@mynameisian91 Here is a video showing how fast it takes for fire to spread from the smallest ignition source (lighting the corner of the office with a match).
watch?v=G6lLbDQcJyA
10 minutes and that office is engulfed in flames and a raging inferno. What happened on 911 was much worse
This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains.
This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains
@theBartone9119 Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes. Office fires wouldn't be that hot. You can actually listen to the FDNY radio chatter that was released with the firefighters where the fires were expected to be burning, all they saw were occasional small pockets of fires, no infernos.
@mynameisian91 "Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes."
No. All the jet fuel would not have burned out in 10 minutes, a lot of it would have been used up in the initial explosion, but that's besides the point. Do you know how fires work? All you need is a small ignition source, and fuel (paper, office supplies ect.) and the fire spreads like herpes for a long time.
@mynameisian91 Plus the "small pockets of fire" argument is laughable (I hear it all the time by conspiracy theorists). They were talking about one section of one floor. It's called not taking a quote out of context. The towers were a raging inferno and all you need to do is review a few tapes to confirm that. Anyway, since you care so much about what the fire fighters think, here's a video of a fire fighter standing out front of Building 7 before it collapses:
@mynameisian91 Sorry not 10 minutes, 4 minutes and 30 seconds was all it took. The video it self was 10 minutes but the fire spread way quicker than that.
One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
Our government is run by bankers and the corporations that serve the bankers. I hope the world understands this.... And the American people are to blame partially... but most do not understand the system in which they are living under. Its an entertainment saturated society that is constantly bombarded with materialistic BS. Our media is run by zionists, our government officials are all members of the CFR or in the pockets of corporations/bankers. And the people haven't a clue.
why do USA need to make military bases in different countries?
why do USA need to attack IRAQ?if there was actually matter of weapons then why destroying cities after cities? why USA doesn't use their own petrolium? why don't attack ISRAEL when the kill palestinees? how many israelees have been killed till now and how many palestinees? how many nukes does ISRAEL have? do anyone in USA BELIEVE that there is no nuke in ISRAEL?WHY DON'T ATTACK ISRAEL? WHAT HAS IRAN DONE?
It's not a smoking gun. It's Thermite. No plane in the Pentagon or bodies with a hole the size of a chevy. The crater that Flight 93 made in Pennsylvania was visible in 1994.
And BUILDING 7....You'll like building seven after watching that Bejing Hotel Fire from a couple of months back.
@frankiebones01 No thermite was used. A plane hit the Pentagon, there were bodies, the hole is consistent with a Jet, the crater that flight 93 made was made by flight 93. Building 7 wasn't built like the Bejing Hotel fire. So how wrong can one person be? Is this your hobby?
@bambam9969 I don't follow no "story", but you follow the Loose Change story, I saw what happened on TV with my own eyes (unless you believe in no plane theory, then you are even more stupid than a thought). I follow evidence and science, evidence and science both dictate that what happened that day was to be expected. Any additional theories about bombs and thermite is just unfounded and is not backed up by any proof. Do you believe the Moon Landing was a hoax and that Santa Clause is real?
The problem is that we've been lied to. And over a hundred thousand lives have been taken around this lie. When the dominoes start to fall, and they will (like a steel building on fire), the lie-believers will change tune and start talking as if they knew 911 Truth all along. Just don't stop working on spreading this evidence in their faces and everywhere else. America is waking slowly.
Not just talking about the lives in the towers, Tony. Talking about the entire WAR. Do you have any idea how many lives have been lost in Iraq and Afghanistan? And I'm not just talking about Americans, which are probably the only lives you've been counting.
well it has been alot. true. but unfortunately thats what happens when wars are fought. now u might say that this war is not neccessary and that all these lives couldve been spared, but in case you didnt know hussein killed many of his own civilians (Kurds) and during the Iraq-Iran War hundreds of thousands of people died on both sides. basically alot of people die always, but it is better 2 make sure that they are not US
Why are you mocking the FDNY? They didn't need 'X-Ray Vision' they were there and they saw with their own eyes. They said it was molten steel. Say what you want but all you are doing is making fun of FDNY and calling them liars.
Experienced Firemen! It's what they are trained in to know what burns, how things burn. When they say it was molten steel flowing like lava they mean it.
Blue.. "Other than what they say they saw there is actually no proof of molten steel."
But there are corroborating proof indicating the high temperatures in the ground at ground zero.
Even if it was just red hot metal, it is amazing that it was still red hot when encountered weeks later. Makes you wonder how hot it really was down there doesn't it?
Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide. Iron oxide is the oxidizer that is NEEDED for this reaction to take place, once the iron oxide is used up there is NO further reaction thereby the molten metal can NOT be from thermite as plain and fucking simple as that.
The exothermic reaction of thermite ceases once the iron oxide "oxidizer" is used up.
Once that happens there is no reaction that would keep the metal molten days to weeks after the ignition of the thermite. any drop in temp for molten metal causes the metal to start solidifying and days to weeks staying molten, no way
As for your second comment: The more exotic types of thermite are used for higher temp materials however the most common and most used is the iron oxide and aluminium mixture.
Blue "Once that happens there is no reaction that would keep the metal molten days to weeks after the ignition of the thermite."
You need to think what is causing the molten iron in the first place. The extremely high temperatures generated by the reaction. Molten iron doesn't just instantly cool down after being liquidated. This goes double if there is a large amount of the by product too.
I know the aluminum/iron mix is the most common one. I just stated that there are others too.
Q1. If it was "red hot", how could anyone work much less walk at ground zero? I didn't see anything red hot - did you? I saw fumes.
Q2. BUT what is causing the fumes and why for MONTHS at ground zero? Haven't seen any photos of "molten metal" - have you?
Q3.The fumes look like steam or smoke, but is it?
Q4. Let's think outside the box... could the fuming be cause by something new, like molecular disassociation from directed energy weapons via our US military?
Were the wtc's nuked? That would explain the freefall collapse of the buildings, molten metal in the garage levels, and the high incidences of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -- caused by exposure to high levels of radiation. Many rescue and clean up workers now have this cancer.
I read that FEMA believed there to have been a series of nuclear events on the morning of 9-11. This would also explain the "pulverized" concrete, pyroclastic surges and fallout. Also: In the weeks following 9-11, FEMA banned photographers from taking pictures in southern Manhattan, without prior permission, or risk having cameras confiscated.
Were the Twin Towers nuked? That would explain the freefall collapse of the buildings, molten metal in the garage levels, and the high incidences of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -- caused by exposure to high levels of radiation. Many rescue and clean up workers now have this cancer.
No where in this video was "molten metal" mentioned.
He said red hot and 1500 degrees I never heard molten.
Where are they digging? In the garage levels, what are most car rims made of today? Magnesium, magnesium can burn for a very long time and it needs little oxygen to sustain combustion. Skivosa either it came down at free fall speed or it didn't, nitpicking debunkers trick some people with terminology? maybe its facts they have not speculation that you believe.
And you think the physics stand up to the official conspiracy theory do you? Get yourself a basic education before you bet against the laws of God. For all that concrete and highgrade steel to have been pulverised you need resistance and with resistance you do not get a 110 floor building falling at near freefall speed - So, either there were explosives and cutting mechanisms pre-planted in the building (in which case it was an inside job) Or, the fundamental laws of nature have changed.
Your right about the friction too. Falling anywhere near freefall speed indicates little to no resistance or friction. So what started the fires under the rubble and how did they get enough oxygen to burn for weeks after they fell? For 5 years I took for granted that the government answered all these questions, and when I looked into it, I found that they didn't answer shit. Wake up everyone, the official story is a lie.
The energy created by the collapse would not make molten iron flow for weeks underground. It needs a feul source. I don't have to imply what made those fires burn to know that it wasn't the heat caused by friction.
Not to mention the towers came down in freefall speeds. If there was enough friction to melt steel how did this happen? Any way you look at it, it defies all the laws of physics. Nothing in the buildings or in the planes would burn hot enough to melt steel. Not even jet fuel.
I fully agree with you. But I have noticed that debunkers like to point out that towers 1 and 2 did not come down AT freefall speed technically, they came down at NEAR freefall speed. When talking about a building collapse, there shouldn't be a difference, but these nitpicking debunkers trick some people with terminology.
Who said anything about molten steel. This video surely didnt show any liquid steel anywhere, nor was molten metal even mention. All I heard was red hot and 1500 degrees. Its just another poor piece of eviedence for the CT crowd.
Each of the Twin Towers weighed half a miilon tons. When you calculate the energy release from the collapse, it is a wonder that steel was so cool! and there was so very little of it!
