The first ever building to fall from the very top floors, being pushed down by an invisible force, as if the bottom ~90 floors or so of massive amounts of steel and concrete couldn't hold up the top 20 floors.
North Tower defied physics that day. The entire thing must have been entangled with an identical North Tower in another universe that has fucked up laws of physics.
Either that, or lets just keep believing the official story.
@rainstormseattle laws of physics still the same, the entry of the plane caused serious damage to the steel core and columns, anyone that says concrete was used in the core during construction is a liar), NIST never claim steel melted that day, at 1100 degrees steel loses 50% of its strength, and with the fire at different temperature throughout the flloors, the truss' bowed, buckled, add 10-25 floors of weight, it could not support its load
Over 1600 Architects and Engineers from "AE911Truth" have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. They are backed by US senators and former presidential candidate Mike Gravel as well as the former director of Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, amongs others.
Its about time people realise this and start listening to them.
I hrd that fbi is under investigation in Buffalo/Lackawanna (6 alqaida), NY area & presumed to be arrested is 50 agents...thus it looks like DC Wash was a screw in the meantime & unwilling to ask people questions IF/wen they don't seem to know things.. csk & to mine, I bid shuto/chop/chop
@RandomDominoGuy no it didn't the building is made out of molten steel the plane produced 600 degrees and molten can only melt over 1000 degrees. You can see the bombs going off anyway and i would say there were more bombs at the very bottom of the building.
@911NeverForget The fire from the impact explosion and burning jet fuel caused the framework to weaken/melt, and THAT'S why the South Tower collapsed first, it had more pressure on the weakened framework because its impact zone was lower than the North Tower's impact zone.
I think OBL was not so much the enemies of USA people as much he was the enemy of USA gov who are running and controlling USA but they don’t have any interest with USA their love is just for the security of Israel even for Israel if USA need to destroy. OBL statement even after 9/11 u listen he many times encourage invite USA people to don’t support isreal . How their gov making them fool. The benefit of 9/11 is that it open the eyes of many American .why destroy USA for isreal god bless usa
Oh geez everything is a conspiracy to everyone anymore...9/11, Elvis, JFK, Harp, Bin Laden being dead, NWO, Landing on the moon, The Holocaust, Pearl Harbor, ...basically anything is a "conspiracy", and everyone is an "expert" on the internet. Just my small opinion:)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@911NeverForget so you think theres noone controlling the president or other stuff thats goin on in the world and that we all just live freely? we get monitord by cameras on each street corner because we should do what the "system" tells us to do. fuck bush fuck the illuminati they had everything to do whit this
yet more paranoia, it's like this is all you guys have. there's no illuminati, we're not getting monitored by cameras on each street corner, and id say if anything's stopping Obama from accomplishing anything, regardless of whether you agree with that accomplishment or not, it's the complete division of control in Congress.
@911NeverForget there is an Illuminati just look it up and if u look at the back of the dollar bill that pyramid is there symbol but they don't do all sorts of shit like this wtf cameras wow
@howareu666 I think I have to agree with the commie LOL. My uncle has owned his own excavation and demolition company for the last 39 years and even he said that looked a hell of a lot like a controled implosion to me.
@howareu666 It is perfect idea when you have crooked president with family in the oil business who is looking for any reason to invade the middle east to steal their oil. Your as stupid as Mr0manager and brycecube94 but what can one expect from gullible westerners. Remember when there's trillions of dollars to be made , those 3000 people are expendable.
Look at the way towers fell , that looks like perfect implosion to me. Buildings don't fall straight down like this unless some demolition expert know how to place explosive charge at key stress points in structure. I and many other people in this part of the world have our suspicion about your so called terrorist attack. I think biggest terrorist in the world is George Bush and today he remain free.
@TheMegaRonnie21 On neither side , your country needs complete makeover. First step is to sign into free market along with country like China , Japan Taiwan India ect..... and get rid of capitalism and dismantle Wall St. It's Wall St. tycoons along with banking cartel thats destroying USA.
@SRostislav Your such a geinus. Great ideas. you should tell obama so he can get on that quickly. nothing is that easy when its dealing with such important things.
Your such a genius , great idea , go tell Obama. he was being as you Americans put it , a wise ass. As far as my Paxil comment goes. Years ago here the CCCP used fear to control our polulation. There were harsh laws , machine guns and barbed wire. we were told what to wear , where to go and how to get over there. There was КГБ on every corner watching you , phones were all tapped. We here believe USA controls population by keeping everyone dumbed down on pills , fast food and poor education.
The problem is there was never before an attack like these... how could we know if it would collapse or not? But, that doesn't matter because it should be PRETTY CLEAR to rational humans that these towers did not collapse... they exploded! Pull out the wrong jenga piece and it topples over and the pieces are intact. Get me? Or it is just a coincidence that jet fuel doesnt melt the plane when it burns???
@thezimboman ALso,How does the inner core beams fall with the pancaking of the floors.SHouldnt those inner beams still stand? I mean ,think about it,they only melted at the top so how did the rest of the beams melt all the way down to the street??
Neverforget is right, you shouldn't just watch a twoofer video and assume it is fact. There are pictures and video of molten metal, but there were no fires hot enough to melt steel. There are more types of metal than steel in a 110 story building, especially one with an 767 inside it.
typical. instead of offering a good response all you can say is "thats bullshit". go on and keep hearing what you want to hear. you dont care about the facts nor will you ever. NO ONE said the steel melted and NO VIDEO shows anything melting other than what may be molten aluminum from the planes leaking from the impact hole in the South Tower. thats as close to anything you keep preaching about and i doubt it has anything to do with it.
The conspiracy is not the act of 9/11 it is the act of not preventing it. The attack is 'blowback' a term used to describe a reaction from an event that you have caused. In this case the CIA knew that an attack was going to happen however if this attack was to play out there would be miliatry opportunities available. The attacks are real but the scary part is, people knew they were going to happen.
And my favorite 9/11 conspiracy argument is that the second the first tower got hit some people in the U.S. government were already saying it was Osama. How could they have possible known? Were they in on it? No, the Son of bitch tried the same thing 8 years earlier
So the buildings fell due to extreme heat from the jet fuel fire? Wouldn't they have melted then? Instead of imploding? Look at this skyscraper in Beijing on fire, it didn't even collapse and it burned for 6 hours straight. 6hSPFL2Zlpg
no, they dont need to melt. just weakened. the skyscraper in Beijing was not hit with a 500 MPH boeing 767 and has an entirely different design from the towers. you're comparing apples and oranges.
@911NeverForget The point of the report is to explain why the structures collapsed in the manner they did. The one reason given for the collapse was fire. And that fire, as you stated, caused every steel column in the building to weaken simultaneously and then have the the buildings collapse one after the other. Not buying it.
