I don't understand what's wrong with playing this in a "mournful" manner. It actually is a very dark piece. Not to mention that the contrast between the dark and light parts will be even greater and more delightful and in a way more meaningful.
I don t think we can use the word depressiv here. there we should replace this ugly word with "hope" and desire and a prayer .... by the way I think Schubert had depressiv moments in his life....
This version by Maria Yudina is simply the most radical and dramatic version ever recorded. The Sviatoslav Richter version is to be highly recommended too in a better recording transfer though.
this is beautiful, I heard it played in the documentary "Richter the Enigma" and did not know what it was. Lately I have become interested in Schubert's last sonatas, not thinking I heard any of them. Thank you for uploading, remarkable performance.
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
I love this. She's the pianist, and she is going to play it however she wants. Why get upset about whether it is correct stylistically? There are plenty of other stylistically correct recordings.
I think depression and sadness is as good as any emotion for music to try and express, and certainly don't have a problem with people playing in a sad style. I think this piece, particularly in the tempo it is played here, really captures sadness and resignation, and whenever music can so perfectly capture an emotion, that is a beautiful thing, and shouldn't be avoided.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
deadly slow! Too depressing. I don't think Schubert meant it to be like that, limping along in such a desperate and mournful manner, with no hope or light?
You are absolutely correct! Schubert probably didn't mean this music to be performed this way... I recall Yudina's answer to the question why she played a piece (don't remember what) so slowly and tragically... Her answer was - "but it is a WAR outside" - it was during the WWII. Yudina was not an ordinary artist and can't be judged by common standards.
When you get tired of "generic" Schubert come back and listen again. There is something cathartic in her interpretation...
@truecrypt I know what you mean, but isn't music supposed to transcend all time and situation, otherwise the true essence of the message becomes lost. This should uplift us not give in to depression. Richter did the same thing with this.
As for "the true essence", - of course we all (I mean performers) try to express it to the best of our abilities. The problem is that, as Oscar Wild said: "The truth is rarely pure and never simple.."
Tragic and depressing can be very "uplifting" (cathartic) and in this sense Yudina didn't break the "law of truth" here. She had the reason to play like that and was courageous enough to do it...
@truecrypt The middle section expresses both hope, light and resolve, with an appropriate rise in tempo. I too find the outer sections amazingly slow; but imagine this interpretation played over footage of Auschwitz and the intention becomes terribly clear.
@truecrypt Right. But some people prefer "Always look on the bright side of life!" ( tralalalala.) I just had a message from Franz here. (wait a minute.) He says "I LOVE this version. Every note opens up Heaven!" : O)
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
Thank God she did this in this very manner. It's utterly beautiful. If there was no such "mournful" pieces of music written and performed, the world would be most standard boredom one could ever imagine... THAT would be real depressing in true sense of the word.
@truecrypt :on the contrary, by writing in Russian you aroused curiosity and admiration for your linguistic skills. Thankfully we have Google Translator protocols.
I wonder if this movement is related to any of Schubert's songs? He often adapted them instrumentally. It reminds me of a twentieth century song with words by Noel Coward "I''ll see you again Whenever spring breaks thru again" - I don't know the composer of that song melody.
...dass die künstler der heutigen zeit nicht komponieren,deutet nicht die grenze der künstler an,sondern ist leider ein wenig schmeichelndes etikett,das durch den allgemeinen niedergang der kultur anhängt.
letztendes reden wir hier über kosmetische dinge,geschmacksrichtungen,kleine oder größere sünden.
werktreue ist irgendwie allen großen Persönlichkeiten zu eigen,wenn auch durch die brille der kraft ihrer persönlichkeit betrachtet.
Yudina's playing is not her image from a cosmetic mirror. We are not seeing a ghostly reflection, but the real ghost itself, and she has brought it to life. She has brought herself to life through the music of Schubert, and without her turning real first, Schubert will never become real, for unto what would Schubert project himself? Schubert would have no life without Yudina. Art is about how an artist projects his/her own life through the medium that he/she chooses, so in this case, Schubert.
die diskussion über die neue sachlichkeit und den antiromantizismus ist nicht neu,aber sie bringt nicht viel,da ich der meinung bin,dass alle großen pianisten wahrhafte persönlichkeiten sind und in wahrheit sich richter nicht von rachmaninoff unterscheidet.
er ist nur in deine andere zeit hineingeboren worden.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm sorry to sow a note of discord among the praise, but even though this is a slow movement, it does need some dynamic to it. This performance is just TOO slow - it's becoming laboured. Listen to Vladimir Ashkenazy play it - honestly, it's better.
