@animaljp3 You are a fucking idiot. PLEASE, I BEG YOU. Research your information, watch Planet dinosaur. We haven't even found spino's arms. Spinosaurus is NOTHING like a bear, so stop fucking comparing it to one.
@FrenchBulldogWinston "watch monsters resserected", but both are documenterys. spinos CLAW are like half a grizzly bear claw. you have not said why both claws are not alike
@animaljp3 Theres your problem, monsters ressurected is horribly innacurate and is reconized as the worst dinosaur documentary ever made. Everything said about the animal is wrong. Ask anybody who isnt an idiot/spino fanboy. Planet Dinosaur actually is accurate and I reccomend you see it.
@animaljp3 You are a fnucking idiot. PLEASE, I BEG YOU. Research your information and stop comparing Spinosaurus to a grizzly bear as they are nothing alike.
@animaljp3 "soino was 3 times the size of a 2 ton bite force crocodile with same teeth. "weak" could be a couple of tons." How many times must I explain the major flaws to your inaccurate analogy?
Its teeth are similar to crocs only because they are conical teeth which means they were pointed straight and non-serrated(that's about it) yet very hollowed. They are NOT related to crocs and have completely different designs, structures, biology and anatomy.
@animaljp3 you keep putting crappy nonsense about spinosaurus. Spinosaurus had GHARIAL mouth. Designed to grip and hold. And you just fucked up with the size.
@FrenchBulldogWinston it was as long as a t rex skull. It was about 1/3 of thickness of t rex, giving it 1 1/2 tons. A gharial has a much thiner and longer snout. clawing is smacking. spino could go for t rex neck.
@animaljp3 I highly doubt spino could or would do anything to the thick muscular neck of rex wrapped in a thick hide. As I already stated, Jp's neck snap, is just an impossible made up holly wood movie with zero support by any means like the entire series(I even explained how that's painstakingly impossible). Spino's jaws were weak and with an elongated snout like spino's would mean even weaker and isn't going to do much with thin hollowed teeth.
@animaljp3 Rex had a very unique thick muscular neck with a thick hide wrapped around it and that has nothing to do with "size". For example, carcharodontosaurus and giganotosaurus were both very slightly larger creatures yet heir necks were slender and thin. Look at an actual spino's neck, even thinner and elongated.
And I usest to be a spino fan but it hit me you can't compare these to, spino was built for it's time period as of Rex! Rex Never hunted large prey! It wasnt built for it! It hunted medium size armored prey! Aminals that could defend themselves that's why Rex was the most advance theropod! It's huge bite force came handy in this time period to kill armored animals with one fatal bite! But t-Rex was also a scavenger!! An most of it's meals were scavenged!
@barcode0954 well in all honesty, you're 100% wrong on that(at least for the most part)
Rex was not a straight scavenger nor were most of its meals(the scavenger theorist claims have all been proven wrong and irrelevant to the very survival of it). Rex did went after large land prey but not giant(even giga went in packs to hunt down baby sauropods) however they went in larger packs depending on their ages. Spino could only eat small fish or through a small theory, small dinos as a side option.
@barcode0954 and to think a 60ft 20ft at the hip, 8-12ton spinosaurus at just fish? thats wrong! it could never survive on fish alone, and its already been prooven with baryonyx that spinosaurs in general are way more capable of taking out meduim size prey! since they found iquandon remains in a baryonx! and baryonx is only 20-30ft so your telling me a 60ft spino only eats fish??? i highly doubt that!
@barcode0954 Actually the onlyspino ever found was around 55ft(it was only theorized to be 60ft). Spino had a long neck and snout filled with weak hollowed fish spearing teeth, weak jaws and the arms are actually far smaller then Jp3... hunting even medium dinos would have been impossible for a it. It was estimated that there a were large bounty of fish at the time and spino did in fact lived at wet lands at prehistoric Egypt. Baryonyx doesn't really proves anything, it's also a distant cousin.
@TopPhilosopher1 of course JP3 Made spino look like a apex of apex predators, which its not, but baryonyx body frame, and structure are similar to spinos!(except the spino) including the JAW, and if a baryonx can kill prey like iguandon, then im sure spino can, and the week jaw thing thats a opinion, and has not been fully prooven the fish it prey on were large fish if anything spino had a nice decent bite force!
@barcode0954 Well actually baryonyx is a far different dino that's actually a far distant cousin of spino(even the frames are are actually quite different despite similarities due to being spinosaurids) also that was only theorized for baryonyx, however with all the flaw designs of spino, it wouldn't even went after medium dinos. Spino had a slender narrow snout and small jaws with hollowed teeth, I don't think that would mean it had much of a powerful bite especially to take down medium prey.
@TopPhilosopher1 Spino had diffrent teeth shape. Much thicker and not as recurved. Have you looked at any spino skulls lately? NO ANIMAL TEETH ARE HOLLOW. arms could hold teeth rip.
@animaljp3 I'm beginning to question if YOU had seen actual spino teeth. Its teeth are at 5in to 6in at maximum and that's just its largest TWO sabers, the rest are far smaller. Its teeth are not thick, they are some of the most thinnest of the large theropods, in fact, perfectly suited for spearing fish. Also, spino's skull is very narrow, at least three times thnner then Jp's depictions.
@animaljp3 You've not into READING or LISTENING nor even RESEARCHING are you?
"arms could hold teeth rip" We just had a conversation about that on another video where I just proved that assumption wrong. Its jaws were very weak with an overly elongated narrow snout with hollowed teeth. It's arms are still shorter and thinner then Jp and its hands and claws are not design to grip.
@animaljp3 Plus, if you look at an actual spino, you explicitly notice how the arms aren't as long as its neck and snout, they don't eve compare and unless it can flex that elongated snout curved downward, move its neck to a snapping point without instant death and force its arms that were unable to grip due to hand and claw designs to a dislocating breaking point, that wouldn't be possible by any standards.
@animaljp3 Spino's only usage for its arms were to simply smack NOT claw or grip prey. However, rex has a impact resistant skull design for major impacts of which can easily take one the hardest of spino blows.
@animaljp3 First of all, spino is by no means built like a "bear" and second of all, spino's neck and snout are too lone compared to spino's arms, plus, its claw and hand designs were not built to grip.
"claws could go for neck and chest." Nothing even suggests that and spino's claws would not go deep enough as for only the curved tips would which wouldn't do much. Spino only used its claws to cut apart dead fish, it was blunt based attacks that spino actually used its arms for.
@TopPhilosopher1 The claws are bearlike. In fact, spinos are sharper. to round eadges go through flesh liss easier than one sharp. SPINO WOULD SWALLOW FISH WHOLE.."spinos arms and neck are longer than its arms" would mean it did not shread fish. they were still long enough to get swips.
@animaljp3 "spinos arms and neck are longer than its arms" It's nice that you read my content and actually researched it but "The claws are bearlike" is false. Bear claws are actually designed to dig which allows it to make dens, dig for roots, etc which is highly important for them. Spino's claws are long thin and yet a bit curved on the tip claws, the tips were actually very sharp and only those tips would cut flesh which clearly isn't an effective attacking tool but rather to cut up carcasses
@animaljp3 "The whole claw in both spino and bears would be used." Clearly you either have zero idea on how claws work or just delusional. Spino's claws were not designed, built not even logically capable of using it entire claws. Only curved tips would, as for the rest would not. Also, bears don't use their entire claws either (which are nothing like spino's).
