Added: 5 years ago
From: Spartacus777
Views: 105,634
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (341)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hmmmmm an englishman in a Jap car??

  • I like me a Fairlaidy Z

  • @Spartacus777 - There is no such thing as a "3000GT GTO" - a 3000GT is the same thing as a GTO, it isn't a trim level. GTO is just what they call the car in Japan, the only Twin Turbo models are the VR-4s.

  • It's all about the NISSAN 300ZX Yeah!!! and I bet if it had a supercharger you wouldn't be wanting to go against it with your all high and mighty GTO

  • 1. The 300zx was twin turbo and RWD versus the 3000GT is NA and FWD so naturally the 300zx was going to be the first pulling off the line. Get a life if you honestly think this was even remotely equal.

    2. to the douchebag british guy, get surgery on your vocal cords, you made my dog shit himself with that odd gurgling orgasm noise people often mistake for laughter.

    3. Try that sh*t against a VR4.

    my work here is done.

  • @Prancinpwnyvids nuff said pal!

  • jajaja de que se rie este gordo, si se nota que ese gto no esta modificado y mucho menos es twin turbo vr4

  • no chance mate whahahahaa good one

  • Hahaha "No chance mate... No chance." and then some hilarious laugh.

  • you wernt even pulling that hard away from him. You had a tt and he had no turbos. You will get spanked so hard you will cry for your mommy by a 3000gt vr4

  • Your an idiot mate. Thats probably an SL or base model 3000GT/GTO

    YOU stand NO CHANCE if you raced a VR-4 or even a N/A 3K with Mods or TT conversion.

    GTFO with you ATX tranny. lol

  • @real0ne you maybe right but i have actually seen a vr4 loose to z32tt depending on the drivers ofcourse but a great advantage the z32 has on thew vr4 is the weight 3000gts are much heavier then z32s there is a 500 pound difference yes the vr4 is that much heavier so in a sense i have respect for 3000gts also

  • Comment removed

  • he has a manchester (UK) accent

  • no not all mine is normaly aspirated their a good second slower to 60 than the TT

  • Hahah that guy sounds like a shmuck

  • he barely fits in his car lol

  • wasn't a vr4 you british fat fuck

  • More like aussie..?

  • @johnnymohony

    lol

  • A VR4 beats 300zx TT stock for stock everyone should know this already

  • @oxcide101 WTF! no it doesn't everyone knows a 300zx TT shits on a VR-4 stock to stock.

  • not all 3000gt's are Vr-4 or twin turbo! .. it goes some editions with FWD and 205 HP (V6 - 2,5) without turbo or FWD (V6 3,0) with 234 HP without turbo!

  • automatic......sickkk (not)

  • ya actually their were 3 versions of them

    91-93 sl 222hp 5 spd, vr4 300 hp

    94-96 sl 222hp 5 spd, vr4 320hp 6 spd

    97-99 base 198hp sohc, sl 217hp vr4 320hp 6 spd

  • vr-4 is 3000gt,

  • Hahaha what a douche! no chance mate no chance!!!

  • stock 300zx TT is faster in acceleration because of some facts and reasons:

    -300zx weights ~200kilogramm less

    -300zx is rwd, so the gto loses some of his power and potencial in his 4wd

    of course u have always to differentiate between the mt and the at versions of the cars!

    mt-version of 300zx has 283hp, at-version has around 260!

  • i thought mt was rated 300 nd auto ratted at 280 m8..

  • because the GTO is 4wd and z32 300zx is 2wd.

    thats why is a lot faster with z. but it looks like the GTO is SR version, non tuboes ;P

  • Yes, All GTO are Twin Turbo.

  • your an idiot.. no there not. a gto would murder a 300zx off the start and beat it right until the end.

  • Why did you call me an Idiot? I didn't call you an idiot, why do you have to be rude?

    I mischecked my facts, not all of them are, but as I've seen, Twin Turbo 3000GT and VR-4 are more common in the tuning area.

