@2942jack But K-21 has fire control system that's good enough to shoot down a chopper in flight. did you see the drone getting shot down with a 3-round burst (air burst btw). The 40mm shell of K-21 can be programmed instantaneously for impact, airburst, timer.
I don't like the way it throws the shell casing high and forward. Hull down or in a lot of smoke you might not see the K-21 until it fires and that shiny brass arcing in the sky advertises "here I am". What happens when you fire from a tunnel or under a bridge. Better to eject low and rearwards.
Now the Chinese have a sample of this. It was seized in Hong Kong coming back from exhibition in Saudi Arabia. Lesson is, never use a Chinese port to ship your weapons back.
@stalkingalizee Maersk shipping screwed up. The sample was shipped on a Maersk cargo ship which made the stop in Hong Kong. The manufacturer of S Korea shares the blame too...
Very nice design. I hope eventually we'll have a chance to incorporate similar into the Brad, expanding upon what was done with the "BUSK Kit". There are plans for a Block 2.0 upgrade, but probably not see that for another 4-5 years.
BTW,...what type of ATGMs is the K-21 using? They look smaller the TOWs, but I could be wrong. Local? Or maybe Spikes?
Does m2 have a 40mm cannon? can m2 cross a river unaided? Can m2 fire airburst round that can hurt enemy hiding behind building? Can m2 fire airburst cannons that can actully shoot down low flying uav and choppers?
i love this ifv i feel the usa should build a new ifv,we had one coming on line but got cut :( but a 40mm gun could be seen as to big for shooting alot 30mm 30/35mm in dp will be more useful. but the 40mm is a killer
True, it started it's career as light tank. But then someone did get "great idea" to make it IFV... that explains why motor is behind the vehicle and not in front like most other IFV's.
Not best solution in IFV when you have to climb over the engine when dismounting.
Import factor of this IFV is their ability of a fuction, the spec seems it has strongest ability among IFV's in the world..Pretty good job. I am just curious if US has participated the project to help South Korean army
I'm pretty sure not much if any help/assistance was provided by US. Someone commented US firms tried to interfere in the development of K200 (previous SK IFV) saying it was a copy of US M113. SK engrs ended having to show schematics to prove it wasn't. SK can design Aegis Destroyer on own. Only US 'help' was buying the components such as AEGIS Radar system...
As such a TINY country, korean cannot defend themselves. Therefore, USA military power must present and command this tiny peninsula. American treat Korean like those in TV MASH. Pitiful Korean.
Well you have to look at all the specs and the function. Note that the BMP-3 doesn't need to deploy pontoons to go into water and has excellent maneuverability. Firepower is probably equaled out because there is so much you can fit into a light armored vehicle, but rapid medium fire support / transport would probably go to the BMP-3. The K-21 has a lot of defensive capabilities with variations in the ammo such as specialized anti-air shells and mid air exploding anti personel shells.
@NebPWN@NebPWN, South Korea didn't exactly purchased BMP3, it was delievered as exchange for Russia's credit debt that owned from South Korea (instead of paying it with money, both Russia and Korea agreed to replace some of them with weapons).
BMP-3 and T-80U were delivered to South Korean army as both purpose of experiment and study as well as well as put into front line (which is around borders of DMZ).
ROK army and ADD took advantage of this and with studied datas from BMP-3, they used those datas to develop this new IFV K-21.
As far as I know K-21 is now under production and under delivery to mechanized divisions of ROK army, and BMP-3s (70 of them in total) are just a extra.
@neonagasaki you actually cant compare BMP-3 and K-21... there are more than 20 years between them. K-21 is superior to BMP-3 in some aspects like armor and weaponry and this is no wonder, because K-21 was developed to:
1. withstand fire of the BMP's 30-mm autocannon
2. penetrate BMP's armor with own gun (40 mm)
So... u better compare BMP- 3 with some IFV, that Korea used like 15-20 years ago. This will be fair.
Looks like a CV9040. Are those side pontoons supposed to make it lighter and thus faster on water? What happens if they take fire? Good fire control. Does it have an export version?
