

  • domestic attn, is what has it foot on my neck

  • Were going too easy on Nuclear Policing with Iran and Pakistan. Pakistan doesn't even have control over it's Nuclear Asset. All we need is some half retarded Taliban freak to gain control of Pakistani Nuclear Arsenal and fly a plane with a live nuke again into one of the buildings in New York.

    Islamic Terrorism is the main threat in our age and time and i think it must be addressed immediately and crushed to it's roots rather than Chinese or Korean Extremism.

  • Some of us are just watching the sexual tension between Hillary Clinton and David Miliband. Shallow, I know. But she is the Mistress of Seduction by not giving him the favour of her notice. It's a great training video. Go Smart Power!

  • I am glad to see the President of the United States leading and taking part in a very important issues that could affect all of us, our children and grand children. Thank you Sir.

  • @Buzzmasterflash your a fucking idoit

  • @Buzzmasterflash Yeah not to mention that it was illegal what he was doing here under the constitution, I guess you love global government and we should just eliminate the US if favor of global communism, Fuck you traitor

  • Isnt it illegal for obama to have this job as the president of the united states as well?

  • Comment removed

  • @Mikelivermore Yes it is illegal. But no one seems to care.

  • jewswreccknations haha that name is epic

  • Work towards disarmament, I bet the US military is happy about that, NOT...

  • The real fear is not held by terrorists, but by America. America understandably fears that (without international action) 'anti-West terrorism' is increasinlgly likely to obtain on one or more loose NWs. (America will not reduce this chance by increasing its stock pile, but by reducing loose NWs)

  • Greg i toally understand what you mean, and yes i agree to what you mean as disarming the US but only to a point. Although fear can flourish on a weak mind, theres a difference between Self-aware and weak. Secure and nieve (crappy spelling). If we were to be dissarmed, it would discourage the whole police act that we play that in the 20th century has done us no good, and same with the 21st, however leaving us defenceless in the name of peace? How will this encourage our enemies to be passive?

  • Obama reads as though he wrote this shit. A puppet or a salesman to convince the American People that we should fear the Middle East..bullshit. Fear is their weapon on weak minded people. We are not a global force and American troops are caught up in a World Bank thug force to control any country that won't go along with their lies and threats. This is a way to be based close to Iran who is their real target. Watch "Ruled by the Gods" explains the crap your watching. Disarm USA ?

    peace

  • i was in that room for Model UN. representing honduras and zortaguay, woot.

    also, everybody knows that it's not illegal for the president to chair a UN committee; it is a premise that is difficult to believe at best.

    further, god bless president obama.

    peace and prosperity to the world.

  • good job, president obama. give the world leaders a chance to talk about peace, sign petitions in support of peace, take action towards world peace. thank you.

  • finally, nuclear weapons stink.

  • It sure feels good to have a President who can pronounce nuclear.

  • Sarah Palin could pronounce it, too, but only when they spelled it "new-clear" on her teleprompter. During her debate with Biden, when she couldn't use it, she was back to "nookyooler."

  • More people needs to watch these videos... they're very informative. My only complaint of this one is that there's only one camera and it's pointing the same way the entire time.

  • "Mr President sure looks GOOD!" U racist bastards don't write me!

  • I made a comment about it above. The "Emolument Clause" of Section 9 of Article 1 of the Constitution forbids an elected official from holding another public office (foreign or domestic). That's why Hilary Clinton had to resign as Senator before accepting the position of Secretary of State.

    This is not a violation, because it's not a position. He's just chairing a U.N. meeting in place of Susan Rice for this one resolution while the U.S. has the rotating presidency of the Security Council.

  • youre wrong. he is taking a seat in foreign gov and another job. thats pretty much a sum up

  • groundbreaking...lets hope these are more than just words. hopefully they are prefaces to immediate action!

  • brilliant!

  • The beginning is funny!

  • It's awesome we the people have the opportunity to watch history in action.

  • ITS REALLYN ABOUT TIME !......we put a stop to theses sold out banking pigs.........treason.....and murder.......but hey the public is soo dumbed down they willn not see it................here we go getting played by evil again.........fear porn pros!

  • No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

  • I figured it was only a matter of time before somebody quoted Article 1 Section 9 Clause 8.

    This is not a violation of Article 1 because he is only chairing a meeting of the Security Council to pass this particular resolution. It's not a permanent position. It's Rice's position, but only for this month, since the Security Council presidency rotates every month.

    If he chaired a meeting of a local Rotary International club for one night it wouldn't be a violation of Article 1 either.

  • Having read that clause, I'd say that trollbuster's interpretation is correct and anyone who claims that President Obama is violating it is realllllly reaching.

  • Get rid of our nuclear weapons while other countries seek to gain them? this is a bit worrying. If I was president I was secretly be developing newer ones, just in case.

  • It's cool how we the people get to view stuff like this.

  • look at the guy behind Obama in the beginning :D

  • lol the guy that looks like hes mad at Obama?

  • Nope the one that was sitting in Hillary's chair >.>

  • Haha, you know Hillary is just sitting behind him going "Fuck my life" lmao

  • Hah! get out of Hillary's chair, rahm!

  • No doubt he was trying it out for size. Somebody forgot to tell him that only cabinet-level people sit behind the President and staff members have to sit in the peanut gallery by the wall.

    But, given his track record, I'll bet big money that he expects to be in the cabinet in a few years. My bet is he'll be either Secretary of Commerce or Deputy Secretary of HUD by 2013.

  • This is so totally Unconstitutional

  • How so?

  • No it's not.

  • Wow, worst choice of words.  You're an idiot.

  • How is it? Please enlighten us

  • i like the tiny little hammer they give him in the beginning

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more