"caused every steel column in the building to weaken simultaneously and then have the the buildings collapse one after the other." what? its a whole lot more than that.
"Not buying it." and you never will. no matter what evidence is given to you, you wont be convincd.
@911NeverForget The WTC towers were designed to withstand impact from planes! And like i said before, the jet fuel went down 70 stories and spread itself too thin to warp anything! There were pools of molten steel found at ground zero! Jet fuel cant melt iron! K?
a 707. at landing speed. and low fuel. thats nothing compared to a boeing 767 flying with a full load a fuel at 500 MPH.
oh, and they DID withstand the impacts. they stood for an hour for one and an hour and a half for another. have you forgotten about that?
you don't get it. jet fuel helped ignite the fires, but durh was talking about how jet fuel BURNS that way. the warping took place around the impact zones.
no, make up your mind. is it molten iron that was found or molten steel?
One thing that is often overlooked is that the steal columns left had to not only bare the extra weight of the building, but had also the weight of a 1000 odd people. It is relevant. When the wtc was designed nobody back then anticipated that americans would get such fat piggy wiggies. Most of them are obese and all that extra fat added more weight on each column. Could it have been just enough to fatally overbear the columns causing the collapse? we shall never know.
why does everyone from other countries automatically assume that every American is fat and obese? im not fat. i know of no one that is see every day thats fat. not everyone in the country is fat.
@therockmood You piece of shit fucking coward! 3000 people died and your making fat jokes about them? FUCK YOU! You should be castrated so you dont make more faggot ass little bitches like you!
9/11 was an inside job, im sorry for all of you too blinded by hate to see this. You can still keep your hate, you just have to redirect it to the right place (your american gov). Its a shame it had to kill so many of you to get you riled up and ready to steal oil and resources from other countries.
"and ready to steal oil and resources from other countries." we didnt "steal" anything. we havent gotten any oil from you guys. if that was such a priority for us, why is it never brought up by anyone? nothing suggests that we "stole" anything.
You are right. It was an inside job. I pray in the name of Christ Jesus that the truth will be revealed: and it will be, since God is Truth. WTC 7 is without question the smoking gun. It felt perfectly - absolutely perfectly. And no plane flew into it. The other WTC towers that were way closer to the main two did not fall even though the majority of the towers fell right on top of them. And a 757 did NOT fly into the Pentagon. We have been lied to. Pray that the truth be revealed!
@911NeverForget I don't think you've read much of anything about WTC 7 other than the made up stories from the media? The WTC 7 was a steel building. A steel building will NEVER collapse in on it's own footprint in 6-7 seconds from fire. This is insanity, it breaks the laws of physics, it's IMPOSSIBLE.
another assumption. you guys hammer the media unless they have a link that supports your fantasies. ive seen and read tons on WTC 7. if only you guys would stop assuming no one researches anything just because they have an opposing opinion.
no one said it collapsed in its own footprint. it wasnt in 6-7 seconds either.
Approx. 7 seconds, you're telling me this isn't a controlled demolition? You're telling me this steel building, this government command center, which was not hit by a plane and was hit by less debree than other building that did not collapse...just imploded perfectly straight down because of a few normal fires? It takes thousands of degrees to weaken steel. The fire in WTC7 did NOT collapse it!
not the entire collapse. this is: /watch?v=ZxxsqjiFz9A
its 18 seconds, counting the fall of the penthouse.
it was hit by debris, yes.
"hit by less debree than other building that did not collapse" comparing apples and oranges. the other buildings were smaller and had different designs. WTC 7 suffered a lot of damage from debris.
again, it didnt fall straight down. there werent a few either.
and no, it doesnt take thousands of degrees to weaken steel.
@911NeverForget You're a flat out LIAR! YES it takes 2000-3000 degrees of heat to start weaking steel enough to cause failure! You ever seen steel smelted? LOOK at pictures and videos of WTC7. MOST of the building was NOT damaged . It was a LOT faster than 18 seconds wtf are you talking about? Every video shows it collapse in approx 7 seconds, 8 or 9 is PUSHING IT. YES is fell straight down. Why are you being disingenuous?
now it has melted? which one is it? did it weaken or melt?
and ive seen pictures and videos...have you read WITNESS ACCOUNTS too? firemen talk of a portion of the southeast corner of the building being gone.
again, counting the fall of the penthouse it was 18 seconds. what part of this dont you understand? i even linked to a video that shows that penthouse fall.
"YES is fell straight down." nope.
"Why are you being disingenuous?" better yet, why are you being such an ass?
@911NeverForget If a corner of the building being destroyed accounted for the collapse, why did it implode downward so quickly and so uniformly? Watch the videos of it collapsing. It was demolished. Larry Silverstein said they 'pulled it'. There is no mis interpretation of that statement it's a demolition term that means to bring the building down. It doesn't mean evacuate the building, because the building was already empty by 3pm and the building was brought down around 5.
what part of "penthouse collapse" do you not understand? stop repeating yourself like a broken record and quit ignoring what im saying.
now you're changing the subject. typical.
and no its not. never been proven to be such.
"because the building was already empty by 3pm and the building was brought down around 5." it was NEVER said when the "pull it" order was made, dude. more assumptions.
@911NeverForget thank you, the controlled demolition theory is horse crap. A lot of people just don't understand how a building like the wtc with a skeletel frame works. I do think that mossad knew about 9/11 and didn't tell us because it was in their interest to get the U.S. riled up about the "war on terror". And I do think the U.S. is largely covering that up.
@durhamdf Why did these buildings follow the path of MOST resistence and still fall at free fall speed? Why wasnt huge chunks of concrete found? why are the buildings falling down symmetrically? Why did FEMA say they needed further investigation and then destroy the material they needed to investigate? Why were there large areas of molten metal at the bottom of the debris field? Why wasnt there a single floor of metal flooring uncovered if they pancaked? Why did building seven fall at all!?
@CharlieH4ll A, who says that it fell at free fall speed? To caluculate this you would have to know exactly where the roof is when it is falling and when the last piece hits the ground which you can't because of the smoke cloud. Secondly, if you undestand the construction of this building you would get that it is basically a big egg crate with slabs of concrete being suspended inside to make up the floors. Once one goes, it takes out every floor below it. Thirdly, the steel didn't "melt"(contd)
@durhamdf Its been calculated, sir! You can see all the way down to the last 1 1/2 seconds. A freshman in high school can figure that one out! You obviously dont know how the building was made! The main columns were in the middle of the building! The floors were connected from the main interior columns to the outer grid like columns! if the floors were to "pancake" there should have been a huge square of columns still standing on the inside! Furthermore, why were there not stacks of floors seen?
