the fucking 19th cenury people!!!! we dont have to see it reenacted in today´s movies. it´s there. A completely different world. A world without planes, tv, and cars were just starting. mind blowing
@hallowedbeeddie TO me too!these people were maybe happier.I just think they were happier,slower,they took the time to live,they didn't watch Tv all day.Even if life was very tough,non washing machines,no TV,no car.They weren't unhappy.
Their children are dead and probably their grandchildren too. 117 years is a long time.
Anyways these early films is the only "time machines" we'll ever have.
Btw, the current oldest person alive is Besse Cooper who was born in 1896, and is currently 115 years old (116 in August) ,so you're quite right that there's not a single person from that time (1895) alive.
Cinema is a French invention...Well done France :)
The Lumiere Brothers' gave birth to what might be one of the best contributions homo sapiens can enjoy. entertainmen, documentaries, series, animation, everything we see moving on the screens is because of them.
@norskasbj1 Actually the first working motion picture camera was invented by Edison, but of course where would we be if the French hadn't invented light sensitive film.
@creek2 The first film was made by the French, like the first audio recording
or the first photography invented in 1839, The French did a great contribution in invention and discovery especially in the medicine domain.
Too bad that today, French movies are not popular in the world, but I heard that a French silent black and white movie won 3 Golden Globes and has 10 nominations in the 2012 Oscar...lol even in 2012 the French are able to do that.
This is a really stupid remark. The list of 'inventors' who, simultaneously, produced moving image systems is extensive. And there are records of proto-systems going back to the 1860s. The Lumiere's cannot even be credited with the name. Nor, by the way, are all the films on the selection dated to 1895.
@briannwinston I bet you are a pathetic British dog...Don't being so angry. France was 1 of the most contributor in innovation and discoveries in the Western world. Calculator, Automobile, Hot air Balloon, Metric system, Antibiotics, Electromagnetic waves detector, First movie and invention of cinema, Radioactivity, Tuberculosis vaccination, analog color television, Ramjets Aircraft ,HIV detection, First face transplant etc... deal with it ! I'm proud to be French and proud of the Lumière Bro.
@norskasbj1 From my childhood, I was always a video game type of person. But even video games had their ties to cinema. Moving pictures eventually evolved to pictures you could control. And so on. The Lumiere Brothers' invention not only gave birth to an industry, but others derived from them. They may be one of the most important figures who ever lived. Films have inspired thousands musicians, singers and actors as well. The Lumiere family should really be more well-known than they are.
@Sandekip when you look at night at the stars, this is not their present image, but their image from thousands of years ago because of the distance. Doesn't that bother you too?
@Sandekip Yes of course but these people did exist,they worked,loved and gave birth to babies also..and grandchildren and grandgrandchildren who maybe are still alive...good movie though.Thanks siyanyure for this extra rare movie!!
They still respected each other. They believed in something. They trusted in the future, but they were faithful to their traditions. Thanks for sharing.
ANDA QUE EL CAPULLO QUE SÓLO SE LE OCURRE QUE LAS MUJERES ERAN MÁS DECENTES EN 1895. EFECTIVAMENTE , NO HACE FALTA SER MUSULMÁN PARA SER GILIPOLLAS. Y AHORA PONME UN CORREÍTO CON LO DE "CAPS LOCK MUCH, " QUE PARECE QUE ES EN LO ÚNICO QUE LOS GUIRIS SE FIJAN AUNQU PONGAS UN COMENTARIO EN CONTRA DE LA LAPIDACIÓN DE LAS ADULTERAS.AND.. ORAL SEX FOREVER, SO MAMÓN
Der erste Take kann noch als dokumentarisch angesehen werden, wenn auch im puristischen Sinne die Auswahl des Kamera-Standorts nicht zufällig erfolgt, und die Akteure/Statisten "herbestellt" wurden, jedoch schon zwei Takes später wird - des schöneren Motivs zu Liebe - das Fabriktor geöffnet,um eindrucksvollere Bilder zu erhalten.Damit wurde der Dokumentarfilm zum Spielfilm mit Drehbuch (zunächst noch im Kopf), Positionierung, Wiederholung, kurz: Inszenierung von Wirklichkeit.
sehr schön zu beobachten... der erste Dokumentarfilm der europäischen Filmgeschichte (Arbeiter verlassen die Lumière-Werke) ist zugleich auch der Tod des Dokumentarfilms.
So THAT's what was parodied at the end of that one episode of The Simpsons were they were going into a reality show. I had the feeling it was a parody of something. Now I can get it.
So THAT's the original infamous scene that scared the people. In a parody I saw, the train was running straight forward the camera, and while everyone was running out, the one wise guy standing and screaming "It's just a simplest optical illusion!" was invested by the train coming out of the screen.
I wonder what all these people would think of the world had they been alive today. They'd probably be afraid of the loud sounds coming from the televisions, of people talking to themselves in their ear, of the music, of the clothing people wear, of how fast the cars are driven, etc.
There's this Polish man who had a serious accident in 1988 and remained in a coma until 2006, even though just 18 years had passed to him the culture looked totally different. When interviewed what he thought about 2006 he was honest and said:"Why is everybody in such a hurry all the time and talking in their cell phones endlessly? Everything is suddenly so loud and people have no patience."
The same thing would happen if any of us were frozen for 100 years and then awaken.
100 years ago, really is just a blink of an eye yet we've come so far. Now try and grasp a duration of 65 million years ago. Now try and imagine 1000 years in the future. How will we be perceived? Thank you I've just warped your mind.
