It is two part writing; one part for the upper manual and one part for the lower manual with the exception of the cadences at the end of each section.
This is nitpicking, but perhaps the problem here is that the tempo is not STEADY, i.e. there is lot of disconcerting rubato. Don't know. It's good to hear this and Sokolov's - they're both a million miles better than I could manage!
well, yes, it should go some faster... but stupid of you mentioning Sokolov... since this is an early music instrument and performance... and NEVER NEVER mix modern performed standarized music styles and musicians with early music.... urrgghh
There is much out there that is historically-informed and yet which misses the essence of the music. Which is most important: an appropriate tempo, an appropriate timbre, or capturing the spirit? Cheers.
Well, without an appropriate tempo and an appropriate timbre, it's impossible to capture the spirit. However, a great artist such as Sokolov can occasionally create the right timbre on the wrong instrument; he does pretty well with this movement, I must say. And that's high praise coming from me--I'm a harpsichordist myself.
I would have to say that incorrect playing is always incorrect playing--blunders are blunders, universally (such as making breaks in phrases on account of incorrect fingering). Considering that--particularly in Baroque music--virtually all 'spirit' is in the composition itself. That said, I would consider tempo to be both by far and self-evidently the most important in 'capturing spirit', provided, obviously, that the music is otherwise played 'correctly'.
@xgianpatrick It's all important, tempo, timbre, and spirit. There is much out there non-historically-informed that doesn't capture the spirit. (Bachscholar's Scarlatti K 1.) Glenn Gould played the A minor invention Presto (too fast), and Toccata E minor Partita (too slow). One works, one doesn't.
playing really fast is not a good idea on most old instruments. they start sounding like a tin can filled with nails, rolling down a stony hill. his tempo is good. anything faster, and it would sound terrible.
You've got that right, though, almost better said: the harpsichord can take the music. My point being that instrument most commonly used to play ante-Romantic keyboard music--the modern piano--cannot truly.
his tempo is fine. playing faster than that would be ill-advised. with those old instruments, if you play too fast, they sound like tin cans filled with nails, rolling down a stony hillside. tempo depends strongly on what instrument you're playing on. what sounds nice on a piano, can easily sound awful on an organ, cembalo, or electronic keyboard.
Gosh, how did Scarlatti negotiate sonatas on his harpsichord when he wished the tempo to be "Prestissimo" as in K. 517, for instance? I notice that the instrument on which this artist plays was made in 1987. Could it be relied upon to play fast pieces by Scarlatti or the "Presto" of Bach's "Italian Concerto", or is one to assume that tempi were slower in their era than ours?
Always an interesting question over instruments. The Italian instruments, which Scarlatti would have known both in Italy and Spain, were very, very different from the northern European ones (Flemish/French, and by derivation, late English). There is no doubt that one could 'shift' on an Italian (single manual, 2x8 (very rarely 2x8 1x4. Having said that, I've heard Pinnock motoring on a Dulcken copy. Regards, Paul :-)
I would easily put this interpretation over sokolov's. Although i consider him to be the most technically advanced pianist of today. Keep up the good work.
Nicely done, tormus! Seems to me to be a very authentic tempo. Great instrument, too. You might want to start ornaments right on the beat; I think you'll get an even more authentic sound.
I can never get over how small harpsichord keys are.
Tenifus 1 year ago
Delightful congratulations thank you for sharing
Marianofrv 1 year ago
Merci Philippe Meyer
ytbelo 1 year ago
It's great to hear Couperin's celebrated piece on an original-style instrument !
gerardbedecarter 2 years ago
AMAZING.
happyskywhite 2 years ago
Can someone help me please? what is the musical texture of " Tic-Toc-Choc" ?
heregleyee 2 years ago
It is two part writing; one part for the upper manual and one part for the lower manual with the exception of the cadences at the end of each section.
tormus1 2 years ago
excelentedigitacion, muy bueno!
piriapolis2008 2 years ago
es mucho mejor sokolov jajaja
Elcomunisto 2 years ago
u're stupid!
At the Couperin time it wasn't the piano.
This piece it was written just for the harpsichord!
Guilmant512 2 years ago
it looks so fun to press one of those keys!!!
ufayad 3 years ago 2
This is so interesting! I'm learning to play this on harp and my teacher suggested I listen to it on harpsichord-wow!
beckyharp 3 years ago
This is nitpicking, but perhaps the problem here is that the tempo is not STEADY, i.e. there is lot of disconcerting rubato. Don't know. It's good to hear this and Sokolov's - they're both a million miles better than I could manage!
miocaroadone 3 years ago
well, yes, it should go some faster... but stupid of you mentioning Sokolov... since this is an early music instrument and performance... and NEVER NEVER mix modern performed standarized music styles and musicians with early music.... urrgghh
KarlAmade 3 years ago
There is much out there that is historically-informed and yet which misses the essence of the music. Which is most important: an appropriate tempo, an appropriate timbre, or capturing the spirit? Cheers.
xgianpatrick 3 years ago 7
Well, without an appropriate tempo and an appropriate timbre, it's impossible to capture the spirit. However, a great artist such as Sokolov can occasionally create the right timbre on the wrong instrument; he does pretty well with this movement, I must say. And that's high praise coming from me--I'm a harpsichordist myself.