@CharlieH4ll (contd)... jet fuel burns hot enough however to warp and bend steel and make it lose structural integrity. There WERE large chunks of concrete at the bottom of the rubble pile, but the tops layers turned to dust. Why you ask? Because if you drop a chunk od concrete 1000 feet it turns to dust on impact! And WTC 7 fell because one of the largest buildings in the world fell on it and it caught fire...
@durhamdf The jet fuel was said to travel down stories down the elevator shaft! So, which is it? Did the jet fuel destroy the lobby downstairs? If it was the jet fuel then it would have spread itself too thin to warp anything! If it wasnt then obviously an explosive destroyed the lobby prior to collapse! The steel did melt, sir! Are you calling the New York Firefighters who put their lives at risk for others liars? Look up "U.S. Government lies about molten steel found at Ground Zero after 9/11"
@durhamdf Ever heard of Nanothermite? Firefighters and construction workers have seen pools of molten iron seven weeks after the towers fell! Jet fuel cant melt iron! These arent theories. They are the facts. You can find countless videos of evedence. But you dont want to look, do you?
nanothermite is one of the dumbest of the theories. it has nothing to do with controlled demolitions and isn't used that way. it doesnt help an inside job by any means and is irrelevent. there's no evidence that iron was the molten metal. what there IS evidence of, however, is molten aluminum, which likely came from things such as plane parts.
no, what you're spewing is not even close to facts and none of those videos are "evidence".
@CharlieH4ll HAHA show me a photo or news report from a reputable source that backs up your pooled melted Steel theory. Occam's razor...you are right it wasn't pissed off terrorist highjacking a plane and crashing it into buildings it was ninjas planting thermite all over the building in the cover of night controlled by the zionist NWO shadow government conspiracy hahahahhaha
@911NeverForget No fire has ever collapsed a steel framed building, EVER! But i guess the laws of physics took a break that day, cause three buildings took the path of MOST resistance that day!! Issac Newton would be shocked!
how many more times are you going to change the subject?
hasnt happened before =/= cant happen.
you guys just obsess over the laws of physics as if your claims are that valid when A) they're not valid at all and B) the laws of physics are something that you guys dont seem to, or care to, understand.
@lisatostado You see.. there are three people in the US.
Those blinded by their loyalty to the country and waving the flag, hating anyone who is from any country practicing the terrorists religion, and even some that don't practice the religion.
then there are those conspiracy theorists who are to bored and have too much time on their hands.
Then those who realize that nearly, or more than, 3000 people died in this, and 9./11 will always be remembered. Fuck off with your theories.
@wheredarknessislight The government story is a theory, the 9/11 'commission' was stonewalled by the government, 9 out of 10 of the commissioners came out and said the investigation was hardly that.
HEY THANKS FOR POINTING OUT WHAT THOSE "DUST EJECTIONS" WERE .YEAH WHY ELSE WOULD THEY GO OFF AT THE SAME TIME ...RIGHT ??? PLEASE TGHEY ARE FUCKIN EXPLOSIONS YOU STUPID FUCK THQAT WOULDNT KNOW EXPLOSIVES IF ONE WENT OFF ON HIS DUMB HEAD STUPID MOTHER FUCKER!!!
whats so freaking hard to understand. You have a PLANE (makes it SLIGHTLY different than traditional tower fires) blow entire chunks of a buildings core structure out (plenty of pics of sections o the tower laying in the plaza and streets).... you have 30-40 stories above the impact zone putting stress on the weakened outer core. the true strangeness is that it didn't collapse sooner but nobody on the scene wanted to believe it could happen
*Sigh* controlled demolition. I wish people would stop calling it a conspiracy theory and begin to embrace this as fact, people died for corruption and oil. Oil can't justify this. Nothing can justify the deaths of nearly 3000 innocents.
@911NeverForget My friend, to deny the incontravertible evidence is to give in to willful ignorance. When I discovered what really happened, I refused to believe it, did my own research, and when I stumbled on the facts, I still refused to believe it. Now, after triple checking thousands of pages of evidence, hundreds of pictures and videos, and dozens of audio and transcripts, I am forced to accept that this terrible proclamation is indeed true. I tried to refute it, and I failed. It is true :(
@911NeverForget I have read the 9/11 commission report and discovered far too many flaws too pass unnoticed. I don't know who you've been hearing from, but the evidence that I have obtained is undeniable. Though there are many gaps in my knowledge of the specifics, I can tell you with reasonable certainty that either the US government was responsible for the attacks, or it was extremely negligent and unorganized. To assume the latter would be to accept the highly circumstantial official story.
@911NeverForget I can name one off the top of my head. According the the Commission Report, WTC 7 fell in 18 seconds, when in fact it fell in less than 7 seconds. It also claimed that the intense heat from the jet fuel fires in the Twin Towers caused the steel to melt, when in fact steel melts at 2777 degrees F while jet fuel burns at 1120 degrees F. There are bland errors like these scattered throughout the entire report.
@911NeverForget It didn't split, what are you talking about? You can watch any video of its collapse, you can see it standing perfectly still one second and collapsing the next. Also, the report detailed the circumstances under which it collapsed; these details are preposterous to say the least. It claims that structural damage and fires brought the building down, whereas buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6 were damaged worse and did not collapse. WTC7 contained many IA governmental investigations.
@911NeverForget And yes, the report said that the steel was weakened to the point of melting, which is impossible given the difference of tempurature. Also, for the buildings to have collapsed vertically, the 288 steel support columns had to have all given way at the exact same time on several different floors. this can only be achieved through the use of explosives; these explosives can be seen exploding in most closeup videos of the towers' collapse.
to the point of melting =/= it melted. it just means it was NEAR that point. no one said the steel actually melted. it weakened and sagged.
what? did you even see the plane hole, clearly showing how many floors got hurt by the impact? the entire upper portion of the North Tower was on fire in the minute prior before it's collapse too.
and no they cant be seen. those arent explosions. it is jets of dust caused by the enormous pressure that the enormous energy of the collapse created.
@911NeverForget It wasn't near that point though, it was more than 500 degrees away. And if those were just jets of dust, they would have flown out of every window on the floors where they supposedly flew out. And in any case, the towers were designed to withstand anything, including multiple impacts by aircraft. Not to mention the fact that they fell vertically, meaning that all 287 support columns must have given way at the same time for every few floors at a time. It's too circumstantial.
not all the floors had that capability. only the Sky Lobby floors had the capability.
the towers didnt collapse when the planes hit. have you even seen any footage? they fell 59 and 102 minutes later respectively. who said the planes alone caused the collapses?
and how could all of them have given way easily when the upper portion buckled inward BEFORE falling vertically and when it was only the impact zone and above that were even damaged?