I heard that George Lucas is re-releasing this in 3D. It won't add anything new to the experience, but there's going to be at least 300 percent more Jawas coming out of that tunnel.
It would be so awesome if I could go back in time, sneak into their movie theater, and replace the masterpiece "People Walking Out of a Tunnel" with "Avatar" or something similarly head-explosion inducing by 1890's standards.
@AbsintheGlasses rewind the clock back just 7 years prior to this (1888) and you'll find it was the time Jack the Ripper committed some of the most barbaric crimes in the history of human kind. There might have been more respect in general but humanity has always had an ugly side as well as a good one, regardless of the era.
@AbsintheGlasses I see what you mean but there are alot of negative things that existed back then that are on much more minimal level nowadays e.g. slavery, racism, warfare e.t.c.
dont talk bullshit in middle ages the people was burning tortured and killed from the church just cause they dont believe in god other other little stupid things
our time is not perfect but much better then the middle ages or dark ages better i say!
@AbsintheGlasses It'd be hard to compare from present to past, especially in 1895. I'm pretty sure during that time of owning slaves and moving the Indians, respect wasn't dealt. Europeans knew how to whoop their kids those to teach them respect, now I agree that not a lot of parents disciplinary actions. I was whooped by my Italian father and I learned respect fast. :P
@Cuteyoshigirl All the women were decently dressed long dresses, submissive to their husbands. Brought up ther children with discipline unlike the females of today they go to all night parties in miniskirts and indulge in orgies,drunkeness and oral sex and return back home telling their parents that they will have sex to whoever they want and and wives also give orders to their husbands with no form of submission.
@RobertsDigital Wait, I go to parties, wear mini-skirts, and have orgies? It's hard for me to be respectful towards people, when in fact they expect me to act a certain way because of my sex. I'm guessing you "might" be a decent "person", but I do have my doubts on this one. The over-all message you've conveyed to me is very, what is the correct term? Oh, sexist? So when you mean submissive, do you mean women took their beatings and had to take beatings by their husbands? Very insightful.
@Cuteyoshigirl No offence but what I meant by submission is being loyal and non-adulterous. Not beating. I am not a muslim. More than 50% of western women who are married are adulterers. Most of the younger women dont ever want to get married but they prefer to go out on partying,dates and fornicate. 100 years ago most of the women kept their bodies pure before marriage and in marriage both the man and his wife loved themselves. Women were more closer to God back then but not now.
@RobertsDigital : They were submissive because accidentally beating your wife to death was considered an acceptable hazard of disciplining them, especially if they would not submit to being raped if they were not in the mood. Men were not required, even by religion, to give a crap where they stuck their dick, leading to large numbers of wives being infected with STDs by their adulterous husbands. Women stayed pure because their fathers knew what a bunch of filthy shits their own sex were.
@WhiteHawkUK I dont have time for your childish retarded comment & I suggest you speak when spoken to. You cant even post anything serious than join into other peoples conversation and talk rubbish. Why dont you read your post and ask yourself how old you are? Comments with no logic.
@RobertsDigital : Aw... no fun. Maybe I trolled a little, but your reaction was a little melodramatic, wasn't it? It is hard to make a point contingent upon the presumption of exclusivity in exchanges conducted in such a public forum as this, but I will accept that my interjection was poorly composed. It is no excuse, but I was bored and it offered a moment of mindless amusement.
Now that I have had time to properly digest the content of your comments, I realise the effort was beneath me.
@RobertsDigital : Of course you know that blocking me doesn't mean you can't see my comments, and as you've invited me to keep 'talking', I feel compelled to acquiesce. If we put aside for the moment the fact that your personal attack and choice of vocabulary ("retard", really?) undermines your attempt to cast aspersions upon my maturity, we're left with no more substance to your woman-bashing argument than that times were better when women were subjugated and people were more ignorant...
@RobertsDigital : In fact, it's hard for me to think of an argument that better highlights your mental incapacity than your own self-evident ignorance. Only the basest and most pathetic of uneducated individuals could so blandly state such crap backed by a statistic pulled out of their own arse - "50% of married women are adulterers", really? If you hadn't compelled me to communicate further, I might have been content to laugh at you and move on - now I think I might derive amusement for days!
@RobertsDigital : You're not coming out to play, Bobs? I suppose you really meant that I should 'talk' to myself after all, even though you previously suggested (following a severely abused ampersand) that I should only 'speak' when spoken to. Oh! The thought occurs that this also weakens your footing; you attacked my logic with a rant that is self-contradictory. Perhaps, when you realised it wasn't a woman you were attacking, you lost your nerve a bit. Might explain you running away, I suppose.
@RobertsDigital : Of course, logic would also dictate that those without the time for another's "retarded" comments would not be wasting said time on any such self-evidently puerile response, but as we've already established, logic does not appear to be your strong point any more than rationality or linguistic sense.
Do me a favour - ask your mum if you can come out to play - I have exhausted the slim pickings of your witless remarks, and more material means more fun! =D
@RobertsDigital : Awwww, come on! I know I'm not a woman, but I can pretend to be submissive while you attack me with birches and bible quotes!
Well, I say "can", but I won't. I expect that even if ever there was a man socially and intellectually inferior to you, it would not be as much fun for you as pretending that all women somehow are. I'd love for you and my missus to have an argument- once she tired of belittling you, she'd probably knock you out with a jab.
@RobertsDigital : No thanks- I managed to stay well away from skirt-wearing men with wandering hands quite well so far, and I have no intention of worshipping a fairy-tale revived by a power-hungry Roman dictator in his efforts to unite politics and religion in a largely-successful effort to ensure the security of his rule.