@animaljp3 You're forgetting that spino's claws were not built nor design to penetrate through flesh. The only parts of their claws that would cut through is only the curved tips which isn't much to large or medium land prey.
@animaljp3 That's not true, for example, I have nails on the tips of my fingers but that doesn't mean if I smack someone, I'll be digging my nails in their skin.
@TopPhilosopher1 you are not nearly strong enough to even bite through skin or push nails through. Also, you nails are not attached to bone so they would be pryed out if under enough force.
@animaljp3 That's not true, I can cut skin iif I had nails long enough. To slap with a palm, as for any creature, doesn't necessarily require the claws. the way spino's claws are positioned and their design were not meant to grip nor be very effective weapons.
Planet Dinosaur 2011, It proved Spino was indeed a fish-eater most of the time.. That was not only what it's prey was but that was where it spent most of time hunting.. An when the ponds an lakes dried up Spino would scavenge kills from other predators, an occasionally hunted when food was needed
I am not down playing Spino, It's a cool Dino, but even if the 2 met they wouldn't fight..The T-Rex would be wounded an Spino would be Killed.
@XxComablackxX1937 Proved? Ha it's evidence at best and even that isn't too dead on. And I find it funny how you say you're not down playing spino when you go around page to page saying this stuff like a butthurt fan.
@TopPhilosopher1 dont be a fanboy rex wasnt built for saurpod like prey, it was not as manuverable as allo or giga! it was a predator/scavenger and most of its meals were scavenged, nearly all large predators with the exceptions of raptors and spinosaurs who eat fish! the rexs meals were scavenged! and the prey that t-rex fed on were well armored to defend themeselves, and alot time t-rex retreated!
@barcode0954 Half true, MOST of rex's meals were hunted(this was proven) scavenging would actually be the least likely due to other smaller dinos being able to find them and devourer them more then 60% faster then rex. Allo were much more maneuverable but they were barely half the size as rex while giga was only slightly which is why they only went after sick smaller sauropods.
Scavenging was just an option for rex, not the main diet.
Wow some of you guys say Trex and spinosaurus were the apex predator of all time wrong the greatest apex predator were marine animals ! Prehistoric whales, meg, lio,krono, mosasurus, prehistoric crocodiles were apex,
ALSO EVERYONE TRYING TO DEFEND THE SPINO SAYING THAT ITS HARD SKIN COULD PROTECT IT.NO,IT WOULD NOT.NOT AGAINST A T-REX BITING ITS NECK ITS FULL FORCE.
No, espinossauros's teeth weren't built to crush like the tiranossaurus rex's teeth, however they were built for something else, espinossauros's teeth (very sharp) were built to slice trough meat creating great, deep wounds, and yes, espinossauros wasen't only a fish eater as it was also carnivore, plus its claws were huge, designed to create maximum damage while trex has arms that can't even get to his mouth. Really... the only thing that trex has an adventage on is jaw streght, nothing more.
to clone them. That could be 50 years from now. We all love dinosaurs, so why can't we just stick together like we used to. Stop the fighting and lets get on with our real lives. We must stop living in the past.
What is the point of fighting guys. Yes, I do favor Spinosaurus but just because he is cool. The thing is, why are we fighting. Jurassic Park 3 is science fiction, just like any alien or monster movie. We seem to forget that it was fake. The fight between the two groups for spino and rex are going to fight forever. Lets get this straight: Everyone is entitled to their opinion. The only way for anyone to find out which would win is when either the time machine is created or enough DNA is found
Every1 knows T-Rex won this fight the minute he got his mouth around Spino's neck. It was over..
Not to mention since fact's are in an we know a lot more about Spino it is proven Spinosaurus could not kill a T-Rex.. it's diet was mostly fish an small land Dino's an didn't have the teeth or jaw power an structure to handle a Tyrannosaurus.
So with that said, This movie blows an gave a very unrealistic view on Spino.
A insult to Paleontology an Jack Horner should be shot.
My husband is a palietologist, and he says this fight was CLEARLY RIGGED!
Rex had the STRONGEST bite force in the dinosaur world-the moment Spino was in his jaw-it would of been over! Plus A dinosaur (like spino) which was MADE for hunting small dinosaurs and fish-would have NOT been able to kill T-rex with his lame jaws-his biteforce is NOTHING compared to a Rex!
Reading these comments, Im 28 and i personally perfer the T-Rex over Spino... I also may not be anywhere near a dinosaur expert or claim to be.
But the Rex in this movie wasnt an adult, Also a bite to the neck of a spino from a sub-adult rex would more likely mean death.
If spino somehow managed to get out of such a powerful jaw muscle, An kill a T-Rex, the bacteria from the Rex would end up killing the spino within hour's if it didnt bleed to death.
@FutureSimpsons Spino is NOT powerful. it was made for small dinos and fish. T Rex was smaller but tougher. It will own Spino anyday and I'm not just saying that because Im a Rex fan Im saying this because Ive got 10 palietologist friends who who say: If a Spinosarus even attempted to bite a Rex its teeth would break off and it will die. Dude you only like Spino because of the JP spino. Rather like Shitosaurious.
@FutureSimpsons fuck you!!!! your fucking studies? your an asshole! they only found a CLAW and you think it will beat T Rex? your a fucking ass bang you fucking shithead! fuck you! sardine fucking shithead! fucking floppin and floppin in your asshole, im gonna take it out, jam it in your rear end, and stick it in your stagola!!!! you fuckface!
@FutureSimpsons your 9 right?Cause you know nothing about dinosaurs.Im going down reading the comments and the only really stupid ones that stand out are yours saying stuff about dinosaurs trying to sound like a know it all .
Okay! see that idiots?! 12-19 fucking TONS!!! Where is your 6.7 ton tyrannosaur NOW!?!? i bet Idiots will still blindly bitch about obvious irrefutable facts cos most ppl are JUST THAT STUPID.
now here's another specimen (Subadult -i.e. not even full grown and it's TWICE as heavy as the LARGEST tyrannosaur.)
Let me post the fucking ANALYSIS so all you STUPID KID WANNABE PALAEONTOLOGISTS WILL SHUT THE DAMN FUCK UP and LISTEN when your superiors are talking... Here is the largest CONFIRMED specimen of Tyrannosaurus specimen FMNH PR2081 a.k.a. Sue ('Celeste' is reported 10% according to J. Horner larger but no measurements to confirm this have been provided.)
Guys listen in real life IF spinosaurs and T-Rex meet which would never happen T-Rex would kill the spinosaurs with a neck snapping bite.Remember guys this is a movie maybe they wanted another dinosaur besides T-Rex. at lest T-Rex was in it Still i wish T-Rex killed spino
Spinosaurus was much larger than Tyrannosaurus Rex, so my guess is Spinosaurus would win. There are too many fanbois with an emotional attachment to Tyrannosaurs.
i dont "hate" tyrannosaurs, but this fanboism is fucking ridiculous. i bet most of those arguing over how "T-rex" should have won are fucking 8-15 yr olds
u have no idea how wrong u are, geez, i wish people knew the facts before commenting, let me fill u in, spino was longer and taller, but rex outwieghed spino by 4 tons! rex was smarter, had huge bite force, bone crushing teeth, and a thick neck, were as spino had long narrow thin neck, with tiny needle teeth meant for eating fish.
