@Iran88Arya Search for the stone carving that shows the victory of Shapur I over the Roman Emperor Valerian, and Philip the Arabian Khosro I (531-579 CE), also known as Anushirvan the Just.
That was a pure european person, Sassanid dynasty ruler of Persian Reich. Who defeated both the non-white greeks, who were racist against white persians and white europeans, exiled the Achaemenid dynasty from Persia, and reinstated the pure white dynasty of Sassanids, into White Supremacist Persia.
@Iran88Arya A lot of Persian rulers have obvious european features, like the white races of East Europe do now.
Usually germanic hazel hair, with valachian-gaul blonde hair, or scythian red hair, or slavic black hair, were common in Persia.
The Persian people were white europeans, that much I agree with. Their babilonian captives, who were enslaved and defeated and their capital of Babilon stolen and made the new capital of the Persian Reich, were the ancestors of Iranians now.
@Iran88Arya The Greeks themselves, when having fought the Persians, were racist against Persians for having pale european skin like the northern european races had. The greeks mocked the white europeans as well as the persians, for being white, and having pale skin and soft european features.
Read this in the war of Xenophon, where greeks mock the persian captives for having "pale effeminate skin" like the european races. So you Iranians were actually a lot like the Greeks. Not the Persians.
@Iran88Arya But the people of Persia were not nordics. They were of other white european races. Some were germanic, but most were eastern europeans. Like thracians, with blonde or red hair, or Amazons with dark hair, or scythians with red hair.
The Persians were an East Germanic group of people. They spoke Gothic, using titles such as "Pers Rex" for their kings of Persia. They conquered Babilon, and babilonians such as the Iranians, were never "Persians".
@Victissive You are a stupid cunt who thinks Iranian and Persian are contradictory statements. You also believe that "Persians" were a white supremacist people.. Why don't you just kill yourself? You would be doing humanity a huge favor.
@Iran88Arya It is entirely possible that Nordic people (who didn't even exist in Scandinavia until the Arian Christian Conquest of North-West Europe, from the realm of Arheimar, where Gaut-Oden originated, west of the Sea of Azov, in Scythian's lands of modern Red Rutenia-Romania-Carpathians) did trade with the Orient, and may have travelled through those lands, of the Persian Empire. Merchants from all parts of Europe, including Varengians of North-East Europe were common then.
0:09, thats absolute bs, no nordic supremacist wants to associate with iranians, and look down upon them as brown middle easterners, it is the iranians themselves disguised as nordic supremacists on stormfront etc. to gain acceptance in the west
anybody who has little bit knowledge inhistoryknows that scythians were a part of IRANIAN aryan tribes, i hate those stupid pan-turks whoclaim even god wasa turk lol
@Fravahar Yes, and light pigmentation in North Europe came porbably from Scythians. Just google scythian mummies and you will see that they looked like Russian nordics. Corded War Culture maybe was created by Scythians.
@powstaniecpolski persians have nothing to do with scythians, scythians came to afghanistan, and some went to the indian region of punjab, tht is why pakhtuns look more nordic than iranians
@Fravahar Scythians were invaded by foreign Sarmatians, who are Iranians or Alanic people (The Alani who even invaded Gaul, and are depicted in 900's as tributaries to Otto, with olive skin and black hair).
The Sarmatians were not europeans, they had dark skin and hair. But the Scythians are europeans, with red hair and blue eyes. Who conquered Scandinavia, and settled in Norway and Ireland mostly.
@Fravahar This has nothing to do with turks or turkism. Sarmatians were Iranic tribe. They were not white europeans, like the Scythians.
The Scythians were related to the Gelones and Agatyrsos, two other european white races. These three were descended from Iovan Iorgovan, or Herakles, who had three children with Echidna, the snake queen of Scythia, north of the Danube. Scythos, the elder son who completed Herakle's task, was chosen as the first king of the Scythians.