@RobertsDigital : In fact, I was brought up to take responsibility for my own actions rather than passing the moral buck to some higher power, I was raised to revere life without dictation; to love of my own volition, and not to hate just because some ignorant ancient tells me to. I don't advocate killing people for wearing more than one kind of thread, or for eating the wrong meat, or for having different beliefs or sexual practices.
@RobertsDigital : In fact, I don't see how the preachings of a long-dead Jew have any relevance to the modern age, when it's obvious that those who follow the Bible pick and choose from the myriad self-contradictions in order to tailor it to their own beliefs, and thereby provide (scant) rationale for their actions.
In fact, I struggle to see what the mention of Jesus has to do with our exchange, though you have done me the great service of providing ample material for my continuing mirth.
@RobertsDigital : I am also struggling not to use the phrase "in fact". I only mention this as it seems irrelevance is the theme for the day. I'm glad you decided to come out and play - I had lost interest yesterday, and may well have forgotten all about taunting you here. It's a shame to pollute this page with my cerebral ejaculate, but I delight at the thought of you reading these posts and getting too miserable and depressed to waste energy on finding a woman to beat and subjugate.
@RobertsDigital : Of course, you've now validated this position by responding with such a humorous response (really; I actually laughed out loud, heartily).
I'm willing to bet a year's income that I've done more good, contributed more to charity, treated people more fairly, and have far more laudable morals than you despite my status as a heathen; and I know for sure that I've treated women better than you have...
...oh wait, sorry; have you even started growing hair yet? I presume too much.
@Cuteyoshigirl : I'm with you. Infants crushed to death in factory machinery was not uncommon during their eighteen-hour, seven-day weeks of work. Women legally forced into sexual slavery. Beating a woman after a certain hour was considered anti-social (noise laws). Starving your tenants to death was a good way of vacating under-paying properties. Beating your slaves was okay, so long as injury was not permanent (though it could be disfiguring). What a lovely, *respectful* world it was, eh?
@Cuteyoshigirl The "I was beaten as a kid and it did me no harm" argument. Maybe in a lot of cases it doesn't but it certainly doesn't help a child learn respect, the only reason a child that is beaten behaves is out of fear not respect, there is a difference. That argument is only used by people who were beaten to justify it. Ok hows this for you "I wans't beaten as a child and did never did me any harm". My parents were against spanking and "whooping" I've turned out a decent person.
@AbsintheGlasses : You could not be further from the truth. It was not until The Great War depleted working-class man-power that new-fangled ideas about basic human rights, good working conditions, and class- and gender- equality were to arise. Being low-born usually meant you stayed low, and you were lucky not to be treated like an animal worked to death in unsafe conditions. People thrived on the literal blood, sweat, and suffering of those beneath them.
@AbsintheGlasses : ...so, great, yeah - we now have the right to treat everybody like shit and withhold respect from anybody we choose, rather than having it dictated by society at large. We can thank the fact that even our poorest are better off than those in developing countries who have now taken the place of our own 'untouchables'. We gave our people the right to humane treatment in their stead, and with it, the right to be scum by choice.
@AbsintheGlasses People helped others more? Well consider that there was still child labour in the Western World at this time, slums in the East End of London and countless other cities across Europe, women didn't have the vote, gay people were sent to prison and given hard labour; it doesn't sound like a better world to me. I'm sure there were just as many disrespectful and anti-social people back then, it's just people don't appreiciate what age they are living in.
This made me want to cry, in a good way! The hat-tipping, the family picnic, the elegant clothing, lively expressions. It feels like such a warm, familiar place to be.
Just spirits on a human journey ! don't take life to seriously... look at the baby(235) doing what babies do - this could be yesterday or 500 years ago. Thanks for sharing:)
@TheBigGnome If that baby lived a healthy and long life, if I could find that person , I could have brought that person in for my High school project about life in the early 1900's. My Project was done in 1985 when I was 15 and "the baby" at 2:32 could have explained life back to my class instead of me showing still black and white photographs. Yes, the child is definitely passed on now but he/she could have being still alive when I was a child myself ! Wow, that is amazing to thing about.
To me, this is the kind of thing that makes film special, as an art form. Unlike books, music, theater, paintings, etc., which are merely representations and second-hand testimony, film actually allows us to see, first hand, worlds that we're never seen, and people who may not even be alive any more. A window into the past. Marvelous.
I like the guys who tipped their hats and waved to the camera. Little did they know that the people who would see their gestures would be 100+ years in the future. Here we are in an electronic age, with computers, DVDs, video games, etc. and what are we doing? Looking back at the past. Our hats off to you, friendly strangers from the past!
jose rizal died in 1896
freakahurt 3 weeks ago
Why i'm watching that?
ReYpSikOPaTiK 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ReYpSikOPaTiK 3 weeks ago
the fucking 19th cenury people!!!! we dont have to see it reenacted in today´s movies. it´s there. A completely different world. A world without planes, tv, and cars were just starting. mind blowing
hallowedbeeddie 3 weeks ago
and to know that not a single human being from that time is alive. Like watching a different world. To me it´s just amazing.
hallowedbeeddie 3 weeks ago 4
@hallowedbeeddie TO me too!these people were maybe happier.I just think they were happier,slower,they took the time to live,they didn't watch Tv all day.Even if life was very tough,non washing machines,no TV,no car.They weren't unhappy.
fisteberg 1 week ago
@hallowedbeeddie
Their children are dead and probably their grandchildren too. 117 years is a long time.
