jim conley commited the murder he had a criminal background and he had a motive and an opprotunity to commit this crime. Leo frank was not liked by the people of the town since he was a jew. Jim conley assualted mary phagen and tried to pin it on the nightwatch man when that failed he then fabricated a story about leo franks having an intrest in mary phagen which was very clever on his part since everyone in the town disliked leo franks had franks been an anglo protestant conley would have hung.
I want to thank all of the anti-Semitic bigots who've commented here. It is for that reason and that reason alone that this past summer my youth theatre company took on the very difficult musical, Parade, composed by Jason Robert Brown and written by Alfred Uhry--two more of those "evil, plotting, manipulative Jews" you all are so scared of. (Give me a break!) Parade is about the Leo Frank case. We did the show to educate people against the garbage that so many of you are spewing here!
@suejvin and all the people telling the truth want to thank you for bringing attention to the Frank case, because when people search on the keyword leo frank on Internet search engines, they are going to learn the truth about him. One hundred years of lies about the Frank case are coming to an end. The truth wins out in the end always.
@gotch09 LOL! Thanks gotch09. Didn't think I'd have a "fan club" over this, but maybe we should form one. We'll call it "Intelligent Internet Users Against Bigoted Idiots."
No the Georgia Jury got it right......Leo Frank was the murderer. Just read the transcripts........check it out yourself. Mary Phagan's family got justice.
It needs to be understood that one day, perhaps even generations from now, the name of Leo Frank will be cleared. This in no way suggests that it should be or he was not utterly guilty of the MONSTROUS crime he committed. Rather it is an observation on the relentless persistence of jewish racial advocacy. A lie repeated long enough will eventually find a foothold. It is not fitting that those who are to be held up as a "light unto the nations" should have hands sullied by a child's blood.
It seems to dumb of a "plot" to have been from the mind of someone with above average intelligence and seems to be from mind of someone with IQ of 60-80.The janitor claimed he couldn't read/write when first questioned but when presented with his own handwriting from other sources admitted to and then claimed was paid $200 by frank to write and blame watchman and to make seem girl wrote while being murdered(huh?). A cleaning boy made a death bed confession in 70's he saw janitor with marys body.
@vfuturist The safe where he kept the checks was large enough that when the door was open a person could be hidden behind it. It's argued by his defense that she came in while he was working in the safe.
@calibabe85 the 4ft tall safe didn't stop anyone else that day, from coming into Leo Frank's office to get their pay envelope, why should it have stopped 5'2" Monteen Stover, who actually said she waited inside Leo Frank's empty office for 5 full minutes from 12:05 to 12:10PM. In response, to Monteen Stover saying his office was completely empty, Leo Frank said he might have "unconsciously" gone to the bathroom in the metal room. The place where all the forensic evidence of Mary Phagan's murder.
@vfuturist So he has a poor choice of words,I'm sure you don't consciously think every single time you are going to the restroom,you just do it.It's natural so therefore it's unconsciously done.And why have you no argument for anything else everyone is pointing out?You keep claiming "forensic evidence" but the type of "forensic evidence" they had back then was pretty much a joke.Why don't you say anything about the boy that saw Jim carrying Marys body and then threatened to kill him if he told?
@calibabe85 read the 1,800 page Georgia Supreme Court case file on Leo Frank, the evidence sustains Leo Frank's guilt. Until you read the 1,800 page georgia supreme court case file on Leo Frank you can not make any educated statements about his innocence or guilt.
Those pieces of evidence were not tested, which is on record as well. The blood was not tested, the hair was not tested, and if counting what Leo Frank said about Newt Lee was the one bit of "absolute truth" you think is correct, what about all the other people who fabricated stories, including Conley, at the drop of a hat. Sorry, but the reenacting of the scene, put into the timeline, speaks the loudest. As does the handwriting "analysis", albeit not professional, done by Smith of the notes.
All the forensic evidence was in the Metal Room on the second floor, down the hall from Leo Frank's office. Mary Phagan's hair was found on the handle of the lathe in the metal room, so was a big fat blood stain on the floor in front of the lady's dressing room. Leo Frank on Sunday, said Newt Lee's time card was punched perfectly, on Monday he said Newt Lee's time card was missing punches in 3 places. Leo Frank tried to pin the crime on an honest nightwatchman.
@vfuturist The didn't have DNA testing back then, there's no proof that it was Mary's hair. All they could determine was it was female because it was long, and happened to be the same color of Mary. With the amount of girls that worked in that factory there's not telling now who's hair it was.
Look at the forensic evidence; the man was not guilty. Juries find people not guilty today for less compelling reasons, even if the forensics points the other way. Our jury system is supremely fallible because of this. And Frank's jury was continually being shown people who were paid by newspapers or unethical private detectives to give a story. The newspapers themselves hold a great deal of culpability in this case.
@anneteacherful every level of the united states justice system looked at the case and found that the evidence was overwhelming against Leo Frank. Why don't you read the Brief of Evidence on the case? Leo Frank made a virtual murder confession when he said he "unconsciously" went to the bathroom in the metal room to explain why his office was empty between 12:05 and 12:10.
While I don't necessarily believe his sentence was commuted for the right reasons (because when does that ever happen?), looking at all the evidence, I can't see how he could have been guilty. And the legal system still sucks, and did more back then, so people are punished for things they don't do a lot, so it is odd his case gets so much attention. But bottom-line, if you lay it all out and look at it deeply enough, it becomes really difficult to believe he could have possibly been guilty.
@vfuturist I have read and studied this case. EVERYTHING was circumstantial and "he said she said" evidence. There has been many more testimonies of people since this, plus evidence that was never allowed into court that proves Leo didn't do it.
Before the Civil War, there was not that much hostility in the South toward Jews. Not that many Jews were there. Northern Jews were considered an asset by the Confederacy for trading with the South during the war. Union generals Grant and Sherman regarded them as a problem – for illegally trading with the enemy. When Jews came south as carpetbaggers after the war, southern hostility grew.
Blessings for the memory of Leo Frank, murdered by the gentiles. What of the girl? What is it, truly, one little shiksa slut? For that dog, a J-w should hang????!! It is blasphemy and still carried on to this day. Let the memory of this trespass against G-d's people never diminish!
@jewsaregreat23 You are truly an idiot, if somebody kills another person they deserve death, black white filipino, WHATEVER. I really hope for the sake of the Jews that you are not truly a person who exists out in the real world. Gods people, where was your god for the holocaust? where was your god for the hundreds of pogroms that have happened to you throughout the years? I think you and every other Jew out in the world has to stop with this sanctimonious bullshit. You are merely a smug mortal.
@leoothelip We don't all deliver sanctimonious bullshit. I apologize for "jewsaregreat23," but don't lump all of us together with her. If you do, you're as bad as she is.
@jewsaregreat23 Damn! As one to another, I'm embarrassed that you're Jewish. Are you serious?!!! You call this little girl who worked in the pencil company for pennies an hour a "shiksa slut"? You call her a "dog"? You're an extremist who gives the rest of us a bad name.
Why is Atlanta city government allowing BUCKHEAD BASEBALL to VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF "UNDESIRABLES" BY KICKING THEM OUT OF A CITY OF A ATLANTA PUBLIC PARK??? ChrisCrossdresser was SURROUNDED & BLOCKED by a group of angry white men when he DARED to walk on the public sidewalk in a city of Atlanta park! He felt like LEO FRANK being surrounded by a LYNCH MOB! Please YouTube 'Buckhead Baseball' to read all the comments. The AJC didn't consider the harassment "news worthy.