And because Scythians has some R1b gene marker it doesnt mean that they spoke so called indo-european language. The feature of stepp people is that more or less mix of oriantals and caucasoids where some group rather look caucasoid, some conatins more asians. Ancient hungarians belonged to this culture, and mostly contained caucasoid blood with 20-30 asian blood, but we speak compeletely totally 100%-not european type languages. So because of a little R1b blood they could speak even hungarian :)
Plus someone calims that Scythians are indo-europeans (again!). As I told bacause they have R1b it cant be base of europeans to calim their glory to theirself. In spite of that, they developed their cuture independently from europe. And because if some group built some great culture it is never entirely of their desert alone it is partly based on previous and/or other cultures. Scythians and other stepp people built cuture in symbiosis with asian cultures. SO DONT USE IT FOR YOUR WHITE PRIDE!
So after this what can be the conclusion???? I will be honest, I wont try to be clever because I read few studies, but one thing is sure the even the Indo-european linguistic grouping is a nonsense, not mentioning the ethnical connections.
It is clear that languages resereve similarities from more ancient times than we thought, plus languages had more interaction which makes it impossible to trace ethnical connections based on linguistic.
But I read that japanese has connections with greek, other european languages, utalic, altaic, etc.
NOW 2 OF THE ACES COMES HERE. 5000 year old Sumerian is most similar to turkic or uralic languages and every european language has base word coming from it or some same source.
SANSCRIT which is claimed for Indo-europeans (bullshit again !) has more similar system e.g. to Hungarian than any other eouropean laguages PLUS there are numerous similar base word too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It developed and didnt changed basically by mixing wiht other groups befor we came (back) to europe. But suprisingly we can find similar base word in most of the european laguages. It also has significant system and base word similary with uralic languages, turkic languages, monoglian language, or the ancient etruscian and sumir languages (I read studies about this with plenty exaples, so it is really true). With japanese hungarian also has connection.
And one more thing to destroy the fake Indo-european term for claiming untruly others glory....
If you give up the the Indo-european language grouping and first examine the languages and lots of languages from different groups and times, it will turn out that this grouping is a bullshit.
Lets see my language, Hungarian. It is definitely different from any european laguages. Its base words resulted widespread related secondary base word, which proves that has been developing for long time.
Maybe R1b DNA marker related groups migrated to Asia or towards east, but it was very long time ago their history at that point separated from the rest of the caucasoid group. Those people founder of persian or other stepp (or turanid) cultures and they built those cutures with the interaction of other asian people. A neigbouring asian can calm much more form that than a european :)
@TheKourosh1990 Actually waste your energy, and search how Scythians are only described as having reddish hair and blue eyes. They later migrated into West and North Europe during the hunnic invasions, from the Reich of Arheimar, or Kingdom of Oium "Aujum", from norse mythologies.
They even created the north west germanic languages, who only appeared there, from east germanic languages. Scythians who spoke Crimean Gothic, which is also the core dialect of slavic originally.
@TheKourosh1990 Just like the "Hindu tribes of Barbarians" were seeking to invade Europe for 3 millenia BC, and the Amazons stopped you and conquered you.
Then this allowed the migration of germanic tribes of Europeans into the Amazon conquered lands, where the Hindus were pushed back into your deserts from.
@TheKourosh1990 What is there to steal, thief? Persians were all white people. I doubt they were blondes or "nordic" since those people weren't even in Scandinavia yet, in those times.
The Greeks and Iranians are much alike. You were both non-white, and hated the White Persians, and white europeans. You were racist against us, persians, for our pale skin.
That's why persians needed heavy clothing and armour, to protect our pale skins in harsh desert heat and sand.
@TheKourosh1990 Read the description of Xenophon of the white Persians, where the tanned greeks (just like your olive yellow skins now) mocked the persians for having soft white "effeminate skin", like europeans.
that proves persians were white people. Unlike you arabs who were just as mud skinned as the Greek savages (exception Acheans and Spartans who are described as using incest to preserve their blonde hair and blue eyes, or central european features).
