According to the "Official-Conspiracy-Theory,"flight 93 would nose-dive straight down,zoobanging itself right into the ground;completely vanishing into the abyss of the great hole it would create.Yeah!completely into the ground,well the large jet-air liner would then SPEW!itself up-n-out of the abyss;small bits-n-pieces STREWN eight miles across the Skanksville landscape.No-crap-scheirlock--this is what the FEDS would actually belay upon the dumbed-down public.Yeah,and alot of um believe it.Woah
The SOB was shot down. I knew it from the beginning. It probably should have been shot down as bad as a hate to say it. There should have at least been engines intact. Those things are tons and tons of titanium. They don't just "vaporize"! The two crashes in this video are not comparable.
Common sense says that no plane crashed there. Common sense also says, where are the wing marks on the Pentagon? It's not rocket science, it's just natural inquiry. I find it funny how debunkers seem to get upset when you put forth OBVIOUS questions that BEG answers. Just like a man caught in a lie who gets upset at you because you caught him in HIS lie. I never understood that about people.
People don't get upset because you "caught them" as you seem to think. They get upset because you spread rediculous things without taking the time to understand them. Common sense did not put satellites in space. If you want to understand why there are no large parts of debris from flight 93% or where the wing marks on the pentagon (there actually were depending on which pictures you are looking at, the conspiracy websites conveniently leave them out) then take the time to do some research.
The 757 crashed at over 540 MPH, making the impact so hard on the fuselage so hard that it broke up into small pieces. The Hawker 800 crashed at around 140 MPH, making it not as hard on the fuselage, making the body be more intact.
That's a bullshit claim. The max speed of a Boeing 757 is more than 540mph. It's over 600mph in fact. It's body and frame wouldn't have lost pieces in the air at a speed that it was built to perform. And even if it did, it would not have been as many pieces that were found scattered miles away or the plane wasn't inspected properly and shouldn't have been allowed to take off in the first place.
the only thing miles away were paper and insulation that would have risen in the air by the fire and then carried by the wind, large parts such as the engine were only a few hundred feet to 1000 feet away.
why does there have to be large parts to prove there was a plane that crashed there, not to mention they found both engines and there are several pictures of them digging up on of the engines, and multiple pictures of the hull Here's plenty of crash sites with small pieces of debris
911research . wtc7 . net / pentagon / analysis / compare / jetcrashdebris . h t ml
And they identified all of the passengers by DNA, the coroner found over 1500 body parts, and then there's the eyewitnesses.
It makes a difference whether a plane crashes at a relatively slow speed, such as taking off and landing, or a plane crashing at a high speed. The plane that crashed in PA was approach Mach 1 when it hit nearly nose down. Get a life and stop spreding lies to further your agenda.
Actually I have not been told anything about either incident. But I do know a little about physics, especially how it applies to aircraft. Also, the FAA considers me an expert on Hawkers.
My source for what? I didn't say anything that isn't true. Try reading again, but this time wipe the shit from your eyes, you've obviously spent too much time with your head up your ass.
You wrote what you thought is true. Posting profanity only weekens your argument. You suggested I need a new source. When I asked what is your source you responded, "source for what?" If your memory is that bad, I suggest laying off the mind altering substances long enough to write a coherent post. By the way, nobody likes a potty mouth.
danomanoi, if your statement is true, then how do u explain how titanium and steel(engines and wheel assemblies) were not found anywhere yet plastic arabic passports and nearly pristine bandanas of the supposed hijackers were found? How did these items survive the Mach 1 speed crash yet the steel did not?
I've seen pictures of landing gear and engine turbine wheels at the crash site.
It's an internet perpetuated myth that no aircraft parts where found. And by the way, throw a beer can in a small fire and see what's left after the ashes cool.
A beer can is aluminum, not steel or titanium. Provide links of these pictures, because as far as I know you're the only one who's ever seen such things.
@SeekNTruth: I can answer that. He and others like him, are living in the globalist media generated "alternate reality". Where was the "all powerful" U.S. military, as each of these planes flew off course? The fact that NONE of these planes were intercepted, alone, should be enough to answer any questions; but of course, the masses prefer NOT to think for themselves.
Imagine a car driving 75 mph into a wall what it would look like. Now imagine 500 mph. That was the speed of flight 93. 95% of the plane was recovered although much of it in small peices and burried. Makes sence being that the plane flew almost into the ground according to the many eyewitnesses who saw it. You also have many resue workers who found the parts and about 100 forensic scientists who's job it was to identify the remains. Try telling all those people that there was no plane.
buddha, please provide a vid of the "plenty of photos of the debris" as you say there are. A quick search on google shows mostly the empty crator. Where are the huge pieices?
