0:35-0:41 KaBoom-Boom "Did you hear that?" <-- the guy that said that with the pipe wrench over his shoulder.. is he a firefighter or a Control Demo guy? The after he said that, someone else says "Keep an eye on that building it's coming down soon" <-- he had advance notice; who is he and where did he get that info from?
Silverstein is as bad as Bush and Cheney !! How convenient that in July of 2001 he redid his insurance to insure the WTC for $7,000.000,000.00 adn against Terrorist Attack !!!! Hmmm.... I smell a little weasel !!!
@robbob100 he did not redo his insurance, His lease was up so he released it for 99 years, and like any lease for anything its required by law to have full coverage insurance.
@brownspottedbanana The fact you said "investingated" clearly shows your level of intelligence. Not only is it spelt "investigated", since when has a Google and Youtube search constituted investigation?Perhaps try talking to the people who were actually there and witnessed the events first hand
Your only uploaded video is of a cat eating meat, so I assume you are mentally challenged. It says you are from Marshall Island, so must be inbreeding or the result of the radiation from US nuclear tests
@Lostkiwi123 the fact that i have a life and dont spend alot of time on the internet explains that. and when i am online talking to retards that think buildings steel buildings collapse with fire, it doesn't really matter if i spell all this shit right because you forgot a couple perioids.
the pentagon is the most secure and guarded building in the world, and only one cheap video was released of it that didn't even clearly show anything, they are holding recordings form 84 other cameras.
all those cops and fireman in there probably ended up dying... my father was fatally wounded in the north tower. i joined the United States Marine Corp for revenge. i miss you dad ill bring you justice
A whole lot of paranoid delusional whack jobs posting on here.
911 was an outside job
Bush is too stupid to be an evil mastermind
There is no evil plot on the governments side
You all need to come back to reality.
No REAL science backs any Controlled Demolition
Not one "truther" has any whitepapers published in any respected scientific journal, they were so scared to try, they paid Bentham to publish without peer review and then created their own "journal" to have carte blanche.
and eisteen... various scared people saying random thoughts in an area of mass confusion, fires, airplanes smashing into buildings around them, etc are hardly smoking guns dude. People try to gain SOME control over horrible situations and saying things like that gives them a small feeling of, "ok, I know whats gonna happen next.."
@Chokermax FACT: Diesel generators in the building caught fire and exploded throughout the day, damage from falling debris also aided in weakening the structure. How the building was constructed (framing) it aided with HOW the structure collapsed. Witness reports and video support these claims.
@ERAUPRCWA No, no that isn't a fact. No official report has ever said anything about exploding generators. Generators do not explode anyways. It would have been the fuel tanks exploding and NIST has already stated that 95% of the fuel in those tanks has been accounted for and that the fuel oil contributed nothing to the collapse of the building. FACT: Saying "FACT:" before imparting information does not make said information a fact.
They admitted they used explosions for WTC 7 because the fire was to big and it would be to dangerous to just let it burn to the ground so they evacuated the building and took it down
@admiralYulauren101 explosives weren't used but several diesel generators in the building was... When it comes down to it, the building did come down because of fire. The Diesel generators caught fire and burned throughout the day and after hours, they started to explode (people reported explosions and loud booms) because of how the WTC7 was built the structure couldn't maintain itself and collapsed after several hours of burning and explosions. NOT A CONSPIRACY JUST BAD CONSTRUCTION.
@admiralYulauren101 prior to 9/11 there was a program on TLC about the WTC I remember watching how the buildings were constructed and so on. After 9/11 many programs came on about the collapse also doing research on what happened especially with WT7, it was reported explosions throughout the day and fires, people were told NOT to go downstairs on the main floor b/c most of the generators were there, on fire, & were exploding. put two & two together, explosions and fire caused the build. to fall
@admiralYulauren101 you heard wrong, nothing was melted, now the frames were weakened but not melted. yes there were explosions but not what you're thinking... check out "9/11 Debunked: WTC 7's Collapse Explained" here on youtube, now I didn't use this as MY ONLY source (that's just stupid) but the information that this person found is the same information that I received when I was learning about the WTC complex and it's destruction.
What about the Verizon building, a Greek Church, and another Federal building?? Why didn't these other buildings catch on fire from the 1 and 2 towers falling on them and collapse as the WTC 7 did hours later?
well the boss of the world trade center said that the fire department called him and said they can't contain the fire and he said just pull it so they demolished it
Hi look, there is no way that if i plane crash into a building, that it collapses and just fall straight to the ground, it falls over if a plane crash into it... if you put special bombs or something in the ground just under the building that is holding up the building, then it falls like that.
@Jazzel93 stop with the conspiracies, find out about how the building was constructed and what was inside of the building. It was concluded that the building collapsed because of fire... that conclusion is very true once you do the research on what I said.
@ERAUPRCWA What research is that? The time has come my friend, to start thinking for urself, and don't let others sell u some stupid ass bullshit. Stick to easy logical verifiable facts. There is not a shred of evidence explaining the sudden complete failure of ALL remaining columns, maybe u should read NIST's report again to find out. Good luck!
@Sandberg1972 the research conducted by the 911 commission and independent analyst. They concluded that fire caused the collapse. Due to damage and fire from WTC 1 and 2, it spread fires throughout the building. The subsequent explosions heard throughout the day were from diesel generators located throughout the building which were on fire all day. The explosions blew out columns and weakened the structure to collapse. You can see the building tresses collapse prior to the main collapse.
@ERAUPRCWA Maybe u should take another hard look at that 911-Omission report, and first notice that the collapse of WTC7 wasn't even mentioned with a single word. Go ahead & check that 1st. NIST's report on WTC7 came out in I believe 2008 or 2009, way after the 911-Comm. report. There's no proof of how the fires got started in WTC7, there're reports that fires were burning already before WTC1 collapsed. Ur dieselgenerator explosions do not have a shred of evidence supporting it, if so, show me.
@ERAUPRCWA Also check all these so-called "independant analysts", & who they work for, see the conflicting interests they have. Or check Kevin Ryan's articles for this. What u're claiming are all things that are not supported by any evidence. Also u haven't presented anything that deals with the sudden complete failure of all remaining steel columns. That's not so strange of course, because u can't. Just like NIST couldn't. There's only ONE explanation for something like this, take 1 wild guess.
@Sandberg1972 this is youtube, presenting a purely academic debate on this topical issue is impossible. The facts are there to back up the claims of no conspiracy. Conspiracy theorist see what they want, even when the facts behind it prove otherwise...for example, there are people who believe UA175 was a missile b/c of how it looked on video, but based off the United Airlines paint scheme circa 2001 on the 767-200 it totally disproves those claims, but conspiracy theorist still don't believe it
@ERAUPRCWA The facts are here that back up every possibility of government involvement in 9/11, and even more at covering up the events afterwards. The media is obviously complicit in keeping all the evidence out of the view of the public. U can bring "UA175 was actually a missile" into the discussion, but that just shows u don't have answers to the issues I brought up, just like NIST don't have any answers to them, let alone credible ones.Check the 911-Comm. report, WTC7 is not even mentioned.
I sincerely hope YOU don't think UA175 was a missile. If you do, then you're a real shitter: what about those people who were actually on those REAL planes, and their families?
@AETutorials42 No i don not think UA175 was a missile however, I believe there's no definite proof that the airplane hitting WTC2 was actually UA175. I don't believe in missiles hitting the Towers, there's no evidence for it.