@TheKourosh1990 Remember that you as Arabs or Sarmatians / Alans / Iranians, inherit only Islam. Just like the Turks inherit Mozaism-Jewishness.
Also us white europeans, inherit the Christianity, which is the cult of Ahura Mazda, foreseen by Zoroaster, a White Supremacist who worshipped the Light. And foretold that Jesus-Ahura Mazda will appear as the Spirit of Light, in a white european host.
I read this in a Nazi book, of German occultism. Hitler knew this too.
@TheKourosh1990 Also notice how some Greek-roman writer "Ammines" whateverus, I forgot the name, described the First Persians are loyal to their first emperor. And to that day they called themselves children of the Moon and Sun.
This tradition of "moon and sun cult" is kept in White Europe, and is found even on the cover of a book I have, with ancient and medieval traditions of folklore in my country. Which is just at the north-east borders of the Persian Empire.
@TheKourosh1990 First Paragraph of Scythians? How could you know what language they spoke? You never heard them.
The scythians, spoke Gothic. You imbecile. Which wasn't a written language until Wulfilla created the Gothic script in 3-4 th centuries BC, or something like that. Which was used to write the Gothic Bible (which is now in England for some stupid reason).
Read: "Codex Argenteus". Gothic Bible of Wulfila. This was inspired from Crimean Gothic, the original Scythian.
@TheKourosh1990 And the Scythians like the Boudini tribe, with blue eyes and red hair, pale skin obviously, are just like Europeans now, who are their descendents.
Not all do, only some, of course. Even some iranians got a bit of reddish hair, from being raped by Scythian nomads from Europe so often. Bahahahahahhaa
@TheKourosh1990 What's next, you want to steal my country's culture as well? And say that I am atlantic or new worlder person, while you "Were always at least 5 times more european and white" than me?
Hahahah you're a pathetic invader. Go play with your fermented camel piss, dear donkey.
You are the spawn of Ishmael. Child of Ibrahim and Hagar. A jewish sumerian and a dark skinned ethiopian - egyptian girl are your true relatives and ancestors.
....you would come to the conclusion that the 2 nation evolved from one ancient group, or one is ancestor of the other, but in reality gnetically or ethnically they dont have to much connection, the story was quite different. So by language similarity we cant make any historical conclusion without strong historical written or archeological evidences !!!!!!
So this is european white pridist can claim the persian or stepp cutures as the pride of white race and by this for their own.
But in fact the languages mostly changes because ethnic groups mix with others or ruled nations take the languages of their rulers but because they mind is more influenced by their original language they are unable to learn and pronounce the new languege so they will speak it differently and with more or less different grammar. If you were a scientist in the far future when today nations would exist and compare the french and ancient latin laguage without historical documents....
Yeah it is ridiculous as some White Pride follower try to expand the glory of caucasoid race under the term of Indo-european or indo-iranian. The thing is that indo-european is just a linguistic term defining a group of languages which are related. But actually even this grouping is based on a untrue theory such as the languages develop from a mutual ancestor language as the fragments of an ancent ethinc group become separated....
There might have been Nordic looking persians with blond hair and blue eyes, but they were never a majority. Iranians/Persians have their own feaures, the eyebrows, nose, facial structure etc... If we're related to any Europans at all, it's to the latins and the mediteranian (sorry for spelling) people of Europe. Just take a look at Cyrus the great, Darius, Shapour, Babak khoramdin or any ancient Persian statue and you'll see the typical Iranian feature.