NO IT DIDNT! moron! ... STUPID RETARD MORON CUNT TRYING TO TEACH ME SHIT.. STFU IDIOT. Even modelling the spinosaur's dorsal vertebrae as a spine it is about 4-6 tonnes BIGGER Than a damn Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Modelling the dorsal spines as a fleshy hump the spinosaurus is about 10 tonnes heavier! (about TWICE the weight!)
can't believe this FUCKTARD WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT AmericanMan44 dared to say TO ME "u have no idea how wrong u are, geez, i wish people knew the facts before commenting," I just disproved your shit right here on YOUTUBE! OWN3D!!! now we see who mouthed off without knowing the facts, and to make matters worse YOU BITCHED ABOUT PPL COMMENTING WITHOUT KNOWING THE FACTS.. and I jsut proved ur the fuckhead commenting without knowing SHIT, blind fucktard.
...c mon...SPINO cant beat t rex....its a fisher..while t rex is a skilled hunter....t rex has been in more battles than spino...spino may be huge...that makes him more clumsy....40 000 pounds of bite force for t rex....spinos jaw wasnt built for killing other animals..it will snap of anyway
@Wolfnx spino didnt win because of bite force,he won because he had longer arms and used them to hold t-rex down while he CRACKED HIS NECK.And im preety sure u would die if u cracked your neck.So spino could have won but they could never meet.why is every body a spino hater.
@megaraptor456 I don't hate spino but I do not like idiots. One thing is, a Spino's wrist configuration would not allow it make alot of movement if you actually look at the bones and how they work. So "cracking" the Rex's neck is impossible. AS well, the fact the T-Rex's neck is made of pure muscle makes it nearly impossible for Spino to break its neck.
@seankyle92 well, Tyrannosaurs was probably scavenger so your opinion is bullshit. Maybe read something about Spino and T-Rex - then write things like this. The fact that Spino ate fish doesn't mean that he wasn't able to fight. End remember tha JP dinosaurus are mutated.
@Resvain you wouldnt know either u aint God. many things are just theory and give it a rest its been a year. you fuckin nerd.. even ur comments are full of 'probably' how does it make mine bullshit. and i was speculating since they dont live in the same era. go brag bout ur dino knowledge to ur girl if u have one. btw, i have cuz i aint a fuckin child like u kid.
@darth09er Since a T-Rex has an incredible brain, strong jaws, fast legs, great eyesight, and strong sense of smell, it HAS to be a scavenger. Your the fucking dumbass.
@MrTobyCure hm incredible brain,strong jaws,fast legs.great eyesightand a strong sense of smell? sounds like a hunter to me.Get your facts right then come back here
@wazzupnick1 The legs are fast for its size since it can carry such a heavy weight at a speed of 15mph which is faster than most of of its prey items. But becuz of predators having a chance of 9 out of 10 failing the attempt to make a successful kill makes it possible it scavenged, but it doesn't make it a complete scavenger becuz of this. I'd like to hear what you say about this.
@MrTobyCure Well heres what i think on this.If the t-rex failed at a hunt,i dont think it would take it long to find another meal.But if it could not find a meal i also think it would resort to trying to scavage.I think the t-rex was a excellent hunter made for taking down prey but i think it would eat anything with meat on it if it was famished enough.
@wazzupnick1 I would highly recommend this to everyone. I do believe if the T-Rex failed at a hunt it would try again, but if it was too hard then I bet it would scavenge to survive. It has all the perfect capabilities as a hunter, but those abilities are perfect for a scavenger as well. You really have to look at it. Lions take hyena kills only becuz they failed on hunting down their own so they scavenge off of hyena kills and vice-versa.
@wazzupnick1 . Scavengers like buzzards must use eyesight to be able to identify a dead carcass, smell isn't the only sense for a scavenger. Smell is a powerful tool for scavengers, but it all depends on what perspective the animal has, like T-Rex. I bet that eyesight definitely helped it identify threats if there were any to oppose it if it had to scavenge.
@wazzupnick1 . But T-Rex would use all of its senses to its ability as a hunter, it had to for it to be able to be such a great hunter and the top of its food chain.
@wazzupnick1 Wow. I just explained to you on how it is both a hunter and scavenger... -_- You stun me. Pay attention more often that way you can actually put down something that I never said. I said it was both a scavenger and a hunter.
@MrTobyCure Since a T-Rex has an incredible brain, strong jaws, fast legs, great eyesight, and strong sense of smell, it HAS to be a scavenger. Your the fucking dumbass.
All predators are Scavenger's, there are so many facts proving T-Rex was not a pure scavenger. This debate needs to end...
There is no logical way in hell such a large an powerful animal could survive being a pure scavenger, T-Rex was the African Male Lion of today...
Lions steal from Hyena's, Cheetahs, many other predators but they are very successful hunters, Id dare you to go up to a Wild Lion an call him a Scavenger.
@seankyle92 hahhahahhahhaa, funny. Maybe first think, then write. Nerd.... why? Dino knowledge.... WHAT A SHAME! And you definitely act like a fuckin child who pretend adult. But yeah, good for you
@mitch9877 since you like sucking jack honer's dick and admire his biased views, would u think it be logical if t rex was to survive on just carcass alone? wow a lame excuse to have strong jaws, fast legs and brain similar to a crocodile(which is a scavenger and also predator). wait u cnt answer it cuz u love him too much.
@seankyle92 i never said i like jack horner i hate jack horner because he hates trex and for all i know your a troll i left a comment telling you to tell that to jack horner because you act like the person who made this video is responsible for jurrasic park 3 so whatever i dont care what you think about me by the way you fail at life
@seankyle92 by the way i never mentioned spino in my comment dumbass and next time read my comment dont just make an excuse to say bullshit about spino and trex so how about you go troll on someone else for a change
Jack Horner is a 1 sided idiot, who acts like a Child because T-Rex hunted an killed his favorite Dinosaur..... That guy is a fucking joke to paleontology esp his opinion on T-Rex which has been been proven FALSE. T-Rex was no more Scavenger then Giga, Spino, or Allosaurus an thats a fact.
Seriously Dinosaur George knows more then that Idiot Horner an actually gives solid facts behind his thought's unlike Horny.
That guy needs to retire, he really fucked up JP3 with his opinion
@seankyle92 The Thing with more Advantages Most Of The Time Will Win, But it also depends on how they use it. The Spinyosaurus has Longer Arms, Bigger Body, Just as Strong, Bigger Mouth, Faster, and Amphibious Traits. The Spinyosaurus is Superior on Land and Somewhat Superior in Water [That huge Long Fish Dino would Eat it.].And Also the Spinyosaurus is a killer & isn't as clumsy as The T-Rex [because it can walk on 4 legs].
Spinosaurus was the LARGEST predator to ever walk the earth, mostly due to it's sail which was attached directly to it's Spine.
It was built lighter then T-Rex an it's jaws were built for holding onto fish, an its a proven FACT Spino could not move his arms like that to break the T-Rex's neck, much-less survive a direct bite to the neck from a T-Rex.
Spino might be large, but it's still a bitch boy next to the king ''T-Rex'' an probably isn't even a match for Giganotosaurus.
Well, for you guys information they couldn't kill eachother even if they wanted to spino lived in africa 100 million years ago t-rex in north america 75 million years ago! Stop with the bullshit crap about who would win the spino was the main dino in the movie anyways.
Swanton987 is actually right. T-rex is built for taking down MUCH larger and more dangerous prey than Spinosaurus probably even saw in it's life . . . all scientists have ever found in it's fossilized stomach are fish and young dinosaurs.
