9/11 Pentagon Attack - Small Hole Damage DEBUNKED + History of 9/11

[mangoelizard11]

thats alot of holes.....

[roryphelan]

If this 'illuminati' are so fantastic at tricking us normal people, why would they use a missile after they've put so much effort into manufacturing a 'cover story' involving a hijacked airliner?

I mean, surely they would have used an airliner to fit in with said cover story? Surely with all the resources these elites have they could have afforded it? Bloody cheapskates.

[EsqDave]

Thank you so much for making this video. Although I support the right of idiots, mental defectives, paranoid lunatics (etc) to make their 9/11 nutjob statements under the First Amendment, I more strongly support folks like you who answer and debunk their crap.

[Mk101T]

Me thinks you debunkers got hired by Bin Laden , Cuz it wouldve pissed him off so much , if Bush and Cheney got credit for his master peice.

Ha! hows that for a new conspiracy theory?  debunk dat :P

[Mk101T]

Me thinks you Debunkers got hired by Bin laden , Cuz it would piss him off so much if Bush and Cheney got credit for his master peice.

[killercason5]

The twin tower holes were smaller because it was exposives not planes. just kidding. Thanks for your videos they are very good evidence of what really happened on that day. Hopefully one day even the idiots will learn that as well. Semper Fi and God bless

[MrSwift05]

Ops that was my bad Yes a B-25 but still a good size four engine Fighter bomber still a lot of damage ...And why are so may people coming out in support of building 7 being demolished etc what do they gain...

[cjnewson88]

@MrSwift05 B-25 is twin engine bomber, the only comparison which can be made from its impact and 9/11 is the smaller impact hole than the wing span, and the fuel running down the elevator shafts.

Well, there has been a lot to gain financially. the main proponents behind controlled demolition are the creators of loose change, david griffin, alex jones, steven johns and richard gage, all of whom have profited considerably from their literature. A controlled demolition just doesn't add up

[MegaYeshua33]

@MrSwift05 Also the empire state building was built like a brick shit house compared to wtc towers. It was built for hight not office space. No a b25 is tiny compared to a b52. Not trying to be a dick but they are vastly different situations. Also it is a common mistake for people to say a b52 hit the empire state building. Even the media has made that mistake.

[tubemagpie]

Well, there was a conspiracy. The one committed by bin Laden and others.

As a Brit trained in science I am able to view all this a bit dispassionately. What worries me is that so many citizens of the US hate their country so much that they can begin to believe the lies and manipulation of facts put out by people.

This, and other videos go some way to countering the idiocy.

Well done! But quit the music!

[MrSwift05]

A B-52 is a Very very large plain is it not? and the Empire State Building is still standing or not ...there is so much shit out there who really Knows what went on... But when you join the dots it does not look good no matter what side of the fence you sit steel building don't full like that and what about 'building 7' and the truths lost there? The man who had the new lease the change in security for the towers with a Bush connection there's just to main coincidences for My liking

[cjnewson88]

@MrSwift05 B-52 did not exist in 1945. It was, as the video says, a B-25. Building 7 has been well explained, I have even uploaded a simplified summery for those too lazy to read the report. There was never any change to security at the towers, and the port authorities (who have always owned and run security at the wtc complex) have no connection with bush at all.

[tubemagpie]

@MrSwift05 It is false to compare Empr St B'ld'g with Twin Towers as their construction is completely different.

Plse do a little research and you'll see..

[Mr1233556]

whats with the fucking creepy pop up scary ass music???

[kimbles32]

this video is brilliant very true the only shame is people will find a conspiracy in everything even the moon landings just a shame they have nothing better else to do then to play down the fact that 3000 people died in this atrosity by sick and twisted bastards pardon my language they might as well join them if they r that convinced that it wasnt a terrorist plot

[rackemcueboy]

Im probably going to catch a lot of shit for this but...ill enjoy it...conspiracy nuts...sit down...take a deep breath...there is no Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy. Its your parents. I know that you can find a lot of video's saying Santa is real...this is a lie.

[cjnewson88]

@CrusifictionPlaugue7 Agreed but quick correction:

The flash which occurred when the airliners hit the towers happens when ever two rigid bodies collide with each other at speed. It is an immediate transfer of kinetic energy to heat energy. You can see the same happen in this - youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmG­k

[benzcheap]

all your vids are amazing and the music makes it soooo much better

[cjnewson88]

@benzcheap Thanks benz :-) thats nice to hear

[cjnewson88]

@thefreethinker55 its made of concrete encased steel

[Ashlak]

Nice video, haven't seen these pics before.