I think most of the 'flotation device' is covered by side armor when it's deployed. I'm sure it's in trouble if fired upon while traveling on water. HOWEVER, K-21 doesn't have to cross river/stream when it's defended. It can just move to another spot less defended. It's the 'potential threat' of this that gives extra edge to K-21...
Both K21 and K2 MBT are expecting for PIP (Post Improvement Project).
The PIP includes Active defence system and more improved armour.
Actually no one knows what kind of armour is using the k21, but is true that k21's defence system not only depends on heavy armour, in stead of that it pretends to destroy the enemy anti tank missile or escaping from attack zone after the radar detection of enemy gun fire.
Maybe, maybe not. In terms of armor, no one beats the new German Puma anyway. K-21 has same firepower as CV-9040 with the 40mm gun, more modern fire-control system, fitted for, but not with BMS and so on. I think superior fire-control puts K-21 at edge.
bmp3 better the k-21 reasons :
1. bmp3 use 100mm cannon and 30mm autocannon ( k-21 only use 40mm autocannon ).
2 bmp3's engine put at back(k-21 are front ).
3 bmp don't need Air cushion to cross the river.
2942jack 2 weeks ago
@2942jack
It would have been better if we had actually designed this after buying a BMP3. It seems that we made this like a Bradley
johnlewisy 2 weeks ago
@2942jack But K-21 has fire control system that's good enough to shoot down a chopper in flight. did you see the drone getting shot down with a 3-round burst (air burst btw). The 40mm shell of K-21 can be programmed instantaneously for impact, airburst, timer.
dba7dba 2 weeks ago
I don't like the way it throws the shell casing high and forward. Hull down or in a lot of smoke you might not see the K-21 until it fires and that shiny brass arcing in the sky advertises "here I am". What happens when you fire from a tunnel or under a bridge. Better to eject low and rearwards.
Everything else I like.
CommandLineCowboy 3 weeks ago
state of art equipment vs Soviet T-72...
Opuliskii 8 months ago
at 3:04 the guy is saying..."Oh man my days of Duck Hunt are going to pay off"
mchief190 10 months ago
Now the Chinese have a sample of this. It was seized in Hong Kong coming back from exhibition in Saudi Arabia. Lesson is, never use a Chinese port to ship your weapons back.
stalkingalizee 1 year ago 5
@stalkingalizee what is their excuse for seising it?
astrialkil 2 months ago
@stalkingalizee Maersk shipping screwed up. The sample was shipped on a Maersk cargo ship which made the stop in Hong Kong. The manufacturer of S Korea shares the blame too...
dba7dba 2 weeks ago
glad us and sk are on the same side
KHfreak7526 1 year ago
Comment removed
Basti6814 1 year ago
@Basti6814
You are german. Of course you will say that.
MokomaSusi 1 year ago
@MokomaSusi i say that, cause it´s a fact...
Basti6814 1 year ago
what was that last part all about? 3:27
Mark2790 1 year ago
it does look like a bradly.though a few diffences
rainbowsixODST 1 year ago
Needs some work on turret and reactive armor at both sides
Fasoaga3169 2 years ago
they're prototype
sangyuni96 1 year ago
Very nice design. I hope eventually we'll have a chance to incorporate similar into the Brad, expanding upon what was done with the "BUSK Kit". There are plans for a Block 2.0 upgrade, but probably not see that for another 4-5 years.
BTW,...what type of ATGMs is the K-21 using? They look smaller the TOWs, but I could be wrong. Local? Or maybe Spikes?
MorganKeyes 2 years ago 3
K-21 will use not the Spike but the indigenous 3rd gen. ATGM which is under developing.
pkt1005 2 years ago
Looks like a formidable fighting vehicle.
botchedonce 2 years ago
wish i had one of those...
ikaisa 2 years ago
nice ride man...
Fasoaga3169 2 years ago
anyone else think that it looks almost exactly like a m2 bradley?