1500 degree's,and it didn't melt the hose's on the digger?
sparkie72 2 months ago
@mynameisian91 Here is a video showing how fast it takes for fire to spread from the smallest ignition source (lighting the corner of the office with a match).
watch?v=G6lLbDQcJyA
10 minutes and that office is engulfed in flames and a raging inferno. What happened on 911 was much worse
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@theBartone9119 I'm undecided on the issue, but I gotta ask you if the Grill on your BBQ melts very often ?
ncwdane 5 months ago
This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains.
theBartone9119 6 months ago
This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@theBartone9119 Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes. Office fires wouldn't be that hot. You can actually listen to the FDNY radio chatter that was released with the firefighters where the fires were expected to be burning, all they saw were occasional small pockets of fires, no infernos.
mynameisian91 6 months ago
@mynameisian91 "Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes."
No. All the jet fuel would not have burned out in 10 minutes, a lot of it would have been used up in the initial explosion, but that's besides the point. Do you know how fires work? All you need is a small ignition source, and fuel (paper, office supplies ect.) and the fire spreads like herpes for a long time.
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@mynameisian91 Plus the "small pockets of fire" argument is laughable (I hear it all the time by conspiracy theorists). They were talking about one section of one floor. It's called not taking a quote out of context. The towers were a raging inferno and all you need to do is review a few tapes to confirm that. Anyway, since you care so much about what the fire fighters think, here's a video of a fire fighter standing out front of Building 7 before it collapses:
watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4
theBartone9119 6 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@mynameisian91 Sorry not 10 minutes, 4 minutes and 30 seconds was all it took. The video it self was 10 minutes but the fire spread way quicker than that.
theBartone9119 6 months ago
Comment removed
theBartone9119 6 months ago
MAYBE when the next False Flag happens the people wont be so Gullible. Who's Next IRAN or PAKISTAN? Place your bets.
bambam9969 7 months ago
@bambam9969 China???
crackerman46 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
See my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some things everyone needs to know to sort this out:
We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results (15 minutes)
watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk
Can we really think honestly about science without paying attention to the logic we are using?
iBlindGame 11 months ago
Our government is run by bankers and the corporations that serve the bankers. I hope the world understands this.... And the American people are to blame partially... but most do not understand the system in which they are living under. Its an entertainment saturated society that is constantly bombarded with materialistic BS. Our media is run by zionists, our government officials are all members of the CFR or in the pockets of corporations/bankers. And the people haven't a clue.
Brevinlokai 1 year ago
please give this answers:
why do USA need to make military bases in different countries?
why do USA need to attack IRAQ?if there was actually matter of weapons then why destroying cities after cities? why USA doesn't use their own petrolium? why don't attack ISRAEL when the kill palestinees? how many israelees have been killed till now and how many palestinees? how many nukes does ISRAEL have? do anyone in USA BELIEVE that there is no nuke in ISRAEL?WHY DON'T ATTACK ISRAEL? WHAT HAS IRAN DONE?
MrREZWAN 2 years ago
It's not a smoking gun. It's Thermite. No plane in the Pentagon or bodies with a hole the size of a chevy. The crater that Flight 93 made in Pennsylvania was visible in 1994.
And BUILDING 7....You'll like building seven after watching that Bejing Hotel Fire from a couple of months back.
frankiebones01 2 years ago 6
@frankiebones01 No thermite was used. A plane hit the Pentagon, there were bodies, the hole is consistent with a Jet, the crater that flight 93 made was made by flight 93. Building 7 wasn't built like the Bejing Hotel fire. So how wrong can one person be? Is this your hobby?
theBartone9119 7 months ago
@theBartone9119 Sounds to me like you don't know shit. Keep your blinders on and stick with the STORY. The sign of a TRUE PATRIOT act.
bambam9969 6 months ago
@bambam9969 I don't follow no "story", but you follow the Loose Change story, I saw what happened on TV with my own eyes (unless you believe in no plane theory, then you are even more stupid than a thought). I follow evidence and science, evidence and science both dictate that what happened that day was to be expected. Any additional theories about bombs and thermite is just unfounded and is not backed up by any proof. Do you believe the Moon Landing was a hoax and that Santa Clause is real?
theBartone9119 6 months ago
I need the continuation of this video!
GermanRebel86 2 years ago 4
Not once did he say molten metal just red hot
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
@Obelisk2290 v=xbMu2w7fSG8&NR=1 there you go smartass
TheRealKhain 1 year ago
The problem is that we've been lied to. And over a hundred thousand lives have been taken around this lie. When the dominoes start to fall, and they will (like a steel building on fire), the lie-believers will change tune and start talking as if they knew 911 Truth all along. Just don't stop working on spreading this evidence in their faces and everywhere else. America is waking slowly.
TarheelJ 3 years ago 2
no not hundred thousands. couple of thousands. get ur numbers right.
tonytone73 3 years ago
Not just talking about the lives in the towers, Tony. Talking about the entire WAR. Do you have any idea how many lives have been lost in Iraq and Afghanistan? And I'm not just talking about Americans, which are probably the only lives you've been counting.
