I hope their would be an new race not to the moon but to mars the ESA would be an candidate. with the americans with some problems (space shuttle, budget) Russia who is less powerfull then 50 years ago and China. It would be good for the development of new technologies
This is not European Union who pays that, this is not European Union who built ESA, this is Nations and scientific cooperation. UE will crash down, we will leave it and continue to push science. WE ARE OUT OF MONEY CAUSE OF EUROPEAN UNION. But I hope this fall will reborn Europe of power: we must coop with Russia and may be India to go to mars.
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings...
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerated until at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos but at none grow up not at infinte or near of onfinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from coamos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from coamos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
It renounce thus at the absolute space and at the absolute time. From the simple and linear transformations of the Galilei's relativity it arrive at the Lorentz- Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors, subunitary and superunitary. Thus, with these confusions about space and time it passed at the adequate changes about the whole physics.
Actually Einstein, from theoretical confusion and of megalomania, establish that none object with mass can not outrun the light speed.He succeeding, how written publications of the time, let vex much people, then, whenever over a hundred of people of science had signed a petition in which they upholded that the relativity theory is mistaken, is fallacious.Einstein upholded his relativity theory, believing in the fact that then, nobody can not to demonstrate him the contrary.
But in 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
The physicists Hendrik A.Lorentz admits existence of the ether, but emit the hypothesis that any body which it move in report with the ether, with a speed V, suffers a contarction, in the sense that the parallel dimension with the motion's direction it decrease, creating a subunitary factor and arranging formulas in this sense,H.A.Lorentz showed that once with the process of contraction it admits and a dilatation of the time, he alters in this sense the relation to Galilei.
The Michelson-Morley experiments(1881) with the purpose to put in evidence the Earth movement face of one immobile ether, for too be taken as a reference system, had forever the same result. Thus the experiments had showed: 1).-that the ether is complete training with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere; 2).- and that our conception about ether as reference system is not right.
Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings..
The magnetic field produced by superconductor coil, is transformed in electromagnetic field which can evolve in space and will produce the reaction force. The superconductive coil will be supplyed with permanet current at 35...40 kV. This motor is an antigravitational motor, but this will constitute the principal device- indispensable -in the realization the magnetic trap for the thermonuclear controlled reactor!
The reactive electromagnetic motor isn't one invention, it is 100% impression of one part from the schema in the tomb stone from Palenque; which is not sculptured or carved, but is pressed in one die, and mean that it was not performed of the primitive man! The motor has: superconductor coil for magnetic field producing; magnetic nozzles, magnetic circuits for variation of magnetic permeability; dielectric rings for changing electric permitivity.
Mikhael angel showed him thermonuclear controlled reactor namely:"And my spirit hasbeen hiden and me Enoh saw the light of those core.Something as an ice stones house arisen and among ice pieces hadbeen alive fire flames.And my spirit beheld a circle which surround with fire that house from its fourth corner to these alive fire rivers which had enclosed the house.And around it they hadbeen seraphs,cherubs and ophamins these are eternally awake and watch over the glory(ship)"
Heavenly vehicles with thermonuclear controlled reactor were made and exist of thousands years ago.Nikola Tesla was not mad and the Holy Scriptures deceive not. In the Hebrew apocryphal "Jubilees book" it says about patriarch Enoh that he was with God's angels 7 jubilees(49 years) and they, from a great heavenly ship's board showed him all what exist on Earth and in Skys, this now over 4300 years.
The presenter of theoretical physics and scientific-fantastical scenarious know not that in the Holy Scriptures is speak about the heavenly world and about heavenly ships. The Jews od 2000...3500 years ago named them: pear of fire, the cloud, glory of the God, angel, fire cart, fire whirl, a.s.o. In Iezechil's book it describes the appearance, the landing and the starting of a big cosmical vehicles. Iezechil describes the landing train as a four alive creatures group.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
In present we try different vehicles in every medium(submarine, ships, motor cars, trains, airplanes and rockets), and they don't express an optimum garantee neiter for present nor for future. I follow of 50 years the realization of the russians and americans the penetration of the man in cosmos, but the realised progress is not good and sure, but very expensive, very heavy and dangerous.
have aqnyone been to the ESA portal??? HAHA :( its a totall fu6785g mess. try getting anything to work,and when you do its all in fu6756g french...the majority language in europe & the world is english,,,so if esa wants to use french let the f67586g frogs pay for it.
Also there is no way to write to esa from their links to complain about something cos there is no complaints department.
For f76k sake europe...pull the plug on this f876554g french financial black hole!
@blablubb12345 Kinda funny that Hughes satellite is still in business lol, What a dinosaur. I have read that there were quite a few Scientists and engineers drafted from American companies like Boeing and General dynamics during the development of the Arian? please elaborate if you know?
No, there was no involvement from Boeing or GD in the development of Ariane. Btw. Boeing wasn't even in the space business until they bought North American/Rockwell in 1996.
Maybe, but Europe built many of the pressurized ISS modules of the "american section" (Node 2, Node 3, Columbus, Cupola and all 3 MPLMs) and operates the largest supply ship beside the Shuttle.
its because of countless scientists, most of them coming from Europe, that they could achieve the development of the nuclear bomb. french discovered that radioactive elements could releas immense amounts of energy, technology which was then developed more further by the germans.. when the US took over most the job was done, only needed the money to build it..
??.. the french developed their own nuclear capabilities and are now a leader in this domain. opposite of the british who totally rely on the US, either for nuclear techs or ballistic missiles development. Ariane was developed 100% by the french as well as the spaceport in French Guyana. only since ESA was created that the french decided to share their capabilities with the EU. and yes the program was associated with the development of ballistic missile.