T-rex would have murded this thing in a real fight, and that makes this scene complete bullshit. Definitely ruined the movie for me, haha.
to make since to alotta ppl there is no possible way spino could have won....he was not made for taking down a t rex...he was more of a aquatic hunter....when t rex bit him spino would have later on died of infection since the mouth of the trex is like the mouth of he present day komodo dragon...so either way taht spino would have been pushing up daisys
To make since to you fucking swanton987, IT WAS THE FUCKING MOVIE THAT DECIDED THAT THE SPINO WON. Obviusly jurassic park wanted a dinosaur to be a star instead of the t-rex like in the last 2 movies. You retard.
wait another your mama joke.....hmm how do u like this....while you were making up yourmama jokes i was carving my name inside your moms uterus while she was giving a poodle oral sex...
Yea because basing facts on this piece of garbage is right.... already been proven by paleontology since this movie Spino can not beat a T-Rex... an T-Rex still holds the title as King of the Dinosaur's, not this fish-eater
Não sei porque lamentável... como ter certeza que um T.rex era capaz de abater um Spinosaurus ou não? A teoria de Jack Horner (paleontólogo auxiliador de Jurassic Park) prova cada vez mais que o T.rex era necrófago. Eu sei que o crânio do Spinosaurus era adaptado para pesca e blá blá blá... mas de acordo com as novas descobertas ele podia medir de 16 - 18 metros de comprimento e o T.rex media aproximadamente 12m de comprimento e uns 5m de altura.
This has been flagged as spam show
THINK GRIZZLY BEARS FOR THE CLAW. LONG AND HAVE SMALL TIPS. THE WHOLE CLAW IS USED
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 You are a fucking idiot. PLEASE, I BEG YOU. Research your information, watch Planet dinosaur. We haven't even found spino's arms. Spinosaurus is NOTHING like a bear, so stop fucking comparing it to one.
FrenchBulldogWinston 1 month ago
@FrenchBulldogWinston "watch monsters resserected", but both are documenterys. spinos CLAW are like half a grizzly bear claw. you have not said why both claws are not alike
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Theres your problem, monsters ressurected is horribly innacurate and is reconized as the worst dinosaur documentary ever made. Everything said about the animal is wrong. Ask anybody who isnt an idiot/spino fanboy. Planet Dinosaur actually is accurate and I reccomend you see it.
FrenchBulldogWinston 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Better yet, go to the monsters ressurected videos and look the top comments.
FrenchBulldogWinston 1 month ago
@animaljp3 You are a fnucking idiot. PLEASE, I BEG YOU. Research your information and stop comparing Spinosaurus to a grizzly bear as they are nothing alike.
FrenchBulldogWinston 1 month ago
soino was 3 times the size of a 2 ton bite force crocodile with same teeth. "weak" could be a couple of tons.
animaljp3 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animaljp3 "soino was 3 times the size of a 2 ton bite force crocodile with same teeth. "weak" could be a couple of tons." How many times must I explain the major flaws to your inaccurate analogy?
Its teeth are similar to crocs only because they are conical teeth which means they were pointed straight and non-serrated(that's about it) yet very hollowed. They are NOT related to crocs and have completely different designs, structures, biology and anatomy.
Where is this coming from?
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@animaljp3 you keep putting crappy nonsense about spinosaurus. Spinosaurus had GHARIAL mouth. Designed to grip and hold. And you just fucked up with the size.
FrenchBulldogWinston 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FrenchBulldogWinston it was as long as a t rex skull. It was about 1/3 of thickness of t rex, giving it 1 1/2 tons. A gharial has a much thiner and longer snout. clawing is smacking. spino could go for t rex neck.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 I highly doubt spino could or would do anything to the thick muscular neck of rex wrapped in a thick hide. As I already stated, Jp's neck snap, is just an impossible made up holly wood movie with zero support by any means like the entire series(I even explained how that's painstakingly impossible). Spino's jaws were weak and with an elongated snout like spino's would mean even weaker and isn't going to do much with thin hollowed teeth.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 HOW DID T REX HAVE ARMOR ON ITS NECK?? MUSC LES ARE THE SAME DENSITY, T REX JUST HAD MORE FOR ITS SIZE.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Rex had a very unique thick muscular neck with a thick hide wrapped around it and that has nothing to do with "size". For example, carcharodontosaurus and giganotosaurus were both very slightly larger creatures yet heir necks were slender and thin. Look at an actual spino's neck, even thinner and elongated.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@FrenchBulldogWinston EXCACTLY. A MOUTH TO GRIP AND HOLD. Gharials have a mouth 1/3 of the size of their body. how was spino that weak in jaws.
animaljp3 1 month ago
And I usest to be a spino fan but it hit me you can't compare these to, spino was built for it's time period as of Rex! Rex Never hunted large prey! It wasnt built for it! It hunted medium size armored prey! Aminals that could defend themselves that's why Rex was the most advance theropod! It's huge bite force came handy in this time period to kill armored animals with one fatal bite! But t-Rex was also a scavenger!! An most of it's meals were scavenged!
barcode0954 6 months ago
@barcode0954 yes thank
TheYamato101 6 months ago
@barcode0954 well in all honesty, you're 100% wrong on that(at least for the most part)
Rex was not a straight scavenger nor were most of its meals(the scavenger theorist claims have all been proven wrong and irrelevant to the very survival of it). Rex did went after large land prey but not giant(even giga went in packs to hunt down baby sauropods) however they went in larger packs depending on their ages. Spino could only eat small fish or through a small theory, small dinos as a side option.
TopPhilosopher1 5 months ago
Comment removed
barcode0954 5 months ago
@barcode0954 and to think a 60ft 20ft at the hip, 8-12ton spinosaurus at just fish? thats wrong! it could never survive on fish alone, and its already been prooven with baryonyx that spinosaurs in general are way more capable of taking out meduim size prey! since they found iquandon remains in a baryonx! and baryonx is only 20-30ft so your telling me a 60ft spino only eats fish??? i highly doubt that!
barcode0954 5 months ago
@barcode0954 Actually the onlyspino ever found was around 55ft(it was only theorized to be 60ft). Spino had a long neck and snout filled with weak hollowed fish spearing teeth, weak jaws and the arms are actually far smaller then Jp3... hunting even medium dinos would have been impossible for a it. It was estimated that there a were large bounty of fish at the time and spino did in fact lived at wet lands at prehistoric Egypt. Baryonyx doesn't really proves anything, it's also a distant cousin.
TopPhilosopher1 5 months ago
@TopPhilosopher1 of course JP3 Made spino look like a apex of apex predators, which its not, but baryonyx body frame, and structure are similar to spinos!(except the spino) including the JAW, and if a baryonx can kill prey like iguandon, then im sure spino can, and the week jaw thing thats a opinion, and has not been fully prooven the fish it prey on were large fish if anything spino had a nice decent bite force!
barcode0954 5 months ago
@barcode0954 (with exception of the spine)*
barcode0954 5 months ago
@barcode0954 Well actually baryonyx is a far different dino that's actually a far distant cousin of spino(even the frames are are actually quite different despite similarities due to being spinosaurids) also that was only theorized for baryonyx, however with all the flaw designs of spino, it wouldn't even went after medium dinos. Spino had a slender narrow snout and small jaws with hollowed teeth, I don't think that would mean it had much of a powerful bite especially to take down medium prey.
TopPhilosopher1 5 months ago
@TopPhilosopher1 Spino had diffrent teeth shape. Much thicker and not as recurved. Have you looked at any spino skulls lately? NO ANIMAL TEETH ARE HOLLOW. arms could hold teeth rip.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 I'm beginning to question if YOU had seen actual spino teeth. Its teeth are at 5in to 6in at maximum and that's just its largest TWO sabers, the rest are far smaller. Its teeth are not thick, they are some of the most thinnest of the large theropods, in fact, perfectly suited for spearing fish. Also, spino's skull is very narrow, at least three times thnner then Jp's depictions.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animaljp3 You've not into READING or LISTENING nor even RESEARCHING are you?
