The KJV says that life is in the blood (Lev 17:11)! The baby has blood relatively early (within the first two weeks). Darwin's teachings lead to the legalization of abortion! Study history you viper. Jesus called the Pharisees that, so why not call Ruckman it to for spitting out this vile poison? Also, what about Samson? Nazarite vow ring any bells? He was supposed to be one from the womb! His mom had to obey the rules while he was in her!
A 'gospel' that refuses to speak out against the slaughter of little babies is no gospel at all. The only hope for this man is that he repent. What about James 2:8 Doc? Aren't we supposed to love our neighbor as ourseleves? How bour rescue the perishing and caring for the dying, like the old hymnal says.. Right? Proverbs 31 8 9 10. Proverbs 24 10 12.
A 'gospel' that refuses to speak out against the slaughter of little babies is no gospel at all. The only hope for this man is that he repent. What about James 2:8 Doc? Aren't we supposed to love our neighbor as ourseleves? How bour rescue the perishing and caring for the dying, like the old hymnal says.. Right? Proverbs 31 8 9 10. Proverbs 24 10 12.
I went to Tennessee Temple and this is exactly why I don't go to church anymore. I worship at home. Lo, here is Christ, there is Christ. What nonsense. Jesus is THE WAY. Beyond that, it''s smoke and mirrors and whoever is passing the plate!. What a shame.
don't take this wrong,but you have a real bad mental problem. this man doctor Ruckman never said he supports abortion. he plainly said he does not think it murder. he said in this video you put on that he thinks and teaches that you don't get your soul untill you take your first breath.you need to get rid of your niv and get a kjv and read it yourself.I dont believe this teaching myself,God will show every man different things in his word.not every preacher is 100% but at leas he stands on it
Ruckman is really hard to take seriously enough to research, he is without a doubt, out and out wacky, anyone who says he isnt has never looked at one of his books or heard his teachings. The thing is the followers of his cult will continue to back no matter what he does or says. When you say out and out dumb things like that there are underground alien breeding facilities like on page 256 of "Black Is Beautiful" for instance, I say, yea, he is wacked out.
Yes, Dr. Ruckman is wrong about abortion and about segregation . He is right about everything else and still worth learning from. He is still the best teacher of the Bible on the planet. I can see where he could come to the wrong conclusions about those two beliefs . If a person wants to properly correct Dr. Ruckman , maybe they can remind him that there is air (Oxygen) already in the blood circulating in an unborn baby. Race in the Bible is only in reference to a running contest.
we need to pray for peter ruckman's soul. ruckman and his followers are on the path to hell if they DONT REPENT FROM THEIR SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN LIFESTYLE"!
@EscambiaMcSween Yah dude this guy took Ruckmans views way out of proportion. I think this guy needs to check up on his salvation, because only trully saved people can understand Ruckman.
We christians defend this man, because not only what he has done for the body of christ, leading over a thousand people to the Lord, but also because of what he has done in some of our lifes. Not to mention, his stance on THE Word of God. the KJV! you people who say he is a false prophet, and a heretic, u wouldnt even know what a false prophet and a heretic was if they slapped you in the back of the head, and called u stupid. Dr. Ruckman doesnt damn people to hell. He leads them to Christ.
I also noticed you're subscribed to TicToc MInistries but you don't like the idea that Peter Ruckman has had divorces but she is a WOMAN PREACHER? You're a hypocrite!
Even if he has had divorces he is most likely a better bible teacher/preacher than ANY preacher YOU listen to. At least he doesn't change the WORDS OF GOD! And just because he doesn't believe Abortion is murder DOESN'T mean he thinks it right! You're a nut.
I love how you said "... ad distortion of the Word of God." YOU'RE the one using a DISTORTED BIBLE. Your Nutty Idiots' version PERVERTS THE WORD OF GOD!
Dont Like Ruckman but Jesus did not have long hair. 1 Cor 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
spread the good news of Jesus Christ! Hey if people werent fornicating out of wedlock we wouldnt have abortions. Be fruitful and multiply. If u get raped have an obortion. He raped you kill his seed. Dont do him a favor and keep his lil hell baby. but thats RARELY the case. Its usually pigs that want kicks with no kids. oh yeah death penalty for the rapist.
@evilunixuser1 you are a fool, and u have no idea what you are talking about. DR. Ruckman has done more for the Body of Christ, than you could ever do in 30 lifetimes bud.
@evilunixuser1 you are a fool, and u have no idea what you are talking about. DR. Ruckman has done more for the Body of Christ, than you could ever do in 30 lifetimes bud.
If the KJV Only people are so Righteous and so ABOVE everybody else and only THEY have the Truth....then why to they BLOCK and Censor any comments that are NOT only KJV Only.
Ever notice that on their videos?
They also use Un Christian language and vile words against ANYONE who disagrees with their KJV Only Cult. I had some "good Christian" KJV only people call me every evil foul word in the book and condemned me to hell 10 times over.
That says a LOT about the KJV Only movement right there.
Thanks for posting this video. I read in a book that he was a little bit wacky. Now i am fully convinced that he was a heretic an full of the devil. The bible says that we will know other christians by their fruit, not by the bible translations they use.
@edpanu1960 you never met him and you never heard much of his teaching . Yes, I believe Dr. Ruckman is not correct about abortion and when a person became a living soul. To say though that he is wacky and an heretic is not correct either. Dr. Ruckman like any other man is human and not perfect. He is a very good Bible teacher on other subjects and very convining. He would be worth you reading some of his books and learning more abour why he believes other things. Proverb 22:1
does not suprise me that someone who wants to bash this preacher uses scripture references from two different bible translations. I bet they dont want to discuss all the verses that have been changed or completely taken out of the bible their reading. GOD himself deals with His messengers and when we judge the man of God we bring judgement on ourselves.
You think its okay to kill that which isn't human; else christianity would be also pro-animals rights and anti-hunting. The question is, when a human starts to be a human? To extend the question, when a seed starts to be a tree?
I think the answer is clear, seed and fetus are both tree and human, just in a different stage of life.
Thank you for this video. I will share it with as many as possible. This man is a monster for saying that the murdering of babies is ok. I hope that him and his followers repent.
Quite an interesting mix of topics going on in this video- Ruckman/abortion/your views on KJVO etc... You seem to tie Ruckman's views on abortion with being KJVOists. To tar all other KJVOists with the same brush you do Ruckman isn't very discerning.
You don't come to Ruckman's conclusion on abortion just by reading KJV. Rather, by being 'a clanging cymbal' - a man without the love of GOD in his heart - then you are easily led to such conclusions about abortion.
I did not tie all KJVOist to Ruckman's warped views on abortion. If it came across like that it is not my intent. The only KJVO people I've meet who support abortion are the Ruckman lemmings.
Now Dremias u are exactly what he was referring to when he said that about dresses and just a do nothing. Come on do something for the Lord and stop kicking about someone else. Read your Bible if you have one and see that it states "husband of one wife" is not divorce dont care how you spell it. And he does not state he is for abortion just that a fetus does not have a soul, where does it state in the Bible that he is wrong....?? WHERE WHERE....?
its a wonder that God puts up with us We run around nip picking about what this preacher says and how this one lives his life and come to find out that Jesus didnt come to this world ti straiten out the government put to save the lost from hell Doc saya some weird thing but he says some good things too so you just pick out the good and through out the rest and yes if you look hard enough you can get the Bible to say what you want it to say it just takes a little common sence
Dremias, people listen to the stuff this man teaches them because the Bible says there are those who have itching ears, who look for men who will tickle their ears. Ruckman tickles their ears. They want to hear and believe what he teaches.
How can you be a false prophet if you don't even clam to be a prophet? Do you know docter Ruckman? I've been going to his church for 10 years and I know he has never claimed to be a prophet.