@schuf1 umm no that's what NASA really wants. Right now, they don't have funding for 5 years. But during that 5 years, NASA is to plan and build the new and improved space shuttle that will be more energy efficient and will be able travel faster in space. However, NASA's biggest subject is colonizing the cosmos. Starting with either the moon or Mars starting in 5 years. NASA wants a moon base so they can launch shuttles and/or satellites much easier and cheaper. You'd be surprised at these plans
@RobertsDigital A private American organization. I guarantee it. And FYI NASA's budget is more than it has ever been. Their problem is lack of vision. I personally don't care much what NASA does anymore. The future is "new space" as it's being called now.
@schuf1 No, you're wrong. It's neither NASA nor ESA. It's the private space industry. I adore any successful rocket launch and wish all nations good luck, but when you look at what Spacex is doing you can't help but think every other piece of hardware will be rendered obsolete within 5 years. Elon Musk actually said just that (more or less). And he's not one to get cocky at press conferences.
man get ur fact right, saying that i am ignorant when in fact u are because CNES isentre National d'Études Spatiales wich is in english sapce agency man seriously why am i even talking to u. u like a fucking kid who can't even get a fact right and think is clever to go on youtube and insult ppl....
Two Ariane 5 launches could put man back on the moon again, The Lunar Excursion and Lunar transit module(s) would be a stage 4 utilizing their fuel tanks to achieve orbit then refill from the first Ariane 5 launch. This would serve as the 'tanker' to replenish the empty LEM/LTM tanks which would get them to the moon and back. At least it works on paper, though the calculations make for a squeezed sardines can type mission.
yeah that's why the majority of European mars explores have crashed, while America had robots discover water and roam around for months. Your talking to the people who put men on the moon.
Well Americans make good things, it's just that they're so unreliable, always failing, like Apollo 13 and the autopilot failure on Apollo 11 almost cost them the mission, two space shuttles tragically lost. American stuff is good, but it just isn't tough and well built enough. The Russian federal space agency would be far better than NASA except the have almost 10 times less funding.
You really have no clue what your talking about, the USSR had a very large space budget all through the space race. America was sending the first men to the moon, at the same time the soviets crashed a satellite into it.
On the contrary the first rockets were build in America by Robert H. Goddard. He invented the liquid fuel rocket, which von braun later copied in his V2.
@AmirRibery Maybe Germany should thank the original pioneers Tsiolkovsky , and Goddard for making the V2 possible, and also for the Jews who were enslaved to build it !!
but development of ariane 5 is is more than 80 % french by CNES agency affiliated to the French Ministry of Defence
because it is in France where his uniting all "rocket" competences and know-how, the France develops ballistic missiles for its nuclear strategical defence since 1960
rocket ariane was developed since the beginning by the same who developed the French ballistic missiles in silo and SSBN
This idiot guy forgot to say that Ariane is a French rocket, not "european"
It's developed by the French CNES, made in France (mainly) near Paris commercialised by Arianespace (French company), lauched from France, and controlled from France (Toulouse).
ESA just paies to use this laucher, nothing to do with technology or something.
Again, nothing to do with ESA, ESA is just a customer for Arianespace, but has nothing to do with R&D. Ariane is a commercial rocket wich doesn't need ESA to be the world N°1.
Ariane is a French rocket, you have to admit it.
ESA is a different story, but France paies 28% of the budget BTW.
you live in holland... we all know how much the dutchies would love to be the 51st state... you don't even have your own culture anymore, everything is copied from the usa xD
oh, and your language sound horrible, no wonder you want to speak dunglish ^^
@NJRocks281 Yes it does. Almost all EU countries are in esa. Some treaties important in EU creation process established esa. Furthermore american ares V will be like a large copy of ariane5. If constelation program will be late then NASA space program a little bit screwed. Even more: next year esa would get acess to soyuz rockets for manned missions.
The ESA is not under EU jurisdiction. If it was all member of the EU would be contributors in some way to the ESA budget. Two totally separate organizations.
You want to get off this rock, better start pooling talent and recources instead of competing each other to death. Space exploration should be above petty nationalism. ISS is a good start.
Just now? ESA was founded in 1975. Ever heard of Giotto, Spacelab, Ulysses, SOHO or Huygens for example? Those are all european space exploration mission in the last three decades.
Yes stay in your bubble of ignorance, Europe has is space program since 40 Years and for the moment the best lancer in the world is Ariane, and who makes the much money? Europe again, we fucked russia.
british people was never inside in space race ... why? because you would have been able to acquire competences by developing your ballistic missiles for your nuclear weapon ...
but facts are cruel, as always instead of flying off to you in one independence or an alliance with your European neighbours, you got stuck into a dependency of USAS as 51th state !
look polaris and trident missile ... all US technology ! for your dissuasion
look at france ! has the epoch USAS has informed "de gaulle" : never you will reach has develop alone: nuclear submarine launcher, ballistic missiles, atomic weapon ! you need help ---> we can give it to you : but you will be and remain semi depending technologically as part of NATO !
de gaulle it will refuse ! USA then said to him : you will lose your useless bet ...
the France achieved its bet with triumph and absoluement alone: 1967: first French SSBN, second 1968 SSBN, development all at once of the first ballistic missile for under French sailor and for silos in Provence and before france successful alone her atomic weapon has implosion with Pu 239 in 1960
ALL ALONE FRANCE DO THAT ! 1968 first thermonuclear french test (just a small polemic for this last point, or of English would have delivered secret to reach has fission-fusion bomb)
But in reality, issued secret helps in no way: our physicists knew answer to achieve explosive fusion: in fact it was necessary to reinvent the process ... of gaulle has knocked of the fist of the table: in effect Chinese 1 year earlier reached has achieve their first thermonuclear try, what gets angry it, and what will precipitate towards the polemic of exchange of information on technique with british, in reality france successful alone her fusion bomb
Well if you know your history they where!~, We Aussie's were the testing ground for their nuclear explosions and blue streak orbital rocket launches, not that I'm an advocate of this though. One would have to be arrogant to think that the cold war was a "USA" vs "USSR" endeavor, wake up to yourself, lol..!!!
no thank you (and i will i stay in the atmosphere anyway)
in this theoretical case the propulsion will not happen, the engine would spit and not move on, or maybe rather be incandescent, so it might blob-melt, well i don't know i am not a rocket scientist (ha ha)
to move on(advance) a body needs to lean on matter
you can't fly a plane with rocket engines more than 16 kilometers
Wrong... A body doesn't need to lean on anything.
