@whillop Be patient. You won't be bored much longer. If you don't have an inkling by now what's going on, you either have not experienced anything yet (CE-1 to CE-5) or you haven't done enough research as yet, or maybe both. Have a nice day in Boredville, USA :>)
@whillop Why do you inept, incoherent mind-warped, pea brains think that anybody that doesn't use foul-mouthed speak labeled as a 'female'? Maybe it's because YOU have no gender, can't decide what YOU yourself are and have to sound 'big and tough' to make up for your actual Bambi characteristics. Did I hit a nerve? Move on, cyber-mope. Your IQ isn't cutting it on a thread like this. What is your IQ, anyway, somewhere around room temperature is Alaska? Or I am giving too much credit, twinky?
I'm sure that many, if not most of these scientists feel as I do... it's ultimately of no consequence who is either right or wrong in regards to the authenticity of the UFO phenomena. However, what IS of great importance is the identification of just what is the generative nature of this phenomena.
Whether the genesis of this phenomena ultimately proves to be extraterrestrial, extra-dimensional, psychological or natural phenomena it is of scientific importance to ascertain which.
The work by Phillips and others show that the physical landing traces are objectively real. Yet paradoxically, the craft themselves have a peculiar quasi-existence. They are witnesses by sane, credible people, sometimes by multiple witnesses and in rare cases by many people simultaneously (see the Papua New Guinea case and the UFO and aliens seen by the Zimbabwean children), yet there are no indisputably authentic photographs / footage. There may be a parallel here with phenomena like stigmata.
Scientists at the prestigious American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Aerospace Sciences packed the auditorium to listen to these UFO researchers. You see, it's not that scientists aren't interested. The problem is the 'power elite', if you will, those who hold the strings and decide which areas of inquiry are to be encouraged and which are to be discouraged and denied funding. How often do we hear that science is not interested in UFOs. Well 'science' may not be, but scientists are.
Where can i view Teds catalogue of physical trace evidence? his website seems to be down.
itsabomberscope 1 year ago
SOOOOO BOOOOORING !
whillop 1 year ago
@whillop Be patient. You won't be bored much longer. If you don't have an inkling by now what's going on, you either have not experienced anything yet (CE-1 to CE-5) or you haven't done enough research as yet, or maybe both. Have a nice day in Boredville, USA :>)
TITHONIA1 1 year ago
@TITHONIA1 You are a crackpot , Granny .
whillop 1 year ago
@whillop Why do you inept, incoherent mind-warped, pea brains think that anybody that doesn't use foul-mouthed speak labeled as a 'female'? Maybe it's because YOU have no gender, can't decide what YOU yourself are and have to sound 'big and tough' to make up for your actual Bambi characteristics. Did I hit a nerve? Move on, cyber-mope. Your IQ isn't cutting it on a thread like this. What is your IQ, anyway, somewhere around room temperature is Alaska? Or I am giving too much credit, twinky?
TITHONIA1 1 year ago
I'm sure that many, if not most of these scientists feel as I do... it's ultimately of no consequence who is either right or wrong in regards to the authenticity of the UFO phenomena. However, what IS of great importance is the identification of just what is the generative nature of this phenomena.
Whether the genesis of this phenomena ultimately proves to be extraterrestrial, extra-dimensional, psychological or natural phenomena it is of scientific importance to ascertain which.
zenmeister451 1 year ago
The work by Phillips and others show that the physical landing traces are objectively real. Yet paradoxically, the craft themselves have a peculiar quasi-existence. They are witnesses by sane, credible people, sometimes by multiple witnesses and in rare cases by many people simultaneously (see the Papua New Guinea case and the UFO and aliens seen by the Zimbabwean children), yet there are no indisputably authentic photographs / footage. There may be a parallel here with phenomena like stigmata.
raggedmoorlander 1 year ago
Scientists at the prestigious American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Aerospace Sciences packed the auditorium to listen to these UFO researchers. You see, it's not that scientists aren't interested. The problem is the 'power elite', if you will, those who hold the strings and decide which areas of inquiry are to be encouraged and which are to be discouraged and denied funding. How often do we hear that science is not interested in UFOs. Well 'science' may not be, but scientists are.
raggedmoorlander 1 year ago 6
I agree Bobs... he's very well respected.
BearWa11ace 1 year ago
Ted Phillips is, without a doubt, one of the greatest heroes of this field. He's an onorable and good man.
threebobs 1 year ago 9
Only 459 views. Sad.
poppyplanet1 2 years ago
that's because they didn't add the X-Files theme to the video. UFO tards love that shit and have come to expect it in any standard UFO video.
mrbubetube 1 year ago