Anamcadle95: a person does not have to proclaim themselves as a prophet to be one. A prophet is a person who is regarded as an inspired teacher or proclaimer of the will of God. Ruckman fits that definition. He is teaching what he says the Bible says and doesn't say. He is pushing his own personal beliefs while twisting Scripture to fit those beliefs. It's time to start believing what the word of God really says, not what a man tells you it says.
I don't understand why so many follow Ruckman. They even called themselves Ruckmanites. How silly is this? They are following a MAN! Ruckman is just a man, who sounds pretty arrogant. I don't think Ruckman is open to any criticism.
I agree with Ruckman's view on this topic. Think about it fellow Christians, if by chance a fertilized egg is a living breathing soul, then my miscarriages I had (in the first several days of fertilization) and my friends who have had many... well then, all those unborn non formed babies are in Heaven. Do you really think so?
He is wrong on abortion but not a heretic have you ever been to an Independant Baptist Church not every one their believes exactly the same but does that make some of them heretics no every man is allowed one right to an opinion and in saying that every man is also allowed to be an idiot but don't get me wrong ABORTION IS WRONG and to know that it is all you'd have to do is walk down to an abortion clinic and watch one be performed it would disgust you but not believing that doesnt make him...
I am a fundy and I used to attend a IFB church. The IFB in my area do not teach this garbage that Ruckman teaches. The IFB's in my area would call Ruckman a heretic because his views are heresy, regardless if these IFB disagree on minor things like dress codes, etc... they all agree on the doctrines of grace, sola scriptura, etc...
ok ok wow no indepedent baptists dont all agree the same way on some scriptures nor do they agree on doctrines of grace but the church pretty much abides by the pastors belief in most churches but my pastor and youth director dont say this is what happened go along with it they say this is what happened but you dont have to believe me you should research it yourself before believing it
So Ruckman is wrong. Romans 3:4 "God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged."
You fail to address that your NIV is missing literally 64,098 words, there was an English stylist lesbian on the translation commitee, and a sodomite heading up the entire O.T. 7th Day Adventists worked on the translation and you name it: 60 'scholars' from all denominations @ Calvin's college. Your NIV is an Ecumenical Rat's Nest. But all this is okay and Ruckman is a False Prophet b/c he teaches abortion is a sin but not murder per se? I h8 abortion but you have a log cabin in YOUR eye. Selah
Bookborn, so according to you we should reject a Bible translation if a sodomite was involved in its inception? I am dedicated AV preferential, I reject and am repulsed by homosexual practice. However to reject homosexuals is in my mind unchristlike, we are to love the sinner and hate the sin are we not? And if I was to reject a Bible because a homosexual was involved id have to reject the AV as James I of England is a well known and historically documented homosexual. But I wont, I love the AV.
Point is, you've exalted yourself (Holier than Ruckman). You cherry-pick some things you don't like and call him a heretic. Damnable heresy is one thing, but what DAMNABLE heresy does Ruckman teach? We're all eyes. Say on. Also, Titus 3 says that a heretic, after the first and 2nd admonition, reject. Have you admonished him? I don't agree with Ruckman on the abortion teaching, but this is not DAMNABLE heresy. This now makes him a FALSE PROPHET? Your disgust is autobiographical in nature.
How wicked. To spue forth hatred for a man who has defended the Bible for over half a century now and read the Bible thru over 200 times, who is 87 years old and STILL soul-winning and preaching (he doesn't believe in retiring) - you shoot yourself in the foot. Also, Ruckman teaches that abortion is a sin in most cases but not murder. I don't agree, but you strain at a gnat and swallow a camel. The NIV chairman of the O.T., Marten Wouldstra, was a sodomite. Virginia Mollencott is a Lesbian. Dumb
look who the false prophet is ........ using the NIV! ....... why didn't you play all of it? afraid dr ruckman would give to much scripture to back up his claims ...... seems to me you have something to hide ....... your attacks are shallow! ........ you proved so very little. I have yet to see dr ruckman say anything that he couldn't back up with at least three references of scripture that are in the contexts ...... and yes I have been looking for a long time ...... grow up!
If miscarrige is a murder. Every women should have life sentence in jail, or face the electric chair. Answer me this if 3 months pregnent woman will have car accedent and will die, how many coffins you'll need to get 1 or 2. EXODUS 21:22 clealy says that loosing the fruit from the pregnant woman is not a murder.
In the words of the A.V. open in front of me this verse pertains to the husband of the, (pregnant), woman hurt having the right to punish the offender concerned even to the extreme of eye for eye, life for life, should the Judges so determine. It refers to assault, resulting in the death of the child, NOT voluntary abortion. Are you familiar with the term exegesis?
I see you also refer to miscarriage, where are you coming from? Do you really feel that a woman has lost her baby through no fault of her own that she should be punished? Even unto death? What is your point? In fact, what sort of person are you? O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (or in your case typeth). Matt 12:34 1769 Authorised Version.
I'm always amazed at the hopes people will jump through to defend the heretic Ruckman.
Your logic is flawed and twisted at best.
What Ruckman teaches about abortion is exactly what Satan wants us to believe. If Christianity will accept abortion as not murder, then the same people will accept other Satanic dogmas.
Ruckmanites only give lip service to believing every word in the AV, because when their "messiah" speaks the word they follow him instead of Jesus.
Like I first said, I disagree with Ruckman about abortion. However, he does have scripture on his side (just like you do).
Further, I just showed you that by conservative estimates, heaven will hold more miscarried babies than Christians by a factor of 40, 50, or maybe a 100.
His position is wrong in my opinion but it is not the slam dunk case that you present. Besides your attacks on him, which prove zip, your obvious hatred for the man has blinded you to how pathetic your own arguments are.
In Genesis 35:11 God told Jacob that he had kings in his loins. He didn't. He had descendants who were kings. Are you going to claim that this verse is figurative while the others were literal?
Then you have the problem with miscarriages. Wikipedia says that as many as 25% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. That means that over the past 6,000 years, there could be 10 billion babies in heaven who were never born. (not counting their grandchildren!)
Hebrews 7:9-10 says that Levi paid tithes while he was in the "loins of Abraham". So are you going to contend that every little sperm I have had in my life is a person? What about the 1,000s of sperm that didn't make it when my three children were born?
Levi wasn't even Abraham's son. He was his grandson. Are you going to claim that I have my grandchildren "in my loins"?
That is what the verse says. I don't know any serious pro-life people who claim that all semen is human life.
I disagree with Ruckman's position but your video is a waste of time and a horrible counter point to what he claims. How many times did you ask for him to provide you scripture for his argument? It is Genesis 2:7. Do you have that verse in your Bible? Do you have an answer for that verse? That contradicts what you said. Explain it.
His three marriages? What does that have to do with abortion? You claim he throws up red herrings and then you write that!
In addition to this, think of the sin he commits against the American people. Sooner or later the muslims are going to hear of his teachings and falsely equate it with Christian belief, thus validating in thier own minds another excuse, (like the Philistines in regards Israel), for the attack of America. It is time for all American Christians to oppose this aborent practice. To sacrifice a child of God in his own house, (womb), is an abomination beyond words...
In order to be a child of God, one must be born again into His family. A child in the womb is a creation of God, not a child of God. Today, since the fall man is created in the image of Adam. I in no way support abortion. I believe it is murder. I also believe what the Bible says is true and to accuse someone using the wrong argument is just as much an abomination. Judge righteous judgment.
What Ruckman preaches is heresy and supports murder. There is no way to spin this fact. The bible commands us to call these heretics out by name. I am simply doing what the Bible tells me to do.
Where do the babies in the womb end up? Heaven or Hell? Clearly God sees them as children.
