President Carter got the peace prize too. You know Obama was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize twelve days after taking office. Upon acceptance of winning it, Obama was praised by the committee, "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy". . They also gave the peace prize to Yasser Arafat, the leader of the PLO, the best known terrorist organization on the globe. This is like giving it to David Duke, the former Grand Wizard of the KKK.
What Carter had that his opponents did not was the acceptance and support of elite sectors of the mass communications media. It was their favorable coverage of Carter and his campaign that gave him an edge, propelling him rocket-like to the top of the opinion polls.
Obama is not as fully owned by the Israel Lobby as is Clinton and McCain. This scares Israeli firsters like Kristol. They know that the pols they have pushed around for decades see an opening. Payback will be severe for these traitors
Billary and John McShitstain are snakes in the grass slithering around together plotting, scheming, and manipulating the media(Fox,etc.) in a desperate attempt at dragging Barack Obama into the dirt. Like pigs, Hil, Bill, and John are comfortable rolling around in feces....the SPIN STARTS HERE! They are full of foxshit! lol
Bill Kristol is an idiot. Ask him about the "pop sociology" that Shiite and Sunnis somehow can't get along ("There's almost no evidence of that at all"). Yeah, Iraq was a cakewalk, Bill. And Sunnis and Shiites are getting along swimingly. Asstard.
I have to agree with the comparison. In '76 the republican party was in disarray from watergate, a failed war, and agitation from the far Left. JC ran a campaign based on human rights and honesty. His theme was Change and his slogan was "I will never lie to you". The ironic part is that he really meant it and governed accordingly. Unfortunately, politicians must be cold blooded and pragmatic. JC was naive and idealistic. His presidency was a colossal failure and Reagan carried 49 states in '80.
I thought you had me, but I checked Wikpedia. In 1980, Reagan won the popular vote over Carter 50% to 41% and won in the electoral college 489 to 49. Carter obviously carried more than the one state I cited earlier, but I'm not sure how many. But you're right that the 1984 election was much more one-sided.
I say "nearly won reelection" because he led in the polls up until the last month or so. Had it not of been for the Iranian hostage crisis, he might of won. Carter wasn't nearly the failure that Kristol seems to suggest, though I too fear some similarity between the two. Both inexperienced and following a corrupt Republican Administration with a promise of Change. If Obama fails, it could be disastrous, not just for the DNC, but for black politics in general.
Reagan won 44 states to Carter's 6, with Reagan winning 489 electoral votes to Carter's 44. It was a Reagan blow out in 1980, not even close. Please don't try to make up history.
It is difficult to tell who you are replying to, but since I'm actually old enough to remember the 1980 Election, please note that Carter led in the polls up until a month before the election, and the fact he and Ted Kennedy split the Democratic vote didn't help.
Hillary Clinton has once again demonstrated that she is in the hip pocket of the neo-conservatives. She has taken Bill Kristol up on this advice with her "3 AM" television ad. If Clinton were in the White House will she surround herself with her little neo-conservative friends and get us into another war in the Middle East or Central Asia?
Wake up fellow americans, Bill Kristol is a hardcore Zionist and the Isreal Lobby is hitting Obama. I would prefer Ron Paul, but I could live with Obama. We must stop the warmonger Mcain and the NEOLIB Hillary Clinton and her Zionist friend Madeliene Allbriaght.
Bill Kristol is a vegatable for FOX NOISE and needs to grow a brain. He and his PNAC buddies are responsible for this disasterous foriegn policy that we have now! Slap this man! Please!
BI30 the fact that you are relying on this outright lier to convince you that Hilary Clinton would be a better Pres is sad. Fox news and Kristol has pushed the Iraq war from day one,been wrong on every issue and this is the guy that you're relying on ?
And who really gives a big rat turd what this NEOCON idiot has to say.He's one of the biggest liars on Faux and that takes in quite a lot of company.He hasn't been right on anything as long as I've seen or heard him.
Kristol has been wrong on just about everything he has predicted/stated. So far Obama has shown himself a better leader than Clinton in the campaign he has run. It was hers to lose.