all thosew ho claime true iranian-aryans were blond !!, they should just look on thef ace of IRANIAN ZOROASTRIANS, thel ast remain of pre-islmic times who truley never mixed themself with no ethnical or religious group because of their religious tradition, all of them have BLACK HAIR and BROWN eyes
know i understand but to be fair the kurds and turks mess things up for you because both groups think that you guys are the prove that they also can be accepted like Europeans i know understand that aryans where not Europeans
but middle eastern i am proud of you that you guys tell the trued and not believe the indo European bullshit that kurds believe
Look up "Greek depiction of Persians" . Iranians have had some non-caucasoid admixture, but it's greatly been exagerrated. The Mongoloid component is 3% HG C3 and O), Arabid Component 15% (HG J1), And In the south, there is an Indic component of 2.5% (largely South West). The Northern half of the country Carries higher R Haplogroup frequencies. Most Southern Iranians, (with the exclusion of Bahktiari's, and those towards the center of Iran), are genetic outliers. Balochis are highly mixed.
very fine clip, excatly, i never understand why those euro-centrics try to make true aryans BLOND or with blue eye, then original aryans were with black hair and brown eyes, you have to look on theface od old iranian zoroastrians, i never understood why some idiots try to fake history
What the hell does arthur kemp has to do with Zionism exactly?
Im sick of the word "Zionists" being used as a scapegoat on anybody people don't like
on NWO,on Communists,on Nazis,on americans,on Racists,on Christians,used by all sides the word thrown everywhere without a relation to it's real meaning and ideology,and this is something that really pisses me off
dam white people stole iranisn history like they stole black history omg they are so racist
345SAT 3 weeks ago
@Iran88Arya Search for the stone carving that shows the victory of Shapur I over the Roman Emperor Valerian, and Philip the Arabian Khosro I (531-579 CE), also known as Anushirvan the Just.
That was a pure european person, Sassanid dynasty ruler of Persian Reich. Who defeated both the non-white greeks, who were racist against white persians and white europeans, exiled the Achaemenid dynasty from Persia, and reinstated the pure white dynasty of Sassanids, into White Supremacist Persia.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Iran88Arya A lot of Persian rulers have obvious european features, like the white races of East Europe do now.
Usually germanic hazel hair, with valachian-gaul blonde hair, or scythian red hair, or slavic black hair, were common in Persia.
The Persian people were white europeans, that much I agree with. Their babilonian captives, who were enslaved and defeated and their capital of Babilon stolen and made the new capital of the Persian Reich, were the ancestors of Iranians now.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Victissive
where are you cming from? Persians are European not Iranian? how much stupid a person can be to claim that wooow
TheKourosh1990 4 weeks ago
@Iran88Arya The Greeks themselves, when having fought the Persians, were racist against Persians for having pale european skin like the northern european races had. The greeks mocked the white europeans as well as the persians, for being white, and having pale skin and soft european features.
Read this in the war of Xenophon, where greeks mock the persian captives for having "pale effeminate skin" like the european races. So you Iranians were actually a lot like the Greeks. Not the Persians.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Iran88Arya But the people of Persia were not nordics. They were of other white european races. Some were germanic, but most were eastern europeans. Like thracians, with blonde or red hair, or Amazons with dark hair, or scythians with red hair.
The Persians were an East Germanic group of people. They spoke Gothic, using titles such as "Pers Rex" for their kings of Persia. They conquered Babilon, and babilonians such as the Iranians, were never "Persians".
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Victissive
you are right thats why Iraninas have had massive influence on Germanic or East Europe or Balkan realms languages.
TheKourosh1990 4 weeks ago
@Victissive stop posting your bullshit pseudoscience. "Babylonians" are the Iranians today. OH BROTHER, what bullshit
Xerxes89 3 weeks ago
@Xerxes89 Why don't you historically insert yourself into an oven, Jew.
Victissive 3 weeks ago
@Victissive You are a stupid cunt who thinks Iranian and Persian are contradictory statements. You also believe that "Persians" were a white supremacist people.. Why don't you just kill yourself? You would be doing humanity a huge favor.