"Babies" are not "murdered in the womb" as the definition of "Baby" refers to one born. The Bible does not see fetus's as living souls, they are non-existent spiritually and do not go anywhere.
Job 10:19 I should have been as though I had not been; I should have been carried from the womb to the grave.
There are times when "untimely birth" is preferrable to life:
Ecc 6:3 If a man beget an hundred children, and live many years, so that the days of his years be many, and his soul be not filled with good, and also that he have no burial; I say, that an untimely birth is better than he.
Parental rights were absolute in the Bible, and included capital punishment and religious sacrifice of the child:
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified ..when he had offered Isaac..upon the altar?
Jdg 11:31 Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the LORD'S, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering.
Jdg 11:34 And Jephthah came to Mizpeh unto his house, and, behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child; beside her he had neither son nor daughter.
It seems the Bible called this "thing" in the womb a baby.
Romans 3:4 (KJV)
3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
The Bible does not see the fetus as a living soul??? Iv heard about them counterfeit King James Bibles, and even have a few vids in my favorites to highlite what id thought was a ridiculous assertion. But I see from your comment that id better take it more seriously as your copy must be worse than most, id get a new Bible if I was you bro. Yours obviously goes beyond spelling changes and drops whole verses...
No actually it doesn't. I know that comes as a surprise to someone who never reads it themselves, but actually even the words used over 700 times, defines life begining with breath at birth. (700 times) That's a little hard to actually honestly just miss.
700 times, hmmmm? Interesting, please in all your wisdom why it was that John the Baptist leapt in the womb at the presence of Jesus in the womb of Mary?
700 times, hmmmm? Continued... The word birth appears in the KJV 15 times, breath 42 times, life 450 times, beginning 106 times. But as a combination? 0 times... If yours states this 700 times, then I suggest you return your Bible to the shop and ask for your money back, it must be one of those counterfeits. Either that or Dremias's reference to Romans 3:4 most definately applies in your case.
Luke 1:11-14 (New American Standard Bible) 11 And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense. 12 Zacharias was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear gripped him. 13 But the angel said to him, "Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your petition has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will give him the name John. 14 "You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth.
15 For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mothers womb.
Perhaps RadioFree you would also like to explain: Judges 13:7, 16:7. or Job 3:11 or try Jeremiah 1:5 for size, what about Jeremiah 20:17 or Psa 22:10, 58:3, 71:6, 127:3, or try Ecc 11:5 or Isa 48:8, 49:1... Please explain??? Then the word of the Lord came unto me saying, Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, [and] I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. Jeremiah 1: 4-5 AV 1769.
If you use the discipline of Grammatical-Linguistics to actually read the text you will see at no point was "spirit" attributed to the fetus. The English translation says the "Babe leaped for Joy", which makes it sound as if it was the one haivng "The Joy", but it is clear if you look at statement, the "Joy" was Mary's "Joy", and it was Mary, not the fetus, that was "filled with the Spirit". That is a very important distinction showing that the NT writers followed Jewish Halakah.
There are two videos which survey the Old and New Testament on my channel which I would encourage you to veiw which address most of what you are referencing. The Bible does not teach life begins at conception, that is why it was a teaching that was condemned as a HERESY. I don't know how many times you have to hear that before it actually sinks in.
1025.βρέφος brephos; a prim. word; an unborn or a newborn child— babies(2), baby(4), childhood(1), infants(1).
Thomas, R. L. (1998, 1981). New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek dictionaries : Updated edition (H8674). Anaheim: Foundation Publications, Inc.
RadioFree... "It is clear" you say? Well Gods inspired scriptures have something else to say. How can, "and HE shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mothers womb", be referring to Elisabeth? Is she a HE? Do you claim she returned to her own womb to be filled with the Spirit in Luke 1:15? Yours has got to be one of the worst scripture twisting examples iv seen, in more ways than one... Your twisting it to attempt to condone MURDER! Im sorry you find this so confusing, but you need
I would encourage Mr Ruckman to read the book of Ezekiel, it has rather a lot to say about idolatry, it also goes on to speak of child sacrifice and the abominination that it is. Even the Philisitines found this practice of the children of Israel aborent at this time. Dont worship your Bible Mr Ruckman, READ IT... He commits an abomination against the Lord and all mankind when he encourages child sacrifice, and brings the faith into disrepute. Does his Godlessness know no bounds?
You are a pretty big man challenging Dr. Ruckman on some website. Why don't you go challenge him to his face? Not to mention, read Ezekiel yourself and keep it in context. I do not support abortion whatsoever, but I also don't support accusing someone of something using verses out of context. Abortion today is not birthing your child and then offering it up as a sacrifice to a god such as Molech. While you are reading, take a look at how David treated Saul.
This preacher might be a looney-bird on all the other things mentioned in your comments, from his understanding of demonology to his rediculous claims about the 1611 KJV, but... it is not the belief that abortion is not murder, that is "heresy", but the opposite. The Anti-abortion doctrine is a false doctrine from the middle-ages which infiltrated the Church of Rome. It is called "Traducianism", and yes, it is actually a "heresy".
For people to call themselves Christians and defend abortion is the most absurd thing that I have ever heard! What if Mary would have decided to abort Jesus? What if Elizabeth would have aborted John the Baptist? What if Paul's mother would've aborted him? The list can go on and on. Abortion is murder. Period. And we know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him according the scriptures.
"Defending abortion" is not what I did. I said that the heresy known as TRADUCIANISM is unbiblical. Has been known to be unbiblical for literal thousands of years. Is directly contradicted by hundreds of texts in the BIble... even the very definition of the words themselves "Living","Spirit","Soul". To insert one's political prejudices into the text of the BIble and equate it to God's own word is deception. It is handling the word of God deceitfully, and it it wrong, no matter the cause.
PS. On defending abortion... it's not quite as simple as your religious-reich leader has claimed. The Bible grants parental rights to parents, not the state or the government. The parental rights given in the Bible were absolute, even after they were born. You cannot justify legalizing state ownership of fetus's using the Bible, it is an utter and complete lie. Do you think LYING is "Christian"? Do you think then using God's name in vain to do it, is "Christian"?
I didn't know you had a new video. I like it. I think that people can be KJVO without being mean-spirited toward those who aren't. I think the one group can respectfully disagree with the other. From what I've seen, the KJV appears to be the best version, but at the same time, I don't plan to go on to your channel and call you names because you came to a different conclusion. I think some of these KJVO people should take that into consideration. :) I'd give this 5 stars, but ratings are off.
I see you all are far to high in the clouds for you to see us preachers and teachers of the Word here on the ground.
God have mercy on you all if you ever get caught teaching even ONE thing that any of the brethren considers heresy. As for me and my house, we shall serve the Lord and grow in the teachings of brother Ruckman. I have no doubt in my mind that this brother has a crown greater than any of us, laid up in heaven.
So are you saying that you oppose the word of God in the A.V? Beware brother, God will not be mocked, it seems many in the KJVo movement simply ignore the words of the Bible they pertain to uphold and make up their own doctrine as they please... This is NOT a criticism, but a plea to repentance... Why defend a heretic? Does this not tar you with the same brush? Turn away from false teachings and turn towards Jesus for your own sake and that of your family.
This is a dangerous statement voidengineer because you are placing a false prophet above the Word of the Most High. Seriously you need to consider what you are saying.
The Scriptures prove Ruckman is a false prophet. Come out from under this heretic and follow Jesus.
Don't let the man made myth of KJVOism blind you to the truth about Ruckman.
The teaching from Ruckman in this video alone should be enough to make all who sat under him pack up and leave. His teachings presented in this video is pure heresy that contradicts the Word of the Most High.
I fear this statement holds true yet again because the same pardon will never be given to a non-KJVO:
"KJVOism pardons a multitude of sins and heresies as long as the offending party is a KJVOist."