How can anyone with any scintilla of intelligence living in the 21st century still believe that Leo Frank was guilty? He was INNOCENT by virtue of irrefutable historical fact and posthumously pardoned by the state of Georgia in 1986.
@rmamches I've read that the trial judge later said he wasn't convinced of Franks guilt but he felt very intimidated by the mindset at the time. THE TRIAL JUDGE QUESSTIONED FRANKS GUILT.Plus Conleys lawyer, Mr. Smith, went on to work to prove Frank innocent. This trial had serious problems.
@gotch09 If the trial Judge doubted Leo Frank's guilt, why did he sentence Leo Frank to die on his 30th birthday, April 17, 1914. Would a doubting judge sentence someone to die on their birthday.
@gotch09 can you show me a reliable source not written by a Jewish supremacist, that shows the judge admitted he was intimidated by Mob Rule and feared for his as, because that sounds like a total fabrication of lies.
@gotch09 Leo Frank made a virtual murder confession on August 18, 1913, at his trial. Do a search on Leo Frank murder confession and you will finally learn the truth. Leo Frank confessed to murdering Mary Phagan at his own trial.
@WINGTV9 Obviously you know very little about the Talmud or most likely any religious scripture for that reason. This is not the place to spew your hatred of Jews and/or any other ethnic groups.
@mightyoak11111 The Talmud is pretty much pure evil, as Elizabeth Dilling's book, THE PLOT AGAINST CHRISTIANITY, reveals. The popes who had it burned did so with exceedingly good reason. There is probably no body of writing more vile than the Talmud.
@WINGTV9 (Wikipedia ) Anti-Talmud accusations have a long history dating back to the 13th century when the associates of the Inquisition attempted to defame Jews and their religion The early material compiled by hateful preachers like Raymond Martini and Nicholas Donin remain the basis of all subsequent accusations against the Talmud. Some are true, most are false and based on quotations taken out of context, and some are total fabrications.
@WINGTV9 Based on your other comments on other channels, it is obvious to Youtube viewers that you simply use this as a vehicle to spew antiSemitic and bigoted remarks. I feel sorry for you.
@Dabayare If you look at the history of the civil rights struggle in the US. For a long time, Jews and Blacks fought side by side. Jews have traditionally been advocates for equal rights in this country. Of course, there will always be those who were bigots just like there are in every ethnics group, black, white, and asian. Remember, the KKK and many other hate groups, hate Jews just as much as they do Blacks. There should be more collaboration and empathy between the two groups.
@mightyoak11111 I grew up down south so I know what you say is true. The Klans triage of hate was Blacks, Jews and Catholics. Oh and they didn't like Italians and "commies" either.
@WINGTV9 It is sad how u must resort to defamation and religious bigotry when adding a comment here. You are, in part, why there continues to be so much hate in this world.
I'm doing the Leo Frank case for my book review for my US History class. No one knows about this case, and being a Jew from my mother's side and my entire Father's family being from the South this case hits home for me.
From having lived and worked in the Marietta area, I have no doubt that there are heirs of prominent, powerful families in that community who have worked for 100 years, and continue to work to supress the truth in this case. In many ways, what passed for "justice" 100 years ago is still the prevailing standards in North Georgia. Many believe that the victory of the yankees in the Civil War is a nasty rumor.
I am sure there are classes for enthusiasts and for those who are just curious... Even if you are not jewish. But don't expect it to be a simple manual... It takes decades to learn this stuff properly
and them politicians who paid off that black man who testified against frank, he murdered that christian girl to bring a Jew hating incident and get the Jews of USA to support them banker criminals. the family of those in government then are still in government, and I bet you they also own banks as a reward for orchestrating this incident. go investigate all this and you find out I am right. it is a scheme only a person who is well aware of who and what the criminals in power are. human is beast
You are nothing but an evil person and I can prove it. First that is a lie. Secondly, whatever you call yourself Moslem or Christian, you care for no human. This murder was in 1913, the banker drug lord gangsters wanted to take control of USA money printing and banking. The lynching of a Jew convinced other Jews in USA and the world to join these criminals and support their overtaking of USA money printing rights; and The Federal Reserve Bank of New York came into power. Jews killing Jews for $.
Liberals in the South were responsible for this crime. It was motivated by class warfare. They used a black man (sort of the Obama of his time) to persecute a Jewish businessman and kill him on the false allegation of child molestation (guilty until proven innocent). The communist left of its day typified by the Democratic Party and the "Populist" movement lynched the unfortunate Jew and then formed the racially divisive Ku Klux Klan (a working class organization filled with union members).
The movie showing Frank was guilty or lied to the cops. I know some cops are corrupt and Frank did not say he did not know that girl. How could he say that when she was working in his factory? As for people who come and are false witnesses, many such people.
Oh yes, because every biggot is a Christian southerner, and every Christian southerner is a biggot.
Your statement is TOTALLY not as ignorant as the assumption that all Jews are money grubbing murderers. Nope, you're a real paragon of open-mindedness and tolerance.
Good thing there were never massive anti-black riots in places like Boston or Chicago, or major anti-Christian racist organizations who adhere to Nazi philosophy because that would totally throw a wrench in your logic.
the supreme court is not allowed to re-visit the facts, if you are screwed by a lower court only a mistake of law will help you.... His conviction was about as rightful as the mob that lynched him
Yes, we all know. The Jew must be innocent. To hell with the facts, the evidence, the testimony. Boy, those Rosenberg's really got shafted...Son of Sam too. He was guilty, and the "mob" were actually people who were cheated out of justice by NY Jew money. That's why they took the law into their own hands. Read the facts.
The only witness they had was the man who evidence (both admitted and otherwise) pointed to as a real killer.. A prosecutor with political ambitions hoisted on the shoulder of a jubilant mob after a case filled with so much miscarige of justice, no judge today would allow it.... So you are an antisemite, you don't like the Jews. I am sure the internet is filled with scum like you, who share your opinion about Jew money and Jew influence. But don't bullshit... I know this case well enough
This was the point in history where the Jew declared war on the Southern White Christian. Since then they have backed every black revolutionary, and every black organization. There they were, NY Jews marching in Selma, when there were enough roaches and rats in Harlem (their own back yard) to last a lifetime. But here they are, trying to blame the murder on a black guy. Poor saps.
For a moment there I thought you were actually concerned with some notion of justice. I guess you are nothing more than a biggot. you have no moral ground to stand on... You don't know the history of the very place you live and you blame all your problems on anyone who is remotely different. The Jew did not "declare war on the Souther White Christian", the Jew simply follows the teachings of judiasms, the refusal to sit still while somone is being treated unfairly.
Don't make me laugh. Most Jews don't even try to follow the ten commandments, much less try to get justice for others. They'll use others to do their fighting - that's about it - and that's what's going on right now with the American involvement in Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.
oh a conspiracy theory nut who happens to be an anti-semite white southern christian.. no wonder you hate jews so much, you probably never even met one.... and when they are not busy raping girls and getting america to invade coutnries, they drink the blood of the innocent... your rhetoric is so old and comical, its friggin annoying...