Anyways these early films is the only "time machines" we'll ever have.
Btw, the current oldest person alive is Besse Cooper who was born in 1896, and is currently 115 years old (116 in August) ,so you're quite right that there's not a single person from that time (1895) alive.
McLarenMercedes 4 days ago
That guy got spanked.
cadamiller 4 weeks ago
Cinema is a French invention...Well done France :)
The Lumiere Brothers' gave birth to what might be one of the best contributions homo sapiens can enjoy. entertainmen, documentaries, series, animation, everything we see moving on the screens is because of them.
norskasbj1 1 month ago 26
@norskasbj1 Actually the first working motion picture camera was invented by Edison, but of course where would we be if the French hadn't invented light sensitive film.
creek201 3 days ago
@creek2 The first film was made by the French, like the first audio recording
or the first photography invented in 1839, The French did a great contribution in invention and discovery especially in the medicine domain.
Too bad that today, French movies are not popular in the world, but I heard that a French silent black and white movie won 3 Golden Globes and has 10 nominations in the 2012 Oscar...lol even in 2012 the French are able to do that.
Don't get me wrong "the Artist" was brillant.
matsumotoyon 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@norskasbj1
This is a really stupid remark. The list of 'inventors' who, simultaneously, produced moving image systems is extensive. And there are records of proto-systems going back to the 1860s. The Lumiere's cannot even be credited with the name. Nor, by the way, are all the films on the selection dated to 1895.
Brian Winston
briannwinston 22 hours ago
@briannwinston I bet you are a pathetic British dog...Don't being so angry. France was 1 of the most contributor in innovation and discoveries in the Western world. Calculator, Automobile, Hot air Balloon, Metric system, Antibiotics, Electromagnetic waves detector, First movie and invention of cinema, Radioactivity, Tuberculosis vaccination, analog color television, Ramjets Aircraft ,HIV detection, First face transplant etc... deal with it ! I'm proud to be French and proud of the Lumière Bro.
minhounou 14 hours ago 9
@norskasbj1 From my childhood, I was always a video game type of person. But even video games had their ties to cinema. Moving pictures eventually evolved to pictures you could control. And so on. The Lumiere Brothers' invention not only gave birth to an industry, but others derived from them. They may be one of the most important figures who ever lived. Films have inspired thousands musicians, singers and actors as well. The Lumiere family should really be more well-known than they are.
vgman94 11 hours ago
but melies is god !
:D
turkmensah 1 month ago
AHHH A TRAIN COMING TOWARDS US AHHHHH
hlashflahflhsjfh 1 month ago
@hlashflahflhsjfh People actually got up and rushingly exited the room. At least most of them.
Somanous 3 weeks ago
one dose not simply point a camera at the truth
IronSpike11 1 month ago
Lumiere Brothers...WONDERFUL!!! ... Whats the music in this?
utubermena 1 month ago
From a historical standpoint, this is awesome.
From an entertainment standpoint, this is shit.
ZeekyHB0MB 2 months ago
@ZeekyHB0MB entertainment is only ONE of the several things that film-making explores... movies are not only entertainment.
viejoratondeltiempo 1 month ago
@viejoratondeltiempo I would argue though that 99% of all film is entertainment... Even educational film is "entertainment" in the technical sense.
MisterMcMaestro 1 month ago 4
so freakin boring
MsKbug 2 months ago
this is amazing, think of it, this is recorded 116 years ago wow.. dont know why but i think this is amazingly cool :D
FlipAran 2 months ago 2
I like the part when they walk
RobbanFoxer 2 months ago 3
At around 5:50, it starts going backward. Was that a modification, or did the Lumiere Brothers actually make it like that?
94539shadow 2 months ago in playlist Early Cinema 1894 - 1915
Chubby was in.
nadeems 2 months ago
1895, my God...
RadaSs90 2 months ago 2
@Mrjonlennonlegend even if they were born the day this film was made they would be dead now. ..thatd make em 116 years old.
coolbluesinatra 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
almost everyone in this film are smiling
pedrosergio1000 3 months ago
so everyone in this film are dead? no one is still alive?
MrJohnlennonlegend 3 months ago
@MrJohnlennonlegend Maybe if that baby is like the oldest man alive. haaa.
dbbonecrusher 2 months ago
check out where photography comes from too... vive la france!
bitekle 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imagine telling those people, that 110 years later one can see them on a video-sharing website called YouTube.
Progress, you scary.
BetweenFireAndFire 3 months ago 18
apparently in 1895, HATS ARE MANDATORY!
ProfessorWalty 3 months ago
All women are soooo fat!
taxiwarrior 3 months ago
They are ghost now !!!!
MrWarloq 3 months ago
the beauty of simplicity
pedrosergio1000 3 months ago 2
game over!
jacksonlako 4 months ago
weird to think that every single person in that video is dead now
ArcticTrees 4 months ago
@ArcticTrees
Even the baby.
RunikaMori 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I see dead people
Sandekip 4 months ago 49
@Sandekip when you look at night at the stars, this is not their present image, but their image from thousands of years ago because of the distance. Doesn't that bother you too?