  • 3000GT / Dodge Stealth and or Mistu GTO is the SAME FUCKING CAR.... They came in 2 versions 220HP Non Turbo and 300+ Hp Twin Turbo..Gte ur Facts Right

  • thats what i said u fuckin tool.. and if you knew anything they came in 3 versions DOHC N/A and SOHC N/A after the turbo versions.  maybe u should get your facts right u fuckin idiot!!! i have driven every version of the mitsubishi family for this car. and if you look! i said there all the same in my first comment.. ass. Go read a book.

  • Hey Asshole, Why u calling me a tool cunt? Whats up ur ass ? Bicth...is it a Mitsubishi? you come here and start attacking everyone You Bitch... WHAT ? Did you get Butt fucked by Santa or his MIDGETS ? Fuck U and ur Mistu..you drove that and thats what you will drive for the rest of your life Bum...

  • because u said get your facts right dick.. and i was right u were wrong

  • And what the fuck were you right about? and what Was I wrong about? Your last message you fucking said " thats what i said u fuckin tool" so If I was wrong doesnt that also make you wrong if thats what you said? and Was I even talking to you? Asshole

  • no there not go do some homework

  • I say that from what I've heard, I rarely hear from other models than the VR-4 and the 3000GT.

  • The 3000GT is a whale. The Z is heavy, but it is a true sportscar. The GTO is primarily FWD, the VR-4 being AWD, and a Z32 would out handle a 3000GT anyday...

  • Not so. They're very evenly matched. The VR-4 is a completely diffrent setup than the base/SL. AWD, Twin Turbo, all wheel steering, active aero... Stock for stock they're very closely matched. The AWD will take the launch, and both cars are exceptional in the twisties for their weight as the 300zx is AWS as well.

  • a Vr-4 would destroy a 300zx, he'd would have no chance (same accent as driver)

  • is that a joke... it would be a very close race depending mostly on the driver... and this guy appears to be in an automatic just to point out, 300zx are absolute animals

  • A vr-4 would not destroy a 300zx TT.

  • LMFAO! He's racing an SL and he thinks he's owning... ALso, yes, the GTo is the alternate name for the 3000GT

  • I agree; It's like a professional sports player laughing in a little-leaguers face.

    Good job, nutless wonder; be sure to wipe the cameramans love stains off your glasses when you're done.

  • wrong! the Japanese name for the 3000GT is 3000GT. The Mitsu GTO is the japanese, and original, version of a Dodge Stealth R/T. The GTO (AKA Dodge Stealth) has the same engine as the 3000GT.

  • the gto is a 3000gt.. and a 3000gt is a stealth.. there all the same car!! and a 3000gt is a gto by the way ..

  • mate you woulda had no chance against the Vr4 verson of that car LOL

  • was that a SOHC version of the 3000gt or what?? only way it can explayn that an automatic car that dosent even sound turbo beats it?

  • thats a NA 300zx, because its a 2+2, unless he did the swap. but yeah, either way, the Z is a btter car, you don't need a new tranny after each race :)

  • TT come in 2+2 as well...

  • Only in Japan, he would of had to import it, or do the swap.

  • Maybe the car being RHD doesn't clarify it enough that clearly this car is from Japan.

  • Perhaps the fact that the car is being driven by 2 British dudes, and that in Britain they have RHD standard as well?

  • vr4 will smoke that junk nissan hahaha

  • the driver in the 3000gt had a horrible takeoff...the 300ZX driver needs to get stick

  • nice automatic u fuckhead get a manual

  • You're... Gay? Lol.

  • dosent even sound turbo...

  • fat wanker i race u n,e time on the m25 or m11 in my black 94 tt.gto we see how has the lol!

  • @skinhead27london Isn't that a "jap" car though you Hitler loving douche? Fuck Nazi's bunch of fucking self hating PUSSIES. You're British not German.

  • @dethpig420 Wasn't Japan closely tied to Fascism in Europe?

  • @dethpig420 F OFF NOBER I GOT THIS WHEN I WENT IN TO THE ARMY SO LICK MY ASS !

  • @dethpig420 LIKE YOUR GAY Nissan maxima vg30e PRICK!