[WillyMcCoy50]

Where's the wings? The pentagon was built much stronger than the state code mandated and the aluminum wings would've sheared off when thrust into the rebar strengthened concrete. Aluminum is much more brittle than steel and would've had a hard time following the fuselage into the structure.

[WillyMcCoy50]

I see photos. Link me up to video now please.

[cjnewson88]

@WillyMcCoy50 watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4

[cjnewson88]

@WillyMcCoy50 and watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

[cjnewson88]

@WillyMcCoy50 and watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

[WillyMcCoy50]

Can you please provide a link to photos of the luggage, engines and bodies? Can you answer why the worlds most surveillanced building has NO FUCKING VIDEO?? Please explain this.

[cjnewson88]

@WillyMcCoy50 911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/­evidence/photos/humanremains.h­tml

[StickHits]

Funny how the wings of the plane do not even go into the wall here, yet at WTC the plane goes through THE ENTIRE FUCKING STRUCTURE.

[sunsetdrive]

you must be out of your fuckin mind to believe flight 77 crashed there  ...koekoe!!!!

[evilmeerkat007]

LOL

[anotherdrummer23]

so, where's your picture of the rubble? and the bodies?

I'm not convinced...

[cjnewson88]

@anotherdrummer23 you really think I would put pictures of bodies here? thats disturbing dude. go google them yourself if you're really that keen. as for the debris - this video was designed to disprove the 'small hole' theory. If you want evidence for an aircraft crashing (other than the massive hole) go watch my other video titled 9/11 Pentagon truth etc

[anotherdrummer23]

@cjnewson88 I'm just saying that I think you missed the mark, bro. If there weren't so many unanswered questions surrounding the events, then I might buy it, but.... Seems like there's got to be some footage of a huge plane..... its all just too suspect for me.... I think we deserve the TRUTH

[cjnewson88]

@anotherdrummer23 truth is given, not their problem if you don't want to hear it

[anotherdrummer23]

@cjnewson88 Then, why, pray tell, have videos not been released that show a plane hitting the Pentagon. It would very easily end this debate. The confiscated gas station footage? There was only ONE camera at the Pentagon that caught anything? Trust me, I want very much to hear it. Its not been put out there....

I'll go watch your other videos now. Maybe you'll be the first....

[cjnewson88]

@anotherdrummer23 1. because most people know an airliner hit the pent, therefore there is no reason to release others (assuming they have them). relatives of victims might not be happy with the govt releasing endless video of their loved ones dying. 2. Correction: 2 pentagon vids, both are available, as is the video from the hotel rooftop. 3. It wouldn't change a thing. theorist would still cry fake, lies etc as they do with all other evidence proving them wrong, why would this be any different

[unicursalhex]

The pictures you chose in 0:57 and 1:04 are useless, you have about as much visibility as stevie wonder so your impact hole sizing is purely speculative. 2:00 the wings left a distinct signature not present at the pentagon. Nice try dip shit

[unicursalhex]

0:38 you claim theres wing damage on the left yet all the window frames are intact and a 757's wings aren't that low to the ground, even if the damn thing was skimming the ground. 0:48 that hole you claim is from wing damage can't be, officially the plane banked left just before it hit, at that angle the wing damage would have started higher in the structure, even if the wing was scraping the ground, and there's not so much as a scrape where the other wing hit.

[CrazySavageWolf]

thank you.

[vIIvGamer]

Where is the full video of a plane hitting the Pentagon?  Most secure building can't protect its self from a run away plane. Why would they allow a plane to crash into the building?

[josh10177]

"But But But the holes . But uh uh but uh Engines !!!!" the Truthers really hate these videos, makes them stutter. good vid though

[maiden0adam]

the holes you show still dont match those that the plane should have made, also where are the jet engines, they were so called vaporized by the jet fuel, which only can scientifically only burn up to 1000F but titanium (which is what the jet engines are made of) can withstand temperatures of up to almost 1700F.. so this is scientifically impossible... im not saying that 9/11 was the government and all the rest.. im just saying there is a lot of substantial evidence that i find interesting.

[fourbabies1]

and the religious tell us their faith is based on peace. like hell it is.

[guahcap]

Thanks for making this.