He assumes that the series tends to a continues function as T go’s to infinity. Since this is not a proof, I can live with that.
The problem that I have is that as T go’s to infinity the distance between the points at each end of the period tends to 0. As this happens the values between the points (Including the ends of the period) tend to a single point on the x axes. This means that it will tend to a non-Integrable function.
@laserbruce more dire a problem in my opinion is that the cardinality of the real line is greater than that of the set of all points spaced 1/T apart, so there will always be a huge gap when trying to cover up the real line with these points
"This is so good. It's better than sex! Not that I'd know, I was a math major." LOL!
devnullnor 4 days ago
Osgood is worth the wait. Great man.
grunder20 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
31:18 lool
sensingchange 4 months ago
Comment removed
sensingchange 4 months ago
Comment removed
sensingchange 4 months ago
Comment removed
kenfujimoto47 8 months ago in playlist Course | The Fourier Transforms and Its Applications
in the formula he writes down at 24:11: shouldn´t the integrand just be g(s) so that the "cursive F" should be omitted here ?
cartmansuperstar 11 months ago
@cartmansuperstar I think so too - just Integral g(s) ds.
PeaceAndGloryMB 9 months ago
He assumes that the series tends to a continues function as T go’s to infinity. Since this is not a proof, I can live with that.
The problem that I have is that as T go’s to infinity the distance between the points at each end of the period tends to 0. As this happens the values between the points (Including the ends of the period) tend to a single point on the x axes. This means that it will tend to a non-Integrable function.
Someone show me the light.
laserbruce 1 year ago
@laserbruce more dire a problem in my opinion is that the cardinality of the real line is greater than that of the set of all points spaced 1/T apart, so there will always be a huge gap when trying to cover up the real line with these points
ibreakkidslegs 1 year ago
What is the proof that a non-periodic function can be expressed in terms of the sum of periodic functions?
alquiora 1 year ago
can someone please tell me what that crazy looking symbol is that he is using to represent the Fourier transform?
smitty121981 1 year ago
@smitty121981 Looks like a cursive F
sammysoil77 1 year ago
"The kinda signal society needs" :)
eluilu 1 year ago
I have no doubt why blackboard still a favourite media used in the top ten university..
DOS32 1 year ago
Comment removed
sfish7 1 year ago
18:28 He knows we are watching O_O
Mattprole 2 years ago
The sync function is the frequency distribution of the square wave?
luzzie9 2 years ago
Prof Osgood is very good.
Naam19 2 years ago 4
it is usable for some functions ..
123xxrobertx 3 years ago
"Do you like integration by parts? I do." lol, i laughed really hard at 44:05
sikory 3 years ago 10