@911NeverForget I never said that the buildings fell on impact. And you're wrong about the sky lobby, every part of the building was built to withstand that type of attack, you made the part about the sky lobby up. And the upper portion buckeled vertically, it began to fall as soon as the bombs were detonated. The only way that a building can fall vertically is if all support beams are knocked out at the same time, gravity will bring it down. The only way that could have been done is with bombs.
@911NeverForget Now why would the jets of dust only be able to come from the Sky Lobby when video footage clearly shows them coming from WTC up to 80 floors beneath the demolition wave? And I did answer your question, buildings do not collapse vertically unless all support columns are destroyed at the same time. Buckling is an effect of the building collapsing, not a cause. The cause of the buildings buckling was bombs, traces of the bombs were found in the wreckage. I need to go, I'll be back
Look at 0:21, it looks like a cute dog!
RtZ10 1 week ago
More and more people don't believe the lie and people are doing something about it
shotdown1010 2 weeks ago
The first ever building to fall from the very top floors, being pushed down by an invisible force, as if the bottom ~90 floors or so of massive amounts of steel and concrete couldn't hold up the top 20 floors.
North Tower defied physics that day. The entire thing must have been entangled with an identical North Tower in another universe that has fucked up laws of physics.
Either that, or lets just keep believing the official story.
rainstormseattle 1 month ago
@rainstormseattle laws of physics still the same, the entry of the plane caused serious damage to the steel core and columns, anyone that says concrete was used in the core during construction is a liar), NIST never claim steel melted that day, at 1100 degrees steel loses 50% of its strength, and with the fire at different temperature throughout the flloors, the truss' bowed, buckled, add 10-25 floors of weight, it could not support its load
DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK
cottoniiijoe 1 month ago
haha so many sheep are on these comments...You people will gobble up anything the government will tell you wont you?
Dillon1108 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Over 1600 Architects and Engineers from "AE911Truth" have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. They are backed by US senators and former presidential candidate Mike Gravel as well as the former director of Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, amongs others.
Its about time people realise this and start listening to them.
Here is their campaign ad.
watch?v=3XXEMwhizCE
The911watch 3 months ago
I hrd that fbi is under investigation in Buffalo/Lackawanna (6 alqaida), NY area & presumed to be arrested is 50 agents...thus it looks like DC Wash was a screw in the meantime & unwilling to ask people questions IF/wen they don't seem to know things.. csk & to mine, I bid shuto/chop/chop
JoseCleveland 4 months ago
from where the blasting material taken???? as u can see in video
zeeemunda 4 months ago
@Pain9889 Not made out of molten steel, and how would YOU know the degrees of the flames?
RandomDominoGuy 4 months ago
@RandomDominoGuy no it didn't the building is made out of molten steel the plane produced 600 degrees and molten can only melt over 1000 degrees. You can see the bombs going off anyway and i would say there were more bombs at the very bottom of the building.
Pain9889 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: THE WEAPON THAT CAN BREAK THE CYCLE OF WAR AND TERRORISM, Debated Issues, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
balanceddiet.yolasite.com
balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
SPREAD THIS BOOK AND CONQUER THE SPREADING EVIL BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - FOR FREEDOM AND PEACE.
TheServiceWeb 4 months ago
Controlled demolition.
Dumb peoples..
545416855987988666 4 months ago
@911NeverForget The fire from the impact explosion and burning jet fuel caused the framework to weaken/melt, and THAT'S why the South Tower collapsed first, it had more pressure on the weakened framework because its impact zone was lower than the North Tower's impact zone.
RandomDominoGuy 4 months ago
@RandomDominoGuy There's no point in explaining things to these people, they'll just repeat what they've been told so they can get attention.
LeeAnnOfAlderaan 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think OBL was not so much the enemies of USA people as much he was the enemy of USA gov who are running and controlling USA but they don’t have any interest with USA their love is just for the security of Israel even for Israel if USA need to destroy. OBL statement even after 9/11 u listen he many times encourage invite USA people to don’t support isreal . How their gov making them fool. The benefit of 9/11 is that it open the eyes of many American .why destroy USA for isreal god bless usa
dpremi1126 4 months ago
why hasn't anonymous exposed the illuminati yet
saike1984 4 months ago
thank god bin laden is in hell this is very and buy the bin laden BURN IN HELL BITCH!!!!!!!
asspooper65 5 months ago
@asspooper65 dude, -_-
bigdragon8me 4 months ago
Oh geez everything is a conspiracy to everyone anymore...9/11, Elvis, JFK, Harp, Bin Laden being dead, NWO, Landing on the moon, The Holocaust, Pearl Harbor, ...basically anything is a "conspiracy", and everyone is an "expert" on the internet. Just my small opinion:)
NowThePeople 5 months ago
lebron traveled
AyyMcIntosh 5 months ago
pause at 0:21 teddy bear
homomonkey9090 5 months ago
15 seconds looks like a first coming out , illuminati trying to take control
leather10 7 months ago
only you guys would find some crazy, paranoid way to turn smoke into some illuminati plot even though i highly doubt there's even a group like that.
911NeverForget 7 months ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@911NeverForget so you think theres noone controlling the president or other stuff thats goin on in the world and that we all just live freely? we get monitord by cameras on each street corner because we should do what the "system" tells us to do. fuck bush fuck the illuminati they had everything to do whit this
mitchisftw 6 months ago
yet more paranoia, it's like this is all you guys have. there's no illuminati, we're not getting monitored by cameras on each street corner, and id say if anything's stopping Obama from accomplishing anything, regardless of whether you agree with that accomplishment or not, it's the complete division of control in Congress.
although Bush was horrible. THAT i agree with.
911NeverForget 6 months ago 3
@911NeverForget If anyone thinks that Bush was smart enough to pull off the greatest cover up in the history of the World..... I don't think so
12supra99 4 months ago
@911NeverForget there is an Illuminati just look it up and if u look at the back of the dollar bill that pyramid is there symbol but they don't do all sorts of shit like this wtf cameras wow
Ronyhaloman 4 months ago
@911NeverForget Actually...We are...Security cameras on every street corner....and the illuminati is real...It was made in 1st may 1776....
lukealandrummond 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 7 in advance?
ctcole77 2 months ago
@mitchisftw again absoloute retard
joemoin 4 months ago
@mitchisftw dude if you're so fucking obsessed with these conspiracies then why do you live in the u.s.
codyjt5150 4 months ago
@codyjt5150 i live in belgium . lol but its happening all over the world you're just to blind to see it
mitchisftw 4 months ago
@911NeverForget Actually there is a such thing, but it is over a century old and could not have pulled off anything like this.
LolsOfRoflica 1 month ago
@leather10 and if you look closely at the smoke at 16 seconds in you can see Dakota Fanning.