  • @skinhead27london Come to America and let me wax that ass in my 2006 STS twin turbo american muscle gto.

  • @bb092488 y go to america to do that? lol

    i bet u have a 1.2l or u get a to take out your mums shoping car lol!

  • LOL.....funny shit this is...

  • it's not a vr4...i own a 91 vr4, and that is not how it launches...if we really do test base vs base...SL vs dohc z32....and vr4 vs. Z32TT....the 3000GT hands down will own. lets remember that 330HP awd GTO vs. 290HP rwd fairlady_Z...about equally heavy

  • why hate on a NA 3000? Hes laughing and hes got a TT Rac e a vr4 then try to laugh lol

  • @oxcide101 it will be the same result get your facts straight 300zx TT stomps on a VR-4

  • @oxcide101 i second that!

  • The vr4 didnt even launch

  • Not all GTO's from japan are Twin Turbo and if they are they aren't badged on the car except from behind the side windows on the black garnish. and unless u've piled about 3-4k into ur 300zx a GTO-Vr4 propperly driven would still be on par with ur 300zx. the reason i said propperly driven is that bein awd they are rather tricky to launch in without forcing the clutch 2 spin on the flywheel where as on a 300zx the only place u'd spin if u launch 2 hard is the wheels, a h/d clutch system easy fix

  • well i own a converted 3000gt, for the racing car you driving don't matter it's on the driver....even though you own a superfast car, but you don't know how to drive whats the point right....so probably that mate with the 3000gt didn't know how to drive that kind of monster....too bac i feel dissappointed...cheers for the 3sx crews and fan....

  • everyone keeps forgetting that the GTO "3000GT" was designed to be compotition for the supra, rx7, and especially the 300zx. when the original mitusbishi gto's came out and began to be imported they wanted to change the name so buyers wouldnt confuse their car for the pontiac gto or the ferrai gto. its rumored to be the reason why they came up with the name 3000GT as in 10x better then 300? no one really knows where they got 3000gt tho, well at least i havent came across a definate answer.

  • the 3.0l engine

  • lol its no mystery my friend. its pretty common knowledge that the 3000GT got its name from the displacement of the engine. 3.0L is 3000cc. Thats how they got the name for the 300zx, because its a tie-in to the displacement of the 3.0L engine. Same goes with the 350Z (3.5L), 370Z (3.7L), 240SX (2.4L), infintiy G35, G37, etc. Car manufacturers do it all the time

  • ya i kno dat im just sayin when the 3000gt came out it was built to be compotion for those before mentioned cars. the 10 times better then the 300 is what i say lol.

  • and you fail for driving an automatic

  • def. not a VR4 you raced. from a dig, the AWD VR4 would launch out of the whole and walk away with its twin turbos. hope that felt good, because you will never beat a legit VR4 with a 300ZX, unless you cut it's fuel line before the race lol

  • lol so true. here a story, i own a 97 3000gt base model stock (well i only put an exhaust 3 weeks ago) anyways im driving around and i come up to this 300zx na. so he says what you running i tell him nothing base model. so i ask if he will give me a run he says dude i have 320 plus hp im like that's fine lets just do it for fun. so we take off and guess who lost by three car lengths? lol not me!

  • um man , i dont think ur story is true , i mean i have a TT and 300zx are all over the place here , i almost always win but by max of 2 cars , so either u have two turbos that u dont know about in ur car ,or either he doesnt , or he has like a freakin hybrid zx with a battery to run it,lol.

  • i highly doubt thats a vr4 ur racing with mate....first off, an all-wheel drive car will always have an advantage from a stop....and i also doubt that 3000gt has a M/T, i used to have a 95galant V6 and wheelspin is crazy...ow and also i have a 93 3000gt vr4 right now....sooooooo....to make it short...ITS NOT A VR4 you beat!!!

  • Yeah that was the NA veriosn. the twin turbo version wouldn't be walked like that. Even if you beat him it wouldn't look like this, especially from launch.

  • lmao is that seriously an auto 300z!? thats to funny!.. and yeaa.. it def had to be the fwd non turbo 3000gt.. ill give u a go in my gto tt and than we will se who is laughing! fucking fag! dont EVER diss a MITSUBISHI!

