Laws of universe are very precise; there is perfect organization throughout in the universe. You think that fundamentals particles are joke and the way those probabilities collapse in to fixed reality for us is just a coincident. Do you really think with human limitations, you will be able to differentiate nature from God or to fully understand these mechanisms? NO.
This is actually VanInwagen's Wider Design Argument, which, actually, I am quite sympathetic towards. But there are a lot of objections to this reasoning; you should read up on it and make yourself familiar with the objections. This doesn't preculde Draper being an intelligent academic; people who disagree with us can be intellectually admirable as well.
@jpkushin i was actually quite surprised by Dr. Paul drapers performance in that debate. He did resonably well considering that he is not a seasoned oral debator like Dr. Craig.
ALL Irreducible Complexity defenses trail off to the same superficial metaphysical nexus.The Human Mind's natural tendency to contemplate "origin" on a par with "existence" obstacles lucidity on the physical Universe's mechanisms.
Kudos for not oversimplifying the design arguments or for dismissing design out of hand!
MorganMarvinson 8 months ago
"intelligent designer" - this loaded with monotheistic bias.
TurboDally 11 months ago
Man, these videos are so dry. They look like they were recorded for WGBH Boston in 1982. That's not a bad thing, though. I still like them.
ChalkiePerfect 1 year ago
Ooops, wrong Paul Draper.
K33f4 2 years ago
Draper was my teacher many moons ago. He is indeed intellectually honest and one of the finest academics I know.
balvarez01 3 years ago 3
Laws of universe are very precise; there is perfect organization throughout in the universe. You think that fundamentals particles are joke and the way those probabilities collapse in to fixed reality for us is just a coincident. Do you really think with human limitations, you will be able to differentiate nature from God or to fully understand these mechanisms? NO.
testchandra 2 years ago
This is actually VanInwagen's Wider Design Argument, which, actually, I am quite sympathetic towards. But there are a lot of objections to this reasoning; you should read up on it and make yourself familiar with the objections. This doesn't preculde Draper being an intelligent academic; people who disagree with us can be intellectually admirable as well.
balvarez01 2 years ago
@testchandra
Same can be applied to god(s) plural :)
"Laws of universe are very precise; there is perfect organization throughout in the universe."
That all seems subjective, you see "perfect" organisation, I do not.
TurboDally 11 months ago
@testchandra "I believe in God, only I spell it Nature" Frank Lloyd Wright
wiscokiddd 1 month ago
Fuck me Pauls aged! Mansun'l never have him back now
spencranor 3 years ago
Draper is intellectually honest. He had a fine showing against William Lane Craig in a debate about a decade ago.
jpkushin 3 years ago 9
@jpkushin i was actually quite surprised by Dr. Paul drapers performance in that debate. He did resonably well considering that he is not a seasoned oral debator like Dr. Craig.
Dathinkingman 1 year ago
ALL Irreducible Complexity defenses trail off to the same superficial metaphysical nexus.The Human Mind's natural tendency to contemplate "origin" on a par with "existence" obstacles lucidity on the physical Universe's mechanisms.
djnross 3 years ago 3
So far, all interviews from the conference seem to be worth viewing. Thanks!
thefritz123 4 years ago 5