Xerxes89 3 weeks ago
@Iran88Arya It is entirely possible that Nordic people (who didn't even exist in Scandinavia until the Arian Christian Conquest of North-West Europe, from the realm of Arheimar, where Gaut-Oden originated, west of the Sea of Azov, in Scythian's lands of modern Red Rutenia-Romania-Carpathians) did trade with the Orient, and may have travelled through those lands, of the Persian Empire. Merchants from all parts of Europe, including Varengians of North-East Europe were common then.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Victissive
Actually Scythians traveled from east of Iran all the way to east of Europe where is today Bulgaria, Croatia and Hungry ..
make your mind
SCYTHIANS = INDO IRANIAN
TheKourosh1990 4 weeks ago
0:09, thats absolute bs, no nordic supremacist wants to associate with iranians, and look down upon them as brown middle easterners, it is the iranians themselves disguised as nordic supremacists on stormfront etc. to gain acceptance in the west
SayedMMustafa 1 month ago
@SayedMMustafa You're saying iranians and other semites would pretend to be nordicist, on stormfront? ?!
Hmm, can you elaborate?
Victissive 4 weeks ago
fuck off eurocentrics!!
8rdf 1 month ago
So do modern day iranians (persians) have any relation to the nordic people (norway, sweden etc) at all?
EpicMind 1 month ago
I just want to add that Europeans have similar look and light pigmentation could be widespreaded by Scythians.
powstaniecpolski 4 months ago
anybody who has little bit knowledge inhistoryknows that scythians were a part of IRANIAN aryan tribes, i hate those stupid pan-turks whoclaim even god wasa turk lol
Fravahar 8 months ago 3
@Fravahar Yes, and light pigmentation in North Europe came porbably from Scythians. Just google scythian mummies and you will see that they looked like Russian nordics. Corded War Culture maybe was created by Scythians.
powstaniecpolski 4 months ago
@powstaniecpolski persians have nothing to do with scythians, scythians came to afghanistan, and some went to the indian region of punjab, tht is why pakhtuns look more nordic than iranians
SayedMMustafa 2 months ago
@SayedMMustafa Some Pashtunes look Euro though to most likely mixing with Greek invaders. Schytians were Iranic, so are Pashtuns actually.
persiandudeee 1 month ago
@Fravahar Scythians were invaded by foreign Sarmatians, who are Iranians or Alanic people (The Alani who even invaded Gaul, and are depicted in 900's as tributaries to Otto, with olive skin and black hair).
The Sarmatians were not europeans, they had dark skin and hair. But the Scythians are europeans, with red hair and blue eyes. Who conquered Scandinavia, and settled in Norway and Ireland mostly.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Fravahar This has nothing to do with turks or turkism. Sarmatians were Iranic tribe. They were not white europeans, like the Scythians.
The Scythians were related to the Gelones and Agatyrsos, two other european white races. These three were descended from Iovan Iorgovan, or Herakles, who had three children with Echidna, the snake queen of Scythia, north of the Danube. Scythos, the elder son who completed Herakle's task, was chosen as the first king of the Scythians.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
And because Scythians has some R1b gene marker it doesnt mean that they spoke so called indo-european language. The feature of stepp people is that more or less mix of oriantals and caucasoids where some group rather look caucasoid, some conatins more asians. Ancient hungarians belonged to this culture, and mostly contained caucasoid blood with 20-30 asian blood, but we speak compeletely totally 100%-not european type languages. So because of a little R1b blood they could speak even hungarian :)
asianhordes 9 months ago
Plus someone calims that Scythians are indo-europeans (again!). As I told bacause they have R1b it cant be base of europeans to calim their glory to theirself. In spite of that, they developed their cuture independently from europe. And because if some group built some great culture it is never entirely of their desert alone it is partly based on previous and/or other cultures. Scythians and other stepp people built cuture in symbiosis with asian cultures. SO DONT USE IT FOR YOUR WHITE PRIDE!
asianhordes 9 months ago
So after this what can be the conclusion???? I will be honest, I wont try to be clever because I read few studies, but one thing is sure the even the Indo-european linguistic grouping is a nonsense, not mentioning the ethnical connections.