And u have to be careful about those people on the planes, that also is not 100% confirmed in my mind. I don't buy into all kinds of DNA-identification by the Army that easily, they can claim whatever they want, no one will be able to verify it.
@Sandberg1972 The fact their families say they're dead and they're not walking this earth doesn't confirm it? I suggest you go watch On Native Soil and call all those families you had members on flight 175, 11, 93 and 77 liars. I fucking dare you. I can't verify that god DOESNT exist, but I sure as hell don't see any proof of existence either. I don't fully understand thermal expansion, but i'll take the experts words for it, cause ya know, they're experts. 911 was an outside job.
@Oz1976 U need to read a bit more precise. I wrote that I'm not ruling voicemorphing out. Of course these people are dead, duh!
And u just take "the experts' " word for it, especially when they didn't investigate ANY physical evidence (which was illegally destroyed asap), but relied SOLELY on computersimulations, the inputdata of which is UNaccessible to anyone but NIST. I'll just stick 2 the 1500+ courageous A&E's and my own common sense. U just stick to a single beam causing a total collapse
@Sandberg1972 No it wasn't. That's a 9/11 Myth MEME. The steel was all investigated by several organizations including members of the ASCE, NIST, FEMA, CDI, and ImplosionWorld. It was not solely computer sims. That's ridiculous. Stop...just stop, and do some ACTUAL research NOT FROM A TRUTHER SITE.1500 courageous A&E's? Dude they're WHACKO's. That's 1500 WORLDWIDE. Guess how many engineers are EMPLOYED in the US alone (of which I am one): 1,600,000. Architects? 140,000. Do the math.
@Sandberg1972 No it's you who's a clueless idiot, regurgitating 8 year old MEMEs and nothing more. FEMA? They did a BRIEF investigation and then turned it over to the professionals of the ASCE and SEAoNY you dumb mother fucker. None of the steel was shipped overseas ASAP you fucking twat.
(911myths.com/index.php/Recycled_Steel)
You still don't have a clue about AE911Truth (DICK Gages money Scam) How many of them are civil or structural engineers? Here's a hint, can count them on my fingers
@Oz1976 Didn't I ask u already to please elaborate on Richard Gage's money scam? Did he just all of a sudden went crazy and decided to look for other A&E's to try and convince them that they should join him in his moneyscam? What kind of sick fuck would Richard Gage be, to do such thing?
& what kind of proof do you have that there are less than 10 civil or structural engineers on that petitionlist?
And ahhh, the "the steel was inspected"-cover, how nice. Just the "right" beams of course
@Sandberg1972 You're an idiot. You realize you can see exactly who is what in their petition right? Here's some help you dolt: (www2 .ae911truth. org/signpetition . php) It has EXACTLY what their degree is in. Of the 1507, only 1400 are currently licensed. Gage only has a BACHELOR's of Arch. His business was shit, he caught on to 9/11 through Steven Jones. He makes over $80,000 from AE911Truth (33% of the orgs income FYI). This is all easilly researched but you're too dumb to figure it out.
@Oz1976 Wow! 80,000 a year??? Are u serious? That much? Wow, well since it's his one and only job right know it's uhhhh...wait a minute...80,000 a year u say? That's damn little for an architect.
Seriously, if u're trying to downplay his expertise by insinuating he JUST only has a bachelor's of Arch., and therefore he's not qualified as an expert, well go ahead. If it works for u.
But man, 80 grand a year, what a poor scam!!! LOL!
@Sandberg1972 It is his only job. He closed his failed architecture firm to concentrate solely on ae911truth getting free trips to europe to preach his bullshit. He has no masters' or secondary architectural degree's aside of his BS. His company was a failure. Look it up. Now he get's to preach nonsense (go on debates and drop cardboard onto cardboard as if it's an accurate demonstration) and drink pina colada's on the house. It IS damn little for an architect, atleast one that's intelligent.
@Sandberg1972 (continued) OH SHIT You're an ALex Jones flunky!!!! No wonder. Charlie Sheen is batshit crazy dude. What exactly are the "tough questions" you allude to in your bio? Facts are facts and 9/11 Truth has ZERO facts. 10 years later no whistleblowers. 10 years from a government that couldn't keep a lid on a sperm shot on a dress. 10 years of failure. "thermite" paper debunking itself. Dick Gage going apeshit crazy on Hardfire. Yeah. You go ahead and believe that 1/10th of 1% of A & E's.
@AETutorials42 Also, I haven't ruled out voicemorphing 100%, but it's a long shot indeed. But given the importance of those hijacking one has to be careful. As little as possible would've been left to chance by the people who planned this operation.
I'm not a shitter :-) , I'm just someone who knows when he's been lied to, especially when it's so goddamn obvious.
You ARE a shitter, by the way. That goes without saying, regardless of whether you think UA175 was a missile. If you knew when you were being lied to, you would stop believing in conspiracy theories, because they are untrue, and unproven, and even when they THINK they've been proven (like 9/11), those bullshit theories have been disproved by intelligent people. RKOwens4. Nuff said.
Well, obviously you haven't watched any of his videos because you are far too egotistical to pull your head out of your ass. I think you're a sheep, herded by the glorious dickhead Alex Jones and his little buddies. RKOwens4 isn't "they" - he's not part of the government, or "the enemy", in your paranoid little bullshit world. He's personally took it as his job to research every conspiracy theory behind 9/11, and destroy them with the real facts, and he has. Wake up.
@Sandberg1972 the only one living in a fantasy is you sir. You're nothing more than a sheep to the 9/11 profiteering scam. It's you ignoriing facts. We have checked what we've been told, you haven't. You blindly believe in mythical thermite (PAINT AND PRIMER CHIPS FYI), you blindly believe in Controlled Demolition of the towers (NOT EVEN YOUR WHITE KNIGHT DANNY JOWENKO BELIEVES THAT), you blindly follow nutjobs like Alex Jones, Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, Jason Bermas, David Ray Griffin, etc etc.
@Sandberg1972 Voicemorphing? Lied to? About what exactly? You're talking about a conspiracy that would include 1000's if not 100's of 1000's of people and yet, 10 years later, not one of them with a fucking conscience? Not one of them sickened by what happened that day and the wars since? Are you fucking deluded? Please provide a clear, concise, and complete narrative of what you think happened that day. There was no CD. There was no inside job. We were fucking attacked by terrorists.
@ERAUPRCWA Yeah I'm with Sandberg on this one. The 911 report says nothing about WTC 7 and NIST has never said anything about "exploding generators" or their contribution to the collapse of the building. Instead they have stated that 95% of the fuel oil stored in WTC 7 is accounted for and thus contributed nothing to the collapse. NIST attributes the collapse of WTC 7 to fires causing one of the core columns to walk off its base initiation a progressive collapse.
@Ahlywog that is not what the NIST report says at all. You need to reread it (if you ever did) and try to comprehend exactly what it's saying: wtc.nist.gov
@Oz1976 "Did fuel oil systems in WTC 7 contribute to its collapse? No. The building had three separate emergency power systems, all of which ran on diesel fuel. The worst-case scenarios associated with fires being fed by ruptured fuel lines-or from fuel stored in day tanks on the lower floors-could not have been sustained long enough, could not have generated sufficient heat to weaken critical interior columns,
@Oz1976 (cont) "and/or would have produced large amounts of visible smoke from the lower floors, which were not observed. As background information, the three systems contained two 12,000 gallon fuel tanks, and two 6,000 gallon tanks beneath the building's loading docks, and a single 6,000 gallon tank on the 1st floor. In addition one system used a 275 gallon tank on the 5th floor, a 275 gallon tank on the 8th floor, and a 50 gallon tank on the 9th floor.