In eternity, THE CHRISTIAN IS IN NEW JERUSALEM; he is in his apartment house that is made out of transparent gold, like clear glass. ... He is called out on trips, and these trips take him to Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, Uranus, etc. transporting couples into gardens placing them down and saying, be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth (The Unknown Bible, p. 592). Peter Ruckman
I KNOW THEY [DEMONS] HAVE TO BE SMALL. ... theres two little animals that have wings. Ones a fly and the others a mosquito. Know what these things are? Theyre pictures of demons. all commentaries, and all theologians, theyre winged. THE THINGS HAVE WINGS (Ruckman, Demons and Christians, Bible Baptist Bookstore, 1976, side 1).
The A.V. 1611 reading, here, is superior to any Greek text (Peter Ruckman, The Christians Handbook of Manuscript Evidence, Pensacola Bible Press, 1970, p. 118).
Mistakes in the A.V. 1611 are advanced revelation! (Ruckman, Manuscript Evidence, p. 126).
A short handbook, such as this, will not permit an exhaustive account of the marvelous undesigned coincidences which have slipped through the A.V. 1611 committees, unawares to them, and which give advanced light, and advanced revelation beyond the investigation of the greatest Bible students 300 year later (Ruckman, Manuscript Evidence, p. 127).
If you are able to obtain a copy [of Ruckmans proposed new book] you will have, in your hands, a minimum of 200 advanced revelations that came from the inerrant English text, that were completely overlooked (or ignored) by every major Christian scholar since 90 A.D. (Bible Believers Bulletin, Jan. 1994, pp. 2,4).
The King James test is the last and final statement that God has given to the world, and He has given it in the universal language of the 20th century ... The truth is that GOD SLAMMED THE DOOR OF REVELATION SHUT IN 389 BC AND SLAMMED IT SHUT AGAIN IN 1611 (Peter Ruckman, The Monarch of Books, Pensacola, 1973, p. 9)
God has ordained on this earth 12 boundaries, with 12 nations, who are destined to leave this earth (transported by angels--Luke 16:22), and populate outer space infinitely and forever, beginning with the 12 constellations that are seen on the earth once every 12 months (The Unknown Bible, p. 588).Peter Ruckman
What I find amazing is how people can follow these types of false prophets. It's amazing that Gail(god and) Riplinger and Sam Gipp are ever so silent about Ruckman's heresies, but then again KJVOism pardons a multitude of sins and heresies as long as the offending party is KJVO.
You sure talk a lot about other mens sins, without backing a word up with a piece of Scripture. Ruckman has lead more men and women to Christ than you could hope to, and he's trained dozens of Bible believing pastors all over the world. Who are you to judge another mans work in Christ?
False prophet Ruckman uses no Scripture and twist Scripture to support his heresy. Refer to this video for the my Scriptural support debunking this false prophet.
I am commanded to call those out who preach heresy. Refer to the Scriptures listed in this video. Did you even watch this video?
It's amazing how people give Ruckman the pardon just because he is KJVO. The bottom line is you should follow Jesus and not this leper messiah who is a puppet of Satan spreading heresies and lies.
1 Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer, he desires a noble task. 2 Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.
5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?) 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7 He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.
Please tell me where is the Scriptures that supports Ruckman's claim about babies not being humans until they take a breath of life. Where is this in the Bible?
So you want Scripture? Then try this for size... This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith. Tit 1:13. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Gal 1:9. Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thee camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. Jer 1:5.
For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy. Luke 1:44. In his recorded sermon Mr Ruckman claims in his own words to be an "old dog". But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. 2 Peter 2:22. In fact I suggest you read 2 Peter 2:12-22. This is what the Lord has to say in the A.V. Clear enough???
The KJV says that life is in the blood (Lev 17:11)! The baby has blood relatively early (within the first two weeks). Darwin's teachings lead to the legalization of abortion! Study history you viper. Jesus called the Pharisees that, so why not call Ruckman it to for spitting out this vile poison? Also, what about Samson? Nazarite vow ring any bells? He was supposed to be one from the womb! His mom had to obey the rules while he was in her!
shortperson20 2 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A 'gospel' that refuses to speak out against the slaughter of little babies is no gospel at all. The only hope for this man is that he repent. What about James 2:8 Doc? Aren't we supposed to love our neighbor as ourseleves? How bour rescue the perishing and caring for the dying, like the old hymnal says.. Right? Proverbs 31 8 9 10. Proverbs 24 10 12.
MrProverbs318 2 weeks ago
A 'gospel' that refuses to speak out against the slaughter of little babies is no gospel at all. The only hope for this man is that he repent. What about James 2:8 Doc? Aren't we supposed to love our neighbor as ourseleves? How bour rescue the perishing and caring for the dying, like the old hymnal says.. Right? Proverbs 31 8 9 10. Proverbs 24 10 12.
MrProverbs318 2 weeks ago
Abortion is murder
Narrowroadchapel 1 month ago
This person obviously has no idea where the NIV comes from...
stimetz420 1 month ago
Good video, a balanced presentation, and worth viewing.
peterpulpitpounder 3 months ago
Ruckman is full of himself, and so are many of his disciples. In my humble opinion, He greatly lacks humility and grace.
peterpulpitpounder 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I understand that KJV means king james version but what does NIV stand for?? NASB??
catman63879 4 months ago
Comment removed
catman63879 4 months ago
I went to Tennessee Temple and this is exactly why I don't go to church anymore. I worship at home. Lo, here is Christ, there is Christ. What nonsense. Jesus is THE WAY. Beyond that, it''s smoke and mirrors and whoever is passing the plate!. What a shame.
markbrewer1000 5 months ago
Thank you for exposing this quack! The Lord be with you.
miracleboy1 6 months ago
Sorry gang, but Dr. Ruckman is cool.
Videos bad mouthing mother terry can be found, or anyother "godly person".
ww5776 6 months ago
War Ruckman.he is the greatest teacher alive today you heretic.
blutobelushi 7 months ago
he is right.you are as wrong as can be.
blutobelushi 7 months ago
don't take this wrong,but you have a real bad mental problem. this man doctor Ruckman never said he supports abortion. he plainly said he does not think it murder. he said in this video you put on that he thinks and teaches that you don't get your soul untill you take your first breath.you need to get rid of your niv and get a kjv and read it yourself.I dont believe this teaching myself,God will show every man different things in his word.not every preacher is 100% but at leas he stands on it
dswa2286 7 months ago
Ruckman is really hard to take seriously enough to research, he is without a doubt, out and out wacky, anyone who says he isnt has never looked at one of his books or heard his teachings. The thing is the followers of his cult will continue to back no matter what he does or says. When you say out and out dumb things like that there are underground alien breeding facilities like on page 256 of "Black Is Beautiful" for instance, I say, yea, he is wacked out.
GISMoron 7 months ago
This sermon is wicked, Ruckman will answer to God for it too. Thanks for the exposure
Tumenihobbies 8 months ago
Yes, Dr. Ruckman is wrong about abortion and about segregation . He is right about everything else and still worth learning from. He is still the best teacher of the Bible on the planet. I can see where he could come to the wrong conclusions about those two beliefs . If a person wants to properly correct Dr. Ruckman , maybe they can remind him that there is air (Oxygen) already in the blood circulating in an unborn baby. Race in the Bible is only in reference to a running contest.