THAT BITCH!!!!!
paulinotou 4 months ago 8
@leather10 absoloute retard.
joemoin 4 months ago
@leather10 you killed it
kill28illuminati 2 weeks ago
Sad* :'(
musclesaremything 7 months ago
Sas
musclesaremything 7 months ago
@Mr0manager dont waste your time. people believe what they want... weak who cant rely on logic
Thrallsbuddy 8 months ago
@howareu666 I didn't run out of facts , just not wasting the brain power on a primate. This is more fun anyway.
Taz0161 8 months ago
@howareu666 Your existance on my planet is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard , so I guess that makes us even :) " GOD" another fundie
Taz0161 8 months ago
@howareu666 I think I have to agree with the commie LOL. My uncle has owned his own excavation and demolition company for the last 39 years and even he said that looked a hell of a lot like a controled implosion to me.
Taz0161 8 months ago
LOOKING LIKE a demolition doesnt mean it IS a demolition.
911NeverForget 8 months ago
@911NeverForget Ya reckon so ?
Taz0161 8 months ago
indeed i do.
911NeverForget 8 months ago
@911NeverForget
If it smells like a duck.
OrganizeLegalize 8 months ago
@howareu666 It is perfect idea when you have crooked president with family in the oil business who is looking for any reason to invade the middle east to steal their oil. Your as stupid as Mr0manager and brycecube94 but what can one expect from gullible westerners. Remember when there's trillions of dollars to be made , those 3000 people are expendable.
SRostislav 8 months ago
@Mr0manager And you believe this ???? I have peach orchard for sale in Siberia , you interested ?
SRostislav 9 months ago
Look at the way towers fell , that looks like perfect implosion to me. Buildings don't fall straight down like this unless some demolition expert know how to place explosive charge at key stress points in structure. I and many other people in this part of the world have our suspicion about your so called terrorist attack. I think biggest terrorist in the world is George Bush and today he remain free.
SRostislav 9 months ago
@SRostislav So what side are you on. I dislike Bush and i dislike osama even more.
TheMegaRonnie21 9 months ago
@TheMegaRonnie21 On neither side , your country needs complete makeover. First step is to sign into free market along with country like China , Japan Taiwan India ect..... and get rid of capitalism and dismantle Wall St. It's Wall St. tycoons along with banking cartel thats destroying USA.
SRostislav 9 months ago
@SRostislav Your such a geinus. Great ideas. you should tell obama so he can get on that quickly. nothing is that easy when its dealing with such important things.
brycecube94 9 months ago
@brycecube94 Yes Iam genius LOLOL It doesn't take genius to figure out whats wrong there. Go have another Big Mac and take your Paxil.
SRostislav 8 months ago
totally uncalled for. he wasn't insulting you at all and then you go and say that.
911NeverForget 8 months ago
Your such a genius , great idea , go tell Obama. he was being as you Americans put it , a wise ass. As far as my Paxil comment goes. Years ago here the CCCP used fear to control our polulation. There were harsh laws , machine guns and barbed wire. we were told what to wear , where to go and how to get over there. There was КГБ on every corner watching you , phones were all tapped. We here believe USA controls population by keeping everyone dumbed down on pills , fast food and poor education.
SRostislav 8 months ago
now you're just being an asshole.
911NeverForget 8 months ago
@911NeverForget No I'm being a realist but since east and west will never agree on anything maybe is best to end this now.
SRostislav 8 months ago
Reminds me of the movie Independence Day
SmoothCriminalAaron 10 months ago
the buildings weren't properly fireproofed. thats why they fell from the fires. it was proven.
mememeandjustmeme 11 months ago
Mr HaHa Man needs to dig his hole in the dirt deeper.
Part of his head is still sticking out.
twelvselvs 1 year ago
The problem is there was never before an attack like these... how could we know if it would collapse or not? But, that doesn't matter because it should be PRETTY CLEAR to rational humans that these towers did not collapse... they exploded! Pull out the wrong jenga piece and it topples over and the pieces are intact. Get me? Or it is just a coincidence that jet fuel doesnt melt the plane when it burns???
thezimboman 1 year ago
because they actually did research and found it that it was inevitable.
they didnt explode.
you should know exactly why. that's evidence of the collapse that's explained by multiple agencies, not of a CD.
no one said anything melted.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@thezimboman: If your parents had to pay anything toward your education? ...I suggest they try and get a refund.
digglyda 11 months ago
@digglyda There's no need for insults diggster.
thezimboman 11 months ago
@thezimboman ALso,How does the inner core beams fall with the pancaking of the floors.SHouldnt those inner beams still stand? I mean ,think about it,they only melted at the top so how did the rest of the beams melt all the way down to the street??
fadethetrade 11 months ago
no one said any of the steel melted.
911NeverForget 11 months ago
@911NeverForget the steel melted !!
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
no it didnt and no one said it did.
911NeverForget 10 months ago
@911NeverForget are you living behind the moon ?? watch vids dude ... it melted..
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
"watch vids". seriously? thats all you have?
it didnt melt. no one said it melted. period.
911NeverForget 10 months ago
@911NeverForget i believe what i see you didn't? it melted!!!!!
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
no it didnt.
911NeverForget 10 months ago
@911NeverForget believe it or not but it melted!!!
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
believe it or not...but it didnt.
911NeverForget 10 months ago
@911NeverForget it did !
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
nope.
911NeverForget 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@911NeverForget sure! why you won`t believe? tell me
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
@Rettungsliegerfan
Neverforget is right, you shouldn't just watch a twoofer video and assume it is fact. There are pictures and video of molten metal, but there were no fires hot enough to melt steel. There are more types of metal than steel in a 110 story building, especially one with an 767 inside it.
Blacktoe 10 months ago
thats epischial bullschit
Rettungsliegerfan 10 months ago
typical. instead of offering a good response all you can say is "thats bullshit". go on and keep hearing what you want to hear. you dont care about the facts nor will you ever. NO ONE said the steel melted and NO VIDEO shows anything melting other than what may be molten aluminum from the planes leaking from the impact hole in the South Tower. thats as close to anything you keep preaching about and i doubt it has anything to do with it.
im wasting my time with you.
BLOCKED
911NeverForget 10 months ago
goodluck with the new tower it isnt gonna collapse
johnkimble2007 1 year ago
all buildings have some sort of weakness.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
it was more than that and you know it.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JFK on 911: watch?v=DxnpujfanUM&feature=related
iamr8 1 year ago
The conspiracy is not the act of 9/11 it is the act of not preventing it. The attack is 'blowback' a term used to describe a reaction from an event that you have caused. In this case the CIA knew that an attack was going to happen however if this attack was to play out there would be miliatry opportunities available. The attacks are real but the scary part is, people knew they were going to happen.
freshcolloquy 1 year ago
they didnt know that the events of 9/11 were going to happen. they knew a terrorist attack was coming but not what it was.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget They knew an attack was coming cause they helped it transpire!