@Oz1976 (cont) Another system used a 275 gallon day tank on the 7th floor.
Several months after the WTC 7 collapse, a contractor recovered an estimated 23,000 gallons of fuel from these tanks. NIST estimated that the unaccounted fuel totaled 1,000 ±1,000 gallons of fuel (in other words, somewhere between 0 and 2,000 gallons, with 1,000 gallons the most likely figure)."
@Oz1976 That's from NISTs WTC 7 FAQ, on their website. 42,875 total fuel storage capacity in the building with only 1,000 +/- 1000 gallons (1000 gallons being the most likely number) unaccounted for. Even if it was the full 2000 gallons that means that ~95% of the fuel is accounted for.
@Oz1976 "Did fuel oil systems in WTC 7 contribute to its collapse? No." It honestly doesn't get much clearer then that. And not one word about "exploding generators."
@Ahlywog Did I say anything about "Exploding generators" or the 16,000 gallons of diesel fuel for them? Pretty sure I didn't and that's not what I was referring to. Hint genius: Collapse initiation. You clearly don't understand what NIST is saying with regard to it. And I'm quite certain you believe the controlled demolition nonsense. The 911 Commission Reports job was NOT to study WTC 7 at all. You should probably read that book too.
@Oz1976 "that is not what the NIST report says at all. You need to reread it (if you ever did) and try to comprehend exactly what it's saying: wtc.nist.gov" You didn't specify what you were talking about at all. I haven't said anything about controlled demolition or whether or not it was the 911 Commission Reports job to study anything.
@Oz1976 "The 911 Commission Reports job was NOT to study WTC 7 at all."
More bullshit, where do u get this from, dude? Their job was 2 give the fullest possible account of what happened that day. The very fact that u seem 2 believe the collapse of WTC7 is a side-issue here says enough about ur willingness 2 investigate all the facts & all the little details.
I'm sure u cannot even describe (let alone accurately) the position of AE911Truth in this matter. If u think u can, go give it a shot
@Sandberg1972 No it wasn't. Their job: "the 9/11 Commission, was set up on November 27, 2002, "to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks", including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks.
The commission was also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks"
It was not to determine why buildings collapsed. They lack any structural engineering knowledge. Don't be retarded.
@Oz1976 I stand corrected, it was NIST'job to do that.
But can u think of a credible reason to omit WTC7's collapse in their report? I'd like to hear that. Surely WTC7's collapse could be seen as a circumstance surrounding the 911 attacks?
If u think not, then please explain why.
Now, let's see how u're gonna dodge this.
Any clue yet about how to accurately describe the position of AE911Truth yet?
@Sandberg1972 Because it wasn't their job for the 3rd time. I suggest you watch "On Native Soil", the documentary made about the 9/11 Commission Report, it's formation due to pressure from the families (families that had people on the PLANES as well), their mandate, the testimonies and publish of the report.
WTC 7 had no business in the report at all. Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD. Why not ask about WTC 3,4,5, and 6? The World Financial Center? St. Nicholas Church? All destroyed
@Oz1976 "WTC 7 had no business in the report at all." U wish. Funny that u mention no reason why it had no business in the report.
"Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD." Yes it was, a child can see that. That's why it was NOT in the report.
Funny that u should talk about the pressure on the formation of the commission, kinda odd don't u think, that the Bush admin. did not even want an investigation and that it took 441 days to start Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD.
How is it possible that this uniquely horrific event has been subjected to so little rigorous investigation or forensic engineering analysis? And what possible innocent motivation could there be for the great haste with which so much irreplaceable physical evidence was destroyed? Could there be something going on here that is so awful and yet so obvious that any serious investigation would threaten its exposure? I
@TheGirlWhoGames fix you? why should they "fix" you? They have fixed themselves. You're just here to pay your taxes. Less gaming, more reading, I suggest for you.
@TheGirlWhoGames Your "government" is not there to protect you. It just pretends it does, but in fact they serve only a few private individuals who are not into the open. It's not all of the government, just the key positions. The goal of these individuals is to control everything. The murders of these 3000 people, to whom they don't have any allegiance, justified even greater control over the life and took away lot of the freedom of rest of the 300 million. Do you get it now?
y do u dumb asses keep insiting that it was an inside job, do u think ur gonna change something that if u have people say that the complex is just gonna appear i downtown, btw the explosions are gaslines that were under the wtc , cars and parts still falling off the damaged buildings not bombs. until i see a picture of a bomb in the debris i will not be conviced. "Never Forgive , Never Forget '
How the hell you are going to hear at (0:37) "ka-BOOM!!" and keep your eye on the building, it'll be coming down soon" And still can't see how it could be controlled explosives?? I mean we heard eye witnesses say they heard them. Their co-workers hurt from them in WTC 7 and the before the plane even hit WTC 1 or 2!!!!! Even inside the basements of WTC1&2!! Where are the opposite of the truthers (brainwashed-liars) at????
@tiefiter822 look at you tube videos on other building implosions then watch WTC 7 and the other towers coming down. they are all similar and you can see the charges going off in the building.
@Chubbzdabubb well, hey lets not forget the FOUR THOUSAND or so that Bush sent to DIE over in Iraq over something that didnt even exist (WMD anybody??? never did find any, CORRECT???)
@Joefreiheit dude shut the fuck up. All of this conspiracy theories are bull shit. Al queda claimed responsibility for that attack and that shit head osama is the head of it. Talk to the families who had family members or friends lost on that terrible day. Osama bin Laden was teh cause of it all, and he should be the one blamed. Stop trying to blame it all on government conspiracy. Ignorant piece of crap
@cbbatista The huge # of people that would have had to be in on it make it impossible it was "an inside job". Watch/read the NatGeo specials, the Popular mechanics publications and other sources other than your fav conspiracy sources. I think too many 'truthers" focus on that idea and forget to really consider the more obvious explanation. Just give it the same consideration you give the hugely complex conspiracy theories.
@louie2able 1. Relax, that comment was posted two months ago
2. You can't 'grow' brain matter
3. I am sure calling me a dumb fuck really benefits your situation, and makes you the smart one? You do not have to be hurling insults. I got the message from the other 3 comments that told me I was wrong. Take a page from TheMagmagoblin's book and try to correct people instead of riddicule them. It might seem surprising, but it is actually more constructive and is generally more appreiciated.
@Joefreiheit You and the other 6 retards make me laugh.
Have you read the comments where people are like "MORE MORE MORE!" Those are the types of people who joined in on this event.. Some guy was like "Killing people is my justice." Now please tell me, why would the government let billions of people die?
@ZebraPrintSock the fucking government wants us to die! ever heard of the illuminati? bush didnt care how many people he killed...people dont fukn get it...the government lies to us! kills us and silences us!! let me just name a few people....MLK junior...wanted black rights.....killed bob marley:supported peace, killed...JFK:knew about secret societys and supported peace, killed. robert kennedy, wanted to take the troops out of the war, killed, michael jackson, revealed the illuminati, killed.
