the girl groups of the late 50's early 60's hold a special place in history.the music was in a class by itself.the Shirelles,Chiffons,Ronnettes,Angels,Young Sisters,Shangrala's,Toys,Cookies,Pony Tails,Blossoms,Marveletts,Chantels,Ribbons,Crystals and I know i've forgotten a bunch.they made some stay with ya tunes!
@jab3785 Very well said. The Beatles were very respectful of Carl Perkins, Larry Williams & The Isley Bros., to name a few. And they always did a hell of a job covering their songs. S Carino.
Regardless of who you think did the song better, one thing you have the respect about the Beatles is they always showed proper respect to the artists who inspired them.
Finally found the original. All my searches kept directing me to the Erasures? Terrible group. The Beatles helped kill American R&R. but they were a great band. I still prefer my oldies American style.
@arkyron1947 yeah they took us out of r&r and back to pop. their original stuff was much better. you tube and sirius/xm can keep you with more than enough 50's music
the fact that the Beatles covered the Cookies, the Shirelles, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Buddy Holly, Arthur Alexander, etc., helped to introduce my generation to American rocknroll and keep it alive.
@boneypart ; I was 16 when the Beatles arrived on scene.I thought they were great, but their style of R&R and other new groups music morphed into a sound I didn't care for. It's a personal taste not criticising other music.
I like the Beatles well enough, although some of the people who idol worship them are a bit weird. There are a few absolute masterpieces, some fantastic songs, a lot of good songs and a few pieces of utter crap (mostly Paul McCartney playing "granny music", or George Harrison's early attempts, or anything sung by Ringo). However, it's much better to hear the artists the songs were either written by, or in this case, written for, than just to hear the covers all the time.
I am a Beatles fan and a Cookies fan. The original is awesome. However The Beatles pay this song proper respect by keeping it simple and pretty much singing it as the girls did.
@bill012150 You are definitely alone. But luckily, I belong to the other side of the spectrum (: It would be a pity not to like a band which has had so much influence on other bands and made such great songs.
What a great song.
JimmySmithWesson 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
Way better then beatles version. Suck it.
JimmySmithWesson 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the girl groups of the late 50's early 60's hold a special place in history.the music was in a class by itself.the Shirelles,Chiffons,Ronnettes,Angels,Young Sisters,Shangrala's,Toys,Cookies,Pony Tails,Blossoms,Marveletts,Chantels,Ribbons,Crystals and I know i've forgotten a bunch.they made some stay with ya tunes!
nomiclas 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
nomiclas 2 weeks ago
I'm a Beatles fan but like the Cookies version better.
staff50ord 3 weeks ago
@jab3785 Very well said. The Beatles were very respectful of Carl Perkins, Larry Williams & The Isley Bros., to name a few. And they always did a hell of a job covering their songs. S Carino.
RadioCarino 1 month ago
Regardless of who you think did the song better, one thing you have the respect about the Beatles is they always showed proper respect to the artists who inspired them.
jab3785 1 month ago
Beatles did a good job but I like the ladys better!
thears2u 1 month ago
I like the Beatles loads but his just is better - a magnificent song
OFFTHEBUSH 1 month ago
oh yea How in hell i got to be an old man ???? mind is 1962 body is mummy
GK1918 1 month ago 4
i didn't know that the beatles paid for this song :o however i like this song...
rockaryboy 1 month ago
I'm here because my mom and my dad fucked together. Well, i guess.
Kdzification 1 month ago 4
Like the Beatles version much better. Maybe because I heard theirs first in '64 in England and it still reverberates in my brain. Thanks
etransform 1 month ago
@etransform
i'm 20, and i think it reverbates with so many beatles fans because it was georges first lead
OropherThranduil 1 month ago
classic, original Americana! Talent, not pretense or scripted acting-out to compensate for lack of vocal artistry.
rickserst 2 months ago
Lovely version. If Beatles got 100 points, this original should be at least 90. Sorry, but John's armonica is full good.
sagitario21122012 2 months ago
♪♪♪♪♪♪♥
Khultan 3 months ago
Didn't the cookies later become the Raelettes?
meinLiebsterFeind 3 months ago
Finally found the original. All my searches kept directing me to the Erasures? Terrible group. The Beatles helped kill American R&R. but they were a great band. I still prefer my oldies American style.
arkyron1947 3 months ago
@arkyron1947 yeah they took us out of r&r and back to pop. their original stuff was much better. you tube and sirius/xm can keep you with more than enough 50's music
denisjl100 3 months ago
@arkyron1947
How you can kill something what is dead already?
They just resurected it. But i do understand you: America's got everything best, kultivated taste and education especially.
Sinisa138 3 months ago
@arkyron1947
the fact that the Beatles covered the Cookies, the Shirelles, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Buddy Holly, Arthur Alexander, etc., helped to introduce my generation to American rocknroll and keep it alive.
boneypart 2 months ago 2
@boneypart ; I was 16 when the Beatles arrived on scene.I thought they were great, but their style of R&R and other new groups music morphed into a sound I didn't care for. It's a personal taste not criticising other music.
arkyron1947 2 months ago
@arkyron1947
Indeed music morphed into something I dont care for. I was 9 in '64. I had to go back to find out what you already knew.
boneypart 2 months ago
I like the Beatles well enough, although some of the people who idol worship them are a bit weird. There are a few absolute masterpieces, some fantastic songs, a lot of good songs and a few pieces of utter crap (mostly Paul McCartney playing "granny music", or George Harrison's early attempts, or anything sung by Ringo). However, it's much better to hear the artists the songs were either written by, or in this case, written for, than just to hear the covers all the time.
anonUK 4 months ago
@anonUK
There are many who disagree with your dismissals of Paul, George, and Ringo.
cheers
boneypart 2 months ago
I'm here because of the Beatles,.Sorry but it's true
JorTolentino 4 months ago 6
@JorTolentino So what.
Khultan 3 months ago
Love the girl groups.
69ssrszl1 4 months ago
The drum rolls are much stronger vs Ringo's lame rolls.
FecesHurlingMonkey1 4 months ago
I actually like this version better than the Beatles' version. However, the Sax overpowers what essentually is an accoustic piece with Female voices.
Armydicked 5 months ago
@Armydicked THis is not folk music We liked to dance not sit and protest
mybosco30 3 months ago
Great harmony... Very pleasant to listen. Thanx. Far-away big smile.
ildibildi53 6 months ago
I am a Beatles fan and a Cookies fan. The original is awesome. However The Beatles pay this song proper respect by keeping it simple and pretty much singing it as the girls did.
TheDutchgirl52 6 months ago 16
love this memory!
cynthia6637 7 months ago
I'm not a Beatles fan...at all. I have been looking for the original version for a long time.
Great tune!
peasead 7 months ago
I guess you and I are the only two people in the world who don't like the beatles...at all. Nice to know I'm not alone!
bill012150 5 months ago
@bill012150 three. count me in too.
unity100 4 months ago
@bill012150 You are definitely alone. But luckily, I belong to the other side of the spectrum (: It would be a pity not to like a band which has had so much influence on other bands and made such great songs.
albuorkka 4 months ago
..THANKS ...I HEARD THIS FIRST SUNG BY 'THE EVERLY BROTHERS' THEN BY 'THE BEATLES' AND THAN THIS ORIGINAL VERSION.....LUF THE SONG THOUGH..
ERIK TIELMAN, FLORIDADADAAA
tickyreal 9 months ago