It is clear that languages resereve similarities from more ancient times than we thought, plus languages had more interaction which makes it impossible to trace ethnical connections based on linguistic.
asianhordes 9 months ago
But I read that japanese has connections with greek, other european languages, utalic, altaic, etc.
NOW 2 OF THE ACES COMES HERE. 5000 year old Sumerian is most similar to turkic or uralic languages and every european language has base word coming from it or some same source.
SANSCRIT which is claimed for Indo-europeans (bullshit again !) has more similar system e.g. to Hungarian than any other eouropean laguages PLUS there are numerous similar base word too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
asianhordes 9 months ago
It developed and didnt changed basically by mixing wiht other groups befor we came (back) to europe. But suprisingly we can find similar base word in most of the european laguages. It also has significant system and base word similary with uralic languages, turkic languages, monoglian language, or the ancient etruscian and sumir languages (I read studies about this with plenty exaples, so it is really true). With japanese hungarian also has connection.
asianhordes 9 months ago
And one more thing to destroy the fake Indo-european term for claiming untruly others glory....
If you give up the the Indo-european language grouping and first examine the languages and lots of languages from different groups and times, it will turn out that this grouping is a bullshit.
Lets see my language, Hungarian. It is definitely different from any european laguages. Its base words resulted widespread related secondary base word, which proves that has been developing for long time.
asianhordes 9 months ago
Maybe R1b DNA marker related groups migrated to Asia or towards east, but it was very long time ago their history at that point separated from the rest of the caucasoid group. Those people founder of persian or other stepp (or turanid) cultures and they built those cutures with the interaction of other asian people. A neigbouring asian can calm much more form that than a european :)
asianhordes 9 months ago
@asianhordes
Scythians were origin Iranian people, so don't waste your energy and write nonsense!
TheKourosh1990 9 months ago 6
@TheKourosh1990 You are insane. Scythians were pale people with reddish hair and blue eyes. See "Boudini tribe of Scythians" north of the Black Sea.
Now, kindly go fuck yourself, Gypsy whore.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@TheKourosh1990 Actually waste your energy, and search how Scythians are only described as having reddish hair and blue eyes. They later migrated into West and North Europe during the hunnic invasions, from the Reich of Arheimar, or Kingdom of Oium "Aujum", from norse mythologies.
They even created the north west germanic languages, who only appeared there, from east germanic languages. Scythians who spoke Crimean Gothic, which is also the core dialect of slavic originally.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
@Victissive
Scythians are Indo Iranians , i responded you in simple words. now stop stealing be proud of your own history
SCYTHIANS ARE INDO-IRANIANS like Persians ,Medians, Parthians and Sassanians
do not waste your enery nobody cares about your nonsesne pathetic self made history. open the wikipedia and read the first paragraph of scythians
TheKourosh1990 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 Indo-Iranians? Remember that the first usage of these terms had very different shapes to them.
First it was Hindu-ARyans. Hindu means the non-white asians, and Aryans the European Whites.
then Indo- Aryan, or Asia-Europe, became Aryan-Hindu, inverted. Then Aryan became "Germanic", and Hindu- just "Indo".
So Aryan becomes "Germanic" then "European". Hindu Barbarian became "Indo".
So you changed the direction, and then the colours as well.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 Just like the "Hindu tribes of Barbarians" were seeking to invade Europe for 3 millenia BC, and the Amazons stopped you and conquered you.
Then this allowed the migration of germanic tribes of Europeans into the Amazon conquered lands, where the Hindus were pushed back into your deserts from.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 What is there to steal, thief? Persians were all white people. I doubt they were blondes or "nordic" since those people weren't even in Scandinavia yet, in those times.
The Greeks and Iranians are much alike. You were both non-white, and hated the White Persians, and white europeans. You were racist against us, persians, for our pale skin.