Modusoperandicod4 2 years ago
@Modusoperandicod4
Does m2 have a 40mm cannon? can m2 cross a river unaided? Can m2 fire airburst round that can hurt enemy hiding behind building? Can m2 fire airburst cannons that can actully shoot down low flying uav and choppers?
dba7dba 2 years ago 2
turkiye rely needs this new type of apc chassis
TURKSTA19 2 years ago
turkey and south korea are partners in war supplies. turkey bought a lot of the new korean mbt's
duntazemebrahxD 2 years ago 2
we have no mbt yet were still making it in the project
TURKSTA19 2 years ago
you guys have 400 K-9s
sangyuni96 1 year ago
i love this ifv i feel the usa should build a new ifv,we had one coming on line but got cut :( but a 40mm gun could be seen as to big for shooting alot 30mm 30/35mm in dp will be more useful. but the 40mm is a killer
Conservativepacheat 2 years ago
king tiger FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
luian90 2 years ago
awesome video!! iff kim kim keeps his tantrums up hes gonna see these tanks up close an personal real soon =)
phonix032 2 years ago
how much for one of this unit weki says 3.6 mil but that seems low
cameronthegreat1 2 years ago
Hi from Turkey
uselos 2 years ago
Hey Turkey should buy this too
I heard Greece bought bunch of bmp-3s to knock you guys down
jonghun4056 2 years ago
the bmp is no where good as this k21 ifv
Conservativepacheat 2 years ago
@Conservativepacheat
True, it started it's career as light tank. But then someone did get "great idea" to make it IFV... that explains why motor is behind the vehicle and not in front like most other IFV's.
Not best solution in IFV when you have to climb over the engine when dismounting.
MokomaSusi 2 years ago
as you say, It's an IFV not an APC
Fasoaga3169 2 years ago
wtf happened at the end?
WARDEATHFUN 2 years ago
Import factor of this IFV is their ability of a fuction, the spec seems it has strongest ability among IFV's in the world..Pretty good job. I am just curious if US has participated the project to help South Korean army
jiyojee 2 years ago
@jiyojee
I'm pretty sure not much if any help/assistance was provided by US. Someone commented US firms tried to interfere in the development of K200 (previous SK IFV) saying it was a copy of US M113. SK engrs ended having to show schematics to prove it wasn't. SK can design Aegis Destroyer on own. Only US 'help' was buying the components such as AEGIS Radar system...
dba7dba 2 years ago
very good look
Conservativepacheat 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking looks just like the swedish CV9040
Gustava500 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sweden sucks, why does sweden exist??
damagejackal10 2 years ago
only k-21 can shoting while moving in the world (IFV)
HamZang1124 2 years ago
It looks more likely the M2 Bradley of the US Army.
gerome0118 2 years ago
helicopter killer.
sibamn 2 years ago
i like the russian bmp-3 better......
jengkollovers 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As such a TINY country, korean cannot defend themselves. Therefore, USA military power must present and command this tiny peninsula. American treat Korean like those in TV MASH. Pitiful Korean.
kbakera 2 years ago
Comment removed
adgqertz 2 years ago
Comment removed
adgqertz 2 years ago
Oh OKAAAYYY
sangyuni96 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is made in Taiwan
gutayui 3 years ago
You make me laugh :)
korikhan 3 years ago 13
This is the new infantry fighting vehicle...basically a armored car...that can shoot down planes... lol
Koinagi 3 years ago 2
is k-21 better then russian bmp3?
neonagasaki 3 years ago 11
No of course not.
MystExil 3 years ago
Well you have to look at all the specs and the function. Note that the BMP-3 doesn't need to deploy pontoons to go into water and has excellent maneuverability. Firepower is probably equaled out because there is so much you can fit into a light armored vehicle, but rapid medium fire support / transport would probably go to the BMP-3. The K-21 has a lot of defensive capabilities with variations in the ammo such as specialized anti-air shells and mid air exploding anti personel shells.
Koinagi 3 years ago
@neonagasaki if it was better, then why would they still buy BMP3
NebPWN 1 year ago
SOuth-Korea isn't buying any BMP-3's.
MokomaSusi 1 year ago 3
@MokomaSusi look up bmp3 on wiki u'd be suprised
NebPWN 1 year ago
@NebPWN @NebPWN, South Korea didn't exactly purchased BMP3, it was delievered as exchange for Russia's credit debt that owned from South Korea (instead of paying it with money, both Russia and Korea agreed to replace some of them with weapons).
