Another one for our antis. If there is a causal relationship between Smoking and cardiovascular disease, why is it that there are less people smoking, (the cause), and MORE cardiovascular disease? Is it some sort of inverse causal relationship? That would mean that if everyone starts smoking, there should be no cardiovascular disease. Nope doesn't work. I know! They're looking at the wrong cause! Spend the damned money finding the REAL cause! Dave.
HC. As you and all halfway intelligent people know. The WHO made big claims for their study. The evidence did nothing to bother me because I read the report. Risk was minimal, safer than drinking water. On further study, even that minimal risk was exaggerated. Their control groups were atypical. I'm even LESS bothered now. ;-D Dave.
Prior to the smoking ban, I, like everyone else was quite happy to believe that my smoking was bad for me. But as soon as they passed a law based on the obvious lie of passive smoke, I was inspired to re-examine the previous claims. The antis have undermined their own bullshit by piling on yet more bullshit.
I revisited this, KNOWING I'd made a mistake. I made the assumption that the antis would know what a word like atypical meant. For their benefit. Atypical means NOT typical, NOT representative, different from most people. Dave.
An easy mistake to make Dave, they are after all the thickest people in the world. Its very hard to judge them by our own high standards, since they cannot even spell the word "standard".
Well done HC. Have you ever seen the experiments on rats that PROVED smoking caused cancer?? As they were breathing through the cigarettes, I'm surprised they didn't die of asphyxiation lol.
Then why else do you spend your time trawling youtube for smokers to have a pop at? Or do you see yourself as a moral crusader, stamping out the evils of tobacco? You said before "if you want to smoke who the hell cares". Well its obvious you care enough about what I do to view more than one of my videos and leave comments. Either you have a phobia against smoking, or you simply have a phobia against me.
I agree Tom, you are clearly so addicted to your phobia against smoking that you are in denial about the obvious lack of evidence. I'm sorry for your problem, but I'm sure with time you will overcome it, and possibly even be able to re-enter society. Keep your chin up mate.
they do no more studies because there is already enough evidence to proof how bad smoking is for you,but if you want to smoke who the hell cares but dont sit here and try to convince someone they cause no harm i have seen what they do first hand.
If you have seen the harm they cause first hand, then I suggest you send this information to the Department of Health, as they have failed to find any evidence whatsoever. Likewise, I'm sure the WHO would be interested since they also have failed to find a provable causation between tobacco and cancer. But of course, your so called first hand experience is simply a case of knowing someone that smoked who also happened to die. Well guess what matey boy, everybody dies.
As I say in the video, why don't they show us the evidence that they claim they already have, rather than waste money looking for more.
And you say it's because dummies like me keep smoking. Why don't they just leave me alone and let me smoke. Afterall, if it really was so dangerous, we smokers would all die off. But thats the big flaw in the antis arguments, we smokers just keep on living full and healthy lives.
You forget Phil. They showed us the evidence. Just it didn't do what it said in the advertising blurb. Seems they thought we were too damned stupid to be able to understand what their 'evidence' really said. So they're not just vindictive bastards, they're ARROGANT VINDICTIVE BASTARDS. Dave.
Seventy years of trying to prove smoking causes cancer and so far zip.
Just like all those fantasists that squander money trying to prove the loch ness monster exists. They can't, because it doesn't. No ammount of money in the world is gonna find what isn't there.
Hi Phil, Yet another great and true video from your goodself. How on earth do these organisations get away with their fabricated LIES!! It's so frustrating! Thanks for sharing your views. Jo
It's all just money making bullshit.
