I like Ron Paul but since he insists on running as a republican,he will never be a presidential option.Our fake two party system will never give you that option.
Ron Paul is a _classical Liberal_ after the fashion of Thomas Jefferson & the majority of the Founding Fathers. This means that his views are consistent with the Declaration and Constitution; the concept of individual Liberty; that our rights do not stem from the whims of other men, but are rather the inherent condition of birth; that a just government may exist only in that it defends those rights & serves at the consent of the governed.
Much the opposite to our present state of de-volution.
The current situation involves a government which expands insular bureaucracy & moves continuously away from public accountability.
Lack of accountability ensures the growth of incestuous relationships between government & monopolistic corporations, corruption & failure to uphold principles of justice, destroying the foundations of a free & open society. Free-market capitalism is the hallmark of such a society, Monopolist Corporatism & corrupted elitist, government enablers are it's downfall.
He's not a neo-con but his policies (when it comes to economic policies) side with elitism and wealth over the lives of citizens. He is an ideologue and applies his ideology towards everything rather then taking a pragmatic approach when it comes to ideals (Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness). His stance on health care is horrendous. He supports letting people who can't pay die and for that I can't take him seriously. The right to life is an unalienable right and the prime directive.
"...side with elitism and wealth over the lives of citizens."
e.g. He believes in keeping what you earn.
"...pragmatic approach when it comes to ideals."
How the hell do you approach ideals pragmatically?
"...letting people who can't pay die..."
He supports the idea that we can take care of ourselves and eachother without government interference. Charity health care used to work in this country before gov't regulated it to death.
"The right to life is an unalienable right and the prime directive."
The right to life, and the pursuit of happiness, does not imply the right to health care. To have a right to a service implies you have the right to take it , regardless of what anyone else says, even the provider of said service.
We share a moral obligation to provide for our fellow citizens a certain standard of living, wherever possible. That does not imply a right to that standard, nor a need for government force.
Ah! If having healthcare provided by Govt is so good - why not provide everything else also provided by govt? Letting people die isn't anything new. It has been happening for a while, so has the attempt to save as many people as possible. The former being humans, the later being charitable human beings. As a doctor who works with his patients and not with medicare, Ron Paul is hardly a person you can accuse of "letting people die". But don't let facts get in your way.
I like Ron Paul but since he insists on running as a republican,he will never be a presidential option.Our fake two party system will never give you that option.
MrSafetymeeting 1 year ago
Ron Paul is a _classical Liberal_ after the fashion of Thomas Jefferson & the majority of the Founding Fathers. This means that his views are consistent with the Declaration and Constitution; the concept of individual Liberty; that our rights do not stem from the whims of other men, but are rather the inherent condition of birth; that a just government may exist only in that it defends those rights & serves at the consent of the governed.
Much the opposite to our present state of de-volution.
Destry7 2 years ago
The current situation involves a government which expands insular bureaucracy & moves continuously away from public accountability.
Lack of accountability ensures the growth of incestuous relationships between government & monopolistic corporations, corruption & failure to uphold principles of justice, destroying the foundations of a free & open society. Free-market capitalism is the hallmark of such a society, Monopolist Corporatism & corrupted elitist, government enablers are it's downfall.
Destry7 2 years ago
The Revolution is strong in Miami, FL
Great talking points fellow patriot.
For LIBERTY !!
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
RON PAUL!! SUPPORT HR 1207!
jshdude 2 years ago
People, we need 290 cosponsors for HR 1207. That would make the bill Obama-proof.
Give me 2-90 almighty! Fear our racket, then it will come down on the FED by the force of the people. BTW, while there at it
and auditing the FED, audit the Congress as well! Their not doing there job either.
Question: Could the IRS audit the FED? ;-) Now, that would be awesome. Both unconstitutional!
knuddel123 2 years ago
Comment removed
knuddel123 2 years ago
Good to see another Ron Paul supporter, though this is a little late. (Or maybe not...) ;)
IlluminaZero 2 years ago
Illumina..it's never late to keep spreading the truth. The Revolution is stronger than ever.
AStarSpangledGirl 2 years ago
He's not a neo-con but his policies (when it comes to economic policies) side with elitism and wealth over the lives of citizens. He is an ideologue and applies his ideology towards everything rather then taking a pragmatic approach when it comes to ideals (Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness). His stance on health care is horrendous. He supports letting people who can't pay die and for that I can't take him seriously. The right to life is an unalienable right and the prime directive.
PierreElliottTrudeau 2 years ago
Free Market =/= Corporatism
BIackOp 2 years ago
"...side with elitism and wealth over the lives of citizens."
e.g. He believes in keeping what you earn.
"...pragmatic approach when it comes to ideals."
How the hell do you approach ideals pragmatically?
"...letting people who can't pay die..."
He supports the idea that we can take care of ourselves and eachother without government interference. Charity health care used to work in this country before gov't regulated it to death.
lalieth 2 years ago
"The right to life is an unalienable right and the prime directive."
The right to life, and the pursuit of happiness, does not imply the right to health care. To have a right to a service implies you have the right to take it , regardless of what anyone else says, even the provider of said service.
We share a moral obligation to provide for our fellow citizens a certain standard of living, wherever possible. That does not imply a right to that standard, nor a need for government force.
lalieth 2 years ago 2
lalieth..well said!!!!
AStarSpangledGirl 2 years ago
Ah! If having healthcare provided by Govt is so good - why not provide everything else also provided by govt? Letting people die isn't anything new. It has been happening for a while, so has the attempt to save as many people as possible. The former being humans, the later being charitable human beings. As a doctor who works with his patients and not with medicare, Ron Paul is hardly a person you can accuse of "letting people die". But don't let facts get in your way.
utubehayter 2 years ago
utubehayter...exactly!!!
AStarSpangledGirl 2 years ago
lol..Where did you get that NONSENSE from Pierre????? lol
AStarSpangledGirl 2 years ago