BMP-3 and T-80U were delivered to South Korean army as both purpose of experiment and study as well as well as put into front line (which is around borders of DMZ).
kotor87 1 year ago
ROK army and ADD took advantage of this and with studied datas from BMP-3, they used those datas to develop this new IFV K-21.
As far as I know K-21 is now under production and under delivery to mechanized divisions of ROK army, and BMP-3s (70 of them in total) are just a extra.
kotor87 1 year ago
@neonagasaki
mecapanda 1 year ago
@neonagasaki you actually cant compare BMP-3 and K-21... there are more than 20 years between them. K-21 is superior to BMP-3 in some aspects like armor and weaponry and this is no wonder, because K-21 was developed to:
1. withstand fire of the BMP's 30-mm autocannon
2. penetrate BMP's armor with own gun (40 mm)
So... u better compare BMP- 3 with some IFV, that Korea used like 15-20 years ago. This will be fair.
OregonFlunder47 2 months ago in playlist военхрень
I would have liked to see the Halon discharge.
GotIt123 3 years ago
Gotit123,
I saw a video clip of them testing Halon discharge in the crew compartment but can't remember where...
dba7dba 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
weak
ltf509 3 years ago
New korea tank is XK2
yewoo39 3 years ago
Impressive... now what does Kimland have to counter this? :D
Hairysteed 3 years ago 3
hundreds of thousands more soldiers but lousy equipment.
styrofoam94 3 years ago
In other words: Cannon fodder ;)
Hairysteed 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
paper tiger
cuichao14 4 years ago
at least can beat chink imitaion tank
gogozzzz 3 years ago
Stand in front of it's cannon and bear your pride against it, let us see what you're made of.
Crisis7 3 years ago
Looks like a CV9040. Are those side pontoons supposed to make it lighter and thus faster on water? What happens if they take fire? Good fire control. Does it have an export version?
albertkc2007 4 years ago
albertkc2007,
I think most of the 'flotation device' is covered by side armor when it's deployed. I'm sure it's in trouble if fired upon while traveling on water. HOWEVER, K-21 doesn't have to cross river/stream when it's defended. It can just move to another spot less defended. It's the 'potential threat' of this that gives extra edge to K-21...
dba7dba 3 years ago
Both K21 and K2 MBT are expecting for PIP (Post Improvement Project).
The PIP includes Active defence system and more improved armour.
Actually no one knows what kind of armour is using the k21, but is true that k21's defence system not only depends on heavy armour, in stead of that it pretends to destroy the enemy anti tank missile or escaping from attack zone after the radar detection of enemy gun fire.
hskim1987 4 years ago
The best IFV is the CV90...
SgtDrDeath 4 years ago
Maybe, maybe not. In terms of armor, no one beats the new German Puma anyway. K-21 has same firepower as CV-9040 with the 40mm gun, more modern fire-control system, fitted for, but not with BMS and so on. I think superior fire-control puts K-21 at edge.
KJlost 4 years ago
what type of missile is that in the launcher?
redspadd 4 years ago
IIR-seeker guided top-attack anti-tank missile under development at the moment. Israeli Rafael Spike is roughly same.
KJlost 4 years ago
main gun is 40mm vovos cannon gun
gogozzzz 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow, korean auto-tractor, muiticountries-made, assembly in korea, how great!
tintin166 4 years ago
Excuse me, but the K21 is not an Auto-Tractor.
It's IFV (infantry fighting vehicle).
hskim1987 4 years ago
i know j-10 s are paper planes
stsbchu 4 years ago
Holy shit that's a impressive auto-cannon
BluePlue 4 years ago
The gun is a 40 mm Bofors L/70, its a more modern version of the Bofors L/60 wich was used in world war II.
jimmyn89 4 years ago
That's amazing
684shilmido 4 years ago
Fighting! Korean Army. Kill our enemies.
cem5022 4 years ago
I heard this is helicopter killer..south korea army wonderful
kswat77 4 years ago
wow
deraid 4 years ago