So it films at 1000fps. but is the video quality always this poor? I'm thinking about getting one to film my bowling release but if the quality is this bad i dont know if i want to.
@ScubzMcTalBowling quality isn't great at 1000fps and the resolution is too slow. for a bowling release i bet you can use something like 200fps and be fine, which means higher quality
I'm not sure what "full light" is but it wasn't enough light. 1000fps is relagated to direct sunlight (high lumens) and it should look better. I have a rough time getting my Casio to shoot well at 1200 fps.
yup. you can check out the casio ex-f1, but if you want better than that you'll need a professional solution. we have to keep in mind how affordable these cameras are and how challenging hi-speed shooting is.
this looks sooo crappy! :( thanks so much man, I wanted to buy this camera for its slow motion features.... u GREAT! :-P keep posting....
SeeyaahOfficial 1 year ago
So it films at 1000fps. but is the video quality always this poor? I'm thinking about getting one to film my bowling release but if the quality is this bad i dont know if i want to.
ScubzMcTalBowling 1 year ago
@ScubzMcTalBowling quality isn't great at 1000fps and the resolution is too slow. for a bowling release i bet you can use something like 200fps and be fine, which means higher quality
wwwgeekdotcom 1 year ago
for its price, this camera is excellent!
xato909 1 year ago
When recording at 1000fps its normal that the quality is crappy.If it wasnt the video file would be HUGE.
iharted 1 year ago
holy crap this is the music from the classic NES game 'river city ransom'.... wow that game was amazing- i didn't think anybody else knew of it
robojuan 2 years ago 2
I'm not sure what "full light" is but it wasn't enough light. 1000fps is relagated to direct sunlight (high lumens) and it should look better. I have a rough time getting my Casio to shoot well at 1200 fps.
taofledermaus 2 years ago
It's very nice, but I think that 210 and 420 would be magnitudes more useful.
OrangeD00D 2 years ago
the quality is bad because he didnt put enought light, you need sun light or better to get good videos
animes25 2 years ago
1000fps looks bad no matter what. I had a direct light on this. Anyway, yes, sunlight helps.
wwwgeekdotcom 2 years ago
couldnt you put a lense on that makes the picture better?
qacermacer 2 years ago
no, more light would help, but not a lot can be done at 1000fps with this camera.
wwwgeekdotcom 2 years ago
its cool but the quality sucks but i still give u 5/5
JakeCanRead 2 years ago
Wow... I didn't know the image quality at 1000fps would be so crappy for this camera... :S
SpookMTY 2 years ago 2
yup. you can check out the casio ex-f1, but if you want better than that you'll need a professional solution. we have to keep in mind how affordable these cameras are and how challenging hi-speed shooting is.
wwwgeekdotcom 2 years ago
At least is seems to be doing quite well at 210 and 420fps ;) Not HD, but like you say, it's pretty neat for a camera in this price range ;)
SpookMTY 2 years ago
actual resolution = 224x64
wwwgeekdotcom 2 years ago