That's why persians needed heavy clothing and armour, to protect our pale skins in harsh desert heat and sand.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 Read the description of Xenophon of the white Persians, where the tanned greeks (just like your olive yellow skins now) mocked the persians for having soft white "effeminate skin", like europeans.
that proves persians were white people. Unlike you arabs who were just as mud skinned as the Greek savages (exception Acheans and Spartans who are described as using incest to preserve their blonde hair and blue eyes, or central european features).
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 You're just angry, because history shows how you muskins gorillas invaded the White Persian empire, and were seen as savages by us.
And that White Europe has a much greater history there, than any of you coloures do.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 Remember that you as Arabs or Sarmatians / Alans / Iranians, inherit only Islam. Just like the Turks inherit Mozaism-Jewishness.
Also us white europeans, inherit the Christianity, which is the cult of Ahura Mazda, foreseen by Zoroaster, a White Supremacist who worshipped the Light. And foretold that Jesus-Ahura Mazda will appear as the Spirit of Light, in a white european host.
I read this in a Nazi book, of German occultism. Hitler knew this too.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 Also notice how some Greek-roman writer "Ammines" whateverus, I forgot the name, described the First Persians are loyal to their first emperor. And to that day they called themselves children of the Moon and Sun.
This tradition of "moon and sun cult" is kept in White Europe, and is found even on the cover of a book I have, with ancient and medieval traditions of folklore in my country. Which is just at the north-east borders of the Persian Empire.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 First Paragraph of Scythians? How could you know what language they spoke? You never heard them.
The scythians, spoke Gothic. You imbecile. Which wasn't a written language until Wulfilla created the Gothic script in 3-4 th centuries BC, or something like that. Which was used to write the Gothic Bible (which is now in England for some stupid reason).
Read: "Codex Argenteus". Gothic Bible of Wulfila. This was inspired from Crimean Gothic, the original Scythian.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 And the Scythians like the Boudini tribe, with blue eyes and red hair, pale skin obviously, are just like Europeans now, who are their descendents.
Not all do, only some, of course. Even some iranians got a bit of reddish hair, from being raped by Scythian nomads from Europe so often. Bahahahahahhaa
Victissive 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheKourosh1990 What's next, you want to steal my country's culture as well? And say that I am atlantic or new worlder person, while you "Were always at least 5 times more european and white" than me?
Hahahah you're a pathetic invader. Go play with your fermented camel piss, dear donkey.
You are the spawn of Ishmael. Child of Ibrahim and Hagar. A jewish sumerian and a dark skinned ethiopian - egyptian girl are your true relatives and ancestors.
Victissive 4 weeks ago
....you would come to the conclusion that the 2 nation evolved from one ancient group, or one is ancestor of the other, but in reality gnetically or ethnically they dont have to much connection, the story was quite different. So by language similarity we cant make any historical conclusion without strong historical written or archeological evidences !!!!!!
So this is european white pridist can claim the persian or stepp cutures as the pride of white race and by this for their own.
asianhordes 9 months ago
But in fact the languages mostly changes because ethnic groups mix with others or ruled nations take the languages of their rulers but because they mind is more influenced by their original language they are unable to learn and pronounce the new languege so they will speak it differently and with more or less different grammar. If you were a scientist in the far future when today nations would exist and compare the french and ancient latin laguage without historical documents....
asianhordes 9 months ago
Yeah it is ridiculous as some White Pride follower try to expand the glory of caucasoid race under the term of Indo-european or indo-iranian. The thing is that indo-european is just a linguistic term defining a group of languages which are related. But actually even this grouping is based on a untrue theory such as the languages develop from a mutual ancestor language as the fragments of an ancent ethinc group become separated....
asianhordes 9 months ago
Btw, i'm myself as nationalistic asyou can get, but Persian/Iranian nationalism DOESN'T = Nazism. Get that through your head people.