One of Newton's laws of motion states that (rudely stolen directly from Wikipedia) "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."
In this case: rockets propel mass in the opposite direction of that it wants to travel, thus pushing the rocket forward. Simple equation: Mr*Ar=Me*Ae, where Mr: mass of rocket, Ar: accel of rocket, Me: mass of exhaust, Ae: accel of exhaust. If you know Mr, Me, and Ae, you find the accel of the rocket.
Guess what, combustion really is impossible in a vacuum. However, the combustion in a rocket engine takes place in the combustion chamber with pressures in the range of 10-200 bar, in no means a vacuum.
Your understanding that a body needs matter to "lean on" to be accelerated is a bit ... flawed.
Did you ever ask yourself how all these satelites went to space? Or are GPS, Satelite TV and so on just a hoax?
This is somewhat unrelated, but Nigeria has plans to start its own space agency in tandem with a possible general African space agency being proposed by some within the African Union. Nigeria has already built two satellites which have been launched into orbit and is getting funding in order to start a space agency. The ESA said it would be willing to cooperate and contribute to an African space agency, which could also serve to launch some European satellites.
swunt10 - Dream on? Nigeria already has 2 satellites in orbit and is currently organizing funding to build a launch center. Algeria and Ghana have plans to launch their own satellites in the future and the AU is setting aside money for an ESA-like orgnanization. It's no joke at all.
mmh ok maybe Africa would like to have a space agency like the esa but this is very expensive. and Africa is still the poorest continent. what happens if the people in Africa have lees to eat just because there government spent to much money into the ausa (african union space agency^^!?!)
swunt10 - It is true that Africa is still currently the poorest continent in the world but that is just an average. It's like saying "On average white people have pale skin". That doesn't mean there are no tan-skinned white people. The African countries becoming space-faring are the wealthier ones with vibrant, growing economies and more stable infrastructure.
Conversely, the argument could be made that the US shouldn't be having space flights either while $9 trillion in debt.
Plz Ariane is a french project, 80% of the technology is from France, Project was french and Ariane 1, 2, 3, 4 and 80% and actual Ariane is from french engineering.
Don t need source, it s a fact, Ariane was french in the begining, why do you think ariane is lauched from Kourou in French gyana and why do you think leaders are french, why do you think most part of scientist are french too? Plz just admit it, that s a fact!
What is your problem houlala? Nobody denies that France is the biggest contibutor to the Ariane program (60% on Ariane 1 and 45% on Ariane 5), but not 80%. Same with the scientists and technicians beeing mostly french, thats just wrong. Ariane was an international project from the beginning, as was ELDO with the Europa rocket. Of course, it's good for Europe that France owns one of the best places in the world to launch a rocket :-)
Ok just writte ariane in wikipedia...in english or german.
i just take this sentence for you..."The European Space Agency (ESA) charge the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) to the development of all Ariane launchers and of the testing facilities; while Arianespace, a CNES commercial subsidiary created in 1980, handles production, operations and marketing."
the english wiki not really correct, sry. The CNES do not build or develop or have something to do with the ariane 1-4. they were develop by EADS. the ariane 5 was a esa project which should leaded by CNES and build in every esa member state but after the first crash the esa decide to let build the ariane 5 by one company ->arianespace. and yes -> arianespace is 32% french owned.
yes but they would not have gone so far without the help from other nations. even samll ones like belgium, ntherlands denmark and so on. ressearch and development, also takes place in all of the countries.
Sry you re wrong, without others countries France would just pay 100% and not 60. It would be the same. But with Europe we need to do everything together.
Arianespace build the launchers and it's a french company. It is written CNES (French government space agency ) and Arianespace on the rocket. SO, french is the current language used in ESA and the office is in Paris. The rockets are launched from french guiana. So, France sent rockets into space before. The contribution of France for Ariane 1 was 80%, only 20 for Germany. France is the first contributor: 70 billions a year, twice more than Germany and the italian contribution is pathetic.
The rocket is built by EADS and then sold to Arianespace. The upper stages, parts of the engines, booster casings and the dual launch structures are built in Germany. CNES only holds about 30% of Arianespace and contributes 30% of the 3 billion budget of ESA, followed by Germany(23%).
I hope their would be an new race not to the moon but to mars the ESA would be an candidate. with the americans with some problems (space shuttle, budget) Russia who is less powerfull then 50 years ago and China. It would be good for the development of new technologies
turner2123 1 month ago
support cnes
1977ritchiemohammed 2 months ago
Support project icarus!
AgrivatedKillah 4 months ago
Vive Arianespace et le CNES !
etbadaboum 4 months ago
This is not European Union who pays that, this is not European Union who built ESA, this is Nations and scientific cooperation. UE will crash down, we will leave it and continue to push science. WE ARE OUT OF MONEY CAUSE OF EUROPEAN UNION. But I hope this fall will reborn Europe of power: we must coop with Russia and may be India to go to mars.