Dear Toak,You're killing me.I've listened and enjoyed Ashkenazy frequently for decades,but never heard him utter meaning like this.This movement and it's expression is in between the notes.
Yes,a dirge it is...and in this dirge a whole universe of compassion more beautiful and optimistic for humanity than the freshest spring garden...something that music can't easily communicate but she did.
Dear Toakreon, you are exactly right. She is sacrificing here. She sacrificed the most sacred, the most profane. "Wallowing sentimentality"- yes, that's exactly how we pay back....you don't realize that you just saved mankind. You are a savior.
Dear Toak,If you mean by 'sentimentality'...a whole realm of existences which scare the hell out of you and constrain you to 'wallow' in left-brained mechanical denial of all but surface...then yes by god...it's 'sentimental'
But that's where we differ CMR. There is no "whole realm of existences". There is nothing to scare you, or to move you. All you have is "for God's sake, woman - GET ON WITH IT".
Dear Toak,She is 'getting on with it'...in ways that are so very profound beyond sound and occupation.We're in infinity where there is no place wither,but for now you can't hear it or see it in your mind's eye.Oh well (Ö!Ö(
You are absolutely correct. No Schubert here or anywhere else after he died. Just relics of note sequences which are but a dessicated sarcophagus sans dimension. The idea that a 'partitur' could reflect a composer's state of mind is an anachronistic abstraction of late 19th century Conservatory Anti-Romanticism later adopted by the Arte-Deco age as gospel. But THAT idea that has ZERO to do with Schubert or the performance practice of him or his time.
The only authenticity in performance are the ideas and state of mind that the artist uses to re-animate a dead mono-dimensional 'partitur'. Maria gave that in much greater degree than anyone else on YouTube in this piece. No Schubert here...just artistic authenticity and correct historic performance practice."
Well. I didn't said, that I find Miss Yudina's performance bad - but, well - I have the score in front of me and I am even more attached by the recording of Richter - he is not that far away from Yudina, but plays more "straight forward" and actually just what is written. I am just a bit allergic, if someone stops at each measure, creates bubbles in time.
Richter plays, what's there AND has huge expression.
Dear Christoph,I certainly take no offense if this is not your taste.I support your dissent here.But I dislike the frequent suggestion here that she is out of context in her reading of this as that is the application of 20th century musicology which is not at all the performance practice of Schubert's time.
Dear Christoff,I think that Richter imitates Yudina but makes it more palatable for many by his adoptation of modern Arte Deco phrase characteristics.Your notion of 'measure' and time is very 'unSchubert' era as it is so mechanized,quantified,and pressured.Actually to 'play what's there' is an unintended backhanded insult at an authentically non-historical performance practice of treating the score as the body of Christ.
Dear Jos, I take you're point on the overall idealogy of her approach.If you want to compare O.K.Richter focuses on notes to create intensity.She does it by an "inverse" process of manipulating spaces & space-implication.
In the "A" movements I found the con to be a kind of deadening predictability of phrase.The pros are I've never heard anyone shape spaces in between so carefully.
She's a poet of the great Void.The "B"
Movement distinguishes itself through an unusual tone that is a "Wet-Semi-Staccato",& of course moving dynamics.
Well Smith, since you ask (I'm not that much of a commenter)in a way(not evrything) she reminds me of the great Richter.Not adding much of herself but letting the music speak for itself.A rather "intellectual" approach maybe. And the same like with Richter: you like it or just not(I do)
I don't understand what's wrong with playing this in a "mournful" manner. It actually is a very dark piece. Not to mention that the contrast between the dark and light parts will be even greater and more delightful and in a way more meaningful.
wnxg4nd4lf 3 months ago
I don t think we can use the word depressiv here. there we should replace this ugly word with "hope" and desire and a prayer .... by the way I think Schubert had depressiv moments in his life....
uhartchristian 4 months ago in playlist Maria Yudina, Sofronitsky
This version by Maria Yudina is simply the most radical and dramatic version ever recorded. The Sviatoslav Richter version is to be highly recommended too in a better recording transfer though.