@ZebraPrintSock michael jackson wanted a better place...he made a song that basically revealed the illuminati....and they killed him....however they did it they made it look like cardiac arrest
@WideAsleep22 IDR what it was called it goes all i really know is that they dont really care about us....he puts the illuminati triangle around is crotch area to let them know suck it basically
@ZebraPrintSock it was not billions of people it was thousands of nameless american the government could'nt give less of shit to gain billions of personal profit and the right to revoke freedom and change the bills of right. and were not counting the war on terror that gave them the right to invade and take what ever they please. freeing the iraqyan people my ass!i they were better of with that psycho Saddam Hussein. use brain and look for yourself except from accepting all the fox feeds u|
@Joefreiheit I can't say that they were 100% demo for sure- have you seen the video where the building turns to dust as it's falling? I think that there was a pretty decent chance directed energy was also used on 9/11, as well as some sort of explosives.
@sanluisskywatch thermo nuclear devices where used for the demolition of the 3 buildings.Thats why the first 300mtr of the towers turned in to dust.only a nuclear explosion is capable fo doing exactly that
fucking cave men i mean im an american born and raised and hopefully will die that way but could any of you ever think that cavmen with there little mocason sandals and communist made kaleshnokuvs could fdo this
since that day, she had had asthma and hated people from other countries, untill her father convinced her not to hate people cuz of one-0r more than one- persons mistake. since then, shes had asthma; and the memory of the violent death of her mom
Dude im so sry for your friend, ye, i had loss on that day too but the story aint exactly that detailed tbh.. but im sry for your friends loss. thanks for sharing with us:)
gonna die first. my friend prayed and prayed. when, just the, she heard another HUGE sound. she realized it was coming down; on her! she knew her mom was probbally already dead, so she figured she would die with her mom. little did she know, her dad started pulling on her shirt to come out. her dad said hurry, but he had to leave cuz of his asthma. she also figured in about 2 minutes, she'd be dead. so she quick hurryed out; with the smoke following her! she had fallen down and got in the smoke.
my friend's mom died in that. my friend was 2 months old. my other friend had a mom and dad who were divorced, and one lived in nevada, the other were this toke place. my friend was was going to visit her mom in her work building, when, all of a sudden, she heard a HUGE explosion, and heard people screaming. she then realized, the building she was in had exploded, and it was soon going to come down, not only on her and her dad, but her mom! her mom was on the top floor, so my friend knew she was
This is worse than the "Tou-Fu"(Bean Curd?) buildings in China. At least those could be explained by corruption. But this is a smudge on American architects and American engineers.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."
( Abraham Lincoln )
Maybe that is why dictators like First Emperor of China rounded up intellectuals and burned the books
This US Army Veteran, who lost friends in those steel death towers, knows Covert Ops when he sees them-Rules of Covert Warfare being applied to civilian population-in this case the American public (sheeple, useless eaters) The notion there were gaping holes in U.S. Air Defense System allowing an asymmetrical attack of this nature is preposterous. What the hell is NORAD for? Mr. VP Cheney where were U on 9-11 BEFORE the impacts?
) For those unaware WTC7 was Hq for CIA-FBI-Secret Service on 9/11. This is the heart of the intelligence community in NYC-they had total vision of Operational Theatre. This US Army Vet wants to believe the official version of events, however knowledge, scientific fact, eyewitness testimony and common sense prevail-We were lied to yet again. The Op was staged in their front yard w/media as ring announcers.
0:35-0:41 KaBoom-Boom "Did you hear that?" <-- the guy that said that with the pipe wrench over his shoulder.. is he a firefighter or a Control Demo guy? The after he said that, someone else says "Keep an eye on that building it's coming down soon" <-- he had advance notice; who is he and where did he get that info from?
GunClingingPalin 1 month ago 22
nice demo job. very fast! Nesara now!
dcmann2112 2 months ago
Silverstein is as bad as Bush and Cheney !! How convenient that in July of 2001 he redid his insurance to insure the WTC for $7,000.000,000.00 adn against Terrorist Attack !!!! Hmmm.... I smell a little weasel !!!
robbob100 3 months ago
@robbob100 he did not redo his insurance, His lease was up so he released it for 99 years, and like any lease for anything its required by law to have full coverage insurance.
MegaYeshua33 3 months ago
@robbob100 Do you REALLY think ANY insurance company is going to pay off the claim if it's not legit? Insurance companies are not a bunch of fools.
DeedsResearcher 2 months ago
@robbob100 the prperty was worth half that. he made out like a bandit.
indyfan22k 1 month ago
Who are the guys in blue helmets and gray shirts? Demolition crew??
ThisWeekInFascism 4 months ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
911 = MOSSAD JOB
Modern day Lavon Affair
donovan93123 4 months ago
i just farted
NationQuebec 5 months ago
@NationQuebec dude fuck you to say something like that on a video like this
j4ward95 5 months ago
LOL any doofus thats investingated 9 11 for an hour can clearly tell that the official story of the attacks is such bullshit
brownspottedbanana 5 months ago
@brownspottedbanana says the retard
daveygravey123456 5 months ago
@brownspottedbanana The fact you said "investingated" clearly shows your level of intelligence. Not only is it spelt "investigated", since when has a Google and Youtube search constituted investigation?Perhaps try talking to the people who were actually there and witnessed the events first hand
Your only uploaded video is of a cat eating meat, so I assume you are mentally challenged. It says you are from Marshall Island, so must be inbreeding or the result of the radiation from US nuclear tests
Lostkiwi123 5 months ago
@Lostkiwi123 the fact that i have a life and dont spend alot of time on the internet explains that. and when i am online talking to retards that think buildings steel buildings collapse with fire, it doesn't really matter if i spell all this shit right because you forgot a couple perioids.
the pentagon is the most secure and guarded building in the world, and only one cheap video was released of it that didn't even clearly show anything, they are holding recordings form 84 other cameras.
brownspottedbanana 5 months ago
watch?v=Odp1FO0Vmuw
SunTzu1983 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=-3zBGL40orc
SunTzu1983 6 months ago
watch?v=TNXqkZO3Y1g
SunTzu1983 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all those cops and fireman in there probably ended up dying... my father was fatally wounded in the north tower. i joined the United States Marine Corp for revenge. i miss you dad ill bring you justice
FemaleMarine1 6 months ago
these are chaos times, how could they suddenly plan a controlled demolition??
mebagtilay41287 6 months ago
Jews job
theRockOfFaith2 8 months ago
NIST on their own documented admission did not do any sort of test for explosives. But that is their primary responsibility! Lets not forget that.
smacl61 10 months ago
A whole lot of paranoid delusional whack jobs posting on here.
911 was an outside job
Bush is too stupid to be an evil mastermind
There is no evil plot on the governments side
You all need to come back to reality.
No REAL science backs any Controlled Demolition
Not one "truther" has any whitepapers published in any respected scientific journal, they were so scared to try, they paid Bentham to publish without peer review and then created their own "journal" to have carte blanche.
Oz1976 10 months ago
@Oz1976 Thank you, at last an intelligent post one of the few on here.
hornetgags 9 months ago
This was the work of the US gov.
louie2able 11 months ago
and eisteen... various scared people saying random thoughts in an area of mass confusion, fires, airplanes smashing into buildings around them, etc are hardly smoking guns dude. People try to gain SOME control over horrible situations and saying things like that gives them a small feeling of, "ok, I know whats gonna happen next.."
shane1v 1 year ago
@Chokermax FACT: Diesel generators in the building caught fire and exploded throughout the day, damage from falling debris also aided in weakening the structure. How the building was constructed (framing) it aided with HOW the structure collapsed. Witness reports and video support these claims.