That's your only recourse. Because all you had to begin with was the absurd comment that Jews are interested in justice and that's why they're resurrecting the Leo Frank case. What a laugh. As if Frank's Jewishness had nothing to do with it. Most Jews are atheists, and wouldn't know the Talmud if they tripped over it. The cat's out of the bag. The boy has cried "Wolf!" too many times. It's over, ye schlepp. Time to start saying, "Excuse me, my fault"...etc.
how is a jew controlled hollywood make this movie that clearly shows the jew did it? because the banker gangsters Federal Reserve Bank is behind it all. to remind jews to support them or else this can happen to them again. they are behind this incident as well to get support from Jews to take over the printing power of this country's money. They killed 2 presidents and threatened many more to achieve this. The family of those in power did the lynching still in government and I bet own banks.
Tendentiousness and conjecture. The question you should ask, is,why is this case being brought up again after 100 years? Frank was guilty, the governor was bought off. The people couldn't get justice through the courts, (and they let it run through trial, appeal and Supreme Court), so they took it upon themselves to deliver justice. The governor left the state immediately - abdicated, never to return to political office.
This movie was made to remind Jews how ignorant the masses of the world are and how a murderer can be the witness. The politicians involved in the lynching, their family is still in government. Go check who is in charge of the banks in that state. The Federal Reserve wanted to come into power and get assistance from Jews and the governments of the state; this was a perfect set up to get the federal reserve to be put in power a few years later.
Do you just make this stuff up? The people were within their rights to lynch him. And there was no prejudice at all in those days against Jews. Protestants were more friendly toward Jews than they were Catholics. But Frank's attorney tried to blame it on an innocent (though not upstanding) black guy. Live with it.
WHere do you get this information. Jews did not have the right to stay in certain hotels or have certain jobs. They were considered greedy and lets not forget everyone favorite joke "I jewed him down" meaning I got him to give me a better price
This is unarguable. You hear one side of it - the side you like. Find all the original documents and then make your decision. Stop listening to your friends.
one son of sam pleaded guilty. Two Mrs. Ethel rosenberg had nothing to do with it. It ws her husband her brother and their friends of course they were in her house. What facts do you go by the one you make up in your head.
@grobo11 - So you want to re-try the case? Why? Because he was a Jew? Wow. That's a fair approach. He was convicted and condemned to death. The Georgia Governor was either bribed or ordered by his Masonic superiors to commute his sentence to life in prison - it was the governor's last official act before he bolted from the state. Nevertheless, he was given a trial and found guilty. To reopen it is no more malicious than to try to reopen the Dreyfus case.
Elicit sympathy? An innocent man was condemned, then lynched. And the people who did it remained quiet until their deaths. Only in the past few years have the survivors of the mob members spoken about it, including a man named Chuck Clay. He was a Georgia state legislator and his uncle was a lyncher.
I don't believe Leo Frank was innocent. Remember in the south at that time, a black man was still considered "lower" than a white Jewish man. Even a young boy came forward to say the young woman, Mary, who was murdered was afraid of Leo Frank because he was trying to touch her in an inappropriate manner. The Jews own the media today and are trying to re-write history as another poster said on another video about this case. The southern whites would condemn a black man before they would a Jew.
Jonlga, this is a clear cut case of a well-to-do man, regardless of his ethnic background, thinking he's above the law. It's very obvious from the trial transcripts I have read he was guilty. The people who lynched him were wrong. They should have been punished. I speak the truth when I say the Jewish people control the media and Hollywood. Many people in Hollywood feel that Roman Polanski should have his charges dropped. Would they feel that way if his name was Father Roman Polanski?
Lakme, that's hogwash. Frank was guilty as charged. The lynching was wrong. I agree with that. No one should take the law into their own hands. Why didn't Conley break down on the stand? He was grilled for hours by experienced attorneys. This was a blow to the defense. Frank thought his money could get him off. People were bribed and afraid. This is a typical example of wealthy elites exploiting the poor and less educated. Perhaps one day all 3 bodies will be exhumed; DNA will point to Frank.
Conley killed the girl. Most murderers have no conscience and can pass the lie detector test and lie a thousand miles an hour. You need to know what evil is about. And them cops lies. The whole thing was a hate crime and pre planned. She was murdered on purpose to blame Frank. Maybe his rich uncle was trying to go into politics.
@vfuturist there was saw dust found in Mary's lungs though, which was found down in the basement where she was found dead. Also Jim claims to have defecated in the elevator shaft earlier that day, then he claimed Leo and he took the elevator down to hide Mary's body. Yet when the police looked down the elevator shaft the feces were still in tact, meaning the elevator never went down......
@hawkedge there was a night watchman who seen everything but he was to afraid to speak at the time. On his death bead he opened up and and confessed that he had seen kill the little girl. All the evidence pointed to Conley all along. Leo frank wasn't a wealthy man. He was just the guy who handed out checks at a pencil factory. This trial is an example of how the media's influence can turn Corrupt a trial. A perfect example today would be the O J trial.
I have actually been to Mary Phagan's grave. She's buried in the Marietta City Cemetery in Marietta, Georgia, about an hour from my house. And I have NO DOUBT whatsoever...that Jim Conley killed her when he was drunk. Not Leo Frank. Frank's crime was being a Northern Jew in 1913 Atlanta.
i've done research for way longer than five minutes on this. it's not like i would make up the things i found out. and yeah, there is a ton of antisemitism on here and it's bullshit. it's also a big reason why people in georgia back then didn't believe his testimony.
the evidence i've read about doesn't point to frank. maybe you should look it up again.
You're not going to change their minds. They have this incredible belief that is bound up in religious or political zealotry and that does not allow them to consider other points of view.
They don't want to conside OPV because that might lead them to question their own beliefs and values. It's hard for people to do that because it might mean they were wrong.
Ted Bundy was not Jewis. BTK was, I believe, a deacon in his church.Carla Faye Tucker found God while on death row. She was a Christian whjo became born again after her death sentence.
Jeffrey Dahmer, The Green River Killer, The Boston Strangler, etc, etc, etc, were all non Jews.
Nobody is infallible. There was a reasonable doubt about whether or not he committed this murder and the state gave a pardon for it in 1986.
The Jew you refer to as far as I know were wastching the events with binoculars and recording. Muslims in Bat Ridge Brooklyn aas well as Patterson NJ were dancing like many on the West bank.
One of the two did it. Are you going to blame it on the black guy just because you want the jew to be innocent? Maybe they should have let Son of Sam go - blame it a black guy. No - look at the evidence - there's a whole lot of it.
if you look at the evidence, he probably wasn't guilty. the crime scene was trashed, there was some blood there that wasn't tested, and jim conley changed his story three times. The governor wasn't bought out. the jury probably was.
and "2040whitemniority", it is never ok to lynch someone. ever. and just because prominent people were in the lynch mob doesn't mean they were right in thinking that he was guilty.
Look at the evidence? You must be kidding. This went on for two years. You've given it about 5 minutes and you think you have the answer? There was no doubt about his guilt. The judge commuted his death sentence to life - that's why they stormed the jail and lynched him. But there was never any doubt about his guilt. The governor was bought off. Sheesh. The NY Times was involved in this case and it took place in Marietta Georgia. Yeah, yeah...jealousy, anti-semitism, that's all you've got.
