An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
Merging black holes would look like that but on the level it was implied being a galaxy it would look drastically different. At that level your talking two colliding super-massive black holes. That would look more like two galaxies turning into a larger composite galaxy over billions or trillions of years depending on the velocity of the colliding galaxy, but in the end it would be a giant version of this display forming a galaxy out of the two previous galaxies. Great animation. :)
@BrcCmplfan It was only a theory about 10-15 years ago.Today it is a proven fact that almost every galaxy has a supermassive black hole in the center and millions more stellar mass blackholes wich are remnants of super and hypernova explosions.
Car5lover 2nd point is correct that black holes are not predatory eaters - if the sun become a black hole (aside from issues of how, or end of heat/light to keep us alive) the earth would still orbit as it does a 1 solar mass object. It as matter approaches very close that gravity gets stronger; the very small size of the event horizon allows getting very close, and the required orbital speed increases progressively to the speed of light before, at the event horizon, even this is insufficient.
... massive black holes will have event horizons (point of no return for light) further out, and the gravitaional shear on an object (the difference between that felt by part of object closer to the BH than the part furthest away) is less for larger black holes (i.e. an astronaut falling into supermassive black hole might not be spaggetified - drawn into long thread) at the event horizon. Event horizon is located at the Schwarzschild radius (approx 2.95 km/solar mass, so for the Earth 9mm)
formsdn - BH are (per current imperfect theory) infinite density at infinitessimally small size (a singularity). They come in different masses, and could be formed from low density material if enough of it... but that low density material will compress gravitationally long before reaches black hole status (via degenerate matter of neutronium as per neutron stars) and at critical point collapse further into singularity/black hole. ...
The thing i dont get it is why are they so sure that bh will merge. Yes, i know they've made a model. But... i know what is modelling. Was merging of bh derived from some solution of Einsteins equations? There are stable binary star systems. Then shouldnt be there a stable binary black hole system?
@formsdn quasar SDSS 153636.22+044127.0 at a distance of about 4 billion light years
That's the first tightly bound binary black hole system found. Here's the article: blogs.discovermagazine(.)com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/binary-black-holes-terrorize-quasar-nucleus/
@BrcCmplfan - Thank you for your comment. Could you state your professional qualifications in astrophysics to defend your opinion? If not, please take it up with the animator. =)
By the way, I love hearing idiots say that "it's only a theory".
...Like Atomic Theory (which we used to make atom bombs and nuclear power plants), the theory of Evolution, the Heliocentric theory (the Earth revolves around the sun), Germ Theory (microscopic organisms cause diesease)...ect.
sorry if im being too critical but there is a few things wrong in this simulation
1: black holes are supermassive objects the less than the size of your thumbnail, not as large as the objects circling around it.
2: black holes do NOT EAT ANYTHING black holes are objects not as the name suggests "hole" objects including light waves are caught in the gravitational pull and orbit around the black hole without going into it (unlike the part at 0:23)
@Car5lover - I appreciate your comments, however, artists do occasionally take artistic license in visualizations to make concepts easier to represent to the general public... also, this animation was created by other artists for NASA. I added a link to the bottom of the video description if you'd like to visit the source. The animator's name is Dana Berry.
1. Black holes are not so small. Theoretically, there are may be micro black holes, but usually they are bigger. Afaik, bh with 1 solar mass will have size of big city. The second is that not massive bh need to be very dense, but super massive black holes need not. Keeping in mind the ammount of mass in supermassive bh, they must be pretty big.
2. It is not light that orbits around bh, but hot gas. And objects, that "crossed the line" will fall down into bh, they wont orbit around.
@Car5lover The event horizon of a stellar-mass black hole is about the size of a town. The supermassive black holes in galactic cores have horizons about the size of a star.
Cool. :)
hongmeiformoses 1 week ago
I hate this video it is so crapy
agarofalo2001 1 week ago
How expensive was this to make?
wesselbindt 2 months ago
Of all the many types of things in the universe quasi-stellar objects have to be the best :)
FuzzyWuzzyWazzaBear 2 months ago
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
peopledick 2 months ago
Merging black holes would look like that but on the level it was implied being a galaxy it would look drastically different. At that level your talking two colliding super-massive black holes. That would look more like two galaxies turning into a larger composite galaxy over billions or trillions of years depending on the velocity of the colliding galaxy, but in the end it would be a giant version of this display forming a galaxy out of the two previous galaxies. Great animation. :)
Score1ForTheRepublic 3 months ago
Your simulation is partially inaccurate.
Black holes only get the light from their "food" and the actual black hole does not emit light.
lagio5 3 months ago
@lagio5 They spin as fast as light speed near the even horizon so thats why it emits light
shadow27568 3 months ago
What's gonna happen now that it has been proven that it's possible to travel at speeds faster than light?
CircadianKruger 4 months ago
@CircadianKruger It hasn't actually been proven. Media hype and all that. Though they are running the experiments again.