RedgardH 3 months ago
@Sandekip Yes of course but these people did exist,they worked,loved and gave birth to babies also..and grandchildren and grandgrandchildren who maybe are still alive...good movie though.Thanks siyanyure for this extra rare movie!!
fisteberg 1 week ago
Look at all those dead people walking...
djab2 4 months ago
impresionante!
mininojuan 4 months ago
模擬試験で読んだ評論文の題材にされていたので気になって見てみました。
3:15 の少年がホースに悪戯をするシーンで笑ってしまいました。
『トムとジェリー』に通ずる面白さが１９世紀に既にあったことにびっくりです。
clarinettou 4 months ago
They still respected each other. They believed in something. They trusted in the future, but they were faithful to their traditions. Thanks for sharing.
TheDzs1 4 months ago
Better than Twilight
waddlerobloxxxx 4 months ago 5
was trying to work out what the music reminded me of. Just realised it's a lot like the "Up" theme
billythehick 4 months ago
what is the film at 3:43? the poker one, need the title for a project
aarontheairsofter 4 months ago
Music????
Ardenella 4 months ago
All of these people are now lost in time.
MarvelLegendsXI 4 months ago
Thumbs up if you're here for Weedman.
MrBobchaizzle 5 months ago 3
If these people see todays mini-skirt , they will get fainted.
puketinho 5 months ago
LISTEN!!! I SAW THE SAME WOMAN TAKING BY A CELL PHONE!!
fijatenadamas 5 months ago
If there was one era I wish I could have lived in, it would be the 1890s.
AIKevorkian 5 months ago
That's the precursor to Charlie Chaplin. Very funny :D
3DMasterST 5 months ago
BEAUTIFUL! GENIOUS!!
TMUSICIAN 5 months ago
what is the name of the song? is very beautifull :)
ragazzaincahuasi 5 months ago
wow really amazing :D
ragazzaincahuasi 5 months ago
Francia hizo la primera pelicula de todo el mundo en 1895
765andreita 5 months ago
la primera pelicula en francia :D los hermanos """lumiere"""
765andreita 5 months ago
they look human ....they act human.....
Chino7762 6 months ago
Thank you so much for this video from Italy
AruFenice 6 months ago
This is real ART!
TopSnakeTv 6 months ago
ANDA QUE EL CAPULLO QUE SÓLO SE LE OCURRE QUE LAS MUJERES ERAN MÁS DECENTES EN 1895. EFECTIVAMENTE , NO HACE FALTA SER MUSULMÁN PARA SER GILIPOLLAS. Y AHORA PONME UN CORREÍTO CON LO DE "CAPS LOCK MUCH, " QUE PARECE QUE ES EN LO ÚNICO QUE LOS GUIRIS SE FIJAN AUNQU PONGAS UN COMENTARIO EN CONTRA DE LA LAPIDACIÓN DE LAS ADULTERAS.AND.. ORAL SEX FOREVER, SO MAMÓN
servatoaisaggi 6 months ago
Hollywood is crap! This is the best film I ever seen!
laksemann 6 months ago
it's like going back in time. I am facsinated by this films. I love that era.
safiyaclaire 6 months ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
i agree with you absintheglasses...we are losing our humanity and morality.
safiyaclaire 6 months ago
download the video and slow it down to see it as it really was
Argo108 6 months ago
02:32 Saber que não estão mais vivos...
gustavohdtv 6 months ago
Der erste Take kann noch als dokumentarisch angesehen werden, wenn auch im puristischen Sinne die Auswahl des Kamera-Standorts nicht zufällig erfolgt, und die Akteure/Statisten "herbestellt" wurden, jedoch schon zwei Takes später wird - des schöneren Motivs zu Liebe - das Fabriktor geöffnet,um eindrucksvollere Bilder zu erhalten.Damit wurde der Dokumentarfilm zum Spielfilm mit Drehbuch (zunächst noch im Kopf), Positionierung, Wiederholung, kurz: Inszenierung von Wirklichkeit.
tubepirat 7 months ago
sehr schön zu beobachten... der erste Dokumentarfilm der europäischen Filmgeschichte (Arbeiter verlassen die Lumière-Werke) ist zugleich auch der Tod des Dokumentarfilms.
tubepirat 7 months ago
The famous scene with the train approaching that scared the shit out of thousands of people when they first saw it back then. Lol
Kazoo4U 7 months ago 25
@Kazoo4U heh imagine if they saw something in 3d
TheErcleman 5 months ago
@Kazoo4U Lol, imagine they watching paranormal activity 2 back then :P
Imak3 3 months ago
4:25 I read someplace that when that scene was shown at the Paris exposition, half the audience dove for cover!
emmers57 7 months ago
That is one big ass dog!
emmers57 7 months ago
Is the dog still alive ?
Arjetube 7 months ago
@Arjetube Yes, i love that Dog, it is the big star.
buddyeagle 6 months ago
@buddyeagle would you love it to Fxxx you.
michaelwright999 6 months ago
I was born 100 years after this was filmed... freaky.
thepoollad 7 months ago
I like the part with the dog
ToxicleDaily 7 months ago
"Oblany ogrodnik" jest śmieszniejszy niż "Jestem hardkorem" i "Ale urwał".
Kamilprezes1 7 months ago
okay..let's put the wall back up again and let's pickaxed this time.
*LOL!!!
westport17782010 7 months ago
obras de arte
javieribera 7 months ago
到此一游
dazhuang1990 7 months ago
nice, for 1895
ivancek11 7 months ago
Can anyone tell me where can I find this or something like this music?
biedrona42 7 months ago
@ 3:10
So THAT's what was parodied at the end of that one episode of The Simpsons were they were going into a reality show. I had the feeling it was a parody of something. Now I can get it.