@bammbamm12 I know Jews have a lousy anti-semitic tick to call it out unanimously, a guilt disorder be it. But the think with them is they truly appreciate the sanctity of a life and a death, just like Christians. Maybe bigotry is innate. Or maybe whites have a broader hand to deal it, when Gabrielle Giffords got shot last week a bunch of lunatics like you had the nerve to say it was a Jew who did it! Just to get the old blood boiling for some good old fashioned Jew bashing!
Leo Frank was guilty. He was lynched because the people knew that the Governor was bought off by NY (Jew) money, to commute his sentence from death to life in prison. (I doubt they'll tell you that). The Governor then abdicated and skipped town. Yes, the people were after him too. Ask yourselves this though: If it was the black guy, Jim Conley, who was really guilty, why did the southern whites prefer to convict a white guy? Frank was guilty - that's why.
@bammbamm12 You have the keen approach to solving mysteries of a private eye dont you bambam. Its funny how noble of you to call Jews white, but in the same sentence refer to them in a totally different entity. Truth is you have an appalling bias towards Jews even though you know how the game works. You know Jews are conned into disreputable positions and talked down upon, especially in the bible belt of all places. Jew money? Conolly admitted to this crime on his dead bed.
@bammbamm12 "If it was the black guy, Jim Conley, who was really guilty, why did the southern whites prefer to convict a white guy? Frank was guilty - that's why." Because not only was Frank a Jew but he was a Northern Jew. At that time, they were as hated as blacks. Where is your evidence that the governor was bought off?
@mavs2147 - You have no respect for the people who tried him - because you hate Christians - like Leo Frank's mother who stood up in the courtroom and shouted, "Christian dog!".
murder is never justice...it baffles me that people could have been so inhumane...whether he was guilty or innocent...lynching is crime against humanity and the ideals the American Constitution stands for...I am baffled and horrified that these barbarians "took the law into their hands"
Just in case anyone is interested about learning more about this case , "And the dead shall rise" by Steve Oney is a really exceptional account of the crime, trial, and horrific resulting events.
Wow. It's unfortunate how so many of these comments are absolutely ingnorant. I'm amazed at how racism still runs rampant in today's society. Jim Connely confessed before he died. For anyone out there wishing to see more on this story, there have been a few films made and a musical was written and produced on Broadway in the late 90's. For those of you who really think he was guilty, open your minds and try to hate a little less.
In his last day in office, Georgia governor John Slaton was bribed and commuted the sentence of Leo Frank, from death to life in prison. Slaton was also a partner in the firm defending Frank.
Governor Slaton announced the commutation from hanging to life imprisonment....and all hell broke loose in Atlanta.
Frank was lynched by a group consisting of leading citizens in the community - men prominent in business, medicine, social circles, and even in churches.
jim conley commited the murder he had a criminal background and he had a motive and an opprotunity to commit this crime. Leo frank was not liked by the people of the town since he was a jew. Jim conley assualted mary phagen and tried to pin it on the nightwatch man when that failed he then fabricated a story about leo franks having an intrest in mary phagen which was very clever on his part since everyone in the town disliked leo franks had franks been an anglo protestant conley would have hung.
doctorw2 1 month ago
I want to thank all of the anti-Semitic bigots who've commented here. It is for that reason and that reason alone that this past summer my youth theatre company took on the very difficult musical, Parade, composed by Jason Robert Brown and written by Alfred Uhry--two more of those "evil, plotting, manipulative Jews" you all are so scared of. (Give me a break!) Parade is about the Leo Frank case. We did the show to educate people against the garbage that so many of you are spewing here!
suejvin 3 months ago
@suejvin and all the people telling the truth want to thank you for bringing attention to the Frank case, because when people search on the keyword leo frank on Internet search engines, they are going to learn the truth about him. One hundred years of lies about the Frank case are coming to an end. The truth wins out in the end always.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist Yes, and so it has. Most of the evidence points to Jim Conley.
suejvin 3 months ago
@suejvin I like how you think.. That's why I subscribed.
gotch09 3 months ago
@gotch09 LOL! Thanks gotch09. Didn't think I'd have a "fan club" over this, but maybe we should form one. We'll call it "Intelligent Internet Users Against Bigoted Idiots."
suejvin 3 months ago
@suejvin Well, I'd vote for the "People With Functioning Brain Stems" association.
gotch09 2 months ago
@gotch09 If this were Facebook, I'd "like" your comment.
suejvin 2 months ago
No the Georgia Jury got it right......Leo Frank was the murderer. Just read the transcripts........check it out yourself. Mary Phagan's family got justice.
Edmund007013 3 months ago
It needs to be understood that one day, perhaps even generations from now, the name of Leo Frank will be cleared. This in no way suggests that it should be or he was not utterly guilty of the MONSTROUS crime he committed. Rather it is an observation on the relentless persistence of jewish racial advocacy. A lie repeated long enough will eventually find a foothold. It is not fitting that those who are to be held up as a "light unto the nations" should have hands sullied by a child's blood.
gentilegrief 4 months ago
It seems to dumb of a "plot" to have been from the mind of someone with above average intelligence and seems to be from mind of someone with IQ of 60-80.The janitor claimed he couldn't read/write when first questioned but when presented with his own handwriting from other sources admitted to and then claimed was paid $200 by frank to write and blame watchman and to make seem girl wrote while being murdered(huh?). A cleaning boy made a death bed confession in 70's he saw janitor with marys body.
blastforyou 4 months ago
Where was Leo Frank when Monteen Stover waited in his office from 12:05 to 12:10 PM on Saturday April 26, 1913?
vfuturist 5 months ago
@vfuturist The safe where he kept the checks was large enough that when the door was open a person could be hidden behind it. It's argued by his defense that she came in while he was working in the safe.
calibabe85 3 months ago
@calibabe85 the 4ft tall safe didn't stop anyone else that day, from coming into Leo Frank's office to get their pay envelope, why should it have stopped 5'2" Monteen Stover, who actually said she waited inside Leo Frank's empty office for 5 full minutes from 12:05 to 12:10PM. In response, to Monteen Stover saying his office was completely empty, Leo Frank said he might have "unconsciously" gone to the bathroom in the metal room. The place where all the forensic evidence of Mary Phagan's murder.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist So he has a poor choice of words,I'm sure you don't consciously think every single time you are going to the restroom,you just do it.It's natural so therefore it's unconsciously done.And why have you no argument for anything else everyone is pointing out?You keep claiming "forensic evidence" but the type of "forensic evidence" they had back then was pretty much a joke.Why don't you say anything about the boy that saw Jim carrying Marys body and then threatened to kill him if he told?
calibabe85 3 months ago
@calibabe85 Thank you for your intelligent and fact based comments!