VincetheFrogophil 5 months ago
I like turtles. Greetings from the European Union.
lumberj23 8 months ago 2
Long live the European Union. Greetings from the United Kingdom.
Shackerrrz 9 months ago 8
Long live me too ..
duxberry1958 10 months ago
Long live the United States of America!
Greetings from Florida and NASA!
LithuanianLabas 10 months ago
Long Live the European Union!!!! And long Live ESA!!!
Greetings from Portugal!!!!
zoompt 11 months ago 3
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings...
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
Long live European Union ! From France :))!
saturnin549 1 year ago
It 2011 but our only way to get into space are huge firecrackers. Humans are stupid.
Yous111111 1 year ago
Do all you idiots shouting long live the European Union realize that the ESA has nothing to do with the EU?
njdevil281 1 year ago
@njdevil281 ESA is about Europe's independence in space
EU is about Europe's independence on Earth
Connect the dots... ;)
zoompt 11 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerated until at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos but at none grow up not at infinte or near of onfinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from coamos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from coamos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
It renounce thus at the absolute space and at the absolute time. From the simple and linear transformations of the Galilei's relativity it arrive at the Lorentz- Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors, subunitary and superunitary. Thus, with these confusions about space and time it passed at the adequate changes about the whole physics.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
Actually Einstein, from theoretical confusion and of megalomania, establish that none object with mass can not outrun the light speed.He succeeding, how written publications of the time, let vex much people, then, whenever over a hundred of people of science had signed a petition in which they upholded that the relativity theory is mistaken, is fallacious.Einstein upholded his relativity theory, believing in the fact that then, nobody can not to demonstrate him the contrary.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
But in 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists Hendrik A.Lorentz admits existence of the ether, but emit the hypothesis that any body which it move in report with the ether, with a speed V, suffers a contarction, in the sense that the parallel dimension with the motion's direction it decrease, creating a subunitary factor and arranging formulas in this sense,H.A.Lorentz showed that once with the process of contraction it admits and a dilatation of the time, he alters in this sense the relation to Galilei.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
The Michelson-Morley experiments(1881) with the purpose to put in evidence the Earth movement face of one immobile ether, for too be taken as a reference system, had forever the same result. Thus the experiments had showed: 1).-that the ether is complete training with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere; 2).- and that our conception about ether as reference system is not right.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings..
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
The magnetic field produced by superconductor coil, is transformed in electromagnetic field which can evolve in space and will produce the reaction force. The superconductive coil will be supplyed with permanet current at 35...40 kV. This motor is an antigravitational motor, but this will constitute the principal device- indispensable -in the realization the magnetic trap for the thermonuclear controlled reactor!
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
The reactive electromagnetic motor isn't one invention, it is 100% impression of one part from the schema in the tomb stone from Palenque; which is not sculptured or carved, but is pressed in one die, and mean that it was not performed of the primitive man! The motor has: superconductor coil for magnetic field producing; magnetic nozzles, magnetic circuits for variation of magnetic permeability; dielectric rings for changing electric permitivity.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
Mikhael angel showed him thermonuclear controlled reactor namely:"And my spirit hasbeen hiden and me Enoh saw the light of those core.Something as an ice stones house arisen and among ice pieces hadbeen alive fire flames.And my spirit beheld a circle which surround with fire that house from its fourth corner to these alive fire rivers which had enclosed the house.And around it they hadbeen seraphs,cherubs and ophamins these are eternally awake and watch over the glory(ship)"
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
Heavenly vehicles with thermonuclear controlled reactor were made and exist of thousands years ago.Nikola Tesla was not mad and the Holy Scriptures deceive not. In the Hebrew apocryphal "Jubilees book" it says about patriarch Enoh that he was with God's angels 7 jubilees(49 years) and they, from a great heavenly ship's board showed him all what exist on Earth and in Skys, this now over 4300 years.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
The presenter of theoretical physics and scientific-fantastical scenarious know not that in the Holy Scriptures is speak about the heavenly world and about heavenly ships. The Jews od 2000...3500 years ago named them: pear of fire, the cloud, glory of the God, angel, fire cart, fire whirl, a.s.o. In Iezechil's book it describes the appearance, the landing and the starting of a big cosmical vehicles. Iezechil describes the landing train as a four alive creatures group.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
• SandustanBrasov
In present we try different vehicles in every medium(submarine, ships, motor cars, trains, airplanes and rockets), and they don't express an optimum garantee neiter for present nor for future. I follow of 50 years the realization of the russians and americans the penetration of the man in cosmos, but the realised progress is not good and sure, but very expensive, very heavy and dangerous.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is just not a ordinary dating site this is a Naughty women site mworld5.info
JEANINEELEANOR 1 year ago
PLease all europeans : English/France/Germany/Spain/Italia and others...
BE ONE AGAINST US/CHINA
raikko30 1 year ago
have aqnyone been to the ESA portal??? HAHA :( its a totall fu6785g mess. try getting anything to work,and when you do its all in fu6756g french...the majority language in europe & the world is english,,,so if esa wants to use french let the f67586g frogs pay for it.
Also there is no way to write to esa from their links to complain about something cos there is no complaints department.
For f76k sake europe...pull the plug on this f876554g french financial black hole!
The7of1 1 year ago
@The7of1
LOL? maaann! you´re a dickhead like no other! go to your mamy and tell her that shit! hahaha
europe is the best!
DeutschlandLiebeIch 1 year ago
I love the Boeing logo on one of the research stickers 1:17 right when the narrator was explaining how it was an "all European effort". WOW
brentsrx7 1 year ago
@brentsrx7
That's a payload sticker. One of the satellites, Astra 2D, was built by Boeing/Hughes.