MrAam1964 7 months ago
I simply adore this rendition, the pauses between the notes give me time to savor..................
carolineindenver 10 months ago
this is beautiful, I heard it played in the documentary "Richter the Enigma" and did not know what it was. Lately I have become interested in Schubert's last sonatas, not thinking I heard any of them. Thank you for uploading, remarkable performance.
katiush65 11 months ago
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
vkoracx 11 months ago 6
Comment removed
zerbespasek 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cynic150
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
vkoracx 11 months ago
I love this. She's the pianist, and she is going to play it however she wants. Why get upset about whether it is correct stylistically? There are plenty of other stylistically correct recordings.
liekalieka 1 year ago 4
I think depression and sadness is as good as any emotion for music to try and express, and certainly don't have a problem with people playing in a sad style. I think this piece, particularly in the tempo it is played here, really captures sadness and resignation, and whenever music can so perfectly capture an emotion, that is a beautiful thing, and shouldn't be avoided.
tzjc24 1 year ago 3
...out of this world...for me it does it...touches the depths of Schubert like no other to me known recording of this sonata - thank you Truecrypt.
Manunju 1 year ago
This is not Andante, this is Grave.
leomulder 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
deadly slow! Too depressing. I don't think Schubert meant it to be like that, limping along in such a desperate and mournful manner, with no hope or light?
cynic150 1 year ago
@cynic150
You are absolutely correct! Schubert probably didn't mean this music to be performed this way... I recall Yudina's answer to the question why she played a piece (don't remember what) so slowly and tragically... Her answer was - "but it is a WAR outside" - it was during the WWII. Yudina was not an ordinary artist and can't be judged by common standards.
When you get tired of "generic" Schubert come back and listen again. There is something cathartic in her interpretation...
truecrypt 1 year ago 10
@truecrypt I know what you mean, but isn't music supposed to transcend all time and situation, otherwise the true essence of the message becomes lost. This should uplift us not give in to depression. Richter did the same thing with this.
cynic150 1 year ago
@cynic150
God only knows what music suppose to do...
As for "the true essence", - of course we all (I mean performers) try to express it to the best of our abilities. The problem is that, as Oscar Wild said: "The truth is rarely pure and never simple.."
Tragic and depressing can be very "uplifting" (cathartic) and in this sense Yudina didn't break the "law of truth" here. She had the reason to play like that and was courageous enough to do it...
truecrypt 1 year ago 3
@truecrypt The middle section expresses both hope, light and resolve, with an appropriate rise in tempo. I too find the outer sections amazingly slow; but imagine this interpretation played over footage of Auschwitz and the intention becomes terribly clear.
LukeK79 1 year ago 2
@truecrypt Right. But some people prefer "Always look on the bright side of life!" ( tralalalala.) I just had a message from Franz here. (wait a minute.) He says "I LOVE this version. Every note opens up Heaven!" : O)
ellandelachapelle 6 months ago
@cynic150
I personally like her interpretation of this work,for me it stays musical and interesting as opposed to some people here who called her "psychotic"
As for the composer himself-don't worry,Schuberts music will stay transcendental and eternal through all kinds of performances and pianists:)
vkoracx 11 months ago 5
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cynic150
you are right -music is supposed to transcendent all time and situation but do not forget the performing artists
they have their own personality which is expressed through the performance , (I mean all the great artists have something original and unconventional as you know and that is how we recognize them) , something it gets very "strong" and dominates the work and it is a narrow line between interesting and unacceptable that depends on the persons taste as well..I
vkoracx 11 months ago
@cynic150
Thank God she did this in this very manner. It's utterly beautiful. If there was no such "mournful" pieces of music written and performed, the world would be most standard boredom one could ever imagine... THAT would be real depressing in true sense of the word.
100pbl6ok 11 months ago
Getting to know this player more and more. Her affect and effect live must have been incredible .
lovesGenet 1 year ago
@truecrypt :on the contrary, by writing in Russian you aroused curiosity and admiration for your linguistic skills. Thankfully we have Google Translator protocols.
Thank you for the Music.
LovableChicken 1 year ago
I wonder if this movement is related to any of Schubert's songs? He often adapted them instrumentally. It reminds me of a twentieth century song with words by Noel Coward "I''ll see you again Whenever spring breaks thru again" - I don't know the composer of that song melody.
Lactoris1 1 year ago
This is amazing performance of Schubert. The bubble that someone mentioned allows the sorrow to sink in to you. Why cant you feel it?
terrygowork 2 years ago
incredibly poetic
SlyFox616 2 years ago
Pity that the recording is old.... For I find the playing very impressive, the rubato, the emotionality in general, beautiful.
I am very pleased to make my first acquaintance of Yudina..