2kiwigreeneyes 2 months ago
@calibabe85 read the 1,800 page Georgia Supreme Court case file on Leo Frank, the evidence sustains Leo Frank's guilt. Until you read the 1,800 page georgia supreme court case file on Leo Frank you can not make any educated statements about his innocence or guilt.
vfuturist 2 months ago
Those pieces of evidence were not tested, which is on record as well. The blood was not tested, the hair was not tested, and if counting what Leo Frank said about Newt Lee was the one bit of "absolute truth" you think is correct, what about all the other people who fabricated stories, including Conley, at the drop of a hat. Sorry, but the reenacting of the scene, put into the timeline, speaks the loudest. As does the handwriting "analysis", albeit not professional, done by Smith of the notes.
anneteacherful 6 months ago
@4teepee Leo Frank tried to pin the crime on Newt Lee, when that didn't work he tried to pin it on Jim Conley.
vfuturist 6 months ago
All the forensic evidence was in the Metal Room on the second floor, down the hall from Leo Frank's office. Mary Phagan's hair was found on the handle of the lathe in the metal room, so was a big fat blood stain on the floor in front of the lady's dressing room. Leo Frank on Sunday, said Newt Lee's time card was punched perfectly, on Monday he said Newt Lee's time card was missing punches in 3 places. Leo Frank tried to pin the crime on an honest nightwatchman.
vfuturist 6 months ago
@vfuturist The didn't have DNA testing back then, there's no proof that it was Mary's hair. All they could determine was it was female because it was long, and happened to be the same color of Mary. With the amount of girls that worked in that factory there's not telling now who's hair it was.
calibabe85 3 months ago
Look at the forensic evidence; the man was not guilty. Juries find people not guilty today for less compelling reasons, even if the forensics points the other way. Our jury system is supremely fallible because of this. And Frank's jury was continually being shown people who were paid by newspapers or unethical private detectives to give a story. The newspapers themselves hold a great deal of culpability in this case.
anneteacherful 6 months ago
@anneteacherful every level of the united states justice system looked at the case and found that the evidence was overwhelming against Leo Frank. Why don't you read the Brief of Evidence on the case? Leo Frank made a virtual murder confession when he said he "unconsciously" went to the bathroom in the metal room to explain why his office was empty between 12:05 and 12:10.
vfuturist 6 months ago
While I don't necessarily believe his sentence was commuted for the right reasons (because when does that ever happen?), looking at all the evidence, I can't see how he could have been guilty. And the legal system still sucks, and did more back then, so people are punished for things they don't do a lot, so it is odd his case gets so much attention. But bottom-line, if you lay it all out and look at it deeply enough, it becomes really difficult to believe he could have possibly been guilty.
DaftDreams 7 months ago
@DaftDreams did you actually read the entire 318 pages of the brief of evidence, including the exhibits? I'm willing to bet a dollar you didn't.
vfuturist 6 months ago
@vfuturist I have read and studied this case. EVERYTHING was circumstantial and "he said she said" evidence. There has been many more testimonies of people since this, plus evidence that was never allowed into court that proves Leo didn't do it.
calibabe85 3 months ago
@chewbaca1989 Polanski was a mental case remember his very young pregnant wife was brutally murdered in his home by the manson family. incomparable
BloodNorseGods 8 months ago
Before the Civil War, there was not that much hostility in the South toward Jews. Not that many Jews were there. Northern Jews were considered an asset by the Confederacy for trading with the South during the war. Union generals Grant and Sherman regarded them as a problem – for illegally trading with the enemy. When Jews came south as carpetbaggers after the war, southern hostility grew.
4teepee 11 months ago
@islezynkeez72 - hey guy - keep your hopes up. Maybe we'll meet some day.
bammbamm12 11 months ago
Blessings for the memory of Leo Frank, murdered by the gentiles. What of the girl? What is it, truly, one little shiksa slut? For that dog, a J-w should hang????!! It is blasphemy and still carried on to this day. Let the memory of this trespass against G-d's people never diminish!
jewsaregreat23 1 year ago
@jewsaregreat23 You are truly an idiot, if somebody kills another person they deserve death, black white filipino, WHATEVER. I really hope for the sake of the Jews that you are not truly a person who exists out in the real world. Gods people, where was your god for the holocaust? where was your god for the hundreds of pogroms that have happened to you throughout the years? I think you and every other Jew out in the world has to stop with this sanctimonious bullshit. You are merely a smug mortal.
leoothelip 1 year ago
@leoothelip We don't all deliver sanctimonious bullshit. I apologize for "jewsaregreat23," but don't lump all of us together with her. If you do, you're as bad as she is.
suejvin 3 months ago
@jewsaregreat23 Damn! As one to another, I'm embarrassed that you're Jewish. Are you serious?!!! You call this little girl who worked in the pencil company for pennies an hour a "shiksa slut"? You call her a "dog"? You're an extremist who gives the rest of us a bad name.
suejvin 3 months ago
Wow! After reading all of these comments, I am blown away by the amount of ignorance and Antisemitism in this country today.
suejvin 1 year ago 2
@suejvin Use that antisemitism as a smoke screen to cover up Leo Frank's guilt.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist Apparently, it is you who use Anti-Semitism to spew your hatred and garbage all over the internet.
suejvin 3 months ago
Why is Atlanta city government allowing BUCKHEAD BASEBALL to VIOLATE THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF "UNDESIRABLES" BY KICKING THEM OUT OF A CITY OF A ATLANTA PUBLIC PARK??? ChrisCrossdresser was SURROUNDED & BLOCKED by a group of angry white men when he DARED to walk on the public sidewalk in a city of Atlanta park! He felt like LEO FRANK being surrounded by a LYNCH MOB! Please YouTube 'Buckhead Baseball' to read all the comments. The AJC didn't consider the harassment "news worthy.
datamatx 1 year ago
No matter who the perp was, whether a jewish or african american man, a beautiful young girl was raped and murdered. Please don't forget that.
scorpietta 1 year ago
How can anyone with any scintilla of intelligence living in the 21st century still believe that Leo Frank was guilty? He was INNOCENT by virtue of irrefutable historical fact and posthumously pardoned by the state of Georgia in 1986.
rmamches 1 year ago 2
@rmamches
You obviously haven't studied the testimony in the case, you just read Jewish propaganda books on the subject, books which all spin the truth.
vfuturist 1 year ago
@rmamches I've read that the trial judge later said he wasn't convinced of Franks guilt but he felt very intimidated by the mindset at the time. THE TRIAL JUDGE QUESSTIONED FRANKS GUILT.Plus Conleys lawyer, Mr. Smith, went on to work to prove Frank innocent. This trial had serious problems.
gotch09 1 year ago
@gotch09 If the trial Judge doubted Leo Frank's guilt, why did he sentence Leo Frank to die on his 30th birthday, April 17, 1914. Would a doubting judge sentence someone to die on their birthday.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist The judge admitted that he was intimidated into by mob rule. I guess he was fearful of what the mob would do to his ass,
gotch09 3 months ago
@gotch09 can you show me a reliable source not written by a Jewish supremacist, that shows the judge admitted he was intimidated by Mob Rule and feared for his as, because that sounds like a total fabrication of lies.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist Can you show me proof that Leo Frank is guilty, that isn't just another incoherent anti-Semitic rant?
gotch09 3 months ago
@gotch09 Leo Frank made a virtual murder confession on August 18, 1913, at his trial. Do a search on Leo Frank murder confession and you will finally learn the truth. Leo Frank confessed to murdering Mary Phagan at his own trial.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@vfuturist Oh really now.
gotch09 3 months ago
@rmamches Because Leo Frank confessed to the murder of Mary Phagan on August 18, 1913, during his trial.
vfuturist 3 months ago
@WINGTV9 Obviously you know very little about the Talmud or most likely any religious scripture for that reason. This is not the place to spew your hatred of Jews and/or any other ethnic groups.
mightyoak11111 1 year ago
@mightyoak11111 The Talmud is pretty much pure evil, as Elizabeth Dilling's book, THE PLOT AGAINST CHRISTIANITY, reveals. The popes who had it burned did so with exceedingly good reason. There is probably no body of writing more vile than the Talmud.