Clinton's adminstration made mistakes as well (as it relates to foreign policies). The WTC was attacked the first time and Clinton had a chance to kill Osama bin Laden but did not - just to name a couple. I bet - all administrations/individuals have learned from each others mistakes. Plus - new situations will arise so it will take good judgement.
yeah but other than that he did great. And the reason he didnt kill osama is because their were innocent women and children there in that camp ,who could or woudl have died 2. So maybe bin laden would have been killed but fro mthe ashes of that attack even more terrorist would spew/spawn, you never know . It's easy to judge in retrospect. But clinton had the balls to do somethign about the balkan even thoug hthe russians were against it. Bush doesnt dare t ostand against putin
Carter wasn't a disaster for the country; people were just too stupid to re-elect him because of the hostage crisis.
Kristol isn't the typical ranting pinhead Fox news panelist, he's a major league neocon liar. Clinton's presidency was not a success for "liberal" policies. Clinton eliminated welfare, and passed GATT. A good rule of thumb, if Kristol is backing someone, vote for the other guy.
he is a russian jew. end of discussion
scrilla82 4 months ago
President Carter got the peace prize too. You know Obama was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize twelve days after taking office. Upon acceptance of winning it, Obama was praised by the committee, "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy". . They also gave the peace prize to Yasser Arafat, the leader of the PLO, the best known terrorist organization on the globe. This is like giving it to David Duke, the former Grand Wizard of the KKK.
.
Allen West 2012
Gracelandification 1 year ago
Does Billy see any similarity between his mug and a bung hole one wonders?
Tippersnore 1 year ago
stupid fox news its crap
nicksuprabravesfan 1 year ago
@nicksuprabravesfan Yeah, and CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC are sooooo much more unbiased. What orifice is your head stuck in?
RythmandStrings 10 months ago
What Carter had that his opponents did not was the acceptance and support of elite sectors of the mass communications media. It was their favorable coverage of Carter and his campaign that gave him an edge, propelling him rocket-like to the top of the opinion polls.
mike1111qq 2 years ago
Why would anyone listen to Krystol, anyway??? he was a propogandist for the Iraq War. He has been wrong on everything!!! He wants to bomb Iran!!!
larma7 3 years ago
Obama is not as fully owned by the Israel Lobby as is Clinton and McCain. This scares Israeli firsters like Kristol. They know that the pols they have pushed around for decades see an opening. Payback will be severe for these traitors
oldjoe5 3 years ago 3
Let me understand- You think Obama hates Israel more than Carter? Is that possible?
bob4this 3 years ago
He likes Hillary because he's scared SHITLESS of Obama
mcmac0224 3 years ago
Billary and John McShitstain are snakes in the grass slithering around together plotting, scheming, and manipulating the media(Fox,etc.) in a desperate attempt at dragging Barack Obama into the dirt. Like pigs, Hil, Bill, and John are comfortable rolling around in feces....the SPIN STARTS HERE! They are full of foxshit! lol
nebaioth 3 years ago
Bill Kristol is an idiot. Ask him about the "pop sociology" that Shiite and Sunnis somehow can't get along ("There's almost no evidence of that at all"). Yeah, Iraq was a cakewalk, Bill. And Sunnis and Shiites are getting along swimingly. Asstard.
ProlefeedTV 3 years ago
I have to agree with the comparison. In '76 the republican party was in disarray from watergate, a failed war, and agitation from the far Left. JC ran a campaign based on human rights and honesty. His theme was Change and his slogan was "I will never lie to you". The ironic part is that he really meant it and governed accordingly. Unfortunately, politicians must be cold blooded and pragmatic. JC was naive and idealistic. His presidency was a colossal failure and Reagan carried 49 states in '80.
JohnR22926 3 years ago
Slight correction. Reagan carried 49 states in '84, not '80, running against former VP Mondale. Carter nearly won reelection in '80.
BI30 3 years ago
I thought you had me, but I checked Wikpedia. In 1980, Reagan won the popular vote over Carter 50% to 41% and won in the electoral college 489 to 49. Carter obviously carried more than the one state I cited earlier, but I'm not sure how many. But you're right that the 1984 election was much more one-sided.
JohnR22926 3 years ago
I say "nearly won reelection" because he led in the polls up until the last month or so. Had it not of been for the Iranian hostage crisis, he might of won. Carter wasn't nearly the failure that Kristol seems to suggest, though I too fear some similarity between the two. Both inexperienced and following a corrupt Republican Administration with a promise of Change. If Obama fails, it could be disastrous, not just for the DNC, but for black politics in general.