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
@ERAUPRCWA No, no that isn't a fact. No official report has ever said anything about exploding generators. Generators do not explode anyways. It would have been the fuel tanks exploding and NIST has already stated that 95% of the fuel in those tanks has been accounted for and that the fuel oil contributed nothing to the collapse of the building. FACT: Saying "FACT:" before imparting information does not make said information a fact.
Ahlywog 9 months ago
They admitted they used explosions for WTC 7 because the fire was to big and it would be to dangerous to just let it burn to the ground so they evacuated the building and took it down
ItsBrandonNow 1 year ago
@ItsBrandonNow I remember that interview...
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
I heard World trade centre 7s steel frame was melted.. which is imposible for Fire to perform.. explosives HAD to be used
admiralYulauren101 1 year ago
@admiralYulauren101 explosives weren't used but several diesel generators in the building was... When it comes down to it, the building did come down because of fire. The Diesel generators caught fire and burned throughout the day and after hours, they started to explode (people reported explosions and loud booms) because of how the WTC7 was built the structure couldn't maintain itself and collapsed after several hours of burning and explosions. NOT A CONSPIRACY JUST BAD CONSTRUCTION.
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
@ERAUPRCWA oh! wow! wer did u hear that?
admiralYulauren101 1 year ago
@admiralYulauren101 prior to 9/11 there was a program on TLC about the WTC I remember watching how the buildings were constructed and so on. After 9/11 many programs came on about the collapse also doing research on what happened especially with WT7, it was reported explosions throughout the day and fires, people were told NOT to go downstairs on the main floor b/c most of the generators were there, on fire, & were exploding. put two & two together, explosions and fire caused the build. to fall
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
@admiralYulauren101 you heard wrong, nothing was melted, now the frames were weakened but not melted. yes there were explosions but not what you're thinking... check out "9/11 Debunked: WTC 7's Collapse Explained" here on youtube, now I didn't use this as MY ONLY source (that's just stupid) but the information that this person found is the same information that I received when I was learning about the WTC complex and it's destruction.
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
It was a constructed demolition. A building doesn't just crumble, the foundation would make it so the building would fall over, Not crumble.
TheRaunchyTofu 1 year ago
@Chokermax debri smart one
Chubbzdabubb 1 year ago
What about the Verizon building, a Greek Church, and another Federal building?? Why didn't these other buildings catch on fire from the 1 and 2 towers falling on them and collapse as the WTC 7 did hours later?
billyfan8305 1 year ago
If the bombs were planted in the basement, the tower would not have fallen from top down.
lumpymichael 1 year ago
google debunking 911 to enlight yourself.. The truth is out there
DonArsuk84 1 year ago
well the boss of the world trade center said that the fire department called him and said they can't contain the fire and he said just pull it so they demolished it
kidkong584 1 year ago
Where is HONEST Abe when we need him?
3491olivia 1 year ago
planned by the united states...
ClarZLarson 1 year ago
Hi look, there is no way that if i plane crash into a building, that it collapses and just fall straight to the ground, it falls over if a plane crash into it... if you put special bombs or something in the ground just under the building that is holding up the building, then it falls like that.
jontizz96 1 year ago
if the twin towers fell the moment they got hit there would have been alot more deaths :/
hockly1 1 year ago
Building 7 collapsed with demolitions. You can clearly see that by the way it collapses.
Jazzel93 1 year ago
@Jazzel93 stop with the conspiracies, find out about how the building was constructed and what was inside of the building. It was concluded that the building collapsed because of fire... that conclusion is very true once you do the research on what I said.
ERAUPRCWA 1 year ago
@ERAUPRCWA What research is that? The time has come my friend, to start thinking for urself, and don't let others sell u some stupid ass bullshit. Stick to easy logical verifiable facts. There is not a shred of evidence explaining the sudden complete failure of ALL remaining columns, maybe u should read NIST's report again to find out. Good luck!
Sandberg1972 11 months ago
@Sandberg1972 the research conducted by the 911 commission and independent analyst. They concluded that fire caused the collapse. Due to damage and fire from WTC 1 and 2, it spread fires throughout the building. The subsequent explosions heard throughout the day were from diesel generators located throughout the building which were on fire all day. The explosions blew out columns and weakened the structure to collapse. You can see the building tresses collapse prior to the main collapse.
ERAUPRCWA 11 months ago
@ERAUPRCWA Maybe u should take another hard look at that 911-Omission report, and first notice that the collapse of WTC7 wasn't even mentioned with a single word. Go ahead & check that 1st. NIST's report on WTC7 came out in I believe 2008 or 2009, way after the 911-Comm. report. There's no proof of how the fires got started in WTC7, there're reports that fires were burning already before WTC1 collapsed. Ur dieselgenerator explosions do not have a shred of evidence supporting it, if so, show me.
Sandberg1972 11 months ago
@ERAUPRCWA Also check all these so-called "independant analysts", & who they work for, see the conflicting interests they have. Or check Kevin Ryan's articles for this. What u're claiming are all things that are not supported by any evidence. Also u haven't presented anything that deals with the sudden complete failure of all remaining steel columns. That's not so strange of course, because u can't. Just like NIST couldn't. There's only ONE explanation for something like this, take 1 wild guess.
Sandberg1972 11 months ago
@Sandberg1972 this is youtube, presenting a purely academic debate on this topical issue is impossible. The facts are there to back up the claims of no conspiracy. Conspiracy theorist see what they want, even when the facts behind it prove otherwise...for example, there are people who believe UA175 was a missile b/c of how it looked on video, but based off the United Airlines paint scheme circa 2001 on the 767-200 it totally disproves those claims, but conspiracy theorist still don't believe it
ERAUPRCWA 11 months ago
@ERAUPRCWA The facts are here that back up every possibility of government involvement in 9/11, and even more at covering up the events afterwards. The media is obviously complicit in keeping all the evidence out of the view of the public. U can bring "UA175 was actually a missile" into the discussion, but that just shows u don't have answers to the issues I brought up, just like NIST don't have any answers to them, let alone credible ones.Check the 911-Comm. report, WTC7 is not even mentioned.
Sandberg1972 11 months ago
@Sandberg1972
I sincerely hope YOU don't think UA175 was a missile. If you do, then you're a real shitter: what about those people who were actually on those REAL planes, and their families?
AETutorials42 9 months ago
@AETutorials42 No i don not think UA175 was a missile however, I believe there's no definite proof that the airplane hitting WTC2 was actually UA175. I don't believe in missiles hitting the Towers, there's no evidence for it.
And u have to be careful about those people on the planes, that also is not 100% confirmed in my mind. I don't buy into all kinds of DNA-identification by the Army that easily, they can claim whatever they want, no one will be able to verify it.
Sandberg1972 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972 The fact their families say they're dead and they're not walking this earth doesn't confirm it? I suggest you go watch On Native Soil and call all those families you had members on flight 175, 11, 93 and 77 liars. I fucking dare you. I can't verify that god DOESNT exist, but I sure as hell don't see any proof of existence either. I don't fully understand thermal expansion, but i'll take the experts words for it, cause ya know, they're experts. 911 was an outside job.
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Oz1976 U need to read a bit more precise. I wrote that I'm not ruling voicemorphing out. Of course these people are dead, duh!