WINGTV9 1 year ago
@WINGTV9 (Wikipedia ) Anti-Talmud accusations have a long history dating back to the 13th century when the associates of the Inquisition attempted to defame Jews and their religion The early material compiled by hateful preachers like Raymond Martini and Nicholas Donin remain the basis of all subsequent accusations against the Talmud. Some are true, most are false and based on quotations taken out of context, and some are total fabrications.
mightyoak11111 1 year ago
@WINGTV9 Based on your other comments on other channels, it is obvious to Youtube viewers that you simply use this as a vehicle to spew antiSemitic and bigoted remarks. I feel sorry for you.
mightyoak11111 1 year ago
he was innocent
He was only convicted because he was a Yankee Jew living in the South
luuij0ss 1 year ago
@Dabayare If you look at the history of the civil rights struggle in the US. For a long time, Jews and Blacks fought side by side. Jews have traditionally been advocates for equal rights in this country. Of course, there will always be those who were bigots just like there are in every ethnics group, black, white, and asian. Remember, the KKK and many other hate groups, hate Jews just as much as they do Blacks. There should be more collaboration and empathy between the two groups.
mightyoak11111 1 year ago
@mightyoak11111 I grew up down south so I know what you say is true. The Klans triage of hate was Blacks, Jews and Catholics. Oh and they didn't like Italians and "commies" either.
gotch09 1 year ago
@WINGTV9 It is sad how u must resort to defamation and religious bigotry when adding a comment here. You are, in part, why there continues to be so much hate in this world.
mightyoak11111 1 year ago
I'm doing the Leo Frank case for my book review for my US History class. No one knows about this case, and being a Jew from my mother's side and my entire Father's family being from the South this case hits home for me.
BJORT 1 year ago
he was innocent and didnt have anything to do with the crime
itsmefranksowhat 1 year ago
Poor man =(
HisEmerald 2 years ago
From having lived and worked in the Marietta area, I have no doubt that there are heirs of prominent, powerful families in that community who have worked for 100 years, and continue to work to supress the truth in this case. In many ways, what passed for "justice" 100 years ago is still the prevailing standards in North Georgia. Many believe that the victory of the yankees in the Civil War is a nasty rumor.
toes41852 2 years ago
I encourage everyone to read the book called the murder of little mary phagan - it will open your eyes, look it up
vfuturist 2 years ago
i never have but i would like to.
IoSonoUomo 2 years ago
I am sure there are classes for enthusiasts and for those who are just curious... Even if you are not jewish. But don't expect it to be a simple manual... It takes decades to learn this stuff properly
phidelt135 2 years ago
damn, this shows it just like i'd imagine from the story i read
IoSonoUomo 2 years ago
and them politicians who paid off that black man who testified against frank, he murdered that christian girl to bring a Jew hating incident and get the Jews of USA to support them banker criminals. the family of those in government then are still in government, and I bet you they also own banks as a reward for orchestrating this incident. go investigate all this and you find out I am right. it is a scheme only a person who is well aware of who and what the criminals in power are. human is beast
4mayabell 2 years ago
You are nothing but an evil person and I can prove it. First that is a lie. Secondly, whatever you call yourself Moslem or Christian, you care for no human. This murder was in 1913, the banker drug lord gangsters wanted to take control of USA money printing and banking. The lynching of a Jew convinced other Jews in USA and the world to join these criminals and support their overtaking of USA money printing rights; and The Federal Reserve Bank of New York came into power. Jews killing Jews for $.
4mayabell 2 years ago
Liberals in the South were responsible for this crime. It was motivated by class warfare. They used a black man (sort of the Obama of his time) to persecute a Jewish businessman and kill him on the false allegation of child molestation (guilty until proven innocent). The communist left of its day typified by the Democratic Party and the "Populist" movement lynched the unfortunate Jew and then formed the racially divisive Ku Klux Klan (a working class organization filled with union members).
ebonics4everyone 2 years ago
Frank did it. Read about the case in THE JEWISH REVOLUTIONARY SPIRIT AND ITS IMPACT ON WORLD HISTORY by E. Michael Jones.
WINGTV9 2 years ago 2
We couldn't turn back the time, but at least we can start being fair now that we are well informed...:(
RubyMay 2 years ago
The movie showing Frank was guilty or lied to the cops. I know some cops are corrupt and Frank did not say he did not know that girl. How could he say that when she was working in his factory? As for people who come and are false witnesses, many such people.
4mayabell 2 years ago 2
Oh yes, because every biggot is a Christian southerner, and every Christian southerner is a biggot.
Your statement is TOTALLY not as ignorant as the assumption that all Jews are money grubbing murderers. Nope, you're a real paragon of open-mindedness and tolerance.
Good thing there were never massive anti-black riots in places like Boston or Chicago, or major anti-Christian racist organizations who adhere to Nazi philosophy because that would totally throw a wrench in your logic.
Oh. Wait.
BackupMagus 2 years ago
He was convicted. It was appealed. Upheld. Went to the Supreme Court. Upheld. He *did* do it. Study the case and stop looking at snippets.
bammbamm12 2 years ago 2
the supreme court is not allowed to re-visit the facts, if you are screwed by a lower court only a mistake of law will help you.... His conviction was about as rightful as the mob that lynched him
phidelt135 2 years ago
Yes, we all know. The Jew must be innocent. To hell with the facts, the evidence, the testimony. Boy, those Rosenberg's really got shafted...Son of Sam too. He was guilty, and the "mob" were actually people who were cheated out of justice by NY Jew money. That's why they took the law into their own hands. Read the facts.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
The only witness they had was the man who evidence (both admitted and otherwise) pointed to as a real killer.. A prosecutor with political ambitions hoisted on the shoulder of a jubilant mob after a case filled with so much miscarige of justice, no judge today would allow it.... So you are an antisemite, you don't like the Jews. I am sure the internet is filled with scum like you, who share your opinion about Jew money and Jew influence. But don't bullshit... I know this case well enough
phidelt135 2 years ago
This was the point in history where the Jew declared war on the Southern White Christian. Since then they have backed every black revolutionary, and every black organization. There they were, NY Jews marching in Selma, when there were enough roaches and rats in Harlem (their own back yard) to last a lifetime. But here they are, trying to blame the murder on a black guy. Poor saps.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
For a moment there I thought you were actually concerned with some notion of justice. I guess you are nothing more than a biggot. you have no moral ground to stand on... You don't know the history of the very place you live and you blame all your problems on anyone who is remotely different. The Jew did not "declare war on the Souther White Christian", the Jew simply follows the teachings of judiasms, the refusal to sit still while somone is being treated unfairly.
phidelt135 2 years ago
Don't make me laugh. Most Jews don't even try to follow the ten commandments, much less try to get justice for others. They'll use others to do their fighting - that's about it - and that's what's going on right now with the American involvement in Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
oh a conspiracy theory nut who happens to be an anti-semite white southern christian.. no wonder you hate jews so much, you probably never even met one.... and when they are not busy raping girls and getting america to invade coutnries, they drink the blood of the innocent... your rhetoric is so old and comical, its friggin annoying...
phidelt135 2 years ago
That's your only recourse. Because all you had to begin with was the absurd comment that Jews are interested in justice and that's why they're resurrecting the Leo Frank case. What a laugh. As if Frank's Jewishness had nothing to do with it. Most Jews are atheists, and wouldn't know the Talmud if they tripped over it. The cat's out of the bag. The boy has cried "Wolf!" too many times. It's over, ye schlepp. Time to start saying, "Excuse me, my fault"...etc.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
when did they do that?