If it is proven, new theories will have to be constructed based on this discovery.
Bjornulfr23 3 months ago
@BrcCmplfan black holes...a theory....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
DeathMetalMorty 4 months ago
Cool
13sam31 4 months ago
@BrcCmplfan It was only a theory about 10-15 years ago.Today it is a proven fact that almost every galaxy has a supermassive black hole in the center and millions more stellar mass blackholes wich are remnants of super and hypernova explosions.
Someone hasn't been keaping up with science :)
TheBlackIdentety 4 months ago
Car5lover 2nd point is correct that black holes are not predatory eaters - if the sun become a black hole (aside from issues of how, or end of heat/light to keep us alive) the earth would still orbit as it does a 1 solar mass object. It as matter approaches very close that gravity gets stronger; the very small size of the event horizon allows getting very close, and the required orbital speed increases progressively to the speed of light before, at the event horizon, even this is insufficient.
bi1iruben 5 months ago
... massive black holes will have event horizons (point of no return for light) further out, and the gravitaional shear on an object (the difference between that felt by part of object closer to the BH than the part furthest away) is less for larger black holes (i.e. an astronaut falling into supermassive black hole might not be spaggetified - drawn into long thread) at the event horizon. Event horizon is located at the Schwarzschild radius (approx 2.95 km/solar mass, so for the Earth 9mm)
bi1iruben 5 months ago
formsdn - BH are (per current imperfect theory) infinite density at infinitessimally small size (a singularity). They come in different masses, and could be formed from low density material if enough of it... but that low density material will compress gravitationally long before reaches black hole status (via degenerate matter of neutronium as per neutron stars) and at critical point collapse further into singularity/black hole. ...
bi1iruben 5 months ago
The thing i dont get it is why are they so sure that bh will merge. Yes, i know they've made a model. But... i know what is modelling. Was merging of bh derived from some solution of Einsteins equations? There are stable binary star systems. Then shouldnt be there a stable binary black hole system?
formsdn 6 months ago
@formsdn quasar SDSS 153636.22+044127.0 at a distance of about 4 billion light years
That's the first tightly bound binary black hole system found. Here's the article: blogs.discovermagazine(.)com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/binary-black-holes-terrorize-quasar-nucleus/
TheBlackIdentety 4 months ago
@BrcCmplfan DERP.
bob88099 1 year ago
@BrcCmplfan OMFG, Black holes are proven to exist a long time ago LOL
gyurchev 1 year ago
@BrcCmplfan - Thank you for your comment. Could you state your professional qualifications in astrophysics to defend your opinion? If not, please take it up with the animator. =)
djxatlanta 1 year ago 10
@djxatlanta
Excellent animation.
By the way, I love hearing idiots say that "it's only a theory".
...Like Atomic Theory (which we used to make atom bombs and nuclear power plants), the theory of Evolution, the Heliocentric theory (the Earth revolves around the sun), Germ Theory (microscopic organisms cause diesease)...ect.
;)
SinnFein4ever 3 months ago
sorry if im being too critical but there is a few things wrong in this simulation
1: black holes are supermassive objects the less than the size of your thumbnail, not as large as the objects circling around it.
2: black holes do NOT EAT ANYTHING black holes are objects not as the name suggests "hole" objects including light waves are caught in the gravitational pull and orbit around the black hole without going into it (unlike the part at 0:23)
Nice video anyway :D
Car5lover 1 year ago
@Car5lover - I appreciate your comments, however, artists do occasionally take artistic license in visualizations to make concepts easier to represent to the general public... also, this animation was created by other artists for NASA. I added a link to the bottom of the video description if you'd like to visit the source. The animator's name is Dana Berry.
djxatlanta 1 year ago
@djxatlanta okays no problem :D enjoyed the vid anyway
Car5lover 1 year ago
@djxatlanta The black holes should be orbiting on an elliptical...srry for being picky I have like minor OCD.
leinad580 4 months ago
@Car5lover
1. Black holes are not so small. Theoretically, there are may be micro black holes, but usually they are bigger. Afaik, bh with 1 solar mass will have size of big city. The second is that not massive bh need to be very dense, but super massive black holes need not. Keeping in mind the ammount of mass in supermassive bh, they must be pretty big.
2. It is not light that orbits around bh, but hot gas. And objects, that "crossed the line" will fall down into bh, they wont orbit around.
formsdn 6 months ago
@Car5lover The event horizon of a stellar-mass black hole is about the size of a town. The supermassive black holes in galactic cores have horizons about the size of a star.
ajpmathwiz 4 months ago
Comment removed
Car5lover 1 year ago
Hm, this is an interesting video.
Do the event horizons of the black holes really merge together like that?
-Max
Maxo12110 1 year ago
@Maxo12110 - theoretically, yes.
djxatlanta 1 year ago