@q1mera1 Graham's may be the largest number in a "mat problem", but since when is being used in mathematics a necessary prerequisite for a number to be well-defined and extremely large. What kinds of numbers are larger than Graham's? Well there's a "tetratri" for starters, then an "iteral", a "goobol", my own number "godgahlah", a "xappol", a "terossol", a "gongulus", and a "goppatoth", ... and I could theoretically go further but it get's difficult to prove well-foundedness.
As a googologist I'd be woefully disappointed if this was the largest number, it's way too freakin' small! And even Graham's Number is tiny compare to the numbers googologists work with today.
@lordswit6666 the problem goes deeper than not having enough names. In fact we do have enough names... one can simply read out the digits of any whole number. The problem is there are only a finite number of such names we can say/write and an infinite number we can not. But this also goes for decimal notation, power towers, up arrows, chain arrows, array notation etc. In otherwords, not only do we not have enough words, we don't even have enough mathematics to define all numbers...
wow i dont really like math and im not planning to like it in anyway.. but i have to learn.. the thing is.. we can always add another number.. the only limitation i know about number is that we can be short of the names.. but we cant be short of numbers.. we can use all the names to call a new amount.. but still we can also add 999 and we have another problem to name it
Even a googolplex, famed very small large number, is much greater. This is easy to prove. e^pi < 24 and e < pi < 10 . 794,843,294,078,147,843,293.7(3) < 10^21. Therefore the number is less than (10^21)*(10^(10^24) < 10^(10^25) < 10^(10^100). Therefore its less than a googolplex. Using logs its easy to show that the number has about 138,732,019,350 digits. This means its actually less than 10^(10^12) :)
I'm afraid that your calculations are incorrect, Grahams number is soo much bigger than your number, due to your number having a recurring endpoint it is no bigger than 10 divided by 3 for instance. the largest whole number is still Grahams number. your number is as close to Grahams number as the number 1 is to infinity.
Nine hundred ninty-nine dectillion, nine hundred ninty-nine nontillion, nine hundred ninety-nine octillion, nine hundred ninety-nine heptillion, nine hundred ninety-nine hextillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quadrillion, nine hundred ninety-nine trillion, nine hundred ninety-nine billion, nine hundred ninety-nine million, nine hundred ninety-nine thousand, nine hundred ninety-nine. That's a way bigger number then on the video and you can still add 1 forever.
More interesting... Is a number that is right at the threshold of comprehensible, and not comprehensible. One that you can toy around with, as though you were so damn close to harnessing its magnitude.
For example. 10 to the 10 to the 10. At first, it seems like 10,000,000,000 raised to the 10. But no, it's 10 raised to 10,000,000,000 zeros.
You can visualize this. By understanding how many different paths a signal can travel in your brain of several billion neurons. Try (10^10^10^10).
What bout' an 8 instead of 7, like so: ->8<-94,843,294,078,147,843,293.73333... X e to the power of TT to the power of e to the power of TT? Or what bout' googol? Or what bout' googolplex, or graham's number?
ummmmm. for an equation in 7th grade, i got a higher number. i documented it. it was 945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,682,846,734.6 (946 Heptillion) i was like 'what the fuck?' the number repeats itself! i cant remember the formula! :( so long
@q1mera1 There. I've given you 8 named numbers larger than Graham's, and not one of them of any use in "serious mathematics" whatsoever!
SbiisSaibian 4 days ago
@q1mera1 Graham's may be the largest number in a "mat problem", but since when is being used in mathematics a necessary prerequisite for a number to be well-defined and extremely large. What kinds of numbers are larger than Graham's? Well there's a "tetratri" for starters, then an "iteral", a "goobol", my own number "godgahlah", a "xappol", a "terossol", a "gongulus", and a "goppatoth", ... and I could theoretically go further but it get's difficult to prove well-foundedness.
SbiisSaibian 4 days ago
As a googologist I'd be woefully disappointed if this was the largest number, it's way too freakin' small! And even Graham's Number is tiny compare to the numbers googologists work with today.
SbiisSaibian 2 weeks ago
@SbiisSaibian what kind of numbers are that? graham's number is the largest used in a mat problem
q1mera1 5 days ago in playlist Large Numbers
clearly you havent heard of graham's number... i hope this was a joke. i think so... a little hard to tell. lol
103kon 1 month ago
the highest number is zero, think about it
nubfail 2 months ago
794,843,294,078,147,843,293??????
vwerlingyahoocom 2 months ago
Did Graham's number just get a big "fuck you"?