If you got a "vid of the 'plenty of photos of the debris'" would it make one bit of difference? Or would you simply shift your argument to another, even more ludicrous proposition? In other words, do you think you can entertain or believe anything but what you have already decided to believe?
Absolutely, but until there is evidence(photos or vids of large debris such as wings, engines, wheel assemblies) my position stands just as yours does. Do you not find it odd that no large titanium and metal engine parts were found yet they found PLASTIC passports and COTTON bandanas of the supposed hijackers? Wow that jet fuel does amazing things, it melts and disintegrates steel but preserves plastic and clothing materials. NEW SCEINTIFIC DISCOVERY!! Wake Up debblouin!
According to the "Official-Conspiracy-Theory,"flight 93 would nose-dive straight down,zoobanging itself right into the ground;completely vanishing into the abyss of the great hole it would create.Yeah!completely into the ground,well the large jet-air liner would then SPEW!itself up-n-out of the abyss;small bits-n-pieces STREWN eight miles across the Skanksville landscape.No-crap-scheirlock--this is what the FEDS would actually belay upon the dumbed-down public.Yeah,and alot of um believe it.Woah
chuckolove 2 weeks ago
The SOB was shot down. I knew it from the beginning. It probably should have been shot down as bad as a hate to say it. There should have at least been engines intact. Those things are tons and tons of titanium. They don't just "vaporize"! The two crashes in this video are not comparable.
drake0074 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is this comparing like with like?
Blueyedblondeful 1 year ago
Common sense says that no plane crashed there. Common sense also says, where are the wing marks on the Pentagon? It's not rocket science, it's just natural inquiry. I find it funny how debunkers seem to get upset when you put forth OBVIOUS questions that BEG answers. Just like a man caught in a lie who gets upset at you because you caught him in HIS lie. I never understood that about people.
MassacreBlast 1 year ago
People don't get upset because you "caught them" as you seem to think. They get upset because you spread rediculous things without taking the time to understand them. Common sense did not put satellites in space. If you want to understand why there are no large parts of debris from flight 93% or where the wing marks on the pentagon (there actually were depending on which pictures you are looking at, the conspiracy websites conveniently leave them out) then take the time to do some research.
rroman3212 11 months ago
Plus, your a REAL looser
flyeroftheyear4444 3 years ago
The 757 crashed at over 540 MPH, making the impact so hard on the fuselage so hard that it broke up into small pieces. The Hawker 800 crashed at around 140 MPH, making it not as hard on the fuselage, making the body be more intact.
flyeroftheyear4444 3 years ago
Then explain why debris was found up to 8 MILES away from the crash site. Ohhh, you can't? Didn't think so.
corruptedsilence 3 years ago
Yeah, because when a plane goes that fast, and decending that fast, peices of it are torn off due to the G's pulled off.
flyeroftheyear4444 3 years ago
That's a bullshit claim. The max speed of a Boeing 757 is more than 540mph. It's over 600mph in fact. It's body and frame wouldn't have lost pieces in the air at a speed that it was built to perform. And even if it did, it would not have been as many pieces that were found scattered miles away or the plane wasn't inspected properly and shouldn't have been allowed to take off in the first place.
corruptedsilence 2 years ago
the only thing miles away were paper and insulation that would have risen in the air by the fire and then carried by the wind, large parts such as the engine were only a few hundred feet to 1000 feet away.
heafers84 2 years ago
heafers84, See, thats the problem, there were no large parts found.
SeekNTruth 2 years ago
why does there have to be large parts to prove there was a plane that crashed there, not to mention they found both engines and there are several pictures of them digging up on of the engines, and multiple pictures of the hull Here's plenty of crash sites with small pieces of debris
911research . wtc7 . net / pentagon / analysis / compare / jetcrashdebris . h t ml
And they identified all of the passengers by DNA, the coroner found over 1500 body parts, and then there's the eyewitnesses.
heafers84 2 years ago
Look, if you look at the radar tapes of this Hawker track, it lost over 75kts over a period of 3 seconds due to extreem windsheer.
The differance between the Boeing 757 and this Hawker is the speed of impact.
The Hawker was going missed, and was perhaps still in it's dirty config, which also softened the impact.