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
no they didnt.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
And my favorite 9/11 conspiracy argument is that the second the first tower got hit some people in the U.S. government were already saying it was Osama. How could they have possible known? Were they in on it? No, the Son of bitch tried the same thing 8 years earlier
durhamdf 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was a demolition job.
justicepartyuk 1 year ago
So the buildings fell due to extreme heat from the jet fuel fire? Wouldn't they have melted then? Instead of imploding? Look at this skyscraper in Beijing on fire, it didn't even collapse and it burned for 6 hours straight. 6hSPFL2Zlpg
The 9/11 commission that didn't get it right.
citizenlizard 1 year ago
no, they dont need to melt. just weakened. the skyscraper in Beijing was not hit with a 500 MPH boeing 767 and has an entirely different design from the towers. you're comparing apples and oranges.
911NeverForget 1 year ago 6
@911NeverForget The point of the report is to explain why the structures collapsed in the manner they did. The one reason given for the collapse was fire. And that fire, as you stated, caused every steel column in the building to weaken simultaneously and then have the the buildings collapse one after the other. Not buying it.
citizenlizard 1 year ago
"caused every steel column in the building to weaken simultaneously and then have the the buildings collapse one after the other." what? its a whole lot more than that.
"Not buying it." and you never will. no matter what evidence is given to you, you wont be convincd.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget The WTC towers were designed to withstand impact from planes! And like i said before, the jet fuel went down 70 stories and spread itself too thin to warp anything! There were pools of molten steel found at ground zero! Jet fuel cant melt iron! K?
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
a 707. at landing speed. and low fuel. thats nothing compared to a boeing 767 flying with a full load a fuel at 500 MPH.
oh, and they DID withstand the impacts. they stood for an hour for one and an hour and a half for another. have you forgotten about that?
you don't get it. jet fuel helped ignite the fires, but durh was talking about how jet fuel BURNS that way. the warping took place around the impact zones.
no, make up your mind. is it molten iron that was found or molten steel?
911NeverForget 1 year ago
If you look carefully you can see little flashes of light from inside the smoke as it collapses - like several small explosions.............
alphaecho100 1 year ago
no...no light...the only light is the fireball seen when the collapse began.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@alphaecho100 I only saw one...
Sonikclaw2 1 year ago
Fuckin terrorists!!!
The1979Warriors 1 year ago
One thing that is often overlooked is that the steal columns left had to not only bare the extra weight of the building, but had also the weight of a 1000 odd people. It is relevant. When the wtc was designed nobody back then anticipated that americans would get such fat piggy wiggies. Most of them are obese and all that extra fat added more weight on each column. Could it have been just enough to fatally overbear the columns causing the collapse? we shall never know.
therockmood 1 year ago
why does everyone from other countries automatically assume that every American is fat and obese? im not fat. i know of no one that is see every day thats fat. not everyone in the country is fat.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget Hes trying to be funny. Don't bother to deal with him.
aSASa45454 1 year ago
i guess.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@therockmood and where are you from?
bajesus666 1 year ago
@therockmood You piece of shit fucking coward! 3000 people died and your making fat jokes about them? FUCK YOU! You should be castrated so you dont make more faggot ass little bitches like you!
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job, im sorry for all of you too blinded by hate to see this. You can still keep your hate, you just have to redirect it to the right place (your american gov). Its a shame it had to kill so many of you to get you riled up and ready to steal oil and resources from other countries.
lisatostado 1 year ago
what does hate have to do with anything?
"and ready to steal oil and resources from other countries." we didnt "steal" anything. we havent gotten any oil from you guys. if that was such a priority for us, why is it never brought up by anyone? nothing suggests that we "stole" anything.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
You are right. It was an inside job. I pray in the name of Christ Jesus that the truth will be revealed: and it will be, since God is Truth. WTC 7 is without question the smoking gun. It felt perfectly - absolutely perfectly. And no plane flew into it. The other WTC towers that were way closer to the main two did not fall even though the majority of the towers fell right on top of them. And a 757 did NOT fly into the Pentagon. We have been lied to. Pray that the truth be revealed!
bjdm3089 1 year ago
you havent read much about WTC 7's collapse, have you?
their designs were different from WTC 7. thats why they reacted differently. plus, they didnt catch on fire. WTC 7 did.
a 757 did hit the Pentagon.
"We have been lied to." no we havent.
"Pray that the truth be revealed!" it has...that 9/11 was an outside job.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget I don't think you've read much of anything about WTC 7 other than the made up stories from the media? The WTC 7 was a steel building. A steel building will NEVER collapse in on it's own footprint in 6-7 seconds from fire. This is insanity, it breaks the laws of physics, it's IMPOSSIBLE.
Advenactus 1 year ago
another assumption. you guys hammer the media unless they have a link that supports your fantasies. ive seen and read tons on WTC 7. if only you guys would stop assuming no one researches anything just because they have an opposing opinion.
no one said it collapsed in its own footprint. it wasnt in 6-7 seconds either.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget
youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
Approx. 7 seconds, you're telling me this isn't a controlled demolition? You're telling me this steel building, this government command center, which was not hit by a plane and was hit by less debree than other building that did not collapse...just imploded perfectly straight down because of a few normal fires? It takes thousands of degrees to weaken steel. The fire in WTC7 did NOT collapse it!
Advenactus 1 year ago
not the entire collapse. this is: /watch?v=ZxxsqjiFz9A
its 18 seconds, counting the fall of the penthouse.
it was hit by debris, yes.
"hit by less debree than other building that did not collapse" comparing apples and oranges. the other buildings were smaller and had different designs. WTC 7 suffered a lot of damage from debris.
again, it didnt fall straight down. there werent a few either.
and no, it doesnt take thousands of degrees to weaken steel.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget You're a flat out LIAR! YES it takes 2000-3000 degrees of heat to start weaking steel enough to cause failure! You ever seen steel smelted? LOOK at pictures and videos of WTC7. MOST of the building was NOT damaged . It was a LOT faster than 18 seconds wtf are you talking about? Every video shows it collapse in approx 7 seconds, 8 or 9 is PUSHING IT. YES is fell straight down. Why are you being disingenuous?
Advenactus 1 year ago
now it has melted? which one is it? did it weaken or melt?
and ive seen pictures and videos...have you read WITNESS ACCOUNTS too? firemen talk of a portion of the southeast corner of the building being gone.
again, counting the fall of the penthouse it was 18 seconds. what part of this dont you understand? i even linked to a video that shows that penthouse fall.
"YES is fell straight down." nope.
"Why are you being disingenuous?" better yet, why are you being such an ass?