  • dude race a 300zx TT stock, post it on youtube, and then u can laugh all you want, fucking idiots talk the talk but FUCKING WALK THE WALK FOR FUCKING ONCE

  • will do.. in the summer, and when i show you what do i get?

  • you get to laugh at my face for being wrong lol

    all i can do, but dont forget ur specs and the 300zx's lol

    thx man i just thought once in for all we need a 300zx against a vr4 XD

    i just want you to prove that the 3000gt might school the 300zx ass's but, both of them are amazing cars, so no need to fight about looks XD

    i think eveyone wants to see if a 300zx TT can beat a vr4 lol well hope you get that vid up soon

  • it must have been the FWD.

  • There are 2 seaters and the 2 + 2 seaters. What I want to know, is are you riding in a homo automatic!? - sad.

  • I thought 300zx's didnt have back seats?

  • the non turbo does have back seats

  • not all of the N/A's have back seats. 2+2's are actually sort of hard to find

  • fack off soo stupid soo ugly man this is 3000gt twin turbo no chance for you fack off

  • "no chance meit no chance lol''

  • You can make 3000gt's faster, they are built to actually handle performance mods and not break in 10k miles like 300zx's, that's why you always see junk 300zxs for sale and you can hardly even find a vr4 to buy...

  • ese es un 3000gt austero SOHC de 140 hp no maa

  • the 1993 vr4 is 0-60 in 4.8 sec.if it is the english version.

  • are we forgetting power to weight ratio... 3000gt's are know to be a heavy muthaluvers

  • yeah which is pretty retarded how they can keep up with the other cars right? run fat boy run lol

  • haha your laugh heehee haahaha.

  • 1994 Mitsubishi 3000 GT VR-4 twin turbo Technical specifications weight 1725kg 320.0 bhp 427.0 Nm 1/4 mile - 13.7 @ 162 km/h 0 - 62 mph : 5.4 seconds 0 - 100 mph : 13.6 seconds 300zx twin turbo 2seater (manual) 0-60 mph 5.0 sec. 0-100 13.1 sec. 1520 kg 1/4 mile 13.6 @ 162km/h 300 bhp 371.0 Nm
  • also the 300zx was made in 1989 and the 3000gt was made in 1994.

    And the 300zx motor was not just a new 'faster version' it was a completely new motor which created a new milestone, which inspired Japanese manufacturers (like Toyota and Mitsubishi) to design a similar technological and powerful motor. so without nissan and the 300zx TT there would be no 3000gt.

  • hey tard, the 3000gt originated in 1989 also as the gtx, changed the name in 90 to gto and began production in 1990.

  • I have a UK spec 3000GT TT and Id wipe the floor with that ZX.

  • 300zx IS LIGHTER THAN THE 3000GT ISN'T IT..??

  • by about 200lbs or so, mostly bcuz of awd in the 3kgt

  • 300zx ftw!!

  • funny? i used to own a 300zxturbo with t25 and my friend has 963000gt vr4 stock. yes we've race couple times to dragstip. he beat me every time off line. ive got bigger flowing turbo than the vr4. my turbo lags under 4000rpm which sucks not to mention hes got more hp out of showroom floor. he let me test drive his car and it boost came on by2500rpm it was quicker than mine ill have to agree 3000gts are faster.

  • i agree. 3000gt's are amazing cars.

  • A GTO has no chance..Funny..Are all GTO's Twin Turbo? Are they Japan's version of a 3000GT VR4? Let me know is yall know...

    ------------------------------­----------------The GTO is the VR4.I have an import GTO which is obviously from Japan and it is Twin Turbo which is what the VR4's are

  • no not all gto are twin turbo, sum are awd auto nonturbo. i beleive all are awd just not turbo

  • no all the twin turbo 3000gt/stealth are AWD and all non turbo ones are FWD. got a buddy with a stealth and im a 3S fan too.

