@1thruZ i`m chinese and i dont think china is committed to captalism, it`s more of pragmaticism. and the chinese gov doesnt do all the spending by the way, the private sector has occupied at least 70 percent of china`s GDP.
China;s increase as more to do with the deturgent from Western COuntries from their priciples of freedom and a true free market, than with China itself
...of course, BHO is so incredibly smart and talented the only thing he'd done before guilty white liberal US voters gave him a mulligan into the WH, was to write a book about how great he is.
"where we naturally belong"........China's embrace of market ideology does not equal its embrace of Western free market ideology but more so of pragmatism separating truth from facts in how theory operates in reality. Also, Chinese culture for a few millennia have had a strong cultural sense of its commerce, trade etc. etc. why else are Chinese businesses all over the world on average quite successful. Also for the past 20 centuries, China has been on top economically for at least 15 of them!
i usually respect ferguson's opinions, but his opinion on this one about the chinese is unfounded.....what they hv is socialism not capitalism and starting a business in china isn't easy.
it's similar to Taiwan, they have a dual track economy, one highly competitive and entirely privatized, the other is state-controlled strategic key industries. It's socialism with chinese characteristics.
@nocompunctions every thing that is made in China is made by foreign companies who have set up businesses in China - Apple Ipads etc. China is state capitalist. By 2020 China will become the largest market for luxury goods. The members of the Communist party buy BMWs & Mercedes Benzs and build large mansions. Everything that socialists - hate China is.
Notice all the White Monkeys sitting next to him suddenly Jerk up when Niall mentions, "Western Dominance" and "Rightful Position". Stupid white pigs.
And CHINA is now the World Leader in Renewable Energy Manufacturing.
Senator Obama during the 2008 Prez Election literally said- the Country that becomes the leader in Renewable Energy will be the Global Economic Leader.
At the time in 2008 & 2009, China wanted NOTHING to do with it. Then got serious, saw how right Obama was and are NOW the world's leader.
When journalist asked Obama about it, he said, they have a Command Based Leadership & don't have to fight congress to get it done.
I think it depends on what kind of energy sector u'r talking about. In some yes, in others not.
I also disagree with your insinuation that decentralized-based leaderships can't get serious about renewable energy...most of the countries that produce the most amt. of renewable energy are democracies
@saugeen3000 democracies yes, just different manifestations of democracies which the current form that USA has (which I personally would argue is plutonic and not democratic AT ALL) cannot. I would also argue that culture overrides political systems and it forms the basis of how political arenas of different countries operate. Had China been put through Western democracy, it would've messed up
I think Niall is right about somethings and wrong about others... but he is DEAD SET RIGHT about this. And the American Piece of the global pie is gonna shrink as China and India get stronger. IT's a FACT of life.
But NO US politician can say this FACT without being SLAUGHTERED. We all have to listen to sarah palin with her pom poms talk about how Jesus blessed the USA... or how Jesus blessed only the real Americans living in the REAL Parts of the Real America.
@stone34 Something that is extremely unfortunate for the American people I must say. Sigh and zz at Sarah Palin. From the viewpoint of a New Zealander, how the fuck did that joke ever become the running mate of the Republican's frontrunner for President. Matt Damon was fully right on this point.
@overcastingasshole- As an American I agree with you about palin. There are NOT enough negative words in the English Language to describe her. But I will use just one... INSIGNIFICANT. She really is that.
Your giving her too much credit to say she's a front runner. She's NOT. She will NEVER run because she will have to take on Negative attacks from other Repubs. She will have to do interviews & be accountable for her LACK of KNOWLEDGE & Stupidity. She'll NEVER subject herself to that TRUTH
@overcastingasshole- Shes a carnival barker & Could NEVER Win the General Election. Shes dispised by about 60-70% of Americans. Sure she got rich, has her little following that makes noice but could NEVER win. She has ZERO credibility, is caught lying or butchering facts / history everytime she speaks. Oddly that makes her more popular with her SMALL group of ignorant fanatics.
She has a lil power in getting her group to back another Repub in the primary but thats it.
I don't get how China is more committed to capitalism. Their gov't does all the spending.
1thruZ 3 months ago
@1thruZ i`m chinese and i dont think china is committed to captalism, it`s more of pragmaticism. and the chinese gov doesnt do all the spending by the way, the private sector has occupied at least 70 percent of china`s GDP.
metameros 2 months ago
Ferguson is one of the few economists who speaks the truth. Unfortunately arrogant western politicians are not listening to him. We need a revolution
Reido2828 3 months ago
China;s increase as more to do with the deturgent from Western COuntries from their priciples of freedom and a true free market, than with China itself
jccusell 3 months ago
...of course, BHO is so incredibly smart and talented the only thing he'd done before guilty white liberal US voters gave him a mulligan into the WH, was to write a book about how great he is.
