He has some good ideas. Sad that his scholarship lacks rigor. I say that because some very preliminary fact checking shows he is a sloppy reader and writer. For example, in his book "King Tut-Ankh-Amen: Modern Science and the Theft of Kemet," he states that National Geographic made three independent reconstructions when a simple read shows that they only had two: their own artists and then an independent forensic unit. Sloppy. He didn't read deeper even when it would have helped his own case.
He has some good ideas. Sad that his scholarship lacks rigor. I say that because some very preliminary fact checking shows he is a sloppy reader and writer. For example, in his book "King Tut-Ankh-Amen: Modern Science and the Theft of Kemet," he states that National Geographic made three independent reconstructions when a simple read shows that they only had two: their own artists and then an independent forensic unit. Sloppy. He didn't read deeper even when it would have helped his own case.
zoobiewa 3 months ago
Comment removed
zoobiewa 3 months ago
black power
ram308 4 years ago