LeighMet 2 years ago
how is a jew controlled hollywood make this movie that clearly shows the jew did it? because the banker gangsters Federal Reserve Bank is behind it all. to remind jews to support them or else this can happen to them again. they are behind this incident as well to get support from Jews to take over the printing power of this country's money. They killed 2 presidents and threatened many more to achieve this. The family of those in power did the lynching still in government and I bet own banks.
4mayabell 2 years ago
Tendentiousness and conjecture. The question you should ask, is,why is this case being brought up again after 100 years? Frank was guilty, the governor was bought off. The people couldn't get justice through the courts, (and they let it run through trial, appeal and Supreme Court), so they took it upon themselves to deliver justice. The governor left the state immediately - abdicated, never to return to political office.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
This movie was made to remind Jews how ignorant the masses of the world are and how a murderer can be the witness. The politicians involved in the lynching, their family is still in government. Go check who is in charge of the banks in that state. The Federal Reserve wanted to come into power and get assistance from Jews and the governments of the state; this was a perfect set up to get the federal reserve to be put in power a few years later.
4mayabell 2 years ago
Do you just make this stuff up? The people were within their rights to lynch him. And there was no prejudice at all in those days against Jews. Protestants were more friendly toward Jews than they were Catholics. But Frank's attorney tried to blame it on an innocent (though not upstanding) black guy. Live with it.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
WHere do you get this information. Jews did not have the right to stay in certain hotels or have certain jobs. They were considered greedy and lets not forget everyone favorite joke "I jewed him down" meaning I got him to give me a better price
LeighMet 2 years ago
ON what evidence
LeighMet 2 years ago
This is unarguable. You hear one side of it - the side you like. Find all the original documents and then make your decision. Stop listening to your friends.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
what is your evidence?
LeighMet 2 years ago
@LeighMet Read the original documents. Then decide.
bammbamm12 2 years ago
@bammbamm12 Stop being an anti-semite.
mavs2147 2 months ago
@mavs2147 - What thinkest ye of Christ?
bammbamm12 2 months ago
one son of sam pleaded guilty. Two Mrs. Ethel rosenberg had nothing to do with it. It ws her husband her brother and their friends of course they were in her house. What facts do you go by the one you make up in your head.
LeighMet 2 years ago
@phidelt135 NOT TRUE, the georgia supreme court reviewed the case and felt the evidence justified the verdict of guilty.
vfuturist 6 months ago
@vfuturist What is not true exactly? Do you even know how common law works?
phidelt135 6 months ago
@bammbamm12 You continuously state that any who oppose YOUR verdict haven't looked at the case and offer no evidence.
Where is your evidence to support your own verdict of this man who was murderd by a bunch of ingrates?
grobo11 11 months ago
@grobo11 - My verdict? *MY* verdict? Get a life.
bammbamm12 11 months ago
@bammbamm12 So where is that evidence any way?
grobo11 11 months ago
@grobo11 - So you want to re-try the case? Why? Because he was a Jew? Wow. That's a fair approach. He was convicted and condemned to death. The Georgia Governor was either bribed or ordered by his Masonic superiors to commute his sentence to life in prison - it was the governor's last official act before he bolted from the state. Nevertheless, he was given a trial and found guilty. To reopen it is no more malicious than to try to reopen the Dreyfus case.
bammbamm12 11 months ago
@grobo11 try the web site leo frank dot org
vfuturist 6 months ago
Elicit sympathy? An innocent man was condemned, then lynched. And the people who did it remained quiet until their deaths. Only in the past few years have the survivors of the mob members spoken about it, including a man named Chuck Clay. He was a Georgia state legislator and his uncle was a lyncher.
jonlga 2 years ago
I don't believe Leo Frank was innocent. Remember in the south at that time, a black man was still considered "lower" than a white Jewish man. Even a young boy came forward to say the young woman, Mary, who was murdered was afraid of Leo Frank because he was trying to touch her in an inappropriate manner. The Jews own the media today and are trying to re-write history as another poster said on another video about this case. The southern whites would condemn a black man before they would a Jew.
hawkedge 2 years ago
Wrong. Frank was innocent. If you knew anything about the facts in this case then you wouldn't post the drivel you did.
jonlga 2 years ago
Jonlga, this is a clear cut case of a well-to-do man, regardless of his ethnic background, thinking he's above the law. It's very obvious from the trial transcripts I have read he was guilty. The people who lynched him were wrong. They should have been punished. I speak the truth when I say the Jewish people control the media and Hollywood. Many people in Hollywood feel that Roman Polanski should have his charges dropped. Would they feel that way if his name was Father Roman Polanski?
hawkedge 2 years ago 2
No, it wasn't obvious. Everything points towards Conley. I don't think Frank was convicted because of anti-Semitism, but I do think he was innocent.
lakme 2 years ago
Lakme, that's hogwash. Frank was guilty as charged. The lynching was wrong. I agree with that. No one should take the law into their own hands. Why didn't Conley break down on the stand? He was grilled for hours by experienced attorneys. This was a blow to the defense. Frank thought his money could get him off. People were bribed and afraid. This is a typical example of wealthy elites exploiting the poor and less educated. Perhaps one day all 3 bodies will be exhumed; DNA will point to Frank.
hawkedge 2 years ago
Conley killed the girl. Most murderers have no conscience and can pass the lie detector test and lie a thousand miles an hour. You need to know what evil is about. And them cops lies. The whole thing was a hate crime and pre planned. She was murdered on purpose to blame Frank. Maybe his rich uncle was trying to go into politics.
4mayabell 2 years ago
@4mayabell Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan in the second floor metal room, not Jim Conley.
vfuturist 6 months ago
@vfuturist there was saw dust found in Mary's lungs though, which was found down in the basement where she was found dead. Also Jim claims to have defecated in the elevator shaft earlier that day, then he claimed Leo and he took the elevator down to hide Mary's body. Yet when the police looked down the elevator shaft the feces were still in tact, meaning the elevator never went down......
calibabe85 3 months ago
@hawkedge there was a night watchman who seen everything but he was to afraid to speak at the time. On his death bead he opened up and and confessed that he had seen kill the little girl. All the evidence pointed to Conley all along. Leo frank wasn't a wealthy man. He was just the guy who handed out checks at a pencil factory. This trial is an example of how the media's influence can turn Corrupt a trial. A perfect example today would be the O J trial.
slamothecow 1 year ago
Study the facts of the trial. Evidence. How would you have a clue if you haven't spent 6 months reviewing the actual documents?
bammbamm12 2 years ago
I have actually been to Mary Phagan's grave. She's buried in the Marietta City Cemetery in Marietta, Georgia, about an hour from my house. And I have NO DOUBT whatsoever...that Jim Conley killed her when he was drunk. Not Leo Frank. Frank's crime was being a Northern Jew in 1913 Atlanta.
brnleague99 2 years ago
right so no innocent man sent to death.
happens all the time.
ltdan676 2 years ago
Yes, it does happen quite often. And who's to say the man was innocent.
Why rehash this? Why open old wounds? It doesn't make any sense.