Nogah100 2 years ago
...dass die künstler der heutigen zeit nicht komponieren,deutet nicht die grenze der künstler an,sondern ist leider ein wenig schmeichelndes etikett,das durch den allgemeinen niedergang der kultur anhängt.
letztendes reden wir hier über kosmetische dinge,geschmacksrichtungen,kleine oder größere sünden.
werktreue ist irgendwie allen großen Persönlichkeiten zu eigen,wenn auch durch die brille der kraft ihrer persönlichkeit betrachtet.
berlinzerberus 2 years ago
Yudina's playing is not her image from a cosmetic mirror. We are not seeing a ghostly reflection, but the real ghost itself, and she has brought it to life. She has brought herself to life through the music of Schubert, and without her turning real first, Schubert will never become real, for unto what would Schubert project himself? Schubert would have no life without Yudina. Art is about how an artist projects his/her own life through the medium that he/she chooses, so in this case, Schubert.
caijpp 2 years ago
die diskussion über die neue sachlichkeit und den antiromantizismus ist nicht neu,aber sie bringt nicht viel,da ich der meinung bin,dass alle großen pianisten wahrhafte persönlichkeiten sind und in wahrheit sich richter nicht von rachmaninoff unterscheidet.
er ist nur in deine andere zeit hineingeboren worden.
berlinzerberus 2 years ago
...there is a slip in 0:48 [score----->wrong chord]
nevertheless the flowing chord-melodie of the andante sostenuto is played quite nice...i prefer part b a bit "piu andante".
berlinzerberus 2 years ago
This really does make me laugh...
caijpp 2 years ago
Now I don't know where to put this! Favoritng it is far from enough....
caijpp 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm sorry to sow a note of discord among the praise, but even though this is a slow movement, it does need some dynamic to it. This performance is just TOO slow - it's becoming laboured. Listen to Vladimir Ashkenazy play it - honestly, it's better.
toakreon 3 years ago
Dear Toak,You're killing me.I've listened and enjoyed Ashkenazy frequently for decades,but never heard him utter meaning like this.This movement and it's expression is in between the notes.
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
Then we'll have to differ. You hear meaning between the notes and I hear a dirge.
toakreon 2 years ago
Yes,a dirge it is...and in this dirge a whole universe of compassion more beautiful and optimistic for humanity than the freshest spring garden...something that music can't easily communicate but she did.
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
No. Just a dirge. The beauty, the compassion, the meaning of the piece sacrificed on the alter of wallowing sentimentality.
toakreon 2 years ago
Dear Toakreon, you are exactly right. She is sacrificing here. She sacrificed the most sacred, the most profane. "Wallowing sentimentality"- yes, that's exactly how we pay back....you don't realize that you just saved mankind. You are a savior.
caijpp 2 years ago
Perhaps I detect just the TINIEST hint of irony, caijpp?
toakreon 2 years ago
No. Just the truth. Why would I sacrifice the beauty, the power, the meaning of expression in an ironic dirge? In every respect, I am a purist.
caijpp 2 years ago
Dear Toak,If you mean by 'sentimentality'...a whole realm of existences which scare the hell out of you and constrain you to 'wallow' in left-brained mechanical denial of all but surface...then yes by god...it's 'sentimental'
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
But that's where we differ CMR. There is no "whole realm of existences". There is nothing to scare you, or to move you. All you have is "for God's sake, woman - GET ON WITH IT".
toakreon 2 years ago
Dear Toak,She is 'getting on with it'...in ways that are so very profound beyond sound and occupation.We're in infinity where there is no place wither,but for now you can't hear it or see it in your mind's eye.Oh well (Ö!Ö(
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
To hear it or see it it has to be there in the performance, not just in the mind of the listener.
toakreon 2 years ago
It's impossible to seperate perception from projection.If you can't see it...admittedly it's not there.
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
I cannot find any Schubert left in this recording. Just Miss Yudina.
christophleipzig 2 years ago
Dear christophleipzig;
Below is a reply from ClassicalMusicReview.
YT is "acting up" today, - so I'm just a messenger:
truecrypt 2 years ago
"Dear Christoph,
You are absolutely correct. No Schubert here or anywhere else after he died. Just relics of note sequences which are but a dessicated sarcophagus sans dimension. The idea that a 'partitur' could reflect a composer's state of mind is an anachronistic abstraction of late 19th century Conservatory Anti-Romanticism later adopted by the Arte-Deco age as gospel. But THAT idea that has ZERO to do with Schubert or the performance practice of him or his time.
truecrypt 2 years ago
The only authenticity in performance are the ideas and state of mind that the artist uses to re-animate a dead mono-dimensional 'partitur'. Maria gave that in much greater degree than anyone else on YouTube in this piece. No Schubert here...just artistic authenticity and correct historic performance practice."
truecrypt 2 years ago
Well. I didn't said, that I find Miss Yudina's performance bad - but, well - I have the score in front of me and I am even more attached by the recording of Richter - he is not that far away from Yudina, but plays more "straight forward" and actually just what is written. I am just a bit allergic, if someone stops at each measure, creates bubbles in time.