@ 4:28
So THAT's the original infamous scene that scared the people. In a parody I saw, the train was running straight forward the camera, and while everyone was running out, the one wise guy standing and screaming "It's just a simplest optical illusion!" was invested by the train coming out of the screen.
HypercatZ 7 months ago
MERCI , MAGNIFIQUE ****8))))*****
miko50474 7 months ago
I wonder what all these people would think of the world had they been alive today. They'd probably be afraid of the loud sounds coming from the televisions, of people talking to themselves in their ear, of the music, of the clothing people wear, of how fast the cars are driven, etc.
dirtynuke 7 months ago
@dirtynuke
There's this Polish man who had a serious accident in 1988 and remained in a coma until 2006, even though just 18 years had passed to him the culture looked totally different. When interviewed what he thought about 2006 he was honest and said:"Why is everybody in such a hurry all the time and talking in their cell phones endlessly? Everything is suddenly so loud and people have no patience."
The same thing would happen if any of us were frozen for 100 years and then awaken.
McLarenMercedes 7 months ago
:)
ENSOÑACIONES
STNEIDERIN 8 months ago
the protagonist is an annoying dog
Sanchoelmalo 8 months ago
you see how big that fkn dog was?
wonnoyng 8 months ago
i remember back when this came out i was about 12
TheDemonicHeretic 8 months ago
100 years ago, really is just a blink of an eye yet we've come so far. Now try and grasp a duration of 65 million years ago. Now try and imagine 1000 years in the future. How will we be perceived? Thank you I've just warped your mind.
xshoreLS1 8 months ago
@xshoreLS1 im sure we will have some big war or revolution that puts us back 1000 yrs before we reach 1000 yrs
wonnoyng 8 months ago
Comment removed
xshoreLS1 8 months ago
@xshoreLS1 The way in which the human race is going, I very much doubt whether we will be here in a 100 years let alone a 1000 years.
576924 8 months ago
I heard that George Lucas is re-releasing this in 3D. It won't add anything new to the experience, but there's going to be at least 300 percent more Jawas coming out of that tunnel.
donavonbray 8 months ago 2
It would be so awesome if I could go back in time, sneak into their movie theater, and replace the masterpiece "People Walking Out of a Tunnel" with "Avatar" or something similarly head-explosion inducing by 1890's standards.
donavonbray 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Trusted bbw women dating site naneedj.info
bleveskidora 8 months ago
Great, but why in the heck is that film running backward nearly at end of the clip programs ??
Silencebound 9 months ago
Catchy tune.
FrankinKal96 10 months ago
I think I saw one of those women with a mobile phone....
LaurelVentura 10 months ago
woooww 0:23
in that time, the dogs are giants,, and now, our dogs are little gay shits
redeadx5 10 months ago
@redeadx5 Ever looked at an old house? They're made for short people. Now the dogs might of stayed the same size.
PokemonTrainerAriel 6 months ago
This song reminds me of UP!
illestVill4in 10 months ago 2
I wish people had the manners and respect they did back then for their fellow human being.
Sure things weren't perfect but people helped others more and cared.
You would think by now we would have learned even better how to care and give a damn.
Humanity has gone backwards, imo.
AbsintheGlasses 10 months ago 17
@AbsintheGlasses rewind the clock back just 7 years prior to this (1888) and you'll find it was the time Jack the Ripper committed some of the most barbaric crimes in the history of human kind. There might have been more respect in general but humanity has always had an ugly side as well as a good one, regardless of the era.
scotthazellcomposer 9 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses I see what you mean but there are alot of negative things that existed back then that are on much more minimal level nowadays e.g. slavery, racism, warfare e.t.c.
jackalan88 7 months ago 2
@AbsintheGlasses Yeah, because blacks weren't enslaved and women had the right to vote back then. Oh wait...
ryanmshepard92 7 months ago 2
@AbsintheGlasses
wtf are u rambling on about..........? how can you say shit like that on a piece of footage by the pioneering Lumiere Brothers........
NORFIE123456 7 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses I agree. We live in a corrupt world
johanneszero1990 6 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses
dont talk bullshit in middle ages the people was burning tortured and killed from the church just cause they dont believe in god other other little stupid things
our time is not perfect but much better then the middle ages or dark ages better i say!
Ulansananelan 6 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses It'd be hard to compare from present to past, especially in 1895. I'm pretty sure during that time of owning slaves and moving the Indians, respect wasn't dealt. Europeans knew how to whoop their kids those to teach them respect, now I agree that not a lot of parents disciplinary actions. I was whooped by my Italian father and I learned respect fast. :P
Cuteyoshigirl 6 months ago
@Cuteyoshigirl All the women were decently dressed long dresses, submissive to their husbands. Brought up ther children with discipline unlike the females of today they go to all night parties in miniskirts and indulge in orgies,drunkeness and oral sex and return back home telling their parents that they will have sex to whoever they want and and wives also give orders to their husbands with no form of submission.
RobertsDigital 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital Wait, I go to parties, wear mini-skirts, and have orgies? It's hard for me to be respectful towards people, when in fact they expect me to act a certain way because of my sex. I'm guessing you "might" be a decent "person", but I do have my doubts on this one. The over-all message you've conveyed to me is very, what is the correct term? Oh, sexist? So when you mean submissive, do you mean women took their beatings and had to take beatings by their husbands? Very insightful.
Cuteyoshigirl 6 months ago
@Cuteyoshigirl No offence but what I meant by submission is being loyal and non-adulterous. Not beating. I am not a muslim. More than 50% of western women who are married are adulterers. Most of the younger women dont ever want to get married but they prefer to go out on partying,dates and fornicate. 100 years ago most of the women kept their bodies pure before marriage and in marriage both the man and his wife loved themselves. Women were more closer to God back then but not now.