White guilt, maybe that's the aim? Black guilt?
chewbaca1989 2 years ago
i heard that guy was a murderous sodomite. did he die?
VirtualBilly 2 years ago
i've done research for way longer than five minutes on this. it's not like i would make up the things i found out. and yeah, there is a ton of antisemitism on here and it's bullshit. it's also a big reason why people in georgia back then didn't believe his testimony.
the evidence i've read about doesn't point to frank. maybe you should look it up again.
and how do you know the governor was bought off?
astrostockbroker 2 years ago
You're not going to change their minds. They have this incredible belief that is bound up in religious or political zealotry and that does not allow them to consider other points of view.
They don't want to conside OPV because that might lead them to question their own beliefs and values. It's hard for people to do that because it might mean they were wrong.
Jcorp67 2 years ago
Ted Bundy was not Jewis. BTK was, I believe, a deacon in his church.Carla Faye Tucker found God while on death row. She was a Christian whjo became born again after her death sentence.
Jeffrey Dahmer, The Green River Killer, The Boston Strangler, etc, etc, etc, were all non Jews.
Jcorp67 2 years ago
I would imagine every parent would want their child to have such a degree or something like it.
But beingt that this is youtube and you go by a moniker and not your name, which is sensible, there is no way for me to say that I believe you.
Killers come from all religions and beliefs. Nobody is infallible.
Jcorp67 2 years ago
Nobody is infallible. There was a reasonable doubt about whether or not he committed this murder and the state gave a pardon for it in 1986.
The Jew you refer to as far as I know were wastching the events with binoculars and recording. Muslims in Bat Ridge Brooklyn aas well as Patterson NJ were dancing like many on the West bank.
Jcorp67 2 years ago
You are going to pay for condemning Jews. We all killed Jesus because of our sins may god forgive us all
loveisyors 2 years ago
One of the two did it. Are you going to blame it on the black guy just because you want the jew to be innocent? Maybe they should have let Son of Sam go - blame it a black guy. No - look at the evidence - there's a whole lot of it.
bammbamm12 2 years ago 2
if you look at the evidence, he probably wasn't guilty. the crime scene was trashed, there was some blood there that wasn't tested, and jim conley changed his story three times. The governor wasn't bought out. the jury probably was.
and "2040whitemniority", it is never ok to lynch someone. ever. and just because prominent people were in the lynch mob doesn't mean they were right in thinking that he was guilty.
astrostockbroker 2 years ago
Look at the evidence? You must be kidding. This went on for two years. You've given it about 5 minutes and you think you have the answer? There was no doubt about his guilt. The judge commuted his death sentence to life - that's why they stormed the jail and lynched him. But there was never any doubt about his guilt. The governor was bought off. Sheesh. The NY Times was involved in this case and it took place in Marietta Georgia. Yeah, yeah...jealousy, anti-semitism, that's all you've got.
bammbamm12 2 years ago 5
@bammbamm12 I know Jews have a lousy anti-semitic tick to call it out unanimously, a guilt disorder be it. But the think with them is they truly appreciate the sanctity of a life and a death, just like Christians. Maybe bigotry is innate. Or maybe whites have a broader hand to deal it, when Gabrielle Giffords got shot last week a bunch of lunatics like you had the nerve to say it was a Jew who did it! Just to get the old blood boiling for some good old fashioned Jew bashing!
leoothelip 1 year ago
Leo Frank was guilty. He was lynched because the people knew that the Governor was bought off by NY (Jew) money, to commute his sentence from death to life in prison. (I doubt they'll tell you that). The Governor then abdicated and skipped town. Yes, the people were after him too. Ask yourselves this though: If it was the black guy, Jim Conley, who was really guilty, why did the southern whites prefer to convict a white guy? Frank was guilty - that's why.
bammbamm12 2 years ago 2
Racism against blacks is exactly why Frank was convicted. No one believed a black man was intelligent enough to make up a story like Conley did.
lakme 2 years ago
@bammbamm12 You have the keen approach to solving mysteries of a private eye dont you bambam. Its funny how noble of you to call Jews white, but in the same sentence refer to them in a totally different entity. Truth is you have an appalling bias towards Jews even though you know how the game works. You know Jews are conned into disreputable positions and talked down upon, especially in the bible belt of all places. Jew money? Conolly admitted to this crime on his dead bed.
leoothelip 1 year ago
@bammbamm12 "If it was the black guy, Jim Conley, who was really guilty, why did the southern whites prefer to convict a white guy? Frank was guilty - that's why." Because not only was Frank a Jew but he was a Northern Jew. At that time, they were as hated as blacks. Where is your evidence that the governor was bought off?
mavs2147 2 months ago
@mavs2147 - You have no respect for the people who tried him - because you hate Christians - like Leo Frank's mother who stood up in the courtroom and shouted, "Christian dog!".
bammbamm12 2 months ago
murder is never justice...it baffles me that people could have been so inhumane...whether he was guilty or innocent...lynching is crime against humanity and the ideals the American Constitution stands for...I am baffled and horrified that these barbarians "took the law into their hands"
wideanglefocus 2 years ago
Just in case anyone is interested about learning more about this case , "And the dead shall rise" by Steve Oney is a really exceptional account of the crime, trial, and horrific resulting events.
gigi6196 2 years ago
Frank was clearly innocent. On the other hand, the evidence indicates that Conley killed Mary Phagan.
1kkyu 2 years ago
Hopefully your joking, if not, you are a completely ignorant dumbass.
rachaelk74 2 years ago
Wow. It's unfortunate how so many of these comments are absolutely ingnorant. I'm amazed at how racism still runs rampant in today's society. Jim Connely confessed before he died. For anyone out there wishing to see more on this story, there have been a few films made and a musical was written and produced on Broadway in the late 90's. For those of you who really think he was guilty, open your minds and try to hate a little less.
rachaelk74 2 years ago
looks like this would make a great movie
Mattressification 2 years ago
Leo Frank was absolutely GUILTY.
In his last day in office, Georgia governor John Slaton was bribed and commuted the sentence of Leo Frank, from death to life in prison. Slaton was also a partner in the firm defending Frank.
Governor Slaton announced the commutation from hanging to life imprisonment....and all hell broke loose in Atlanta.
Frank was lynched by a group consisting of leading citizens in the community - men prominent in business, medicine, social circles, and even in churches.
2040whiteminority 2 years ago
I've always been very interested in this case. Will it appear on television any time soon?
memphisangel56 2 years ago
Will this be shown on TV? Or released soon on DVD?
jamesjeffreypaul 2 years ago
The best part is when they hanged em!
slaytanic213 2 years ago
Leo Frank was innocent.
i can't wait to see this!
siegeunderfire 2 years ago
when movie start?
hcannonii 2 years ago
Leo Frank sodomized and killed a 12 yr-old girl in 1913 Atlanta but today he is a martyr
napajedlacek 2 years ago
good job hollywood....:-(
napajedlacek 2 years ago
dont read too much main stream propaganda.
napajedlacek 2 years ago
An amazing story...
smrosmarin 2 years ago
Never forget Leo Frank! He was the victim of one of the great injustices of all times.
1kkyu 2 years ago
If you get your "history" from hollyweird...hahahaha
stertim 2 years ago 2
Leo murdered 13-yrs old girl, so what's wrong in hanging murderer???
robe2321321 2 years ago