1979Gilbert 8 months ago
we need to pray for peter ruckman's soul. ruckman and his followers are on the path to hell if they DONT REPENT FROM THEIR SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN LIFESTYLE"!
bornagainjessie 10 months ago
@EscambiaMcSween Yah dude this guy took Ruckmans views way out of proportion. I think this guy needs to check up on his salvation, because only trully saved people can understand Ruckman.
hathcock16 1 year ago
We christians defend this man, because not only what he has done for the body of christ, leading over a thousand people to the Lord, but also because of what he has done in some of our lifes. Not to mention, his stance on THE Word of God. the KJV! you people who say he is a false prophet, and a heretic, u wouldnt even know what a false prophet and a heretic was if they slapped you in the back of the head, and called u stupid. Dr. Ruckman doesnt damn people to hell. He leads them to Christ.
NewCreature91 1 year ago
@NewCreature91 REPENT! TURN OR BURN, RUCKMANITE!
bornagainjessie 10 months ago
I also noticed you're subscribed to TicToc MInistries but you don't like the idea that Peter Ruckman has had divorces but she is a WOMAN PREACHER? You're a hypocrite!
RyuXHalo 1 year ago
Even if he has had divorces he is most likely a better bible teacher/preacher than ANY preacher YOU listen to. At least he doesn't change the WORDS OF GOD! And just because he doesn't believe Abortion is murder DOESN'T mean he thinks it right! You're a nut.
I love how you said "... ad distortion of the Word of God." YOU'RE the one using a DISTORTED BIBLE. Your Nutty Idiots' version PERVERTS THE WORD OF GOD!
RyuXHalo 1 year ago
Dont Like Ruckman but Jesus did not have long hair. 1 Cor 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
Vikuulin 1 year ago
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
spread the good news of Jesus Christ! Hey if people werent fornicating out of wedlock we wouldnt have abortions. Be fruitful and multiply. If u get raped have an obortion. He raped you kill his seed. Dont do him a favor and keep his lil hell baby. but thats RARELY the case. Its usually pigs that want kicks with no kids. oh yeah death penalty for the rapist.
pAtZeLtM 1 year ago
Yeah your an old heretic.
holyroller71 1 year ago
He said "I'll grant you the child is an organism." A child is just an organism? This is a sick, sick man.
rrrrsssssssa2 1 year ago
Of course Dr. Ruckman supports abortion. He needs a reason why he's on his 3rd wife. This man is a cancer in the Body of Christ.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
@evilunixuser1 you are a fool, and u have no idea what you are talking about. DR. Ruckman has done more for the Body of Christ, than you could ever do in 30 lifetimes bud.
NewCreature91 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@evilunixuser1 you are a fool, and u have no idea what you are talking about. DR. Ruckman has done more for the Body of Christ, than you could ever do in 30 lifetimes bud.
NewCreature91 1 year ago
Of course Dr. Ruckman supports abortion. He needs a reason why he's on his 3rd wife. This man is a cancer in the Body of Christ.
evilunixuser1 1 year ago
I wonder if his view of abortion has any thing to do with his lack of respect for women or did he get one of his girlfriends knocked up?
chrisgfro1000 1 year ago
If the KJV Only people are so Righteous and so ABOVE everybody else and only THEY have the Truth....then why to they BLOCK and Censor any comments that are NOT only KJV Only.
Ever notice that on their videos?
They also use Un Christian language and vile words against ANYONE who disagrees with their KJV Only Cult. I had some "good Christian" KJV only people call me every evil foul word in the book and condemned me to hell 10 times over.
That says a LOT about the KJV Only movement right there.
PaulDougouba 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this video. I read in a book that he was a little bit wacky. Now i am fully convinced that he was a heretic an full of the devil. The bible says that we will know other christians by their fruit, not by the bible translations they use.
edpanu1960 1 year ago
@edpanu1960 you never met him and you never heard much of his teaching . Yes, I believe Dr. Ruckman is not correct about abortion and when a person became a living soul. To say though that he is wacky and an heretic is not correct either. Dr. Ruckman like any other man is human and not perfect. He is a very good Bible teacher on other subjects and very convining. He would be worth you reading some of his books and learning more abour why he believes other things. Proverb 22:1
1979Gilbert 8 months ago
what a sicko
electronictrip 1 year ago
Oh, great, I saw a video like this almost. Somebody framed the guy
tootyfruity9514 1 year ago
does not suprise me that someone who wants to bash this preacher uses scripture references from two different bible translations. I bet they dont want to discuss all the verses that have been changed or completely taken out of the bible their reading. GOD himself deals with His messengers and when we judge the man of God we bring judgement on ourselves.
kennylee1970 2 years ago 8
@kennylee1970
Changed from the original or from the KJV?
HeresyHunter1711 1 year ago
@kennylee1970 thats right dude, Ruckman is a Man of God, and like you said he uses the KJV 1611 only so this guy has nothing Ruckman.
hathcock16 1 year ago
@hathcock16 REPENT WHILE YOU ARE STILL ALIVE.
bornagainjessie 10 months ago
Peter Ruckman sounds like someone preaching with their mouth full of peanutbutter & marshmallows
evilunixuser1 2 years ago
The question in this topic, I shall extend.
You think its okay to kill that which isn't human; else christianity would be also pro-animals rights and anti-hunting. The question is, when a human starts to be a human? To extend the question, when a seed starts to be a tree?
I think the answer is clear, seed and fetus are both tree and human, just in a different stage of life.
Windwolf001 2 years ago
Thank you for this video. I will share it with as many as possible. This man is a monster for saying that the murdering of babies is ok. I hope that him and his followers repent.
seanpaynedotnet 2 years ago
Quite an interesting mix of topics going on in this video- Ruckman/abortion/your views on KJVO etc... You seem to tie Ruckman's views on abortion with being KJVOists. To tar all other KJVOists with the same brush you do Ruckman isn't very discerning.
You don't come to Ruckman's conclusion on abortion just by reading KJV. Rather, by being 'a clanging cymbal' - a man without the love of GOD in his heart - then you are easily led to such conclusions about abortion.
Thanks for showing his views.
RPM11111 2 years ago 2
I did not tie all KJVOist to Ruckman's warped views on abortion. If it came across like that it is not my intent. The only KJVO people I've meet who support abortion are the Ruckman lemmings.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
Now Dremias u are exactly what he was referring to when he said that about dresses and just a do nothing. Come on do something for the Lord and stop kicking about someone else. Read your Bible if you have one and see that it states "husband of one wife" is not divorce dont care how you spell it. And he does not state he is for abortion just that a fetus does not have a soul, where does it state in the Bible that he is wrong....?? WHERE WHERE....?
Gadhouser 3 weeks ago
@Gadhouser
And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:
John 1:41
yurikimacau 2 weeks ago
This guy is a clear IDIOT!!!!! Ignorant of the Bible. Read the Bible before you judge ignorant!
prudy123 2 years ago
Be sure to judge righteous judgment and not as a hypocrite.
kjv3n1 2 years ago
its a wonder that God puts up with us We run around nip picking about what this preacher says and how this one lives his life and come to find out that Jesus didnt come to this world ti straiten out the government put to save the lost from hell Doc saya some weird thing but he says some good things too so you just pick out the good and through out the rest and yes if you look hard enough you can get the Bible to say what you want it to say it just takes a little common sence
smilly39 2 years ago
Dremias, people listen to the stuff this man teaches them because the Bible says there are those who have itching ears, who look for men who will tickle their ears. Ruckman tickles their ears. They want to hear and believe what he teaches.
CautiousSaint 2 years ago
How can you be a false prophet if you don't even clam to be a prophet? Do you know docter Ruckman? I've been going to his church for 10 years and I know he has never claimed to be a prophet.
GOD BLESS DR. RUCKMAN! A MAN OF GOD
anamcardle95 2 years ago
Anamcadle95: a person does not have to proclaim themselves as a prophet to be one. A prophet is a person who is regarded as an inspired teacher or proclaimer of the will of God. Ruckman fits that definition. He is teaching what he says the Bible says and doesn't say. He is pushing his own personal beliefs while twisting Scripture to fit those beliefs. It's time to start believing what the word of God really says, not what a man tells you it says.