BethDiane 3 years ago
I would have to say that incorrect playing is always incorrect playing--blunders are blunders, universally (such as making breaks in phrases on account of incorrect fingering). Considering that--particularly in Baroque music--virtually all 'spirit' is in the composition itself. That said, I would consider tempo to be both by far and self-evidently the most important in 'capturing spirit', provided, obviously, that the music is otherwise played 'correctly'.
dolofonos 3 years ago 2
@xgianpatrick It's all important, tempo, timbre, and spirit. There is much out there non-historically-informed that doesn't capture the spirit. (Bachscholar's Scarlatti K 1.) Glenn Gould played the A minor invention Presto (too fast), and Toccata E minor Partita (too slow). One works, one doesn't.
Renshen1957 1 year ago
Good, but i must say it is way to slow.
coaster1000 3 years ago
This is a harpsichord, not a piano
ricercarehor 3 years ago 3
OK... and what's that got to do with the comment? If anything, on the harpsichord it can (should?) be played even faster.
jlaurson 3 years ago
I think it is not a harpsichord. It is a clavichord.
epor324 3 years ago
interesting, interesting... say a bit more please :-)
singer1924 3 years ago
This is a Harpsichord, built in Sydney Australia. Double manual clavichords are rarer than Hens teeth and sound completely different.
Renshen1957 2 years ago 3
just see that.../watch?v=pR6kpZzOGdo
Ntalikeris666 3 years ago
do you think you could play any slower? haha jk...very good playing
shyguy8790 3 years ago
playing really fast is not a good idea on most old instruments. they start sounding like a tin can filled with nails, rolling down a stony hill. his tempo is good. anything faster, and it would sound terrible.
Timrath 3 years ago
Rubbish. Any well restored harpsichord can take any speed a performer can dole out. And with the quick decay, the music can take it, too.
jlaurson 3 years ago
You've got that right, though, almost better said: the harpsichord can take the music. My point being that instrument most commonly used to play ante-Romantic keyboard music--the modern piano--cannot truly.
dolofonos 3 years ago
his tempo is fine. playing faster than that would be ill-advised. with those old instruments, if you play too fast, they sound like tin cans filled with nails, rolling down a stony hillside. tempo depends strongly on what instrument you're playing on. what sounds nice on a piano, can easily sound awful on an organ, cembalo, or electronic keyboard.
Timrath 3 years ago 2
Gosh, how did Scarlatti negotiate sonatas on his harpsichord when he wished the tempo to be "Prestissimo" as in K. 517, for instance? I notice that the instrument on which this artist plays was made in 1987. Could it be relied upon to play fast pieces by Scarlatti or the "Presto" of Bach's "Italian Concerto", or is one to assume that tempi were slower in their era than ours?
wandalewlandowska 3 years ago
Always an interesting question over instruments. The Italian instruments, which Scarlatti would have known both in Italy and Spain, were very, very different from the northern European ones (Flemish/French, and by derivation, late English). There is no doubt that one could 'shift' on an Italian (single manual, 2x8 (very rarely 2x8 1x4. Having said that, I've heard Pinnock motoring on a Dulcken copy. Regards, Paul :-)
marsvltor2 3 years ago
@Timrath And the converse is true about what sounds nice on an organ, harpsichord, et al can sound horrible on the piano.
Renshen1957 1 year ago
Absolutely enchanting, so delicate what a beautiful melody, very haunting.
cookiebaroness 4 years ago 3
Loved it!
GrotrianSeiler 4 years ago 2
I would easily put this interpretation over sokolov's. Although i consider him to be the most technically advanced pianist of today. Keep up the good work.
MadKabwit 4 years ago
Again, nice playing. This is a good example of a "piece croisse", one that is unique in string keyboard literature.
fnersch 4 years ago 3
Good playing.
MusicPredominates 4 years ago 3
I love this so much!! When I'm at work I just imagine this piece in my head, makes my day so enjoyable!!
7soc47 4 years ago 4
Loved this! Thank you.
FritzieCarney 4 years ago
Thanks! That was delightful.
kiptw 4 years ago 2
Nicely done, tormus! Seems to me to be a very authentic tempo. Great instrument, too. You might want to start ornaments right on the beat; I think you'll get an even more authentic sound.
EmdrGreg 4 years ago 2
You'll really enjoy Sokolov's performance of this!!
BettyCope 4 years ago 2
Bravo!
musiclover63 4 years ago
AWESOME Vidio and skill. Thanks for sharing.
Raymondo30837 5 years ago
yummi..sweet music !!
anormalius 5 years ago
I have heard this piece 2 or 3 times before, but have never enjoyed it so much.
mercoid 5 years ago
How fascinating to see close up the skill required and the practice to produce this perpetual motion of delight. Bravo.
cookiebaroness 5 years ago