  • i believe you read the comment wrong so im not going to jump your case. all jdm gto are awd. usdm 3000gt base and sl are fwd. so yes gto are awd. your a fan, im an owner. i also own a z32tt.

  • i see what ur saying. my bad... dang you own my two dream cars. which one do you like better? my buddy owns a stealth R/T NA and he is always saying his car can beat my NA Z32.

  • not all GTO's are AWD only the GTO MR's are tiwn turbo AWD.

  • It only takes $1500 to get a stock 300zxTT to 400hp. That's definately not serious bucks.

    The VR-4 0-60 is 6.0 sec. The 300zx Twin Turbo is 5.8 sec.

    Oh, and the 1984-1989 300zx only came with single turbos. The 1989-1996 300zx came with twin turbos.

  • 1992 VR4 is 0-60 in 5.3

  • I have also seen the 93 300zxTT rated at a 5.2 0-60 from car and driver. I still believe the more popular ratings of 6.0 for the VR-4 and 5.8 for the 300zx.

  • I dont think so man, most 3000GT run 5.5 or less. I have a scan of a car and driver issue where they put them together. The 3000GT and the 300ZX are nearly identical in performance. Actually, i'll try to find it. If you PM me your e-mail I'll send it to you. It puts the vr4 and 300zx TT as well as supra, nsx, and rx7 against eachother.

  • Hey mom, I need my GTO back to ride with a fool...

    Damm, don't you think that this car was running against you... no?

    3000 is a ball of cannon.... you have no chance against me!

  • they have 300zx turbos but not twin tubos.

  • Love the 200zx's but if you raced a twin turbo GTO youd only be half way down the track when they crossed the line.

  • dude seriously?? do you really think that you would even come close to even a stock twin turbo 3000gt let alone stay in sight? That car was a base model sl as everyone else pointed out, ie NON-turbo

  • buddy even if the 3000gt was twin turboed the 300zx would still win. the 3000 would win off the line then after that the 300zx will take him

  • mate i own a twin turbo 3000gt and i havent come across a 300zx on the streets thats taken me off the line or rolling. you gotta spend mega bux on one before you can take a light tuned twin t 3000gt

  • are you sure you are racing 300zx twin turbo because my buddy has a 1995 3000gt twin turbo and another one of my buddys has a 1992 nissan 300zx twin turbo and from a roll its tight a race but the 300zx always wins

  • the things is at the end of the day my car is not stock and it wouldnt be a fair comparison but what i can tell you is that my model gto (MR spec) does a 12.8 stock if you dont believe me search youtube with "3000GT VR-4 vs. Skyline GT-R" in it there is a stock MR spec gto which beats a r33 gtr whereas 300zx are pulling 13.7

  • how the fuck is the 300zx twins if its auto, ur racing a 3000gt sl!

  • they have auto tts

  • well aren't you a cocky little fellow.. must be pretty hard driving that 300zx if it's an automatic!

  • Too bad it wasn't twin turbo. It'd be a different story then.

  • unusual...?

  • I own one... From the line it should have had a two car jump on you.

  • automatic....

  • YEAH wtf...

  • bull shit! no car can beat a 3000gt vr4 easy!

  • I've owned a VR4 and an SL, thats a first gen base/sl. VR4s are very different cars.

  • And may i add that GTO'S are all twin turbo's! 3000GT's are uk cars-GTO's are imports and therefore twin turbo

  • nah mate not all GTO's are twin turbo theres a few NA out there

  • NO CHANCE MAYTE!! That non-turbo 3000gt is no match for my automatic 3000ZX!!

    lol gay

  • 3000GT'S are as much use as a pony.

    However a GTO as we all know is a twin turbo and would've beat the zx easily!!!

  • 3000GT's have the VR-4 trim level which is the twin twin turbo. In the video was one of the base or SL and base models. Why is this news to everyone.

  • Well as far as owners clubs and Mitsubishi details the 3000GT is non turbo and the UK model.I own a GTO which is a jap import and is twin turbo.Everyone knows that 3000GT's are N/A although most owners wanna add turbo's or the sail panels etc which say either TWIN TURBO or GTO.Bottom line is a GTO would waste that ZX.....