CautiousSaint 2 years ago
Adam breathing the breath of life is a weak argument, his circumstances were alot different than that of a normal baby that is born of a woman.
pickin88 2 years ago
By the way, can anybody tell me if it's true that Ruckman lives together with a woman without being married to her? Is this true?
BamBamBentley 2 years ago
I don't understand why so many follow Ruckman. They even called themselves Ruckmanites. How silly is this? They are following a MAN! Ruckman is just a man, who sounds pretty arrogant. I don't think Ruckman is open to any criticism.
BamBamBentley 2 years ago
I agree with Ruckman's view on this topic. Think about it fellow Christians, if by chance a fertilized egg is a living breathing soul, then my miscarriages I had (in the first several days of fertilization) and my friends who have had many... well then, all those unborn non formed babies are in Heaven. Do you really think so?
Riesedge 2 years ago
He is wrong on abortion but not a heretic have you ever been to an Independant Baptist Church not every one their believes exactly the same but does that make some of them heretics no every man is allowed one right to an opinion and in saying that every man is also allowed to be an idiot but don't get me wrong ABORTION IS WRONG and to know that it is all you'd have to do is walk down to an abortion clinic and watch one be performed it would disgust you but not believing that doesnt make him...
yoshiki356 2 years ago
I am a fundy and I used to attend a IFB church. The IFB in my area do not teach this garbage that Ruckman teaches. The IFB's in my area would call Ruckman a heretic because his views are heresy, regardless if these IFB disagree on minor things like dress codes, etc... they all agree on the doctrines of grace, sola scriptura, etc...
Dremias5545 2 years ago
ok ok wow no indepedent baptists dont all agree the same way on some scriptures nor do they agree on doctrines of grace but the church pretty much abides by the pastors belief in most churches but my pastor and youth director dont say this is what happened go along with it they say this is what happened but you dont have to believe me you should research it yourself before believing it
yoshiki356 2 years ago
So Ruckman is wrong. Romans 3:4 "God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged."
eagle12687 2 years ago
You fail to address that your NIV is missing literally 64,098 words, there was an English stylist lesbian on the translation commitee, and a sodomite heading up the entire O.T. 7th Day Adventists worked on the translation and you name it: 60 'scholars' from all denominations @ Calvin's college. Your NIV is an Ecumenical Rat's Nest. But all this is okay and Ruckman is a False Prophet b/c he teaches abortion is a sin but not murder per se? I h8 abortion but you have a log cabin in YOUR eye. Selah
Bookborn 2 years ago
Bookborn, so according to you we should reject a Bible translation if a sodomite was involved in its inception? I am dedicated AV preferential, I reject and am repulsed by homosexual practice. However to reject homosexuals is in my mind unchristlike, we are to love the sinner and hate the sin are we not? And if I was to reject a Bible because a homosexual was involved id have to reject the AV as James I of England is a well known and historically documented homosexual. But I wont, I love the AV.
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
Point is, you've exalted yourself (Holier than Ruckman). You cherry-pick some things you don't like and call him a heretic. Damnable heresy is one thing, but what DAMNABLE heresy does Ruckman teach? We're all eyes. Say on. Also, Titus 3 says that a heretic, after the first and 2nd admonition, reject. Have you admonished him? I don't agree with Ruckman on the abortion teaching, but this is not DAMNABLE heresy. This now makes him a FALSE PROPHET? Your disgust is autobiographical in nature.
Bookborn 2 years ago
Examples - look at my other Ruckman videos.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
How wicked. To spue forth hatred for a man who has defended the Bible for over half a century now and read the Bible thru over 200 times, who is 87 years old and STILL soul-winning and preaching (he doesn't believe in retiring) - you shoot yourself in the foot. Also, Ruckman teaches that abortion is a sin in most cases but not murder. I don't agree, but you strain at a gnat and swallow a camel. The NIV chairman of the O.T., Marten Wouldstra, was a sodomite. Virginia Mollencott is a Lesbian. Dumb
Bookborn 2 years ago
Typical spin to defend Ruckman by using Ruckman's age, works, and number of times he read the Bible.
Showing the facts is not hatred. Speaking out against a heretic like Ruckman is called discernment.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
look who the false prophet is ........ using the NIV! ....... why didn't you play all of it? afraid dr ruckman would give to much scripture to back up his claims ...... seems to me you have something to hide ....... your attacks are shallow! ........ you proved so very little. I have yet to see dr ruckman say anything that he couldn't back up with at least three references of scripture that are in the contexts ...... and yes I have been looking for a long time ...... grow up!
TCAP4444 2 years ago
If you take Ruckman seriously then you're crazier than this loony old man.
I take his rants for comedic effect and little else and if you do otherwise you ARE crazier and nuttier than him.
johnnynovacaine 2 years ago
If miscarrige is a murder. Every women should have life sentence in jail, or face the electric chair. Answer me this if 3 months pregnent woman will have car accedent and will die, how many coffins you'll need to get 1 or 2. EXODUS 21:22 clealy says that loosing the fruit from the pregnant woman is not a murder.
HaRdzstylerR 2 years ago
In the words of the A.V. open in front of me this verse pertains to the husband of the, (pregnant), woman hurt having the right to punish the offender concerned even to the extreme of eye for eye, life for life, should the Judges so determine. It refers to assault, resulting in the death of the child, NOT voluntary abortion. Are you familiar with the term exegesis?
KiwiGraceboy 2 years ago
I see you also refer to miscarriage, where are you coming from? Do you really feel that a woman has lost her baby through no fault of her own that she should be punished? Even unto death? What is your point? In fact, what sort of person are you? O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. (or in your case typeth). Matt 12:34 1769 Authorised Version.
KiwiGraceboy 2 years ago
I'm always amazed at the hopes people will jump through to defend the heretic Ruckman.
Your logic is flawed and twisted at best.
What Ruckman teaches about abortion is exactly what Satan wants us to believe. If Christianity will accept abortion as not murder, then the same people will accept other Satanic dogmas.
Ruckmanites only give lip service to believing every word in the AV, because when their "messiah" speaks the word they follow him instead of Jesus.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
Correction: I wrote 'semen' a few posts down when I meant to say 'sperm.'
Greywolf82 2 years ago
I'm always amazed at how people try to defend this racist heretic.
The bottom line is Ruckman is a heretic and false prophet. Just because he uses Scriptures does not mean his distortion of the Scripture is correct.
No where have I ever said that I hate Ruckman. I'm just following the Bible's commandments and calling out heretics by name.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
Like I first said, I disagree with Ruckman about abortion. However, he does have scripture on his side (just like you do).
Further, I just showed you that by conservative estimates, heaven will hold more miscarried babies than Christians by a factor of 40, 50, or maybe a 100.
His position is wrong in my opinion but it is not the slam dunk case that you present. Besides your attacks on him, which prove zip, your obvious hatred for the man has blinded you to how pathetic your own arguments are.
Greywolf82 2 years ago
In Genesis 35:11 God told Jacob that he had kings in his loins. He didn't. He had descendants who were kings. Are you going to claim that this verse is figurative while the others were literal?
Then you have the problem with miscarriages. Wikipedia says that as many as 25% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage. That means that over the past 6,000 years, there could be 10 billion babies in heaven who were never born. (not counting their grandchildren!)
Possible? Yes, but how likely is it?
Greywolf82 2 years ago
Hebrews 7:9-10 says that Levi paid tithes while he was in the "loins of Abraham". So are you going to contend that every little sperm I have had in my life is a person? What about the 1,000s of sperm that didn't make it when my three children were born?