Ariane itself IS an "all European effort"
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 Kinda funny that Hughes satellite is still in business lol, What a dinosaur. I have read that there were quite a few Scientists and engineers drafted from American companies like Boeing and General dynamics during the development of the Arian? please elaborate if you know?
brentsrx7 1 year ago
@brentsrx7
No, there was no involvement from Boeing or GD in the development of Ariane. Btw. Boeing wasn't even in the space business until they bought North American/Rockwell in 1996.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search online Russian women gettop5.info
qazswwers 1 year ago
haw many people has the ESA launched into space? none?
another reason why capitalism beats socialism.
phantom1000A 1 year ago
@phantom1000A
Maybe, but Europe built many of the pressurized ISS modules of the "american section" (Node 2, Node 3, Columbus, Cupola and all 3 MPLMs) and operates the largest supply ship beside the Shuttle.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
French are sick, theyre also the first that replicated nuclear fusion in a lab.
And to expect its gonna lift 12tons into orbit one day is just amazing. Go ariane V
Armigo91 1 year ago
@Armigo91
First controlled nuclear fusion was achieved 1991 with the JET (joint european torus) in Cullham, Great Britain.
Btw. Ariane is not only french and can already lift more than 20 tons to low earth orbit.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@karim1322
the US gave us nuclear power ?? are you kidding ?
its because of countless scientists, most of them coming from Europe, that they could achieve the development of the nuclear bomb. french discovered that radioactive elements could releas immense amounts of energy, technology which was then developed more further by the germans.. when the US took over most the job was done, only needed the money to build it..
s0undActivist 1 year ago
@karim1322
??.. the french developed their own nuclear capabilities and are now a leader in this domain. opposite of the british who totally rely on the US, either for nuclear techs or ballistic missiles development. Ariane was developed 100% by the french as well as the spaceport in French Guyana. only since ESA was created that the french decided to share their capabilities with the EU. and yes the program was associated with the development of ballistic missile.
s0undActivist 1 year ago
u r so much better at making working cheap rockets than the usa/russia
joshbulldog1661 1 year ago
ESA is the future of space exploration. NASA seems to work against space travel...
schuf1 1 year ago 7
@schuf1 umm no that's what NASA really wants. Right now, they don't have funding for 5 years. But during that 5 years, NASA is to plan and build the new and improved space shuttle that will be more energy efficient and will be able travel faster in space. However, NASA's biggest subject is colonizing the cosmos. Starting with either the moon or Mars starting in 5 years. NASA wants a moon base so they can launch shuttles and/or satellites much easier and cheaper. You'd be surprised at these plans
anonymous5536 1 year ago
@schuf1 NASA is out of money......
The European Union has more than enough money for space exploration, Including Russia,Japan and China
The US is heavily in debt.
Now the question is who will be the first to put a man on Mars?
RobertsDigital 7 months ago
@RobertsDigital A private American organization. I guarantee it. And FYI NASA's budget is more than it has ever been. Their problem is lack of vision. I personally don't care much what NASA does anymore. The future is "new space" as it's being called now.
baillou2 4 months ago
@baillou2 What? Nasas budget isn't more than it has ever been.
Just more than it has been in a while.
AgrivatedKillah 4 months ago
@schuf1 No, you're wrong. It's neither NASA nor ESA. It's the private space industry. I adore any successful rocket launch and wish all nations good luck, but when you look at what Spacex is doing you can't help but think every other piece of hardware will be rendered obsolete within 5 years. Elon Musk actually said just that (more or less). And he's not one to get cocky at press conferences.
baillou2 4 months ago
man get ur fact right, saying that i am ignorant when in fact u are because CNES isentre National d'Études Spatiales wich is in english sapce agency man seriously why am i even talking to u. u like a fucking kid who can't even get a fact right and think is clever to go on youtube and insult ppl....
karim13222 1 year ago
@karim1322 hahaha, you are ignorant dude ... ! French CNES is the master for developpement of ariane 5 (and all ariane) for 70% of the ingineering ...
French CNES is a military agency (french defense minister) the same develloper for the french balistic missile !
And now you say : "Ariane as nothing to do with military intelligence"
you are a MORON man ...
alpacks 1 year ago
Two Ariane 5 launches could put man back on the moon again, The Lunar Excursion and Lunar transit module(s) would be a stage 4 utilizing their fuel tanks to achieve orbit then refill from the first Ariane 5 launch. This would serve as the 'tanker' to replenish the empty LEM/LTM tanks which would get them to the moon and back. At least it works on paper, though the calculations make for a squeezed sardines can type mission.
netsight 1 year ago
its like a giant copy of NASA except shittier
NJRocks281 2 years ago
@NJRocks281
European stuff is far superior to American stuff.
slash65 2 years ago
yeah that's why the majority of European mars explores have crashed, while America had robots discover water and roam around for months. Your talking to the people who put men on the moon.
NJRocks281 2 years ago
@NJRocks281
Well Americans make good things, it's just that they're so unreliable, always failing, like Apollo 13 and the autopilot failure on Apollo 11 almost cost them the mission, two space shuttles tragically lost. American stuff is good, but it just isn't tough and well built enough. The Russian federal space agency would be far better than NASA except the have almost 10 times less funding.
slash65 2 years ago
You really have no clue what your talking about, the USSR had a very large space budget all through the space race. America was sending the first men to the moon, at the same time the soviets crashed a satellite into it.
NJRocks281 2 years ago
money, money, money, must be funny :D
aqayax 2 years ago
to all americans! never forget you copied it! we germans have build the first rockets! so do not tell us europeans that we´ve copied it!
