How about the fallacy that you cannot prove something is impossible? In general, you can't. But sometimes you can. If the definition of a concept or thing leads to self-contradiction, that concept or thing is impossible.
You cannot find two integers whose ratio is the square root of two. You cannot draw a square triangle.
Oh and the phrase "you can never say that something is impossible" can be reworded as "it is impossible to say that something is impossible" - paradox.
the first beer? hey i wonder what happens when this firments? it does so you have identified what it does what makes it better if its done over here or over there?
right and because it is a dice you roll it...because it is a machine you advance it if the die needs a proper table or surface it becomes itself... to use a die is to have a relationship with the die what it needs is felt. what the board needs is a dice.
Hehe. Yes, die is singular, dice is plural. And the comment that it "should have taken" a certain number of rolls is actually a reformulation of the gambler's fallacy. ;) Apart from that, good video. Most creationists don't understand that a selection mechanism completely changes the nature of an otherwise random process, and that's like 50% of the theory of evolution. If you take constructive criticism, I think videos like these benefit a lot from some graphical illustrations.
How about the fallacy that you cannot prove something is impossible? In general, you can't. But sometimes you can. If the definition of a concept or thing leads to self-contradiction, that concept or thing is impossible.
You cannot find two integers whose ratio is the square root of two. You cannot draw a square triangle.
Oh and the phrase "you can never say that something is impossible" can be reworded as "it is impossible to say that something is impossible" - paradox.
bdf2718 3 years ago
the first beer? hey i wonder what happens when this firments? it does so you have identified what it does what makes it better if its done over here or over there?
yikeswood 3 years ago
actually, you have to assume that the die is fairly balanced to have a 1:6 chance!
46,656 isn't astronomically high! :)
Flipping a coin and having it land heads 100 times in a row... not THAT's astronomical! :))
lennyhipp 3 years ago
I love the idea of this "Friday Fallacy". Dont know why nobody thought of it before. Looking forward to the next one already.
lennyhipp 3 years ago
STOUT, lovely
BaKer312213 3 years ago
Yeah, I love beers ALMOST as much as I love wine.
DrixDZanth 3 years ago
You should do the burden of proof fallacy its my favorite
Cojaxod 3 years ago
Sure thing, Cojax.
DrixDZanth 3 years ago
false dilemma fallacy is my favorite:
If not A, then B... assuming there's only two possible scenarios, and disproving one automatically proves the other.
lennyhipp 3 years ago
right and because it is a dice you roll it...because it is a machine you advance it if the die needs a proper table or surface it becomes itself... to use a die is to have a relationship with the die what it needs is felt. what the board needs is a dice.
yikeswood 3 years ago
Hehe. Yes, die is singular, dice is plural. And the comment that it "should have taken" a certain number of rolls is actually a reformulation of the gambler's fallacy. ;) Apart from that, good video. Most creationists don't understand that a selection mechanism completely changes the nature of an otherwise random process, and that's like 50% of the theory of evolution. If you take constructive criticism, I think videos like these benefit a lot from some graphical illustrations.
drdirs 3 years ago