Levi wasn't even Abraham's son. He was his grandson. Are you going to claim that I have my grandchildren "in my loins"?
That is what the verse says. I don't know any serious pro-life people who claim that all semen is human life.
Do you?
Greywolf82 2 years ago
Dude, bitter much?
I disagree with Ruckman's position but your video is a waste of time and a horrible counter point to what he claims. How many times did you ask for him to provide you scripture for his argument? It is Genesis 2:7. Do you have that verse in your Bible? Do you have an answer for that verse? That contradicts what you said. Explain it.
His three marriages? What does that have to do with abortion? You claim he throws up red herrings and then you write that!
Greywolf82 2 years ago
Ruckman is a heretic
christissovereign 2 years ago
In addition to this, think of the sin he commits against the American people. Sooner or later the muslims are going to hear of his teachings and falsely equate it with Christian belief, thus validating in thier own minds another excuse, (like the Philistines in regards Israel), for the attack of America. It is time for all American Christians to oppose this aborent practice. To sacrifice a child of God in his own house, (womb), is an abomination beyond words...
KiwiGraceboy 3 years ago
In order to be a child of God, one must be born again into His family. A child in the womb is a creation of God, not a child of God. Today, since the fall man is created in the image of Adam. I in no way support abortion. I believe it is murder. I also believe what the Bible says is true and to accuse someone using the wrong argument is just as much an abomination. Judge righteous judgment.
kjv3n1 3 years ago
What Ruckman preaches is heresy and supports murder. There is no way to spin this fact. The bible commands us to call these heretics out by name. I am simply doing what the Bible tells me to do.
Where do the babies in the womb end up? Heaven or Hell? Clearly God sees them as children.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
Correction:
Where do the babies murdered in the womb end up? Heaven or Hell? Clearly God sees them as children.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
"Babies" are not "murdered in the womb" as the definition of "Baby" refers to one born. The Bible does not see fetus's as living souls, they are non-existent spiritually and do not go anywhere.
Job 10:19 I should have been as though I had not been; I should have been carried from the womb to the grave.
(cont)
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
There are times when "untimely birth" is preferrable to life:
Ecc 6:3 If a man beget an hundred children, and live many years, so that the days of his years be many, and his soul be not filled with good, and also that he have no burial; I say, that an untimely birth is better than he.
Parental rights were absolute in the Bible, and included capital punishment and religious sacrifice of the child:
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified ..when he had offered Isaac..upon the altar?
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
Jdg 11:31 Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the LORD'S, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering.
Jdg 11:34 And Jephthah came to Mizpeh unto his house, and, behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child; beside her he had neither son nor daughter.
(cont)
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
Comment removed
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
All your Scriptures are taken out of context. A child is innocent:
Proverbs 6:16-17 (NASB)
6:16 There are six things which the Lord hates, Yes, seven which are an abomination to Him:
17 Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, And hands that shed innocent blood,
Dremias5545 2 years ago
Luke 1:44-45 (NASB)
1:44 "For behold, when the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby leaped in my womb for joy.
45 "And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what had been spoken to her by the Lord."
Who was this baby?
Dremias5545 2 years ago
It seems the Bible called this "thing" in the womb a baby.
Romans 3:4 (KJV)
3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
The Bible does not see the fetus as a living soul??? Iv heard about them counterfeit King James Bibles, and even have a few vids in my favorites to highlite what id thought was a ridiculous assertion. But I see from your comment that id better take it more seriously as your copy must be worse than most, id get a new Bible if I was you bro. Yours obviously goes beyond spelling changes and drops whole verses...
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
No actually it doesn't. I know that comes as a surprise to someone who never reads it themselves, but actually even the words used over 700 times, defines life begining with breath at birth. (700 times) That's a little hard to actually honestly just miss.
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
700 times, hmmmm? Interesting, please in all your wisdom why it was that John the Baptist leapt in the womb at the presence of Jesus in the womb of Mary?
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
700 times, hmmmm? Continued... The word birth appears in the KJV 15 times, breath 42 times, life 450 times, beginning 106 times. But as a combination? 0 times... If yours states this 700 times, then I suggest you return your Bible to the shop and ask for your money back, it must be one of those counterfeits. Either that or Dremias's reference to Romans 3:4 most definately applies in your case.
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
Luke 1:11-14 (New American Standard Bible) 11 And an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing to the right of the altar of incense. 12 Zacharias was troubled when he saw the angel, and fear gripped him. 13 But the angel said to him, "Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your petition has been heard, and your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you will give him the name John. 14 "You will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
Luke 1: 15 (Authorised 1769)
15 For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mothers womb.
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
Perhaps RadioFree you would also like to explain: Judges 13:7, 16:7. or Job 3:11 or try Jeremiah 1:5 for size, what about Jeremiah 20:17 or Psa 22:10, 58:3, 71:6, 127:3, or try Ecc 11:5 or Isa 48:8, 49:1... Please explain??? Then the word of the Lord came unto me saying, Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, [and] I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. Jeremiah 1: 4-5 AV 1769.
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
If you use the discipline of Grammatical-Linguistics to actually read the text you will see at no point was "spirit" attributed to the fetus. The English translation says the "Babe leaped for Joy", which makes it sound as if it was the one haivng "The Joy", but it is clear if you look at statement, the "Joy" was Mary's "Joy", and it was Mary, not the fetus, that was "filled with the Spirit". That is a very important distinction showing that the NT writers followed Jewish Halakah.
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
There are two videos which survey the Old and New Testament on my channel which I would encourage you to veiw which address most of what you are referencing. The Bible does not teach life begins at conception, that is why it was a teaching that was condemned as a HERESY. I don't know how many times you have to hear that before it actually sinks in.
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
baby:
1025.βρέφος brephos; a prim. word; an unborn or a newborn child— babies(2), baby(4), childhood(1), infants(1).
Thomas, R. L. (1998, 1981). New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek dictionaries : Updated edition (H8674). Anaheim: Foundation Publications, Inc.
Dremias5545 2 years ago
RadioFree... "It is clear" you say? Well Gods inspired scriptures have something else to say. How can, "and HE shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mothers womb", be referring to Elisabeth? Is she a HE? Do you claim she returned to her own womb to be filled with the Spirit in Luke 1:15? Yours has got to be one of the worst scripture twisting examples iv seen, in more ways than one... Your twisting it to attempt to condone MURDER! Im sorry you find this so confusing, but you need
Baconhunter1 2 years ago
Comment removed
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
this is crazy! maybe you should watch some abortion videos and then say this again that a fetus is non-existent. crazy nonsense!
BamBamBentley 2 years ago
I would encourage Mr Ruckman to read the book of Ezekiel, it has rather a lot to say about idolatry, it also goes on to speak of child sacrifice and the abominination that it is. Even the Philisitines found this practice of the children of Israel aborent at this time. Dont worship your Bible Mr Ruckman, READ IT... He commits an abomination against the Lord and all mankind when he encourages child sacrifice, and brings the faith into disrepute. Does his Godlessness know no bounds?
KiwiGraceboy 3 years ago
You are a pretty big man challenging Dr. Ruckman on some website. Why don't you go challenge him to his face? Not to mention, read Ezekiel yourself and keep it in context. I do not support abortion whatsoever, but I also don't support accusing someone of something using verses out of context. Abortion today is not birthing your child and then offering it up as a sacrifice to a god such as Molech. While you are reading, take a look at how David treated Saul.
kjv3n1 3 years ago
This preacher might be a looney-bird on all the other things mentioned in your comments, from his understanding of demonology to his rediculous claims about the 1611 KJV, but... it is not the belief that abortion is not murder, that is "heresy", but the opposite. The Anti-abortion doctrine is a false doctrine from the middle-ages which infiltrated the Church of Rome. It is called "Traducianism", and yes, it is actually a "heresy".