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget If a corner of the building being destroyed accounted for the collapse, why did it implode downward so quickly and so uniformly? Watch the videos of it collapsing. It was demolished. Larry Silverstein said they 'pulled it'. There is no mis interpretation of that statement it's a demolition term that means to bring the building down. It doesn't mean evacuate the building, because the building was already empty by 3pm and the building was brought down around 5.
Advenactus 1 year ago
once again. it didnt fall into itself.
what part of "penthouse collapse" do you not understand? stop repeating yourself like a broken record and quit ignoring what im saying.
now you're changing the subject. typical.
and no its not. never been proven to be such.
"because the building was already empty by 3pm and the building was brought down around 5." it was NEVER said when the "pull it" order was made, dude. more assumptions.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget thank you, the controlled demolition theory is horse crap. A lot of people just don't understand how a building like the wtc with a skeletel frame works. I do think that mossad knew about 9/11 and didn't tell us because it was in their interest to get the U.S. riled up about the "war on terror". And I do think the U.S. is largely covering that up.
durhamdf 1 year ago
agreed.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@durhamdf Why did these buildings follow the path of MOST resistence and still fall at free fall speed? Why wasnt huge chunks of concrete found? why are the buildings falling down symmetrically? Why did FEMA say they needed further investigation and then destroy the material they needed to investigate? Why were there large areas of molten metal at the bottom of the debris field? Why wasnt there a single floor of metal flooring uncovered if they pancaked? Why did building seven fall at all!?
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
@CharlieH4ll A, who says that it fell at free fall speed? To caluculate this you would have to know exactly where the roof is when it is falling and when the last piece hits the ground which you can't because of the smoke cloud. Secondly, if you undestand the construction of this building you would get that it is basically a big egg crate with slabs of concrete being suspended inside to make up the floors. Once one goes, it takes out every floor below it. Thirdly, the steel didn't "melt"(contd)
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf Its been calculated, sir! You can see all the way down to the last 1 1/2 seconds. A freshman in high school can figure that one out! You obviously dont know how the building was made! The main columns were in the middle of the building! The floors were connected from the main interior columns to the outer grid like columns! if the floors were to "pancake" there should have been a huge square of columns still standing on the inside! Furthermore, why were there not stacks of floors seen?
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
there was. portions of the cores of both towers stood for a few seconds after each collase before they, too, fell.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@CharlieH4ll (contd)... jet fuel burns hot enough however to warp and bend steel and make it lose structural integrity. There WERE large chunks of concrete at the bottom of the rubble pile, but the tops layers turned to dust. Why you ask? Because if you drop a chunk od concrete 1000 feet it turns to dust on impact! And WTC 7 fell because one of the largest buildings in the world fell on it and it caught fire...
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf The jet fuel was said to travel down stories down the elevator shaft! So, which is it? Did the jet fuel destroy the lobby downstairs? If it was the jet fuel then it would have spread itself too thin to warp anything! If it wasnt then obviously an explosive destroyed the lobby prior to collapse! The steel did melt, sir! Are you calling the New York Firefighters who put their lives at risk for others liars? Look up "U.S. Government lies about molten steel found at Ground Zero after 9/11"
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
where did he mention the lobby?
he was talking about how it was BURNING to do so.
no it didnt. you're lying. no one has ever said the steel melted except you guys.
it wasnt molten steel, the evidence supporting that is near zero.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@CharlieH4ll Ever heard of Occam's Razor? That should explain why the conspiracy theories are retarded
durhamdf 1 year ago
@durhamdf Ever heard of Nanothermite? Firefighters and construction workers have seen pools of molten iron seven weeks after the towers fell! Jet fuel cant melt iron! These arent theories. They are the facts. You can find countless videos of evedence. But you dont want to look, do you?
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
nanothermite is one of the dumbest of the theories. it has nothing to do with controlled demolitions and isn't used that way. it doesnt help an inside job by any means and is irrelevent. there's no evidence that iron was the molten metal. what there IS evidence of, however, is molten aluminum, which likely came from things such as plane parts.
no, what you're spewing is not even close to facts and none of those videos are "evidence".
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget Yes finally someone NOT stupid. this was terrorists, and planes are freaking thousands of pounds. the building WILL collapse.
firegem18 1 year ago
agreed.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@CharlieH4ll HAHA show me a photo or news report from a reputable source that backs up your pooled melted Steel theory. Occam's razor...you are right it wasn't pissed off terrorist highjacking a plane and crashing it into buildings it was ninjas planting thermite all over the building in the cover of night controlled by the zionist NWO shadow government conspiracy hahahahhaha
durhamdf 1 year ago
@911NeverForget Seaking of fireman. Uh, they said they heard countless explosions. They say theyve seen molten metal. And they say your a liar.
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
again, you change the subject. is this all thats going to happen? as soon as i address one claim, you go and ignore that by going to another claim.
explosions do not always mean bombs.
and wheres the proof they saw that?
and no they dont. they saw YOU'RE a liar. im wasting my time with you.
BLOCKED
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget No fire has ever collapsed a steel framed building, EVER! But i guess the laws of physics took a break that day, cause three buildings took the path of MOST resistance that day!! Issac Newton would be shocked!
CharlieH4ll 1 year ago
how many more times are you going to change the subject?
hasnt happened before =/= cant happen.
you guys just obsess over the laws of physics as if your claims are that valid when A) they're not valid at all and B) the laws of physics are something that you guys dont seem to, or care to, understand.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@lisatostado You see.. there are three people in the US.
Those blinded by their loyalty to the country and waving the flag, hating anyone who is from any country practicing the terrorists religion, and even some that don't practice the religion.
then there are those conspiracy theorists who are to bored and have too much time on their hands.
Then those who realize that nearly, or more than, 3000 people died in this, and 9./11 will always be remembered. Fuck off with your theories.
wheredarknessislight 1 year ago
@wheredarknessislight The government story is a theory, the 9/11 'commission' was stonewalled by the government, 9 out of 10 of the commissioners came out and said the investigation was hardly that.
Advenactus 1 year ago
@Advenactus not to be an ass, but I care? I'm saying that i don't care...
wheredarknessislight 1 year ago
@wheredarknessislight Good for you?
Advenactus 1 year ago
"The government story is a theory" no it isnt.
"the 9/11 'commission' was stonewalled by the government" no it wasnt.
"9 out of 10 of the commissioners came out and said the investigation was hardly that." no they didnt.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@911NeverForget
en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_9/11_Commission
Stop living in denial.