AmirRibery 2 years ago 3
On the contrary the first rockets were build in America by Robert H. Goddard. He invented the liquid fuel rocket, which von braun later copied in his V2.
NJRocks281 2 years ago
@AmirRibery Maybe Germany should thank the original pioneers Tsiolkovsky , and Goddard for making the V2 possible, and also for the Jews who were enslaved to build it !!
netsight 2 years ago
Ariane is a French rocket with european cooperation.
mariusrodrigo 2 years ago 3
to put everybody agreed
the France contributes financially is 27 % in ESA
but development of ariane 5 is is more than 80 % french by CNES agency affiliated to the French Ministry of Defence
because it is in France where his uniting all "rocket" competences and know-how, the France develops ballistic missiles for its nuclear strategical defence since 1960
rocket ariane was developed since the beginning by the same who developed the French ballistic missiles in silo and SSBN
alpacks 2 years ago 2
@alpacks man f**k off it as nothing to do with french military just go fuck ur self
karim13222 1 year ago
French Suprematie space Orbiter
yanaliena10 2 years ago
CNES french rocket, and European humain ressources guys, all the rest is money....
DiamZz 2 years ago 4
It is only a tip of an iceberg comparing to what EU could achieve. But I am happy to sea some progress in European space science.
WeAreTheEuropeanz 2 years ago
Good video !!
Europeanunionfr 2 years ago
i love european union
we must create european a movement
so that people know EU
Europeanunionfr 2 years ago 2
WE LAUNCH EVERYTHING!
TON & GAINER
TonGainer 2 years ago
This idiot guy forgot to say that Ariane is a French rocket, not "european"
It's developed by the French CNES, made in France (mainly) near Paris commercialised by Arianespace (French company), lauched from France, and controlled from France (Toulouse).
ESA just paies to use this laucher, nothing to do with technology or something.
So "europe" ahaha let me laugh...
mariusrodrigo 2 years ago
the EU pays for it.
peuterschmidt 2 years ago
France paies more than 65%
Then Germany, Italy and others, nothing to do with the EU.
mariusrodrigo 2 years ago
No ESA No party so quit saying that France is the biggest player. You forget that the rocket isn't the only thing that is important.
Badkuipeend 2 years ago 2
Again, nothing to do with ESA, ESA is just a customer for Arianespace, but has nothing to do with R&D. Ariane is a commercial rocket wich doesn't need ESA to be the world N°1.
Ariane is a French rocket, you have to admit it.
ESA is a different story, but France paies 28% of the budget BTW.
mariusrodrigo 2 years ago
wrong: france pays approx. 27%, germany 22%, italy 14% .
wuestenkamel 2 years ago
What are you talking about? ESA budget or Ariane budget?
mariusrodrigo 2 years ago
esa budget
wuestenkamel 2 years ago
France is in Europe, thus, yes, it's a European program, and not American or Russian
Tarkatus 2 years ago
i would like to see the the europeans a proud of this rocket and the ESA.
its regardless which country builds it or how is paying for it.
werty1st 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fugg the EU...
hedonismrocks 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
USA the best. but i live in EU
D0dgeCharg3r 2 years ago
you live in holland... we all know how much the dutchies would love to be the 51st state... you don't even have your own culture anymore, everything is copied from the usa xD
oh, and your language sound horrible, no wonder you want to speak dunglish ^^
hedonismrocks 2 years ago
Hehehe, i wish it was all like the usa.. xD but it isnt copied as much as you think..
D0dgeCharg3r 2 years ago
what? dutch sound cool!
thebigwhiterock 2 years ago
Nah, maybe this moron, but most dutch feel european/dutch.
ramonnl 2 years ago
EU is the best place
mykeuser 2 years ago 3
Long Live the European Union.
Love from Ireland
TheMrWmjenkinson 2 years ago 36
viva Espana
damr666 2 years ago
Long live the European Union!!! Greetings from Sweden and Belgium :)
polaire1982 2 years ago 4
long live the EUROPEAN UNION !!! Greetings from Romania :)
chickensupdude 2 years ago 5
LONG LIVE THE EUROPEAN UNION !!! Greetings from Germany :)
borland08 2 years ago 4
LONG LIVE THE EUROPEAN UNION !!! Greetings from Poland :)
Noitar01 2 years ago 35
+1 :) !!
how would you say it in polish ?
Maitresinh 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
MaeuEspano 2 years ago
Long live The European Union = Niech żyje Unia Europejska !!
Greetings from Poland too .
MaeuEspano 2 years ago 4
LONG LIVE THE EUROPEAN UNION !!! Greetings from Austria (France at the moment :)
wuestenkamel 2 years ago 4
ESA has nothing to do with the European Union you idiots...
NJRocks281 2 years ago
@NJRocks281 Yes it does. Almost all EU countries are in esa. Some treaties important in EU creation process established esa. Furthermore american ares V will be like a large copy of ariane5. If constelation program will be late then NASA space program a little bit screwed. Even more: next year esa would get acess to soyuz rockets for manned missions.
chronius9 2 years ago
The ESA is not under EU jurisdiction. If it was all member of the EU would be contributors in some way to the ESA budget. Two totally separate organizations.
NJRocks281 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
w w w. stormfront. org
157000 members and growing!
Achilles1389 3 years ago
this rocks!':D
aval1998 3 years ago
Comment removed
aval1998 3 years ago
This "piece of crap" happens to be the second largest GTO launcher in the world and is hauling more comsats per year than any other.
blablubb12345 3 years ago
You want to get off this rock, better start pooling talent and recources instead of competing each other to death. Space exploration should be above petty nationalism. ISS is a good start.
EpoBot 3 years ago
"hahahaha europe is just now exploring space. I'm sorry but the space race was 50 years ago. Europe is 40 years late sorry"
the ignorance of an big big big ass hole ...