RadioFreeJerusalem 3 years ago
For people to call themselves Christians and defend abortion is the most absurd thing that I have ever heard! What if Mary would have decided to abort Jesus? What if Elizabeth would have aborted John the Baptist? What if Paul's mother would've aborted him? The list can go on and on. Abortion is murder. Period. And we know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him according the scriptures.
johnboy19801004 2 years ago
"Defending abortion" is not what I did. I said that the heresy known as TRADUCIANISM is unbiblical. Has been known to be unbiblical for literal thousands of years. Is directly contradicted by hundreds of texts in the BIble... even the very definition of the words themselves "Living","Spirit","Soul". To insert one's political prejudices into the text of the BIble and equate it to God's own word is deception. It is handling the word of God deceitfully, and it it wrong, no matter the cause.
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
PS. On defending abortion... it's not quite as simple as your religious-reich leader has claimed. The Bible grants parental rights to parents, not the state or the government. The parental rights given in the Bible were absolute, even after they were born. You cannot justify legalizing state ownership of fetus's using the Bible, it is an utter and complete lie. Do you think LYING is "Christian"? Do you think then using God's name in vain to do it, is "Christian"?
RadioFreeJerusalem 2 years ago
I didn't know you had a new video. I like it. I think that people can be KJVO without being mean-spirited toward those who aren't. I think the one group can respectfully disagree with the other. From what I've seen, the KJV appears to be the best version, but at the same time, I don't plan to go on to your channel and call you names because you came to a different conclusion. I think some of these KJVO people should take that into consideration. :) I'd give this 5 stars, but ratings are off.
FateEternal 3 years ago
I see you all are far to high in the clouds for you to see us preachers and teachers of the Word here on the ground.
God have mercy on you all if you ever get caught teaching even ONE thing that any of the brethren considers heresy. As for me and my house, we shall serve the Lord and grow in the teachings of brother Ruckman. I have no doubt in my mind that this brother has a crown greater than any of us, laid up in heaven.
voidengineer 3 years ago
So are you saying that you oppose the word of God in the A.V? Beware brother, God will not be mocked, it seems many in the KJVo movement simply ignore the words of the Bible they pertain to uphold and make up their own doctrine as they please... This is NOT a criticism, but a plea to repentance... Why defend a heretic? Does this not tar you with the same brush? Turn away from false teachings and turn towards Jesus for your own sake and that of your family.
KiwiGraceboy 3 years ago
This is a dangerous statement voidengineer because you are placing a false prophet above the Word of the Most High. Seriously you need to consider what you are saying.
The Scriptures prove Ruckman is a false prophet. Come out from under this heretic and follow Jesus.
Don't let the man made myth of KJVOism blind you to the truth about Ruckman.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
The teaching from Ruckman in this video alone should be enough to make all who sat under him pack up and leave. His teachings presented in this video is pure heresy that contradicts the Word of the Most High.
I fear this statement holds true yet again because the same pardon will never be given to a non-KJVO:
"KJVOism pardons a multitude of sins and heresies as long as the offending party is a KJVOist."
Dremias5545 3 years ago
Some of Ruckman's false teachings:
In eternity, THE CHRISTIAN IS IN NEW JERUSALEM; he is in his apartment house that is made out of transparent gold, like clear glass. ... He is called out on trips, and these trips take him to Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, Uranus, etc. transporting couples into gardens placing them down and saying, be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth (The Unknown Bible, p. 592). Peter Ruckman
Dremias5545 3 years ago
I KNOW THEY [DEMONS] HAVE TO BE SMALL. ... theres two little animals that have wings. Ones a fly and the others a mosquito. Know what these things are? Theyre pictures of demons. all commentaries, and all theologians, theyre winged. THE THINGS HAVE WINGS (Ruckman, Demons and Christians, Bible Baptist Bookstore, 1976, side 1).
Dremias5545 3 years ago
The A.V. 1611 reading, here, is superior to any Greek text (Peter Ruckman, The Christians Handbook of Manuscript Evidence, Pensacola Bible Press, 1970, p. 118).
Mistakes in the A.V. 1611 are advanced revelation! (Ruckman, Manuscript Evidence, p. 126).
Dremias5545 3 years ago
A short handbook, such as this, will not permit an exhaustive account of the marvelous undesigned coincidences which have slipped through the A.V. 1611 committees, unawares to them, and which give advanced light, and advanced revelation beyond the investigation of the greatest Bible students 300 year later (Ruckman, Manuscript Evidence, p. 127).
Dremias5545 3 years ago
If you are able to obtain a copy [of Ruckmans proposed new book] you will have, in your hands, a minimum of 200 advanced revelations that came from the inerrant English text, that were completely overlooked (or ignored) by every major Christian scholar since 90 A.D. (Bible Believers Bulletin, Jan. 1994, pp. 2,4).
Dremias5545 3 years ago
The King James test is the last and final statement that God has given to the world, and He has given it in the universal language of the 20th century ... The truth is that GOD SLAMMED THE DOOR OF REVELATION SHUT IN 389 BC AND SLAMMED IT SHUT AGAIN IN 1611 (Peter Ruckman, The Monarch of Books, Pensacola, 1973, p. 9)
Dremias5545 3 years ago
God has ordained on this earth 12 boundaries, with 12 nations, who are destined to leave this earth (transported by angels--Luke 16:22), and populate outer space infinitely and forever, beginning with the 12 constellations that are seen on the earth once every 12 months (The Unknown Bible, p. 588).Peter Ruckman
Dremias5545 3 years ago
This video is pure sensational sophistry.
voidengineer 3 years ago
What I find amazing is how people can follow these types of false prophets. It's amazing that Gail(god and) Riplinger and Sam Gipp are ever so silent about Ruckman's heresies, but then again KJVOism pardons a multitude of sins and heresies as long as the offending party is KJVO.
Birds of a feather flock together...
Dremias5545 3 years ago
You sure talk a lot about other mens sins, without backing a word up with a piece of Scripture. Ruckman has lead more men and women to Christ than you could hope to, and he's trained dozens of Bible believing pastors all over the world. Who are you to judge another mans work in Christ?
Good grief.
voidengineer 3 years ago
False prophet Ruckman uses no Scripture and twist Scripture to support his heresy. Refer to this video for the my Scriptural support debunking this false prophet.
I am commanded to call those out who preach heresy. Refer to the Scriptures listed in this video. Did you even watch this video?
It's amazing how people give Ruckman the pardon just because he is KJVO. The bottom line is you should follow Jesus and not this leper messiah who is a puppet of Satan spreading heresies and lies.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
1 Timothy 3 1:7
1 Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer, he desires a noble task. 2 Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?) 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7 He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
Ruckman fails this req:
1. He is not above reproach. He had 2 divorces therefore he is not the husband of 1 wife.
2. He is not temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable
3. He is violent and not gentle, he is quarrelsome,
4. His concerns are over money therefore he fails "not a lover of money"
5. He is concieted.
Ruckman is clearly in the devil's trap. All you must do is read his beliefs and then look to the Bible. The man preaches heresy.
Dremias5545 3 years ago
voidengineer,
Please tell me where is the Scriptures that supports Ruckman's claim about babies not being humans until they take a breath of life. Where is this in the Bible?
Dremias5545 3 years ago
So you want Scripture? Then try this for size... This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith. Tit 1:13. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Gal 1:9. Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thee camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. Jer 1:5.
KiwiGraceboy 3 years ago
For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy. Luke 1:44. In his recorded sermon Mr Ruckman claims in his own words to be an "old dog". But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. 2 Peter 2:22. In fact I suggest you read 2 Peter 2:12-22. This is what the Lord has to say in the A.V. Clear enough???
KiwiGraceboy 3 years ago