Advenactus 1 year ago
9/11 was definetley not an inside job, i'm sick of all the theories, it was a horrible day for the U.S.A. and the theories are crazy!
mmeeegggaaannn 1 year ago
HEY THANKS FOR POINTING OUT WHAT THOSE "DUST EJECTIONS" WERE .YEAH WHY ELSE WOULD THEY GO OFF AT THE SAME TIME ...RIGHT ??? PLEASE TGHEY ARE FUCKIN EXPLOSIONS YOU STUPID FUCK THQAT WOULDNT KNOW EXPLOSIVES IF ONE WENT OFF ON HIS DUMB HEAD STUPID MOTHER FUCKER!!!
MERCURHILLMANIAC 1 year ago
except it wasnt at the same time and explosions in CDs are set off BEFORE the building collapses.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget you see what you dont wanna see and i will see what i want
MERCURHILLMANIAC 1 year ago
in other words, you'll ignore reality and just stick to what you want to believe, no matter how wrong it is. not surprised.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@MERCURHILLMANIAC what is your reality einstien?
MERCURHILLMANIAC 1 year ago
for one thing, its not "my" reality. secondly, i believe 9/11 was an outside job.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget outside of your comprehension to relate to or cope with.
MERCURHILLMANIAC 1 year ago
and your rudeness.
you of all people need to learn to cope...with the fact that 9/11 was an outside job.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget OH FUCKIN GO AWAY ALREADY CHILD ..YOU ARE BLIND AND SHALL STAY THIS WAY TILL DEATH!!! HAVE A GOOD ONE ....BYE!
MERCURHILLMANIAC 1 year ago
oh IM to go away? you're the idiot that came here in the first place. grow up. im wasting my time with you.
BLOCKED
911NeverForget 1 year ago
whats so freaking hard to understand. You have a PLANE (makes it SLIGHTLY different than traditional tower fires) blow entire chunks of a buildings core structure out (plenty of pics of sections o the tower laying in the plaza and streets).... you have 30-40 stories above the impact zone putting stress on the weakened outer core. the true strangeness is that it didn't collapse sooner but nobody on the scene wanted to believe it could happen
refugeeca 1 year ago
if you believe the towers were rigged to blow up like in a demolition then when did a demolition crew have time to rig them big ass buildings?
flirtwd 1 year ago
Comment removed
iwillhelpyoudie 1 year ago
*Sigh* controlled demolition. I wish people would stop calling it a conspiracy theory and begin to embrace this as fact, people died for corruption and oil. Oil can't justify this. Nothing can justify the deaths of nearly 3000 innocents.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
because its not fact. it never has been.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget My friend, to deny the incontravertible evidence is to give in to willful ignorance. When I discovered what really happened, I refused to believe it, did my own research, and when I stumbled on the facts, I still refused to believe it. Now, after triple checking thousands of pages of evidence, hundreds of pictures and videos, and dozens of audio and transcripts, I am forced to accept that this terrible proclamation is indeed true. I tried to refute it, and I failed. It is true :(
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
except there is no evidence. what they call evidence has major major flaws. 9/11 is no doubt to me an outside job.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget I have read the 9/11 commission report and discovered far too many flaws too pass unnoticed. I don't know who you've been hearing from, but the evidence that I have obtained is undeniable. Though there are many gaps in my knowledge of the specifics, I can tell you with reasonable certainty that either the US government was responsible for the attacks, or it was extremely negligent and unorganized. To assume the latter would be to accept the highly circumstantial official story.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
its not an official story for one thing, and another thing the 9/11C has no flaws.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget I can name one off the top of my head. According the the Commission Report, WTC 7 fell in 18 seconds, when in fact it fell in less than 7 seconds. It also claimed that the intense heat from the jet fuel fires in the Twin Towers caused the steel to melt, when in fact steel melts at 2777 degrees F while jet fuel burns at 1120 degrees F. There are bland errors like these scattered throughout the entire report.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
no, it was 18 seconds. the collapse began when the penthouse split, not when the whole thing fell.
no, they didnt say it melt. no one did.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget It didn't split, what are you talking about? You can watch any video of its collapse, you can see it standing perfectly still one second and collapsing the next. Also, the report detailed the circumstances under which it collapsed; these details are preposterous to say the least. It claims that structural damage and fires brought the building down, whereas buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6 were damaged worse and did not collapse. WTC7 contained many IA governmental investigations.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
again, the penthouse split the building in two before it fell. it was a good 2-3 seconds before the rest of the building fell.
3, 4, 5, and 6 did not have the same designs as 7.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget And yes, the report said that the steel was weakened to the point of melting, which is impossible given the difference of tempurature. Also, for the buildings to have collapsed vertically, the 288 steel support columns had to have all given way at the exact same time on several different floors. this can only be achieved through the use of explosives; these explosives can be seen exploding in most closeup videos of the towers' collapse.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
to the point of melting =/= it melted. it just means it was NEAR that point. no one said the steel actually melted. it weakened and sagged.
what? did you even see the plane hole, clearly showing how many floors got hurt by the impact? the entire upper portion of the North Tower was on fire in the minute prior before it's collapse too.
and no they cant be seen. those arent explosions. it is jets of dust caused by the enormous pressure that the enormous energy of the collapse created.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget It wasn't near that point though, it was more than 500 degrees away. And if those were just jets of dust, they would have flown out of every window on the floors where they supposedly flew out. And in any case, the towers were designed to withstand anything, including multiple impacts by aircraft. Not to mention the fact that they fell vertically, meaning that all 287 support columns must have given way at the same time for every few floors at a time. It's too circumstantial.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
for the last time. no one said it melted.
not all the floors had that capability. only the Sky Lobby floors had the capability.
the towers didnt collapse when the planes hit. have you even seen any footage? they fell 59 and 102 minutes later respectively. who said the planes alone caused the collapses?
and how could all of them have given way easily when the upper portion buckled inward BEFORE falling vertically and when it was only the impact zone and above that were even damaged?
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget I never said that the buildings fell on impact. And you're wrong about the sky lobby, every part of the building was built to withstand that type of attack, you made the part about the sky lobby up. And the upper portion buckeled vertically, it began to fall as soon as the bombs were detonated. The only way that a building can fall vertically is if all support beams are knocked out at the same time, gravity will bring it down. The only way that could have been done is with bombs.
Nukesgboomvirus 1 year ago
i never said you said that.
you didnt get what i meant. i was referring to the jets of dust only being able to come out of the Sky Lobby.
there were no bombs detonated. you dont need detonated bombs to make a building buckle. you didnt answer my question either.
911NeverForget 1 year ago
@911NeverForget Now why would the jets of dust only be able to come from the Sky Lobby when video footage clearly shows them coming from WTC up to 80 floors beneath the demolition wave? And I did answer your question, buildings do not collapse vertically unless all support columns are destroyed at the same time. Buckling is an effect of the building collapsing, not a cause. The cause of the buildings buckling was bombs, traces of the bombs were found in the wreckage. I need to go, I'll be back