"arms could hold teeth rip" We just had a conversation about that on another video where I just proved that assumption wrong. Its jaws were very weak with an overly elongated narrow snout with hollowed teeth. It's arms are still shorter and thinner then Jp and its hands and claws are not design to grip.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Plus, if you look at an actual spino, you explicitly notice how the arms aren't as long as its neck and snout, they don't eve compare and unless it can flex that elongated snout curved downward, move its neck to a snapping point without instant death and force its arms that were unable to grip due to hand and claw designs to a dislocating breaking point, that wouldn't be possible by any standards.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Spino's only usage for its arms were to simply smack NOT claw or grip prey. However, rex has a impact resistant skull design for major impacts of which can easily take one the hardest of spino blows.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TopPhilosopher1 grizzly bears can hold without any curvature in claw. claws could go for neck and chest.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 First of all, spino is by no means built like a "bear" and second of all, spino's neck and snout are too lone compared to spino's arms, plus, its claw and hand designs were not built to grip.
"claws could go for neck and chest." Nothing even suggests that and spino's claws would not go deep enough as for only the curved tips would which wouldn't do much. Spino only used its claws to cut apart dead fish, it was blunt based attacks that spino actually used its arms for.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 The claws are bearlike. In fact, spinos are sharper. to round eadges go through flesh liss easier than one sharp. SPINO WOULD SWALLOW FISH WHOLE.."spinos arms and neck are longer than its arms" would mean it did not shread fish. they were still long enough to get swips.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 "spinos arms and neck are longer than its arms" It's nice that you read my content and actually researched it but "The claws are bearlike" is false. Bear claws are actually designed to dig which allows it to make dens, dig for roots, etc which is highly important for them. Spino's claws are long thin and yet a bit curved on the tip claws, the tips were actually very sharp and only those tips would cut flesh which clearly isn't an effective attacking tool but rather to cut up carcasses
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@animaljp3 It is the only logical and strongly proven explanation and answers to why spino had its claws, the way they functioned and used.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 it claws are sharper than a bears. Bears can use their strength to push the claw through flesh.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 The whole claw in both spino and bears would be used.
animaljp3 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animaljp3 "The whole claw in both spino and bears would be used." Clearly you either have zero idea on how claws work or just delusional. Spino's claws were not designed, built not even logically capable of using it entire claws. Only curved tips would, as for the rest would not. Also, bears don't use their entire claws either (which are nothing like spino's).
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@animaljp3 You're forgetting that spino's claws were not built nor design to penetrate through flesh. The only parts of their claws that would cut through is only the curved tips which isn't much to large or medium land prey.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 smacking IS clawing
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 That's not true, for example, I have nails on the tips of my fingers but that doesn't mean if I smack someone, I'll be digging my nails in their skin.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 you are not nearly strong enough to even bite through skin or push nails through. Also, you nails are not attached to bone so they would be pryed out if under enough force.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 That's not true, I can cut skin iif I had nails long enough. To slap with a palm, as for any creature, doesn't necessarily require the claws. the way spino's claws are positioned and their design were not meant to grip nor be very effective weapons.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TopPhilosopher1 were they in the skull?
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 If you are going to reply to something, can you make it clear to which one you are replying top and referring.
TopPhilosopher1 1 month ago
@barcode0954
Planet Dinosaur 2011, It proved Spino was indeed a fish-eater most of the time.. That was not only what it's prey was but that was where it spent most of time hunting.. An when the ponds an lakes dried up Spino would scavenge kills from other predators, an occasionally hunted when food was needed
I am not down playing Spino, It's a cool Dino, but even if the 2 met they wouldn't fight..The T-Rex would be wounded an Spino would be Killed.
A death sentence for both predators
XxComablackxX1937 3 months ago
@XxComablackxX1937 Proved? Ha it's evidence at best and even that isn't too dead on. And I find it funny how you say you're not down playing spino when you go around page to page saying this stuff like a butthurt fan.
Katrinaprime 3 months ago
@XxComablackxX1937 No person can PROVE one way or another. With teeth a finger length in thickness, it would kill more.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 ...than just fish
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 without physical evidence
animaljp3 1 month ago
@TopPhilosopher1 dont be a fanboy rex wasnt built for saurpod like prey, it was not as manuverable as allo or giga! it was a predator/scavenger and most of its meals were scavenged, nearly all large predators with the exceptions of raptors and spinosaurs who eat fish! the rexs meals were scavenged! and the prey that t-rex fed on were well armored to defend themeselves, and alot time t-rex retreated!
rex would steal smaller predators kills to eat!
barcode0954 5 months ago
@barcode0954 Half true, MOST of rex's meals were hunted(this was proven) scavenging would actually be the least likely due to other smaller dinos being able to find them and devourer them more then 60% faster then rex. Allo were much more maneuverable but they were barely half the size as rex while giga was only slightly which is why they only went after sick smaller sauropods.
Scavenging was just an option for rex, not the main diet.
TopPhilosopher1 5 months ago
Wow some of you guys say Trex and spinosaurus were the apex predator of all time wrong the greatest apex predator were marine animals ! Prehistoric whales, meg, lio,krono, mosasurus, prehistoric crocodiles were apex,
barcode0954 6 months ago
@barcode0954 Well yes, but t rex and spino were apex predators on land
JR10144 5 months ago
ALSO EVERYONE TRYING TO DEFEND THE SPINO SAYING THAT ITS HARD SKIN COULD PROTECT IT.NO,IT WOULD NOT.NOT AGAINST A T-REX BITING ITS NECK ITS FULL FORCE.
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
No, espinossauros's teeth weren't built to crush like the tiranossaurus rex's teeth, however they were built for something else, espinossauros's teeth (very sharp) were built to slice trough meat creating great, deep wounds, and yes, espinossauros wasen't only a fish eater as it was also carnivore, plus its claws were huge, designed to create maximum damage while trex has arms that can't even get to his mouth. Really... the only thing that trex has an adventage on is jaw streght, nothing more.
HeroeOfPhartia 8 months ago
19 T-REX watched this video....
genrolecaspe 9 months ago
yeah the rex was f**ked when it made that move @ 0:25
lucariofan89 9 months ago
thank u for not showing the snapped neck part. that part was retarded in the movie
ciyoduhkriter 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
T Rex was not a king. Most fame of T Rex was made by marketing because that dinossaur existed where you can call now USA.
alexcetera 10 months ago
Comment removed
alexcetera 10 months ago
@seankyle92 the spino didnt win by biting, it won using its arms to crash the t-rex neck...
WHATYOUTHINKD 10 months ago
I got the movie.I'm gonna be watchin it another time BECAUSE I GOT A STUPID DVD PLAYER!!!!!!!!!
trinaclark74 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
to clone them. That could be 50 years from now. We all love dinosaurs, so why can't we just stick together like we used to. Stop the fighting and lets get on with our real lives. We must stop living in the past.
pokesaurus12 1 year ago
What is the point of fighting guys. Yes, I do favor Spinosaurus but just because he is cool. The thing is, why are we fighting. Jurassic Park 3 is science fiction, just like any alien or monster movie. We seem to forget that it was fake. The fight between the two groups for spino and rex are going to fight forever. Lets get this straight: Everyone is entitled to their opinion. The only way for anyone to find out which would win is when either the time machine is created or enough DNA is found
pokesaurus12 1 year ago
@pokesaurus12. really, they don't need to cuss over dino fights
MegaChallanger 11 months ago
cant oyu mkae a clear one
cf572 1 year ago
Every1 knows T-Rex won this fight the minute he got his mouth around Spino's neck. It was over..