TarheelJ 3 years ago 3
well it has been alot. true. but unfortunately thats what happens when wars are fought. now u might say that this war is not neccessary and that all these lives couldve been spared, but in case you didnt know hussein killed many of his own civilians (Kurds) and during the Iraq-Iran War hundreds of thousands of people died on both sides. basically alot of people die always, but it is better 2 make sure that they are not US
tonytone73 3 years ago
"Superman powered X-Ray vision"
Why are you mocking the FDNY? They didn't need 'X-Ray Vision' they were there and they saw with their own eyes. They said it was molten steel. Say what you want but all you are doing is making fun of FDNY and calling them liars.
TheCrimsonSkull 3 years ago
Just exactly how do they know for a fact that what they saw was molten steel?
Other than what they say they saw there is actually no proof of molten steel.
Bluetooht 3 years ago
Experienced Firemen! It's what they are trained in to know what burns, how things burn. When they say it was molten steel flowing like lava they mean it.
TheCrimsonSkull 3 years ago
Blue.. "Other than what they say they saw there is actually no proof of molten steel."
But there are corroborating proof indicating the high temperatures in the ground at ground zero.
Even if it was just red hot metal, it is amazing that it was still red hot when encountered weeks later. Makes you wonder how hot it really was down there doesn't it?
ozswede74 3 years ago
Molten steel under all three buildings that fell. The smoking gun of 9/11!!!
cstyle10 3 years ago
nope... more like the hot bullet that was shot out of the gun
tonytone73 3 years ago
"You get down below and you see, molten steel, molten steel running down the channel widths, like your in a foundry, like lava..."
~FDNY~
The FDNY saw the molten steel with their own eyes.
TheCrimsonSkull 3 years ago
the last three messages were meant for dumbass secretmission and his followers.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
Alot of you non-experts claim thermite.
Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide. Iron oxide is the oxidizer that is NEEDED for this reaction to take place, once the iron oxide is used up there is NO further reaction thereby the molten metal can NOT be from thermite as plain and fucking simple as that.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
Blue.. Molten iron is a BY PRODUCT from a thermite reaction. Read up on thermite please.
ozswede74 3 years ago
The exothermic reaction of thermite ceases once the iron oxide "oxidizer" is used up.
Once that happens there is no reaction that would keep the metal molten days to weeks after the ignition of the thermite. any drop in temp for molten metal causes the metal to start solidifying and days to weeks staying molten, no way
As for your second comment: The more exotic types of thermite are used for higher temp materials however the most common and most used is the iron oxide and aluminium mixture.
Bluetooht 3 years ago
Blue "Once that happens there is no reaction that would keep the metal molten days to weeks after the ignition of the thermite."
You need to think what is causing the molten iron in the first place. The extremely high temperatures generated by the reaction. Molten iron doesn't just instantly cool down after being liquidated. This goes double if there is a large amount of the by product too.
I know the aluminum/iron mix is the most common one. I just stated that there are others too.
ozswede74 3 years ago
Blue.. "Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide"
Also:
Any reactive metal can be used instead of Aluminum as well as any metal oxide. Doesn't need to be the normal Aluminum/Iron oxide mix.
ozswede74 3 years ago
Q1. If it was "red hot", how could anyone work much less walk at ground zero? I didn't see anything red hot - did you? I saw fumes.
Q2. BUT what is causing the fumes and why for MONTHS at ground zero? Haven't seen any photos of "molten metal" - have you?
Q3.The fumes look like steam or smoke, but is it?
Q4. Let's think outside the box... could the fuming be cause by something new, like molecular disassociation from directed energy weapons via our US military?
Check our drjudywood (dot) com
CathyFromPensacola 4 years ago
you called that fumes
cc40TX 4 years ago
Yes, the word 'fumes' usually implies something hot is happening, but this is not the case here, so I'm not sure what is a more appropriate word.
What we are seeing, molecular disassociation from directed energy weapons, is new to the general public.
Dr. Judy Wood explains it better than I at her web site I'm sure!
CathyFromPensacola 4 years ago
If nukes were used then their telltale signature EMP would have been evident. No EMP no nuke.
ElectroMagnetic Pulse's would have rendered all electronic equipment in that area useless.
As people were able to use their cell phones an EMP never took place.
Bluetooht 5 years ago
Small tactical nukes do not have the "telltale EMP" like large nuclear detonations -- do some research before you spit crap out of your mouth.
popper666 5 years ago
ALL nukes create an EMP, YOU do the research before you make yourself look like a dumbass, Dumbass.