And u just take "the experts' " word for it, especially when they didn't investigate ANY physical evidence (which was illegally destroyed asap), but relied SOLELY on computersimulations, the inputdata of which is UNaccessible to anyone but NIST. I'll just stick 2 the 1500+ courageous A&E's and my own common sense. U just stick to a single beam causing a total collapse
Sandberg1972 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972 No it wasn't. That's a 9/11 Myth MEME. The steel was all investigated by several organizations including members of the ASCE, NIST, FEMA, CDI, and ImplosionWorld. It was not solely computer sims. That's ridiculous. Stop...just stop, and do some ACTUAL research NOT FROM A TRUTHER SITE.1500 courageous A&E's? Dude they're WHACKO's. That's 1500 WORLDWIDE. Guess how many engineers are EMPLOYED in the US alone (of which I am one): 1,600,000. Architects? 140,000. Do the math.
Oz1976 8 months ago
@Oz1976 U clueless idiot, No steel from WTC7 was investigated, because it wasn't there anymore, it was shipped oversees asap, remember?
Only FEMA examined ONE piece of steel (the "swiss cheese" piece, remember?) of WTC7.
Why don't u start checking ur own f..king NIST-reports that u rely on so much? Hell u don't even know what's in it and what's not.
Explain the 1500 wacko's conspiracy for me please. How many A&E's have seen WTC7 collapse u think? Take a wild guess u fool.
Sandberg1972 8 months ago
@Sandberg1972 No it's you who's a clueless idiot, regurgitating 8 year old MEMEs and nothing more. FEMA? They did a BRIEF investigation and then turned it over to the professionals of the ASCE and SEAoNY you dumb mother fucker. None of the steel was shipped overseas ASAP you fucking twat.
(911myths.com/index.php/Recycled_Steel)
You still don't have a clue about AE911Truth (DICK Gages money Scam) How many of them are civil or structural engineers? Here's a hint, can count them on my fingers
Oz1976 8 months ago
@Oz1976 Didn't I ask u already to please elaborate on Richard Gage's money scam? Did he just all of a sudden went crazy and decided to look for other A&E's to try and convince them that they should join him in his moneyscam? What kind of sick fuck would Richard Gage be, to do such thing?
& what kind of proof do you have that there are less than 10 civil or structural engineers on that petitionlist?
And ahhh, the "the steel was inspected"-cover, how nice. Just the "right" beams of course
Sandberg1972 8 months ago
@Sandberg1972 You're an idiot. You realize you can see exactly who is what in their petition right? Here's some help you dolt: (www2 .ae911truth. org/signpetition . php) It has EXACTLY what their degree is in. Of the 1507, only 1400 are currently licensed. Gage only has a BACHELOR's of Arch. His business was shit, he caught on to 9/11 through Steven Jones. He makes over $80,000 from AE911Truth (33% of the orgs income FYI). This is all easilly researched but you're too dumb to figure it out.
Oz1976 8 months ago
@Oz1976 Wow! 80,000 a year??? Are u serious? That much? Wow, well since it's his one and only job right know it's uhhhh...wait a minute...80,000 a year u say? That's damn little for an architect.
Seriously, if u're trying to downplay his expertise by insinuating he JUST only has a bachelor's of Arch., and therefore he's not qualified as an expert, well go ahead. If it works for u.
But man, 80 grand a year, what a poor scam!!! LOL!
The nerve of that man Gage, how dare he? :)
Sandberg1972 8 months ago
@Sandberg1972 It is his only job. He closed his failed architecture firm to concentrate solely on ae911truth getting free trips to europe to preach his bullshit. He has no masters' or secondary architectural degree's aside of his BS. His company was a failure. Look it up. Now he get's to preach nonsense (go on debates and drop cardboard onto cardboard as if it's an accurate demonstration) and drink pina colada's on the house. It IS damn little for an architect, atleast one that's intelligent.
Oz1976 8 months ago
@Sandberg1972 (continued) OH SHIT You're an ALex Jones flunky!!!! No wonder. Charlie Sheen is batshit crazy dude. What exactly are the "tough questions" you allude to in your bio? Facts are facts and 9/11 Truth has ZERO facts. 10 years later no whistleblowers. 10 years from a government that couldn't keep a lid on a sperm shot on a dress. 10 years of failure. "thermite" paper debunking itself. Dick Gage going apeshit crazy on Hardfire. Yeah. You go ahead and believe that 1/10th of 1% of A & E's.
Oz1976 8 months ago
@AETutorials42 Also, I haven't ruled out voicemorphing 100%, but it's a long shot indeed. But given the importance of those hijacking one has to be careful. As little as possible would've been left to chance by the people who planned this operation.
I'm not a shitter :-) , I'm just someone who knows when he's been lied to, especially when it's so goddamn obvious.
Sandberg1972 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972
You ARE a shitter, by the way. That goes without saying, regardless of whether you think UA175 was a missile. If you knew when you were being lied to, you would stop believing in conspiracy theories, because they are untrue, and unproven, and even when they THINK they've been proven (like 9/11), those bullshit theories have been disproved by intelligent people. RKOwens4. Nuff said.
AETutorials42 9 months ago
@AETutorials42 Thanx for that mate. Now go back to sleep, enjoy ur stay in fantasyland, hosted by RKOwens4.
Keep ignoring the facts, it'll help staying there.
Do not check what u've been told, just believe everything they throw at u, u know they always tell the truth from experience, right?
Nightynight!
Sandberg1972 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972
Well, obviously you haven't watched any of his videos because you are far too egotistical to pull your head out of your ass. I think you're a sheep, herded by the glorious dickhead Alex Jones and his little buddies. RKOwens4 isn't "they" - he's not part of the government, or "the enemy", in your paranoid little bullshit world. He's personally took it as his job to research every conspiracy theory behind 9/11, and destroy them with the real facts, and he has. Wake up.
AETutorials42 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972 the only one living in a fantasy is you sir. You're nothing more than a sheep to the 9/11 profiteering scam. It's you ignoriing facts. We have checked what we've been told, you haven't. You blindly believe in mythical thermite (PAINT AND PRIMER CHIPS FYI), you blindly believe in Controlled Demolition of the towers (NOT EVEN YOUR WHITE KNIGHT DANNY JOWENKO BELIEVES THAT), you blindly follow nutjobs like Alex Jones, Jim Fetzer, Judy Wood, Jason Bermas, David Ray Griffin, etc etc.
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972 Voicemorphing? Lied to? About what exactly? You're talking about a conspiracy that would include 1000's if not 100's of 1000's of people and yet, 10 years later, not one of them with a fucking conscience? Not one of them sickened by what happened that day and the wars since? Are you fucking deluded? Please provide a clear, concise, and complete narrative of what you think happened that day. There was no CD. There was no inside job. We were fucking attacked by terrorists.
Oz1976 9 months ago
@ERAUPRCWA Yeah I'm with Sandberg on this one. The 911 report says nothing about WTC 7 and NIST has never said anything about "exploding generators" or their contribution to the collapse of the building. Instead they have stated that 95% of the fuel oil stored in WTC 7 is accounted for and thus contributed nothing to the collapse. NIST attributes the collapse of WTC 7 to fires causing one of the core columns to walk off its base initiation a progressive collapse.