Richter plays, what's there AND has huge expression.
christophleipzig 2 years ago
But again: I am quite sure, that Yudina was verrry impressive as well. But I guess, I don't have the right blood for that.
christophleipzig 2 years ago
Dear Christoph,I certainly take no offense if this is not your taste.I support your dissent here.But I dislike the frequent suggestion here that she is out of context in her reading of this as that is the application of 20th century musicology which is not at all the performance practice of Schubert's time.
Alles Beste wünsche ich Ihnen,Smith
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
Dear Christoff,I think that Richter imitates Yudina but makes it more palatable for many by his adoptation of modern Arte Deco phrase characteristics.Your notion of 'measure' and time is very 'unSchubert' era as it is so mechanized,quantified,and pressured.Actually to 'play what's there' is an unintended backhanded insult at an authentically non-historical performance practice of treating the score as the body of Christ.
ClassicalMusicReview 2 years ago
Hehe. Body of Christ - Yudina definitely made the sign of the cross before the play. ;)
But what I want to say: I don't totally disagree with you. But as I say, my mentality (I said blood) just fits better to Mr. Richter's performance.
And in general: Am I right, that this is a live performance? This would be again something else: Her appearance must have been verrry strong.
And: I agree totally, that Richter was influenced by Yudinas Schubert.
christophleipzig 2 years ago
Comment removed
alex7700585 3 years ago
When is it recorded?
pjioayncoe 3 years ago
August 13, 1947
truecrypt 3 years ago
BEAUTIFUL!!
veseli601 3 years ago
What unfathomable beauty and depth!
Mortimer123 3 years ago 2
She plays beaitufully
i never forget Richter's way of playing though...
laqin007 3 years ago
One of the most poignantly poetic examples where music alone suspends time to embrace that which we cannot see : eternity.
PhillipLWilcher 3 years ago
She so effortlessly achieves that quality of "time standing still" required for this movement. I've only heard it before with Schnabel and Fleischer.
alex7700585 3 years ago
i agree. i think that was a special quality of her playing. you hear it too in the second movement of the italian concerto, also posted on you tube.
eliasbb 3 years ago
Yudina's is closest to Richter, who took it even slower with perhaps the most inventive and moving reading.
Brianjonestown 3 years ago
she's wonderful. Stalin had good ears!
Alessandro1985 3 years ago
How about uploading the first part of the sonata as well? I think that's one of the greatest performances of that part ever recorded.
weikko79 3 years ago
OK! Will do! ;)
truecrypt 3 years ago
divine.
liokuokwai 3 years ago 2
Hearing this (and your other Yudina's, truecrypt) makes me wonder how different my life would have been if I had heard it when I was younger.
Hearing her is life-changing (renewing).
GetMeThere1 3 years ago 3
i think she is a spritual person playing for the gods.
chad410 4 years ago 4
she would be happy to hear it...
But it was her gift to you! ;)
truecrypt 4 years ago
I am a god? loll
chad410 4 years ago
I think that she was god...playing for spiritual people...
smithsherman 4 years ago 2
Part 2.I feel Richter automatically becomes a "spearhead of "sound-focus".Very Masculine.
I feel she is surrounding this music like a loving mother.Very Feminine.Here she is more modern.Compare with her older-style Amadeus.
smithsherman 4 years ago
Dear Jos, I take you're point on the overall idealogy of her approach.If you want to compare O.K.Richter focuses on notes to create intensity.She does it by an "inverse" process of manipulating spaces & space-implication.
smithsherman 4 years ago
In the "A" movements I found the con to be a kind of deadening predictability of phrase.The pros are I've never heard anyone shape spaces in between so carefully.
She's a poet of the great Void.The "B"
Movement distinguishes itself through an unusual tone that is a "Wet-Semi-Staccato",& of course moving dynamics.
smithsherman 4 years ago
Well Smith, since you ask (I'm not that much of a commenter)in a way(not evrything) she reminds me of the great Richter.Not adding much of herself but letting the music speak for itself.A rather "intellectual" approach maybe. And the same like with Richter: you like it or just not(I do)
suzettegm 4 years ago