BI30 3 years ago
Reagan barely won in 1980 and would have lost has the strong third party run by John Anderson not siphoned off many Carter votes.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
Are you kidding me? Carter won 3 states in 1980.
chipwhatup 3 years ago
Sorry dude, you're thinking Mondale in '84, who only won his home state of Minnesota and DC.
BI30 3 years ago
Reagan won 44 states to Carter's 6, with Reagan winning 489 electoral votes to Carter's 44. It was a Reagan blow out in 1980, not even close. Please don't try to make up history.
chipwhatup 3 years ago
It is difficult to tell who you are replying to, but since I'm actually old enough to remember the 1980 Election, please note that Carter led in the polls up until a month before the election, and the fact he and Ted Kennedy split the Democratic vote didn't help.
BI30 3 years ago
Comment removed
mike1111qq 2 years ago
Jimmy Carter is a loser. I'm glad I was born AFTER his presidency was over.
orvgg 3 years ago
Which explains your ignorance.
catbuffalo 3 years ago
Hillary Clinton has once again demonstrated that she is in the hip pocket of the neo-conservatives. She has taken Bill Kristol up on this advice with her "3 AM" television ad. If Clinton were in the White House will she surround herself with her little neo-conservative friends and get us into another war in the Middle East or Central Asia?
classic14rider 3 years ago
Wake up fellow americans, Bill Kristol is a hardcore Zionist and the Isreal Lobby is hitting Obama. I would prefer Ron Paul, but I could live with Obama. We must stop the warmonger Mcain and the NEOLIB Hillary Clinton and her Zionist friend Madeliene Allbriaght.
tonylee1973 3 years ago 2
Kristol is an Israeli agent, he's not a real Americna.
JimmySmers 3 years ago
Bill Kristol is a vegatable for FOX NOISE and needs to grow a brain. He and his PNAC buddies are responsible for this disasterous foriegn policy that we have now! Slap this man! Please!
scj16 3 years ago
What the rightwing is doing is framing the issue,John Kerry not a war hero and Bush was to be praised ?
Come on man this guy has a agenda and it's not good for this country.
This guy doesn't want meetings with the Palestinians.He just wants war.
Democracy1st 3 years ago
BI30 the fact that you are relying on this outright lier to convince you that Hilary Clinton would be a better Pres is sad. Fox news and Kristol has pushed the Iraq war from day one,been wrong on every issue and this is the guy that you're relying on ?
Democracy1st 3 years ago 2
I'm not relying on anything, nor am I using the video to promote one candidate over another. It should only serve as a cautionary tale.
BI30 3 years ago
And who really gives a big rat turd what this NEOCON idiot has to say.He's one of the biggest liars on Faux and that takes in quite a lot of company.He hasn't been right on anything as long as I've seen or heard him.
blair227 3 years ago 2
Kristol has been wrong on just about everything he has predicted/stated. So far Obama has shown himself a better leader than Clinton in the campaign he has run. It was hers to lose.
NShutterbug 3 years ago 3
Clinton's adminstration made mistakes as well (as it relates to foreign policies). The WTC was attacked the first time and Clinton had a chance to kill Osama bin Laden but did not - just to name a couple. I bet - all administrations/individuals have learned from each others mistakes. Plus - new situations will arise so it will take good judgement.
vonniewit 3 years ago
yeah but other than that he did great. And the reason he didnt kill osama is because their were innocent women and children there in that camp ,who could or woudl have died 2. So maybe bin laden would have been killed but fro mthe ashes of that attack even more terrorist would spew/spawn, you never know . It's easy to judge in retrospect. But clinton had the balls to do somethign about the balkan even thoug hthe russians were against it. Bush doesnt dare t ostand against putin
Galvatron7 3 years ago
this guy is straight out of 1984
steers41 3 years ago
Carter wasn't a disaster for the country; people were just too stupid to re-elect him because of the hostage crisis.
Kristol isn't the typical ranting pinhead Fox news panelist, he's a major league neocon liar. Clinton's presidency was not a success for "liberal" policies. Clinton eliminated welfare, and passed GATT. A good rule of thumb, if Kristol is backing someone, vote for the other guy.
givebirthathome 3 years ago
YES INDEED! HILLARY IS THE ONE!
sarajoony 3 years ago