1. Logic Lecture: Symbolic Logic

[khasab]

Your stomach might not hurt because you have eaten too much but taken a powerful analgesic

[khasab]

agh! the squeaky pen !

[dtobon22]

Thanks for the videos.

Thanks for the videos.

[ecaepevolhturt]

This is an example of raw intelligence; making the complex more mentally digestable. You are a good teacher!

[Chavis21]

wish i was in his class 

[pbfuddle]

Thank you for sharing.

[rparede1]

This video is an example of what my professor should be doing. Thank you so much!

[megokego]

I just wanna say, I love you.

[cataloger1kimberlya]

thanks for the video, it was very helpful. My name is Kimberly Anderson and I go to Ashford University. I did not understand this at all, until I saw your video. Again, thanks

[iyalovecky]

rule #5 isnt rule rule of inference at all

[Alexsteen]

After watching your lectures I was able to modus pwnus my classmates in debates.

[macgeek21]

this guy is making up his own symbols. there is no arrow or double arrows in SL

[spin467]

@macgeek21

→ = כ

[oregonsheepherder]

@macgeek21

¬ not sign

↔ if and only if

→ if then

Google logic symbols or buy a fucking book…dumb ass

[UTIFOREVER]

Thanks :)

[JediTheUnsung]

This guy saved my life.

[NetLurker03]

Thank you for Teaching Us! =))

[cirusMEDIA]

Great video!!

-->just need to plan your examples a bit more.

[ridebmxx3]

yeeee

[Coopersmith1000]

Love it! Thanks for posting!

[TheIrieFeeling]

Oh man, why can't you be my professor? Awesome job.

[tylerkenefick]

Thank you reading through my logic book my head was spinning, you've made this a lot clearer.

[GuitarmandanXo]

Thanks for being a bro! Keep up the great work!

[MirandaInClouds]

thank god i found you just in time! :D

[MohoganyFan]

Thank you for taking the time to post! I found this educational and helpful. Great introduction to Logic!

[PimpingRice]

Very logically simple I must say, helped a lot now I'm going to pass my Philosophy class hahaha!

[ProjektLament]

Very clear and concise. Thank you.

[MrAnthonyVance]

Ahhhh, yes, Logical Truth Sets -- I remember them from a math course I took many years back in college. Your lectures are always enriched by your visual displays. Your teaching is always very clear to me. Take a bow, Professor. You deserve applause!

[AshleyTaios]

Awesome! Keep posting videos :D

[epistte]

Thanks for posting this series on symbolic logic.

[81QD]

U r awesome Thanks!

[EEMAGiNation]

Great teacher

[MegaXavier76]

this video will help me pass logic.

[revengeofbutthead]

this is awesome lecture!

[Slipknot808]

Thanks for this video. This will definitely make studying easier.

[Nirish1183]

Thank you so much, that was very helpful and clear. I wish my professor was that clear. 7 Minutes of your video was more helpful than 10 weeks of class.

[aznlily124]

Thank you so much! I have to learn this topic independently for a class project and I was so confused. Your video's helped tremendously thank you!

[taostoner1]

interesting note, hypothetical syllogism is basically just modus ponens twice.

[taostoner1]

Ur a great teacher, get to a University.

[DocofPhil]

He should introduce the logical connectors, otherwise his lessons are excellent. Rules of inference are very effective to determine truthfulness of a syllogism. Actually there are 19 rules, some of which can be challenging.

[StarlyMusic]

My teacher is sooo unclear about these points!!

You are amazing for posting these!!!

[wtrezel]

You explain so clearly my friend. Thank you, I am a happy subscriber of your works.....

[himynameississy]

thanks so much! very well laid out

[qwertytrewq33]

ahahaha how to program an android

[longlivechairmanwow]

Great video. I had a question about Hypothetical Syllogisms. It seems that part of the rules of using HS would be that one does not get to use or build on A->C, since it always depends on the presence of A->B and B->C. Or another way of phrasing it might be: one can use A->C in subsequent steps, so long as the previous steps (A->B, B->C) are explicitly mentioned in all subsequent. Is that true?

[summergiles]

Thank you so much!!!!!!

[jreylbc1]

Great job! So many times I've seen these things explained in a complicated manner. Thanks for keeping it simple, to the point, and using meaningful examples.

[ezekiell666]

fantastic - I bow down to you my lord

[ImTooAbstract]

A lot better than MY teacher .

[1brennanma]

This was great thanks so much for the help!!! Please make more!!!

[DustinLowes]

you're the man. THANK YOU

[Europemaster]

Great presentation, thank, you, I understand these rules much better now. Anyway we learned two more in our discrete structures class, named simplification and addition/join (translated from slovene), it would be really good if you present them too.

[TheyFeedingULies]

Very nice video, good to see a brotha breaking the stereotype. Keep up the good work man.

[wingman13]

Great video, thanks!

[ivis65]

Thank you helped me a lot

[Manny5445]

You did a great job explaining this in a way that people can understand.

[jtrain9]

Thank you, this helped me somewhat.

[amjiva]

Nice video. When I learned this, we didn't utilize hypothetical syllogism in our system. If we wanted to get from A-->B and B-->C to A-->C, we'd have to make an assumption (conditional or indirect proof.) Also, our symbol for "and" was &.

[amjiva]

@jtrain9

Well, it was. Different systems use different symbols. The professor I had used &.

[cwieand]

Cool good to see someone posting on logic!

[Dheedh]

Thanks a lot!!!!!!

[cotefan92]

helpful thx

[tom123parker]

Great Video!! Very helpful since it is very confusing in most of the text books

[95TurboSol]

Thanks for the video, was really helpful!