persiandudeee 10 months ago
There might have been Nordic looking persians with blond hair and blue eyes, but they were never a majority. Iranians/Persians have their own feaures, the eyebrows, nose, facial structure etc... If we're related to any Europans at all, it's to the latins and the mediteranian (sorry for spelling) people of Europe. Just take a look at Cyrus the great, Darius, Shapour, Babak khoramdin or any ancient Persian statue and you'll see the typical Iranian feature.
persiandudeee 10 months ago
all thosew ho claime true iranian-aryans were blond !!, they should just look on thef ace of IRANIAN ZOROASTRIANS, thel ast remain of pre-islmic times who truley never mixed themself with no ethnical or religious group because of their religious tradition, all of them have BLACK HAIR and BROWN eyes
Fravahar 11 months ago
@Fravahar Most Zoroaterians, even the Iranian one's are heavily mixed with Indians.
Fuck eurocentrism though. We were never Nordic looking.
persiandudeee 1 month ago
know i understand but to be fair the kurds and turks mess things up for you because both groups think that you guys are the prove that they also can be accepted like Europeans i know understand that aryans where not Europeans
but middle eastern i am proud of you that you guys tell the trued and not believe the indo European bullshit that kurds believe
ezzo9009 1 year ago
@ezzo9009 aryans were the indo-iranians of the indo-european branch you moron
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
@ezzo9009 indo-european means from india to europe
european is a different thing
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
Hitler was a shame for Aryans
What he did was against the basic Aryan social laws
Fazi19867 1 year ago
Look up "Greek depiction of Persians" . Iranians have had some non-caucasoid admixture, but it's greatly been exagerrated. The Mongoloid component is 3% HG C3 and O), Arabid Component 15% (HG J1), And In the south, there is an Indic component of 2.5% (largely South West). The Northern half of the country Carries higher R Haplogroup frequencies. Most Southern Iranians, (with the exclusion of Bahktiari's, and those towards the center of Iran), are genetic outliers. Balochis are highly mixed.
zadeh79 1 year ago
I CANT UNDERSTAND WHY THE IRANI ALLWAYS TALK ABOUT "RACE, ARYAN , RACE ARYAN RACE ARYAN RACE ARYAN" ?
EVEN A GERMAN TALK SO MUCH ABOUT OF HITLER A IRANI DO .
I REALLY DONT UNDERSTAND WHY YOU ALL IRANI ARE SO FASCINETED OF "ARYAN , WHITE , BLOND , BLUE , HITLER"
IRANI ARE NOT BROTHERS WITH GERMANS , IRANI ARE BROTHERS WITH AFGHANI , KURDI , TADJIKI , PAKISTANI , HINDUSTANI .
HALILYILMAZ2010 1 year ago
@HALILYILMAZ2010 slant-eye read about the history of aryans
retard
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
@HALILYILMAZ2010 this video explains that iranians were not blonde you hooked-nosed slant-eye
this video doesn´t say that iranian peoples like kurds and persians are brothers with germany
hooked-nosed slant-eye to be honest kurds are closer to germans then you cause of both of them being indo-european
but i hate white wannabes like you hooked-nose slant-eye
fuckturks2223 1 year ago
very fine clip, excatly, i never understand why those euro-centrics try to make true aryans BLOND or with blue eye, then original aryans were with black hair and brown eyes, you have to look on theface od old iranian zoroastrians, i never understood why some idiots try to fake history
Fravahar 1 year ago
IRAN!!!!!!!
dancedanceterminator 1 year ago
What the hell does arthur kemp has to do with Zionism exactly?
Im sick of the word "Zionists" being used as a scapegoat on anybody people don't like
on NWO,on Communists,on Nazis,on americans,on Racists,on Christians,used by all sides the word thrown everywhere without a relation to it's real meaning and ideology,and this is something that really pisses me off
HebrewFatherland 1 year ago