RobertsDigital 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : They were submissive because accidentally beating your wife to death was considered an acceptable hazard of disciplining them, especially if they would not submit to being raped if they were not in the mood. Men were not required, even by religion, to give a crap where they stuck their dick, leading to large numbers of wives being infected with STDs by their adulterous husbands. Women stayed pure because their fathers knew what a bunch of filthy shits their own sex were.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@WhiteHawkUK I dont have time for your childish retarded comment & I suggest you speak when spoken to. You cant even post anything serious than join into other peoples conversation and talk rubbish. Why dont you read your post and ask yourself how old you are? Comments with no logic.
Well you asked for it. Keep talking to yourself.
RobertsDigital 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : I have never needed permission to talk to myself before, but I am grateful for your gracious blessing all the same. =D =D
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : Aw... no fun. Maybe I trolled a little, but your reaction was a little melodramatic, wasn't it? It is hard to make a point contingent upon the presumption of exclusivity in exchanges conducted in such a public forum as this, but I will accept that my interjection was poorly composed. It is no excuse, but I was bored and it offered a moment of mindless amusement.
Now that I have had time to properly digest the content of your comments, I realise the effort was beneath me.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
Comment removed
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : Of course you know that blocking me doesn't mean you can't see my comments, and as you've invited me to keep 'talking', I feel compelled to acquiesce. If we put aside for the moment the fact that your personal attack and choice of vocabulary ("retard", really?) undermines your attempt to cast aspersions upon my maturity, we're left with no more substance to your woman-bashing argument than that times were better when women were subjugated and people were more ignorant...
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : In fact, it's hard for me to think of an argument that better highlights your mental incapacity than your own self-evident ignorance. Only the basest and most pathetic of uneducated individuals could so blandly state such crap backed by a statistic pulled out of their own arse - "50% of married women are adulterers", really? If you hadn't compelled me to communicate further, I might have been content to laugh at you and move on - now I think I might derive amusement for days!
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : You're not coming out to play, Bobs? I suppose you really meant that I should 'talk' to myself after all, even though you previously suggested (following a severely abused ampersand) that I should only 'speak' when spoken to. Oh! The thought occurs that this also weakens your footing; you attacked my logic with a rant that is self-contradictory. Perhaps, when you realised it wasn't a woman you were attacking, you lost your nerve a bit. Might explain you running away, I suppose.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : Of course, logic would also dictate that those without the time for another's "retarded" comments would not be wasting said time on any such self-evidently puerile response, but as we've already established, logic does not appear to be your strong point any more than rationality or linguistic sense.
Do me a favour - ask your mum if you can come out to play - I have exhausted the slim pickings of your witless remarks, and more material means more fun! =D
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@WhiteHawkUK You need salvation for your soul. Its for your good.
RobertsDigital 6 months ago
Comment removed
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RobertsDigital : Awwww, come on! I know I'm not a woman, but I can pretend to be submissive while you attack me with birches and bible quotes!
Well, I say "can", but I won't. I expect that even if ever there was a man socially and intellectually inferior to you, it would not be as much fun for you as pretending that all women somehow are. I'd love for you and my missus to have an argument- once she tired of belittling you, she'd probably knock you out with a jab.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@WhiteHawkUK You need Jesus in your life.
RobertsDigital 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : No thanks- I managed to stay well away from skirt-wearing men with wandering hands quite well so far, and I have no intention of worshipping a fairy-tale revived by a power-hungry Roman dictator in his efforts to unite politics and religion in a largely-successful effort to ensure the security of his rule.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : In fact, I was brought up to take responsibility for my own actions rather than passing the moral buck to some higher power, I was raised to revere life without dictation; to love of my own volition, and not to hate just because some ignorant ancient tells me to. I don't advocate killing people for wearing more than one kind of thread, or for eating the wrong meat, or for having different beliefs or sexual practices.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : In fact, I don't see how the preachings of a long-dead Jew have any relevance to the modern age, when it's obvious that those who follow the Bible pick and choose from the myriad self-contradictions in order to tailor it to their own beliefs, and thereby provide (scant) rationale for their actions.
In fact, I struggle to see what the mention of Jesus has to do with our exchange, though you have done me the great service of providing ample material for my continuing mirth.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : I am also struggling not to use the phrase "in fact". I only mention this as it seems irrelevance is the theme for the day. I'm glad you decided to come out and play - I had lost interest yesterday, and may well have forgotten all about taunting you here. It's a shame to pollute this page with my cerebral ejaculate, but I delight at the thought of you reading these posts and getting too miserable and depressed to waste energy on finding a woman to beat and subjugate.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@RobertsDigital : Of course, you've now validated this position by responding with such a humorous response (really; I actually laughed out loud, heartily).
I'm willing to bet a year's income that I've done more good, contributed more to charity, treated people more fairly, and have far more laudable morals than you despite my status as a heathen; and I know for sure that I've treated women better than you have...
...oh wait, sorry; have you even started growing hair yet? I presume too much.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@Cuteyoshigirl : I'm with you. Infants crushed to death in factory machinery was not uncommon during their eighteen-hour, seven-day weeks of work. Women legally forced into sexual slavery. Beating a woman after a certain hour was considered anti-social (noise laws). Starving your tenants to death was a good way of vacating under-paying properties. Beating your slaves was okay, so long as injury was not permanent (though it could be disfiguring). What a lovely, *respectful* world it was, eh?