-__-
arianespace lauch rocket for satelitte and a lot of spacecraft, last ATV, rosetta ... and much more !
you are just a stupid man and you know nothing of european space agency
alpacks 3 years ago
Comment removed
britishareawesome69 3 years ago
Just now? ESA was founded in 1975. Ever heard of Giotto, Spacelab, Ulysses, SOHO or Huygens for example? Those are all european space exploration mission in the last three decades.
blablubb12345 3 years ago
Yes stay in your bubble of ignorance, Europe has is space program since 40 Years and for the moment the best lancer in the world is Ariane, and who makes the much money? Europe again, we fucked russia.
houlala16 3 years ago
maybe, but the future belongs to europe.
gaspargr 3 years ago
t'es vraiment qu'un trou du cul toi
shaitan34fr 3 years ago
"ahhh i n'aimez pas mon commentaire que j'ai quitté il ya un mois! Je tiens à le supprimer: / Je viens de embêté à l'époque"
britishareawesome69 3 years ago
ahhh i dont like my comment i left a month ago!! i want to remove it :/ I was just pissed off at that time
britishareawesome69 3 years ago
british people was never inside in space race ... why? because you would have been able to acquire competences by developing your ballistic missiles for your nuclear weapon ...
but facts are cruel, as always instead of flying off to you in one independence or an alliance with your European neighbours, you got stuck into a dependency of USAS as 51th state !
look polaris and trident missile ... all US technology ! for your dissuasion
alpacks 2 years ago
look at france ! has the epoch USAS has informed "de gaulle" : never you will reach has develop alone: nuclear submarine launcher, ballistic missiles, atomic weapon ! you need help ---> we can give it to you : but you will be and remain semi depending technologically as part of NATO !
de gaulle it will refuse ! USA then said to him : you will lose your useless bet ...
alpacks 2 years ago
the France achieved its bet with triumph and absoluement alone: 1967: first French SSBN, second 1968 SSBN, development all at once of the first ballistic missile for under French sailor and for silos in Provence and before france successful alone her atomic weapon has implosion with Pu 239 in 1960
ALL ALONE FRANCE DO THAT ! 1968 first thermonuclear french test (just a small polemic for this last point, or of English would have delivered secret to reach has fission-fusion bomb)
alpacks 2 years ago
But in reality, issued secret helps in no way: our physicists knew answer to achieve explosive fusion: in fact it was necessary to reinvent the process ... of gaulle has knocked of the fist of the table: in effect Chinese 1 year earlier reached has achieve their first thermonuclear try, what gets angry it, and what will precipitate towards the polemic of exchange of information on technique with british, in reality france successful alone her fusion bomb
alpacks 2 years ago
Well if you know your history they where!~, We Aussie's were the testing ground for their nuclear explosions and blue streak orbital rocket launches, not that I'm an advocate of this though. One would have to be arrogant to think that the cold war was a "USA" vs "USSR" endeavor, wake up to yourself, lol..!!!
netsight 2 years ago
your not a nuclear power the UK is and the european space agecny is in spain
charlieiscool1000 1 year ago
come on wikipedia is written by 15 years old nerds who copy from propagandist reviews
a body can go adrift or move by itself in this case it needs something to react to its movements, matter
all those selling you anti matter are selling you things that do not exist, religion
robertgrassi 3 years ago
in vacuum one can not swim because there is no matter to lean on
satellites are an hoax
there is no eye in the sky, only airplanes taking photos and not everywhere, where is the ice in the north pole in google earth?
robertgrassi 3 years ago
faked! no combustion in vacuum, no propulsion is possible in space, these are simulation exercises
robertgrassi 3 years ago
you can if you the fuel and oxygen with you.
guppy818 3 years ago
no thank you (and i will i stay in the atmosphere anyway)
in this theoretical case the propulsion will not happen, the engine would spit and not move on, or maybe rather be incandescent, so it might blob-melt, well i don't know i am not a rocket scientist (ha ha)
to move on(advance) a body needs to lean on matter
you can't fly a plane with rocket engines more than 16 kilometers
robertgrassi 3 years ago
Wrong... A body doesn't need to lean on anything.
One of Newton's laws of motion states that (rudely stolen directly from Wikipedia) "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."
In this case: rockets propel mass in the opposite direction of that it wants to travel, thus pushing the rocket forward. Simple equation: Mr*Ar=Me*Ae, where Mr: mass of rocket, Ar: accel of rocket, Me: mass of exhaust, Ae: accel of exhaust. If you know Mr, Me, and Ae, you find the accel of the rocket.
LostOliven 3 years ago
Guess what, combustion really is impossible in a vacuum. However, the combustion in a rocket engine takes place in the combustion chamber with pressures in the range of 10-200 bar, in no means a vacuum.
Your understanding that a body needs matter to "lean on" to be accelerated is a bit ... flawed.
Did you ever ask yourself how all these satelites went to space? Or are GPS, Satelite TV and so on just a hoax?
blablubb12345 3 years ago
it's you the big fake ... asshole you PROOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT with your mouth
alpacks 3 years ago
Ariane series is quite like China's CZ series, with CZ-5 in development.
CelestialKindred 3 years ago
Seems like the rest of the world is always copying China ;-)
blablubb12345 3 years ago
Since when does like means copying?
The resemblance of those two series just shows how engineers around the world exploit technological innovations.
CelestialKindred 3 years ago
If one is like the other it s the chinese one, ariane is a 30Years old project.
houlala16 3 years ago
This is somewhat unrelated, but Nigeria has plans to start its own space agency in tandem with a possible general African space agency being proposed by some within the African Union. Nigeria has already built two satellites which have been launched into orbit and is getting funding in order to start a space agency. The ESA said it would be willing to cooperate and contribute to an African space agency, which could also serve to launch some European satellites.