bcfsl 6 months ago
"where we naturally belong"........China's embrace of market ideology does not equal its embrace of Western free market ideology but more so of pragmatism separating truth from facts in how theory operates in reality. Also, Chinese culture for a few millennia have had a strong cultural sense of its commerce, trade etc. etc. why else are Chinese businesses all over the world on average quite successful. Also for the past 20 centuries, China has been on top economically for at least 15 of them!
overcastingasshole 7 months ago
@LORDMCHUGH
hahaha pig.
kludge11 10 months ago
i usually respect ferguson's opinions, but his opinion on this one about the chinese is unfounded.....what they hv is socialism not capitalism and starting a business in china isn't easy.
nocompunctions 11 months ago
@nocompunctions
it's similar to Taiwan, they have a dual track economy, one highly competitive and entirely privatized, the other is state-controlled strategic key industries. It's socialism with chinese characteristics.
Phead128 10 months ago
Comment removed
RedTyphoon1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nocompunctions every thing that is made in China is made by foreign companies who have set up businesses in China - Apple Ipads etc. China is state capitalist. By 2020 China will become the largest market for luxury goods. The members of the Communist party buy BMWs & Mercedes Benzs and build large mansions. Everything that socialists - hate China is.
RedTyphoon1 4 months ago
Notice all the White Monkeys sitting next to him suddenly Jerk up when Niall mentions, "Western Dominance" and "Rightful Position". Stupid white pigs.
kludge11 11 months ago
@kludge11
Yeah, I noticed that too. LOL!!!!!
Phead128 11 months ago
@kludge11 what a racist rant
nocompunctions 11 months ago
This White person finally gets it.
kludge11 11 months ago
if the only thing you're ever good at is stealing from others then you will inevitably decline when those you steal from get more powerful than you.
thewiffenpoof 11 months ago
The USA with it's extensive farm, industry subsidies and state controlled military industrial complex is more socialist than people realise...
INSERTNAMEHEREMAN 1 year ago 2
And CHINA is now the World Leader in Renewable Energy Manufacturing.
Senator Obama during the 2008 Prez Election literally said- the Country that becomes the leader in Renewable Energy will be the Global Economic Leader.
At the time in 2008 & 2009, China wanted NOTHING to do with it. Then got serious, saw how right Obama was and are NOW the world's leader.
When journalist asked Obama about it, he said, they have a Command Based Leadership & don't have to fight congress to get it done.
stone34 1 year ago
@stone34
I think it depends on what kind of energy sector u'r talking about. In some yes, in others not.
I also disagree with your insinuation that decentralized-based leaderships can't get serious about renewable energy...most of the countries that produce the most amt. of renewable energy are democracies
saugeen3000 11 months ago
@saugeen3000 democracies yes, just different manifestations of democracies which the current form that USA has (which I personally would argue is plutonic and not democratic AT ALL) cannot. I would also argue that culture overrides political systems and it forms the basis of how political arenas of different countries operate. Had China been put through Western democracy, it would've messed up
overcastingasshole 7 months ago
this is seriously starting to irk me, dailybeast. post these discussions/interviews in full! what's with all the cock teasing?
nubbs 1 year ago
Hits it on the nose. China, like the old USSR are closer to state capitalists than they are communists.
MilanTbay 1 year ago
@MilanTbay
I think Niall is right about somethings and wrong about others... but he is DEAD SET RIGHT about this. And the American Piece of the global pie is gonna shrink as China and India get stronger. IT's a FACT of life.
But NO US politician can say this FACT without being SLAUGHTERED. We all have to listen to sarah palin with her pom poms talk about how Jesus blessed the USA... or how Jesus blessed only the real Americans living in the REAL Parts of the Real America.
stone34 1 year ago 2
@stone34 Something that is extremely unfortunate for the American people I must say. Sigh and zz at Sarah Palin. From the viewpoint of a New Zealander, how the fuck did that joke ever become the running mate of the Republican's frontrunner for President. Matt Damon was fully right on this point.
overcastingasshole 7 months ago
@overcastingasshole- As an American I agree with you about palin. There are NOT enough negative words in the English Language to describe her. But I will use just one... INSIGNIFICANT. She really is that.
Your giving her too much credit to say she's a front runner. She's NOT. She will NEVER run because she will have to take on Negative attacks from other Repubs. She will have to do interviews & be accountable for her LACK of KNOWLEDGE & Stupidity. She'll NEVER subject herself to that TRUTH
stone34 7 months ago
@overcastingasshole- Shes a carnival barker & Could NEVER Win the General Election. Shes dispised by about 60-70% of Americans. Sure she got rich, has her little following that makes noice but could NEVER win. She has ZERO credibility, is caught lying or butchering facts / history everytime she speaks. Oddly that makes her more popular with her SMALL group of ignorant fanatics.
She has a lil power in getting her group to back another Repub in the primary but thats it.
Damon was RIGHT!
stone34 7 months ago
1st
orion1954 1 year ago