  • yeah good point..! the gto wouldve smoked that ugly reject nissan if it was a twin turb one..!!!

  • dude on a drag a 300zx would kick a gto's ass but honestly the only race a gto would win barely is a track. because of the AWD. but if it is a N/A 3000gt vs a 300zx N/A i would definitely have to say the 300zx because of the gay front wheel drive.

  • the zx is a car ya buy ya wife.

  • i agree lol.

  • def not a twin turbo. thats why it had "no chance mate" lol. my buddy has a 92 300zx and he gets pissed everytime i run him. the vr4s plain out smoke the 300s

  • yea its n/a GTO..my TT AWD 3000GT can jump start n left subaru sti ver8 3meter behind with 6500rpm launched lol n will also smoke that RWD 300ZX..for those GT lover dont do this hi-rev launch or else will break your transfer box cost 5K USD but its great launch if u think u hv to do it hehehe

  • it wasn't a vr4 u r3tard it was an SL (non-turbo), a vr4 would smoke you

  • If it was a TT GTO, it would of walked all over that 300zx.

  • Not all GTOs are TT but they are all AWD.

  • u r retarded, simple as that

  • wrong. SL and base models are FWD. I used to own one.

  • actualy his right, the gto only ever came in awd even when NA whereas the NA 3000gt was front wheel drive. The gto is the jap version thats why it was never front wheel drive. so technicaly asianmorpheus is right

  • And, technically I am right too. I'm glad you responded to a 3 month old reply, lol.

  • That GTO is NOT a twin turbo.

  • im not very familiar with 300zx's but im sure the GTO has almost ZERO turbo lag due to its tiny turbos. Yes i know the zx is 1 ton lighter ive also heard rumors that the zx is fastest V6, hard to believe when ur comparing it to a GTR or a GTO that have zero turbo lag/awd

  • wow this is very odd seeing an exact image of my car (exact rims/color) 93 gto, but mine is TT. It's a shame that this gto was not tt it, i think it would beat the zx(yes i know its 348 hp) due to awd

  • there wouldnt be that much between em and the gto's are faster off the line as they have4wd looks like the nissan has twin turbo's and gto is has none.

  • Hehe! It's me in the video, didn't realise it was on here already. To answer a few qns, I don't have the car anymore unfortunately, it was running 348bhp/369lbft on stock turbos @ 12psi, qtr mile time in that video was 13.4s @ 107mph, yep it's an auto 2+2 and the GTO I beleive was an NA.

  • Yea even in Japan not all the GTO's were Twin Turbo. They still came in the 220hp 6g72 N/A eingine as well as the Twin Turbo version. But both cars in this video are still nice.

  • The n/a's only dyno at 170fwhp.

  • I know but all the stock ratings that you here about is 220hp at the crank which is what I was referring to.

  • blimey ohohoho !

  • vr4's are great at launching, and that certainly wasnt.

    300zx's are a ton lighter (trust me i have a vr4 and its a friggin boat) so it doesnt really come as a shock that its a tad faster than a 3kgt

    that was definitely was not a vr4 though.

  • yeah def not vr4

    i have a 3kgt sl and i could do that

  • zx leaves gto 2 rot!

  • Ummmm, ok. I ran my friends 94 300zx/auto 3 times and my 95 3kgt pulled 3 cars on him from 40-70. Granted, my 3k wasn't stock and his was but mine only had a borla cat-back, fiberglassed intake, gutted cat and I'd run a 9.1 @ 79 in the 1/8. So ummm, no...

  • not even a twin turbo 3kgt.

  • not even a tt 300zx.

    2+2 actually.

  • vr4 rules and will eat 98% of cars on the street...just look at all the races on here, type down VR-4 VS and you will seee for youself

  • wtf. i can tell u know that 3000 would hav eaten that 300zx up. fukn shit driver. i draged a 3000 in my GTR v-spec and we where head to head all the way down. 300's are shit

  • Your GTR v-spec? LOL

  • the 300zx is ans awesome car but theres no way i could launch faster then a 3000gt vr4 awd