Added: 2 years ago
From: landcrab75
Views: 6,061
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • All that prevented the engine coming through the bulkhead on a head on was a single skin of pressed steel - Chris Kingham said no attention was paid to secondary safety but Issigonis claimed his cars had dodgeability.

    Yes I'd like to know more about the 1800's structural rigidity and how well it handled impacts but suspect Thatcham will ask £100 for 40 year old footage to "appease their shareholders". Do they think GM will base future designs of the Astra on a 40 year old chassis?

  • From what I remember reading of the crash tests that they did in the 1970's, the structure was strong enough but the footwell deformation was considerable (and the mini was worse).

  • One of the few things in the 1800's favour was the immensely strong structure (before the sills rotted out, anyway)

  • @mrspivvy

    they also have an extremley strong pipe like column that runs right across the width of the car behind the engine, this is what houses the hydrolastic displacers.

  • They were strong alright. You could jack it up at each end, and the doors would open and close perfectly.

  • This was all they showed on TV. I guess there is more footage and probably a results page listing deformities but you would need the patience of Jobe to track them down as the lab was privatised and now everything costs.

  • id like to see more footage of this since i drive one of these! lol

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more