Hobby331 8 months ago
Another one for our antis. If there is a causal relationship between Smoking and cardiovascular disease, why is it that there are less people smoking, (the cause), and MORE cardiovascular disease? Is it some sort of inverse causal relationship? That would mean that if everyone starts smoking, there should be no cardiovascular disease. Nope doesn't work. I know! They're looking at the wrong cause! Spend the damned money finding the REAL cause! Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
HC. As you and all halfway intelligent people know. The WHO made big claims for their study. The evidence did nothing to bother me because I read the report. Risk was minimal, safer than drinking water. On further study, even that minimal risk was exaggerated. Their control groups were atypical. I'm even LESS bothered now. ;-D Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
Mmmmmm. That's not to say you're only halfway intelligent lol. Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
Prior to the smoking ban, I, like everyone else was quite happy to believe that my smoking was bad for me. But as soon as they passed a law based on the obvious lie of passive smoke, I was inspired to re-examine the previous claims. The antis have undermined their own bullshit by piling on yet more bullshit.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
I revisited this, KNOWING I'd made a mistake. I made the assumption that the antis would know what a word like atypical meant. For their benefit. Atypical means NOT typical, NOT representative, different from most people. Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
An easy mistake to make Dave, they are after all the thickest people in the world. Its very hard to judge them by our own high standards, since they cannot even spell the word "standard".
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
Well done HC. Have you ever seen the experiments on rats that PROVED smoking caused cancer?? As they were breathing through the cigarettes, I'm surprised they didn't die of asphyxiation lol.
DrDave953 3 years ago
phobia about smoking?cheez you are a maroon
tom4342 3 years ago
Then why else do you spend your time trawling youtube for smokers to have a pop at? Or do you see yourself as a moral crusader, stamping out the evils of tobacco? You said before "if you want to smoke who the hell cares". Well its obvious you care enough about what I do to view more than one of my videos and leave comments. Either you have a phobia against smoking, or you simply have a phobia against me.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
I've been wondering for a few days now Phil. Any idea what a MAROON is? Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
Ooops a couple of days lol Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
an addicted brain in denial
tom4342 3 years ago
I agree Tom, you are clearly so addicted to your phobia against smoking that you are in denial about the obvious lack of evidence. I'm sorry for your problem, but I'm sure with time you will overcome it, and possibly even be able to re-enter society. Keep your chin up mate.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
they do no more studies because there is already enough evidence to proof how bad smoking is for you,but if you want to smoke who the hell cares but dont sit here and try to convince someone they cause no harm i have seen what they do first hand.
tom4342 3 years ago
If you have seen the harm they cause first hand, then I suggest you send this information to the Department of Health, as they have failed to find any evidence whatsoever. Likewise, I'm sure the WHO would be interested since they also have failed to find a provable causation between tobacco and cancer. But of course, your so called first hand experience is simply a case of knowing someone that smoked who also happened to die. Well guess what matey boy, everybody dies.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
They keep commissioning studies because dummies like you keep smoking.
JeanScallopsidi 3 years ago
As I say in the video, why don't they show us the evidence that they claim they already have, rather than waste money looking for more.
And you say it's because dummies like me keep smoking. Why don't they just leave me alone and let me smoke. Afterall, if it really was so dangerous, we smokers would all die off. But thats the big flaw in the antis arguments, we smokers just keep on living full and healthy lives.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
You forget Phil. They showed us the evidence. Just it didn't do what it said in the advertising blurb. Seems they thought we were too damned stupid to be able to understand what their 'evidence' really said. So they're not just vindictive bastards, they're ARROGANT VINDICTIVE BASTARDS. Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
No, they like to waste OUR money and because
morons like you believe them.
Wbbrwsr 3 years ago
I used to give to Cancer Research . Not anymore!
TheDailyDetox 3 years ago
Stay out of the British Heart Foundation shops too. They have a vested interest in the same lies. Dave.
DrDave953 3 years ago
Seventy years of trying to prove smoking causes cancer and so far zip.
Just like all those fantasists that squander money trying to prove the loch ness monster exists. They can't, because it doesn't. No ammount of money in the world is gonna find what isn't there.
HairyChestnuts 3 years ago
Hi Phil, Yet another great and true video from your goodself. How on earth do these organisations get away with their fabricated LIES!! It's so frustrating! Thanks for sharing your views. Jo
SalsaJo2 3 years ago