TheElectricDreamer93 6 months ago
I've got a dog that looks like a meerkat plus 1 - 2 x a googolplex of grahams. Is this a big number or just plain B.S. who knows??
camelfoot64 7 months ago
there ISNT a largest number. Is this some sort of minor troll?
Alfourthousand 7 months ago
i think the highest number is how many times im gonna watch this vid
rubikskidcube 8 months ago
@lordswit6666 the problem goes deeper than not having enough names. In fact we do have enough names... one can simply read out the digits of any whole number. The problem is there are only a finite number of such names we can say/write and an infinite number we can not. But this also goes for decimal notation, power towers, up arrows, chain arrows, array notation etc. In otherwords, not only do we not have enough words, we don't even have enough mathematics to define all numbers...
yuyunalesca4 8 months ago in playlist Large Numbers
wow i dont really like math and im not planning to like it in anyway.. but i have to learn.. the thing is.. we can always add another number.. the only limitation i know about number is that we can be short of the names.. but we cant be short of numbers.. we can use all the names to call a new amount.. but still we can also add 999 and we have another problem to name it
lordswit6666 8 months ago
Get a life.
aloa5824 8 months ago
Even a googolplex, famed very small large number, is much greater. This is easy to prove. e^pi < 24 and e < pi < 10 . 794,843,294,078,147,843,293.7(3) < 10^21. Therefore the number is less than (10^21)*(10^(10^24) < 10^(10^25) < 10^(10^100). Therefore its less than a googolplex. Using logs its easy to show that the number has about 138,732,019,350 digits. This means its actually less than 10^(10^12) :)
yuyunalesca4 8 months ago in playlist Large Numbers
@yuyunalesca4 Thanks for clearing this up for me mate!
19792403 6 months ago
I'm afraid that your calculations are incorrect, Grahams number is soo much bigger than your number, due to your number having a recurring endpoint it is no bigger than 10 divided by 3 for instance. the largest whole number is still Grahams number. your number is as close to Grahams number as the number 1 is to infinity.
Sorry.
devilgas1 8 months ago
Nine hundred ninty-nine dectillion, nine hundred ninty-nine nontillion, nine hundred ninety-nine octillion, nine hundred ninety-nine heptillion, nine hundred ninety-nine hextillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quintillion, nine hundred ninety-nine quadrillion, nine hundred ninety-nine trillion, nine hundred ninety-nine billion, nine hundred ninety-nine million, nine hundred ninety-nine thousand, nine hundred ninety-nine. That's a way bigger number then on the video and you can still add 1 forever.
avantozane100 8 months ago
Graham's number is bigger?
lvlarky 9 months ago
nice transformer toy
masterchieftre 10 months ago
More interesting... Is a number that is right at the threshold of comprehensible, and not comprehensible. One that you can toy around with, as though you were so damn close to harnessing its magnitude.
For example. 10 to the 10 to the 10. At first, it seems like 10,000,000,000 raised to the 10. But no, it's 10 raised to 10,000,000,000 zeros.
You can visualize this. By understanding how many different paths a signal can travel in your brain of several billion neurons. Try (10^10^10^10).
pNeeko 1 year ago
there is no ultimate number, cuz u can always add 1 to it
clikityclankz 1 year ago
What bout' an 8 instead of 7, like so: ->8<-94,843,294,078,147,843,293.73333... X e to the power of TT to the power of e to the power of TT? Or what bout' googol? Or what bout' googolplex, or graham's number?
RevolverRicoche 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
makes you think
necros234necros345 1 year ago
What about a googleplex? lol
Or graham's number?
OSUfirebird18 1 year ago
Largest number i know is ''Optillion'' 5 numbers followed by 27 0's
I leart it on a documentry x3
GOOGLE DOESNT EVEN KNOW THAT NUMBER!
ThinkLikeCat 1 year ago
ummmmm. for an equation in 7th grade, i got a higher number. i documented it. it was 945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,639,914,711,753,001,834,196,567,945,662,682,846,734.6 (946 Heptillion) i was like 'what the fuck?' the number repeats itself! i cant remember the formula! :( so long
jakesmithproductions 1 year ago
twenny
yuppy64 3 years ago 7
That guy actually did give me "twenny" as his number, then looked at me as if I shouldn't challenge him on that.
MeerkatsAnonymous 3 years ago 6
wow! now i know! There i was thinking i could use addition to make numbers bigger...
hailjobee 3 years ago
This is the greatest video on the planet earth!!!!!
RinnynToad 3 years ago 3
This is freaking awesome!!
kevdogxx 3 years ago
Loved this!! absolutely hilarious!!
jimbroxxx 3 years ago