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Ahlywog that is not what the NIST report says at all. You need to reread it (if you ever did) and try to comprehend exactly what it's saying: wtc.nist.gov
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Oz1976 "Did fuel oil systems in WTC 7 contribute to its collapse? No. The building had three separate emergency power systems, all of which ran on diesel fuel. The worst-case scenarios associated with fires being fed by ruptured fuel lines-or from fuel stored in day tanks on the lower floors-could not have been sustained long enough, could not have generated sufficient heat to weaken critical interior columns,
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Oz1976 (cont) "and/or would have produced large amounts of visible smoke from the lower floors, which were not observed. As background information, the three systems contained two 12,000 gallon fuel tanks, and two 6,000 gallon tanks beneath the building's loading docks, and a single 6,000 gallon tank on the 1st floor. In addition one system used a 275 gallon tank on the 5th floor, a 275 gallon tank on the 8th floor, and a 50 gallon tank on the 9th floor.
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Oz1976 (cont) Another system used a 275 gallon day tank on the 7th floor.
Several months after the WTC 7 collapse, a contractor recovered an estimated 23,000 gallons of fuel from these tanks. NIST estimated that the unaccounted fuel totaled 1,000 ±1,000 gallons of fuel (in other words, somewhere between 0 and 2,000 gallons, with 1,000 gallons the most likely figure)."
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Oz1976 That's from NISTs WTC 7 FAQ, on their website. 42,875 total fuel storage capacity in the building with only 1,000 +/- 1000 gallons (1000 gallons being the most likely number) unaccounted for. Even if it was the full 2000 gallons that means that ~95% of the fuel is accounted for.
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Oz1976 "Did fuel oil systems in WTC 7 contribute to its collapse? No." It honestly doesn't get much clearer then that. And not one word about "exploding generators."
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Ahlywog Did I say anything about "Exploding generators" or the 16,000 gallons of diesel fuel for them? Pretty sure I didn't and that's not what I was referring to. Hint genius: Collapse initiation. You clearly don't understand what NIST is saying with regard to it. And I'm quite certain you believe the controlled demolition nonsense. The 911 Commission Reports job was NOT to study WTC 7 at all. You should probably read that book too.
Oz1976 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Oz1976 "that is not what the NIST report says at all. You need to reread it (if you ever did) and try to comprehend exactly what it's saying: wtc.nist.gov" You didn't specify what you were talking about at all. I haven't said anything about controlled demolition or whether or not it was the 911 Commission Reports job to study anything.
Ahlywog 9 months ago
@Oz1976 "The 911 Commission Reports job was NOT to study WTC 7 at all."
More bullshit, where do u get this from, dude? Their job was 2 give the fullest possible account of what happened that day. The very fact that u seem 2 believe the collapse of WTC7 is a side-issue here says enough about ur willingness 2 investigate all the facts & all the little details.
I'm sure u cannot even describe (let alone accurately) the position of AE911Truth in this matter. If u think u can, go give it a shot
Sandberg1972 9 months ago
@Sandberg1972 No it wasn't. Their job: "the 9/11 Commission, was set up on November 27, 2002, "to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks", including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks.
The commission was also mandated to provide recommendations designed to guard against future attacks"
It was not to determine why buildings collapsed. They lack any structural engineering knowledge. Don't be retarded.
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Oz1976 I stand corrected, it was NIST'job to do that.
But can u think of a credible reason to omit WTC7's collapse in their report? I'd like to hear that. Surely WTC7's collapse could be seen as a circumstance surrounding the 911 attacks?
If u think not, then please explain why.
Now, let's see how u're gonna dodge this.
Any clue yet about how to accurately describe the position of AE911Truth yet?
Sandberg1972 8 months ago
@Sandberg1972 Because it wasn't their job for the 3rd time. I suggest you watch "On Native Soil", the documentary made about the 9/11 Commission Report, it's formation due to pressure from the families (families that had people on the PLANES as well), their mandate, the testimonies and publish of the report.
WTC 7 had no business in the report at all. Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD. Why not ask about WTC 3,4,5, and 6? The World Financial Center? St. Nicholas Church? All destroyed
Oz1976 8 months ago
@Oz1976 "WTC 7 had no business in the report at all." U wish. Funny that u mention no reason why it had no business in the report.
"Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD." Yes it was, a child can see that. That's why it was NOT in the report.
Funny that u should talk about the pressure on the formation of the commission, kinda odd don't u think, that the Bush admin. did not even want an investigation and that it took 441 days to start Why are you hung up on it? It was not a CD.
Sandberg1972 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How is it possible that this uniquely horrific event has been subjected to so little rigorous investigation or forensic engineering analysis? And what possible innocent motivation could there be for the great haste with which so much irreplaceable physical evidence was destroyed? Could there be something going on here that is so awful and yet so obvious that any serious investigation would threaten its exposure? I
wild0hawk 1 year ago
An inside job with only one reason: OIL...
JastheZ 1 year ago
@JastheZ and....... Israel.
FaganRoberts 1 year ago
An inside job with only one reason: OIL...
JastheZ 1 year ago
Comment removed
bigdirtyphil 1 year ago
r people stupid? inside jobs? the government can't fix us so they kill us and start a never ending war? wow...they sure are smart!
TheGirlWhoGames 1 year ago
@TheGirlWhoGames fix you? why should they "fix" you? They have fixed themselves. You're just here to pay your taxes. Less gaming, more reading, I suggest for you.
Kinkoyaburi 1 year ago
@Kinkoyaburi let me ask you this. Why kill 3000 of own people to start a war? hmm? What benefit does that give us? Absolutely nothing.
TheGirlWhoGames 1 year ago
@TheGirlWhoGames Your "government" is not there to protect you. It just pretends it does, but in fact they serve only a few private individuals who are not into the open. It's not all of the government, just the key positions. The goal of these individuals is to control everything. The murders of these 3000 people, to whom they don't have any allegiance, justified even greater control over the life and took away lot of the freedom of rest of the 300 million. Do you get it now?
Kinkoyaburi 1 year ago
y do u dumb asses keep insiting that it was an inside job, do u think ur gonna change something that if u have people say that the complex is just gonna appear i downtown, btw the explosions are gaslines that were under the wtc , cars and parts still falling off the damaged buildings not bombs. until i see a picture of a bomb in the debris i will not be conviced. "Never Forgive , Never Forget '
agargiso 1 year ago
How the hell you are going to hear at (0:37) "ka-BOOM!!" and keep your eye on the building, it'll be coming down soon" And still can't see how it could be controlled explosives?? I mean we heard eye witnesses say they heard them. Their co-workers hurt from them in WTC 7 and the before the plane even hit WTC 1 or 2!!!!! Even inside the basements of WTC1&2!! Where are the opposite of the truthers (brainwashed-liars) at????
demariojason 1 year ago
All 3 WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.
Joefreiheit 2 years ago 7
@Joefreiheit how? huh? how would YOU know????
tiefiter822 1 year ago
@tiefiter822 look at you tube videos on other building implosions then watch WTC 7 and the other towers coming down. they are all similar and you can see the charges going off in the building.
gutaplayer 1 year ago
@Joefreiheit OMFG did they just fucking forget that there were 3000+ people in there
people like you and the 8 likes are wastes of human shit
Chubbzdabubb 1 year ago
@Chubbzdabubb well, hey lets not forget the FOUR THOUSAND or so that Bush sent to DIE over in Iraq over something that didnt even exist (WMD anybody??? never did find any, CORRECT???)
billyfan8305 1 year ago
@Joefreiheit There were 7 buildings...!