Not to mention since fact's are in an we know a lot more about Spino it is proven Spinosaurus could not kill a T-Rex.. it's diet was mostly fish an small land Dino's an didn't have the teeth or jaw power an structure to handle a Tyrannosaurus.
So with that said, This movie blows an gave a very unrealistic view on Spino.
A insult to Paleontology an Jack Horner should be shot.
XxComablackxX1937 1 year ago
We will never know who win.... I like the Spino better because it has razor shark claws and it can going in water too. IMO I think a spino would win.
Paroder 1 year ago
spino rules!!!!!!!!
24unknown241 1 year ago
@24unknown241 fuck off
MechaRodan659 1 year ago
LOL last thing u hear
"[Neck cracks]"
LMAO!!!!
Shinobi4Jesus 1 year ago
or u could just kick t-rex in the balls really hard.
BananaAppleJuice 1 year ago
My husband is a palietologist, and he says this fight was CLEARLY RIGGED!
Rex had the STRONGEST bite force in the dinosaur world-the moment Spino was in his jaw-it would of been over! Plus A dinosaur (like spino) which was MADE for hunting small dinosaurs and fish-would have NOT been able to kill T-rex with his lame jaws-his biteforce is NOTHING compared to a Rex!
MarHeavenAngel89 1 year ago
Reading these comments, Im 28 and i personally perfer the T-Rex over Spino... I also may not be anywhere near a dinosaur expert or claim to be.
But the Rex in this movie wasnt an adult, Also a bite to the neck of a spino from a sub-adult rex would more likely mean death.
If spino somehow managed to get out of such a powerful jaw muscle, An kill a T-Rex, the bacteria from the Rex would end up killing the spino within hour's if it didnt bleed to death.
So neither animal would prob survive
XxComablackxX1937 2 years ago
i like this scene from Jurassic Park III
FutureSimpsons 2 years ago
@FutureSimpsons the scene is gay t rex should have one if you want a real movie.
thedude23isroblox 2 years ago
No a Spinosaurus would beat a T-Rex even in real life because it is bigger and more powerful.
FutureSimpsons 2 years ago
@FutureSimpsons Spino is NOT powerful. it was made for small dinos and fish. T Rex was smaller but tougher. It will own Spino anyday and I'm not just saying that because Im a Rex fan Im saying this because Ive got 10 palietologist friends who who say: If a Spinosarus even attempted to bite a Rex its teeth would break off and it will die. Dude you only like Spino because of the JP spino. Rather like Shitosaurious.
thedude23isroblox 2 years ago
@thedude23isroblox
mostly i like Velociraptor Spino would crash T-Rex i know this from my research not from Jurassic Park.
FutureSimpsons 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FutureSimpsons fuck you!!!! your fucking studies? your an asshole! they only found a CLAW and you think it will beat T Rex? your a fucking ass bang you fucking shithead! fuck you! sardine fucking shithead! fucking floppin and floppin in your asshole, im gonna take it out, jam it in your rear end, and stick it in your stagola!!!! you fuckface!
thedude23isroblox 1 year ago
Comment removed
thedude23isroblox 1 year ago
@FutureSimpsons you are wrong about that dude.
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@FutureSimpsons
Oh,because it's bigger it would win?
That is by far the most idiotic thing i've heard in a while
If that's the case,a Humpback whale can easily kill a shark because it's bigger
Don't base facts on the worst jurassic park movie ever made.
Also,T-Rex can crush a mini van with its jaws
A spino can barely make holes in the door of a mini van.
MrOTK95 1 year ago
@FutureSimpsons your 9 right?Cause you know nothing about dinosaurs.Im going down reading the comments and the only really stupid ones that stand out are yours saying stuff about dinosaurs trying to sound like a know it all .
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
[MSG #4]
(MNHN SAM 124) (~15.9 m, 9-15 tons) (skull ~2 m) partial premaxillae,
partial maxillae, vomers, dentary fragment (Taquet and Russell 1998)
The largest named theropod, and probably the largest known. It beats the
nearest competitors by several meters, so I really don't see why it's not
more universally thought of as the largest. Even the rumored largest
carcharodontosaurs and tyrannosaurs are smaller. And like Suchomimus, the
holotype is a subadult.
There you go! SUCK ON THAT AmerMan44
rlinfinity 2 years ago
[MSG #4]
Okay! see that idiots?! 12-19 fucking TONS!!! Where is your 6.7 ton tyrannosaur NOW!?!? i bet Idiots will still blindly bitch about obvious irrefutable facts cos most ppl are JUST THAT STUPID.
now here's another specimen (Subadult -i.e. not even full grown and it's TWICE as heavy as the LARGEST tyrannosaur.)
(contd... in next msg).
rlinfinity 2 years ago
@rlinfinity
You idiotic son of a...
19 TONS!
Most sauropods are barely 15 tons
It would've weighed about 8 tons moron
Jesus
Who bases facts on a movie
Next thing i'm gonna hear is that every single monster truck on earth is an autobot.
MrOTK95 1 year ago
STupid cunt. It wasn't based on a movie. That was cutting edge research from palaeontologists. STFU retard.
rlinfinity 1 year ago
Oh,sorry.
But,It wasn;t 19 tons that's just ridicules
i apologize for the insult
MrOTK95 1 year ago
[MSG#1]
Let me post the fucking ANALYSIS so all you STUPID KID WANNABE PALAEONTOLOGISTS WILL SHUT THE DAMN FUCK UP and LISTEN when your superiors are talking... Here is the largest CONFIRMED specimen of Tyrannosaurus specimen FMNH PR2081 a.k.a. Sue ('Celeste' is reported 10% according to J. Horner larger but no measurements to confirm this have been provided.)
rlinfinity 2 years ago
[MSG #2]
Tyrannosaurus rex Osborn 1905
(FMNH PR2081, =BHI 2033; Sue) (11.2 m; 6.7 tons) skull (1.53 m), cervical
vertebrae, dorsal vertebrae, sacrum, proximal caudal vertebrae, scapula,
coracoid, humerus (37.3 mm), radius (17.3 mm), ulna (21.9 mm), metacarpal I
(6.4 mm), manual ungual I, metacarpal II (10.9 mm), phalanx II-1 (5.5 mm),
phalanx II-2 (7.9 mm), manual ungual II, pelvis, femur (1.38 m), tibia (1.2
m), fibula, pes
rlinfinity 2 years ago
[MSG #3]
Okay 6.7 tonnes largest Tyrannosaur specimen. Now for the FUCKING spinosaur to shut you idiot kids up!
