Added: 2 years ago
From: RcFlyBy1
Views: 8,336
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its cool but you need more weight to that fly

  • nice job kid :D

  • Hes got my toy box!

  • your going to need much more wing surface area for that to fly , and some tips on the wings would make it much more stable , looks like a right aircraft tho , i wish you luck in building

  • i dont know why but i think that when i would build such an awesome plane i didnt want to ruin it by the engine that goes on so i would like umm remove those 2 triangles umm if u pause at 1:20 on the sides of the part where it makes the corner to the straight part and make inlets there so it is capable of having one or 2 impellers would be badass (i never desingd a plane myself but so it could be a bad idea and there is little room on second thought still very awesome)

  • i dont know why but i think that when i would build such an awesome plane i didnt want to ruin it by the engine that goes on so i would like umm remove those 2 triangles umm if u pause at 1:20 on the sides of the part where it makes the corner to the straight part and make inlets there so it is capable of having one or 2 impellers would be badass (i never desingd a plane myself but so it could be a bad idea still very awesome)

  • Looks really bas-ass!  Next generation stealth? Mate, time to recut it in Depron, and deck out to fly. Canards idea is a winner. Retracts will look great too. Probably worth doing some glide tests first to find the ideal CG location - it's a bit different with canards!

  • thanks! should i do canards and elevons or canards and ailerons? thanks in advance!

  • Comment removed

  • Awsome man!...looks so cool allready!!..use EPP...so much stronger.. .ill be staying tuned

    Jacques

  • thanks for the comment! and yea i think i'll use epp

  • Make sure to calculate the right place for that CG. I dont know how you should do it for this kind of shape. Its better to have it much too much to the front and not to the back. at least for the test flight.

  • yup, then i can adjust it

  • not right now no

  • good job!

    keep it up.....

    later

    tension888

  • I think you are going to want you Vertical Stab's to be much taller. I think that with how it is now. You will wash out on your turns. An no worries if you make them too tall. It's always better to over do it then not have enough. An you can always trim them up...

    Looks cool otherwise. Good luck on the build. Can't wait to see an update.

  • thanks for the suggestion, i'll be sure to do that!

  • Great job bud

  • thanks!

  • nice job flyby.. i would use epp foam instead.. this way u have much more flex if you crash.. it looks like the eurofighter... o an d di u do it yourself or use plans.. i f u designed it great job... just make sure to put all ur weight in the tront.. as the cg will be off

  • thanks, the cg is in the front but a little back. I was thinking it looked like the eurofighter too

  • It will be very instable since the CG will be at the back. You should use a gyro on the elevator.

  • true, but the cg is up front because of the large fuselage, plus i'll put the battery up there

  • Airplane frame looks very nice.

    Waiting to see to depron conatruction.

    Keep it that way. dont change the rudders.

    Where the CG ?

    Thats the most important parameter.

    Good luck !!!

  • thanks for the comment! the cg is up front but a little farther back than you would expect. I through the plane and it glides great!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more