Sonikclaw2 1 year ago
@Joefreiheit stupidity
AdrielC877 1 year ago
@Joefreiheit dude shut the fuck up. All of this conspiracy theories are bull shit. Al queda claimed responsibility for that attack and that shit head osama is the head of it. Talk to the families who had family members or friends lost on that terrible day. Osama bin Laden was teh cause of it all, and he should be the one blamed. Stop trying to blame it all on government conspiracy. Ignorant piece of crap
A1r93 1 year ago
@A1r93 Majority of the victims families don't beleive the official story.
Open your eyes, sheep.
cbbatista 1 year ago
@cbbatista The huge # of people that would have had to be in on it make it impossible it was "an inside job". Watch/read the NatGeo specials, the Popular mechanics publications and other sources other than your fav conspiracy sources. I think too many 'truthers" focus on that idea and forget to really consider the more obvious explanation. Just give it the same consideration you give the hugely complex conspiracy theories.
shane1v 1 year ago
@A1r93 Al Queda did not in fact claim responsibility.
TheMagmagoblin 11 months ago
@A1r93 Al Queda did not in fact claim responsibility. Osama Bin Laden praised the attacks but denied responsibility.
TheMagmagoblin 11 months ago
@A1r93 You're one dumb fuck if you believe the 'official' accounting. Try growing some brain matter and do a little research, jackass.
louie2able 11 months ago
@louie2able 1. Relax, that comment was posted two months ago
2. You can't 'grow' brain matter
3. I am sure calling me a dumb fuck really benefits your situation, and makes you the smart one? You do not have to be hurling insults. I got the message from the other 3 comments that told me I was wrong. Take a page from TheMagmagoblin's book and try to correct people instead of riddicule them. It might seem surprising, but it is actually more constructive and is generally more appreiciated.
A1r93 11 months ago
Comment removed
juliopm11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Joefreiheit Prove it!!!
juliopm11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Joefreiheit fuck you conspiracy theorist...
reloaditfast 1 year ago
@Joefreiheit no they weren't
Oz1976 10 months ago
@Joefreiheit You and the other 6 retards make me laugh.
Have you read the comments where people are like "MORE MORE MORE!" Those are the types of people who joined in on this event.. Some guy was like "Killing people is my justice." Now please tell me, why would the government let billions of people die?
ZebraPrintSock 8 months ago
@ZebraPrintSock the fucking government wants us to die! ever heard of the illuminati? bush didnt care how many people he killed...people dont fukn get it...the government lies to us! kills us and silences us!! let me just name a few people....MLK junior...wanted black rights.....killed bob marley:supported peace, killed...JFK:knew about secret societys and supported peace, killed. robert kennedy, wanted to take the troops out of the war, killed, michael jackson, revealed the illuminati, killed.
METHODMAN4EVA 6 months ago
@METHODMAN4EVA Have you ever heard of assassination? And what the fuck, Michael Jackson dies of cardiac arrest. -.-
ZebraPrintSock 6 months ago
@ZebraPrintSock michael jackson wanted a better place...he made a song that basically revealed the illuminati....and they killed him....however they did it they made it look like cardiac arrest
METHODMAN4EVA 6 months ago
@METHODMAN4EVA Keep believing what you want. Idgaf.
ZebraPrintSock 6 months ago
@METHODMAN4EVA what song?
WideAsleep22 6 months ago
@WideAsleep22 IDR what it was called it goes all i really know is that they dont really care about us....he puts the illuminati triangle around is crotch area to let them know suck it basically
METHODMAN4EVA 5 months ago
@ZebraPrintSock it was not billions of people it was thousands of nameless american the government could'nt give less of shit to gain billions of personal profit and the right to revoke freedom and change the bills of right. and were not counting the war on terror that gave them the right to invade and take what ever they please. freeing the iraqyan people my ass!i they were better of with that psycho Saddam Hussein. use brain and look for yourself except from accepting all the fox feeds u|
pokemedead 5 months ago
@ZebraPrintSock What do you mean, billions?
wakaw07 3 months ago
Comment removed
dirrtysteve89 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZebraPrintSock
2819 people died in the wtc collapse, almost 100,000 civilians died in iraq which was directly motivated by this.
dirrtysteve89 3 months ago
@Joefreiheit I can't say that they were 100% demo for sure- have you seen the video where the building turns to dust as it's falling? I think that there was a pretty decent chance directed energy was also used on 9/11, as well as some sort of explosives.
sanluisskywatch 7 months ago
@sanluisskywatch thermo nuclear devices where used for the demolition of the 3 buildings.Thats why the first 300mtr of the towers turned in to dust.only a nuclear explosion is capable fo doing exactly that
kromdolk 7 months ago
fucking cave men i mean im an american born and raised and hopefully will die that way but could any of you ever think that cavmen with there little mocason sandals and communist made kaleshnokuvs could fdo this
SaLTLiFe4TL 2 years ago
R.I.P... this will effect the relationships with other countries forever
pimmlott08 2 years ago
since that day, she had had asthma and hated people from other countries, untill her father convinced her not to hate people cuz of one-0r more than one- persons mistake. since then, shes had asthma; and the memory of the violent death of her mom
lovetaffypretty6 2 years ago
Dude im so sry for your friend, ye, i had loss on that day too but the story aint exactly that detailed tbh.. but im sry for your friends loss. thanks for sharing with us:)
Sarcosho177 2 years ago
gonna die first. my friend prayed and prayed. when, just the, she heard another HUGE sound. she realized it was coming down; on her! she knew her mom was probbally already dead, so she figured she would die with her mom. little did she know, her dad started pulling on her shirt to come out. her dad said hurry, but he had to leave cuz of his asthma. she also figured in about 2 minutes, she'd be dead. so she quick hurryed out; with the smoke following her! she had fallen down and got in the smoke.
lovetaffypretty6 2 years ago
my friend's mom died in that. my friend was 2 months old. my other friend had a mom and dad who were divorced, and one lived in nevada, the other were this toke place. my friend was was going to visit her mom in her work building, when, all of a sudden, she heard a HUGE explosion, and heard people screaming. she then realized, the building she was in had exploded, and it was soon going to come down, not only on her and her dad, but her mom! her mom was on the top floor, so my friend knew she was
lovetaffypretty6 2 years ago
Building 7 collapsed without a plane hitting it.
This is worse than the "Tou-Fu"(Bean Curd?) buildings in China. At least those could be explained by corruption. But this is a smudge on American architects and American engineers.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."
( Abraham Lincoln )
Maybe that is why dictators like First Emperor of China rounded up intellectuals and burned the books
CommanderUTube 2 years ago
This US Army Veteran, who lost friends in those steel death towers, knows Covert Ops when he sees them-Rules of Covert Warfare being applied to civilian population-in this case the American public (sheeple, useless eaters) The notion there were gaping holes in U.S. Air Defense System allowing an asymmetrical attack of this nature is preposterous. What the hell is NORAD for? Mr. VP Cheney where were U on 9-11 BEFORE the impacts?
intheknow7 2 years ago 2
) For those unaware WTC7 was Hq for CIA-FBI-Secret Service on 9/11. This is the heart of the intelligence community in NYC-they had total vision of Operational Theatre. This US Army Vet wants to believe the official version of events, however knowledge, scientific fact, eyewitness testimony and common sense prevail-We were lied to yet again. The Op was staged in their front yard w/media as ring announcers.
intheknow7 2 years ago 6
I was in there!
Floppy98x42 2 years ago
sike!!
Egskater2000 2 years ago