A86 3 years ago
haha LOL. dream on
swunt10 3 years ago
swunt10 - Dream on? Nigeria already has 2 satellites in orbit and is currently organizing funding to build a launch center. Algeria and Ghana have plans to launch their own satellites in the future and the AU is setting aside money for an ESA-like orgnanization. It's no joke at all.
A86 3 years ago
mmh ok maybe Africa would like to have a space agency like the esa but this is very expensive. and Africa is still the poorest continent. what happens if the people in Africa have lees to eat just because there government spent to much money into the ausa (african union space agency^^!?!)
is this the right way?
swunt10 3 years ago
swunt10 - It is true that Africa is still currently the poorest continent in the world but that is just an average. It's like saying "On average white people have pale skin". That doesn't mean there are no tan-skinned white people. The African countries becoming space-faring are the wealthier ones with vibrant, growing economies and more stable infrastructure.
Conversely, the argument could be made that the US shouldn't be having space flights either while $9 trillion in debt.
A86 3 years ago
French are only the biggest contributors, because they lauch the missiles from their territory.
And, of course, france could do nothing with the missiles if there weren't european space projects.
Ben5021 3 years ago
Plz Ariane is a french project, 80% of the technology is from France, Project was french and Ariane 1, 2, 3, 4 and 80% and actual Ariane is from french engineering.
It s like EADS.
houlala16 3 years ago
80%??? need sources!!! i think you just say such thinks because you are france, LOL but it is ok. if you feel better it is ok^^
swunt10 3 years ago
Don t need source, it s a fact, Ariane was french in the begining, why do you think ariane is lauched from Kourou in French gyana and why do you think leaders are french, why do you think most part of scientist are french too? Plz just admit it, that s a fact!
houlala16 3 years ago
What is your problem houlala? Nobody denies that France is the biggest contibutor to the Ariane program (60% on Ariane 1 and 45% on Ariane 5), but not 80%. Same with the scientists and technicians beeing mostly french, thats just wrong. Ariane was an international project from the beginning, as was ELDO with the Europa rocket. Of course, it's good for Europe that France owns one of the best places in the world to launch a rocket :-)
blablubb12345 3 years ago
When i say 80%, it s not only money but money and everything.
houlala16 3 years ago
director of the ariane programm was the german spaceingeneer Horst Holsten. just for example!
it was a europien projekt and not a "80%" frence projekt. it is the same with the Saturn5 and wernher von Braun.
swunt10 3 years ago
Ok just writte ariane in wikipedia...in english or german.
i just take this sentence for you..."The European Space Agency (ESA) charge the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) to the development of all Ariane launchers and of the testing facilities; while Arianespace, a CNES commercial subsidiary created in 1980, handles production, operations and marketing."
houlala16 3 years ago
CNES=100% french.
houlala16 3 years ago
the english wiki not really correct, sry. The CNES do not build or develop or have something to do with the ariane 1-4. they were develop by EADS. the ariane 5 was a esa project which should leaded by CNES and build in every esa member state but after the first crash the esa decide to let build the ariane 5 by one company ->arianespace. and yes -> arianespace is 32% french owned.
swunt10 3 years ago
I m sorry but french wiki or english wiki say the same thing, and on the CNES website too.
French still own 60%. CNES developed the ariane project (ariane 1 to 4).
houlala16 3 years ago
Why do you keep shouting that.
Who gives a fuck, it's european.
That's why people are calling us a bunch of nations trying to team up but failing.
We must work together!
ramonnl 3 years ago 3
ariane 5 programm is a 60% french realisation not 80 ... i'm french and 80% is fake, CNES are the principal intelligency for this rocket
alpacks 3 years ago
Yes it s European but french are the biggest contributor, just have a look on wikipedia and writte ariane.
houlala16 3 years ago
yes but they would not have gone so far without the help from other nations. even samll ones like belgium, ntherlands denmark and so on. ressearch and development, also takes place in all of the countries.
segmemtum 3 years ago
Sry you re wrong, without others countries France would just pay 100% and not 60. It would be the same. But with Europe we need to do everything together.
houlala16 3 years ago
yeah but that would hurt France's economy or at least reduce how much money the french would have.
segmemtum 3 years ago
Hurt french economy no but reduce how the money is spending yes.
houlala16 3 years ago
yeah and I believe the french people woulden't agree with that.
Lokum64Latrin46WC 3 years ago
after seeing what NASA has planned (Aries, etc..) I think the ESA will soon surpass them.
P.S. I'm American.
heymoe64 3 years ago 2
Ariane is EUROPEAN !!!!!
cartman4916 3 years ago
ESA belongs to France for more than 70%. Ariane is a french rocket
Lanfeust717 3 years ago
Actually it's only about 30%. And Ariane is a european rocket, mainly build by France, Germany and Italy.
blablubb12345 3 years ago 5
Arianespace build the launchers and it's a french company. It is written CNES (French government space agency ) and Arianespace on the rocket. SO, french is the current language used in ESA and the office is in Paris. The rockets are launched from french guiana. So, France sent rockets into space before. The contribution of France for Ariane 1 was 80%, only 20 for Germany. France is the first contributor: 70 billions a year, twice more than Germany and the italian contribution is pathetic.
Lanfeust717 3 years ago
The rocket is built by EADS and then sold to Arianespace. The upper stages, parts of the engines, booster casings and the dual launch structures are built in Germany. CNES only holds about 30% of Arianespace and contributes 30% of the 3 billion budget of ESA, followed by Germany(23%).
blablubb12345 3 years ago