Bluetooht 5 years ago
Were the wtc's nuked? That would explain the freefall collapse of the buildings, molten metal in the garage levels, and the high incidences of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -- caused by exposure to high levels of radiation. Many rescue and clean up workers now have this cancer.
2Greeneyez 5 years ago
I read that FEMA believed there to have been a series of nuclear events on the morning of 9-11. This would also explain the "pulverized" concrete, pyroclastic surges and fallout. Also: In the weeks following 9-11, FEMA banned photographers from taking pictures in southern Manhattan, without prior permission, or risk having cameras confiscated.
2Greeneyez 5 years ago
Were the Twin Towers nuked? That would explain the freefall collapse of the buildings, molten metal in the garage levels, and the high incidences of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma -- caused by exposure to high levels of radiation. Many rescue and clean up workers now have this cancer.
2Greeneyez 5 years ago
No where in this video was "molten metal" mentioned.
He said red hot and 1500 degrees I never heard molten.
Where are they digging? In the garage levels, what are most car rims made of today? Magnesium, magnesium can burn for a very long time and it needs little oxygen to sustain combustion. Skivosa either it came down at free fall speed or it didn't, nitpicking debunkers trick some people with terminology? maybe its facts they have not speculation that you believe.
Bluetooht 5 years ago
you are one dumbf*&k to claim that the rims on the vehicles is the cause of the heated substance.
Father no hit!
wownofukenname 4 years ago
I never claimed it was the rims I was just adding something else to as what it could be. And I suppose you think it was thermite? Dumbass.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
Of course it was thermite- What did you think it was? A tyre fire? Dumbass
SecretMissions 4 years ago
Do you know how thermite works???
A lot of dumbass' who think it's thermite you included have no idea or concept of how thermite actually works.
When you figure it out you will see that it would be absolutely impossible for it to be thermite.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
See above dumbass
it's amazing how basic chemistry escapes your dumbass logic.
Think before you post next time because you made yourself look stupid beyond a doubt.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
So what is it? dumbfuck. What is your theory? thermite? read above. and your father should have beat your ass more because you need it.
Bluetooht 4 years ago
Either the laws of physics are now b.s. or this was an inside job.
zyby 5 years ago
...or you're just an idiot. My bets on the latter.
butthole99 5 years ago
And you think the physics stand up to the official conspiracy theory do you? Get yourself a basic education before you bet against the laws of God. For all that concrete and highgrade steel to have been pulverised you need resistance and with resistance you do not get a 110 floor building falling at near freefall speed - So, either there were explosives and cutting mechanisms pre-planted in the building (in which case it was an inside job) Or, the fundamental laws of nature have changed.
zyby 5 years ago
Your right about the friction too. Falling anywhere near freefall speed indicates little to no resistance or friction. So what started the fires under the rubble and how did they get enough oxygen to burn for weeks after they fell? For 5 years I took for granted that the government answered all these questions, and when I looked into it, I found that they didn't answer shit. Wake up everyone, the official story is a lie.
skivosa 5 years ago
The energy created by the collapse would not make molten iron flow for weeks underground. It needs a feul source. I don't have to imply what made those fires burn to know that it wasn't the heat caused by friction.
skivosa 5 years ago
Not to mention the towers came down in freefall speeds. If there was enough friction to melt steel how did this happen? Any way you look at it, it defies all the laws of physics. Nothing in the buildings or in the planes would burn hot enough to melt steel. Not even jet fuel.
AmandaKBeckmann 5 years ago
I fully agree with you. But I have noticed that debunkers like to point out that towers 1 and 2 did not come down AT freefall speed technically, they came down at NEAR freefall speed. When talking about a building collapse, there shouldn't be a difference, but these nitpicking debunkers trick some people with terminology.
skivosa 5 years ago
Who said anything about molten steel. This video surely didnt show any liquid steel anywhere, nor was molten metal even mention. All I heard was red hot and 1500 degrees. Its just another poor piece of eviedence for the CT crowd.
toocoldscorpio99 5 years ago
hmm this is 6 weeks later and a noramal orange flame fire is 1500 degres it would have cooled down 6 weeks later
bigdip911 5 years ago
Just wondering, how much training in physics do you have?
emperorinsaino 5 years ago
Each of the Twin Towers weighed half a miilon tons. When you calculate the energy release from the collapse, it is a wonder that steel was so cool! and there was so very little of it!
WarzSchoolchild 5 years ago