The Boeing 757 was traveling at a very high speed, when it impacted. As for the luggage, not many folks onboard...so not much luggage to find.
Stop posting this shit!
Tn272SP 3 years ago
Comment removed
corruptedsilence 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There were around 40 passengers on board according to reports. That's plenty of luggage to find.
High speed or not. There should have been more distinctive pieces to the plane left around.
40,000lb titanium engines wouldn't have just disintegrated....
corruptedsilence 2 years ago
i was there when the plane crashed, i was in cabbellas when it happend, it was scary..=00
(cabellas is about half a mile away from the accident
kittylov3r1 3 years ago
this is the biggest mystery of 911
kentan2202 3 years ago
It makes a difference whether a plane crashes at a relatively slow speed, such as taking off and landing, or a plane crashing at a high speed. The plane that crashed in PA was approach Mach 1 when it hit nearly nose down. Get a life and stop spreding lies to further your agenda.
danomanoi 3 years ago
That what you have been told. maybe you should get a life and stop taking everything at face value?
corruptedsilence 3 years ago
Actually I have not been told anything about either incident. But I do know a little about physics, especially how it applies to aircraft. Also, the FAA considers me an expert on Hawkers.
danomanoi 3 years ago
Of course you have, fool. You got your information from somewhere. I suggest a new source.
corruptedsilence 3 years ago
What is your source? The internet? Fool indeed.
danomanoi 2 years ago
My source for what? I didn't say anything that isn't true. Try reading again, but this time wipe the shit from your eyes, you've obviously spent too much time with your head up your ass.
corruptedsilence 2 years ago
You wrote what you thought is true. Posting profanity only weekens your argument. You suggested I need a new source. When I asked what is your source you responded, "source for what?" If your memory is that bad, I suggest laying off the mind altering substances long enough to write a coherent post. By the way, nobody likes a potty mouth.
danomanoi 2 years ago
danomanoi, if your statement is true, then how do u explain how titanium and steel(engines and wheel assemblies) were not found anywhere yet plastic arabic passports and nearly pristine bandanas of the supposed hijackers were found? How did these items survive the Mach 1 speed crash yet the steel did not?
SeekNTruth 2 years ago
I've seen pictures of landing gear and engine turbine wheels at the crash site.
It's an internet perpetuated myth that no aircraft parts where found. And by the way, throw a beer can in a small fire and see what's left after the ashes cool.
danomanoi 2 years ago
A beer can is aluminum, not steel or titanium. Provide links of these pictures, because as far as I know you're the only one who's ever seen such things.
corruptedsilence 2 years ago
@SeekNTruth: I can answer that. He and others like him, are living in the globalist media generated "alternate reality". Where was the "all powerful" U.S. military, as each of these planes flew off course? The fact that NONE of these planes were intercepted, alone, should be enough to answer any questions; but of course, the masses prefer NOT to think for themselves.
RandyBful1 1 year ago
Imagine a car driving 75 mph into a wall what it would look like. Now imagine 500 mph. That was the speed of flight 93. 95% of the plane was recovered although much of it in small peices and burried. Makes sence being that the plane flew almost into the ground according to the many eyewitnesses who saw it. You also have many resue workers who found the parts and about 100 forensic scientists who's job it was to identify the remains. Try telling all those people that there was no plane.
rroman3212 11 months ago
95 percent of Flight 93 was recovered at Shanksville including the black box. There are plenty of photos of the debris on the intenet.
buddhaglass 3 years ago
buddha, please provide a vid of the "plenty of photos of the debris" as you say there are. A quick search on google shows mostly the empty crator. Where are the huge pieices?
SeekNTruth 3 years ago
If you got a "vid of the 'plenty of photos of the debris'" would it make one bit of difference? Or would you simply shift your argument to another, even more ludicrous proposition? In other words, do you think you can entertain or believe anything but what you have already decided to believe?
debblouin 2 years ago
Absolutely, but until there is evidence(photos or vids of large debris such as wings, engines, wheel assemblies) my position stands just as yours does. Do you not find it odd that no large titanium and metal engine parts were found yet they found PLASTIC passports and COTTON bandanas of the supposed hijackers? Wow that jet fuel does amazing things, it melts and disintegrates steel but preserves plastic and clothing materials. NEW SCEINTIFIC DISCOVERY!! Wake Up debblouin!
SeekNTruth 2 years ago
Comment removed
corruptedsilence 3 years ago
Whoa, ghost plane, mirite?
I live in Owatonna btw.
TheHonald 3 years ago