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Stromer 1915
(IPHG 1912 VIII 19, destroyed) (~17.4 m, 12-19 tons) maxillary fragment,
incomplete dentary, nineteen teeth, two incomplete cervical vertebrae, seven
dorsal vertebrae (190-210 mm), dorsal ribs, gastralia, eight caudal centra
rlinfinity 2 years ago
hey but what t-rex is this one ? the baby that grow up? or what...the causin,the sister,grandma?.
changuosaurio15 2 years ago
is this jurassic park?
luigiandmario2 2 years ago
yes
jiggyrules 2 years ago
jp3
rlinfinity 2 years ago
are you guys seriously debating if t-rex and spino would figh wno would actually win. wow nerds get a freakien life
shevymevy 2 years ago
and yet you obviously read some of them and responded. Irony!
jrjastud 2 years ago
plus they were on seperate continents back then
TheGermanItalianGuy2 2 years ago
wh y d id you n ot finis h i t
spinoboy119 2 years ago
Guys listen in real life IF spinosaurs and T-Rex meet which would never happen T-Rex would kill the spinosaurs with a neck snapping bite.Remember guys this is a movie maybe they wanted another dinosaur besides T-Rex. at lest T-Rex was in it Still i wish T-Rex killed spino
1legomaster 2 years ago
Spinosaurus was much larger than Tyrannosaurus Rex, so my guess is Spinosaurus would win. There are too many fanbois with an emotional attachment to Tyrannosaurs.
rlinfinity 2 years ago
why do u hate t-rex?
Jurassicparkrules95 2 years ago
i dont "hate" tyrannosaurs, but this fanboism is fucking ridiculous. i bet most of those arguing over how "T-rex" should have won are fucking 8-15 yr olds
rlinfinity 2 years ago
this t-rex was a bit small
Jurassicparkrules95 2 years ago
not really. just that spinosaurs are much larger than tyrannosaurs
rlinfinity 2 years ago
this t-rex is a sub adult!
Jurassicparkrules95 2 years ago
this t-rex is a homo
rlinfinity 2 years ago
why would you say that, t-rex is just an average animal trying to make a living
Jurassicparkrules95 2 years ago
REPTILES if FOR BABIES ONLY
SCOURGExTHExHEDGHoG 2 years ago
o my lord, please we discuss important things here so leave. trolling nintendo seems to fit you more
Jurassicparkrules95 2 years ago
u have no idea how wrong u are, geez, i wish people knew the facts before commenting, let me fill u in, spino was longer and taller, but rex outwieghed spino by 4 tons! rex was smarter, had huge bite force, bone crushing teeth, and a thick neck, were as spino had long narrow thin neck, with tiny needle teeth meant for eating fish.
AmericanMan44 2 years ago
NO IT DIDNT! moron! ... STUPID RETARD MORON CUNT TRYING TO TEACH ME SHIT.. STFU IDIOT. Even modelling the spinosaur's dorsal vertebrae as a spine it is about 4-6 tonnes BIGGER Than a damn Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Modelling the dorsal spines as a fleshy hump the spinosaurus is about 10 tonnes heavier! (about TWICE the weight!)
rlinfinity 2 years ago
can't believe this FUCKTARD WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT AmericanMan44 dared to say TO ME "u have no idea how wrong u are, geez, i wish people knew the facts before commenting," I just disproved your shit right here on YOUTUBE! OWN3D!!! now we see who mouthed off without knowing the facts, and to make matters worse YOU BITCHED ABOUT PPL COMMENTING WITHOUT KNOWING THE FACTS.. and I jsut proved ur the fuckhead commenting without knowing SHIT, blind fucktard.
rlinfinity 2 years ago
...c mon...SPINO cant beat t rex....its a fisher..while t rex is a skilled hunter....t rex has been in more battles than spino...spino may be huge...that makes him more clumsy....40 000 pounds of bite force for t rex....spinos jaw wasnt built for killing other animals..it will snap of anyway
seankyle92 2 years ago 9
@seankyle92 Dude we know "T-rex would win has bigger bite force spino was made to eat fish" comment we don't need to see another one
Wolfnx 1 year ago
@Wolfnx what the fuck is your prob? i wrote that a year ago are you blind
seankyle92 1 year ago
@seankyle92 woah dont have a heart attack now
Wolfnx 1 year ago
@Wolfnx spino didnt win because of bite force,he won because he had longer arms and used them to hold t-rex down while he CRACKED HIS NECK.And im preety sure u would die if u cracked your neck.So spino could have won but they could never meet.why is every body a spino hater.
megaraptor456 1 year ago
@megaraptor456 Ya i just try to get ppl off my ass but i love spino
Wolfnx 1 year ago
@megaraptor456 I don't hate spino but I do not like idiots. One thing is, a Spino's wrist configuration would not allow it make alot of movement if you actually look at the bones and how they work. So "cracking" the Rex's neck is impossible. AS well, the fact the T-Rex's neck is made of pure muscle makes it nearly impossible for Spino to break its neck.
MrTobyCure 1 year ago
@seankyle92 well, Tyrannosaurs was probably scavenger so your opinion is bullshit. Maybe read something about Spino and T-Rex - then write things like this. The fact that Spino ate fish doesn't mean that he wasn't able to fight. End remember tha JP dinosaurus are mutated.
Resvain 1 year ago
@Resvain you wouldnt know either u aint God. many things are just theory and give it a rest its been a year. you fuckin nerd.. even ur comments are full of 'probably' how does it make mine bullshit. and i was speculating since they dont live in the same era. go brag bout ur dino knowledge to ur girl if u have one. btw, i have cuz i aint a fuckin child like u kid.
seankyle92 1 year ago
@seankyle92 t rex is a scavenger you dumb ass
darth09er 1 year ago
@darth09er Since a T-Rex has an incredible brain, strong jaws, fast legs, great eyesight, and strong sense of smell, it HAS to be a scavenger. Your the fucking dumbass.
MrTobyCure 1 year ago
@MrTobyCure hm incredible brain,strong jaws,fast legs.great eyesightand a strong sense of smell? sounds like a hunter to me.Get your facts right then come back here
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 The legs are fast for its size since it can carry such a heavy weight at a speed of 15mph which is faster than most of of its prey items. But becuz of predators having a chance of 9 out of 10 failing the attempt to make a successful kill makes it possible it scavenged, but it doesn't make it a complete scavenger becuz of this. I'd like to hear what you say about this.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@MrTobyCure Well heres what i think on this.If the t-rex failed at a hunt,i dont think it would take it long to find another meal.But if it could not find a meal i also think it would resort to trying to scavage.I think the t-rex was a excellent hunter made for taking down prey but i think it would eat anything with meat on it if it was famished enough.
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 I would highly recommend this to everyone. I do believe if the T-Rex failed at a hunt it would try again, but if it was too hard then I bet it would scavenge to survive. It has all the perfect capabilities as a hunter, but those abilities are perfect for a scavenger as well. You really have to look at it. Lions take hyena kills only becuz they failed on hunting down their own so they scavenge off of hyena kills and vice-versa.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@MrTobyCure well a scavenger does not really need any abilities besides smell to locate the dead dino.
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 . Scavengers like buzzards must use eyesight to be able to identify a dead carcass, smell isn't the only sense for a scavenger. Smell is a powerful tool for scavengers, but it all depends on what perspective the animal has, like T-Rex. I bet that eyesight definitely helped it identify threats if there were any to oppose it if it had to scavenge.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 . But T-Rex would use all of its senses to its ability as a hunter, it had to for it to be able to be such a great hunter and the top of its food chain.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@MrTobyCure yes but what im saying is it would not have all those abilities if it was a scavenger.Its just like giving a souter a bazooka
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 Of course. Which is why T-Rex would be a hunter than a scavenger. These abilities just help it to survive in its hostile environment.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@MrTobyCure then why were you saying it was a scavenger?
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 Wow. I just explained to you on how it is both a hunter and scavenger... -_- You stun me.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
@wazzupnick1 Wow. I just explained to you on how it is both a hunter and scavenger... -_- You stun me. Pay attention more often that way you can actually put down something that I never said. I said it was both a scavenger and a hunter.