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@Cuteyoshigirl The "I was beaten as a kid and it did me no harm" argument. Maybe in a lot of cases it doesn't but it certainly doesn't help a child learn respect, the only reason a child that is beaten behaves is out of fear not respect, there is a difference. That argument is only used by people who were beaten to justify it. Ok hows this for you "I wans't beaten as a child and did never did me any harm". My parents were against spanking and "whooping" I've turned out a decent person.
TheSolitaryHeart 5 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses : You could not be further from the truth. It was not until The Great War depleted working-class man-power that new-fangled ideas about basic human rights, good working conditions, and class- and gender- equality were to arise. Being low-born usually meant you stayed low, and you were lucky not to be treated like an animal worked to death in unsafe conditions. People thrived on the literal blood, sweat, and suffering of those beneath them.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses : ...so, great, yeah - we now have the right to treat everybody like shit and withhold respect from anybody we choose, rather than having it dictated by society at large. We can thank the fact that even our poorest are better off than those in developing countries who have now taken the place of our own 'untouchables'. We gave our people the right to humane treatment in their stead, and with it, the right to be scum by choice.
WhiteHawkUK 6 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses so true..
MovieTristan 6 months ago
@AbsintheGlasses People helped others more? Well consider that there was still child labour in the Western World at this time, slums in the East End of London and countless other cities across Europe, women didn't have the vote, gay people were sent to prison and given hard labour; it doesn't sound like a better world to me. I'm sure there were just as many disrespectful and anti-social people back then, it's just people don't appreiciate what age they are living in.
TheSolitaryHeart 5 months ago
This made me want to cry, in a good way! The hat-tipping, the family picnic, the elegant clothing, lively expressions. It feels like such a warm, familiar place to be.
Inkwish 10 months ago
3:21 jaajajajajajajajaja!!!!!!!!
talcualesinfinito 10 months ago
They could have at least filmed it in HD!! Jeez
HabitsofLife 10 months ago
Just spirits on a human journey ! don't take life to seriously... look at the baby(235) doing what babies do - this could be yesterday or 500 years ago. Thanks for sharing:)
ice484 10 months ago
Seems like only yesterday, thanks for the memories.
mikestheman3 10 months ago
It's really hard to belive that the little child at 2:32 probally are dead today.
TheBigGnome 10 months ago
@TheBigGnome probably? this was over 100 years ago lol
JoshcoProduction 10 months ago
@TheBigGnome If that baby lived a healthy and long life, if I could find that person , I could have brought that person in for my High school project about life in the early 1900's. My Project was done in 1985 when I was 15 and "the baby" at 2:32 could have explained life back to my class instead of me showing still black and white photographs. Yes, the child is definitely passed on now but he/she could have being still alive when I was a child myself ! Wow, that is amazing to thing about.
tofarx3me 10 months ago
3:10 origin of comedy
peterws2 10 months ago
To me, this is the kind of thing that makes film special, as an art form. Unlike books, music, theater, paintings, etc., which are merely representations and second-hand testimony, film actually allows us to see, first hand, worlds that we're never seen, and people who may not even be alive any more. A window into the past. Marvelous.
Ashiman12 10 months ago
I like the guys who tipped their hats and waved to the camera. Little did they know that the people who would see their gestures would be 100+ years in the future. Here we are in an electronic age, with computers, DVDs, video games, etc. and what are we doing? Looking back at the past. Our hats off to you, friendly strangers from the past!
Jeff98177 10 months ago 2
A valid point, but that's how it will always be. What made you think of that? Slightly random...
littlad 11 months ago
HAHAHA! Look at the dog who is scaring people away LOL! :D
capricorncoool 11 months ago
They are all in hell !
capricorncoool 11 months ago
it's kinda spooky knowing that all these people are dead now.
rocabear 11 months ago 48
@rocabear even the dog
angelsbeatlesfan 9 months ago
Comment removed
ucstudent2 8 months ago
@rocabear yeah.... :/
skating0813 7 months ago
@rocabear including the dog
juansus199 7 months ago
@rocabear who knows there are alot of 100+ people still, maybe 1 is still walking into shots when people are trying to film lol
SRNF 7 months ago
@rocabear Good to know Im not the only one who thought of that.
beckasha83 7 months ago
@rocabear Bullshit what makes you think that?
sclock2 7 months ago
@rocabear dannngg i was thinking the same thing while watching this video.
gokci 6 months ago
we did this in Uni today
OldNewsThinker 11 months ago
23 people think this will never catch on. :)
Shadders2010 11 months ago
4:32 - A train. Known in those days as the "horseless airplane."
Lookit how all the women dressed. No wonder nobody let them vote.
I kid, I kid.
6:01 - The work of Satan, caught on film.
Shadders2010 11 months ago
People engaging in that most popular of pasttimes in the late 19th Century: Exiting places.
"Dear, I'm bored. Let's go down to the museum and exit it."
"A fine idea. I'll fetch my coat."
"I'll bring the camera!"
Dig that father's mustache. And her clothes. It's a good thing this is silent film, cuz her clothes are too loud.
Also: That baby could be your great-grandfather. Think about that for a minute.
3:12 - Son's prank
3:23: Loving discipline, aka "beating the hell out of you."
Shadders2010 11 months ago
Everybody's wearing a hat. I hate hats :)
Quinzio 11 months ago
weres the HD option?
monster98012 11 months ago
OMG! where did you take this video?!
sasha3542 11 months ago