MrTobyCure 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTobyCure Since a T-Rex has an incredible brain, strong jaws, fast legs, great eyesight, and strong sense of smell, it HAS to be a scavenger. Your the fucking dumbass.
sound familiar?
wazzupnick1 8 months ago
@darth09er
All predators are Scavenger's, there are so many facts proving T-Rex was not a pure scavenger. This debate needs to end...
There is no logical way in hell such a large an powerful animal could survive being a pure scavenger, T-Rex was the African Male Lion of today...
Lions steal from Hyena's, Cheetahs, many other predators but they are very successful hunters, Id dare you to go up to a Wild Lion an call him a Scavenger.
T-Rex has been PROVEN to be an active hunter
XxComablackxX1937 11 months ago
Comment removed
MegaChallanger 11 months ago
Comment removed
MegaChallanger 11 months ago
@darth09er there's evidence that t-rex attacked triceratops
MegaChallanger 11 months ago
Comment removed
Resvain 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seankyle92 hahhahahhahhaa, funny. Maybe first think, then write. Nerd.... why? Dino knowledge.... WHAT A SHAME! And you definitely act like a fuckin child who pretend adult. But yeah, good for you
Resvain 5 months ago
@seankyle92 how about you tell that to jack horner
mitch9877 1 year ago
@mitch9877 since you like sucking jack honer's dick and admire his biased views, would u think it be logical if t rex was to survive on just carcass alone? wow a lame excuse to have strong jaws, fast legs and brain similar to a crocodile(which is a scavenger and also predator). wait u cnt answer it cuz u love him too much.
seankyle92 1 year ago
@seankyle92 i never said i like jack horner i hate jack horner because he hates trex and for all i know your a troll i left a comment telling you to tell that to jack horner because you act like the person who made this video is responsible for jurrasic park 3 so whatever i dont care what you think about me by the way you fail at life
mitch9877 1 year ago
@seankyle92 by the way i never mentioned spino in my comment dumbass and next time read my comment dont just make an excuse to say bullshit about spino and trex so how about you go troll on someone else for a change
mitch9877 1 year ago
@mitch9877
Jack Horner is a 1 sided idiot, who acts like a Child because T-Rex hunted an killed his favorite Dinosaur..... That guy is a fucking joke to paleontology esp his opinion on T-Rex which has been been proven FALSE. T-Rex was no more Scavenger then Giga, Spino, or Allosaurus an thats a fact.
Seriously Dinosaur George knows more then that Idiot Horner an actually gives solid facts behind his thought's unlike Horny.
That guy needs to retire, he really fucked up JP3 with his opinion
XxComablackxX1937 11 months ago
Comment removed
MegaChallanger 11 months ago
@seankyle92 The Thing with more Advantages Most Of The Time Will Win, But it also depends on how they use it. The Spinyosaurus has Longer Arms, Bigger Body, Just as Strong, Bigger Mouth, Faster, and Amphibious Traits. The Spinyosaurus is Superior on Land and Somewhat Superior in Water [That huge Long Fish Dino would Eat it.].And Also the Spinyosaurus is a killer & isn't as clumsy as The T-Rex [because it can walk on 4 legs].
zenraloc 10 months ago
@seankyle92 Spinossaurus was the most powerful killer in the story of the Earth Planet. Dont believe everything you see in Cinema.
alexcetera 10 months ago
@alexcetera
Spinosaurus was the LARGEST predator to ever walk the earth, mostly due to it's sail which was attached directly to it's Spine.
It was built lighter then T-Rex an it's jaws were built for holding onto fish, an its a proven FACT Spino could not move his arms like that to break the T-Rex's neck, much-less survive a direct bite to the neck from a T-Rex.
Spino might be large, but it's still a bitch boy next to the king ''T-Rex'' an probably isn't even a match for Giganotosaurus.
XxComablackxX1937 10 months ago
@seankyle92 Look at the facts. T-Rexs where scavengers.
xxMoonwish 9 months ago
@xxMoonwish they have found tooth marks on dino bones who were starting to heal
so you and spinofishosaurus and eat shit
fuckturks2223 9 months ago
@xxMoonwish dude how do u know were u a t-rex in the previous life
TheGLOCK40cal 8 months ago
Well, for you guys information they couldn't kill eachother even if they wanted to spino lived in africa 100 million years ago t-rex in north america 75 million years ago! Stop with the bullshit crap about who would win the spino was the main dino in the movie anyways.
salamencemot 2 years ago
Swanton987 is actually right. T-rex is built for taking down MUCH larger and more dangerous prey than Spinosaurus probably even saw in it's life . . . all scientists have ever found in it's fossilized stomach are fish and young dinosaurs.
T-rex would have murded this thing in a real fight, and that makes this scene complete bullshit. Definitely ruined the movie for me, haha.
taxibandit13 2 years ago
to make since to alotta ppl there is no possible way spino could have won....he was not made for taking down a t rex...he was more of a aquatic hunter....when t rex bit him spino would have later on died of infection since the mouth of the trex is like the mouth of he present day komodo dragon...so either way taht spino would have been pushing up daisys
swanton987 3 years ago 5
To make since to you fucking swanton987, IT WAS THE FUCKING MOVIE THAT DECIDED THAT THE SPINO WON. Obviusly jurassic park wanted a dinosaur to be a star instead of the t-rex like in the last 2 movies. You retard.
bluesclueskiller 3 years ago
ok dipshit someone asked how would the spino win i answered him u dumb fuck....god damn u are stupd
swanton987 3 years ago
ok dumbfuck im stupid because i didnt know you masterbate at night to mom on son porn?
oh ok. my bad bro
bluesclueskiller 3 years ago
wait another your mama joke.....hmm how do u like this....while you were making up yourmama jokes i was carving my name inside your moms uterus while she was giving a poodle oral sex...
swanton987 3 years ago
Lol retard that wasnt a yo mamma JOKE
yo mamma jokes ALWAYS for some reason start out like
"Yo mamma so" fat, stupid, ugly, black, lol.
lol u carved ur name inside my mother?
ouch that must have hurt.
bluesclueskiller 3 years ago
T-REX THE KING EVER
aDri7011 3 years ago 3
perfect!
ceejayavilez 3 years ago
t-rex the king
argentinawinx 3 years ago 10
@argentinawinx
Not anymore. LOL
Spinosaurus : Hail to the king, baby.
KennethMoreland 10 months ago
@KennethMoreland
Yea because basing facts on this piece of garbage is right.... already been proven by paleontology since this movie Spino can not beat a T-Rex... an T-Rex still holds the title as King of the Dinosaur's, not this fish-eater
XxComablackxX1937 10 months ago
awesome dude!
spinoboy119 3 years ago
I can not under stand what each of you is saying
Litch1234528 3 years ago
Cena lamentável...
Rexzadon 4 years ago 2
Valeu pelo comentário
thcalmeida26 4 years ago
Não sei porque lamentável... como ter certeza que um T.rex era capaz de abater um Spinosaurus ou não? A teoria de Jack Horner (paleontólogo auxiliador de Jurassic Park) prova cada vez mais que o T.rex era necrófago. Eu sei que o crânio do Spinosaurus era adaptado para pesca e blá blá blá... mas de acordo com as novas descobertas ele podia medir de 16 - 18 metros de comprimento e o T.rex media aproximadamente 12m de comprimento e uns 5m de altura.
MatheusTheOne 3 years ago